Dementia risk reduction: why haven't the pharmacological risk reduction trials worked? An in-depth exploration of seven established risk factors

Umbrella review and Delphi study on modifiable factors for dementia risk reduction

A 2013 systematic review and Delphi consensus study identified 12 modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia, which were subsequently merged into the "LIfestyle for BRAin health" (LIBRA) score. We systematically evaluated whether LIBRA requires revision based on new evidence. To identify modifiable risk and protective factors suitable for dementia risk reduction, we combined an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a two-round Delphi consensus study. The review of 608 unique primary studies and opinions of 18 experts prioritized six modifiable factors: hearing impairment, social contact, sleep, life course inequalities, atrial fibrillation, and psychological stress. Based on expert ranking, hearing impairment, social contact, and sleep were considered the most suitable candidates for inclusion in updated dementia risk scores. As such, the current study shows that dementia risk scores need systematic updates based on emerging evidence. Future studies will validate the updated LIBRA score in different cohorts. HIGHLIGHTS: An umbrella review was combined with opinions of 18 dementia experts. Various candidate targets for dementia risk reduction were identified. Experts prioritized hearing impairment, social contact, and sleep. Re-assessment of dementia risk scores is encouraged. Future work should evaluate the predictive validity of updated risk scores.

Dietary pattern, food, and nutritional supplement effects on cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of previous reviews

CONTEXT

Nutritional interventions may benefit cognition in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, evidence is yet to be synthesized in a way that can inform recommendations for clinical and public health settings.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence on the effect of dietary patterns, foods, and nutritional supplements on cognitive decline in individuals with MCI.

DATA SOURCES

Guided by the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 statement, the Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases, the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched (publication years 2005 to 2020). Included studies were English-language systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting on the effectiveness of nutritional interventions on cognition of individuals with MCI.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on cognitive outcomes and adverse events. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2). Primary study overlap was managed following Cochrane Handbook guidelines.

DATA ANALYSIS

Of the 6677 records retrieved, 20 reviews were included, which, in turn, reported on 43 randomized controlled trials and 1 cohort study that, together, addressed 18 nutritional interventions. Most reviews were limited by quality and the small number of primary studies with small sample sizes. Reviews were mostly positive for B vitamins, omega-3 fatty acids, and probiotics (including 12, 11 and 4 primary studies, respectively). Souvenaid and the Mediterranean diet reduced cognitive decline or Alzheimer's disease progression in single trials with <500 participants. Findings from studies with a small number of participants suggest vitamin D, a low-carbohydrate diet, medium-chain triglycerides, blueberries, grape juice, cocoa flavanols, and Brazil nuts may improve individual cognitive subdomains, but more studies are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Few nutritional interventions were found to convincingly improve cognition of individuals with MCI. More high-quality research in MCI populations is required to determine if nutritional treatments improve cognition and/or reduce progression to dementia.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework protocol identifier DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/BEP2S.

Sex Differences in Dementia

BackgroundWomen in many cohorts have a higher risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia. Sex is a biological construct whereby differences in disease manifestation and prevalence are rooted in genetic differences between XX and XY combinations of chromosomes. This chapter focuses specifically on sex-driven differences in dementia, as opposed to differences driven by gender - a social construct referring to the societal norms that influence people's roles, relationships, and positional power throughout their lifetime.MethodsUsing a narrative review, this chapter explored the characteristics and risk factors for the dementias, alongside a discussion of sex differences including loss of sex steroid hormones in middle-aged women, differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and engagement in lifestyle protective factors for dementia.ResultsThe sex difference in AD prevalence may exist because of systematic and historic differences in risk and protective factors for dementia, including level of education obtained and socioeconomic status differences, which can impact on health and dementia risk.Levels of sex steroids decline significantly after menopause in women, whereas this is more gradual in men with age. Animal and cell culture studies show strong biological plausibility for sex steroids to protect the ageing brain against dementia. Sex steroid hormone replacement therapy has in some observational studies shown to protect against AD, but treatment studies in humans have mainly shown disappointing results. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) shares midlife medical risk (e.g. hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, obesity etc.) factors with AD and other forms of dementia, but also with related lifestyle risk - and protective factors (e.g. exercise, not smoking etc.). Men tend to die earlier of CVD, so fewer survive to develop AD at an older age. Those who do survive may have healthier lifestyles and fewer risk factors for both CVD and AD. An earlier age at menopause also confers great risk for both without hormone treatment.DiscussionIt could be the case that the decline in sex steroids around the menopause make women more susceptible to lifestyle-related risk factors associated with dementia and CVD, but this remains to be further investigated. Combining hormone treatment with lifestyle changes in midlife (e.g. exercise) could be an important preventative treatment for dementia and CVD in later life, but this also requires further research.

Serum lipid traits and the risk of dementia: A cohort study of 254,575 women and 214,891 men in the UK Biobank

Background

Serum lipid traits are associated with cardiovascular disease, but uncertainty remains regarding their associations with dementia.

Methods

From 2006 to 2010, 254,575 women and 214,891 men were included from the UK Biobank. Cox regression estimated overall and sex-specific hazard ratios (HRs) for apolipoprotein A (ApoA), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein A, and various lipid ratios, by quarters and standard deviation (SD) higher, associated with all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD). Subgroup analyses by age and social deprivation were conducted.

Findings

Over 11·8 years (median), 3734 all-cause dementia (1,716 women), 1231 AD and 929 VaD were recorded. Compared to respective lowest quarters, highest quarter of ApoA was associated with lower dementia risk (HR, [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]: 0·77 [0·69, 0·86]) while the highest quarter of ApoB was associated with greater risk (HR, 1·12 [1·01, 1·24]). Higher HDL/ApoA and ApoB/ApoA, were associated with greater risk of dementia (HR, 1·12 [1·00, 1·25], per standard deviation (SD), 1.23 [1·11, 1·37], per SD, respectively), LDL/ApoB was inversely associated (HR, 0·85 [0·76, 0·94], per SD. Higher triglycerides was associated with higher dementia risk in <60 years, but the inverse was observed for ≥60 years. Similar associations were observed for VaD and AD.

Interpretation

Apolipoproteins, and their ratios, were associated with the risk of dementia. It may be prudent to consider apolipoproteins, along with circulating cholesterol, when assessing dementia risk.

Funding

University of New South Wales, UK Medical Research Council, and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Therapeutic roles of plants for 15 hypothesised causal bases of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is progressive and ultimately fatal, with current drugs failing to reverse and cure it. This study aimed to find plant species which may provide therapeutic bioactivities targeted to causal agents proposed to be driving AD. A novel toolkit methodology was employed, whereby clinical symptoms were translated into categories recognized in ethnomedicine. These categories were applied to find plant species with therapeutic effects, mined from ethnomedical surveys. Survey locations were mapped to assess how this data is at risk. Bioactivities were found of therapeutic relevance to 15 hypothesised causal bases for AD. 107 species with an ethnological report of memory improvement demonstrated therapeutic activity for all these 15 causal bases. The majority of the surveys were found to reside within biodiversity hotspots (centres of high biodiversity under threat), with loss of traditional knowledge the most common threat. Our findings suggest that the documented plants provide a large resource of AD therapeutic potential. In demonstrating bioactivities targeted to these causal bases, such plants may have the capacity to reduce or reverse AD, with promise as drug leads to target multiple AD hallmarks. However, there is a need to preserve ethnomedical knowledge, and the habitats on which this knowledge depends.