BREEZE: Open-label clinical study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of treprostinil inhalation powder as Tyvaso DPI™ in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Validation of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact for Clinical Use (SYMPACT-CP): a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and impacts in clinical trials. It includes recall periods of 24 h for symptoms and 7 days for impacts. The PAH-SYMPACT for use in Clinical Practice (SYMPACT-CP) is an adaptation of the PAH-SYMPACT in which the recall period for symptoms has been revised to 7 days, a timeframe more appropriate for clinical practice settings. The PAH-SYMPACT was psychometrically validated previously. As such, this study focused on assessing whether patients with PAH can use the SYMPACT-CP appropriately to rate their symptoms over the 7-day range, and it explored their perspectives on the utility and feasibility of completing the questionnaire as part of routine clinical assessments.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, noninterventional, qualitative study involving one-on-one telephone interviews with English-speaking adults (≥ 18 years) living in the US diagnosed with PAH. Participants were provided copies of the SYMPACT-CP to review, and interviews were subsequently conducted using a semi-structured guide including concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing sections. Transcripts were coded using a coding framework based on the interview guide.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants were interviewed (mean age, 49.9 years; n = 13 female, n = 13 White). Most (n = 12) stated that they thought about the last 7 calendar days or the "last week" when asked to interpret the 7-day recall period and all but one (n = 14) could easily remember their symptoms over this period. All 15 participants reported that it would be easy to fill out the SYMPACT-CP prior to a clinic visit with their physician or other healthcare provider (HCP), and most (n = 14) felt it would be useful in the management of their disease. Participants felt that breathing difficulties (n = 11), followed by swelling (n = 4), feeling lightheaded, dizzy, or faint (n = 3), and heart palpitations/heart fluttering (n = 3) were the most important symptoms to share with their HCPs.

CONCLUSIONS

The SYMPACT-CP is valid to assess symptoms and impacts of PAH in clinical practice. Compared with the PAH-SYMPACT, it provides a consistent 7-day recall period for symptoms and impacts and may improve symptom monitoring and disease management during clinical appointments.

Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (PH-ILD): Back to the Future

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive syndrome characterized by increased pulmonary artery pressure. PH often complicates chronic lung diseases, thus contributing to a substantial disease burden and poor prognosis. The WHO Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension has many subcategories, including sleep-hypoventilation PH, high altitude-PH, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-PH, and interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD), the latter carrying the worst prognosis. ILD is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by cough and shortness of breath and, in progressive forms, irreversible loss of function and respiratory failure. The development of PH in patients with ILD worsens exercise capacity and exertional dyspnea and impairs quality of life. Thus, suspicion and early detection of PH following thorough cardiologic evaluation (i.e., echocardiography, pro-BNP, and right heart catheterization) is paramount for appropriate patient management. For PH secondary to chronic respiratory diseases, current guidelines recommend optimizing the treatment of the underlying respiratory condition and offering long-term oxygen therapy. In recent years, several clinical trials have failed to identify drugs beneficial for group 3 PH. Conversely, the INCREASE trial of inhaled treprostinil has recently provided hope for treating PH-ILD. In this review, we summarize and critically discuss the present and future of the pharmacological management of PH-ILD.

Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Current Strategies and Future Prospects

Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), now known as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), has induced significant treatment breakthroughs in the past decade. Treatment has focused on improving patient survival and quality of life, and delaying disease progression. Current therapies are categorized based on targeting different pathways known to contribute to PAH, including endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5 inhibitors), prostacyclin analogs, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, and activin signaling inhibitors such as Sotatercept. The latest addition to treatment options is soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, such as Riociguat, which directly stimulates the nitric oxide pathway, facilitating vasodilation. Looking to the future, advancements in PAH treatment focus on precision medicine involving the sub-stratification of patients through a deep characterization of altered Transforming Growth Factor-β(TGF-β) signaling and molecular therapies. Gene therapy, targeting specific genetic mutations linked to PAH, and cell-based therapies, such as mesenchymal stem cells, are under investigation. Besides prevailing therapies, emerging PH treatments target growth factors and inflammation-modulating pathways, with ongoing trials assessing their long-term benefits and safety. Hence, this review explores current therapies that delay progression and improve survival, as well as future treatments with curative potential.

Shining a spotlight on pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease care: The latest advances in diagnosis and treatment

Pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) is a complex condition in which 2 consequential diseases interact and increase negative outcomes. Although the pathophysiologic mechanisms of PH-ILD are not yet well understood, the pronounced effect on functional status, supplemental oxygen requirements, health care resource utilization, and mortality that frequently accompany this diagnosis are well documented. A critical feature that complicates pathophysiologic understanding of PH-ILD is that progression of the pulmonary vascular disease does not always appear to be driven by the underlying lung disease. As PH-ILD is a progressive disease, early recognition and treatment initiation have the potential to delay the increased burden it creates. Historically, therapeutic development within pulmonary hypertension has concentrated on pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, PH-ILD and PAH are categorically distinct-belonging to distinct PH groups owing to differing pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic implications. PAH and PH-ILD may have numerous similarities; however, when PAH therapies have been studied in patients with PH-ILD, inconclusive efficacy (bosentan, sildenafil, tadalafil, iloprost) and at times deleterious safety findings (riociguat, ambrisentan) have been observed. Despite the paucity of evidence to support PAH therapy use in this patient population, widespread off-label use of PAH therapies arose as a result of a historical lack of PH-ILD-approved treatment. Recently, inhaled treprostinil-a prostacyclin analog-has become the first therapy approved for treatment of PH-ILD. In the phase 3 INCREASE trial, inhaled treprostinil was effective in improving 6-minute walk distance (the primary endpoint; P < 0.001) as well as N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (P < 0.001). The approval of inhaled treprostinil in 2022 facilitates evidence-based therapeutic management. In addition, the 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension has recently published an extensive summary of clinical research to date in PH-ILD. The proceedings from the 7th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension provide timely recommendations for investigation of PH-ILD and a framework for assessing treatment needs. The therapeutic landscape advances are poised to transform PH-ILD care and improve outcomes for patients with PH-ILD.

Shifting Paradigms in the Management of Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a long-term condition characterised by increased resistance to blood flow in the pulmonary circulation. The disease has a progressive course and is associated with a poor prognosis. Without treatment, PAH is associated with mortality in <3 years. Over the past decade, many advances have been made in revising the haemodynamic definition, clinical classification, risk calculation score, treatment options etc. Suggestions from the Sixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension were incorporated into a literature review that was included in the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS)'s most recent iteration of their guidelines in 2022. The traditional cut-off for pulmonary hypertension (PH), i.e., mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >25 mm Hg, has been challenged by observational cohort studies, which have shown poor outcomes for values of 21-24 mmHg; the new consensus is that PH is defined at mPAP >20 mm Hg. Although the gold standard for diagnosis and the major source of therapy guidance continues to be right cardiac catheterisation, echocardiography remains the initial test of choice. A multidisciplinary approach is highly recommended when treating PH patients and careful evaluation of patients will aid in proper diagnosis and prognosis. Pharmacotherapy for PAH has seen a paradigm shift with the successful use of newer agents in more extensive, longer and more inclusive trials driven by hard endpoints. Macitentan, selexipag and riociguat are three oral agents that have shown astounding success in PAH randomised studies in the past decade. Upfront combination therapy with two agents is now becoming the norm (following the AMBITION, OPTIMA and ITALY trials) and the momentum is shifting towards triple therapy as for essential hypertension. More recently, inhaled treprostinil was shown to improve exercise capacity in PH associated with interstitial lung disease in the phase III INCREASE study and has been granted regulatory approval for World Health Organization group 3 PH. A new class of drug, sotatercept (a tumour growth factor-β signalling inhibitor), has also been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for management of PAH based on positive results from the phase III STELLAR study. Pulmonary artery denervation and balloon pulmonary angioplasty have emerged as viable alternatives in PH that are resistant to drug therapy. This article aims to summarise the key changes and recent advances in diagnosis and managing PH in general, with an emphasis on certain subgroups.

New Therapies in Outpatient Pulmonary Medicine

Newer medications and devices, as well as greater understanding of the benefits and limitations of existing treatments, have led to expanded treatment options for patients with lung disease. Treatment advances have led to improved outcomes for patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, and cystic fibrosis. The risks and benefits of available treatments are substantially variable within these heterogeneous disease groups. Defining the role of newer therapies mandates both an understanding of these disorders and overall treatment approaches. This section will review general treatment approaches in addition to focusing on newer therapies for these conditions..

Therapeutic Potential of Treprostinil Inhalation Powder for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Evidence to Date

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a complex and incurable disease for which pulmonary vasodilators remain the core therapy. Of the three primary pathways that vasodilators target, the prostacyclin pathway was the earliest to be used and currently has the largest number of modalities for drug delivery. Inhaled treprostinil has been introduced as a treatment option in PAH and, more recently, pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD), and the earlier nebulized form has been joined by a dry powder form allowing for more convenient use. In this review, we discuss inhaled treprostinil, focusing on the dry powder inhalation (DPI) formulation, and explore its dosing, applications, and evidence to support patient tolerance and acceptance. Recent trials underpinning the evidence for use of inhaled treprostinil and the most recent developments concerning the drug are discussed. Finally, the review looks briefly into premarket formulations of inhaled treprostinil and relevant early studies suggesting efficacy in PAH treatment.

Severe bronchospasm and acute respiratory failure associated with inhaled prostacyclin therapy

Prostacyclin therapy is a mainstay of the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Inhaled prostacyclins present safe and effective options for the management of PAH that limit systemic side effects. We describe the first reported case of life-threatening bronchospasm and acute respiratory failure associated with inhaled prostacyclin administration.

Pulmonary hypertension in the setting of interstitial lung disease: Approach to management and treatment. A consensus statement from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative-Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to interstitial lung disease (ILD), a commonly encountered complication of fibrotic ILDs, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Until recently, the studies of pulmonary vasodilator therapy in PH-ILD have been largely disappointing, with some even demonstrating the potential for harm. This paper is part of a series of Consensus Statements from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative for Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension, with prior publications covering pathogenesis, prevalence, clinical features, phenotyping, clinical trials, and impact of PH-ILD. It offers a comprehensive review of and a holistic approach to treatment of PH-ILD, including the management of underlying interstitial lung diseases, importance of treating the comorbidities, emphasis on importance of exercise and palliation of dyspnea, and review of the most up-to-date guidelines for referral for potential lung transplant work up. It also summarizes the prior, ongoing, and possibly future studies in treatment of the vascular derangement of this morbid condition.

Tyvaso DPI: Drug-device characteristics and patient clinical considerations

Tyvaso DPI is a drug-device combination therapy comprised of a small, portable, reusable, breath-powered, dry powder inhaler (DPI) for the delivery of treprostinil. It is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease. Tyvaso DPI utilizes single-use prefilled cartridges to ensure proper dosing. Unlike nebulizer devices, administration of Tyvaso DPI is passive and does not require coordination with the device. The low-flow rate design results in targeted delivery to the peripheral lungs due to minimal drug loss from impaction in the oropharynx. The inert fumaryl diketopiperazine (FDKP) excipient forms microparticles that carry treprostinil into the airways, with a high fraction of the particles in the respirable range. In a clinical study in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, Tyvaso DPI had similar exposure and pharmacokinetics, low incidence of adverse events, and high patient satisfaction compared with nebulized treprostinil solution. Tyvaso DPI may be considered as a first prostacyclin agent or for those that do not tolerate other prostacyclin formulations, patients with pulmonary comorbidities, patients with mixed Group 1 and Group 3 pulmonary hypertension, or those that prefer an active lifestyle and need a portable, non-invasive treatment. Tyvaso DPI is a patient-preferred, maintenance-free, safe delivery option that may improve patient compliance and adherence.

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a group of disorders affecting the parenchymal tissue of the lungs. This disease leads to complications like pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, etc. that can affect patients. The etiological factors, clinical features, investigation methods, and diseases are conditions associated with ILD. The history of these conditions is of great value; any history of environmental and occupational exposure, medications, dust, or any toxic inhalation can be a predisposing factor. The CT scan is the investigation of choice in the case of ILD. This article states the recent advances made in treating interstitial lung diseases. The non-pharmacological and pharmacological management of ILD is discussed in the article. The discussion below concerns newer drugs approved by the FDA and their adverse effects, dosages, and contraindications. Below is a detailed conversation about ILD and the recent advances in treating this disease.

Pulmonary hypertension inhaled therapies: An updated review

Treatments of pulmonary hypertension (PH) continue to evolve with approval of new therapies. The currently FDA approved inhaled PH therapies include inhaled iloprost for group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), inhaled treprostinil solution and treprostinil dry powder inhaler for both group 1 PAH and group 3 PH associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). Inhaled treprostinil was recently approved for group 3 PH-ILD based on the results of INCREASE trial and the newer formulation of treprostinil dry powder that comes with a new inhaler was recently approved for both group 1 PAH and group 3 PH-ILD based on BREEZE study. The pipeline for inhaled PH therapies includes several promising molecules that can enrich the current PH therapeutic era and mitigate several systemic side effects by directly delivering the drug to the target organ. In this review article we summarize the evidence for the currently approved inhaled PAH/PH therapies, discuss the available inhalation devices, present a roadmap for successful treatment strategy, and present several inhaled PAH/PH therapies in the pipeline.

Inhaled treprostinil vs iloprost: Comparison of adherence, persistence, and health care resource utilization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is associated with a substantial clinical and economic burden. Inhaled prostacyclins are a well-established part of pharmacotherapy for PAH. There are differences between inhaled therapies in the burden imposed by administration frequency. Simpler and less time-consuming inhaled PAH therapies may improve both adherence and persistence and potentially affect outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare real-world health care resource use, costs, and treatment adherence and persistence in patients with PAH who initiated inhaled treprostinil or iloprost. METHODS: Adult patients with 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient medical claims separated by at least 30 days with a diagnosis of PAH were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes with a pharmacy claim for inhaled treprostinil or iloprost. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled in the health plan for 6 months prior to and 12 months after the index date. A proportion of days covered of 0.8 or more was considered adherent; persistence was no gap in therapy for at least 60 days. All-cause health care resource utilization and all-cause costs were assessed. RESULTS: 405 and 62 patients were included in the inhaled treprostinil and iloprost cohorts, respectively. Adherence (50.9% and 22.6%; P < 0.0001) and persistence (6 months, 65.2% vs 35.5%; 12 months, 46.7% vs 16.1%; log-rank P < 0.001) were significantly better with inhaled treprostinil. Post-index allcause inpatient admissions (39.3% vs 54.8%; P = 0.02) and post-index emergency department (ED) utilization (36.3% vs 50.0%; P = 0.04) were lower with inhaled treprostinil. Among patients who were persistent with therapy through 12 months, there was no significant difference between groups in mean (SD) all-cause total costs ($266,462 [137,324] vs $262,826 [112,452] for inhaled treprostinil vs iloprost, respectively; P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that inhaled treprostinil is less burdensome, is associated with greater adherence and persistence, and may reduce all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the United Therapeutics Corporation to obtain data for this analysis and compose the manuscript. Dr Burger has served as clinical investigator in multicenter interventional trials sponsored by United Therapeutics but did not receive any direct compensation. Drs Wu and Morland and Mr Classi are employees of United Therapeutics Corporation and own stock/shares in the company.

Strategizing Drug Therapies in Pulmonary Hypertension for Improved Outcomes

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is characterized by a resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) of 20 mmHg or more and is a disease of multiple etiologies. Of the various types of PH, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by elevated resistance in the pulmonary arterial tree. It is a rare but deadly disease characterized by vascular remodeling of the distal pulmonary arteries. This paper focuses on PAH diagnosis and management including current and future treatment options. Over the last 15 years, our understanding of this progressive disease has expanded from the concept of vasoconstrictive/vasodilatory mismatch in the pulmonary arterioles to now a better appreciation of the role of genetic determinants, numerous cell signaling pathways, cell proliferation and apoptosis, fibrosis, thrombosis, and metabolic abnormalities. While knowledge of its pathophysiology has expanded, the majority of the treatments available today still modulate the same three vasodilatory pathways that have been targeted for over 30 years (endothelin, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin). While modifying these pathways may help improve symptoms and quality of life, none of these directly modify the underlying disease pathogenesis. However, there are now studies ongoing with new drugs that can prevent or reverse these underlying causes of PAH. This review discusses the evidence base for the current treatment algorithms for PAH, as well as discusses novel therapies in development.