Routine first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia: pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A or placental growth factor?

Screening for pre-eclampsia using pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A or placental growth factor measurements in blood samples collected at 8-14 weeks' gestation

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in screening for preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) (delivery < 37 weeks' gestation) measured in maternal blood samples collected before 11 weeks, and to compare the screening performance of PAPP-A with that of placental growth factor (PlGF) from blood samples collected at 8-14 weeks.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from women who participated in the PRESIDE (Pre-eclampsia Screening in Denmark) study, a prospective, non-interventional multicenter study investigating the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester screening algorithm for PE in a Danish population. As part of combined first-trimester screening, a routine blood sample was collected at 8-14 weeks' gestation and PAPP-A was measured. Excess serum was stored at -80°C and analyzed for PlGF in batches after delivery. Most women in the PRESIDE study had an extra blood sample collected at the time of the first-trimester scan at 11-14 weeks, which was also analyzed for PlGF and PAPP-A in batches after all the participants had delivered. Screening performance was assessed in terms of the detection rate at a 10% screen-positive rate (SPR) for a combination of PAPP-A or PlGF with maternal factors alone and for a combination of each of these biomarkers with maternal factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI).

RESULTS

The study population comprised 8386 women who had a routine combined first-trimester aneuploidy screening blood sample collected at 8-14 weeks' gestation. In pregnancies that developed preterm PE, the median PAPP-A multiples of the median from routine blood samples were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.90) before 10 weeks, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.58-1.10) at 10 weeks and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.53-0.78) at 11-14 weeks. In women with samples collected before 10 weeks, there was no significant improvement in the detection rate of preterm PE when PAPP-A or PlGF was combined with maternal factors alone or when combined with maternal factors, MAP and UtA-PI. In routine samples collected at or after 10 weeks, PAPP-A only increased the detection rate of preterm PE slightly. However, PlGF in samples collected at or after 10 weeks increased the detection rate from 31.3% (95% CI, 16.1-50.0%) to 56.3% (95% CI, 37.7-73.6%) at a 10% SPR, i.e. an increase in the detection rate of 25.0% (95% CI, 4.3-44.4%), when combined with maternal factors alone. When PlGF collected from the PRESIDE sample at 11-14 weeks was combined with maternal factors, MAP and UtA-PI, there was an increase in the detection rate from 50.9% (95% CI, 37.1-64.6%) to 67.3% (95% CI, 53.3-79.3%), i.e. an increase of 16.4% (95% CI, 5.6-29.0%) at a 10% SPR.

CONCLUSIONS

PAPP-A has limited value in first-trimester screening for PE, whereas PlGF adds significantly to the detection rate of preterm PE at 10-14 weeks' gestation. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women at increased risk of preterm pre-eclampsia on first-trimester combined screening

OBJECTIVE

Uteroplacental dysfunction may not only result in pre-eclampsia (PE) but also in preterm birth (PTB), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth and stillbirth. The aim of this study is to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of first-trimester combined PE screening for all of these placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral maternity unit.

SAMPLE

A total of 13 211 singleton pregnancies.

METHODS

First-trimester combined screening for preterm PE using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), PTB, SGA birth and stillbirth were combined to assess composite adverse and severe adverse pregnancy outcomes (CAPO and CAPO-S). The PPVs for CAPO and CAPO-S were calculated for women with a combined risk for preterm PE of ≥1 in 50 and ≥1 in 100.

RESULTS

First-trimester combined screening identified 2215 women (16.8%) with a risk of ≥1 in 100 for preterm PE. The PPVs for a risk of ≥1 in 100 for CAPO and CAPO-S were 38.8% and 18.2%, respectively. The equivalent PPVs for a risk of ≥1 in 50 were 45.1% and 21.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Women identified at high risk of preterm PE are also at increased risk of other placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as PTB, SGA birth and stillbirth. Women at high risk for preterm PE after first-trimester screening may benefit from a higher surveillance care pathway, with interventions to mitigate all the adverse outcomes associated with placental dysfunction.

Routine first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening and maternal left ventricular geometry

OBJECTIVE

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy complication associated with premature cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality (i.e. before 60 years of age or in the first year postpartum). PE is associated with adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in the peri- and postpartum periods, an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to compare LV geometry by LV mass (LVM) and LVM index (LVMI) between participants with a high vs low screening risk for preterm PE in the first trimester.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks' gestation that underwent screening for preterm PE as part of their routine first-trimester ultrasound assessment at a tertiary center in London, UK, from February 2019 until March 2020. Screening for preterm PE was performed using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm. Participants with a screening risk of ≥ 1 in 50 for preterm PE were classified as high risk and those with a screening risk of ≤ 1 in 500 were classified as low risk. All participants underwent two-dimensional and M-mode transthoracic echocardiography.

RESULTS

A total of 128 participants in the first trimester of pregnancy were included in the analysis, with 57 (44.5%) participants screened as low risk and 71 (55.5%) participants as high risk for PE. The risk groups did not vary in maternal age and gestational age at assessment. Maternal body surface area and body mass index were significantly higher in the high-risk group (all P < 0.05). The high-risk participants were significantly more likely to be Afro-Caribbean, nulliparous and have a family history of hypertensive disease in pregnancy as well as other cardiovascular disease (all P < 0.05). In addition, mean arterial blood pressure (P < 0.001), mean heart rate (P < 0.001), median LVM (130.06 (interquartile range, 113.62-150.50) g vs 97.44 (81.68-114.16) g; P < 0.001) and mean LVMI (72.87 ± 12.2 g/m2 vs 57.54 ± 12.72 g/m2 ; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the high-risk group. Consequently, those in the high-risk group were more likely to have abnormal LV geometry (37.1% vs 7.0%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early echocardiographic assessment in participants at high risk of preterm PE may unmask clinically healthy individuals who are at increased risk for future cardiovascular disease. Adverse cardiac remodeling in the first trimester of pregnancy may be an indicator of decreased cardiovascular reserve and subsequent dysfunctional cardiovascular adaptation in pregnancy. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Maternal First-Trimester Alpha-Fetoprotein and Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications

BACKGROUND

Maternal serum markers used for trisomy 21 screening are associated with placenta-mediated complications. Recently, there has been a transition from the traditional first-trimester screening (FTS) that included PAPP-A (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A) and beta-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin), to the enhanced FTS test, which added first-trimester AFP (alpha-fetoprotein) and PlGF (placental growth factor). However, whether elevated first-trimester AFP has a similar association with placenta-mediated complications to that observed for elevated second-trimester AFP remains unclear. Our objective was to estimate the association of first-trimester AFP with placenta-mediated complications and compare it with the corresponding associations of second-trimester AFP and other first-trimester serum markers.

METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study of women who underwent trisomy 21 screening in Ontario, Canada (2013-2019). The association of first-trimester AFP with placenta-mediated complications was estimated and compared with that of the traditional serum markers. The primary outcome was a composite of stillbirth or preterm placental complications (preeclampsia, birthweight less than third centile, or placental abruption).

RESULTS

A total of 244 990 and 96 167 women underwent FTS and enhanced FTS test screening, respectively. All markers were associated with the primary outcome, but the association for elevated first-trimester AFP (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.57 [95% CI, 1.37-1.81]) was weaker than that observed for low PAPP-A (aRR, 2.48 [95% CI, 2.2-2.8]), low PlGF (aRR, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.97-2.64]), and elevated second-trimester AFP (aRR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.81-2.15]). When the models were adjusted for all 4 enhanced FTS test markers, elevated first-trimester AFP was no longer associated with the primary outcome (aRR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.58-1.02]).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike second-trimester AFP, elevated first-trimester AFP is not an independent risk factor for placenta-mediated complications.

Is mid-gestational uterine artery Doppler still useful in a setting with routine first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening? A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether routine mid-gestational uterine artery Doppler (UtAD) modifies the risk for preterm pre-eclampsia after first-trimester combined pre-eclampsia screening.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

London Tertiary Hospital.

POPULATION

A cohort of 7793 women with singleton pregnancies, first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm and UtAD pulsatility index (PI) assessment at the mid-gestation ultrasound.

METHODS

Pregnancies were divided into four groups: high risk in both trimesters (H1 H2 ), high risk in the first but not in the second trimester (H1 L2 ), low risk in the first but high risk in the second trimester (L1 H2 ) and low risk in both trimesters (L1 L2 ).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Small for gestational age (SGA), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and stillbirth.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 600 (7.7%) and 620 (7.9%) women were designated as being at high risk in the first and second trimesters, respectively. Preterm pre-eclampsia was more prevalent in the H1 L2 group (4.5%) than in women considered at low risk in the first trimester (0.4%, p < 0.0001). The prevalence of preterm pre-eclampsia in the L1 H2 group (3.3%) was significantly lower than that in women considered at high risk in the first trimester (7.0%, p = 0.0076), and was higher than that observed in the L1 L2 group (0.2%, p < 0.0001). The prevalence of SGA and term HDP followed similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-eclampsia risk after first-trimester FMF pre-eclampsia screening may be stratified through mid-gestational routine UtAD assessment. Pregnancy care should not be de-escalated for low mid-gestational UtAD resistance in women classified as being at high risk in the first trimester. The escalation of care may be justified in women at low risk but with high mid-gestational UtAD resistance.

Implementing Preeclampsia Screening in Switzerland (IPSISS): First Results from a Multicentre Registry

INTRODUCTION

The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) London developed a first trimester combined screening algorithm for preterm preeclampsia (pPE) that allows a significantly higher detection of pregnancies at risk compared to conventional screening by maternal risk factors only. The aim of this trial is to validate this screening model in the Swiss population in order to implement this screening into routine first trimester ultrasound and to prescribe low-dose aspirin 150 mg (LDA) in patients at risk for pPE. Therefore, a multicentre registry study collecting and screening pregnancy outcome data was initiated in 2020; these are the preliminary results.

METHODS

Between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021, we included all singleton pregnancies with pPE screening at the hospitals of Basel, Lucerne, and Bern. Multiple of medians of uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), placental growth factor (PlGF), and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) as well as risks were analysed as calculated by each centre's software and recalculated on the FMF online calculator for comparative reasons. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Version 9.1.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,027 patients with singleton pregnancies were included. 174 (16.9%) had a risk >1:100 at first trimester combined screening. Combining the background risk, MAP, UtA-PI, and PlGF only, the cut-off to obtain a screen positive rate (SPR) of 11% is ≥1:75. Outcomes were available for 968/1,027 (94.3%) of all patients; 951 resulted in live birth. Fifteen (1.58%) developed classical preeclampsia (PE), 23 (2.42%) developed PE according to the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) definition.

CONCLUSION

First trimester combined screening for PE and prevention with LDA results in a low prevalence of PE. The screening algorithm performs according to expectations; however, the cut-off of >1:100 results in a SPR above the accepted range and a cut-off of ≥1:75 should be considered for screening. More data are needed to evaluate, if these results are representative for the general Swiss population.

Pre-eclampsia screening in Denmark (PRESIDE): national validation study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) first-trimester screening algorithm for pre-eclampsia in a Danish population and compare screening performance with that of the current Danish strategy, which is based on maternal risk factors.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of women with a singleton pregnancy attending for their first-trimester ultrasound scan and screening for aneuploidies at six Danish university hospitals between May 2019 and December 2020. Prenatal data on maternal characteristics and medical history were recorded, and measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and serum placental growth factor (PlGF) were collected without performing a risk assessment for pre-eclampsia. Information on acetylsalicylic acid use was recorded. After delivery, pregnancy outcome, including gestational age at delivery and pre-eclampsia diagnosis, was recorded. Pre-eclampsia risk assessment for each woman was calculated blinded to outcome using the FMF screening algorithm following adjustment to the Danish population. Detection rates (DRs) of the FMF algorithm were calculated for a fixed screen-positive rate (SPR) of 10% and for the SPR achieved in the current Danish screening.

RESULTS

A total of 8783 pregnant women were included, with a median age of 30.8 (interquartile range (IQR), 28.1-33.9) years. The majority were white (95%), naturally conceiving (90%), non-smokers (97%) and had no family history of pre-eclampsia (96%). The median body mass index was 23.4 (IQR, 21.2-26.6) kg/m2 . A complete risk assessment including maternal characteristics, MAP, UtA-PI, PlGF and PAPP-A was available for 8156 women (92.9%). In these women, UtA-PI was measured bilaterally with a median value of 1.58 (IQR, 1.27-1.94) and the median resting MAP of 80.5 (IQR, 76.1-85.4) mmHg in two consecutive measurements. Among these, 303 (3.7%) developed pre-eclampsia, including 55 (0.7%) cases of pre-eclampsia with delivery < 37 weeks of gestation and 16 (0.2%) cases of pre-eclampsia with delivery < 34 weeks. At a SPR of 10%, combined screening using the FMF algorithm based on maternal characteristics, MAP, UtA-PI, PlGF and PAPP-A had a DR of 77.4% (95% CI, 57.6-97.2%) for pre-eclampsia with delivery < 34 weeks, 66.8% (95% CI, 54.4-79.1%) for pre-eclampsia with delivery < 37 weeks and 44.1% (95% CI, 38.5-49.7%) for pre-eclampsia with delivery at any gestational age. The current Danish screening strategy using maternal risk factors detected 25.0% of women with pre-eclampsia with delivery < 34 weeks and 19.6% of women with pre-eclampsia with delivery < 37 weeks at a SPR of 3.4%. When applying the FMF algorithm including maternal characteristics, MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF at the fixed SPR of 3.4%, the DRs were 60.5% (95% CI, 36.9-84.1%) for PE with delivery < 34 weeks and 45.2% (95% CI, 32.0-58.5%) for PE with delivery < 37 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In this large Danish multicenter study, the FMF algorithm based on maternal characteristics, MAP, UtA-PI, PlGF and PAPP-A predicted 77.4% of cases with pre-eclampsia with delivery < 34 weeks and 66.8% of cases with pre-eclampsia with delivery < 37 weeks of gestation at a SPR of 10%, suggesting that the performance of the algorithm in a Danish cohort matches that in other populations. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Biochemical Screening for Fetal Trisomy 21: Pathophysiology of Maternal Serum Markers and Involvement of the Placenta

It is now well established that maternal serum markers are often abnormal in fetal trisomy 21. Their determination is recommended for prenatal screening and pregnancy follow-up. However, mechanisms leading to abnormal maternal serum levels of such markers are still debated. Our objective was to help clinicians and scientists unravel the pathophysiology of these markers via a review of the main studies published in this field, both in vivo and in vitro, focusing on the six most widely used markers (hCG, its free subunit hCGβ, PAPP-A, AFP, uE3, and inhibin A) as well as cell-free feto-placental DNA. Analysis of the literature shows that mechanisms underlying each marker's regulation are multiple and not necessarily directly linked with the supernumerary chromosome 21. The crucial involvement of the placenta is also highlighted, which could be defective in one or several of its functions (turnover and apoptosis, endocrine production, and feto-maternal exchanges and transfer). These defects were neither constant nor specific for trisomy 21, and might be more or less pronounced, reflecting a high variability in placental immaturity and alteration. This explains why maternal serum markers can lack both specificity and sensitivity, and are thus restricted to screening.

Identification of miRNAs Involved in Foetal Growth Restriction Due to Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Smoking during pregnancy is associated with reduced foetal growth, amongst other effects. Epigenetic modification in the foetus and placenta during embryonic development as a result of changes in the function of miRNAs is one of the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for this. This dysregulation may be due to environmental changes or toxins such as tobacco.

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of smoking during pregnancy and its role in intrauterine growth restriction via hypermethylated miRNAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The differences in methylation patterns for miRNAs in umbilical cord blood from low-birth-weight newborns of smoking mothers were compared with those from normal-weight newborns using MedIP-seq (StarArray).

RESULTS

Seven hypermethylated miRNAs were identified in the epigenetic study of cord blood from low-birth-weight newborns of smoking mothers in our sample. The miRNAs found to be hypermethylated were: MIR7-1, MIR3918, MIR1244-1, MIR4721, MIR25, MIR93, MIR3656.

CONCLUSION

Intrauterine exposure to tobacco induces hypermethylation-mediated miRNA silencing in low-birth-weight newborns by modifying the expression of factors involved in vascular development, growth, and adaptation to hypoxia.

Routine first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening and risk of preterm birth

OBJECTIVES

Preterm birth (PTB) is a major public health problem worldwide. It can occur spontaneously or be medically indicated for obstetric complications, such as pre-eclampsia (PE) or fetal growth restriction. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether there is a shared uteroplacental etiology in the first trimester of pregnancy across PTB subtypes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies that underwent screening for preterm PE as part of their routine first-trimester ultrasound assessment at a tertiary center in London, UK, between March 2018 and December 2020. Screening for preterm PE was performed using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm, which includes maternal factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). Women with a risk of ≥ 1 in 50 for preterm PE were classified as high risk and offered prophylactic aspirin (150 mg once a day) and serial ultrasound assessments. The following delivery outcomes were evaluated: PTB < 37 weeks, iatrogenic PTB (iPTB) and spontaneous PTB (sPTB). Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of PTB, iPTB and sPTB with an increased risk of preterm PE. A model for prediction of PTB < 37 weeks and < 33 weeks was developed and its performance was compared with that of an existing model in the literature.

RESULTS

A total of 11 437 women were included in the study, of whom 475 (4.2%) had PTB. Of these, 308 (64.8%) were sPTB and 167 (35.2%) were iPTB. Patients with PTB had a higher body mass index, were more likely to be of black or Asian ethnicity, be smokers, have pregestational hypertension or diabetes, or have a history of previous PTB. They also had higher MAP (87.7 vs 86.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001), higher UtA-PI multiples of the median (MoM) (0.99 vs 0.92, P < 0.0001) and lower PAPP-A MoM (0.89 vs 1.08, P < 0.0001) compared to women with a term birth. In women at high risk of PE, the odds ratio for iPTB was 6.0 (95% CI, 4.29-8.43; P < 0.0001) and that for sPTB was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.46-2.86; P < 0.0001). A prediction model for PTB < 37 weeks and < 33 weeks, developed based on this cohort, included previous PTB, black ethnicity, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, PAPP-A MoM and UtA-PI MoM. The performance of the model was similar to that of an existing first-trimester prediction model for PTB < 33 weeks (area under the curve, 0.704 (95% CI, 0.653-0.754) vs 0.694 (95% CI, 0.643-0.746)).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased first-trimester risk for uteroplacental dysfunction was associated with both iPTB and sPTB, implying a shared etiological pathway. The same factors used to predict PE risk show acceptable discrimination to predict PTB at < 33 weeks. Women at high risk of uteroplacental dysfunction may warrant additional monitoring and management for an increased risk of sPTB. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Impact of replacing or adding pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A at 11-13 weeks on screening for preterm pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) alters or provides equivalent screening performance as placental growth factor (PlGF) when screening for preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) at 11-13 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a non-intervention screening study of 6546 singleton pregnancies that were screened prospectively for preterm PE in the first trimester between December 2016 and June 2018. Patient-specific risks for preterm PE were estimated by maternal history, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), PlGF and PAPP-A. A competing-risks model with biomarkers expressed as multiples of the median was used. All women and clinicians were blinded to the risk for preterm PE. The performance of screening for preterm PE using PlGF vs PAPP-A vs both PAPP-A and PlGF was assessed by comparing areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics (AUC) curves. McNemar's test was used to compare detection rate at a fixed false-positive rate (FPR) of 10%.

RESULTS

PlGF and PAPP-A were measured in 6546 women, of whom 37 developed preterm PE. The AUC and detection rate at 10% FPR using PlGF in combination with maternal history, MAP and UtA-PI were 0.854 and 59.46%, respectively. The respective values were 0.813 and 51.35% when replacing PlGF with PAPP-A and 0.855 and 59.46% when using both PAPP-A and PlGF. Statistically non-significant differences were noted in AUC when replacing PlGF with PAPP-A (ΔAUC, 0.04; P = 0.095) and when using both PAPP-A and PlGF (ΔAUC, 0.002; P = 0.423). However, on an individual case basis, screening using PlGF in conjunction with maternal history, MAP and UtA-PI identified three (8.1%) additional pregnancies that developed preterm PE and that were not identified when replacing PlGF with PAPP-A. Screening using PAPP-A in addition to maternal history and other biomarkers did not identify any additional pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

On an individual case basis, adoption of a screening strategy that uses PAPP-A instead of PlGF results in reduced detection of preterm PE, consistent with previous literature. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Reduction in Preterm Preeclampsia after Contingent First-Trimester Screening and Aspirin Prophylaxis in a Routine Care Setting

Objectives: Several multivariate algorithms for preeclampsia (PE) screening in the first trimester have been developed over the past few years. These models include maternal factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery Doppler (UtA-PI), and biochemical markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) or placental growth factor (PlGF)). Treatment with low-dose aspirin (LDA) has shown a reduction in the incidence of preterm PE in women with a high-risk assessment in the first trimester. An important barrier to the implementation of first-trimester screening is the cost of performing tests for biochemical markers in the whole population. Theoretical contingent strategies suggest that two-stage screening models could also achieve high detection rates for preterm PE with lower costs. However, no data derived from routine care settings are currently available. This study was conducted to validate and assess the performance of a first-trimester contingent screening process using PlGF for PE, with prophylactic LDA, for decreasing the incidence of preterm PE. Methods: This was a two-phase study. In phase one, a contingent screening model for PE was developed using a multivariate validated model and a historical cohort participating in a non-interventional PE screening study (n = 525). First-stage risk assessment included maternal factors, MAP, UtA-PI, and PAPP-A. Several cut-off levels were tested to determine the best screening performance, and three groups were then defined (high-, medium-, and low-risk groups). PlGF was determined in the medium-risk group to calculate the final risk. Phase two included a validation cohort of 847 singleton pregnancies prospectively undergoing first-trimester PE screening using this approach. Women at high risk of PE received prophylactic treatment with 150 mg of LDA. The clinical impact of the model was evaluated by comparing the incidence of early-onset (<34 weeks) and preterm (<37 weeks) PE between groups. Results: Cut-off levels for the contingent screening model were chosen in the first and second stages of screening to achieve a performance with sensitivities of 100% and 80% for early-onset and preterm PE detection, respectively, with a 15% false positive rate. In the development phase, 21.5% (n = 113) of the women had a medium risk of PE and required second-stage screening. In the prospective validation phase, 15.3% (n = 130) of the women required second-stage screening for PlGF, yielding an overall screen-positive rate of 14.9% (n = 126). The incidence of preterm PE was reduced by 68.4% (1.9% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.031) after one year of screening implementation. Conclusions: Implementation of contingent screening for PE using PlGF in a routine care setting led to a significant reduction (68.4%) in preterm PE, suggesting that contingent screening can achieve similar results to protocols using PlGF in the whole population. This could have financial benefits, with a similar reduction in the rate of preterm PE.

Serum PlGF compared with PAPP-A in first trimester screening for preterm pre-eclampsia: Adjusting for the effect of aspirin treatment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the predictive performance for preterm-pre-eclampsia (PE) in first-trimester screening by serum placental growth factor (PlGF) versus pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), in combination with maternal risk factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), after adjustment for the effect of aspirin in women receiving this treatment.

DESIGN

Non-intervention multicentre screening studies for PE in singleton pregnancies.

SETTING

Maternity hospitals.

POPULATION

Two independent prospective studies of 8775 and 16 451 women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine assessment at 11⁺⁰ -13⁺⁶ weeks' gestation.

METHODS

The competing risks model was used to estimate patient-specific risks of delivery with PE at <37 weeks' gestation based on maternal risk factors and combinations with MAP, UtA-PI and either PlGF or PAPP-A. McNemar's test was used to compare the detection rate (DR) of preterm-PE of screening utilising PlGF versus PAPP-A, after adjustments for the effects of aspirin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Predictive performance for preterm-PE.

RESULTS

In the combined data of 25 226 women, including 678 (2.7%) who developed PE, there were 194(0.8%) with preterm-PE. Addition of PlGF improved the DR of preterm-PE, at 10% screen positive rate, by 18.4% (95% CI 12.2-24.6) in screening by maternal risk factors, by 19.9% (95% CI 13.6-26.2) in screening by maternal factors and MAP, and by 7.0% (95% CI 2.3-11.6) in screening by maternal factors, MAP and UtA-PI. PAPP-A did not significantly improve the DR provided by any combination of biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

The predictive performance of first trimester PlGF for preterm-PE is superior to that of PAPP-A.

Effect of routine first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia on small-for-gestational-age birth: secondary interrupted time series analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a first-trimester combined screening program for pre-eclampsia, based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, on the rate of small-for-gestational age (SGA) at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of data obtained from a London tertiary hospital between January 2017 and March 2019. The data were derived from a secondary analysis of the cohort evaluated in a clinical-effectiveness study on the implementation of a first-trimester screening program for pre-eclampsia. The cohort included 7720 women screened according to the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) risk-based approach and 4841 women screened by the FMF multimodal approach, which combines maternal risk factors, blood pressure, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and uterine artery Doppler indices. The care package for the FMF-screened group included 150-mg aspirin prophylaxis, ultrasound scans at 28 and 36 weeks' gestation and scheduled delivery at 40 weeks. Outcome measures included the rates of SGA neonates at birth, admission to the neonatal unit, intrauterine demise, neonatal death and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy assessed by interrupted time series analysis (ITSA).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the rates of intrauterine demise, neonatal death and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy between the FMF-screened and NICE-screened cohorts. ITSA showed a significant reduction in the rate of term SGA birth < 10^th percentile at 21 months following implementation of the FMF screening program, with a relative effect reduction of 45.1% (P = 0.004). However, there was no significant relative effect reduction in term SGA birth < 5^th or < 3^rd percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

First-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia based on the FMF algorithm accompanied by a care package including serial ultrasound scans for growth evaluation and elective birth from 40 weeks' gestation resulted in a significant 45% relative effect reduction in term SGA birth < 10^th percentile but did not affect term SGA birth < 5^th or < 3^rd percentile. Further screening strategies to detect and improve the outcome of cases with SGA birth < 5^th percentile need to be considered. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVES

To validate prospectively transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the lower uterine segment (LUS) scar at the time of first-trimester screening in women with previous Cesarean section (CS) and to determine its feasibility and accuracy in stratifying women according to the risk for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder.

METHODS

Women with a history of CS were recruited between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks' gestation and underwent LUS scar assessment using transvaginal ultrasound. A standardized midsagittal plane, which included the cervicoisthmic canal (CIC), the uterine scar and the placental site, was obtained. The scar was described in terms of its size (narrow or dehiscent) and its location in relation to the CIC (within or above), with each LUS scar classified into one of four groups based on these features. Placental location was assessed and classified as high- or low-lying. Women were stratified according to the risk of PAS, based on the relationship between the scar location and placental site. Women were considered high risk when the scar was above the CIC and the placenta was low-lying (i.e. when the placenta was overlying an exposed scar) and low risk when the scar was within the CIC and/or the placenta was high. High-risk patients were followed up at 20 weeks and 28-30 weeks for the development of PAS. Maternal demographics, detailed obstetric history and obstetric outcome were collected.

RESULTS

First-trimester transvaginal ultrasound was offered to 535 women with prior CS during the study period. A LUS scar was visualized in 79.9% (401/502) of those who agreed to undergo the examination. At this scan, the LUS scar was above the CIC in 9.0% (36/401) of women, but only 5.7% (23/401) additionally had a low-lying placenta overlying the scar. Of these 23 high-risk women, two were found to have PAS on the mid-trimester screening scan and one was noted to have placental adherence during evacuation following mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. On the first-trimester scan, 94.3% (378/401) of women were at low risk of PAS. This screening protocol yielded a positive likelihood ratio of 21.33 (95% CI, 13.02-34.96), sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 29.24-100%), specificity of 95.31% (95% CI, 92.39-97.35%), positive predictive value of 16.7% (95% CI, 5.8-39.2%) and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 98.4-100%). On multivariable regression analysis performed to identify confounding variables associated with a LUS scar above the CIC, only maternal body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m² was significant (odds ratio (OR), 2.42 (95% CI, 1.04-5.39); P = 0.03). Although there was a trend towards an increased risk of a LUS scar above the CIC in women with prior elective prelabor CS (OR, 1.72 (95% CI, 0.80-3.68)), this association did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the location of the LUS scar and placenta at the time of first-trimester screening between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks' gestation in women with prior CS is a feasible and effective tool to identify those at risk of subsequent development of PAS disorder. A finding of placental implantation over an exposed LUS scar seems to be cardinal in predicting the risk of PAS disorder in women with prior CS, with an excellent negative predictive value. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.