A comparison between 4 GM/M2 and 7 GM/M2 cyclophosphamide for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

High-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

BACKGROUND

To compare the mobilizing effects and toxicities of two different doses of cyclophosphamide (CY) plus lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF), we performed a prospective randomized study by enrolling patients suffering with either high-risk Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast cancer undergoing ablative chemotherapy.

METHODS

The NHL patients received 4 cycles of CHOP and the breast cancer patients received 2-3 cycles of FAC (FEC) adjuvant chemotherapy. Then, the patients were randomly allocated to receive CY 4 g/m2 (arm A) or 1.5 g/m2 (arm B) in combination with lenograstim. Large volume leukapheresis was carried out and it was continued daily until the target cell dose of 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cell/kg was reached.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. The median number of leukaphereis sessions actually performed was 2.5 sessions in arm A and 3 sessions in arm B. The target cell dose was obtained with the median number of one leukapheresis session in both arms of the study (p=0.09). The collected number of CD34+ cells in the leukapheresis products was higher in arm A than arm B (22.4 vs. 9.9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively, p=0.05). Grade III or IV leukopenia was present in 14/15 patients (94%) in arm A and in 1/12 patients (8%) in arm B (p<0.0001). Grade Ill or IV thrombocytopenia was present in 8/15 patients (54%) in arm A, but this was not present in any patients of arm B (p=0.0004). Neutropenic fever occurred in 6/15 patients (40%) in arm A, and in 1/12 patients (8%) in arm B (p=0.09). The hematological recovery of the leukocytes and platelets after transplantation was not statistically different between the two doses.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CY plus lenograstim is a safe and effective mobilizing regimen.

Impact of chemotherapy regimen and hematopoietic growth factor on mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells in cancer patients

Various chemotherapy regimens, combined with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(rhG-CSF) or recombinant granulocyte-macrophage CSF (rhGM-CSF) are used in cancer patients to mobilize and collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). In this retrospective study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy of such regimens in 262 patients with different types of malignant diseases. The following chemotherapy regimens were applied: ifosfamide-etoposide-cisplatin or bleomycin (n = 96; mainly patients with testicular cancer); ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) or vincristine (VCR)(n = 52; mainly patients with lymphoma); cyclophosphamide-anthracycline (n = 53; mainly patients with breast cancer); intermediate to high dose (ID-HD) cyclophosphamide (n = 37; mainly patients with breast or ovarian cancer. or multiple myeloma; and others (n = 24). rhG-CSF or rhGM-CSF, each at an average daily dose of 5 microg/kg body weight, were used in 166 and 96 patients, respectively. The study evaluated and compared the efficacy of these two cytokines. In patients receiving rhG-CSF, CD34+ cells could be collected earlier (median: day 14 versus day 16) and there was a significantly higher white blood cell count (WBC)(median 11,350 versus 5550/microl) and CD34+ cell count (median 88 versus 43/microl) at the start of apheresis, and a significantly higher CD34+ cell yield (median 7.4 x 10(6) versus 4.6 x 10(6)/kg) than in patients who receivedrhGM-CSF. Among the various chemotherapeutic regimens used, each combined with rhG-CSF, ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR mobilized a significantly higher number of CD34+ cells (median 119/microl) and produced a significantly higher harvest of these cells (median 13 x 10(6)/kg) than cyclophosphamide-anthracycline (median 87/microl and 7 x 10(6)/kg, respectively) or ID-HD cyclophosphamide (median 59/microl and 5 x I 0(6)/kg, respectively). Ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR was also superior to ifosfamide-etoposide-cisplatin or bleomycin (median 78/microl and 9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively), but at borderline significance. The outcome of PBSC mobilization and collection appeared to be negatively influenced by the number of relapses before the current salvage treatment. These data indicate that mobilization and collection of PBSCstrongly depend on the type of hematopoietic growth factor and chemotherapeutic regimen used. The data further show rhG-CSF is a more effective growth factor than rhGM-CSF and ifosfamide-etoposide-based regimens, particularly ifosfamide-etoposide plus or minus Ara-C or VCR, are highly effective regimens in mobilizing and collecting CD34+ cells.

Engraftment with peripheral blood stem cells collected by large-volume leukapheresis for patients with lymphoma

Seven patients with refractory lymphomas underwent marrow reconstitution with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) harvested by large-volume leukapheresis (LVL). PBSCs were collected from all patients more than 1 month after the last cycle of chemotherapy, and no patient received growth factors. The median number of LVL procedures performed per patient was 4.5, with a mean volume of 24.5 L of blood processed per procedure to obtain 7 x 10(8) mononuclear cells per kg. Autologous PBSCs and platelets were frozen at a controlled rate in plasma and 10-percent dimethyl sulfoxide and stored in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen. This group of patients was compared to a control group (n = 18) who received medullary marrow (MM) transplants for the same diagnoses under the same protocols during the same period. Posttransplant days to white cell engraftment (PBSC = 17, MM = 15.5) were no different. Days to platelet independence were significantly longer in the LVL PBSC group (PBSC = 33, MM = 16; p < 0.05). This pattern of engraftment is typical of patients treated in this manner. Although Day 0 platelet counts (PBSC = 75.5 x 10(9)/L, MM = 85 x 10(9)/L) and total single-donor unit platelet use (PBSC = 8, MM = 9) were no different, Day 1 platelet counts (PBSC = 128 x 10(9)/L, MM = 61.5 x 10(9)/L; p < 0.05) and Day 14 platelet use (PBSC = 5, MM = 8; p < 0.05) were significantly different, because of the transfusion of cryopreserved autologous platelets with PBSCs on Day 0.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become increasingly popular over the last 15 years as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. In the early 1990s, PBPCs replaced bone marrow (BM) as the preferred source of autologous stem cells, and recently the same phenomenon is seen in the allogeneic setting. Under steady-state conditions, the concentration of PBPCs (as defined by CFU-GM and/or CD34+ cells) is very low, and techniques were developed to increase markedly this concentration. Such mobilization techniques include daily injections of filgrastim (G-CSF) or a combination of chemotherapy and growth factors. Leukapheresis procedures allow the collection of large numbers of circulating white blood cells (and PBPCs). One or two leukapheresis procedures are often sufficient to obtain the minimum number of CD34+ cells considered necessary for prompt and consistent engraftment (i.e., 2.5-5.0 x 10(6)/kg). As compared to BM, autologous transplants with PBPCs lead to faster hematologic recovery and have few, if any, disadvantages. In the allogeneic arena, PBPCs also result in faster engraftment, but at a somewhat higher cost of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This may be a double-edged sword leading to both increased graft-versus-tumor effects and increased morbidity. The rapid advances in the study of hematopoietic, and even earlier, stem cells will continue to shape the future of PBPC transplantation.

High-dose melphalan followed by autograft employing non-cryopreserved peripheral blood progenitor cells in children

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) enables dose escalation in the treatment of childhood malignancies. Here we report our experience of using peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) to restore haematopoiesis in five children using a simple cell mobilising regime and non-cryopreservation of the harvests. Cells were mobilised using cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Each patient underwent only two leukaphereses, the product being stored before use at 4 degrees C. Successful autologous PBPC transplantation was achieved with melphalan conditioning chemotherapy and re-infusion of the total progenitor cell product. No colony stimulating factors were administered after transplantation. The median numbers of mononuclear cells collected per patient was 10.0 x 10(8)/kg (range 8.13-19.44) and CFU-GM 57.6 x 10(4)/kg (range 10.4-178.85). All patients subsequently engrafted with the median number of days to a neutrophil count > 0.5 x 10(9)/l being 11 (range 10-16), and to a platelet count > 50 x 10(9)/l being 14 (range 12-31). The median number of in-patient days was only 20 (range 19-30). The median demand for blood was 2 units (range 1-2), and platelets 4 units (range 2-28). Usage of systemic antimicrobials and intravenous feeding was also low. Using this simple strategy, collection and transplantation of autologous progenitor cells can be a straightforward procedure in children. It is possible that this could enable dose escalation in some poor prognosis paediatric tumours.

Autologous Blood Stem Cell Collection after Chemotherapy in Patients with Sensitive and Refractory Malignancies: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

A retrospective study was undertaken to assess the factors affecting the yield of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections after chemotherapy. Fifty-five patients with malignancies, observed in 4 Italian Institutions from January 1987 to June 1991 were eligible for evaluation. This series included 19 non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 11 multiple myeloma, 9 ovarian cancer, 7 Hodgkin disease, 7 acute non-lymphocytic leukemia, 1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 1 neuroblastoma. Five hundred and twenty two PBSC collections were performed on 55 patients after a median of 18 days after the start of chemotherapy. The yields of PBSC collections were related to the dose of cytoreductive chemotherapy exploited for PBSC mobilization and to the number of circulating white blood cells, colony forming unit granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) and the percentage of monocytes at the time of collection.

Forty-eight patients out of 55 transplanted (87%) had rapid, complete and sustained engraftment. Three patients (5%) died of transplant related complications.

Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Haematopoietic stem cells are usually sessile within the bone marrow microenvironment. However, small numbers do circulate in the peripheral blood of normal individuals, and following chemotherapy and/or intravenous growth factors, a substantial transient rise in circulating stem cells occurs. Leukocytes harvested by cytapheresis at this time can be used for autologous reconstitution of the haematopoietic and lymphoid systems following high dosage chemo/radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant disease. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants give rise to similar disease response rates as autologous bone marrow transplants, but have the advantage of more rapid haematopoietic reconstitution, and in addition can be offered to patients in whom marrow harvest is not feasible due to bone marrow damage or infiltration. This article reviews the theoretical and historical background to haematopoietic stem cell research, current clinical practice in peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation and harvesting, addresses the potential advantages and disadvantages compared to bone marrow transplantation, and assesses current experience of comparative efficacy.