Prenatal identification of small-for-gestational age and risk of neonatal morbidity and stillbirth

Ultrasound Evaluation of the Changes of Ophthalmic Artery Doppler and Optic Nerve Sheath in Pregnant Women With FGR

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare changes in ultrasonic Doppler parameters, particularly the peak ratio (PR) of the ophthalmic artery (OA) and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR). Furthermore, it sought to evaluate differences in these parameters across various subgroups and analyze the cut-off value of PR for predicting delivery within 1 week in pregnancies complicated by FGR.

METHODS

A total of 62 pregnant women in the mid-to-late stages of gestation were enrolled, comprising 31 participants in the FGR group and 31 in the control group. The general conditions, pregnancy outcomes, Doppler parameters of the OA, and ONSD were compared between the two groups. Comparative analysis was performed to investigate differences in OA Doppler parameters and ONSD across FGR subgroups. The predictive value of PR for delivery within 1 week was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The PR of the OA was significantly elevated in the FGR group compared to the control group, demonstrating a statistically significant difference. The threshold PR value for predicting delivery within 1 week was 0.565, with a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.58.

CONCLUSIONS

The PR value of the OA in pregnant women with FGR is significantly increased and may serve as a reliable predictor for pregnancies complicated by FGR.

Efficacy of Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio in Predicting Adverse Fetal Outcomes in Cases of Fetal Growth Restriction Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a significant cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Differentiating FGR from small-for-gestational-age fetuses is critical for risk assessment. This study investigates the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) as a noninvasive predictor of adverse fetal outcomes, particularly neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), and birth weight variability.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre study included 60 pregnant women (gestational age 28-34 weeks) divided into normal and abnormal CPR groups. Doppler ultrasonography assessed umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility indices. Statistical analysis included receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for CPR, UA, and MCA indices to predict adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Abnormal CPR correlated with increased NICU admissions (46.7%), IUFD (10%), and lower birth weight (mean: 2138 g). Elevated UA PI and reduced MCA PI were observed in the abnormal CPR group. Sensitivity and specificity analyses identified CPR (cutoff: 1.1) as a modestly accurate predictor of adverse outcomes.

DISCUSSION

CPR effectively stratifies risk in high-risk pregnancies but requires further validation. Abnormal Doppler findings highlight placental insufficiency and compromised cerebral perfusion. These findings could refine FGR management strategies.

CustOmized versus standard fundal-height measuREments for the detection of small-for-gestational age fetuses in low-risk women (CORE study): A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the proportion of small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants detected by routine care versus a growth assessment protocol using customized fundal-height charts in low-risk pregnancies of a developing country.

METHODS

An open label randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Fatima Memorial Hospital (NUR International University, Pakistan). Low-risk pregnant women were randomly allocated to routine care (Mcdonald's rule for fundal height measurements followed by referral for scan with discrepancy of 3 cm from gestational age and a contingency third trimester scan) or the growth assessment protocol (GAP) developed by the Perinatal Institute (UK), which consists of the use of gestation-related optimal weight (GROW) customized charts, alongside management protocols for suspected SGA fetuses, audit tools and training. The primary prespecified outcome was the detection of SGA (defined as a birthweight <10th centile).

RESULTS

Of the 2535 eligible women, 1884 (74%) were randomized (942 to standard care and 942 to GAP). After loss-to-follow-up, 1755 women were analyzed (874 in the standard measurement group and 881 in the GAP group). The detection rate of SGA infants was higher in the GAP group (83.2% [95% CI: 74.4%-89.9%] vs. 29% [95% CI: 20.4%-38.9%], P < 0.001), at the cost of an increased false positive rate (10.4% [95% CI: 8.3%-12.7%] vs. 1.4% [95% CI: 0.7%-2.5%], P < 0.001). The diagnostic odds ratio (positive likelihood ratio/negative likelihood ratio) was 42.6 (95% CI: 24.1-75.4) in the GAP group and 28.3 (95% CI:13.6-59.1) in the standard care group.

CONCLUSION

In low-risk pregnant women of a developing country, a growth assessment protocol based on customized fundal-height charts is superior to standard measurements for the antenatal detection of SGA in newborns.

3rd trimester ultrasound assessment

The third-trimester scan allows not only the assessment of foetal growth but also its presentation and anatomy, and placental, amniotic fluid, and umbilical cord anomalies. Although there is a great disparity when considering its recommendation, most recent studies raise the question for its usefulness considering its impact in a potential reduction of perinatal morbidity and mortality. For this to be a reality in a population-wide setting, a systematic approach should be made considering performing it between 35 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks', including the assessment of estimated foetal weight, foetal Doppler (umbilical and middle cerebral artery), placenta, amniotic fluid, foetal anatomy, and presentation. In high-risk cases, additional evaluation of the placenta, umbilical cord, or advanced foetal anatomy assessment can be warranted. Furthermore, pre-defined and evidence-based protocols should be followed after anomalies are detected in order to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Differential Expression of Maternal Plasma microRNAs and Their Respective Gene Targets Can Predict Early Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a condition where the fetus does not reach its genetically predetermined size, affecting 1 in 10 pregnancies and contributing to up to 50% of all stillbirths before 34 weeks of gestation. Current diagnostic methods primarily involve ultrasound and Doppler assessments, yet there is growing interest in identifying biomarkers for early diagnosis and improved management. This systematic review examined the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the pathogenesis of FGR, focusing on their potential as non-invasive biomarkers. MicroRNAs are small, non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression. This review systematically assessed studies investigating the differential expression of miRNAs in maternal blood, serum, and plasma samples from FGR-affected pregnancies. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria, which showed the differential expression of a total of 48 miRNAs. miR-16-5p was consistently upregulated in multiple studies and trimesters. miR-590-3p and miR-206 were consistently upregulated in multiple trimesters. The common gene targets of these miRNAs are VEGF, PIGF, and MMP9. The downregulation of these genes contributes to impaired angiogenesis, trophoblast invasion, placental function, and fetal growth.

Causal Relationships Between Leukocyte Subsets and Adverse Fetal Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Background: The tolerance and dynamic regulation of the maternal immune system during pregnancy are pivotal for ensuring fetal health. Immune cell subsets play a complex and crucial role in this process, closely linked to the neonatal health status. Despite recognizing the significance of dysregulation in the quantity and activity of immune cells in neonatal disease occurrence, their specific roles remain elusive, resulting in a dearth of clinically viable interventions for immune-mediated neonatal diseases. Materials and Methods: Employing two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) methodology, this study systematically investigated 446 leukocyte features (N = 500,675), including leukocyte subsets, absolute cell (AC) counts, and morphological parameters (MP) and their correlation with seven adverse fetal outcomes (N = 1,100,458), encompassing fetal growth restriction (FGR), preterm birth (PTB), neonatal jaundice (NNJ), digestive system disorders of fetus and newborn (DSDFN), hemorrhagic and hematological disorders of fetus and newborn (HDFN), respiratory distress of newborn (RDN), and transitory disorders of metabolism specific to fetus and newborn (TDMSFN). Results: The results unveiled significant causal relationships between 301 leukocyte subsets and these seven adverse fetal outcomes, with 259, 245, 15, 44, 11, 32, and 68 pairs of notable associations for each adverse outcome, respectively. Furthermore, the study highlighted potential pathogenic mechanisms underlying the mutual influence among neonatal diseases. MR results indicated FGR as a robustly correlated risk factor for PTB and NNJ and showed a reciprocal causal relationship between NNJ and FGR. PTB exhibited a positive correlation with HDFN. Conclusions: This study provided profound insights into the intricate regulatory mechanisms of leukocyte subsets in neonatal diseases, paving the way for new avenues in the diagnosis and treatment of associated disorders.

Evaluation of fetal heart size, morphology and function with fetal growth restriction using fetal HQ

BACKGROUND

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with various perinatal complications. Limited research has focused on the fetal heart in the context of FGR. This study aimed to investigate the application value of fetal heart quantification (HQ) technology in evaluating the size, morphology, and function of the heart in FGR.

METHODS

A total of 31 fetuses diagnosed with FGR in our hospital from April 2022 to May 2024 were included, alongside another 31 normal fetuses matched for gestational age as the control group. Ultrasound Doppler parameters of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), umbilical artery (UA), venous catheter, and fetal HQ parameters were collected for comparative analysis, and perinatal data were followed up.

RESULTS

Fetuses with FGR exhibited significant differences in various parameters of the MCA and UA compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The four-chamber view end-diastolic transverse width, end-diastolic area, left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic area, end-systolic area, end-systolic length, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and right ventricular (RV) end-systolic area in the FGR group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In the 24-segment analysis, the LV fractional shortening in the FGR group was greater than in the control group at segments 12 to 14, while the end-diastolic diameter (ED) at segments 5 to 13 of the LV and segments 1 to 14 of the RV were smaller than those in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Analysis of each subgroup indicated that fractional shortening (FS) in the early-onset group was significantly greater than in the late-onset group at RV segments 2 to 8. LV-ED at segments 1 to 15 and RV-ED at segments 1 to 16 were significantly smaller in the early-onset group than in the control group, and LV ED segments 20 to 21 were significantly smaller in the early-onset group compared to the late-onset group (P < 0.05). FS in the mild group was significantly larger than in the normal group at LV segments 10 to 16. The severe group exhibited significantly smaller LV segment 2 to 11 ED and the mild group showed smaller RV segments 1 to 13 compared to the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal HQ is a promising technique for evaluating the cardiac function, size, and morphology in cases of FGR.

Fetal MRI-Based Body and Adiposity Quantification for Small for Gestational Age Perinatal Risk Stratification

BACKGROUND

Small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses are at risk for perinatal adverse outcomes. Fetal body composition reflects the fetal nutrition status and hold promise as potential prognostic indicator. MRI quantification of fetal anthropometrics may enhance SGA risk stratification.

HYPOTHESIS

Smaller, leaner fetuses are malnourished and will experience unfavorable outcomes.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

40 SGA fetuses, 26 (61.9%) females: 10/40 (25%) had obstetric interventions due to non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS), and 17/40 (42.5%) experienced adverse neonatal events (CANO). Participants underwent MRI between gestational ages 30 + 2 and 37 + 2.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3-T, True Fast Imaging with Steady State Free Precession (TruFISP) and T1-weighted two-point Dixon (T1W Dixon) sequences.

ASSESSMENT

Total body volume (TBV), fat signal fraction (FSF), and the fat-to-body volumes ratio (FBVR) were extracted from TruFISP and T1W Dixon images, and computed from automatic fetal body and subcutaneous fat segmentations by deep learning. Subjects were followed until hospital discharge, and obstetric interventions and neonatal adverse events were recorded.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions for the association between TBV, FBVR, and FSF and interventions for NRFS and CANO. Fisher's exact test was used to measure the association between sonographic FGR criteria and perinatal outcomes. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

FBVR (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-0.76) and FSF (OR 0.95, CI 0.91-0.99) were linked with NRFS interventions. Furthermore, TBV (OR 0.69, CI 0.56-0.86) and FSF (OR 0.96, CI 0.93-0.99) were linked to CANO. The FBVR sensitivity/specificity for obstetric interventions was 85.7%/87.5%, and the TBV sensitivity/specificity for CANO was 82.35%/86.4%. The sonographic criteria sensitivity/specificity for obstetric interventions was 100%/33.3% and insignificant for CANO (P = 0.145).

DATA CONCLUSION

Reduced TBV and FBVR may be associated with higher rates of obstetric interventions for NRFS and CANO.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Neonatal Outcomes of Infants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction during Late Pregnancy versus after Birth

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential differences in the outcomes of neonates in whom FGR was diagnosed late in pregnancy as compared to those in whom growth restriction was diagnosed after birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary medical center between 2017 and 2019. The study included women carrying a single infant with an estimated fetal weight below the tenth percentile in whom FGR was diagnosed during late pregnancy, after 32 gestational weeks (known late-onset FGR; study group) or only after birth (unknown FGR; control group). Data were collected by review of the electronic health records. The primary outcome measure was the rate of composite adverse neonatal outcome. Results: A total of 328 women were included, 77 (23.47%) in the known-FGR group and 251 (75.53%) in the unknown-FGR group. In the known-FGR group, an etiology for the FGR was identified in 28.57% cases, most commonly placental insufficiency (21.74%). Compared to the unknown-FGR group, the known-FGR group was characterized by significantly higher rates of elective cesarean delivery (15.58% vs. 9.96%, p < 0.001), preterm birth (18.18% vs. 3.98%, p < 0.01), and labor induction (67.53% vs. 21.51%, p < 0.01). A significantly higher proportion of neonates in the known-FGR group had a positive composite adverse outcome (38.96% vs. 15.53%, p < 0.01). For multivariate regression analysis adjusted for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, and mode of delivery, there was no difference between groups in the primary outcome (aOR 1.73, CI 0.89-3.35, p = 0.1). Every additional gestational week at delivery was a protective factor (aOR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, p < 0.01). Conclusions: A prenatal diagnosis of late-onset FGR is associated with higher intervention and preterm birth rates as compared to a diagnosis made after birth. Fetuses diagnosed with late-onset FGR during pregnancy should undergo specific and personalized assessment to determine the cause and severity of the growth delay and the best management strategy. This study highlights the importance of careful decision-making regarding the induction of labor in late-onset FGR.

Routine third-trimester ultrasound assessment for intrauterine growth restriction

Intrauterine growth restriction significantly impacts perinatal outcomes. Undetected IUGR escalates the risk of adverse outcomes. Serial symphysis-fundal height measurement, a recommended strategy, is insufficient in detecting abnormal fetal growth. Routine third-trimester ultrasounds significantly improve detection rates compared with this approach, but direct high-quality evidence supporting enhanced perinatal outcomes from routine scanning is lacking. In assessing fetal growth, abdominal circumference alone performs comparably to estimated fetal weight. Hadlock formulas demonstrate accurate fetal weight estimation across diverse gestational ages and settings. When choosing growth charts, prescriptive standards (encompassing healthy pregnancies) should be prioritized over descriptive ones. Customized fetal standards may enhance antenatal IUGR detection, but conclusive high-quality evidence is elusive. Emerging observational data suggest that longitudinal fetal growth assessment could predict adverse outcomes better. However, direct randomized trial evidence supporting this remains insufficient.

Abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index in appropriately grown fetuses in the early third trimester: an observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if appropriately grown fetuses (those that are not small-for-gestational-age) with a raised umbilical artery pulsatility index (>95th centile) in the mid third trimester are at increased risk of placental dysfunction and adverse outcome.

METHODS

This is a 5-year retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data. Inclusion criteria were singleton, non-anomalous pregnancies having a growth scan with umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry between 28 + 0 and 33 + 6 weeks' gestation. Small-for-gestational-age fetuses were excluded. Cases were classified as group 1 (those with an umbilical artery pulsatility index >95th centile at any scan during target window) or group 2 (those where the umbilical artery pulsatility index was ≤95th centile at all scans). p-Values and odds ratios were calculated. Logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios adjusted for baseline estimated weight z-score, gestational age at delivery, and labor induction.

RESULTS

After exclusions, there were 202 pregnancies in group 1 and 7950 in group 2. Differences in baseline characteristics between the groups include age (median age was 30 for group 1 and 32 for group 2, p < .001), smoking (group 1 were more likely to smoke, p < .001) and labor induction (more common in group 1, p = .03). Among those delivering ≥34 + 0, group 1 were more likely to be small-for-gestational-age and have an abnormal cerebro-placental ratio at the final scan (OR 6.76, CI 4.23-10.80 and OR 5.07, CI 3.37-7.63 respectively), and to develop features of growth restriction (OR 9.85, CI 6.27-15.49). Group 1 were also more likely to deliver <37 + 0 weeks' gestation (OR 1.71, CI 1.13-2.58) and to have birthweight <10th or <3rd centile (OR 5.26, CI 3.65-7.58 and OR 6.13, CI 3.00-12.54 respectively). These associations remained significant when adjusted for estimated weight at the initial scan.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that raised umbilical artery pulsatility index in an appropriately grown fetus at 28 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks' gestation is associated with subsequent development of growth restriction markers and an increased risk of moderate and severe small-for-gestational-age at birth. This is independent of the estimated weight of these babies at the index scan.

Screening for small for gestational age infants in early vs late third-trimester ultrasonography: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that a routine third-trimester ultrasound scan may improve the detection of small for gestational age infants when compared with clinically indicated ultrasound scans but with no reported reduction in severe perinatal morbidity. Establishing the optimal gestational age for the third-trimester examination necessitates evaluation of the ability to detect small for gestational age infants and to predict maternal and perinatal outcomes. Intrauterine growth restriction most often corresponds with small for gestational age infants associated with pathologic growth patterns.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the performance of routine early ultrasound scans vs late ultrasound scans during the third trimester of pregnancy to identify small for gestational age infants and fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an open-label, randomized, parallel trial conducted in Upper Normandy, France, from 2012 to 2015. The study eligibility criteria were heathy, nulliparous women older than 18 years with gestational age determined using the crown-rump length at the first trimester routine scan and with no fetal malformation or suspected small for gestational age fetus at the routine second trimester scan. Pregnant women were randomly assigned to a third-trimester scan group at 31 weeks gestational age ±6 days (early ultrasound scan) or at 35 weeks gestational age ±6 days (late ultrasound scan). The primary outcome of this trial was the ability of a third trimester scan to predict small for gestational age infants (customized birth weight <10th percentile) and intrauterine growth restriction (customized birth weight

RESULTS

Results from 1853 women assigned to the early ultrasound scan group and 1848 women assigned to the late ultrasound scan group were analyzed. The sensitivity was found to be higher in the late ultrasound scan group than in the early ultrasound scan group, both for identifying small for gestational age infants (27%; 22%-32% vs 17%; 13%-22%; P=.004) and intrauterine growth restriction (44%; 35%-54% vs 18%; 11%-27%; P<.001). There was little difference in the specificity between the late ultrasound scan and early ultrasound scan groups in identifying cases of small for gestational age (97%; 96%-98% and 98%; 97%-99%, respectively; P=.04) and intrauterine growth restriction (96%; 95%-97% and 97%; 96%;-97%, respectively; P=.24). Overall, the maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the early ultrasound scan and late ultrasound scan groups with the exception of additional (at least 1) ultrasound scans performed (25% in the early ultrasound scan group vs 19% in the late ultrasound scan group; P<.001). Rates of perinatal death (0.4% vs 0.8%; P=.12) and adverse perinatal outcomes (1.8% vs 2.7%; P=.08) were comparable between the early ultrasound scan and late ultrasound scan assigned groups, and the overall sensitivity to detect small for gestational age infants and intrauterine growth restriction, including in the last ultrasound scan performed before delivery, were also similar (30%; 25%-36% vs 26%; 21%-31%; P=.23; and 50%; 40%-60% vs 38%; 28%-48%; P=.07).

CONCLUSION

A late ultrasound scan performed in the third trimester increases the probability of detecting small for gestational age infants and intrauterine growth restriction with fewer additional scans reported than for the early ultrasound scan group. The overall perinatal outcome risk was comparable between the 2 groups. However, the overall sensitivity for detecting small for gestational age fetuses and intrauterine growth restriction, including in the last ultrasound scan performed before delivery, remains comparable between the late ultrasound scan and early ultrasound scan groups.

Collapse

Key Words

• intrauterine growth restriction
• perinatal mortality and morbidity
• screening
• small for gestational age
• ultrasonography

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Female
• Humans
• Pregnancy
• Birth Weight
• Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnostic imaging
• Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology
• Gestational Age
• Pregnancy Trimester, Third
• Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Eric Verspyck Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs Verspyck, Brasseur-Daudruy, Braund, and Benichou).
Caroline Thill Department of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Dr Thill)
Anne Ego University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Public Health Department CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institute of Engineering, TIMC-IMAG, 38000 Grenoble, France (Dr Ego); INSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), FHU PREMA, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France (Dr Ego)
Elise Machevin Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Evreux Hospital, Evreux, France (Dr Machevin)
Marie Brasseur-Daudruy Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs Verspyck, Brasseur-Daudruy, Braund, and Benichou)
Valentine Ickowicz Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Belvedere Hospital, Mont Saint Aignan, France (Dr Ickowicz)
Caroline Blondel Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mathilde Private Clinic, Rouen, France (Dr Blondel)
Sophie Degré Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Le Havre Hospital, Le Havre, France (Dr Degré)
Anne Lefebure Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elbeuf Hospital, Elbeuf, France (Dr Lefebure)
Sophia Braund Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs Verspyck, Brasseur-Daudruy, Braund, and Benichou)
Jacques Benichou Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Drs Verspyck, Brasseur-Daudruy, Braund, and Benichou); Inserm U1018, University of Rouen and University Paris-Saclay, Rouen, France (Dr Benichou); Department of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France (Dr Benichou)

Collapse

Risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and severe neonatal morbidity by birthweight centiles associated with expectant management at term

BACKGROUND

Determining the optimal time of birth at term is challenging given the ongoing risks of stillbirth with increasing gestation vs the risks of significant neonatal morbidity at early-term gestations. These risks are more pronounced in small infants.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and severe neonatal morbidity by comparing expectant management with delivery from 37+0 weeks of gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating women with singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies at 37+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation in Queensland, Australia, delivered from 2000 to 2018. Rates of stillbirth, neonatal death, and severe neonatal morbidity were calculated for <3rd, 3rd to <10th, 10th to <25th, 25th to <90th, and ≥90th birthweight centiles. The composite risk of mortality with expectant management for an additional week in utero was compared with rates of neonatal mortality and severe neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS

Of 948,895 singleton, term nonanomalous births, 813,077 occurred at 37+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation. Rates of stillbirth increased with gestational age, with the highest rate observed in infants with birthweight below the third centile: 10.0 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval, 6.2-15.3) at 37+0 to 37+6 weeks, rising to 106.4 per 10,000 (95% confidence interval, 74.6-146.9) at 40+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation. The rate of neonatal mortality was highest at 37+0 to 37+6 weeks for all birthweight centiles. The composite risk of expectant management rose sharply after 39+0 to 39+6 weeks, and was highest in infants with birthweight below the third centile (125.2/10,000; 95% confidence interval, 118.4-132.3) at 40+0 to 40+6 weeks' gestation. Balancing the risk of expectant management and delivery (neonatal mortality), the optimal timing of delivery for each birthweight centile was evaluated on the basis of relative risk differences. The rate of severe neonatal morbidity sharply decreased in the period between 37+0 to 37+6 and 38+0 to 38+6 weeks, particularly for infants with birthweight below the third centile.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the optimal time of birth is 37+0 to 37+6 weeks for infants with birthweight <3rd centile and 38+0 to 38+6 weeks' gestation for those with birthweight between the 3rd and 10th centile and >90th centile. For all other birthweight centiles, birth from 39+0 weeks is associated with the best outcomes. However, large numbers of planned births are required to prevent a single excess death. The healthcare costs and acceptability to women of potential universal policies of planned birth need to be carefully considered.

Similarity network fusion to identify phenotypes of small-for-gestational-age fetuses

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) affects 5-10% of pregnancies, is the largest contributor to fetal death, and can have long-term consequences for the child. Implementation of a standard clinical classification system is hampered by the multiphenotypic spectrum of small fetuses with substantial differences in perinatal risks. Machine learning and multiomics data can potentially revolutionize clinical decision-making in FGR by identifying new phenotypes. Herein, we describe a cluster analysis of FGR based on an unbiased machine-learning method. Our results confirm the existence of two subtypes of human FGR with distinct molecular and clinical features based on multiomic analysis. In addition, we demonstrated that clusters generated by machine learning significantly outperform single data subtype analysis and biologically support the current clinical classification in predicting adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our approach can aid in the refinement of clinical classification systems for FGR supported by molecular and clinical signatures.

Th17 / Treg ratio: A prospective study in a group of pregnant women with preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction

INTRODUCTION

During pregnancy, the maternal immune system is challenged to tolerate a semi-allogenic fetus. A proinflammatory profile has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes and poor placental development. In this study, the authors evaluated the number of circulating Tregs and Th17 cells in a group of patients diagnosed with preeclampsia(PE) and fetal growth restriction(FGR).

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal observational study where peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were analyzed in a cohort of pregnant patients with PE, FGR, and a control group of healthy pregnant women.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of PE was associated with a significative higher number of circulating Th17 cells and a significative relative reduction in the Treg cell count. This proinflammatory profile was also expressed in the evolution of the Th17/ CD4+CD25highFOXP3+ Treg ratio. In the FGR group, the Th17 cell count was significantly higher during the third trimester of pregnancy. This proinflammatory profile was also expressed in the evolution of the Th17/ CD4+CD25highFOXP3+ Treg ratio. When we compare the immunological profiles of patients with PE and FGR we observed a higher number of proinflammatory Th17 cells and a significative lower number of Treg cells in PE patients. This is particularly expressed in the differences found between the Th17/ CD4+CD25highFOXP3+ Treg ratios of these two groups. Discussion/Conclusion Our data showed a that a proinflammatory profile and a relative excess of Th17 cells was associated with the diagnosis of PE and FGR. A more exuberant systemic proinflammatory profile present in the PE patients is absent in patients with FGR without preeclampsia.

Implication of third-trimester screening accuracy for small-for-gestational age and additive value of third-trimester growth-trajectory indicators in predicting severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: pragmatic secondary analysis of IRIS study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the implications of third-trimester small-for-gestational-age (SGA) screening accuracy on severe adverse perinatal outcome (SAPO) and obstetric intervention in a low-risk population. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the additive value of third-trimester sonographic growth-trajectory measurements in predicting SAPO and obstetric intervention.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a Dutch national multicenter stepped-wedge-cluster randomized trial among 11 820 low-risk pregnant women. Using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis, we compared SAPO and obstetric interventions in SGA neonates with and without SGA suspected prenatally (true positives and false negatives) and non-SGA neonates with and without SGA suspected prenatally (false positives and true negatives). In a subsample (n = 7989), we analyzed the associations of abdominal circumference (AC) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) < 10th centile (p10) and third-trimester growth-trajectory indicators AC and EFW crossing > 20 and AC crossing > 50 centiles and the lowest decile of AC growth-velocity Z-scores (ACGV < 10%) with SAPO and obstetric interventions.

RESULTS

SGA infants, i.e. the true-positive and false-negative cases, had an increased risk of SAPO (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.46 (95% CI, 2.28-8.75) and aOR 2.61 (95% CI, 1.74-3.89), respectively), and obstetric intervention (aOR for: induction of labor, 2.99 (95% CI, 2.15-4.17) and 1.38 (95% CI, 1.14-1.66); Cesarean section, 1.82 (95% CI, 1.25-2.66) and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.05-1.54); medically indicated preterm delivery, 2.67 (95% CI, 1.97-3.62) and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.03-1.40)). The false-positive cases did not differ from the true negatives for all outcomes, including obstetric intervention. Of the third-trimester growth-trajectory indicators, only ACGV < 10% was associated moderately with SAPO (aOR, 2.15 (95% CI, 1.17-3.97)), while AC and EFW crossing > 20 and AC crossing > 50 centiles were not. Both EFW < p10 alone (aOR, 1.95 (95% CI, 1.13-3.38)) and EFW < p10 combined with ACGV < 10% (aOR, 4.69 (95% CI, 1.99-11.07)) were associated with SAPO, and they performed equally well in predicting SAPO (area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76) vs 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.77), P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Neonates who had been suspected falsely of being SGA during pregnancy had no higher rates of obstetric intervention than did those without suspicion of SGA prenatally. Our results do not support that third-trimester low fetal growth velocity (ACGV < 10%) may be of additive value for the identification of fetuses at risk of SAPO in populations remaining at low risk throughout pregnancy. AC and EFW crossing > 20 and AC crossing > 50 centiles performed poorly in identifying abnormal fetal growth. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Influence of chest/head circumference ratio at birth on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: The Japan environment and children's study

OBJECTIVES

Some newborns that are not small-for-gestational-age (non-SGA, birthweight ≥10th percentile for a given gestational age) may have pathologic growth restrictions. This study examined the association of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes with chest/head circumference ratio at birth in non-SGA and SGA newborns.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional evaluation of data from a nationwide prospective birth cohort study, the Japan Environment and Children's Study. We analyzed 93 690 non-anomalous singletons born at 34-41 gestational weeks. We defined low, normal, and high chest/head circumference ratio as <10th percentile, 10th-90th percentile, and >90th percentile, respectively, according to the internally constructed chest/head circumference percentile chart. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for the outcomes studied.

RESULTS

Compared with non-SGA newborns with a normal ratio, those with a low ratio had an increased occurrence of low birthweight (1.75, 1.58-1.94 [aPR, 95% confidence interval]), cesarean delivery (1.34, 1.29-1.38), Apgar score <7 at 5 min (1.57, 1.14-2.17), respiratory complications (1.20, 1.04-1.39), and prolonged hospitalization (1.36, 1.30-1.42). In contrast, the high-ratio group had a lower rate of low birthweight (0.71, 0.59-0.86), cesarean delivery (0.82, 0.77-0.87), and prolonged hospitalization (0.83, 0.78-0.89). In SGA newborns, a low ratio was associated with increased aPRs for low birthweight, cesarean delivery, hypoglycemia, and prolonged hospitalization, whereas a high ratio showed no such association.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that the chest/head circumference ratio at birth influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes regardless of the birthweight status.

Risk factors for late preterm and term stillbirth: A secondary analysis of an individual participant data meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Identify independent and novel risk factors for late-preterm (28-36 weeks) and term (≥37 weeks) stillbirth and explore development of a risk-prediction model.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of an Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis investigating modifiable stillbirth risk factors.

SETTING

An IPD database from five case-control studies in New Zealand, Australia, the UK and an international online study.

POPULATION

Women with late-stillbirth (cases, n = 851), and ongoing singleton pregnancies from 28 weeks' gestation (controls, n = 2257).

METHODS

Established and novel risk factors for late-preterm and term stillbirth underwent univariable and multivariable logistic regression modelling with multiple sensitivity analyses. Variables included maternal age, body mass index (BMI), parity, mental health, cigarette smoking, second-hand smoking, antenatal-care utilisation, and detailed fetal movement and sleep variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Independent risk factors with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for late-preterm and term stillbirth.

RESULTS

After model building, 575 late-stillbirth cases and 1541 controls from three contributing case-control studies were included. Risk factor estimates from separate multivariable models of late-preterm and term stillbirth were compared. As these were similar, the final model combined all late-stillbirths. The single multivariable model confirmed established demographic risk factors, but additionally showed that fetal movement changes had both increased (decreased frequency) and reduced (hiccoughs, increasing strength, frequency or vigorous fetal movements) aOR of stillbirth. Poor antenatal-care utilisation increased risk while more-than-adequate care was protective. The area-under-the-curve was 0.84 (95% CI 0.82-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Similarities in risk factors for late-preterm and term stillbirth suggest the same approach for risk-assessment can be applied. Detailed fetal movement assessment and inclusion of antenatal-care utilisation could be valuable in late-stillbirth risk assessment.

Middle cerebral artery to uterine artery pulsatility index ratios in pregnancy with fetal growth restriction regarding negative perinatal outcomes

Background/Aim: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) causes a high risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality, and the timing of the correct delivery time decision remains controversial. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), umbilical artery, uterine artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler studies are used to predict adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR. However, since there is insufficient reliability for each separately and together, the search for new methods continues. This retrospective study was conducted to determine the degree of neonatal morbidity in fetuses suspected of having FGR by evaluating the MCA to UA pulsatility index (PI) ratios together with frequently used Doppler examinations. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single-center hospital with the approval of the Medical Institutional Ethics Committee. A total of 424 pregnant women admitted to a tertiary hospital and diagnosed with FGR between July 2020 and December 2021 who were informed and approved were included in the study. Gestational age was confirmed by first trimester sonographic measurements of pregnancy. All pregnant women were examined by Doppler USG and umbilical artery, mean UA, fetal MCA, ductus venosus, CPR (MCA/umbilical artery pulsatility index ratio) and cerebrouterine ratio (MCA/UA) PI values were measured. Negative perinatal outcomes were recorded as blood gas level of the newborn at 7.2 and below, Apgar score of 7 and below at the fifth minute, and needing neonatal intensive care (NICU). Adverse perinatal and postnatal outcomes were recorded and compared with Doppler findings. If there were no signs of a negative perinatal outcome, it was considered a positive outcome. If at least one of the symptoms of adverse perinatal outcomes was present, it was considered a negative outcome Results: Decreased CPR and decreased MCA to UA PI were significantly and positively associated with an increased likelihood of exhibiting negative perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with FGR (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value for MCA to uterine artery PI was 1.41 to predict FGR with 57.37% sensitivity and 62.50% specificity (AUC: 0.629; 95% CI: 0.581–0.675). When the CPR cut-off value was taken as 1.2069, the sensitivity was 42.86% and the specificity 83.93% in predicting negative perinatal outcomes in CPR values below this value (P < 0.001). Conclusion: CPR is the most successful criterion in distinguishing between positive and negative perinatal outcomes. It has been demonstrated that the MCA to uterine artery PI ratio values after CPR can also be used for this distinction. MCA to UA PI ratio sensitivity was higher than CPR and umbilical artery. This situation shows that MCA to uterine artery PI ratio (alone or when evaluated together with PPV and NPV ratios) is a criterion that can be added to other Doppler examinations in predicting negative perinatal outcomes.

Severe smallness as predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in suspected late small-for-gestational-age fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance of severe smallness in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome among fetuses with suspected late-onset small-for-gestational age (SGA).

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Late-onset SGA was defined as estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) < 10^th percentile diagnosed at or after 32 weeks' gestation, while severe SGA was defined as EFW or AC < 3^rd percentile or < 2 SD. Random-effects modeling was used to generate hierarchical summary receiver-operating-characteristics (HSROC) curves. The performance of severe SGA (as a presumptive diagnosis) in predicting adverse perinatal outcome among singleton pregnancies with suspected late-onset SGA was expressed as area under the HSROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and positive/negative likelihood ratios. The association between suspected severe SGA and adverse perinatal outcome was also assessed by random-effects modeling using the Mantel-Haenszel method and presented as odds ratio (OR). The non-exposed group was defined as non-severe SGA (EFW ≥ 3^rd centile).

RESULTS

Twelve cohort studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies included a total of 3639 fetuses with suspected late-onset SGA, of which 1246 had suspected severe SGA. Significant associations were found between suspected severe SGA and composite adverse perinatal outcome (OR, 1.97 (95% CI, 1.33-2.92)), neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR, 2.87 (95% CI, 1.84-4.47)) and perinatal death (OR, 4.26 (95% CI, 1.07-16.93)). However, summary ROC curves showed limited performance of suspected severe SGA in predicting perinatal outcomes, with AUCs of 60.9%, 66.9%, 53.6%, 57.2%, 54.6% and 64.9% for composite adverse perinatal outcome, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal acidosis, Cesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise, low Apgar score and perinatal death, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although suspected severe SGA was associated with a higher risk of perinatal complications, it performed poorly as a standalone parameter in predicting adverse perinatal outcome. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters

The aim of this study was to identify growth-restricted fetuses using biometric parameters and to assess the validity and clinical value of individual ultrasound parameters and ratios, such as transcerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference (TCD/AC), head circumference/abdominal circumference (HC/AC), and femur length/abdominal circumference (FL/AC). In a retrospective single-center cross-sectional study, the biometric data of 9292 pregnancies between the 15th and 42nd weeks of gestation were acquired. Statistical analysis included descriptive data, quantile regression estimating the 10th and 90th percentiles, and multivariable analysis. We obtained clinically noticeable results in predicting small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) fetuses at advanced weeks of gestation using the AC with a Youden index of 0.81 and 0.96, respectively. The other individual parameters and quotients were less suited to identifying cases of SGA and FGR. The multivariable analysis demonstrated the best results for identifying SGA and FGR fetuses with an area under the curve of 0.95 and 0.96, respectively. The individual ultrasound parameters were better suited to identifying SGA and FGR than the ratios. Amongst these, the AC was the most promising individual parameter, especially at advanced weeks of gestation. However, the highest accuracy was achieved with a multivariable model.

Clinical phenotypes for risk stratification in small-for-gestational-age fetuses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether clinical phenotypes of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses can be identified and used for adverse perinatal outcome risk stratification to facilitate clinical decision-making.

METHODS

This was a multicenter observational cohort study conducted in two tertiary care university hospitals. SGA fetuses were classified according to maternal, fetal and placental conditions using a two-step cluster algorithm, in which fetuses with more than one condition were assigned to the cluster associated with the highest mortality risk. Delivery and perinatal outcomes were compared using chi-square test among SGA clusters, and the associations between outcomes and each cluster were evaluated by calculating odds ratios (OR), adjusted for gestational age.

RESULTS

The study included 17 631 consecutive singleton pregnancies, of which 1274 (7.2%) were defined as SGA at birth according to INTERGROWTH-21^st standards. Nine SGA clinical phenotypes were identified using a predefined conceptual framework. All delivery and perinatal outcomes analyzed were significantly different among the nine phenotypes. The whole SGA cohort had a three-times higher risk of perinatal mortality compared with non-SGA fetuses (1.4% vs 0.4%; P < 0.001). SGA clinical phenotypes exhibited three patterns of perinatal mortality risk: the highest risk was associated with congenital anomaly (8.3%; OR, 17.17 (95% CI, 2.17-136.12)) and second- or third-trimester hemorrhage (8.3%; OR, 9.94 (95% CI, 1.23-80.02)) clusters; medium risk was associated with gestational diabetes (3.8%; OR, 9.59 (95% CI, 1.27-72.57)), preterm birth (3.2%; OR, 4.65 (95% CI, 0.62-35.01)) and intrauterine growth restriction (3.1%; OR, 5.93 (95% CI, 3.21-10.95)) clusters; and the lowest risk was associated with the remaining clusters. Perinatal mortality rate did not differ between SGA fetuses without other clinical conditions (54.1% of SGA fetuses) and appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses (0.1% vs 0.4%; OR, 0.41 (95% CI, 0.06-2.94); P = 0.27). SGA combined with other obstetric pathologies increased significantly the risk of perinatal mortality, as demonstrated by the increased odds of perinatal death in SGA cases with gestational diabetes compared to non-SGA cases with the same condition (OR, 24.40 (95% CI, 1.31-453.91)).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified nine SGA clinical phenotypes associated with different patterns of risk for adverse perinatal outcome. Our findings suggest that considering clinical characteristics in addition to ultrasound findings could improve risk stratification and decision-making for management of SGA fetuses. Future clinical trials investigating management of fetuses with SGA should take into account clinical information in addition to Doppler parameters and estimated fetal weight. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The utility of foetal splenic artery Doppler measurement in the diagnosis of late-onset foetal growth restriction

We aimed to examine the contribution of splenic artery (SA) Doppler parameters in the detection of foetuses with late-onset foetal growth restriction (LO-FGR) and to evaluate its power in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes. Within the study's scope, 52 cases in the LO-FGR group and 92 cases in the control group were evaluated. The criteria determined in the Delphi procedure by an international consensus were used to define the LO-FGR. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) and SA PI were significantly lower in the LO-FGR group (p: .002, p<.001, respectively). Likewise, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was significantly lower in the LO-FGR group (p<.001). Decreased CPR and decreased SA PI were significantly and positively associated with an increased likelihood of exhibiting adverse obstetric outcome (p<.001, p: .012, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value for SA PI was 1.41 to predict LO-FGR with 70.7% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity (AUC = 0.684; 95% CI, 0.594-0.774).Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The main clinical difficulty in late-onset foetal growth restriction (LO-FGR) is the detection of the disease.What do the results of this study add? The splenic artery (SA) pulsatility index (PI) may contribute to both diagnostic and the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes in LO-FGR cases. Our results showed that the SA PI value, as well as cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), can be a useful parameter in predicting negative outcomes.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Various degrees of uteroplacental insufficiency in foetuses with LO-FGR may be associated with abnormalities in SA Doppler velocimetry. Splenic artery Doppler velocimetry can be used for the clinical management of LO-FGR.

Genetic Background of Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the most formidable challenges in present-day antenatal care. Pathological fetal growth is a well-known factor of not only in utero demise in the third trimester, but also postnatal morbidity and unfavorable developmental outcomes, including long-term sequalae such as metabolic diseases, diabetic mellitus or hypertension. In this review, the authors present the current state of knowledge about the genetic disturbances responsible for FGR diagnosis, divided into fetal, placental and maternal causes (including preeclampsia), as well as their impact on prenatal diagnostics, with particular attention on chromosomal microarray (CMA) and noninvasive prenatal testing technique (NIPT).

Routine third-trimester ultrasound for the detection of small-for-gestational age in low-risk pregnancies (ROTTUS study): randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the proportion of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants detected by routine third-trimester ultrasound vs those detected by selective ultrasound based on serial symphysis-fundus height (SFH) measurements (standard care) in low-risk pregnancy.

METHODS

This was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at a hospital in Kenya between May 2018 and February 2020. Low-risk pregnant women were randomly allocated (ratio of 1:1) to routine ultrasound for fetal growth assessment between 36 + 0 and 37 + 6 weeks' gestation (intervention group) or to standard care, which involved a selective growth scan on clinical suspicion of fetal growth abnormality based on serial SFH measurements (control group). During ultrasound examination, fetal growth was assessed by measurement of the abdominal circumference (AC), and AC < 10^th centile was used to diagnose a SGA fetus. The main prespecified outcomes were the detection of neonatal SGA, defined as birth weight < 10^th centile, and of severe neonatal SGA, defined as birth weight < 3^rd centile. The predictive performance of routine third-trimester ultrasound and selective ultrasound based on serial SFH measurements was determined using receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC)-curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of 566 women assessed for eligibility, 508 (89.8%) were randomized, of whom 253 were allocated to the intervention group and 255 to the control group. Thirty-six babies in the intervention group and 26 in the control group had a birth weight < 10^th centile. The detection rate of SGA infants by routine third-trimester ultrasound vs that by standard care was 52.8% (19/36) vs 7.7% (2/26) (P < 0.001) and the specificity was 95.5% (191/200) and 97.9% (191/195), respectively (P = 0.08). The detection rate of severe SGA was 66.7% (12/18) by routine ultrasound vs 8.3% (1/12) by selective ultrasound based on SFH measurements (P < 0.001), with specificities of 91.7% (200/218) and 98.1% (205/209), respectively (P = 0.006). The area under the ROC curve of routine third-trimester ultrasound in prediction of SGA was significantly greater than that of selective ultrasound based on SFH measurements (0.92 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96) vs 0.68 (95% CI, 0.58-0.77); P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In low-risk pregnancy, routine ultrasound performed between 36 + 0 and 37 + 6 weeks is superior to selective ultrasound based on serial SFH measurements for the detection of true SGA, with high specificity. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Does detection of fetal growth restriction improve neonatal outcomes?

AIM

Timely delivery of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a balance between avoiding stillbirth and minimising prematurity. We sought to assess the neonatal outcomes for babies suspected of FGR, both true and false positives.

METHODS

This population cohort study examined all singleton births in Victoria, Australia from 2000 to 2017 (n = 1 231 415). Neonatal morbidities associated with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were assessed for babies born ≥32 weeks' with severe FGR (<3rd centile) and babies with birthweight ≥10th centile who were iatrogenically delivered for suspected FGR.

RESULTS

Babies with severe FGR iatrogenically delivered for suspected FGR were more likely to require NICU admission than babies with severe FGR who were not detected (3.0% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of NICU admission were increased (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.00, 95% confidence interval = 2.45-3.67; P < 0.001). Rates of NICU admission were also higher in ≥10th centile babies iatrogenically delivered for suspected FGR than for ≥10th centile babies who entered labour spontaneously (1.8% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustments, the odds of NICU admission were increased (aOR = 3.91, 95% confidence interval = 3.40-4.49; P < 0.001). NICU admissions were associated with morbidities related to iatrogenic prematurity.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection and planned delivery of FGR reduces stillbirth but may be associated with increased neonatal morbidity related to iatrogenic prematurity.

First-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age in pregnancies at false-positive high or intermediate risk for fetal aneuploidy

OBJECTIVES

To explore the risk of small-for-gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) and to test the performance of first-trimester screening for SGA and FGR in women with a false-positive high or intermediate risk for aneuploidy.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton pregnancy attending for a routine first-trimester scan. The risks of aneuploidy and preterm SGA (defined as birth weight < 10^th percentile with delivery before 37 weeks) were determined according to Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithms. In non-malformed euploid pregnancies, the predictive performance of both the aneuploidy and preterm SGA risks was evaluated for SGA, FGR (defined as birth weight < 3^rd centile), preterm SGA and early SGA (delivery before 34 weeks), using receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, in those with a high or intermediate risk of aneuploidy and in the overall population.

RESULTS

A total of 2053 pregnancies were included in the analysis, of which 191 (9.3%) were at high or intermediate risk for aneuploidy (≥ 1/1000) and 304 (14.8%) were at high risk for preterm SGA (≥ 1/100). In total, there were 140 (6.8%) cases of SGA, 61 (3.0%) of FGR, 44 (2.1%) of preterm SGA and 33 (1.6%) of early SGA. Among women with a false-positive high or intermediate risk for aneuploidy, the rates of SGA, FGR, preterm SGA and early SGA were 13.6% (26/191), 7.9 % (15/191), 6.8% (13/191) and 5.8% (11/191), respectively. Compared with women with a first-trimester low risk for preterm SGA, regardless of aneuploidy risk, those with a high risk for preterm SGA and a high or intermediate risk for aneuploidy had relative risks for SGA, FGR, preterm SGA and early SGA of 6 (95% CI, 3.9-9), 9.2 (95% CI, 5.1-16.5), 13.4 (95% CI, 6.9-26.1) and 17.6 (95% CI, 8.1-38.2), respectively. The predictive performance for SGA of the preterm SGA algorithm was higher in women at high or intermediate risk for aneuploidy than in the overall population (area under the ROC curve (AUC), 0.8 vs 0.7; P < 0.001). Among women at high or intermediate risk for aneuploidy, the predictive performance of the preterm SGA algorithm was better than that of the aneuploidy algorithm for SGA (AUC, 0.80 vs 0.58; P = 0.003), preterm SGA (AUC, 0.85 vs 0.65; P = 0.013) and early SGA (AUC, 0.86 vs 0.60; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In women with a first-trimester false-positive high or intermediate risk of aneuploidy, further screening for SGA allows stratification of the risk for fetal growth disorders. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Detection of growth-restricted fetuses during pregnancy is associated with fewer intrauterine deaths but increased adverse childhood outcomes: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

Exploring associations between antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and adverse outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational, register-based study.

SETTING

Zealand, Denmark.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Children born from 1 September 2012 to 31 August 2015.

METHODS

Diagnoses from birth until 1 January 2018 were retrieved from The National Patient Registry. Detection was defined as estimated fetal weight less than the 2.3rd centile. Cox regression was used to associate detection status with the hazard rate of adverse outcome, adjusted for fetal weight deviation, maternal age, ethnicity, body mass index and smoking.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adverse neonatal outcome, adverse neuropsychiatric outcome, respiratory disorders, endocrine disorders, gastrointestinal/urogenital disorders.

RESULTS

A total of 2425 FGR children were included. An association was found for gastrointestinal/urogenital disorders (hazard ratio [HR] 1.68, 95% CI 1.26-2.23, P < 0.001) and respiratory disorders (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.46, P = 0.03) in detected versus undetected infants. For adverse neuropsychiatric outcome, HR was 1.32 (95% CI 1.00-1.75, P = 0.05). There was no evidence of an association between detection and adverse neonatal outcome (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.62-1.61, P = 0.99) and endocrine disorders (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.88-2.19, P = 0.16). Detected infants were smaller (median -28% versus -25%, P < 0.0001), more often born preterm (odds ratio [OR] 4.15, 3.12-5.52, P < 0.0001) and more often born after induction or caesarean section (OR 5.19, 95% CI 4.13-6.51, P < 0.0001). Stillbirth risk was increased in undetected FGR fetuses (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.37-5.04, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association between detection of FGR and risk of adverse childhood conditions, possibly caused by prematurity. Iatrogenic prematurity may be inevitable in stillbirth prevention, but is accompanied by a risk of long-term childhood conditions.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Antenatal detection of growth-restricted fetuses is associated with adverse childhood outcomes but fewer intrauterine deaths.

Third-trimester uterine artery Doppler for prediction of adverse outcome in late small-for-gestational-age fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive ability for adverse perinatal outcome of abnormal third-trimester uterine artery Doppler in late small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify relevant observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating the performance of abnormal third-trimester uterine artery Doppler for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in suspected SGA fetuses and SGA neonates. Abnormal uterine artery Doppler was defined as uterine artery pulsatility index > 95^th percentile or ≥ 2 SD above the mean, or bilateral uterine artery notching. Hierarchical summary receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed using random-effects modeling. Bayesian analysis was used to calculate the posterior probability of adverse perinatal outcome following an abnormal or normal uterine artery Doppler assessment.

RESULTS

Seventeen observational studies (including 7552 fetuses either diagnosed with suspected SGA (n = 3461) or later diagnosed as a SGA neonate (n = 4091)) met the inclusion criteria; no randomized-controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Summary ROC curves showed that, among suspected SGA fetuses, the best predictive accuracy of abnormal third-trimester uterine artery Doppler was for perinatal mortality and the worst was for composite adverse perinatal outcome, with areas under the summary ROC curves of 0.90 and 0.66, respectively. The corresponding positive and negative likelihood ratios were 16.5 and 0.6 for perinatal mortality and 2.82 and 0.65 for composite adverse perinatal outcome, respectively. Following an abnormal vs normal uterine artery Doppler assessment, the posterior risks for composite adverse perinatal outcome, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, Cesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise, 5-min Apgar score < 7, neonatal acidosis and perinatal death were: 52.3% vs 20.2%, 48.6% vs 18.7%, 23.1% vs 15.2%, 3.59% vs 1.32%, 9.15% vs 5.12% and 31.4% vs 1.64%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal uterine artery Doppler in the third trimester appears to be moderately useful in predicting perinatal death in pregnancies with suspected SGA. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.