Mechanistically modeling peripheral cytokine dynamics following bispecific dosing in solid tumors

Model-Informed Drug Development Applications and Opportunities in mRNA-LNP Therapeutics

The utilization of lipid nanoparticles (LNP) for encapsulating mRNA has revolutionized the field of therapeutics, enabling the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines and cancer vaccines. However, the clinical development of mRNA-LNP therapeutics faces numerous challenges due to their complex mechanisms of action and limited clinical experience. To overcome these hurdles, Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) emerges as a valuable tool that can be applied to mRNA-LNP therapeutics, facilitating the evaluation of their safety and efficacy through the integration of data from all stages into appropriate modeling and simulation techniques. In this review, we provide an overview of current MIDD applications in mRNA-LNP therapeutics clinical development using in vivo data. A variety of modeling methods are reviewed, including quantitative system pharmacology (QSP), physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK), mechanistic pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), population PK/PD, and model-based meta-analysis (MBMA). Additionally, we compare the differences between mRNA-based therapeutics, small interfering RNA, and adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies in terms of their clinical pharmacology, and discuss the potential for mutual sharing of MIDD knowledge between these therapeutics. Furthermore, we highlight the promising future opportunities for applying MIDD approaches in the development of mRNA-LNP drugs. By emphasizing the importance of applying MIDD knowledge throughout mRNA-LNP therapeutics development, this review aims to encourage stakeholders to recognize the value of MIDD and its potential to enhance the safety and efficacy evaluation of mRNA-LNP therapeutics.

A Multiple-Model-Informed Drug-Development Approach for Optimal Regimen Selection of an Oncolytic Virus in Combination With Pembrolizumab

The antitumor efficacy of an intratumoral injection of a genetically engineered oncolytic vaccinia virus carrying human IL-7 and murine IL-12 genes (hIL-7/mIL-12-VV) was demonstrated in CT26.WT-bearing mice. In the CT26.WT-bearing mouse model, the efficacy of the combination of hIL-7/mIL-12-VV plus the anti-programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 antibody was determined to be correlated with the timing of administration: greater efficacy was observed when hIL-7/mIL-12-VV was administered before the anti-PD-1 agent instead of simultaneous administration. To identify an optimal dosing regimen for first-in-human clinical trials, a multiple model-informed drug-development (MIDD) approach was used through development of a quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model and an agent-based model (ABM). All models were built and verified using available literature and preclinical study data. Multiple dosing scenarios were explored using virtual populations by altering the interval between hIL-7/hIL-12-VV and pembrolizumab administration. In contrast with observations from preclinical studies, both the QSP and the ABM models demonstrated no antagonistic effect on the dose-dependent antitumor efficacy of hIL-7/hIL-12-VV by pembrolizumab in simulations of clinical therapy. Based on the MIDD strategy, it was recommended that the highest dose of hIL-7/hIL-12-VV and pembrolizumab should be administered on the same day, but with pembrolizumab administration following hIL-7/hIL-12-VV administration. Multiple different modeling approaches uniquely supported and informed the first-in-human clinical trial design by guiding the optimal dose and regimen selection.

Clinical Pharmacology of Cytokine Release Syndrome with T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibodies: Current Insights and Drug Development Strategies

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a common acute toxicity in T-cell therapies, including T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (T-BiSp). Effective CRS management and prevention are crucial in T-BiSp development. Required hospitalization for seven of the nine approved T-BiSp and the need for clinical intervention in severe cases highlight the importance of mitigation strategies to reduce health care burden and improve patient outcomes. In this review, we discuss the emerging evidence on CRS mitigation, management, and prediction. We cover different strategies for dose optimization, current and emerging (pre) treatment strategies, quantitative pharmacology tools used during drug development, and biomarkers and predictive factors. Insights are gleaned on step-up dosing and formulation effects on CRS and CRS relationships with cytokine dynamics and drug levels gathered through a review of T-BiSp licensing applications and emerging data from conferences and publications.

Identifying biomarkers for treatment of uveal melanoma by T cell engager using a QSP model

Uveal melanoma (UM), the primary intraocular tumor in adults, arises from eye melanocytes and poses a significant threat to vision and health. Despite its rarity, UM is concerning due to its high potential for liver metastasis, resulting in a median survival of about a year after detection. Unlike cutaneous melanoma, UM responds poorly to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) due to its low tumor mutational burden and PD-1/PD-L1 expression. Tebentafusp, a bispecific T cell engager (TCE) approved for metastatic UM, showed potential in clinical trials, but the objective response rate remains modest. To enhance TCE efficacy, we explored quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) modeling in this study. By integrating a TCE module into an existing QSP model and using clinical data on UM and tebentafusp, we aimed to identify and rank potential predictive biomarkers for patient selection. We selected 30 important predictive biomarkers, including model parameters and cell concentrations in tumor and blood compartments. We investigated biomarkers using different methods, including comparison of median levels in responders and non-responders, and a cutoff-based biomarker testing algorithm. CD8+ T cell density in the tumor and blood, CD8+ T cell to regulatory T cell ratio in the tumor, and naïve CD4+ density in the blood are examples of key biomarkers identified. Quantification of predictive power suggested a limited predictive power for single pre-treatment biomarkers, which was improved by early on-treatment biomarkers and combination of predictive biomarkers. Ultimately, this QSP model could facilitate biomarker-guided patient selection, improving clinical trial efficiency and UM treatment outcomes.

Dosage Optimization: A Regulatory Perspective for Developing Oncology Drugs

Optimized dosages provide a secure foundation for the development of well-tolerated and effective oncology drugs. Project Optimus, an initiative within the Oncology Center of Excellence, strives to reform the dosage optimization and dosage selection paradigm in oncology. This initiative stems from the availability of targeted drugs and from the demand for more tolerable dosages from patients, caregivers, and advocates. Reforming dosage optimization for oncology drugs requires a paradigm shift from the one employed for cytotoxic chemotherapy to one that understands and considers the unique attributes of targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and cellular therapy. Limited characterization of dosage during drug development may result in (1) patients not staying on a therapy long-term due to poor tolerability, (2) failure to establish positive benefit-risk in clinical trials for regulatory approval (3) withdrawal of drugs from the market (4) removal of indications of drugs from the market. Timely access to drugs is important for all patients with cancer, so it is vital to iteratively analyze all nonclinical and clinically relevant data at each stage of development and leverage quantitative approaches, innovative trial designs, and regulatory support to arrive at dosages with favorable benefit-risk. This review highlights the key challenges and opportunities to embracing this new paradigm and realizing the full potential of new oncology therapies.

Clinical Pharmacology Strategies for Bispecific Antibody Development: Learnings from FDA-Approved Bispecific Antibodies in Oncology

Bispecific antibodies, by enabling the targeting of more than one disease-associated antigen or engaging immune effector cells, have both advantages and challenges compared with a combination of two different biological products. As of December 2023, there are 11 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved BsAb products on the market. Among these, 9 have been approved for oncology indications, and 8 of these are CD3 T-cell engagers. Clinical pharmacology strategies, including dose-related strategies, are critical for bispecific antibody development. This analysis reviewed clinical studies of all approved bispecific antibodies in oncology and identified dose-related perspectives to support clinical dose optimization and regulatory approvals, particularly in the context of the Food and Drug Administration's Project Optimus: (1) starting doses and dose ranges in first-in-human studies; (2) dose strategies including step-up doses or full doses for recommended phase 2 doses or dose level(s) used for registrational intent; (3) restarting therapy after dose delay; (4) considerations for the introduction of subcutaneous doses; (5) body weight vs. flat dosing strategy; and (6) management of immunogenicity. The learnings arising from this review are intended to inform successful strategies for future bispecific antibody development.

Investigational bispecific antibodies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder with a characteristic chronic inflammation of the synovium that may lead to the destruction of the joints in untreated patients. Interestingly, despite the availability of several effective treatments, many patients do not achieve remission or low disease activity or may experience disease relapse.Following the above unmet needs, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have emerged as a new approach to improve the disease's treatment. BsAbs are designed to simultaneously target two different proteins involved in RA pathogenesis, leading to enhanced efficacy and reduced side effects compared to traditional monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the development of BsAbs for RA treatment, including their mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile. We also deal with the challenges and future directions in this field.

EXPERT OPINION

BsAbs show promise in preclinical and clinical evaluations for treating RA. Further research is needed to optimize design and dosage and identify ideal patient groups. BsAbs can benefit disease management and improve outcomes of RA patients.

Hyperthermia in Combination with Emerging Targeted and Immunotherapies as a New Approach in Cancer Treatment

Despite significant advancements in the development of novel therapies, cancer continues to stand as a prominent global cause of death. In many cases, the cornerstone of standard-of-care therapy consists of chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or a combination of both. Notably, hyperthermia (HT), which has been in clinical use in the last four decades, has proven to enhance the effectiveness of CT and RT, owing to its recognized potency as a sensitizer. Furthermore, HT exerts effects on all steps of the cancer-immunity cycle and exerts a significant impact on key oncogenic pathways. Most recently, there has been a noticeable expansion of cancer research related to treatment options involving immunotherapy (IT) and targeted therapy (TT), a trend also visible in the research and development pipelines of pharmaceutical companies. However, the potential results arising from the combination of these innovative therapeutic approaches with HT remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this review aims to explore the oncology pipelines of major pharmaceutical companies, with the primary objective of identifying the principal targets of forthcoming therapies that have the potential to be advantageous for patients by specifically targeting molecular pathways involved in HT. The ultimate goal of this review is to pave the way for future research initiatives and clinical trials that harness the synergy between emerging IT and TT medications when used in conjunction with HT.

Development of bispecific T cell engagers: harnessing quantitative systems pharmacology

Bispecific T cell engagers (bsTCEs) have emerged as a promising class of cancer immunotherapy. Several bsTCEs have achieved marketing approval; dozens more are under clinical investigation. However, the clinical development of bsTCEs remains rife with challenges, including nuanced pharmacology, limited translatability of preclinical findings, frequent on-target toxicity, and convoluted dosing regimens. In this opinion article we present a distinct perspective on how quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) can serve as a powerful tool for overcoming these obstacles. Recent advances in QSP modeling have empowered developers of bsTCEs to gain a deeper understanding of their context-dependent pharmacology, bridge gaps in experimental data, guide first-in-human (FIH) dose selection, design dosing regimens with expanded therapeutic windows, and improve long-term treatment outcomes. We use recent case studies to exemplify the potential of QSP techniques to support future bsTCE development.

Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling for bispecific antibodies: challenges and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Unlike conventional antibodies, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are engineered antibody- or antibody fragment-based molecules that can simultaneously recognize two different epitopes or antigens. Over the past decade, there has been an explosion of bsAbs being developed across therapeutic areas. Development of bsAbs presents unique challenges and mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling has served as a powerful tool to optimize their development and realize their clinical utility.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the guiding principles and case examples of how fit-for-purpose, mechanism-based PK/PD models have been applied to answer questions commonly encountered in bsAb development are presented. Such models characterize the key pharmacological elements of bsAbs, and they can be utilized for model-informed drug development. We also include the discussion of challenges, knowledge gaps and future direction for such models.

EXPERT OPINION

Mechanistic PK/PD modeling is a powerful tool to support the development of bsAbs. These models can be extrapolated to predict treatment outcomes based on mechanisms of action (MoA) and clinical observations to form positive learn-and-confirm cycles during drug development, due to their abilities to differentiate system- and drug-specific parameters. Meanwhile, the models should keep being adapted according to novel drug design and MoA, providing continuous opportunities for model-informed drug development.

T-Cell Engagers in Solid Cancers-Current Landscape and Future Directions

Monoclonal antibody treatment initially heralded an era of molecularly targeted therapy in oncology and is now widely applied in modulating anti-cancer immunity by targeting programmed cell receptors (PD-1, PD-L1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and, more recently, lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3). Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) recently proved to be a valid approach to inducing anti-cancer immunity by directly modifying the host's immune cells. However, such cell-based therapy requires extensive resources such as leukapheresis, ex vivo modification and expansion of cytotoxic T-cells and current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) laboratories and presents significant logistical challenges. Bi-/trispecific antibody technology is a novel pharmaceutical approach to facilitate the engagement of effector immune cells to potentially multiple cancer epitopes, e.g., the recently approved blinatumomab. This opens the opportunity to develop 'off-the-shelf' anti-cancer agents that achieve similar and/or complementary anti-cancer effects as those of modified immune cell therapy. The majority of bi-/trispecific antibodies target the tumor-associated antigens (TAA) located on the extracellular surface of cancer cells. The extracellular antigens represent just a small percentage of known TAAs and are often associated with higher toxicities because some of them are expressed on normal cells (off-target toxicity). In contrast, the targeting of intracellular TAAs such as mutant RAS and TP53 may lead to fewer off-target toxicities while still achieving the desired antitumor efficacy (on-target toxicity). Here, we provide a comprehensive review on the emerging field of bi-/tri-specific T-cell engagers and potential therapeutic opportunities.

Strategies for clinical dose optimization of T cell-engaging therapies in oncology

Innovative approaches in the design of T cell-engaging (TCE) molecules are ushering in a new wave of promising immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer. Their mechanism of action, which generates an in trans interaction to create a synthetic immune synapse, leads to complex and interconnected relationships between the exposure, efficacy, and toxicity of these drugs. Challenges thus arise when designing optimal clinical dose regimens for TCEs with narrow therapeutic windows, with a variety of dosing strategies being evaluated to mitigate key side effects such as cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and on-target off-tumor toxicities. This review evaluates the current approaches to dose optimization throughout the preclinical and clinical development of TCEs, along with perspectives for improvement of these strategies. Quantitative approaches used to aid the understanding of dose-exposure-response relationships are highlighted, along with opportunities to guide the rational design of next-generation TCE molecules, and optimize their dose regimens in patients.