1
|
Deslandes A, Leonardi M. Reply. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2025; 65:245-246. [PMID: 39601334 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- A Deslandes
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Specialist Imaging Partners, Adelaide, Australia
| | - M Leonardi
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feldman MK, Wasnik AP, Adamson M, Dawkins AA, Dibble EH, Jones LP, Joshi G, Melamud K, Patel-Lippmann KK, Shampain K, VanBuren W, Kang SK. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Endometriosis. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:S384-S395. [PMID: 39488350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/31/2024] [Indexed: 11/04/2024]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a common condition impacting individuals assigned female at birth. Though incompletely understood, the disorder is caused by endometrial-like tissue located outside of the endometrial cavity, associated with inflammation and fibrosis. Clinical presentation is variable, ranging from asymptomatic to severe pelvic pain and infertility. Treatment is determined by the patient's individualized goals and can include medical therapies to temporize symptoms or definitive surgical excision. Imaging is used to help diagnose endometriosis and for treatment planning. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Megan Adamson
- Clinica Family Health, Lafayette, Colorado; American Academy of Family Physicians
| | | | - Elizabeth H Dibble
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Lisa P Jones
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gayatri Joshi
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | - Kira Melamud
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Stella K Kang
- Specialty Chair, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Young SW, Jha P, Chamié L, Rodgers S, Kho RM, Horrow MM, Glanc P, Feldman M, Groszmann Y, Khan Z, Young SL, Poder L, Burnett TL, Hu EM, Egan S, VanBuren W. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis. Radiology 2024; 311:e232191. [PMID: 38591980 PMCID: PMC11070694 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a prevalent and potentially debilitating condition that mostly affects individuals of reproductive age, and often has a substantial diagnostic delay. US is usually the first-line imaging modality used when patients report chronic pelvic pain or have issues of infertility, both common symptoms of endometriosis. Other than the visualization of an endometrioma, sonologists frequently do not appreciate endometriosis on routine transvaginal US images. Given a substantial body of literature describing techniques to depict endometriosis at US, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to make recommendations aimed at improving the screening process for endometriosis. The panel was composed of experts in the imaging and management of endometriosis, including radiologists, sonographers, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons. A comprehensive literature review combined with a modified Delphi technique achieved a consensus. This statement defines the targeted screening population, describes techniques for augmenting pelvic US, establishes direct and indirect observations for endometriosis at US, creates an observational grading and reporting system, and makes recommendations for additional imaging and patient management. The panel recommends transvaginal US of the posterior compartment, observation of the relative positioning of the uterus and ovaries, and the uterine sliding sign maneuver to improve the detection of endometriosis. These additional techniques can be performed in 5 minutes or less and could ultimately decrease the delay of an endometriosis diagnosis in at-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luciana Chamié
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Shuchi Rodgers
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Rosanne M. Kho
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Mindy M. Horrow
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Myra Feldman
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Yvette Groszmann
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Zaraq Khan
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Steven L. Young
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Liina Poder
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Tatnai L. Burnett
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Eric M. Hu
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Susan Egan
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| | - Wendaline VanBuren
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo
Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 (S.W.Y.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University
School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (P.J.); Department of Radiology,
Chamié Imagem da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil (L.C.); Department of
Radiology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa (S.R., M.M.H.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner Health System, Phoenix, Ariz
(R.M.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(P.G.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.F.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass (Y.G.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Z.K., T.L.B.) and
Department of Radiology (W.V.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
(S.L.Y.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (L.P.); Department of Radiology,
Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah (E.M.H.); and Department of
Radiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
(S.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Avery JC, Deslandes A, Freger SM, Leonardi M, Lo G, Carneiro G, Condous G, Hull ML. Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis part 1: a systematic review of recent developments in ultrasound, combination imaging, and artificial intelligence. Fertil Steril 2024; 121:164-188. [PMID: 38101562 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Endometriosis affects 1 in 9 women and those assigned female at birth. However, it takes 6.4 years to diagnose using the conventional standard of laparoscopy. Noninvasive imaging enables a timelier diagnosis, reducing diagnostic delay as well as the risk and expense of surgery. This review updates the exponentially increasing literature exploring the diagnostic value of endometriosis specialist transvaginal ultrasound (eTVUS), combinations of eTVUS and specialist magnetic resonance imaging, and artificial intelligence. Concentrating on literature that emerged after the publication of the IDEA consensus in 2016, we identified 6192 publications and reviewed 49 studies focused on diagnosing endometriosis using emerging imaging techniques. The diagnostic performance of eTVUS continues to improve but there are still limitations. eTVUS reliably detects ovarian endometriomas, shows high specificity for deep endometriosis and should be considered diagnostic. However, a negative scan cannot preclude endometriosis as eTVUS shows moderate sensitivity scores for deep endometriosis, with the sonographic evaluation of superficial endometriosis still in its infancy. The fast-growing area of artificial intelligence in endometriosis detection is still evolving, but shows great promise, particularly in the area of combined multimodal techniques. We finalize our commentary by exploring the implications of practice change for surgeons, sonographers, radiologists, and fertility specialists. Direct benefits for endometriosis patients include reduced diagnostic delay, better access to targeted therapeutics, higher quality operative procedures, and improved fertility treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie C Avery
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Alison Deslandes
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Shay M Freger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mathew Leonardi
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Glen Lo
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Gustavo Carneiro
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing (CVSSP), School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - G Condous
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Gynaecology Department, Omni Ultrasound and Gynaecological Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mary Louise Hull
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Gynaecology Department, Embrace Fertility, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hansen T, Hanchard T, Alphonse J. The accuracy of ultrasound compared to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A narrative review. SONOGRAPHY 2023. [DOI: 10.1002/sono.12350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Hansen
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences Central Queensland University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Tracey Hanchard
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences Central Queensland University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Jennifer Alphonse
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences Central Queensland University Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Ultrasound for Women Bella Vista New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Early noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis: dysmenorrhea and specific ultrasound findings are important indicators in young women. Fertil Steril 2023; 119:455-464. [PMID: 36493871 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To diagnose endometriosis in young patients ≤25y with severe dysmenorrhea through specific ultrasonographic examination findings and to correlate the symptoms to its different forms: ovarian, deep infiltrating endometriosis, and adenomyosis. DESIGN A retrospective observational study. SETTING University Hospital. PATIENT(S) Women aged 12-25 years with severe dysmenorrhea and a visual analog scale score ≥7. INTERVENTION(S) This study included 371 women aged 12-25 years referred to our gynecological ultrasound (US) Unit between January 2016 and December 2021 with severe dysmenorrhea and a visual analog scale score ≥7. Two dimensional, 3 dimensional, and power Doppler US pelvic examinations (transvaginal or transrectal in presexually active girls) were performed on all patients. Medical history and symptoms were collected routinely for each patient before the scan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) All possible locations of endometriosis, isolated or combined occurrence, were evaluated, and recorded using an US dedicated mapping sheet. Painful symptoms were evaluated by visual analog scale and correlated to the different endometriosis forms. RESULT(S) At least one US endometriosis feature was identified in 131 (35.3%) patients, whereas the US findings of 170 (45.8%) were normal despite the referred dysmenorrhea. Of the 131 patients with endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma was found in 54 (41.2%), and 22 (16.8%) had an isolated endometrioma. Adenomyosis was detected in 67 (51.1%) patients, and 28 (21.4%) showed its isolated indications. Posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis was found in 70 (53.4%) patients, and uterosacral ligament (USL) fibrotic thickening was found in 63 (48.1%). In 23 patients, the USL lesion was completely isolated. The combined occurrence of dysmenorrhea with dyspareunia, bowel symptoms, and heavy menstrual bleeding increases the presence of endometriosis up to 59%, 63%, and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S) In young patients with severe dysmenorrhea, the US-based detection rate of pelvic endometriosis was one-third. USL fibrotic thickening and mild adenomyosis are often the only findings, so an accurate pelvic US scan can provide an early diagnosis by identifying small endometriotic lesions. Young patients with dysmenorrhea should be referred to an expert sonographer to minimize the delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Keckstein J, Hoopmann M, Merz E, Grab D, Weichert J, Helmy-Bader S, Wölfler M, Bajka M, Mechsner S, Schäfer S, Krentel H, Hudelist G. Expert opinion on the use of transvaginal sonography for presurgical staging and classification of endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307:5-19. [PMID: 36367580 PMCID: PMC9837004 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06766-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Gynecological ultrasonography plays a central role in the management of endometriosis. The rapid technical development as well as the currently increasing evidence for non-invasive diagnostic methods require an updated compilation of recommendations for the use of ultrasound in the management of endometriosis. The present work aims to highlight the accuracy of sonography for diagnosing and classifying endometriosis and will formulate the present list of key messages and recommendations. This paper aims to demonstrate the accuracy of TVS in the diagnosis and classification of endometriosis and to discuss the clinical applications and consequences of TVS findings for indication, surgical planning and assessment of associated risk factors. (1) Sophisticated ultrasound is the primary imaging modality recommended for suspected endometriosis. The examination procedure should be performed according to the IDEA Consensus. (2) Surgical intervention to confirm the diagnosis alone is not recommended. A preoperative imaging procedure with TVS and/or MRI is strongly recommended. (3) Ultrasound examination does not allow the definitive exclusion of endometriosis. (4) The examination is primarily transvaginal and should always be combined with a speculum and a bimanual examination. (5) Additional transabdominal ultrasonography may enhance the accuracy of the examination in case of extra pelvic disease, extensive findings or limited transvaginal access. (6) Sonographic assessment of both kidneys is mandatory when deep endometriosis (DE) and endometrioma are suspected. (7) Endometriomas are well defined by sonographic criteria. When evaluating the ovaries, the use of IOTA criteria is recommended. (8) The description of sonographic findings of deep endometriosis should be systematically recorded and performed using IDEA terminology. (9) Adenomyosis uteri has sonographically well-defined criteria (MUSA) that allow for detection with high sensitivity and specificity. MRI is not superior to differentiated skilled ultrasonography. (10) Classification of the extent of findings should be done according to the #Enzian classification. The current data situation proves the best possible prediction of the intraoperative situs of endometriosis (exclusive peritoneum) for the non-invasive application of the #Enzian classification. (11) Transvaginal sonographic examination by an experienced examiner is not inferior to MRI diagnostics regarding sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of the extent of deep endometriosis. (12) The major advantage of non-invasive imaging and classification of endometriosis is the differentiated planning or possible avoidance of surgical interventions. The recommendations represent the opinion of experts in the field of non-invasive and invasive diagnostics as well as therapy of endometriosis. They were developed with the participation of the following national and international societies: DEGUM, ÖGUM, SGUM, SEF, AGEM/DGGG, and EEL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Keckstein
- Endometriosis Clinic Dres, Jörg und Sigrid Keckstein, Richard Wagner Strasse18, Villach, Austria.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
- SEF, Scientific Endometriosis Foundation (Stiftung Endometrioseforschung), Westerstede, Germany.
- AGEM, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endometriose of the DGGG, Berlin, Germany.
- EEL, European Endometriosis League, Unterhaching, Germany.
| | - M Hoopmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - E Merz
- Centre for Ultrasound and Prenatal Medicine, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Grab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - J Weichert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - S Helmy-Bader
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- ÖGUM, Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Wölfler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Endometriosis, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- SEF, Scientific Endometriosis Foundation (Stiftung Endometrioseforschung), Westerstede, Germany
- ÖGUM, Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Bajka
- OB/GYN Volketswil, Volketswil, Switzerland
- SGUM, Schweizer Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - S Mechsner
- Department of Gynaecology, Endometriosis Centre Charité, Charite Berlin University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
- SEF, Scientific Endometriosis Foundation (Stiftung Endometrioseforschung), Westerstede, Germany
- AGEM, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endometriose of the DGGG, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Schäfer
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany
- SEF, Scientific Endometriosis Foundation (Stiftung Endometrioseforschung), Westerstede, Germany
- AGEM, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endometriose of the DGGG, Berlin, Germany
- EEL, European Endometriosis League, Unterhaching, Germany
| | - H Krentel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bethesda Hospital Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
- SEF, Scientific Endometriosis Foundation (Stiftung Endometrioseforschung), Westerstede, Germany
- AGEM, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endometriose of the DGGG, Berlin, Germany
- EEL, European Endometriosis League, Unterhaching, Germany
| | - G Hudelist
- Department of Gynaecology, Centre for Endometriosis, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria
- Rudolfinerhaus Private Clinic and Campus, Vienna, Austria
- SEF, Scientific Endometriosis Foundation (Stiftung Endometrioseforschung), Westerstede, Germany
- ÖGUM, Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin, Vienna, Austria
- EEL, European Endometriosis League, Unterhaching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barra F, Zorzi C, Albanese M, Stepniewska A, Deromemaj X, De Mitri P, Roviglione G, Clarizia R, Gustavino C, Ferrero S, Ceccaroni M. Ultrasonographic Findings Indirectly Predicting Parametrial Involvement in Patients with Deep Endometriosis: The ULTRA-PARAMETRENDO I Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30:61-72. [PMID: 36591808 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate ultrasonographic findings as a first-line imaging tool to indirectly predict the presence of parametrial endometriosis (PE) in women with suspected deep endometriosis (DE) undergoing surgery. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (ULTRA-PARAMETRENDO I study; NCT05239871). SETTING Referral center for DE. PATIENTS Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for DE. INTERVENTIONS Preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography was done according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis consensus statement. A stepwise forward regression analysis was performed considering the simultaneous presence of DE nodules and the following ultrasonographic indirect signs of DE: diffuse adenomyosis, endometriomas, ovary fixed to the lateral pelvic wall or the uterine wall, absence of anterior/posterior sliding sign, and hydronephrosis. The gold standard for the presence of PE was surgery with histologic confirmation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 1079 patients, 212 had a surgical diagnosis of PE (left: 18.5%; right: 17.0%; bilateral: 15.9%). The obtained prediction model (χ2 = 222.530; p <.001) for PE included, as independent indirect DE signs presence of hydronephrosis (odds ratio [OR] = 14.5; p = .002), complete absence of posterior sliding sign (OR = 3.3; p <.001), presence of multiple endometriomas per ovary (OR = 3.0; p = .001), and ovary fixation to the uterine wall (OR = 2.4; p <.001); as independent concomitant DE nodules, presence of uterosacral nodules with the largest diameter >10 mm (OR = 3.2; p <.001), presence of rectal endometriosis with the largest diameter >25 mm (OR = 2.3; p = .004), and rectovaginal septum infiltration (OR = 2.3; p = .003). The optimal diagnostic balance was obtained considering at least 2 concomitant DE nodules and at least 1 indirect DE sign (area under the curve 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.79). CONCLUSION Specific indirect ultrasonographic findings should raise suspicion of PE in women undergoing preoperative assessment for DE. The suspicion of parametrial invasion may be critical to address patients to expert leading centers, where proper diagnosis and surgical treatment for PE can be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Barra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni); Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Barra and Gustavino), Genoa, Italy
| | - Carlotta Zorzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Mara Albanese
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Anna Stepniewska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Xheni Deromemaj
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Paola De Mitri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Giovanni Roviglione
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Roberto Clarizia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| | - Claudio Gustavino
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Barra and Gustavino), Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Ferrero), Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, and Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa (Dr. Ferrero), Genoa, Italy.
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Minimally-Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy (ISSA), IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar, Verona (Drs. Barra, Zorzi, Albanese, Stepniewska, Deromemaj, De Mitri, Roviglione, Clarizia, and Ceccaroni)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pascoal E, Wessels JM, Aas-Eng MK, Abrao MS, Condous G, Jurkovic D, Espada M, Exacoustos C, Ferrero S, Guerriero S, Hudelist G, Malzoni M, Reid S, Tang S, Tomassetti C, Singh SS, Van den Bosch T, Leonardi M. Strengths and limitations of diagnostic tools for endometriosis and relevance in diagnostic test accuracy research. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2022; 60:309-327. [PMID: 35229963 DOI: 10.1002/uog.24892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease that can cause pain, infertility and reduced quality of life. Diagnosing endometriosis remains challenging, which yields diagnostic delays for patients. Research on diagnostic test accuracy in endometriosis can be difficult due to verification bias, as not all patients with endometriosis undergo definitive diagnostic testing. The purpose of this State-of-the-Art Review is to provide a comprehensive update on the strengths and limitations of the diagnostic modalities used in endometriosis and discuss the relevance of diagnostic test accuracy research pertaining to each. We performed a comprehensive literature review of the following methods: clinical assessment including history and physical examination, biomarkers, diagnostic imaging, surgical diagnosis and histopathology. Our review suggests that, although non-invasive diagnostic methods, such as clinical assessment, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, do not yet qualify formally as replacement tests for surgery in diagnosing all subtypes of endometriosis, they are likely to be appropriate for advanced stages of endometriosis. We also demonstrate in our review that all methods have strengths and limitations, leading to our conclusion that there should not be a single gold-standard diagnostic method for endometriosis, but rather, multiple accepted diagnostic methods appropriate for different circumstances. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Pascoal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - J M Wessels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- AIMA Laboratories Inc., Hamilton, Canada
| | - M K Aas-Eng
- Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M S Abrao
- Gynecologic Division, BP-A Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Condous
- Acute Gynecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Sydney Medical School, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Jurkovic
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Espada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Blue Mountains ANZAC Memorial Hospital, Katoomba, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Exacoustos
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - S Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Guerriero
- Centro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita (PMA) e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Policlinico Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy
| | - G Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Center for Endometriosis, St John of God Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Scientific Endometriosis Foundation (SEF), Westerstede, Germany
| | - M Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | - S Reid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Tang
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - C Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Centre, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S S Singh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - T Van den Bosch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Leonardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hudelist G, Valentin L, Saridogan E, Condous G, Malzoni M, Roman H, Jurkovic D, Keckstein J. What to choose and why to use - a critical review on the clinical relevance of rASRM, EFI and Enzian classifications of endometriosis. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2021; 13:331-338. [PMID: 35026095 PMCID: PMC9148714 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.13.4.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a common benign gynaecological disease that affects pelvic structures and causes adhesions. Endometriosis outside the pelvis exists but is rarer. Deep endometriosis may affect organs such as the urinary bladder, ureters, bowel and sacral roots. Adenomyosis (growth of endometrium in the myometrium, sometimes explained by disruption of the uterine junctional zone) frequently co-exists with deep endometriosis. Over the past decades, multiple attempts have been made to describe the anatomical extent of endometriosis. Out of approximately 20 classification systems suggested and published so far, three have gained widespread acceptance. These are the rASRM (American Society of Reproductive Medicine) classification, the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) and the Enzian classification. Ideally, a classification system should be useful both for describing disease extent based on surgical findings and results of imaging methods (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging). OBJECTIVES To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the three classification systems. METHODS This is a narrative review based on selected publications and experience of the authors. We discuss the current literature on the use of the rASRM, EFI and Enzian classification systems for describing disease extent with imaging methods and for prediction of fertility, surgical complexity, and risk of surgical complications. We underline the need for one universally acceptable terminology to describe the extent of endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS A useful classification system for endometriosis should describe the sites and extent of the disease, be related to surgical complexity and to disease-associated symptoms, including subfertility and should satisfy needs of both, imaging specialists for pre-operative classification and surgeons. The need for such a system is obvious and is provided by the #Enzian classification. Future research is necessary to test its validity.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Early diagnosis and long-term management of endometriosis is important in adolescent girls considering their potential for future pregnancy and need for preventing disease progression. However, symptoms and clinical findings of adolescent endometriosis may differ from those of typical adult endometriosis, making diagnosis difficult. In adolescents, menstrual pain may present as acyclic and unresponsive to commonly used medication. Typical imaging findings in adult endometriosis, such as ovarian endometriotic cysts and fibrotic scars, are less common in adolescents. Peritoneal lesions, characteristic of early-stage endometriosis, are commonly found in this age group. It should be noted that endometriosis may also be found in adolescents before menarche, because of premenarcheal endometriosis or congenital uterine anomaly and outflow obstruction; the latter requiring surgical correction. Although surgery is reported to be effective for pain, postsurgical recurrence rate is high, and the effect of hormonal treatment is controversial. The optimal timing for surgical intervention also remains to be determined. Here, we aim to identify the unique characteristics of endometriosis in adolescents to achieve early diagnosis and optimal management for this group of patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin XL, Zhang DS, Ju ZY, Li XM, Zhang YZ. Diagnostic value of different color ultrasound diagnostic method in endometrial lesions. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:5037-5045. [PMID: 34307554 PMCID: PMC8283585 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i19.5037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial lesions include endometrial cancer and inferior fibroids. Among them, endometrial cancer as a malignant tumor seriously endangers the life and health of patients. Ultrasonography is an important means of diagnosing female reproductive system diseases, and it is of critical value for the early diagnosis of endometrial cancer. However, different ultrasound inspection programs have achieved different results. It is of great significance to choose a suitable inspection program.
AIM To explore the diagnostic efficacy of different ultrasonic examination methods in clinical endometrial lesions.
METHODS The 140 patients with endometrial lesions who were treated in our hospital from April 2018 to October 2019 were used as the research subjects. All patients underwent transvaginal color ultrasound and transabdominal color ultrasound. We compared the diagnostic coincidence and image display effects of the two different examination methods, and the endometrial thickness, blood flow, uterine effusion and resistance index of different diseases were observed by transvaginal color ultrasound.
RESULTS The diagnostic coincidence rate of all types of diseases of transvaginal color ultrasound was significantly higher than that of transabdominal color ultrasound (P = 0.001, 0.005, 0.001 and 0.001). In addition, the excellent and good rate of image display of transvaginal color ultrasound was higher than that of transabdominal color ultrasound (P = 0.001). There were significant differences in endometrial thickness in patients with different types of endometrial lesions through the transvaginal color examination (P = 0.001). The incidence rate of uterine effusion in patients with endometrial carcinoma was significantly higher than that in patients with other types of endometrial lesions (P = 0.001), and the rate of the blood flow was the highest (P = 0.001). The comparison of blood flow resistance index indicated that the blood flow resistance index in endometrial cancer patients was the lowest, which shows that the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION The overall diagnostic efficacy of transvaginal color ultrasound in the clinical diagnosis of endometrial lesions is better than that of transabdominal color ultrasound, which held higher diagnostic coincidence rate and image display effect. There were significant differences in the thickness of the endometrium and the blood flow in different types of lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Lin Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, Pingyi County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Linyi 273300, Shandong Province, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Pingyi County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Linyi 273300, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zhi-Ye Ju
- Department of Ultrasound, Rizhao Peoples Hospital, Rizhao 276800, Shandong Province, China
| | - Xiu-Ming Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pingyi County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Linyi 273300, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yao-Zhu Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Rizhao Peoples Hospital, Rizhao 276800, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martire FG, Zupi E, Lazzeri L, Morosetti G, Conway F, Centini G, Solima E, Pietropolli A, Piccione E, Exacoustos C. Transvaginal Ultrasound Findings After Laparoscopic Rectosigmoid Segmental Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2021; 40:1219-1228. [PMID: 32936475 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) findings in patients who underwent segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and to correlate postsurgical ultrasound findings with symptoms. METHODS A retrospective study including 50 premenopausal women with bowel endometriosis who underwent segmental rectosigmoid resection was conducted. Within 12 months after surgery, a TVUS examination was conducted in all patients to evaluate the presence of postsurgical endometriosis locations and symptoms, including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dysuria, dyschezia, and chronic pelvic pain. Pelvic pain was assessed in all women by a visual analog scale. RESULTS At the follow-up 32 of 50 patients were receiving medical treatment, whereas 18 women declined postsurgical medical therapy and tried to conceive. A high percentage of adhesions (90%) was found. A negative sliding sign (a simple diagnostic sign that can be performed during a TVUS examination, consisting of gentle pressure applied by both the vaginal transducer and the examiner's hand on the abdomen; if the uterus does not glide freely along with the rectum and posterior fornix, the sign is considered negative, and adhesions can be suspected) was found in 29 (58%) women and was associated with bowel symptoms. Recurrence of posterior DIE was found in 9 cases (18%) and endometriomas in 8 cases (16%). Adenomyosis was observed in 80% of women and was present in all symptomatic patients. CONCLUSIONS After rectosigmoid segmental resection patients with DIE may continue to be symptomatic, and postoperative TVUS may reveal foci of disease or pelvic adhesions. Moreover, adenomyosis could be linked to symptoms experienced during follow up. Women should be aware that painful symptoms and alterations of pelvic organs could still be present after surgery and be detectable by TVUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco G Martire
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Errico Zupi
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Lucia Lazzeri
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giulia Morosetti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Conway
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Centini
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Eugenio Solima
- Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Fatebenefratelli, Hospital Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Adalgisa Pietropolli
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Piccione
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Exacoustos
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aas-Eng MK, Montanari E, Lieng M, Keckstein J, Hudelist G. Transvaginal Sonographic Imaging and Associated Techniques for Diagnosis of Ovarian, Deep Endometriosis, and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review. Semin Reprod Med 2020; 38:216-226. [PMID: 33232986 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of endometriosis and in particular deep endometriosis (DE) is crucial in the clinical management of women facing this debilitating condition. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is the first-line imaging method and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide supplemental information. However, the delay in diagnosis of up to 10 years and more is of concern. This problem might be overcome by simple steps using imaging with emphasis on TVS and referral to tertiary care. Finally, TVS is crucial in mapping extent and location of disease in planning surgical therapy and counseling women regarding various therapeutic options. This review presents the available data on imaging of endometriosis with a focus on TVS and MRI for DE, adenomyosis, and ovarian endometriomas including endometriomas in pregnancy as well as the use of "soft markers." The review presents an approach that is in accordance with the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mee Kristine Aas-Eng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eliana Montanari
- Department of Gynecology, Certified Center for Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marit Lieng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joerg Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung/Endometriosis Research Group Central Europe
| | - Gernot Hudelist
- Department of Gynecology, Certified Center for Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain, Hospital St. John of God, Vienna, Austria.,Stiftung Endometrioseforschung/Endometriosis Research Group Central Europe
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martire FG, Lazzeri L, Conway F, Siciliano T, Pietropolli A, Piccione E, Solima E, Centini G, Zupi E, Exacoustos C. Adolescence and endometriosis: symptoms, ultrasound signs and early diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2020; 114:1049-1057. [PMID: 33036795 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ultrasonographic presence of different forms of endometriosis and the associated clinical symptoms in adolescent women. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING University hospital. PATIENT(S) Two hundred and seventy women aged 12-20 years referred to the gynecologic ultrasound unit from January 2014 to June 2019. INTERVENTION(S) Two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and power Doppler ultrasound (US) pelvic examination (transvaginal or transrectal in pre-sexually active adolescents) were performed in all included adolescents. Medical history was collected for each patient before the scan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) All possible locations of endometriosis evaluated and recorded using a dedicated ultrasound mapping sheet and severity of painful symptoms evaluated through a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULT(S) Dysmenorrhea was detected in 147 (54.4%) of 270 patients and heavy menstrual bleeding in 76 (28.1%) of 270. At least one ultrasound feature of endometriosis was identified in 36 (13.3%) of 270 cases. Ovarian endometriomas were found in 22 (11%) patients, adenomyosis in 16 (5.2%), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in 10 (3.7%). Ultrasound signs of endometriosis were found in 21% of adolescents who reported dysmenorrhea and 33% with dyspareunia. The presence of DIE at ultrasound was associated with bowel symptoms in 33% of patients and associated with dyspareunia in 25% of patients. CONCLUSION(S) The detection rate of pelvic endometriotic lesions at ultrasound was 13%. The rates of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and heavy menstrual bleeding in adolescents with endometriosis ultrasound signs were statistically significantly higher compared with those without. In patients with dysmenorrhea, the detection rate of pelvic endometriosis at ultrasound increased to 20%. Professionals involved with teens should be aware of the clinical presentation of endometriosis to reduce the delay between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis, referring these young women to dedicated centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco G Martire
- Department of Surgical Science, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy.
| | - Lucia Lazzeri
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Francesca Conway
- Department of Surgical Science, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy
| | - Terry Siciliano
- Department of Surgical Science, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy
| | - Adalgisa Pietropolli
- Department of Surgical Science, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Piccione
- Department of Surgical Science, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Centini
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Errico Zupi
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Caterina Exacoustos
- Department of Surgical Science, Gynecological Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Leonardi M, Reid S, Lu C, Condous G. Prevalence of Deep Endometriosis and Rectouterine Pouch Obliteration in the Presence of Normal Ovaries. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 42:1211-1216. [PMID: 32682707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is well-established that there is a strong association between ovarian endometriomas (OE) and deep endometriosis (DE) and rectouterine pouch (RP) obliteration. We aimed to determine the prevalence of DE and RP obliteration in the presence of normal ovaries. METHODS We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study from January 2009 to December 2017 using a prospective multicentre data registry. Participants included patients with signs and/or symptoms of endometriosis who underwent excisional laparoscopic surgery at one of eight hospitals. The primary outcome was the prevalence of DE and RP obliteration, which was compared between women with normal ovaries (i.e., no OE) and women with ovaries containing OE. Secondary outcomes evaluated included rates of DE by anatomic site between women with and without OE. RESULTS The ovaries did not contain an OE in 319 of 410 patients (77.8%). The prevalence of DE and RP obliteration in this cohort was 25.4% and 9.7% (81 and 31 patients), respectively; whereas, in patients with OE, DE and RP obliteration prevalence was 68.1% and 60.4% (62 and 55 patients), respectively (P < 0.001 for both DE and RP obliteration). The uterosacral ligaments were the most common site for DE (right: 47/319 [14.7%]; left: 42/319 [13.2%]). CONCLUSIONS In patients who visited a tertiary care centre with endometriosis without ovarian involvement, 1 in 4 had DE and 1 in 10 had RP obliteration. These prevalence rates should encourage knowledge and skills dissemination to improve non-invasive imaging diagnosis overall. In patients with symptoms or signs suggestive of endometriosis, a basic pelvic ultrasound that ends at evaluation for OE should not be regarded as reassuring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Leonardi
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia; Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Shannon Reid
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia; Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Chuan Lu
- Department of Computer Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK
| | - George Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia; Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; OMNI Gynaecological Ultrasound and Care, St. Leonards, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leonardi M, Condous G. Re: Association between kissing and retropositioned ovaries and severity of endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:1645-1646. [PMID: 31541278 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Leonardi
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia. .,Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - George Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia.,Sydney Medical School Nepean, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Couples with mild male factor infertility and at least 3 failed previous IVF attempts may benefit from laparoscopic investigation regarding assisted reproduction outcome. Sci Rep 2020; 10:2350. [PMID: 32047198 PMCID: PMC7012822 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59170-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the value of laparoscopy for couples diagnosed with mild male factor infertility and at least three previous failed In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) attempts. A total of 169 couples were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients were presented with the option of being subjected to laparoscopic investigation for correction of previously unidentified endometriosis or pelvic adhesions. The outcome measures were Live Birth/Ongoing Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and positive hCG rate. One-hundred and one of them opted for, whereas 68 opted against laparoscopic investigation. All patients proceeded with a single ICSI cycle. Following laparoscopic investigation, 43 patients were diagnosed with endometriosis, 22 with adhesions, while for 36 patients laparoscopic investigation provided no further diagnosis. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding baseline hormonal levels and other characteristics between the two groups and the three subgroups. When compared to the no-laparoscopy group, women subjected to laparoscopy presented with a higher clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate. Following endometriosis correction, a marginally non-statistically significant trend was observed regarding a decrease in poor-quality blastocysts (p = 0.056). A statistically significant higher clinical pregnancy (p = 0.03) and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate was observed in the endometriosis group when compared to male factor infertility only (p = 0.04). Laparoscopic identification and correction of undiagnosed endometriosis in couples initially diagnosed with male infertility and at least 3 failed previous IVF attempts, appears to be a promising approach efficiently addressing infertility for these patients while avoiding IVF overuse.
Collapse
|
19
|
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Pascual MA, Rodriguez I, Piras A, Perniciano M, Saba L, Paoletti AM, Mais V, Alcazar JL. Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2020; 55:269-273. [PMID: 30977185 DOI: 10.1002/uog.20289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) soft markers as a first-line imaging tool to raise suspicion of rectosigmoid (RS) involvement in women suspected of having deep endometriosis. METHODS We included in this prospective observational study all patients with clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis who underwent diagnostic transvaginal US evaluation at our unit from January 2016 to February 2017. Several US soft markers were evaluated for prediction of RS involvement (presence of US signs of uterine adenomyosis, presence of an endometrioma, adhesion of the ovary to the uterus (reduced ovarian mobility), presence of 'kissing ovaries' (KO) and absence of the 'sliding sign'), using as the gold standard expert US examination for the presence of RS endometriosis. RESULTS Included were 333 patients with clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis. Of these, 106 had an US diagnosis of RS endometriosis by an expert. The only significant variables found in the prediction model were absence of the sliding sign (odds ratio (OR), 13.95; 95% CI, 7.7-25.3), presence of KO (OR, 22.5; 95% CI, 4.1-124.0) and the interaction between these two variables (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.004-0.28). Regarding their interaction, RS endometriosis was present when KO was absent and the sliding sign was present in 10% (19/190) of cases, when both KO and the sliding sign were present in 71.4% (5/7) of cases, when both KO and the sliding sign were absent in 60.8% (76/125) of cases and when KO was present and the sliding sign was absent in 54.5% (6/11) of cases. Thus, when the sliding sign was absent and/or KO was present, transvaginal US showed a specificity of 75% (95% CI, 69-80%) and a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, 73-88%). CONCLUSIONS US findings of absence of the sliding sign and/or presence of KO in patients with clinical suspicion of endometriosis should raise suspicion of RS involvement and indicate referral for expert US examination, with a low rate of false-negative diagnosis. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Guerriero
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy
| | - S Ajossa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - M A Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Rodriguez
- Unidad Epidemiología y Estadística, Departamento de Obstetricia, Ginecología y Reproducción, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Piras
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - M Perniciano
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - L Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
| | - A M Paoletti
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - V Mais
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - J L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The association between ultrasound-based ‘soft markers’ and endometriosis type/location: A prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 234:171-178. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 01/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
21
|
Assessment of the Influence on Spontaneous Pregnancy of Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:4901281. [PMID: 30327778 PMCID: PMC6171212 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4901281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective Our objective was to explore whether the pregnancy rate (PR) was higher than usual after hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of 1,008 infertility patients, all of whom were examined by HyCoSy. The expected time for spontaneous pregnancy was at least 180 days after the HyCoSy exams. There were three types of HyCoSy results: type I, defined as both fallopian tubes patent; type II, defined as one fallopian tube patent with obstruction in the other; and type III, defined as both fallopian tubes obstructed. During the HyCoSy examinations, we recorded the mobility of the ovaries, injective resistance, and contrast agent venous intravasation. Before the examinations, we recorded each patient's medical history, including maternal age, infertility type, median duration of menstrual cycle, dysmenorrhea, and parity number. Results The PR was 19.44% within 180 days after HyCoSy and it was significantly higher in the first 30 days (6.35%) (P <.01). The PR of type I was highest, with a rate of 32.01%, followed by the PR of type II (25.51%) and type III (15.04%) (P <.01). Univariate analysis showed that younger age, patency of both fallopian tubes, good ovarian mobility, and absence of injective resistance were positively related to the initiation of pregnancy (P <.01). Infertility type, median duration of menstrual cycle, dysmenorrhea, parity number, contrast agent venous intravasation, and identity of the sonographer were unrelated to pregnancy (P >.05). However, multivariate analysis showed that patency of both fallopian tubes and the absence of injective resistance were independently associated with pregnancy. Conclusion Some infertility patients conceived successfully and naturally not long after HyCoSy, most often in the first month after the examination. Multivariate analysis showed that patency of both fallopian tubes and the absence of injective resistance were independently factors associated with the ability to conceive after HyCoSy examination.
Collapse
|
22
|
Isolated Ovarian Endometrioma: A History Between Myth and Reality. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018; 25:884-891. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|