Contingent versus routine third-trimester screening for late fetal growth restriction

Indicated vs universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies: a pre-post-intervention study

BACKGROUND

In low-risk pregnancies, a third-trimester ultrasound examination is indicated if fundal height measurement and gestational age discrepancy are observed. Despite potential improvement in the detection of ultrasound abnormality, prior trials to date on universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies, compared with indicated ultrasound examination, have not demonstrated improvement in neonatal or maternal adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine if universal third-trimester ultrasound examination in low-risk pregnancies could attenuate composite neonatal adverse outcomes. The secondary objectives were to compare changes in composite maternal adverse outcomes and detection of abnormalities of fetal growth (fetal growth restriction or large for gestational age) or amniotic fluid (oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios).

STUDY DESIGN

Our pre-post intervention study at 9 locations included low-risk pregnancies, those without indication for ultrasound examination in the third trimester. Compared with indicated ultrasound in the preimplementation period, in the postimplementation period, all patients were scheduled for ultrasound examination at 36.0-37.6 weeks. In both periods, clinicians intervened on the basis of abnormalities identified. Composite neonatal adverse outcomes included any of: Apgar score ≤5 at 5 minutes, cord pH <7.00, birth trauma (bone fracture or brachial plexus palsy), intubation for >24 hours, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, seizure, sepsis (bacteremia proven with blood culture), meconium aspiration syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or IV, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, stillbirth after 36 weeks, or neonatal death within 28 days of birth. Composite maternal adverse outcomes included any of the following: chorioamnionitis, wound infection, estimated blood loss >1000 mL, blood transfusion, deep venous thrombus or pulmonary embolism, admission to intensive care unit, or death. Using Bayesian statistics, we calculated a sample size of 600 individuals in each arm to detect >75% probability of any reduction in primary outcome (80% power; 50% hypothesized risk reduction).

RESULTS

During the preintervention phase, 747 individuals were identified during the initial ultrasound examination, and among them, 568 (76.0%) met the inclusion criteria at 36.0-37.6 weeks; during the postintervention period, the corresponding numbers were 770 and 661 (85.8%). The rate of identified abnormalities of fetal growth or amniotic fluid increased from between the pre-post intervention period (7.1% vs 22.2%; P<.0001; number needed to diagnose, 7; 95% confidence interval, 5-9). The primary outcome occurred in 15 of 568 (2.6%) individuals in the preintervention and 12 of 661 (1.8%) in the postintervention group (83% probability of risk reduction; posterior relative risk, 0.69 [95% credible interval, 0.34-1.42]). The composite maternal adverse outcomes occurred in 8.6% in the preintervention and 6.5% in the postintervention group (90% probability of risk; posterior relative risk, 0.74 [95% credible interval, 0.49-1.15]). The number needed to treat to reduce composite neonatal adverse outcomes was 121 (95% confidence interval, 40-200). In addition, the number to reduce composite maternal adverse outcomes was 46 (95% confidence interval, 19-74), whereas the number to prevent cesarean delivery was 18 (95% confidence interval, 9-31).

CONCLUSION

Among low-risk pregnancies, compared with routine care with indicated ultrasound examination, implementation of a universal third-trimester ultrasound examination at 36.0-37.6 weeks attenuated composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes.

Routine third-trimester ultrasound assessment for intrauterine growth restriction

Intrauterine growth restriction significantly impacts perinatal outcomes. Undetected IUGR escalates the risk of adverse outcomes. Serial symphysis-fundal height measurement, a recommended strategy, is insufficient in detecting abnormal fetal growth. Routine third-trimester ultrasounds significantly improve detection rates compared with this approach, but direct high-quality evidence supporting enhanced perinatal outcomes from routine scanning is lacking. In assessing fetal growth, abdominal circumference alone performs comparably to estimated fetal weight. Hadlock formulas demonstrate accurate fetal weight estimation across diverse gestational ages and settings. When choosing growth charts, prescriptive standards (encompassing healthy pregnancies) should be prioritized over descriptive ones. Customized fetal standards may enhance antenatal IUGR detection, but conclusive high-quality evidence is elusive. Emerging observational data suggest that longitudinal fetal growth assessment could predict adverse outcomes better. However, direct randomized trial evidence supporting this remains insufficient.

Impact of a Hybrid Model of Prenatal Care on the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction

OBJECTIVE

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with poor neonatal outcomes and stillbirth, and screening via fundal height or ultrasound is routinely performed. During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we developed a hybrid model of prenatal care which decreased the frequency of in-person visits and incorporated telemedicine visits. We sought to determine if prenatal FGR diagnoses decreased with this hybrid model compared with routine prenatal care.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton nonanomalous neonates with birth weights <10th percentile at term. The "routine care" group was consisted of those who born between April and July 2019 with in-person prenatal care, and the "hybrid care" group was consisted of those who born between April and July 2020 with both in-person and telemedicine prenatal cares at a collaborative academic practice. The primary outcome was the rate of diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA) as defined as infant birth weight <10th percentile without a prenatal diagnosis of FGR. The secondary outcome was timing of diagnosis of FGR.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,345 and 1,296 women gave birth in the routine and hybrid groups, respectively. The number of in-person prenatal care visits decreased from 15,024 in the routine period to 7,727 in the hybrid period; 3,265 telemedicine visits occurred during the hybrid period. The total number of prenatal patients remained relatively stable at 3,993 and 3,753 between periods. Third trimester ultrasounds decreased from 2,929 to 2,014 between periods. Birth weights <10 percentile occurred in 115 (8.6%) births during the routine period and 79 (6.1%) births during the hybrid period. Of 115, 44 (38.3%) cases were prenatally diagnosed with FGR in the routine versus 28 of 79 (35.4%) in the hybrid group (p = 0.76). Median gestational age at diagnosis did not vary between groups (36 vs. 37 weeks, p = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

A hybrid prenatal care model did not alter the detection of FGR. Future efforts should further explore the benefits of incorporating telemedicine into prenatal care.

KEY POINTS

· Telemedicine visits can provide comprehensive prenatal care.. · FGR was diagnosed equally with hybrid versus routine prenatal care.. · FGR diagnosis was not delayed with hybrid care..

Personalized Model to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Delivery Using Fetal Biometrics, Maternal Characteristics, and Pregnancy Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Births Assisted at a Spanish Hospital

Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a newborn with a birth weight for gestational age < 10th percentile. Routine third-trimester ultrasound screening for fetal growth assessment has detection rates (DR) from 50 to 80%. For this reason, the addition of other markers is being studied, such as maternal characteristics, biochemical values, and biophysical models, in order to create personalized combinations that can increase the predictive capacity of the ultrasound. With this purpose, this retrospective cohort study of 12,912 cases aims to compare the potential value of third-trimester screening, based on estimated weight percentile (EPW), by universal ultrasound at 35−37 weeks of gestation, with a combined model integrating maternal characteristics and biochemical markers (PAPP-A and β-HCG) for the prediction of SGA newborns. We observed that DR improved from 58.9% with the EW alone to 63.5% with the predictive model. Moreover, the AUC for the multivariate model was 0.882 (0.873−0.891 95% C.I.), showing a statistically significant difference with EPW alone (AUC 0.864 (95% C.I.: 0.854−0.873)). Although the improvements were modest, contingent detection models appear to be more sensitive than third-trimester ultrasound alone at predicting SGA at delivery.

Fetal growth restriction: underdiagnosed condition with non-optimal screening

BACKGROUND

Fetal Growth restriction (FGR) is the pathological failure of a fetus to reach its biologically determined growth potential. Detection of FGR fetuses is a universally agreed key objective of antenatal care. Antenatal detection of FGR has undeniable benefits, juggling between intensive fetal surveillance and optimized timing of delivery; it reduces adverse perinatal outcomes by up to four-fold. However, FGR is still widely underdiagnosed. We aimed to identify the prevalence of FGR diagnosis in our wards and study the impact of the 2013 published French guidelines on the detection rate of FGR. The secondary objective aimed to highlight the factors of suboptimal screening in the population of non-diagnosed FGR fetuses and emphasize the screening method that led to antenatal diagnosis of FGR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study at a single tertiary maternity center in Lyon-France, the Femme Mère Enfant Hospital, including the exhaustive population of FGR born after 24 + 0 weeks of gestation from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2017. FGR was defined combining the neonatal and antenatal consensus-based definitions for early and late FGR in absence of congenital anomalies, excluding small for gestational age fetuses. For all FGR fetuses, we compared the antenatal detection rate of FGR during 2011-2013 to 2015-2017, since the French guidelines were published in December 2013. When FGR fetuses underwent an antenatal diagnosis of FGR, we retrospectively collected the characteristics that led to the diagnosis. When fetuses were not diagnosed as FGR, we retrospectively reviewed the implementation of the recommended screening method, enabling to evaluate whether screening was optimal or not. Statistical analysis was performed in July 2018, and statistical significance was regarded as a p-value <.05.

RESULTS

Over the seven-year period, and among 31,052 newborns, 1020 (3.3%) infants were identified as FGR and met the inclusion criteria. The detection rate of FGR was similar before and after publication of the French Guidelines related to FGR in 2013. Indeed, 50.8% (201/395) FGR were diagnosed between 2011 and 2013 versus 52.6% (245/465) between 2015 and 2017 (p = .59). In the population of non-diagnosed FGR infants, screening was suboptimal in 80%. Symphysis-fundal height (SFH) was not measured in 10.7%, with no difference before and after 2014 (7.3 versus 11.8% p = .11). Ultrasound examination for fetal biometry had not been prescribed in spite of abnormal SFH in 47.7% of undiagnosed FGR infants. Diagnosis has been missed in 11.5% of infants because of misinterpretation of the estimated fetal weight's centile.

CONCLUSION

FGR is widely underdiagnosed. However, the limited performances can partially be explained by the regular misuse of screening method in clinical practice. Despite the systematic third trimester ultrasound screening, the detection rate of FGR was similar to the one reported in the medical literature. The timing of routine third trimester ultrasound in low-risk women may be rethought.

"Screening for small-for-gestational age neonates at early third trimester in a high-risk population for preeclampsia"

BACKGROUND

Strategies to improve prenatal detection of small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates are necessary because its association with poorer perinatal outcome. This study evaluated, in pregnancies with first trimester high risk of early preeclampsia, the performance of a third trimester screening for SGA combining biophysical and biochemical markers.

METHODS

This is a prospective longitudinal study on 378 singleton pregnancies identified at high risk of early preeclampsia according to a first trimester multiparametric algorithm with the cutoff corresponding to 15% false positive rate. This cohort included 50 cases that delivered SGA neonates with birthweight < 10th centile (13.2%) and 328 cases with normal birthweight (86.8%). At 27-30 weeks' gestation, maternal weight, blood pressure, estimated fetal weight, mean uterine artery pulsatility index and maternal biochemical markers (placental growth factor and soluble FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase-1) were assessed. Different predictive models were created to evaluate their performance to predict SGA neonates.

RESULTS

For a 15% FPR, a model that combines maternal characteristics, estimated fetal weight, mean uterine artery pulsatility index and placental growth factor achieved a detection rate (DR) of 56% with a negative predictive value of 92.2%. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.86). The DR of a model including maternal characteristics, estimated fetal weight and mean uterine artery pulsatility index was 54% (AUC, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.70-0.84)). The DR of a model that includes maternal characteristics and placental growth factor achieved a similar performance (DR 56%, AUC 0.75, 95% CI (0.67-0.83)).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of screening for SGA neonates at early third trimester combining biophysical and biochemical markers in a high-risk population is poor. However, a high negative predictive value could help in reducing maternal anxiety, avoid iatrogenic interventions and propose a specific plan for higher risk patients.

Screening for small-for-gestational-age fetuses

INTRODUCTION

It is well established that correct antenatal identification of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses reduces their risk of adverse perinatal outcome with long-term consequences. Ultrasound estimates of fetal weight (EFW_us ) are the ultimate tool for this identification. It can be conducted as a "universal screening", that is, all pregnant women at a specific gestational age. However, in Denmark it is conducted as "selective screening", that is, only on clinical indication. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of the Danish national SGA screening program and the consequences of false-positive and false-negative SGA cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included 2928 women with singleton pregnancies with due dates in 2015. We defined "risk of SGA" by an EFW_us  ≤ -15% of expected for the gestational age and "SGA" as birthweight ≤-22% of expected for gestational age.

RESULTS

At birth, the prevalence of SGA was 3.3%. The overall sensitivity of the Danish screening program was 62% at a false-positive rate of 5.6%. Within the entire cohort, 63% had an EFW_us compared with 79% of the SGA cases. The sensitivity was 79% for those born before 37 weeks of gestation but only 40% for those born after 40 weeks of gestation. The sensitivity was also associated with birthweight deviation; 73% among extreme SGA cases (birthweight deviation ≤-33%) and 55% among mild SGA (birthweight deviation between -22% and -27%). False diagnosis of SGA was associated with an increased rate of induction of labor (OR_adj  = 2.51, 95% CI 1.70-3.71) and cesarean section (OR_adj  = 1.44, 95% CI 0.96-2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the Danish national screening program for SGA based on selective EFW_us on clinical indication has improved considerably over the last 20 years. Limitations of the program are the large proportion of women referred to ultrasound scan and the low performance post-term.

Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants

BACKGROUND

Stillbirth affects 2.6 million pregnancies worldwide each year. Whilst the majority of cases occur in low- and middle-income countries, stillbirth remains an important clinical issue for high-income countries (HICs) - with both the UK and the USA reporting rates above the mean for HICs. In HICs, the most frequently reported association with stillbirth is placental dysfunction. Placental dysfunction may be evident clinically as fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small-for-dates infants. It can be caused by placental abruption or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and many other disorders and factorsPlacental abnormalities are noted in 11% to 65% of stillbirths. Identification of FGA is difficult in utero. Small-for-gestational age (SGA), as assessed after birth, is the most commonly used surrogate measure for this outcome. The degree of SGA is associated with the likelihood of FGR; 30% of infants with a birthweight < 10th centile are thought to be FGR, while 70% of infants with a birthweight < 3rd centile are thought to be FGR. Critically, SGA is the most significant antenatal risk factor for a stillborn infant. Correct identification of SGA infants is associated with a reduction in the perinatal mortality rate. However, currently used tests, such as measurement of symphysis-fundal height, have a low reported sensitivity and specificity for the identification of SGA infants.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound assessment of fetal growth by estimated fetal weight (EFW) and placental biomarkers alone and in any combination used after 24 weeks of pregnancy in the identification of placental dysfunction as evidenced by either stillbirth, or birth of a SGA infant. Secondary objectives were to investigate the effect of clinical and methodological factors on test performance.

SEARCH METHODS

We developed full search strategies with no language or date restrictions. The following sources were searched: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In Process and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane (Wiley) CENTRAL, Science Citation Index (Web of Science), CINAHL (EBSCO) with search strategies adapted for each database as required; ISRCTN Registry, UK Clinical Trials Gateway, WHO International Clinical Trials Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing studies; specialist abstract and conference proceeding resources (British Library's ZETOC and Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index). Search last conducted in Ocober 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies of pregnant women of any age with a gestation of at least 24 weeks if relevant outcomes of pregnancy (live birth/stillbirth; SGA infant) were assessed. Studies were included irrespective of whether pregnant women were deemed to be low or high risk for complications or were of mixed populations (low and high risk). Pregnancies complicated by fetal abnormalities and multi-fetal pregnancies were excluded as they have a higher risk of stillbirth from non-placental causes. With regard to biochemical tests, we included assays performed using any technique and at any threshold used to determine test positivity.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted the numbers of true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative test results from each study. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using the QUADAS-2 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using the hierarchical summary ROC model to estimate and compare test accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 91 studies that evaluated seven tests - blood tests for human placental lactogen (hPL), oestriol, placental growth factor (PlGF) and uric acid, ultrasound EFW and placental grading and urinary oestriol - in a total of 175,426 pregnant women, in which 15,471 pregnancies ended in the birth of a small baby and 740 pregnancies which ended in stillbirth. The quality of included studies was variable with most domains at low risk of bias although 59% of studies were deemed to be of unclear risk of bias for the reference standard domain. Fifty-three per cent of studies were of high concern for applicability due to inclusion of only high- or low-risk women.Using all available data for SGA (86 studies; 159,490 pregnancies involving 15,471 SGA infants), there was evidence of a difference in accuracy (P < 0.0001) between the seven tests for detecting pregnancies that are SGA at birth. Ultrasound EFW was the most accurate test for detecting SGA at birth with a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 21.3 (95% CI 13.1 to 34.6); hPL was the most accurate biochemical test with a DOR of 4.78 (95% CI 3.21 to 7.13). In a hypothetical cohort of 1000 pregnant women, at the median specificity of 0.88 and median prevalence of 19%, EFW, hPL, oestriol, urinary oestriol, uric acid, PlGF and placental grading will miss 50 (95% CI 32 to 68), 116 (97 to 133), 124 (108 to 137), 127 (95 to 152), 139 (118 to 154), 144 (118 to 161), and 144 (122 to 161) SGA infants, respectively. For the detection of pregnancies ending in stillbirth (21 studies; 100,687 pregnancies involving 740 stillbirths), in an indirect comparison of the four biochemical tests, PlGF was the most accurate test with a DOR of 49.2 (95% CI 12.7 to 191). In a hypothetical cohort of 1000 pregnant women, at the median specificity of 0.78 and median prevalence of 1.7%, PlGF, hPL, urinary oestriol and uric acid will miss 2 (95% CI 0 to 4), 4 (2 to 8), 6 (6 to 7) and 8 (3 to 13) stillbirths, respectively. No studies assessed the accuracy of ultrasound EFW for detection of pregnancy ending in stillbirth.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical markers of placental dysfunction used alone have insufficient accuracy to identify pregnancies ending in SGA or stillbirth. Studies combining U and placental biomarkers are needed to determine whether this approach improves diagnostic accuracy over the use of ultrasound estimation of fetal size or biochemical markers of placental dysfunction used alone. Many of the studies included in this review were carried out between 1974 and 2016. Studies of placental substances were mostly carried out before 1991 and after 2013; earlier studies may not reflect developments in test technology.

Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to establish the diagnostic performance of ultrasound screening for predicting late smallness for gestational age and/or fetal growth restriction.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published since 2007 in English, Spanish, French, Italian, or German, using the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We used rrospective and retrospective cohort studies in low-risk or nonselected singleton pregnancies with screening ultrasound performed at ≥32 weeks of gestation.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The estimated fetal weight and fetal abdominal circumference were assessed as index tests for the prediction of birthweight <10th (i.e. smallness for gestational age), less than the fifth, and less than the third centile and fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight less than the third or estimated fetal weight <10th plus Doppler signs). Quality of the included studies was independently assessed by 2 reviewers, using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. For the meta-analysis, hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed, and quantitative data synthesis was performed using random-effects models. The sensitivity of the abdominal circumference <10th centile and estimated fetal weight <10th centile for a fixed 10% false-positive rate was derived from the corresponding hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curves. Heterogeneity between studies was visually assessed using Galbraith plots, and publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and quantified by Deeks' method.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were included. Observed pooled sensitivities of abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight <10th centile for birthweight <10th centile were 35% (95% confidence interval, 20-52%) and 38% (95% confidence interval, 31-46%), respectively. Observed pooled specificities were 97% (95% confidence interval, 95-98%) and 95% (95% confidence interval, 93-97%), respectively. Modeled sensitivities of abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight <10th centile for 10% false-positive rate were 78% (95% confidence interval, 61-95%) and 54% (95% confidence interval, 46-52%), respectively. The sensitivity of estimated fetal weight <10th centile was better when aimed to fetal growth restriction than to smallness for gestational age. Meta-regression analysis showed a significant increase in sensitivity when ultrasound evaluation was performed later in pregnancy (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Third-trimester abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight perform similar in predicting smallness for gestational age. However, for a fixed 10% false-positive rate extrapolated sensitivity is higher for abdominal circumference. There is evidence of better performance when the scan is performed near term and when fetal growth restriction is the targeted condition.

First-trimester and combined first- and second-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVE

To develop a first-trimester or combined first- and second-trimester screening algorithm for the prediction of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and late fetal growth restriction (FGR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancy, who underwent routine first-, second- and third-trimester ultrasound assessment. Late FGR was defined, at ≥ 32 weeks' gestation in the absence of congenital anomalies, as either (i) estimated fetal weight (EFW) or birth weight (BW) < 3^rd centile, or (ii) EFW < 10^th centile and either uterine artery mean pulsatility index (UtA-PI) > 95^th centile or cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 5^th centile. Neonates with BW < 10^th centile, regardless of prenatal parameters, were defined as SGA. The predictive effectiveness of maternal and first- and second-trimester factors was tested using logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 3520 fetuses were included (late FGR, n = 109 (3.1%); SGA, n = 292 (8.3%)). Of the late FGR cases, 56 (1.6%) fulfilled the antenatal criteria (EFW < 3^rd centile or EFW < 10^th centile plus abnormal UtA-PI or CPR) and were defined as prenatally detected late FGR. A first-trimester screening model (comprising conception method, smoking status, maternal height, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and UtA-PI) could predict 50.0% of the prenatally diagnosed and 36.7% of the overall late FGR fetuses for a 10% false-positive rate (FPR). A model combining first- and second-trimester screening parameters (conception method, smoking status, PAPP-A, second- trimester EFW, head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio and UtA-PI) could predict 78.6% of the prenatally detected, and 59.6% of the overall late FGR fetuses, for a 10% FPR (area under the curve 0.901 (95% CI, 0.856-0.947) and 0.855 (95% CI, 0.818-0.891), respectively). The prediction of SGA was suboptimal for both first-trimester and combined screening.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple model combining maternal and first- and second-trimester predictors can detect 60% of fetuses that will develop late FGR, and 79% of those fetuses that will be classified prenatally as late FGR, for a 10% FPR. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Selective versus universal third trimester ultrasound: Time for a rethink? An audit of current practices at a metropolitan Sydney hospital

INTRODUCTION

Routine third-trimester ultrasound (T3US) is not recommended in evidence-based clinical guidelines despite occurring frequently. This study investigated the incidence, indication for, results and follow-up needs of T3US performed at a Sydney metropolitan teaching hospital.

METHODS

Audit of T3US amongst singleton pregnancies at St George Hospital, Sydney: retrospective review October-December 2012, prospective cohort with clinician survey February-April 2013. Data included are as follows: maternal demographics, aneuploidy screening results, T3US ordering patterns, results, follow-up management and pregnancy outcomes. Comparison of demographic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes was performed for women undergoing T3US vs. no T3US.

RESULTS

One thousand and thirty-five women (623 retrospective, 412 prospective) were included, of whom 560 (54%) received at least one T3US. Characteristics of retrospective and prospective cohorts were similar, so combined data are presented. Most initial T3USs were for valid indications (463 of 560; 83%), most frequently low-lying placenta at morphology (19%), reduced fundal height (10%) and to follow-up fetal concerns at morphology ultrasound (9%). One hundred and sixty-two out of 560 (29%) of initial T3US were not normal, predominantly related to accelerated or reduced fetal growth. Detection of SGA babies was significantly higher in the T3US group (32% SGA babies detected vs. 0% if no T3US, P < 0.001). However, overall detection rates remained low, with 5.2% and 3.0% of babies who had a T3US unexpectedly <10th and <3rd centile birthweight, respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The majority of women received at least one, usually indicated, T3US in routine practice at our metropolitan Sydney hospital. This may impact obstetric care, resource allocation and patient well-being. Detection of small for gestational age fetuses was poor.

Is the fetal cerebroplacental ratio better that the estimated fetal weight in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in a low risk cohort?

OBJECTIVE

In high-risk pregnancies combining the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) with the estimated fetal weight (EFW) improves the identification of vulnerable fetuses. The purpose of this study was to assess the CPR and EFW's ability to predict adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in a low-risk pregnancy, when measured late in gestation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of women who birthed at Mater Mothers Hospitals, Brisbane, Australia between 2010 and 2015. We included all nonanomalous singleton pregnancies that had an ultrasound scan performed between 36 and 38 weeks gestation. Excluded was any major congenital abnormality, aneuploidy, multiple pregnancy, preterm birth, maternal hypertension, or diabetes. The primary outcome was a severe composite neonatal outcome (SCNO) defined as severe acidosis (umbilical cord artery pH <7.0, cord lactate ≥6 mmol/L, cord base excess ≤-12 mmol/L) Apgar score ≤3 at 5 minutes, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and death. A low CPR was defined as <10th centile for gestation and small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as an EFW <10th centile and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) was defined as EFW ≥10th centile.

RESULTS

Of 2425 pregnancies, 13.2% (321/2425) had a fetus with a CPR <10th centile and 13.7% (332/2425) with an EFW <10th centile. Both a low CPR and SGA predicted the SCNO. Individually a low CPR and SGA had sensitivity for detection of SCNO of 23.3% and 24.7%, respectively which increased to 36.7% when combined. Both were associated with emergency caesarean for nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS), as well as early-term birth and admission to NICU. Stratifying the population into EFW <10th centile and EFW ≥10th centile, a low CPR maintained its association with the SCNO, early-term birth and emergency caesarean for NRFS in the cohort with an EFW <10th centile but SCNO lost its association with a low CPR in the EFW >10th cohort. Stratifying the population into CPR <10th centile and CPR >10th centile, a low EFW was associated with early-term birth, induction of labor, admission to NICU, and the SCNO.

CONCLUSIONS

In a low-risk cohort both the CPR and EFW individually and in combination predicts adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes when measured late in pregnancy. However, the predictive value was enhanced when both were used in combination.

Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction

By consensus, late fetal growth restriction is that diagnosed >32 weeks. This condition is mildly associated with a higher risk of perinatal hypoxic events and suboptimal neurodevelopment. Histologically, it is characterized by the presence of uteroplacental vascular lesions (especially infarcts), although the incidence of such lesions is lower than in preterm fetal growth restriction. Screening procedures for fetal growth restriction need to identify small babies and then differentiate between those who are healthy and those who are pathologically small. First- or second-trimester screening strategies provide detection rates for late smallness for gestational age <50% for 10% of false positives. Compared to clinically indicated ultrasonography in the third trimester, universal screening triples the detection rate of late smallness for gestational age. As opposed to early third-trimester ultrasound, scanning late in pregnancy (around 37 weeks) increases the detection rate for birthweight <3rd centile. Contrary to early fetal growth restriction, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry alone does not provide good differentiation between late smallness for gestational age and fetal growth restriction. A combination of biometric parameters (with severe smallness usually defined as estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference <3rd centile) with Doppler criteria of placental insufficiency (either in the maternal [uterine Doppler] or fetal [cerebroplacental ratio] compartments) offers a classification tool that correlates with the risk for adverse perinatal outcome. There is no evidence that induction of late fetal growth restriction at term improves perinatal outcomes nor is it a cost-effective strategy, and it may increase neonatal admission when performed <38 weeks.

Behaviour of the Foramen Ovale Flow in Fetuses with Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Background

Foramen ovale (FO) flow may be altered in IUGR. This study was designed to test this hypothesis.

Methods

Forty pregnant women (24–38 weeks) were divided into 3 groups: group I (IUGR), group II (adequate growth and maternal hypertension), and group III (normal controls). Impedance across the FO was assessed by the FO pulsatility index (FOPI): (systolic velocity − presystolic velocity)/mean velocity. Statistical analysis utilized ANOVA, Tukey test, and ROC curves.

Results

Mean FOPI in IUGR fetuses (n = 15) was 3.70 ± 0.99 (3.15–4.26); in the group II (n = 12), it was 2.84 ± 0.69 (2.40–3.28), and in the group III (n = 13), it was 2.77 ± 0.44 (2.50–3.04) (p=0.004). FOPI and UtA RI were correlated (r = 0.375, p=0.017), as well as FOPI and UA RI (r = 0.356, p=0.024) and, inversely, FOPI and MCA RI (r = −0.359, p=0.023).

Conclusions

The FO flow pulsatility index is increased in fetuses with IUGR, probably as a result of impaired left ventricular diastolic function.

Midwives' and obstetricians' views on appropriate obstetric sonography in Norway

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study was to investigate midwives' and obstetricians' views on how many ultrasound examinations should be part of standard care during pregnancy in Norway.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is a part of a larger study, the CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS), an international investigation of midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of and views on the use of ultrasound. We distributed 400 questionnaires to respondents in all five health regions in Norway: 40 to municipal midwives, 180 to midwives working in hospitals and 180 to obstetricians. The questionnaire included specific questions about the appropriate number of examinations during pregnancy, examinations without medical indication, non-medical ultrasound, commercialisation and safety.

RESULTS

The response rate was 45%. Of the respondents, 58% reported satisfaction with the offer of one scheduled ultrasound examination during pregnancy, as recommended in the Norwegian guidelines. Health care professionals who used ultrasound themselves were significantly more likely to want to offer more ultrasound examinations: 52% of the ultrasound users wanted to offer two or more ultrasound examinations vs. 16% of the non-users (p < .01). The majority of obstetricians (80%) reported that pregnant women expect to undergo ultrasound examination, even in the absence of medical indication.

CONCLUSION

The majority of Norwegian health care professionals participating in this study supported the national recommendation on ultrasound in pregnancy. Ultrasound users wanted to offer more ultrasound examinations during pregnancy, whereas non-users were generally content with the recommendation. The majority of respondents thought that commercialisation was not a problem at their institution, and reported that ultrasound is often performed without a medical indication. The ultrasound users thought that ultrasound is safe.

Evaluation of normalization of cerebro-placental ratio as a potential predictor for adverse outcome in SGA fetuses

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine growth restriction accounts for a significant proportion of perinatal morbidity and mortality currently encountered in obstetric practice. The primary goal of antenatal care is the early recognition of such conditions to allow treatment and optimization of both maternal and fetal outcomes. Management of pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction remains one of the greatest challenges in obstetrics. Frequently, however, clinical evidence of underlying uteroplacental dysfunction may only emerge at a late stage in the disease process. With advanced disease the only therapeutic intervention is delivery of the fetus and placenta. The cerebroplacental ratio is gaining much interest as a useful tool in differentiating the at-risk fetus in both intrauterine growth restriction and the appropriate-for-gestational-age setting. The cerebroplacental ratio quantifies the redistribution of the cardiac output resulting in a brain-sparing effect. The Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in Intrauterine Growth Restriction group previously demonstrated that the presence of a brain-sparing effect is significantly associated with an adverse perinatal outcome in the intrauterine growth restriction cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in Intrauterine Growth Restriction study was to evaluate the optimal management of fetuses with an estimated fetal weight <10th centile. The objective of this secondary analysis was to evaluate if normalizing cerebroplacental ratio predicts adverse perinatal outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

In all, 1116 consecutive singleton pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction completed the study protocol over 2 years at 7 centers, undergoing serial sonographic evaluation and multivessel Doppler measurement. Cerebroplacental ratio was calculated using the pulsatility and resistance indices of the middle cerebral and umbilical artery. Abnormal cerebroplacental ratio was defined as <1.0. Adverse perinatal outcome was defined as a composite of intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis, and death.

RESULTS

Data for cerebroplacental ratio calculation were available in 881 cases, with a mean gestational age of 33 (interquartile range, 28.7-35.9) weeks. Of the 87 cases of abnormal serial cerebroplacental ratio with an initial value <1.0, 52% (n = 45) of cases remained abnormal and 22% of these (n = 10) had an adverse perinatal outcome. The remaining 48% (n = 42) demonstrated normalizing cerebroplacental ratio on serial sonography, and 5% of these (n = 2) had an adverse perinatal outcome. Mean gestation at delivery was 33.4 weeks (n = 45) in the continuing abnormal cerebroplacental ratio group and 36.5 weeks (n = 42) in the normalizing cerebroplacental ratio group (P value <.001).

CONCLUSION

The Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in Intrauterine Growth Restriction group previously demonstrated that the presence of a brain-sparing effect was significantly associated with an adverse perinatal outcome in our intrauterine growth restriction cohort. It was hypothesized that a normalizing cerebroplacental ratio would be a further predictor of an adverse outcome due to the loss of this compensatory mechanism. However, in this subanalysis we did not demonstrate an additional poor prognostic effect when the cerebroplacental ratio value returned to a value >1.0. Overall, this secondary analysis demonstrated the importance of a serial abnormal cerebroplacental ratio value of <1 within the <34 weeks' gestation population. Contrary to our proposed hypothesis, we recognize that reversion of an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio to a normal ratio is not associated with a heightened degree of adverse perinatal outcome.

Changes in uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and circulating angiogenic factors in the first half of pregnancies delivering a small-for-gestational-age neonate

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between longitudinal changes in placental Doppler indices and maternal circulating angiogenic factors in the first half of pregnancy and delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate, and ascertain whether longitudinal evaluation of these variables improves the prediction achieved by second-trimester cross-sectional evaluation.

METHODS

From a prospective cohort of unselected singleton pregnancies undergoing first-trimester screening for aneuploidy, 138 were included in this study. Of these, 46 were complicated by SGA (delivering after 34 weeks' gestation with a birth weight < 10^th centile) and 92 were appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) pregnancies, which were included as controls (ratio 1:2). First-to-second trimester longitudinal changes in uterine artery (UtA) Doppler indices and maternal circulating levels of placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the AGA group, SGA pregnancies had significantly higher UtA impedance in the first (Z-score: 0.46 vs -0.57; P < 0.001) and second (Z-score: 1.71 vs -0.75; P < 0.001) trimesters. Likewise, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was significantly higher in SGA than in AGA pregnancies in the first (98.0 vs 67.9; P = 0.01) and early second (22.4 vs 8.8; P < 0.001) trimesters. The predictive performance of the longitudinal changes in UtA Doppler indices for SGA was significantly lower than that of second-trimester cross-sectional values (area under receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), 60.8% vs 84.3%; P = 0.0035). The detection rate of SGA, at a 10% false-positive rate (FPR), was 17.7% by longitudinal changes in UtA Doppler and 56.2% by second-trimester cross-sectional UtA Doppler values. Similarly, the predictive performance of the longitudinal changes in PlGF was significantly lower than that of early second-trimester cross-sectional values (AUC, 71.4% vs 76.5%; P = 0.008). The detection rate of SGA at a 10% FPR was 40.6% when screening by longitudinal changes in PlGF and 52.1% when screening by early second-trimester cross-sectional values.

CONCLUSIONS

First- and second-trimester UtA Doppler velocimetry and maternal circulating angiogenic markers have clinical utility as a cross-sectional assessment for the identification of pregnancies at high risk of delivering a SGA neonate, however, they do not improve prediction when their longitudinal changes are used. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval

OBJECTIVES

To compare third-trimester ultrasound screening methods to predict small-for-gestational age (SGA), and to evaluate the impact of the ultrasound-delivery interval on screening performance.

METHODS

In this prospective study, data were collected from a multicenter singleton cohort study investigating the links between various exposures during pregnancy with birth outcome and later health in children. We included women, recruited in the first trimester, who had complete outcome data and had undergone third-trimester ultrasound examination. Demographic, clinical and biological variables were also collected from both parents. We compared prediction of delivery of a SGA neonate (birth weight < 10^th percentile) by the following methods: abdominal circumference (AC) Z-score based on Hadlock curves (Hadlock AC), on INTERGROWTH-21^st Project curves (Intergrowth AC) and on Salomon curves (Salomon AC); estimated fetal weight (EFW) Z-score based on Hadlock curves (Hadlock EFW) and on customized curves from Gardosi (Gardosi EFW); and fetal growth velocity based on change in AC between second and third trimesters (FGVAC). We also assessed the following ultrasound-delivery intervals: ≤ 4 weeks, ≤ 6 weeks and ≤ 10 weeks.

RESULTS

Third-trimester ultrasound was performed in 1805 patients with complete outcome data, of whom 158 (8.8%) delivered a SGA neonate. Ultrasound examination was at a median gestational age of 32 (interquartile range, 31-33) weeks. The ultrasound-delivery interval was ≤ 4 weeks in 17.2% of cases, ≤ 6 weeks in 48.1% of cases and ≤ 10 weeks in 97.3% of cases. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) were 0.772 for Salomon AC, 0.768 for Hadlock EFW, 0.766 for Hadlock AC, 0.765 for Intergrowth AC, 0.708 for Gardosi EFW and 0.674 for FGVAC (all P < 0.0001). The screening method with the highest AUC for an ultrasound-delivery interval ≤ 4 weeks was Salomon AC (AUC, 0.856), ≤ 6 weeks was Hadlock AC (AUC, 0.824) and ≤ 10 weeks was Salomon AC (AUC, 0.780). At a fixed 10% false-positive rate, the best detection rates were 60.0%, 54.1% and 42.1% for intervals ≤ 4, ≤ 6 and ≤ 10 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Third-trimester ultrasound measurements provide poor to moderate prediction of SGA. A shorter ultrasound-delivery interval provides better prediction than does a longer interval. Further studies are needed to test the effect of including maternal or biological characteristics in SGA screening. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Infants in Healthy Nulliparous Women Using Clinical and Ultrasound Risk Factors Combined with Early Pregnancy Biomarkers

Objective

Most small for gestational age pregnancies are unrecognised before birth, resulting in substantial avoidable perinatal mortality and morbidity. Our objective was to develop multivariable prediction models for small for gestational age combining clinical risk factors and biomarkers at 15±1 weeks’ with ultrasound parameters at 20±1 weeks’ gestation.

Methods

Data from 5606 participants in the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) cohort study were divided into Training (n = 3735) and Validation datasets (n = 1871). The primary outcomes were All-SGA (small for gestational age with birthweight <10th customised centile), Normotensive-SGA (small for gestational age with a normotensive mother) and Hypertensive-SGA (small for gestational age with an hypertensive mother). The comparison group comprised women without the respective small for gestational age phenotype. Multivariable analysis was performed using stepwise logistic regression beginning with clinical variables, and subsequent additions of biomarker and then ultrasound (biometry and Doppler) variables. Model performance was assessed in Training and Validation datasets by calculating area under the curve.

Results

633 (11.2%) infants were All-SGA, 465(8.2%) Normotensive-SGA and 168 (3%) Hypertensive-SGA. Area under the curve (95% Confidence Intervals) for All-SGA using 15±1 weeks’ clinical variables, 15±1 weeks’ clinical+ biomarker variables and clinical + biomarkers + biometry /Doppler at 20±1 weeks’ were: 0.63 (0.59–0.67), 0.64 (0.60–0.68) and 0.69 (0.66–0.73) respectively in the Validation dataset; Normotensive-SGA results were similar: 0.61 (0.57–0.66), 0.61 (0.56–0.66) and 0.68 (0.64–0.73) with small increases in performance in the Training datasets. Area under the curve (95% Confidence Intervals) for Hypertensive-SGA were: 0.76 (0.70–0.82), 0.80 (0.75–0.86) and 0.84 (0.78–0.89) with minimal change in the Training datasets.

Conclusion

Models for prediction of small for gestational age, which combine biomarkers, clinical and ultrasound data from a cohort of low-risk nulliparous women achieved modest performance. Incorporation of biomarkers into the models resulted in no improvement in performance of prediction of All-SGA and Normotensive-SGA but a small improvement in prediction of Hypertensive-SGA. Our models currently have insufficient reliability for application in clinical practice however, they have potential utility in two-staged screening tests which include third trimester biomarkers and or fetal biometry.

An integrated approach to fetal growth restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is among the most common complications of pregnancy. FGR is associated with placental insufficiency and poor perinatal outcomes. Clinical management is challenging because of variability in clinical presentation. Fetal smallness (estimated fetal weight <10th centile for gestational age) remains the best clinical surrogate for FGR. However, it is commonly accepted that not all forms of fetal smallness represent true FGR. In a significant subset of small fetuses, there is no evidence of placental involvement, perinatal outcomes are nearly normal, and they are clinically referred to as "only" small for gestational age (SGA). Doppler may improve the clinical management of FGR; however, the need to use several parameters sometimes results in a number of combinations that may render interpretation challenging when translating into clinical decisions. We propose that the management of FGR can be simplified using a sequential approach based on three steps: (1) identification of the "small fetus," (2) differentiation between FGR and SGA, and (3) timing of delivery according to a protocol based on stages of fetal deterioration.