Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study

Is intermediate risk really intermediate? Comparison of karyotype and non-invasive prenatal testing results of pregnancies at intermediate risk of trisomy 21 on maternal serum screening

The purpose of this study was to assess the additional contribution of karyotyping compared with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for pregnancies at intermediate risk for trisomy 21 (T21), calculated using the maternal serum screening without major structural anomalies detected through sonography. Karyotype results of all pregnancies undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing between January 2013 and March 2022 were obtained from a large hospital-based laboratory. Pregnancies with no major structural anomalies on ultrasound (including soft markers) and an intermediate risk for T21 on maternal serum screening were included in this study. The additional contribution of karyotyping for abnormal karyotype results was calculated after excluding results that could theoretically be identified with genome-wide NIPT. Among the 511 pregnancies analyzed, 13 (2.54%) were found to have abnormal karyotype results, 9 (1.76%) of which could theoretically have been detected with genome-wide NIPT. Within the cohort, 6/263 (2.28%) of women aged 35 years and older, and 3/248 (1.20%) of women younger than 35 years had results that could have been detected with genome-wide NIPT. After excluding results detectable using genome-wide NIPT, the additional contribution of karyotyping was found as 4/502 (0.79%) for the entire cohort, 2/257 (0.77%) for women aged 35 years and older, 2/245 (0.81%) for women younger than 35 years. Of the 511 examined pregnancies at intermediate risk for T21 by maternal serum screening, genome-wide NIPT would have failed to detect 4 of 13 abnormal karyotype results. The findings hold importance in guiding couples' informed decision-making processes regarding their choice of genetic screening and diagnostic testing in case of intermediate risk for T21.

ISUOG/ESGO Consensus Statement on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) with the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on performing ultrasound-guided biopsies in gynecological oncology. The objective of this Consensus Statement is to assist clinicians, including gynecological sonographers, gynecological oncologists and radiologists, to achieve the best standards of practice in ultrasound-guided biopsy procedures. ISUOG/ESGO nominated a multidisciplinary international group of 16 experts who have demonstrated leadership in the use of ultrasound-guided biopsy in the clinical management of patients with gynecological cancer. In addition, two early-career gynecological fellows were nominated to participate from the European Network of Young Gynae Oncologists (ENYGO) within ESGO and from ISUOG. The group also included a patient representative from the European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups. The document is divided into six sections: (1) general recommendations; (2) image-guided biopsy (imaging guidance, sampling methods); (3) indications and contraindications; (4) technique; (5) reporting; and (6) training and quality assurance. To ensure that the statements are evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on this review of the literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement, and a first round of voting was carried out. The group achieved consensus on all 46 preliminary statements without the need for revision. These ISUOG/ESGO statements on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement, are presented herein. This Consensus Statement is supplemented by detailed narrated videoclips presenting different approaches and indications for ultrasound-guided biopsy, a patient leaflet, and an extended version which includes a detailed review of the evidence.

ISUOG/ESGO Consensus Statement on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) with the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on performing ultrasound-guided biopsies in gynecological oncology. The objective of this Consensus Statement is to assist clinicians, including gynecological sonographers, gynecological oncologists and radiologists, to achieve the best standards of practice in ultrasound-guided biopsy procedures. ISUOG/ESGO nominated a multidisciplinary international group of 16 experts who have demonstrated leadership in the use of ultrasound-guided biopsy in the clinical management of patients with gynecological cancer. In addition, two early-career gynecological fellows were nominated to participate from the European Network of Young Gynae Oncologists (ENYGO) within ESGO and from ISUOG. The group also included a patient representative from the European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups. The document is divided into six sections: (1) general recommendations; (2) image-guided biopsy (imaging guidance, sampling methods); (3) indications and contraindications; (4) technique; (5) reporting; and (6) training and quality assurance. To ensure that the statements are evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on this review of the literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement, and a first round of voting was carried out. The group achieved consensus on all 46 preliminary statements without the need for revision. These ISUOG/ESGO statements on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement, are presented herein. This Consensus Statement is supplemented by detailed narrated videoclips presenting different approaches and indications for ultrasound-guided biopsy, a patient leaflet, and an extended version which includes a detailed review of the evidence. © 2025 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society.

Consecutive 5-year outcomes of chorionic villus sampling at a tertiary center

This study shares our 5-year experience with chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and analyzes the indications, results, and complications of this procedure. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from singleton pregnancies that underwent CVS between 2015 and 2020 at the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit of Health Science University, Izmir Tepecik Research, and Training Hospital. Maternal demographics, indications, karyotype results, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. We retrospectively analyzed data from 468 CVS procedures, conducted between 2015 and 2020. The most common indications for CVS were positive screening test results in the first trimester, fetal structural abnormalities, and increased nuchal translucency (NT) observed during ultrasound. Fetal structural abnormalities had the highest detection rate, at 34.5% for chromosomal abnormalities, followed by increased NT and first-trimester screen-positive test results (26.9% and 11.3%), respectively. The culture success rate was 96.3% (451 out of 468). The most prevalent chromosomal abnormalities were numerical, including Trisomy 21 (10.9%), Trisomy 18 (4.2%), and Trisomy 13 (1.9%). Results could not be obtained in 17 patients (3.6%); 12 (2.5%) were due to insufficient samples and culture failure, while 5 (1.06%) were due to maternal contamination. Amniocentesis was required as a secondary sampling in 24 cases (5.1%) and performed in 17 cases (3.6%). This study emphasizes the significance of CVS in prenatal diagnosis and the management of high-risk pregnancies. However, we must be aware of the associated risks and limitations, which include culture success rates, inconclusive results, and the occasional need for secondary sampling.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal and Monogenic Disease by a Novel Bioinspired Micro-Nanochip for Isolating Fetal Nucleated Red Blood Cells

Purpose

Fetal nucleated red blood cells (fNRBCs) in the peripheral blood of pregnant women contain comprehensive fetal genetic information, making them an ideal target for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD). However, challenges in identifying, enriching, and detecting fNRBCs limit their diagnostic potential.

Methods

To overcome these obstacles, we developed a novel biomimetic chip, replicating the micro-nano structure of red rose petals on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The surface was modified with gelatin nanoparticles (GNPs) and affinity antibodies to enhance cell adhesion and facilitate specific cell identification. We subsequently investigated the chip's characteristics, along with its in vitro capture and release system, and conducted further experiments using peripheral blood samples from pregnant women.

Results

In the cell line capture and release assay, the chip achieved a cell capture efficiency of 90.4%. Following metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) enzymatic degradation, the release efficiency was 84.08%, with cell viability at 85.97%. Notably, fNRBCs can be captured from the peripheral blood of pregnant women as early as 7 weeks of gestation. We used these fNRBCs to diagnose a case of single-gene disease and instances of chromosomal aneuploidies, yielding results consistent with those obtained from amniotic fluid punctures.

Conclusion

This novel chip not only enables efficient enrichment of fNRBCs for NIPD but also extends the diagnostic window for genetic and developmental disorders to as early as 7 weeks of gestation, potentially allowing for earlier interventions. By improving the accuracy and reliability of NIPD, this technology could reduce reliance on invasive diagnostic techniques, offering a new pathway for diagnosing fetal genetic conditions in clinical practice.

Prediction of chromosomal abnormalities in the screening of the first trimester of pregnancy using machine learning methods: a study protocol

BACKGROUND

For women in the first trimester, amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling is recommended for screening. Machine learning has shown increased accuracy over time and finds numerous applications in enhancing decision-making, patient care, and service quality in nursing and midwifery. This study aims to develop an optimal learning model utilizing machine learning techniques, particularly neural networks, to predict chromosomal abnormalities and evaluate their predictive efficacy.

METHODS/ DESIGN

This cross-sectional study will be conducted in midwifery clinics in Mashhad, Iran in 2024. The data will be collected from 350 pregnant women in the high-risk group who underwent screening tests in the first trimester (between 11-14 weeks) of pregnancy. Information collected includes maternal age, BMI, smoking habits, history of trisomy 21 and other chromosomal disorders, CRL and NT levels, PAPP-A and B-HCG levels, presence of insulin-dependent diabetes, and whether the pregnancy resulted from IVF. The study follows up with the women during their clinic visits and tracks the results of amniocentesis. Sampling is based on Convenience Sampling, and data is gathered using a checklist of characteristics and screening/amniocentesis results. After preprocessing, feature extraction is conducted to identify and predict relevant features. The model is trained and evaluated using K-fold cross-validation.

DISCUSSION

There is a growing interest in utilizing artificial intelligence methods, like machine learning and deep learning, in nursing and midwifery. This underscores the critical necessity for nurses and midwives to be well-versed in artificial intelligence methods and their healthcare applications. It can be beneficial to develop a machine learning model, specifically focusing on neural networks, for predicting chromosomal abnormalities.

ETHICAL CODE

IR.MUMS.NURSE.REC. 1402.134.

Is Amniocentesis after CVS Risky?

OBJECTIVE

Approximately, 2% of women who undergo chorionic villi sampling (CVS) will subsequently undergo amniocentesis due to placental mosaicism or sampling/laboratory issues. Our objective was to compare obstetric outcomes in women who underwent both procedures with those who had CVS alone.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study of patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing invasive testing from 2010 to 2020 was performed. All women who underwent CVS followed by amniocentesis were compared with a control group who underwent CVS alone matched (2:1) for age and year of pregnancy. Women with pregnancy loss at <16 weeks were excluded from the control group. Pregnancies terminated for genetic abnormalities were excluded. Obstetric outcomes were compared between cases and controls. Student t-test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

During the study period 2,539 women underwent CVS, and 66 (2.6%) subsequently underwent amniocentesis. The 66 cases were compared with 132 age-matched controls who underwent CVS alone. Mean maternal age was 36.8 ± 3.4 years, and 43% of women were nulliparous. Amniocentesis was performed due to sampling or laboratory issues in 33% of cases, placental mosaicism in 44%, and further diagnostic testing in 23%. There were no pregnancy losses or stillbirths in either group. Those who had two invasive procedures delivered at similar gestational ages and birthweights and did not have higher rates of adverse outcomes compared with those who underwent CVS alone.

CONCLUSION

Patients considering CVS who are concerned about the possibility that a second invasive procedure could be required should be reassured that this does not appear to be associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes. Due to study size, we cannot exclude the possibility of small differences in uncommon outcomes, such as pregnancy loss or stillbirth.

KEY POINTS

· Amniocentesis may be recommended after CVS due to mosaicism, sampling issues, or further testing.. · Amniocentesis after CVS is not associated with pregnancy loss or other adverse outcomes compared.. · Patients who have both CVS and amniocentesis deliver at similar gestational ages and birthweights..

Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of SEA-Thalassemia by Combining 1000 Genomes Database and Relative Haplotype Dosage

To explore a noninvasive method for diagnosis of SEA-thalassemia and to investigate whether the regional factors affect the accuracy of this method. The method involved using a public database and bioinformatics software to construct parental haplotypes for proband and predicting fetal genotypes using relative haplotype dosage. We screened and downloaded sequencing data of couples who were both SEA-thalassemia carriers from the China National Genebank public data platform, and matched the sequencing data format with that of the reference panel using Ubuntu system tools. We then used Beagle software to construct parental haplotypes, predicted fetal haplotypes by relative haplotype dosage. Finally, we used Hidden Markov Model and Viterbi algorithm to determine fetal pathogenic haplotypes. All noninvasive fetal genotype diagnosis results were compared with gold standard gap-PCR electrophoresis results. Our method was successful in diagnosing 13 families with SEA-thalassemia carriers. The best diagnostic results were obtained when Southern Chinese Han was used as the reference panel, and 10 families showed full agreement between our noninvasive diagnostic results and the gap-PCR electrophoresis results. The accuracy of our method was higher when using a Chinese Han as the reference panel for haplotype construction in the Southern Chinese Han region as opposed to Beijing Chinese region. The combined use of public databases and relative haplotype dosage for diagnosing SEA-thalassemia is a feasible approach. Our method produces the best noninvasive diagnostic results when the test samples and population reference panel are closely matched in both ethnicity and geography. When constructing parental haplotypes with our method, it is important to consider the effect of region in addition to population background alone.

Exploring factors impacting haplotype-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene recessive disorders

Haplotype-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) is applicable for various recessive single-gene disorders in proband families. However, a comprehensive exploration of critical factors influencing the assay performance, such as fetal fraction, informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) count, and recombination events, has yet to be performed. It is critical to identify key factors affecting NIPD performance, including its accuracy and success rate, and their impact on clinical diagnostics to guide clinical practice. We conducted a prospective study, recruiting 219 proband families with singleton pregnancies at risk for eight recessive single-gene disorders (Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, phenylketonuria, methylmalonic acidemia, hemophilia A, hemophilia B, non-syndromic hearing loss, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia) at 7-14 weeks of gestation. Haplotype-based NIPD was performed by evaluating the relative haplotype dosage (RHDO) in maternal circulation, and the results were validated via invasive prenatal diagnosis or newborn follow-ups. Among the 219 families, the median gestational age at first blood draw was 8+5 weeks. Initial testing succeeded for 190 families and failed for 29 due to low fetal fraction (16), insufficient informative SNPs (9), and homologous recombination near pathogenic variation (4). Among low fetal fraction families, successful testing was achieved for 11 cases after a redraw, while 5 remained inconclusive. Test failures linked to insufficient informative SNPs correlated with linkage disequilibrium near the genes, with F8 and MMUT exhibiting the highest associated failure rates (14.3% and 25%, respectively). Homologous recombination was relatively frequent around the DMD and SMN1 genes (8.8% and 4.8%, respectively) but led to detection failure in only 44.4% (4/9) of such cases. All NIPD results from the 201 successful families were consistent with invasive diagnostic findings or newborn follow-up. Fetal fraction, informative SNPs count, and homologous recombination are pivotal to NIPD performance. Redrawing blood effectively improves the success rate for low fetal fraction samples. However, informative SNPs count and homologous recombination rates vary significantly across genes, necessitating careful consideration in clinical practice. We have designed an in silico method based on linkage disequilibrium data to predict the number of informative SNPs. This can identify genomic regions where there might be an insufficient number of SNPs, thereby guiding panel design. With these factors properly accounted for, NIPD is highly accurate and reliable.

A Low-Cost, High-Fidelity Simulator for Transabdominal Chorionic Villus Sampling

INTRODUCTION

Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) remains essential for first-trimester genetic diagnosis, yet clinical volume may be insufficient to train new clinicians in the technique. Available simulation models are expensive, require animal parts or specialized resins, and cannot be stored for repeated use.

METHODS

We present a model for trans-abdominal CVS (TA-CVS) which is constructed from readily available materials costing less than $10 and can be refrigerated and re-used to train maternal-fetal medicine fellows in CVS.

RESULTS

All three attending physicians performing TA-CVS at our institution described the model as an accurate visual and tactile simulation, prompting its integration into our fellowship curriculum. To date, two senior fellows have achieved competency on the simulator and begun to perform clinical CVS under supervision, one of whom is an author on this paper. Both fellows and attendings indicated that the simulator provided a valuable tool for repeated practice prior to clinical CVS. Simulators are now maintained on the unit and have been re-used for 3 months and dozens of simulated procedures each without any apparent qualitative degradation in performance.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

We describe a low-cost easily constructed, durable, high-fidelity simulator for TA-CVS.

Evaluation of Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Chorion Villus Sampling (CVS)

Background

Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) is one of the invasive diagnostic methods used to diagnose chromosomal, genetic, and metabolic diseases in the embryonic period. The use of this method is associated with maternal and fetal consequences, the most serious of which is abortion. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the incidence of these consequences and the factors affecting the incidence of abortion.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed on 98 pregnant women with CVS indications. Maternal and fetal outcomes including abortion, vaginal bleeding, subchorionic hematoma, premature rupture of membrane (PROM), chorioamnionitis, preterm delivery, limb abnormality, fetal growth retardation, and preeclampsia were recorded.

Results

The results of the present study showed that the incidence of fetal outcomes including fetal growth failure, premature rupture of membranes, abortion, and limb abnormalities was 4.1%, 7.1%, 3.1%, and 1%, and the incidence of maternal outcomes including preterm delivery, subchorionic hematoma, preeclampsia, and hemorrhage was 14.3%, 3.1%, 6.1%, and 10.2%, respectively. In addition, a decrease in free BHCG and an increase in NT were significantly associated with the occurrence of abortion (OR: 0.11 and 4.25, respectively, P value < 0.05).

Conclusion

It should be noted that due to a long time between placental sampling and the occurrence of vaginal bleeding, premature rupture of membrane, and preterm delivery, it seems that placental sampling has no effect. In addition, only a decrease in free BHCG or an increase in NT significantly increased the chance of miscarriage.

Reappraisal of evolving methods in non-invasive prenatal screening: Discovery, biology and clinical utility

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) offers an opportunity to screen or determine features associated with the fetus. Earlier, prenatal testing was done with cytogenetic procedures like karyotyping or fluorescence in-situ hybridization, which necessitated invasive methods such as fetal blood sampling, chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Over the last two decades, there has been a paradigm shift away from invasive prenatal diagnostic methods to non-invasive ones. NIPS tests heavily rely on cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA). This DNA is released into the maternal circulation by placenta. Like cffDNA, fetal cells such as nucleated red blood cells, placental trophoblasts, leukocytes, and exosomes or fetal RNA circulating in maternal plasma, have enormous potential in non-invasive prenatal testing, but their use is still limited due to a number of limitations. Non-invasive approaches currently use circulating fetal DNA to assess the fetal genetic milieu. Methods with an acceptable detection rate and specificity such as sequencing, methylation, or PCR, have recently gained popularity in NIPS. Now that NIPS has established clinical significance in prenatal screening and diagnosis, it is critical to gain insights into and comprehend the genesis of NIPS de novo. The current review reappraises the development and emergence of non-invasive prenatal screen/test approaches, as well as their clinical application, with a focus, on the scope, benefits, and limitations.

Accuracy of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy in Families at Risk: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Methodological advancements, such as relative haplotype and relative mutation dosage analyses, have enabled non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of autosomal recessive and X-linked diseases. Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive disease characterized by progressive proximal muscular dystrophy and a high mortality rate before the age of twenty. We aimed to systematically present obtainable data regarding a non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of DMD and provide a comprehensive resume on the topic. The emphasis was given to the comparison of different available protocols and molecular methods used for fetal inheritance deduction, as well as their correlation with prognostic accuracy.

METHODS

We searched the Scopus and PubMed databases on 11 November 2022 and included articles reporting a non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of DMD in families at risk using relative dosage analysis methods.

RESULTS

Of the 342 articles identified, 7 met the criteria. The reported accuracy of NIPT for DMD was 100% in all of the studies except one, which demonstrated an accuracy of 86.67%. The combined accuracy for studies applying indirect RHDO, direct RHDO, and RMD approaches were 94.74%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Confirmatory results by invasive testing were available in all the cases. Regardless of the technological complexity and low prevalence of the disease that reduces the opportunity for systematic research, the presented work demonstrates substantial accuracy of NIPT for DMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Attempts for its implementation into everyday clinical practice raise many ethical and social concerns. It is essential to provide detailed guidelines and arrange genetic counseling in order to ensure the proper indications for testing and obtain informed parental consent.

Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Aneuploidies in Singleton Pregnancies: A Comparative Review of Major Guidelines

Sophisticated screening protocols for genetic abnormalities constitute an important component of current prenatal care, aiming to identify high-risk pregnancies and offer appropriate counseling to parents regarding their options. Definite prenatal diagnosis is only possible by invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (IPDT), mainly including amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling (CVS). The aim of this comparative review was to summarize and compare the existing recommendations on IPDT from the most influential guidelines. All the reviewed guidelines highlight that IPDT is indicated based on a positive screening test rather than maternal age alone. Other indications arise from medical history and sonography, with significant variations identified between the guidelines. The earlier time for amniocentesis is unequivocally set at ≥15 gestational weeks, whereas for CVS, the earlier limit varies from ≥10 to ≥11 weeks. Certain technical aspects and the overall approach demonstrate significant differences. Periprocedural management regarding Rhesus alloimmunization, virologic status and use of anesthesia or antibiotics are either inconsistent or insufficiently addressed. The synthesis of an evidence-based algorithm for IPDT is of crucial importance to healthcare professionals implicated in prenatal care to avoid unnecessary interventions without compromising optimal prenatal care.

Noninvasive prenatal testing: How far can we reach detecting fetal copy number variations

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is currently the best screening test for fetal chromosome abnormalities with the highest sensitivity and specificity and can be done from 10 weeks gestation. We report a detection of 44.7 Mb duplication at 11p15.5-p11.2 by NIPT with a fetal fraction (FF) of only 3%. This chromosome abnormality was confirmed after amniocentesis by karyotyping and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on cultured fetal cells. Further parental investigation showed that the fetal chromosome abnormality was inherited from the mother who was a carrier of a balanced translocation 46,XX,t(11;X)(p11.2;q28). This case highlights the importance of expanded NIPT in the detection of fetal segmental aneuploidy. NIPT together with complementary studies can lead to the detection of parental chromosome rearrangement despite a low FF, which can impact the couple's reproductive plans. We also reviewed other cases with chromosome rearrangement, detected by NIPT, derived from a parental reciprocal translocation.

Maternal-fetal medicine fellows' perception and comfort with obstetrical ultrasound and prenatal diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound training is a vital component of maternal-fetal medicine fellowships in the United States. Of the 18 months of core clinical training, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology currently requires a minimum of 3 months to be dedicated to ultrasound to be eligible for board certification. However, the experience and degree of hands-on training differ among the fellowship programs and have not been reassessed for nearly a decade.

OBJECTIVE

To assess regional heterogeneity in the ultrasound training experience during maternal-fetal medicine fellowship in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

A survey was distributed to postgraduate year (PGY)-6 maternal-fetal medicine fellows registered to attend an annual ultrasound training course before the conference (n=114). For programs with >1 fellow attending (n=39), only 1 of them completed the survey to represent the program. The questions included demographics of the program, ultrasound training structure, the fellows' self-perception of ultrasound capabilities, research, mentorship, and technical aspects of sonography.

RESULTS

Seventy two postgraduate year 6 fellows with a wide geographic distribution as follows completed the survey (96% response rate): 10 (14%) from the West, 16 (22%) from the Midwest, 17 (24%) from the South, and 29 (40%) from the Northeast. Respondents undergoing training in the South were less likely to report feeling comfortable performing nuchal translucency and detailed anatomic surveys than those from other regions (nuchal translucency: P=.046; anatomy: P=.011). Most of the respondents reported feeling comfortable performing growth (78%) and umbilical artery Doppler (58%) and feeling uncomfortable with three-dimensional ultrasound, neurosonography, and fetal echocardiography. Respondents in the Northeast were more likely to report feeling comfortable performing chorionic villus sampling (P=.001). There was no difference among fellowship programs in the presence or absence of ultrasound curriculum, bedside teaching, ultrasound-focused research mentorship, or months of ultrasound training.

CONCLUSION

Despite the standardization of ultrasound training structure across the United States, there remains regional heterogeneity in fellow self-reported comfort with specific ultrasound techniques and chorionic villus sampling at a midpoint in their fellowship training. The maternal-fetal medicine attending involvement at the bedside did not affect the fellow self-reported comfort with ultrasound surveys. This study highlights the need for further optimization of maternal-fetal medicine fellowship ultrasound training, especially in advanced sonography and diagnostic procedures.

Haplotype-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of 21 Families With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Real-World Clinical Data in China

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of single-gene disorders has recently become the focus of clinical laboratories. However, reports on the clinical application of NIPD of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the detection performance of haplotype-based NIPD of DMD in a real clinical environment. Twenty-one DMD families at 7-12 weeks of gestation were prospectively recruited. DNA libraries of cell-free DNA from the pregnant and genomic DNA from family members were captured using a custom assay for the enrichment of DMD gene exons and spanning single-nucleotide polymorphisms, followed by next-generation sequencing. Parental haplotype phasing was based on family linkage analysis, and fetal genotyping was inferred using the Bayes factor through target maternal plasma sequencing. Finally, the entire experimental process was promoted in the local clinical laboratory. We recruited 13 complete families, 6 families without paternal samples, and 2 families without probands in which daughter samples were collected. Two different maternal haplotypes were constructed based on family members in all 21 pedigrees at as early as 7 gestational weeks. Among the included families, the fetal genotypes of 20 families were identified at the first blood collection, and a second blood collection was performed for another family due to low fetal concentration. The NIPD result of each family was reported within 1 week. The fetal fraction in maternal cfDNA ranged from 1.87 to 11.68%. In addition, recombination events were assessed in two fetuses. All NIPD results were concordant with the findings of invasive prenatal diagnosis (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis). Exon capture and haplotype-based NIPD of DMD are regularly used for DMD genetic diagnosis, carrier screening, and noninvasive prenatal diagnosis in the clinic. Our method, haplotype-based early screening for DMD fetal genotyping via cfDNA sequencing, has high feasibility and accuracy, a short turnaround time, and is inexpensive in a real clinical environment.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of trichorionic triplet pregnancies with expectant management

INTRODUCTION

Reproductive endocrinologists recommend selective multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) to save at least one or two babies, because triplet pregnancy is known to increase the risk of miscarriage and preterm delivery. However, recently improved obstetric and neonatal care may affect pregnancy outcomes differently in triplet pregnancies, which could alter practice. We compared the maternal, perinatal, and long-term outcomes of triplet pregnancies managed expectantly with those of pregnancies reduced to twins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the clinical records of 552 trichorionic triplet pregnancies for obstetric, perinatal, and neurodevelopmental outcomes, which consisted of the expectant management (EM) group (n = 225) and MFPR group (n = 327), in Seoul National University Hospital and CHA Bundang Medical Center from January 2006 to December 2018. Neuromotor development was evaluated using the Korean-Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Bayley-III tests, and/or Gross Motor Function Measure. The two groups were compared for the following outcomes: (1) nonviable pregnancy loss before 23 weeks, (2) preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation, (3) fetal and neonatal survival and (4) long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no differences in maternal age, body mass index, nulliparity or previous preterm birth between the two groups. The risk of nonviable pregnancy loss was lower in the EM group than that in the MFPR group (2 [0.9%] vs 21 [6.4%], p = 0.001). The risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation was lower in the MFPR group (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.73, p = 0.001). The survival rate of neonates until discharge (644 [95.4%] vs 572 [87.5], p < 0.001) and the rate of pregnancies with at least one survivor (220 [97.8%] vs 301 [92.0], p = 0.002) were higher in the EM group than those in the MFPR group. In the MFPR group, the risk of developmental delay (aOR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.38-6.02, p = 0.005) was higher.

CONCLUSIONS

In trichorionic triplet pregnancies, the possibility of EM to improve survival and reduce the risk of developmental delay has been shown.

Evaluation of the Fetal Therapy Evidence in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction: Would an ERAS Guideline Improve Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Pregnancies that are prenatally identified to have fetal anomalies are complex and require expert multidisciplinary care. As many conditions can impact the fetus prenatally and require intervention, an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) is being evaluated to determine the level of evidenced-based data available.

PROBLEM

The percutaneous ultrasound-guided fetal surgery procedure for bladder neck obstruction is the focus for elements of preoperative counseling, intraoperative procedure/risk complications, and postoperative management.

METHODS

A quality improvement review Squire 2.0 (2000-2020) was undertaken for the percutaneous LUTO fetal surgery shunting (lower urinary tract obstruction), process and procedure which require 2 process pathways, one to evaluate the fetal candidate and a second to treat. This structured review is focused on identifying the process elements to allow the determination of the number of evidenced-based elements that would allow for audit and measurement of the clinical element variance for comparative feedback to the individual surgical provider or surgery center.

INTERVENTIONS

Titles and abstracts were screened to identify potentially relevant articles with priority given to meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled studies, nonrandomized controlled studies, reviews, and case series.

RESULTS

A series of potential clinical elements for the diagnostic fetal evaluation and for the 3 protocol areas of surgical care for the procedures (pre-, intra-, and postoperative care) are identified using an ERAS-like process.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified clinical elements have the potential for ERAS-LUTO fetal therapy guideline. Multidisciplinary collaboration (surgeon, anesthesia, nursing, imaging, and laboratory) is required for ERAS quality improvement in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative processes. Process elements in each of the operative areas can be audited, evaluated, compared, and modified/improved.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after second trimester amniocentesis between procedures performed by experts and non-experts

OBJECTIVES

To compare the rate of fetal loss in pregnancy after second trimester amniocentesis between procedures performed by experts and non-experts and to assess other pregnancy complications as secondary outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on singleton pregnancies that underwent mid-trimester amniocenteses in a single institution. The fetal loss rates of procedures performed by experts and non-experts were collected and analyzed. Other adverse pregnancy outcomes were also examined.

RESULTS

In total, 14,450 amniocenteses were performed during the study period. These included 11,357 (78.6%) procedures in the group expert operators and 3,093 (21.4%) procedures in the group non-expert operators. In the non-expert group, the fetal loss rate was slightly increased but not significantly (p=0.24).In addition, the higher number of spontaneous abortions was associated with blood-stained amniotic fluid sample (p<0.001; RR=9.28). Multiple needle insertions also increased in the non-expert group significantly. However, no difference in pregnancy outcomes was found between in single and multiple needle insertions.

CONCLUSIONS

The amniocentesis procedures performed by the non-experts was not increase the fetal loss rate. However, the other adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight and fetal growth restriction were significantly increased in the non-expert group.

Outcome of antenatal invasive diagnostic tests in a fetal medicine unit with low case load in North Wales, United Kingdom

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to review rate of miscarriage following antenatal invasive diagnostic procedures from a unit where relatively low annual numbers of procedures are undertaken. Data were analysed for 201 chorionic villous samplings (CVSs) performed between January 2007 and June 2019 and 511 amniocenteses performed between January 2008 and June 2019, in singleton pregnancies. The miscarriage rates after CVS was 0% at 48 hours, 0.6% at 2 weeks and 2.5% up to 24 weeks of gestation. All four miscarriages following CVS had significant inherent high-risk features, therefore, it would be inappropriate to attribute these losses solely to the procedure itself. None of the women who had an amniocentesis had a miscarriage during the study period. We did not find a causal association between number of invasive procedures performed by an operator and miscarriage rate in our setting even with low annual numbers of invasive procedures.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) of UK recommends a minimum of at least 30 CVSs or amniocenteses procedures per year for a practitioner in order to maintain skills. A centre performing more fetal invasive procedures has lower miscarriage rates due to more experience of practitioners.What the results of this study add? This study is the first long-term audit data from a smaller fetal medicine unit with relatively low annual case load, suggesting that miscarriage risk may actually be lower than the current understanding. No additional risk of miscarriage or pregnancy loss following fetal invasive procedures even with relatively low annual numbers than that recommended by the RCOG.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The findings of this study are important in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing which will see the overall number of fetal invasive procedures decline with time. Competence in safely undertaking antenatal invasive procedure can possibly be maintained with lower annual procedure numbers. Units undertaking low number of antenatal invasive procedure must continuously audit their practice to ensure satisfactory standards and outcomes. More research is needed from smaller units to corroborate or refute the findings of this study.

Pregnancy Loss After Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling: Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Introduction: To estimate the procedure-related risks of pregnancy loss following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis (AC) compared to pregnancies without procedure.

METHODS

This cohort study enrolled all women who underwent CVS or AC at the Department of Perinatology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia (from January 2013 to June 2015). For each group we obtained a maternal age and gestational age (11-14 weeks for CVS and >15 weeks for AC) for a matched control group without invasive procedures from the national database. The data was obtained from hospital records and telephone surveys concerning pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy loss rates in intervention vs. control groups were compared by generating relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

During the study period, 828 women underwent CVS and 2,164 women underwent AC. Complete outcome data was available in 2,798 cases (93.5%, 770 CVS, 2,028 AC). Pregnancy loss occurred in 8/770 (1.04%, 95% CI 0.4-2.0%) after CVS vs. 15/1130 (1.33%, 95% CI 0.8-2.2%) in matched control (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.33-1.8, p=0.6). It occurred in 16/2028 (0.79%, 95% CI 0.5-1.3%) after AC vs. 14/395 (3.29%, 95% CI 2.1-5.8%) in matched control (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.11-0.45, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The pregnancy loss rates after CVS and AC were comparable to losses in pregnancies without these procedures. With the increasing use of non-invasive prenatal testing, information that the invasive procedures are safe when indicated is essential.

Guideline No. 410: Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Pregnancy Management for Fetal Neural Tube Defects

OBJECTIVE

This revised guideline is intended to provide an update on the genetic aspects, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal neural tube defects.

TARGET POPULATION

Women who are pregnant or may become pregnant. Neural tube defect screening should be offered to all pregnant women.

OPTIONS

For prevention: a folate-rich diet, and folic acid and vitamin B₁₂ supplementation, with dosage depending on risk level. For screening: second-trimester anatomical sonography; first-trimester sonographic screening; maternal serum alpha fetoprotein; prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. For genetic testing: diagnostic amniocentesis with chromosomal microarray and amniotic fluid alpha fetoprotein and acetylcholinesterase; fetal exome sequencing. For pregnancy management: prenatal surgical repair; postnatal surgical repair; pregnancy termination with autopsy. For subsequent pregnancies: prevention and screening options and counselling.

OUTCOMES

The research on and implementation of fetal surgery for prenatally diagnosed myelomeningocele has added a significant treatment option to the previous options (postnatal repair or pregnancy termination), but this new option carries an increased risk of maternal morbidity. Significant improvements in health and quality of life, both for the mother and the infant, have been shown to result from the prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of fetal neural tube defects.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

The benefits for patient autonomy and decision-making are provided in the guideline. Harms include an unexpected fetal diagnosis and the subsequent management decisions. Harm can also result if the patient declines routine sonographic scans or if counselling and access to care for neural tube defects are delayed. Cost analysis (personal, family, health care) is not within the scope of this clinical practice guideline.

EVIDENCE

A directed and focused literature review was conducted using the search terms spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis, and neural tube defect management in order to update and revise this guideline. A peer review process was used for content validation and clarity, with appropriate ethical considerations.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Maternity care professionals who provide any part of pre-conception, antenatal, delivery, and neonatal care. This guideline is also appropriate for patient education. RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Directive clinique no 410 : Anomalies du tube neural : Prévention, dépistage, diagnostic et prise en charge de la grossesse

OBJECTIF

La présente directive clinique révisée vise à fournir une mise à jour sur les aspects génétiques, la prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et la prise en charge des anomalies du tube neural.

POPULATION CIBLE

Les femmes enceintes ou qui pourraient le devenir. Il convient d'offrir le dépistage des anomalies du tube neural à toutes les femmes enceintes.

OPTIONS

Pour la prévention : un régime alimentaire riche en acide folique et des suppléments d'acide folique et de vitamine B₁₂ selon une posologie d'après le niveau de risque. Pour le dépistage : l'échographie obstétricale du deuxième trimestre, le dépistage échographique du premier trimestre, le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine sérique maternelle et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique prénatale. Pour les tests génétiques : l'amniocentèse diagnostique avec analyse chromosomique sur micropuce et le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine et de l'acétylcholinestérase dans le liquide amniotique et le séquençage de l'exome fœtal. Pour la prise en charge de la grossesse : la réparation chirurgicale prénatale, la réparation chirurgicale postnatale et l'interruption de grossesse avec autopsie. Pour les grossesses subséquentes : les options de prévention et de dépistage et les conseils. RéSULTATS: La recherche et la mise en œuvre du traitement chirurgical fœtal en cas de diagnostic prénatal de myéloméningocèle ont ajouté une option thérapeutique fœtale importante aux options précédentes (réparation postnatale ou interruption de grossesse), mais cette nouvelle option comporte un risque accru de morbidité maternelle. La prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et le traitement des anomalies du tube neural se révèlent entraîner des améliorations importantes à la mère et au nourrisson en matière de santé et de qualité de vie. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Le type et l'ampleur des bénéfices, risques et coûts attendus pour les patientes grâce à la mise en œuvre de la présente directive clinique par un établissement de soins de santé intègrent un canal maternel préconception et prénatal adéquat comprenant l'accès des patientes aux soins, les conseils, les analyses et examens, l'imagerie, le diagnostic et l'interprétation. Les bénéfices relatifs à l'autonomie de la patiente et au processus décisionnel sont énoncés dans la présente directive clinique. Les risques comprennent un diagnostic fœtal inattendu et les décisions de prise en charge subséquentes. Le fait que la patiente refuse les échographies habituelles et le retard du conseil ou d'accès aux soins en cas d'anomalie du tube neural comportent également des risques. L'analyse des coûts (personnels, familiaux, santé publique) ne fait pas partie de la portée de la présente directive clinique. DONNéES PROBANTES: Afin de mettre à jour et réviser la présente directive, une revue de la littérature ciblée et dirigée a été effectuée à l'aide des termes de recherche suivants : spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis et neural tube defect management. Un processus d'examen par les pairs a été utilisé pour la validation et la clarté du contenu, avec des considérations appropriées d'ordre éthique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Consulter l'annexe A en ligne (le tableau A1 pour les définitions et le tableau A2 pour les interprétations des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Professionnels des soins de maternité qui offrent des soins préconception, prénataux, obstétricaux ou néonataux. La présente directive clinique convient également aux fins d'éducation des patientes. RECOMMANDATIONS (CLASSEMENT GRADE ENTRE PARENTHèSES).

New approach for estimating risk of miscarriage after chorionic villus sampling

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of miscarriage associated with chorionic villus sampling (CVS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of women attending for routine ultrasound examination at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation at one of eight fetal-medicine units in Spain, Belgium and Bulgaria, between July 2007 and June 2018. Two populations were included: (1) all singleton pregnancies undergoing first-trimester assessment at Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca in Murcia, Spain, that did not have CVS (non-CVS group); and (2) all singleton pregnancies that underwent CVS following first-trimester assessment at one of the eight participating centers (CVS group). We excluded pregnancies diagnosed with genetic anomalies or major fetal defects before or after birth, those that resulted in termination and those that underwent amniocentesis later in pregnancy. We used propensity score (PS) matching analysis to estimate the association between CVS and miscarriage. We compared the risk of miscarriage of the CVS and non-CVS groups after PS matching (1:1 ratio). This procedure creates two comparable groups balancing the maternal and pregnancy characteristics that are associated with CVS, in a similar way to that in which randomization operates in a randomized clinical trial.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 22 250 pregnancies in the non-CVS group and 3613 in the CVS group. The incidence of miscarriage in the CVS group (2.1%; 77/3613) was significantly higher than that in the non-CVS group (0.9% (207/22 250); P < 0.0001). The PS algorithm matched 2122 CVS with 2122 non-CVS cases, of which 40 (1.9%) and 55 (2.6%) pregnancies in the CVS and non-CVS groups, respectively, resulted in a miscarriage (odds ratio (OR), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.48-1.10); P = 0.146). We found a significant interaction between the risk of miscarriage following CVS and the risk of aneuploidy, suggesting that the effect of CVS on the risk of miscarriage differs depending on background characteristics. Specifically, when the risk of aneuploidy is low, the risk of miscarriage after CVS increases (OR, 2.87 (95% CI, 1.13-7.30)) and when the aneuploidy risk is high, the risk of miscarriage after CVS is paradoxically reduced (OR, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.28-0.76)), presumably owing to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancies with major aneuploidies that would otherwise have resulted in spontaneous miscarriage. For example, in a patient in whom the risk of aneuploidy is 1 in 1000 (0.1%), the risk of miscarriage after CVS will increase to 0.3% (0.2 percentage points higher).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of miscarriage in women undergoing CVS is about 1% higher than that in women who do not have CVS, although this excess risk is not solely attributed to the invasive procedure but, to some extent, to the demographic and pregnancy characteristics of the patients. After accounting for these risk factors and confining the analysis to low-risk pregnancies, CVS seems to increase the risk of miscarriage by about three times above the patient's background risk. Although this is a substantial increase in relative terms, in pregnancies without risk factors for miscarriage, the risk of miscarriage after CVS remains low and similar to, or slightly higher than, that in the general population. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic process on prenatal diagnostic procedures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accessibility of pregnant women to prenatal screening and diagnostic tests during the COVID-19 pandemic process and analyze the effect of the pandemic process on acceptance-rejection rates of fetal diagnostic procedures for high risk pregnancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As part of this cross-sectional study, during the pandemic, between the dates of 11 March 2020-30 June 2020 at Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine Perinatology Clinic, fetal structural anomaly detected by ultrasonography or with increased risk in screening test in the first and second trimester of high risk pregnancies, who were therefore recommended a prenatal diagnosis test, were defined as the control group and retrospectively compared with high risk pregnancies of the same periods (11 March 2019-30 June 2019) in the previous year.

RESULTS

A total of 267 cases were evaluated within the scope of the study. The rate of pregnant women undergoing the first and second trimester screening tests was 83% in the control group and 56% for pregnant women in the study group. When the total number of prenatal diagnostic procedures and the year each of the procedures performed are compared, a statistically significant difference was found between the study and control groups (p: .041 and p < .001, respectively). When evaluating the rates of performed prenatal diagnostic procedures during the first patient visit in comparison to years, a statistically significant difference was observed in the A/S group and in the total number of cases (p = .023, p < .001, respectively). Similarly, the rate of performed prenatal diagnostic procedure during the first patient visit and the patient's city of residence was similarly statistically significant from year to year (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in number of prenatal diagnosis and screening tests during the COVID-19 pandemic draws attention. Prenatal care services are a serious issue that cannot be overcome by any deficiencies in both maternal and fetal care.

Comparison of spontaneous fetal loss rates between women with singleton and twin pregnancies after mid-trimester amniocentesis - A historical cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare fetal loss rates before 28 weeks of singleton and twin pregnancies after mid-trimester amniocentesis.

METHOD

This historic cohort study included 13 773 women with singletons and 426 women with twins undergoing mid-trimester amniocentesis from 1/2015 to 3/2017. Pregnancies resulting in termination or selective reduction before 28 weeks were excluded, as well as twin gestations undergoing single-puncture amniocentesis. Fetal loss rates were compared between singleton and twins taking into account maternal characteristics, amniocentesis procedure, and fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

RESULTS

The rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities were similar in singleton and twin gestations (1.13% vs 0.70%, P = .253). No difference was found in maternal or fetal characteristics, or amniocentesis procedure between the two groups. The fetal loss rate was significantly higher in twin compared with singleton pregnancies (1.91% vs 0.24%, P < .001, RR = 8.25 [95% CI: 4.51 to 15.09]). The fetal loss rate between monochorionic twins and dichorionic twins was similar (1.80% vs 1.78%, P = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Twin pregnancies have higher risk of fetal loss after mid-trimester amniocentesis, which cannot be explained by differences in rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities, maternal characteristic, or amniocentesis technique.

Acute Perinatal Infection and the Evidenced-Based Risk of Intrauterine Diagnostic Testing: A Structured Review

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of perinatal infection from maternal exposure is increasing. The prevalence of acute maternal infections identifies cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, toxoplasmosis, and varicella as the most common organisms and in the order of frequency. Maternal informed consent and understanding is required before intrauterine testing for fetal infectious and possible genetic risk assessment.

METHODS

This structured review of the reproductive published literature focuses on the risks of amniocentesis and cordocentesis diagnostic procedure-related fetal loss rates and fetal vertical transmission (VT) rates from published infected pregnant cohorts.

RESULTS

The total postprocedure fetal loss rate for diagnostic amniocentesis procedures, in limited infectious cohorts, is 1.5% and does not appear to be increased compared to "noninfected" amniocentesis cohorts using an estimated background spontaneous fetal loss rate (no procedure) of 0.65%. The "pooled" unintended fetal loss rate is from small infected population cohorts, but can be used for counseling purposes. Postcordocentesis fetal loss risk, in an infected cohort, is not possible to estimate due to limited data. The "biological spontaneous fetal loss rate" risk with a perinatal infection (positive or negative fetal anomalies) and no diagnostic procedure before 20 weeks of gestation is reviewed. The risk of VT in acute infection cohorts as a result of the intra-amniotic diagnostic procedure is not found to be increased.

CONCLUSION

The unintended "fetal loss" rate after amniocentesis for perinatal infected cohorts is similar to that of noninfected cohorts, but the estimate is based on limited infected cohorts. There was no procedure-based risk of fetal VT in the infected cohorts, but identification of postprocedure maternal bleeding into the amniotic cavity increases the potential risk. Maternal knowledge translation and an informed consent process with risk-benefit maternal/fetal risk counseling are required prior to any diagnostic amniocentesis procedure.

Chorionic villus sampling experience of a reference perinatal medicine center

AIM

To share the chorionic villus sampling (CVS) experience of a single surgeon in our institution.

METHODS

This retrospective study consists of CVS cases performed between 2000 and 2018. A total of 66 types of indications were classified under two main categories, the screening group (SG) and the inherited disease group (IDG). The SG and IDG were compared in terms of clinical characteristics of the patients, Beksaç obstetrics index (BOI), timing of CVS in terms of gestational week, and complications and termination of pregnancy (TOP) rate.

RESULTS

CVS was performed at 656 women, 69 and 587 of whom were included in the SG and IDG, respectively. CVS indications of the SG were determined as advanced maternal age, high risk in combined test, fetal anomaly suspicion in ultrasonography, and increased nuchal translucency in 23, 23, 14 and 9 cases, respectively. On the other hand, CVS indications of the IDG were hereditary disorders related to hematological, muscular, and metabolic systems for 233, 179, and 116 cases, respectively. Furthermore, 32 patients had a single-gene disorder and 14 had a neurodegenerative disease. According to the results of CVS, 359 fetuses were found to be normal (54.73%), while 205 (31.25%) and 92 (14.02%) fetuses were found to be disorder-positive or carriers, respectively. Two hundred pregnant women accepted TOP. Eight (1.2%) pregnancies ended with abortion after CVS. Statistically significant differences were observed in BOI and TOP rate between SG and IDG (p: 0.042 and 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Hereditary disorders were the most common CVS indications and the acceptance of TOP was significantly higher in this group.

The impact of preimplantation genetic testing on prenatal diagnostic procedures

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, cell-free DNA screening has significantly reduced the number of invasive prenatal diagnostic testing in pregnancy. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is a commonly performed screening test in in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of PGT-A on subsequent utilization of prenatal diagnostic testing in IVF pregnancies.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of singleton and twin IVF pregnancies at a single center from January 2014 to December 2017. The rate of invasive diagnostic genetic testing (chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and/or amniocentesis) was compared between patients with pregnancies achieved after transfer of a euploid embryo by PGT-A (n = 71) and those with pregnancies achieved after transfer of an untested embryo (n = 38). Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the number of prenatal diagnostic procedures (25.4% PGT-A euploid embryo versus 31.6% untested embryo, p = .51 and p = .32 for one-sided and two-sided analyses, respectively) between the two groups. Maternal age, nuchal translucency measurements and the rate of abnormal sonographic findings were similar between the two groups. Patients without PGT-A pregnancies had a higher BMI (mean 29.6, p = .01) and were ethnically different (p = .013) compared to those with PGT-A.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of PGT-A in IVF patients did not reduce the number of invasive diagnostic tests performed at our institution.

Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the procedure-related risk of miscarriage after amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) based on a systematic review of the literature and an updated meta-analysis.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library was carried out to identify studies reporting complications following CVS or amniocentesis. Eligible for inclusion were large controlled studies reporting data for pregnancy loss prior to 24 weeks' gestation. Study authors were contacted when required to identify additional necessary data. Data for cases that had an invasive procedure and controls were inputted into contingency tables and the risk of miscarriage was estimated for each study. Summary statistics based on a random-effects model were calculated after taking into account the weighting for each study included in the systematic review. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage was estimated as a weighted risk difference from the summary statistics for cases and controls. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the similarity in risk levels for chromosomal abnormality between the invasive-testing and control groups. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Egger's bias was estimated to assess reporting bias in published studies.

RESULTS

The electronic search yielded 2943 potential citations, from which 12 controlled studies for amniocentesis and seven for CVS were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. A total of 580 miscarriages occurred following 63 723 amniocentesis procedures, resulting in a weighted risk of pregnancy loss of 0.91% (95% CI, 0.73-1.09%). In the control group, there were 1726 miscarriages in 330 469 pregnancies with a loss rate of 0.58% (95% CI, 0.47-0.70%). The weighted procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis was 0.30% (95% CI, 0.11-0.49%; I²  = 70.1%). A total of 163 miscarriages occurred following 13 011 CVS procedures, resulting in a risk of pregnancy loss of 1.39% (95% CI, 0.76-2.02%). In the control group, there were 1946 miscarriages in 232 680 pregnancies with a loss rate of 1.23% (95% CI, 0.86-1.59%). The weighted procedure-related risk of miscarriage following CVS was 0.20% (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.52%; I²  = 52.7%). However, when studies including only women with similar risk profiles for chromosomal abnormality in the intervention and control groups were considered, the procedure-related risk for amniocentesis was 0.12% (95% CI, -0.05 to 0.30%; I²  = 44.1%) and for CVS it was -0.11% (95% CI, -0.29 to 0.08%; I²  = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure-related risks of miscarriage following amniocentesis and CVS are lower than currently quoted to women. The risk appears to be negligible when these interventions were compared to control groups of the same risk profile. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the procedure-related risks of miscarriage following chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis in a large unselected screened population, and to determine whether these risks are consistent with those reported in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study carried out on data obtained from a large fetal medicine unit in the UK between January 2009 and May 2018. We included all women with singleton pregnancy who booked for pregnancy care at our unit before 20 weeks' gestation, after excluding those with multiple pregnancy, major fetal defect, pregnancy termination and loss to follow-up. We estimated the risk of miscarriage in women who underwent a CVS or amniocentesis as well as in those who did not have an invasive procedure. The procedure-related risk of miscarriage was estimated as risk difference (95% CI) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to derive odds ratios (95% CI) and determine which maternal and pregnancy characteristics provided a significant contribution in the prediction of miscarriage and whether CVS or amniocentesis provided a significant independent contribution.

RESULTS

During the study period, 45 120 singleton pregnancies were booked for pregnancy care at our hospital, of which 1546 had an invasive procedure. We excluded 1429 (3.2%) pregnancies due to fetal defects, termination of pregnancy or missing outcomes. Of the 43 691 pregnancies included in the study population, 861 underwent CVS and 375 amniocentesis. In pregnancies that underwent CVS, the risk of miscarriage was 1.5% (13/861), compared with 1.2% (476/39 152) in pregnancies that had first-trimester combined screening and did not have an invasive procedure (P = 0.437). In pregnancies that underwent an amniocentesis, the risk of miscarriage was 0.8% (3/375), compared with 1.2% (491/42 463) in those that did not undergo an invasive procedure (P = 0.520). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that there was no significant contribution in the prediction of the risk of miscarriage from CVS (P = 0.399 and P = 0.592, respectively) or amniocentesis (P = 0.543 and P = 0.550, respectively). The risk of procedure-related loss attributed to CVS was 0.29% (95% CI, -0.53 to 1.12%) and that following amniocentesis was -0.36% (95% CI, -1.26 to 0.55%), which was not significantly different from the risk in women who did not have any procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure-related risks of miscarriage following CVS and amniocentesis in our study are considerably lower than those currently quoted and are consistent with the estimates of such risks reported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Under certain situations, women with twin pregnancies may be counseled to undergo invasive prenatal diagnostic testing. Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis are the two generally performed invasive prenatal diagnostic tests. Studies comparing procedure-related fetal loss between first-trimester chorionic villus sampling and second-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the procedure-related fetal loss and the obstetrical outcomes of these two procedures, chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

The data from dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies on which first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (n = 54) or second-trimester amniocentesis (n = 170) was performed between December 2006 and January 2017 in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure-related fetal loss was classified as loss of one or all fetuses within 4 weeks of procedure, and overall fetal loss was classified as loss of one or all fetuses during the gestation. The groups were compared with respect to the procedure-related and obstetrical outcomes.

RESULTS

The difference in proportion of procedure-related fetal loss rate (1.9% for chorionic villus sampling vs. 1.8% for amniocentesis; P = 1.000) and the overall fetal loss rate (7.4% for chorionic villus sampling vs. 4.7% for amniocentesis; P = 0.489) between the two groups was not significant. The mean gestational ages at delivery were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Both the overall fetal loss rate and the procedure-related fetal loss rate of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in dichorionic twin pregnancies had no statistical significance. Both procedures can be safely used individually.

Gestational Outcomes of Pregnant Women Who Have Had Invasive Prenatal Testing for the Prenatal Diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Aim

To show the importance of prenatal diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) and to demonstrate the effect of DMD gene mutations on gestational outcomes.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 89 pregnancies in 81 individuals who were referred to Hacettepe University for prenatal diagnosis of DMD between January 2000 and December 2015. Prenatal diagnostic methods (chorionic villus sampling (CVS): 66, amniocentesis (AC): 23) were compared for test results, demographic features, and obstetric outcomes of pregnancies. The female fetuses were divided into two groups according to the DMD status (healthy or carrier) to understand the effect of DMD gene mutations on obstetric outcomes.

Results

Eight prenatally diagnosed disease-positive fetuses were terminated. There was no statistically significant difference between the CVS and AC groups in terms of study variables. There were 46 male fetuses (51.6%) and 43 female fetuses (48.4%). Fifteen of the female fetuses were carriers (34.8%). Median birthweight values were statistically insignificantly lower in the carrier group.

Conclusion

Pregnancies at risk for DMD should be prenatally tested to prevent the effect of disease on families and DMD carrier fetuses had obstetric outcomes similar to DMD negative female fetuses.

Development of a High-Fidelity Simulator for Teaching Chorionic Villus Sampling

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a synthetic high-fidelity simulator for teaching chorionic villus sampling.

METHODS

Working with a medical sculptor, the authors developed a simulator, constructed from various synthetic rubber materials, of a gravid female pelvis, including the vulva, vagina, cervix, and a 13-week-sized uterus with a gestational sac.

RESULTS

This simulator is high fidelity and durable, and it does not require any organic materials. Maternal-fetal medicine trainees valued this educational tool.

CONCLUSION

This novel, high-fidelity simulator is an additional tool for educators involved in teaching chorionic villus sampling.

Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Comparison of Two Mappers and Influence in the Diagnostic Yield

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine if the use of different mappers for NIPT may vary the results considerably.

Methods

Peripheral blood was collected from 217 pregnant women, 58 pathological (34 pregnancies with trisomy 21, 18 with trisomy 18, and 6 with trisomy 13) and 159 euploid. MPS was performed following a manufacturer's modified protocol of semiconductor sequencing. Obtained reads were mapped with two different software programs: TMAP and HPG-Aligner, comparing the results.

Results

Using TMAP, 57 pathological samples were correctly detected (sensitivity 98.28%, specificity 93.08%): 33 samples as trisomy 21 (sensitivity 97.06%, specificity 99.45%), 16 as trisomy 18 (sensibility 88.89%, specificity 93.97%), and 6 as trisomy 13 (sensibility 100%, specificity 100%). 11 false positives, 1 false negative, and 2 samples incorrectly identified were obtained. Using HPG-Aligner, all the 58 pathological samples were correctly identified (sensibility 100%, specificity 96.86%): 34 as trisomy 21 (sensibility 100%, specificity 98.91%), 18 as trisomy 18 (sensibility 100%, specificity 98.99%), and 6 as trisomy 13 (sensibility 100%, specificity 99.53%). 5 false positives were obtained.

Conclusion

Different mappers use slightly different algorithms, so the use of one mapper or another with the same batch file can provide different results.

When Consent Does Not Help: Challenges to Women's Access to a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section and the Limitations of the Informed Consent Doctrine

Pregnant women with a prior cesarean delivery face challenges in accessing a vaginal birth due to both hospital and provider preferences and practices. Although the doctrine of informed consent secures women's reproductive rights, it is not a viable legal remedy. Instead, women should champion increased maternity-related education and transparency as well as medical malpractice reform to increase the desired access.

The effect of diagnostic amniocentesis and its complications on early spontaneous abortion

Introduction

The occurrence of early abortion after amniocentesis is a serious problem in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology, and it is always important to discover the factors influencing this phenomenon. The incidence rate has been reported in different studies, even up to about 10%. So far, no studies have been conducted in Iran on the effect of amniocentesis and related complications on early abortion. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of amniocentesis and relevant complications on the incidence of early abortion in pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis.

Methods

This cohort study was conducted between March 2014 and March 2016 on pregnant candidates for amniocentesis referred to the perinatology clinic at Ommol-Banin Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Amniocentesis was performed for all patients with about 20–30cc in the same manner by a perinatologist. Maternal blood group, causes of amniocentesis, amniotic fluid profile (liquid color), status of inserting the needle through the placenta during amniocentesis, amniotic fluid leakage, and bleeding after amniocentesis were considered as exposure factors, and spontaneous abortion after amniocentesis until the end of the 20th week of pregnancy was taken as a consequence. Data were analyzed using IBM-SPSS version 20 via t-test and chi-square. Relative risk (RR) was calculated to determine the causal relationship of exposure with the consequences of spontaneous abortion during the first week after amniocentesis.

Results

This study was performed on 1000 pregnant women with mean age of 33.4±6.0 years (minimum 16, maximum 48 years). The incidence rate of spontaneous abortion after amniocentesis was obtained 1%. There was no association among causes of amniocentesis, maternal blood group, maternal underlying diseases, history of diseases associated with pregnancy, and spontaneous abortion. Based on the chi-square test, a significant statistical relationship was found between amniotic fluid leakage and spontaneous abortion (RR=15.37, p=0.001). There was also a significant statistical relationship between bleeding after amniocentesis and spontaneous abortion; so that in patients with more bleeding, spontaneous abortion was more prevalent (RR=6.83, P=0.001).

Conclusion

According to the results, it seems that amniotic fluid leakage and bleeding after amniocentesis should be considered as two serious complications of amniocentesis, which can cause the incidence of spontaneous abortion in pregnant patients undergoing amniocentesis.