Lysine 173 residue within the first exoloop of rat secretin receptor is involved in carboxylate moiety recognition of Asp 3 in secretin

Use of Cysteine Trapping to Map Spatial Approximations between Residues Contributing to the Helix N-capping Motif of Secretin and Distinct Residues within Each of the Extracellular Loops of Its Receptor

Amino-terminal regions of secretin-family peptides contain key determinants for biological activity and binding specificity, although the nature of interactions with receptors is unclear. A helix N-capping motif within this region has been postulated to directly contribute to agonist activity while also stabilizing formation of a helix extending toward the peptide carboxyl terminus and docking within the receptor amino terminus. We used cysteine trapping to systematically explore spatial approximations between cysteines replacing each residue in this motif of secretin (sec), Phe(6), Thr(7), and Leu(10), and cysteines incorporated into the extracellular face of the receptor. Each peptide was a full agonist for cAMP, but had a lower binding affinity than natural hormone. These bound to COS cells expressing 61 receptor constructs incorporating cysteines in every position along each extracellular loop (ECL) and adjacent parts of transmembrane (TM) segments. Patterns of covalent labeling were distinct for each probe, with Cys(6)-sec labeling multiple residues in the carboxyl-terminal half of ECL2 and throughout ECL3, Cys(7)-sec predominantly labeling only single residues in the carboxyl-terminal end of ECL2 and the amino-terminal end of ECL3, and Cys(10)-sec not efficiently labeling any of these residues. These spatial constraints were used to refine our model of secretin bound to its receptor, now bringing ECL3 above the amino terminus of the ligand and revealing possible charge-charge interactions between this part of secretin and receptor residues in TM5, TM6, ECL2, and ECL3, which can orient and stabilize the peptide-receptor complex. This was validated by testing predicted approximations by mutagenesis and residue-residue complementation studies.

The peptide agonist-binding site of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor based on site-directed mutagenesis and knowledge-based modelling

Mutagenesis and molecular pharmacological analysis of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor highlighted several residues involved in peptide agonist recognition. Coupled with a new molecular model of the full-length agonist-docked receptor, the binding site and a pharmacophore for agonist peptides are described.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–36)amide (GLP-1) plays a central role in regulating blood sugar levels and its receptor, GLP-1R, is a target for anti-diabetic agents such as the peptide agonist drugs exenatide and liraglutide. In order to understand the molecular nature of the peptide–receptor interaction, we used site-directed mutagenesis and pharmacological profiling to highlight nine sites as being important for peptide agonist binding and/or activation. Using a knowledge-based approach, we constructed a 3D model of agonist-bound GLP-1R, basing the conformation of the N-terminal region on that of the receptor-bound NMR structure of the related peptide pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating protein (PACAP21). The relative position of the extracellular to the transmembrane (TM) domain, as well as the molecular details of the agonist-binding site itself, were found to be different from the model that was published alongside the crystal structure of the TM domain of the glucagon receptor, but were nevertheless more compatible with published mutagenesis data. Furthermore, the NMR-determined structure of a high-potency cyclic conformationally-constrained 11-residue analogue of GLP-1 was also docked into the receptor-binding site. Despite having a different main chain conformation to that seen in the PACAP21 structure, four conserved residues (equivalent to His-7, Glu-9, Ser-14 and Asp-15 in GLP-1) could be structurally aligned and made similar interactions with the receptor as their equivalents in the GLP-1-docked model, suggesting the basis of a pharmacophore for GLP-1R peptide agonists. In this way, the model not only explains current mutagenesis and molecular pharmacological data but also provides a basis for further experimental design.

Structural and functional insights into the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail and extracellular loop regions of class B GPCRs

Class B guanine nucleotide-binding protein GPCRs share heptahelical topology and signalling via coupling with heterotrimeric G proteins typical of the entire superfamily of GPCRs. However, they also exhibit substantial structural differences from the more extensively studied class A GPCRs. Even their helical bundle region, most conserved across the superfamily, is predicted to differ from that of class A GPCRs. Much is now known about the conserved structure of the amino-terminal domain of class B GPCRs, coming from isolated NMR and crystal structures, but the orientation of that domain relative to the helical bundle is unknown, and even less is understood about the conformations of the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail or of the extracellular loops linking the transmembrane segments. We now review what is known about the structure and function of these regions of class B GPCRs. This comes from indirect analysis of structure-function relationships elucidated by mutagenesis and/or ligand modification and from the more direct analysis of spatial approximation coming from photoaffinity labelling and cysteine trapping studies. Also reviewed are the limited studies of structure of some of these regions. No dominant theme was recognized for the structures or functional roles of distinct regions of these juxtamembranous portions of the class B GPCRs. Therefore, it is likely that a variety of molecular strategies can be engaged for docking of agonist ligands and for initiation of conformational changes in these receptors that would be expected to converge to a common molecular mechanism for activation of intracellular signalling cascades.

Importance of each residue within secretin for receptor binding and biological activity

Secretin is a linear 27-residue peptide hormone that stimulates pancreatic and biliary ductular bicarbonate and water secretion by acting at its family B G protein-coupled receptor. While, like other family members, the carboxyl-terminal region of secretin is most important for high affinity binding and its amino-terminal region is most important for receptor selectivity and receptor activation, determinants for these activities are distributed throughout the entire length of this peptide. In this work, we have systematically investigated changing each residue within secretin to alanine and evaluating the impact on receptor binding and biological activity. The residues most critical for receptor binding were His1, Asp3, Gly4, Phe6, Thr7, Ser8, Leu10, Asp15, Leu19, and Leu23. The residues most critical for biological activity included His1, Gly4, Thr7, Ser8, Glu9, Leu10, Leu19, Leu22, and Leu23, with Asp3, Phe6, Ser11, Leu13, Asp15, Leu26, and Val27 also contributing. While the importance of residues in positions analogous to His1, Asp3, Phe6, Thr7, and Leu23 is conserved for several closely related members of this family, Leu19 is uniquely important for secretin. We, therefore, have further studied this residue by molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations. Indeed, the molecular dynamics simulations showed that mutation of Leu19 to alanine was destabilizing, with this effect greater than that observed for the analogous position in the other close family members. This could reflect reduced contact with the receptor or an increase in the solvent-accessible surface area of the hydrophobic residues in the carboxyl terminus of secretin as bound to its receptor.

Signaling mechanisms of secretin receptor

Secretin, a 27-amino acid gastrointestinal peptide, was initially discovered based on its activities in stimulating pancreatic juice. In the past 20 years, secretin was demonstrated to exhibit pleiotropic functions in many different tissues and more importantly, its role as a neuropeptide was substantiated. To carry out its activities in the central nervous system and in peripheral organs, secretin interacts specifically with one known receptor. Secretin receptor, a member of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor (GPCR) in the secretin/VIP/glucagon subfamily, possesses the characteristics of GPCR with seven conserved transmembrane domains, a relatively large amino-terminal extracellular domain and an intracellular carboxyl terminus. The structural features and signal transduction pathways of the secretin receptor in various tissues are reviewed in this article.

Location and nature of the residues important for ligand recognition in G-protein coupled receptors

The overall structure of the biogenic amine subclass of the G-protein-coupled receptors, and of their ligand binding sites, is discussed with the aim of highlighting the major structural features of these receptors that are responsible for ligand recognition. A comparison is made between biogenic amine receptors, peptide receptors of the rhodopsin class, and the secretin receptors which all have peptide ligands. The question of where the peptide ligands bind, whether at extracellular sites or within the transmembrane helix bundle, is discussed. The suitability of the rhodopsin crystal structure as a template for construction of homology models is discussed and it is concluded that there are many reasons why a caution should be issued against using it uncritically.

Identification of key amino acids in the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) responsible for high affinity binding of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP)

The bombesin (Bn) receptor family includes the gastrin-releasing peptide (GRPR) and neuromedin B (NMBR) receptors, Bn receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3) and Bn receptor subtype 4 (BB(4)). They share 50% homology, yet their affinities for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) differ. The determinants of GRP high affinity for GRPR and BB(4), and low affinity for BRS-3 are largely unknown. To address this question we made an analysis of structural homologies in Bn receptor members correlated with their affinities for GRP to develop criteria to identify amino acids important for GRP selectivity. Fourteen differences were identified and each was mutated singly in GRPR to that found in hBRS-3. Eleven mutants had a loss of GRP affinity. Furthermore, three of four amino acids in the GRPR selected used a similar approach and previously reported to be important for high affinity Bn binding, were important for GRP affinity. Some GRPR mutants containing combinations of these mutations had greater decreases in GRP affinity than any single mutation. Particularly important for GRP selectivity were K101, Q121, A198, P199, S293, R288, T297 in GRPR. These results were confirmed by making the reverse mutations in BRS-3 to make GRP gain of affinity mutants. Modeling studies demonstrated a number of the important amino acids had side-chains oriented inward and within 6A of the binding pocket. These results demonstrated this approach could identify amino acids needed for GRP affinity and complemented results from chimera/mutagenesis studies by identifying which differences in the extracellular domains of Bn receptors were important for GRP affinity.

Spatial approximation between the amino terminus of a peptide agonist and the top of the sixth transmembrane segment of the secretin receptor

Distinct spatial approximations between residues within the secretin pharmacophore and its receptor can provide important constraints for modeling this agonist-receptor complex. We previously used a series of probes incorporating photolabile residues into positions 6, 12, 13, 14, 18, 22, and 26 of the 27-residue peptide and demonstrated that each covalently labeled a site within the receptor amino terminus. Although supporting a critical role of this domain for ligand binding, it does not explain the molecular mechanism of receptor activation. Here, we developed probes having photolabile residues at the amino terminus of secretin to explore possible approximations with a different receptor domain. The first probe incorporated a photolabile p-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine into the position of His(1) of rat secretin ([Bpa(1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27). Because His(1) is critical for function, we also positioned a photolabile Bpa as an amino-terminal extension, in positions -1 (rat [Bpa(-1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27) and -2 (rat [Bpa(-2),Gly(-1),Tyr(10)]secretin-27). Each analog was shown to be a full agonist, stimulating cAMP accumulation in receptor-bearing Chinese hamster ovary-SecR cells in a concentration-dependent manner, with the position -2 probe being most potent. They bound specifically and saturably, although the position 1 analog had lowest affinity, and all were able to label the receptor efficiently. Sequential specific cleavage, purification, and sequencing demonstrated that the sites of covalent attachment for each probe were high within the sixth transmembrane segment. This suggests that secretin binding may exert tension between the receptor amino terminus and the transmembrane domain to elicit a conformational change effecting receptor activation.

Spatial approximation between two residues in the mid-region of secretin and the amino terminus of its receptor. Incorporation of seven sets of such constraints into a three-dimensional model of the agonist-bound secretin receptor

Photoaffinity labeling of receptors by bound agonists can provide important spatial constraints for molecular modeling of activated receptor complexes. Secretin is a 27-residue peptide hormone with a diffuse pharmacophoric domain that binds to the secretin receptor, a prototypic member of the Class B family of G protein-coupled receptors. In this work, we have developed, characterized, and applied two new photolabile probes for this receptor, with sites for covalent attachment in peptide positions 12 and 14, surrounding the previously most informative site of affinity labeling of this receptor. The [Tyr10,(BzBz)Lys12]rat secretin-27 probe covalently labeled receptor residue Val6, whereas the [Tyr10,(BzBz)Lys14]rat secretin-27 probe labeled receptor residue Pro38. When combined with previous photoaffinity labeling data, there are now seven independent sets of constraints distributed throughout the peptide and receptor amino-terminal domain that can be used together to generate a new molecular model of the ligand-occupied secretin receptor. The amino-terminal domain of this receptor presented a stable platform for peptide ligand interaction, with the amino terminus of the peptide hormone extended toward the transmembrane helix domain of the receptor. This provides clear insights into the molecular basis of natural ligand binding and supplies testable hypotheses regarding the molecular basis of activation of this receptor.

Mutational analysis of the glucagon receptor: similarities with the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP)/secretin receptors for recognition of the ligand's third residue

Receptor recognition by the Asp(3) residues of vasoactive intestinal peptide and secretin requires the presence of a lysine residue close to the second transmembrane helix (TM2)/first extracellular loop junction and an ionic bond with an arginine residue in TM2. We tested whether the glucagon Gln(3) residue recognizes the equivalent positions in its receptor. Our data revealed that the binding and functional properties of the wild-type glucagon receptor and the K188R mutant were not significantly different, whereas all agonists had markedly lower potencies and affinities at the I195K mutated receptor. In contrast, glucagon was less potent and the Asp(3)-, Asn(3)- and Glu(3)-glucagon mutants were more potent and efficient at the double-mutated K188R/I195K receptor. Furthermore, these alterations were selective for position 3 of glucagon, as shown by the functional properties of the mutant Glu(9)- and Lys(15)-glucagon. Our results suggest that although the Gln(3) residue of glucagon did not interact with the equivalent binding pocket as the Asp(3) residue of vasoactive intestinal peptide or secretin, the Asp(3)-glucagon analogue was able to interact with position 188 of the K188R/I195K glucagon receptor. Nevertheless, the Gln(3) side chain of glucagon probably binds very close to this region in the wild-type receptor.

Proline residue 280 in the second extracellular loop (EC2) of the VPAC2 receptor is essential for the receptor structure

Inspection of the amino acid sequence of the human VPAC1 and the VPAC2 receptors after alignment of the conserved residues indicates that the second extracellular loop (EC2) is one amino acid shorter in the VPAC1 receptor due to the lack of a proline residue in position 294. We hypothesized that this could be of importance for receptor structure and/or for ligand recognition. Insertion by directed mutagenesis of a proline in that position (<Pro>294 VPAC1) had little consequence on the binding of several agonists but reduced the affinity for the VPAC1 antagonist. Coupling of the <Pro>294 VPAC1 receptor to adenylate cyclase was improved, as demonstrated by an increased affinity for VIP and other agonists, and by a shift of the VPAC1 antagonist to partial agonist behavior. Deletion of the proline 280 (DeltaPro280 VPAC2) in the VPAC2 receptor markedly reduced the apparent affinity for all the agonists tested. Replacement of the proline by a glycine residue had a smaller effect on the ligands affinities. The proline residue in the VPAC2 receptor EC2 is thus essential for the receptor structure, and the EC2 domain is involved in ligand recognition and receptor functionality.

Mutational analysis of the human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor subtype VPAC(2): role of basic residues in the second transmembrane helix

1. We investigated the role of two conserved basic residues in the second transmembrane helix arginine 172 (R172) and lysine 179 (K179) of the VPAC(2) receptor. 2. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) activated VPAC(2) receptors with an EC(50) value of 7 nM, as compared to 150, 190 and 4000 nM at R172L, R172Q and K179Q-VPAC(2) receptors, respectively. It was inactive at K179I mutated VPAC(2) receptors. These results suggested that both basic residues were probably implicated in receptor recognition and activation. 3. The VPAC(2)-selective VIP analogue, [hexanoyl-His(1)]-VIP (C(6)-VIP), had a higher affinity and efficacy as compared to VIP at the mutated receptors. 4. VIP, Asn(3)-VIP and Gln(3)-VIP activated adenylate cyclase through R172Q receptors with EC(50) values of 190, 2 and 2 nM, respectively, and through R172L receptors with EC(50) values of 150, 12 and 8 nM, respectively. Asn(3)-VIP and Gln(3)-VIP behaved as partial agonists at the wild type receptor, with E(max) values (in per cent of VIP) of 75 and 52%, respectively. In contrast, they were more efficient than VIP (E(max) values of 150 and 150% at the R172Q VPAC(2) receptors, and of 400 and 360% at the R172L receptors, respectively). These results suggested that the receptor's R172 and the ligand's aspartate 3 are brought in close proximity in the active ligand-receptor complex. 5. The K179I and K179Q mutated receptors had a lower affinity than the wild-type receptors for all the agonists tested in this work: we were unable to identify the VIP amino acid(s) that interact with K179.

Two basic residues of the h-VPAC1 receptor second transmembrane helix are essential for ligand binding and signal transduction

We mutated the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) Asp(3) residue and two VPAC(1) receptor second transmembrane helix basic residues (Arg(188) and Lys(195)). VIP had a lower affinity for R188Q, R188L, K195Q, and K195I VPAC(1) receptors than for VPAC(1) receptors. [Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP had lower affinities than VIP for VPAC(1) receptors but higher affinities for the mutant receptors; the two basic amino acids facilitated the introduction of the negatively charged aspartate inside the transmembrane domain. The resulting interaction was necessary for receptor activation. 1/[Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP were partial agonists at VPAC(1) receptors; 2/VIP did not fully activate the K195Q, K195I, R188Q, and R188L VPAC(1) receptors; a VIP analogue ([Arg(16)] VIP) was more efficient than VIP at the four mutated receptors; and [Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP were more efficient than VIP at the R188Q and R188L VPAC(1) receptors; 3/the [Asp(3)] negative charge did not contribute to the recognition of the VIP(1) antagonist, [AcHis(1),D-Phe(2),Lys(15),Arg(16),Leu(27)] VIP ()/growth hormone releasing factor (8-27). This is the first demonstration that, to activate the VPAC(1) receptor, the Asp(3) side chain of VIP must penetrate within the transmembrane domain, in close proximity to two highly conserved basic amino acids from transmembrane 2.

Characterization of a novel VPAC(1) selective agonist and identification of the receptor domains implicated in the carboxyl-terminal peptide recognition

Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) interacts with a high affinity to two subclasses of G protein coupled receptors named VPAC(1) and VPAC(2), and has a 3 - 10 fold preference for VPAC(1) over VPAC(2) receptors. Selective ligands for each receptor subclass were recently described. [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) and [L(22)]-VIP are two selective VPAC(1) agonists. Chimaeric human VPAC(2)-VPAC(1) recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells were used to identify the receptor domains implicated in these two selective ligands recognition. The VPAC(2) preference for [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 27) over [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) did not require the receptor's NH(2)-terminus domain but involved the whole transmembrane domain. In contrast, the selectivity of [L(22)]-VIP depended only on the presence of the NH(2) terminus and EC(2) domains of the VPAC(1) receptor. The present data support the idea that in the GPCR-B family of receptors the different selective ligands require different domains for their selectivity, and that the peptides carboxyl terminal sequence (amino acids 24 - 27) folds back on the transmembrane receptor domain, close to the peptides, aminoterminus.

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptor chimeras identify domains responsible for the specificity of ligand binding and activation

In order to identify the receptor domains responsible for the VPAC1 selectivity of the VIP1 agonist, [Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (1-7)/GRF (8-27) and VIP1 antagonist, Ac His1 [D-Phe2, Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (3-7)/GRF (8-27), we evaluated their binding and functional properties on chimeric VPAC1/VPAC2 receptors. Our results suggest that the N-terminal extracellular domain is responsible for the selectivity of the VIP1 antagonist. Selective recognition of the VIP1 agonist was supported by a larger receptor area: in addition to the N-terminal domain, the first extracellular loop, as well as additional determinants in the distal part of the VPAC1 receptor were involved. Furthermore, these additional domains were critical for an efficient receptor activation, as replacement of EC1 in VPAC1 by its counter part in the VPAC2 receptor markedly reduced the maximal response.

Demonstration of a direct interaction between residue 22 in the carboxyl-terminal half of secretin and the amino-terminal tail of the secretin receptor using photoaffinity labeling

An understanding of the molecular basis of hormonal activation of receptors provides important insights for drug design. Toward this end, intrinsic photoaffinity labeling is a powerful tool to directly identify the ligand-binding domain. We have developed a new radioiodinatable agonist ligand of the secretin receptor that incorporates a photolabile p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine (Bpa) into the position of Leu22 and have utilized this to identify the adjacent receptor domain. The rat [Tyr10,Bpa22]secretin-27 probe was a fully efficacious agonist, with a potency to stimulate cAMP accumulation by Chinese hamster ovary SecR cells similar to that of natural secretin (EC50 = 68 +/- 22 pM analogue and 95 +/- 25 pM secretin). It bound specifically and with high affinity (Ki = 5.0 +/- 1.1 nM) and covalently labeled the Mr = 57,000-62,000 secretin receptor. Cyanogen bromide cleavage of the receptor yielded a major labeled fragment of apparent Mr = 19,000 that shifted to Mr = 9,000 after deglycosylation. This was most consistent with either of two glycosylated domains within the amino-terminal tail of the receptor. Immunoprecipitation with antibody directed to epitope tags incorporated into each of the candidate domains established that the fragment at the amino terminus of the receptor was the site of labeling. This was further localized to the amino-terminal 30 residues of the receptor by additional proteolysis of this fragment with endoproteinase Lys-C. This provides the first direct demonstration of a contact between a secretin-like agonist and its receptor and will contribute a useful constraint to the modeling of this interaction.

Role of charged amino acids conserved in the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide/secretin family of receptors on the secretin receptor functionality

The secretin receptor is a member of a large family of G-protein-coupled receptors that recognize polypeptide hormone and/or neuropeptides. Charged, conserved residues might play a key role in their function, either by interacting with the ligand or by stabilizing the receptor structure. Of the four charged amino acids that are conserved in the whole secretin receptor family, D49 and R83 (in the N-terminal domain) were probably important for the secretin receptor structure: replacement of D49 by H or R and of R83 by D severely reduced both the maximal response to secretin and its potency. No functional secretin receptor could be detected after replacement of R83 by L. Mutation of D49 to E, A, or N had no effect or reduced 5-fold the potency of secretin. The highly conserved positive charges found at the extracellular ends of TM III (K194) and IV (R255) were important for the secretin receptor function, as K194 mutation to A or Q and R255 mutation to Q or D decreased the secretin's affinity 15- to 1000-fold, respectively. Six extracellular charged residues are conserved in closely related receptors but not in the whole family. K121 (TM I) and R277 (TM V) were not important for functional secretin receptor expression. D174 (TM II) was necessary to stabilize the active receptor structure: the D174N mutant receptors were unable to stimulate normally the adenylate cyclase in response to secretin, and functional D174A receptors could not be found. Mutation of R255, E259 (second extracellular loop), and E351 (third extracellular loop) to uncharged residues reduced only 10- to 100-fold the secretin potency without changing its efficacy: these residues either stabilized the active receptor conformation or formed hydrogen rather than ionic bonds with secretin. Mutation of K121 (TM I) to Q or L and of R277 (TM V) to E or Q did not affect the receptor functional properties.

Contribution of the second transmembrane helix of the secretin receptor to the positioning of secretin

The secretin amino-terminal residues are essential for high affinity binding to its cognate receptor and for its biological activity. Mutation of the [Asp3] residue of secretin to [Asn3] decreased the ligand's affinity for the rat wild-type receptor 100-300-fold. Receptor mutations in the transmembrane 2 domain and the beginning of the first extracellular loop allowed the identification of three residues involved in recognition of the [Asp3] residue: D174, K173 and R166. Mutation of K173 and D174 not only reduced the secretin and [Asn3]secretin affinities, but also changed the receptor's selectivity as judged by a decreased secretin and [Asn3]secretin potency ratio. The most striking effect was observed when R166 was mutated to Q, D or L. This led to receptors with a very low affinity for secretin but an up to 10-fold higher affinity than the wild-type receptor for [Asn3]secretin. This suggested that R166, highly conserved in that subgroup of receptor, is a major determinant for the recognition of the [Asp3] of the ligand.

Multiple regions of ligand discrimination revealed by analysis of chimeric parathyroid hormone 2 (PTH2) and PTH/PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) receptors

PTH and PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) bind to the PTH/PTHrP receptor and stimulate cAMP accumulation with similar efficacy. Only PTH activates the PTH2 receptor. To examine the structural basis for this selectivity, we analyzed receptor chimeras in which the amino terminus and third extracellular domains of the two receptors were interchanged. All chimeric receptors bound radiolabeled PTH with high affinity. Transfer of the PTH2 receptor amino terminus to the PTH/PTHrP receptor eliminated high-affinity PTHrP binding and significantly decreased activation by PTHrP. A PTH/PTHrP receptor N terminus modified by deletion of the nonhomologous E2 domain transferred weak PTHrP interaction to the PTH2 receptor. Introduction of the PTH2 receptor third extracellular loop into the PTH/PTHrP receptor increased the EC50 for PTH and PTHrP, while preserving high-affinity PTH binding and eliminating high-affinity PTHrP binding. Similarly, transfer of the PTH/PTHrP receptor third extracellular loop preserved high-affinity PTH binding by the PTH2 receptor but decreased its activation. Return of Gln440 and Arg394, corresponding residues in the PTH/PTHrP and PTH2 receptor third extracellular loops, to the parent residue restored function of these receptors. Simultaneous interchange of wild-type amino termini and third extracellular loops eliminated agonist activation but not binding for both receptors. Function was restored by elimination of the E2 domain in the receptor with a PTH/PTHrP receptor N terminus and return of Gln440/Arg394 to the parent sequence in both receptors. These data suggest that the amino terminus and third extracellular loop of the PTH2 and PTH/PTHrP receptors interact similarly with PTH, and that both domains contribute to differential interaction with PTHrP.

Molecular cloning and in vitro properties of the recombinant rabbit secretin receptor

The rabbit secretion receptor cDNA was cloned from rabbit pancreas using combined polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/rapid amplification of cDNA ends (PCR/RACE) approaches. The rabbit cDNA encoded 445 amino acids and had 80 and 85% homology with rat- and human receptor, respectively, in terms of nucleic and amino acid sequences. Several regions where the rabbit receptor sequence diverged from the rat/human receptor sequences were observed in the putative extracellular domains of the receptor. A cDNA coding for a similar sequence with a 76 bp deletion after the 5th transmembrane domain was also found; it probably encoded an inactive protein. The whole rabbit secretin receptor cDNA was subcloned in expression vector pCR3.1, then stably and transiently transfected in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The pharmacological properties of the rat and rabbit secretin receptor studies were compared by radiolabeled secretin binding, binding inhibition, and adenylate cyclase activation (using secretin analogs and fragments). Porcine secretin was equipotent with rabbit secretin on the rabbit secretin receptor, but fivefold more potent than rabbit secretin on the rat receptor. This was due to the serine-->arginine residue replacement, in position 16 of rabbit secretin. Amino terminal modified secretin analogs (secretin (2-27), [E3]secretin, [N3]secretin) and VIP were less potent than secretin on both secretin receptors, but more potent on the rabbit than on the rat receptor. The carboxy-terminally truncated fragment (1-26) had the same reduced potency on rat and rabbit receptors. Thus, the rabbit secretin receptor had original properties, different from those of the rat receptor.

Mutational analysis of extracellular cysteine residues of rat secretin receptor shows that disulfide bridges are essential for receptor function

We attempted to express point-mutant secretin receptors where each of the 10 extracellular Cys residues was replaced by a Ser residue, in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Six of the point-mutant receptors (C24-->S, C44-->S, C53-->S, C67-->S, C85-->S and C101-->S) could not be detected by binding or functional studies: the mutations resulted in functional inactivation of the receptor. In contrast, the four other point-mutant receptors (C11-->S, C186-->S, C193-->S and C263-->S) were able to bind poorly 125I-secretin, and to activate adenylate cyclase with high secretin EC50 values. These results suggest that cysteine residues 24, 44, 53, 67, 85 and 101 are necessary for receptor function, and that the two putative disulfide bridges formed by cysteine residues 11, 186, 193 and 263 are functionally relevant, but not essential for receptor expression. Secretin activated the adenylate cyclase through the quadruple mutant (C11,186,193,263-->S), the four triple mutants, and through double mutants C186,193-->S and C186,263-->S with a very high (microM) EC50 value, suggesting that, in the wild-type receptor, disulfide bridges are formed between C11-C186, and between C193-C263. Prior treatment with dithiothreitol resulted in a marked EC50 increase of the wild-type receptor and of those receptors with at least the two cysteine residues in positions 11 and 186, suggesting that the C11-C186 (but not the C193-C263) disulfide bridge was accessible to this reducing agent. Several results nevertheless indicated that, in mutant receptors, alternative disulfide bridges can be formed between cysteine 186 and cysteine 193 or 263, suggesting that these three residues are in close spatial proximity in the wild-type receptor.