Induction of additional limb at the dorsal-ventral boundary of a chick embryo

Congenital Palmar Duplication of the Index Finger: Ventral Polydactyly With Ventral Dimelia

This report describes the case of a 10-month-old boy who presented with a duplicated index finger enveloped by palmar skin on the palmar side of the first web of the left hand. He was healthy without any other abnormalities except the hand anomaly. Surgical resection of the extra finger was performed with triangular flap at 15 months of age. The resected finger was composed of only palmar components: skin without nail or hair; flexor tendons; and digital nerves branching from the median nerve. Histological examination of the specimen demonstrated similar structures on both palmar and dorsal sides, that is, ridged, hairless, and glabrous skin with a high number of epithelial layers and thick corneous stratum and similar shaped tendons inserted into the symmetrical phalanx. This appears to be the first report in literature of an ectopic palmar index finger, a ventral polydactyly with ventral dimelia.

Conserved Mechanisms, Novel Anatomies: The Developmental Basis of Fin Evolution and the Origin of Limbs

The transformation of paired fins into tetrapod limbs is one of the most intensively scrutinized events in animal evolution. Early anatomical and embryological datasets identified distinctive morphological regions within the appendage and posed hypotheses about how the loss, gain, and transformation of these regions could explain the observed patterns of both extant and fossil appendage diversity. These hypotheses have been put to the test by our growing understanding of patterning mechanisms that regulate formation of the appendage axes, comparisons of gene expression data from an array of phylogenetically informative taxa, and increasingly sophisticated and elegant experiments leveraging the latest molecular approaches. Together, these data demonstrate the remarkable conservation of developmental mechanisms, even across phylogenetically and morphologically disparate taxa, as well as raising new questions about the way we view homology, evolutionary novelty, and the often non-linear connection between morphology and gene expression. In this review, we present historical hypotheses regarding paired fin evolution and limb origins, summarize key aspects of central appendage patterning mechanisms in model and non-model species, address how modern comparative developmental data interface with our understanding of appendage anatomy, and highlight new approaches that promise to provide new insight into these well-traveled questions.

Organ-Size Regulation in Mammals

The control of organism and organ size is a central question in biology. Despite the attention it has received, our understanding of how adult organ size is determined and maintained is still incomplete. Early work has shown that both autonomous and regulated mechanisms drive vertebrate organ growth, and both intrinsic and extrinsic cues contribute to organ size. The molecular nature of organ-size determinants has been the subject of intense study, and major pathways, which underlie cell interactions controlling cell compartment size, have been identified. In this work, we review these data as well as the future perspectives of research in this important area of study.

Molecular and evolutionary basis of limb field specification and limb initiation

Specification of limb field and initiation of limb development involve multiple steps, each of which is tightly regulated both spatially and temporally. Recent developmental analyses on various vertebrates have provided insights into the molecular mechanisms that specify limb field and have revealed several genetic interactions of signals involved in limb initiation processes. Furthermore, new approaches to the study of the developmental mechanisms of the lateral plate mesoderm of amphioxus and lamprey embryos have given us clues to understand the evolutionary scenarios that led to the acquisition of paired appendages during evolution. This review highlights such recent findings and discusses the mechanisms of limb field specification and limb bud initiation during development and evolution.

Bone morphogenetic protein signaling in limb outgrowth and patterning

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are multifunctional growth factors belonging to the transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) multigene family. Current evidence indicates that they may play different and even antagonistic roles at different stages of limb development. Refined studies of their function in these processes have been impeded in the mouse due to the early lethality of null mutants for several BMP ligands and their receptors. Recently, however, these questions have benefited from the very powerful Cre-loxP technology. In this review, I intend to summarize what has been learned from this conditional mutagenesis approach in the mouse limb, focusing on Bmp2, Bmp4 and Bmp7 while restricting my analysis to the initial phases of limb formation and patterning. Two major aspects are discussed, the role of BMPs in dorsal-ventral polarization of the limb bud, together with their relation to apical ectodermal ridge (AER) induction, and their role in controlling digit number and identity. Particular attention is paid to the methodology, its power and its limits.

Characterization of a novel ectodermal signaling center regulating Tbx2 and Shh in the vertebrate limb

Normal patterning of the developing limb requires a tight restriction of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) mRNA to the posterior margin of the limb bud. While several positive and negative regulatory factors have been identified which serve to position the Shh expression domain in the distal posterior limb, these factors cannot in themselves explain the tight restriction of Shh to the posterior margin, nor can they explain the similarly tight restriction of Shh to the anterior margin when the regulatory factors are disrupted or misexpressed. We suggest that the transcription factors Tbx2 and Tbx3 are excellent candidates for positively-acting factors responsible for limiting Shh expression to the margins of the limb bud. These closely related factors are indeed expressed at the anterior and posterior limb margins over a wide range of limb bud stages. Moreover, previous reports indicate that in addition, misexpression of Tbx2 beyond the limb margin is sufficient to anteriorly expand Shh, and conversely, antagonizing Tbx2 function leads to loss of Shh. In contrast to this idea, previous models have placed Tbx2 expression downstream of Shh and Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling. We find, however, that Tbx2 expression is neither affected by blocking Shh signaling with cyclopamine nor by genetic removal of several BMP activities in the limb bud. To understand the true source of the positional information responsible for limiting Tbx2, Tbx3 and Shh expression to the marginal mesenchyme of the limb bud, we undertook a series of grafting and extirpation experiments, which led to the identification of the dorsal-ventral (DV) border ectoderm exclusive of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) as a new signaling center in the limb bud. We find that maintenance of Tbx2 expression in the limb mesoderm requires proximity to the non-AER D-V border. Using chick-quail graft chimeras, we find that a graft of the non-AER D-V border ectoderm to a location on the surface of the middle of the limb bud is sufficient to induce ectopic expression of Tbx2 in underlying mesoderm. These data demonstrate that the non-AER D-V border ectoderm is necessary and sufficient for Tbx2 expression at the anterior and posterior limb margins. Similarly, we find that a graft of the non-AER D-V border can expand the domain of Shh anteriorly when grafted just anterior to the ZPA. It is notable that Tbx2 expression does not extend distally to the mesoderm underlying the AER. Moreover, we find that grafts of the AER to more proximal locations result in downregulation of Tbx2 expression, suggesting that the AER produces a negatively-acting signal opposing the activity of the non-AER DV border ectoderm. Indeed, implantation of beads soaked in fibroblast growth factor 8 (Fgf8), expressed in the AER, downregulates Tbx2 expression. The data presented here identify the non-AER border of dorsal-ventral ectoderm as a new signaling center in limb development that localizes the ZPA to the limb margin. This finding explains the tight restriction of Shh expression to the posterior margin throughout limb outgrowth as well as the tight restriction of Shh expression to the anterior margin in many mutants exhibiting preaxial polydactyly.

Wnts and wing: Wnt signaling in vertebrate limb development and musculoskeletal morphogenesis

In the past twenty years, secreted signaling molecules of the Wnt family have been found to play a central role in controlling embryonic development from hydra to human. In the developing vertebrate limb, Wnt signaling is required for limb bud initiation, early limb patterning (which is governed by several well-characterized signaling centers), and, finally, late limb morphogenesis events. Wnt ligands are unique, in that they can activate several different receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways. The most extensively studied Wnt pathway is the canonical Wnt pathway, which controls gene expression by stabilizing beta-catenin in regulating a diverse array of biological processes. Recently, more attention has been given to the noncanonical Wnt pathway, which is beta-catenin-independent. The noncanonical Wnt pathway signals through activating Ca(2+) flux, JNK activation, and both small and heterotrimeric G proteins, to induce changes in gene expression, cell adhesion, migration, and polarity. Abnormal Wnt signaling leads to developmental defects and human diseases affecting either tissue development or homeostasis. Further understanding of the biological function and signaling mechanism of Wnt signaling is essential for the development of novel preventive and therapeutic approaches of human diseases. This review provides a critical perspective on how Wnt signaling regulates different developmental processes. As Wnt signaling in tumor formation has been reviewed extensively elsewhere, this part is not included in the review of the clinical significance of Wnt signaling.

Boundaries in development: formation and function

Developing organisms may contain billions of cells destined to differentiate in numerous different ways. One strategy organisms use to simplify the orchestration of development is the separation of cell populations into distinct functional units. Our expanding knowledge of boundary formation and function in different systems is beginning to reveal general principles of this process. Fields of cells are subdivided by the interpretation of morphogen gradients, and these subdivisions are then maintained and refined by local cell-cell interactions. Sharp and stable separation between cell populations requires special mechanisms to keep cells segregated, which in many cases appear to involve the regulation of cell affinity. Once cell populations become distinct, specialized cells are often induced along the borders between them. These boundary cells can then influence the patterning of surrounding cells, which can result in progressively finer subdivisions of a tissue. Much has been learned about the signaling pathways that establish boundaries, but a key challenge for the future remains to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms that actually keep cell populations separated.

BMP controls proximodistal outgrowth, via induction of the apical ectodermal ridge, and dorsoventral patterning in the vertebrate limb

Dorsoventral (DV) patterning of the vertebrate limb requires the function of the transcription factor Engrailed 1 (EN1) in the ventral ectoderm. EN1 restricts, to the dorsal half of the limb, the expression of the two genes known to specify dorsal pattern. Limb growth along the proximodistal (PD) axis is controlled by the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), a specialized epithelium that forms at the distal junction between dorsal and ventral ectoderm. Using retroviral-mediated misexpression of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonist Noggin or an activated form of the BMP receptor in the chick limb, we demonstrate that BMP plays a key role in both DV patterning and AER induction. Thus, the DV and PD axes are linked by a common signal. Loss and gain of BMP function experiments show that BMP signaling is both necessary and sufficient to regulate EN1 expression, and consequently DV patterning. Our results also indicate that BMPs are required during induction of the AER. Manipulation of BMP signaling results in either disruptions in the endogenous AER, leading to absent or severely truncated limbs or the formation of ectopic AERs that can direct outgrowth. Moreover, BMP controls the expression of the MSX transcription factors, and our results suggest that MSX acts downstream of BMP in AER induction. We propose that the BMP signal bifurcates at the level of EN1 and MSX to mediate differentially DV patterning and AER induction, respectively.

Developmental regulation and asymmetric expression of the gene encoding Cx43 gap junctions in the mouse limb bud

The Gja1 gene encoding the gap junction connexin 43 (Cx43) is dynamically regulated during limb morphogenesis. Transcript expression is found in many regions of the limb bud known to be important in regulating limb growth and patterning. In the newly emerged limb bud, Gja1 transcripts are first expressed in the ventrodistal margin of the ectoderm, and later transcript expression is localized to the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). Interestingly, transcript expression in the ventrodistal ectoderm is initiated left/right asymmetrically, with some strain backgrounds showing reverse sidedness in the fore vs. hindlimb buds. In legless, a mouse mutant exhibiting both limb and left/right patterning defects, Gja1 transcripts could not be detected in this region. However, in the i.v./i.v. embryo, a mutant with randomization of body situs the same pattern of Gja1 asymmetry was found in the limb ectoderm regardless of body situs. This suggests that Gja1 transcript expression is not directly linked to signaling pathways involved in specification of the left/right axis. In addition to transcript expression in the apical ectodermal ridge, Gja1 transcripts were also found at high levels in the ventral ectoderm. In the limb bud mesenchyme, Gja1 transcripts were distributed in a posterior distal gradient, coincident with tissue known to have polarizing activity. With limb outgrowth and the initiation of limb mesenchyme condensation. Gja1 transcripts were localized in the presumptive progress zone, and in the condensing mesenchyme. In more proximal regions of the limb where mesenchyme differentiation has been initiated, Gja1 transcripts were expressed only in the outer mesenchymal cells comprising the presumptive perichondrium. Further analysis of transgenic mice ectopically expressing Wnt-1 in the limb mesenchyme revealed alterations in the pattern of Gja1 transcript expression in conjunction with the perturbation of limb mesenchyme condensation and differentiation. Together, these findings indicate that Cx43 gap junctions may mediate cell-cell interactions important in cell signaling processes involved in limb growth and patterning.

Fringe: defining borders by regulating the notch pathway

The Notch pathway mediates cell-cell interaction in many developmental processes. Multiple proteins regulate the Notch pathway, among these are the products of the fringe genes. The first fringe gene was identified in Drosophila, where it is involved in the formation of the dorsal/ventral border of the wing disc. It has now been found to be crucial for determining the dorsal/ventral border of the Drosophila eye. In vertebrates, fringe genes play roles in the formation of the apical ectodermal ridge, the dorsal/ventral border in the limb bud, and in the development of somitic borders. The roles of fringe in the neural tube or the eyes of vertebrate embryos are not clear, although it is unlikely that these roles are evolutionarily related to those in the same tissues in Drosophila. Genetic evidences suggest that Fringe protein functions by modulating the Notch signaling pathway, perhaps through differential regulation of Notch activation by different ligands; however, the mechanism underlying Fringe function remains to be investigated.

Molecular and cellular basis of pattern formation during vertebrate limb development

The body plan is generated by cells and tissues that become arranged precisely in the embryo. This process, termed pattern formation, involves cell interactions in which a particular group of cells produce signals that specify new cell types or patterns of differentiation in responding cells. These patterning signals emanate from very discrete centers called "organizer centers," such as the Hensen's node or Spemann organizer, the midbrain-hindbrain junction, the notochord, or in the case of the limb, the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) or the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). The developing vertebrate limb is an ideal model system for the study of pattern formation because, in addition to surgical manipulations, molecular manipulations are now feasible. In this review we summarize early experiments that established, by means of surgical manipulations, the different organizer centers of the vertebrate limb: the ectoderm covering the limb bud, the apical ectodermal ridge, the zone of polarizing activity, and the distal mesoderm (progress zone) underlying the AER. We then describe the domains of expression of various genes present during the development of the limb and discuss some of the functional approaches (overexpression and lack of function studies) undertaken to ascertain their role in limb outgrowth. The knowledge acquired in the last few years has had an enormous impact not only on our view of how limbs develop (perhaps now one of the most approachable vertebrate model systems) but also in a more general sense of how the embryo is organized in space and time.

Apical ectodermal ridge induction by the transplantation of En-1-overexpressing ectoderm in chick limb bud

In the early chick embryo, the dorsal ventral (DV) boundary organizes the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) structure in the limb bud field. Here it is reported that Engrailed-1 (En-1), a homolog of the Drosophila segment polarity gene engrailed expressed in the ventral limb ectoderm, participates in AER formation at the DV boundary of the limb bud. Restricted ectopic expression of En-1 in the dorsal side of the limb bud by transplantation of En-1-overexpressing ectoderm induces ectopic AER at the boundary of En-1-positive and -negative cells. The results suggest that En-1 is involved in AER formation at the DV boundary of the limb bud.

Coordinated expression of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 during limb muscle patterning

The limb muscle precursor cells migrate from the somites and congregate into the dorsal and ventral muscle masses in the limb bud. Complex muscle patterns are formed by successive splitting of the muscle masses and subsequent growth and differentiation in a region-specific manner. Hox genes, known as key regulator genes of cartilage pattern formation in the limb bud, were found to be expressed in the limb muscle precursor cells. We found that HOXA-11 protein was expressed in the premyoblasts in the limb bud, but not in the somitic cells or migrating premyogenic cells in the trunk at stage 18. By stage 24, HOXA-11 expression began to decrease from the posterior halves of the muscle masses. HOXA-13 was expressed strongly in the myoblasts of the posterior part in the dorsal/ventral muscle masses and weakly in a few myoblasts of the anterior part of the dorsal muscle mass. Transplantation of the lateral plate of the presumptive wing bud to the flank induced migration of premyoblasts from somites to the graft. Under these conditions, HOXA-11 expression was induced in the migrating premyoblasts in the ectopic limb buds. Application of retinoic acid at the anterior margin of the limb bud causes duplication of the autopodal cartilage and transformation of the radius to the ulna, and at the same time induces duplication of the muscle pattern along the anteroposterior axis. Under these conditions, HOXA-13 was also induced in the anterior region of the ventral muscles in the zeugopod. These results suggest that Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 expression in the migrating premyoblasts is under the control of the limb mesenchyme and the polarizing signal(s). In addition, these results indicate that these Hox genes are involved in muscle patterning in the limb buds.

Analysis of the genetic pathway leading to formation of ectopic apical ectodermal ridges in mouse Engrailed-1 mutant limbs

The apical ectodermal ridge (AER), a rim of thickened ectodermal cells at the interface between the dorsal and ventral domains of the limb bud, is required for limb outgrowth and patterning. We have previously shown that the limbs of En1 mutant mice display dorsal-ventral and proximal-distal abnormalities, the latter being reflected in the appearance of a broadened AER and formation of ectopic ventral digits. A detailed genetic analysis of wild-type, En1 and Wnt7a mutant limb buds during AER development has delineated a role for En1 in normal AER formation. Our studies support previous suggestions that AER maturation involves the compression of an early broad ventral domain of limb ectoderm into a narrow rim at the tip and further show that En1 plays a critical role in the compaction phase. Loss of En1 leads to a delay in the distal shift and stratification of cells in the ventral half of the AER. At later stages, this often leads to development of a secondary ventral AER, which can promote formation of an ectopic digit. The second AER forms at the juxtaposition of the ventral border of the broadened mutant AER and the distal border of an ectopic Lmx1b expression domain. Analysis of En1/Wnt7a double mutants demonstrates that the dorsalizing gene Wnt7a is required for the formation of the ectopic AERs in En1 mutants and for ectopic expression of Lmx1b in the ventral mesenchyme. We suggest a model whereby, in En1 mutants, ectopic ventral Wnt7a and/or Lmx1b expression leads to the transformation of ventral cells in the broadened AER to a more dorsal phenotype. This leads to induction of a second zone of compaction ventrally, which in some cases goes on to form an autonomous secondary AER.

Dorsal-ventral signaling in limb development

In both Drosophila wings and vertebrate limbs, signaling between dorsal and ventral cells establishes an organizer that promotes limb formation. Significant progress has been made recently towards characterizing the signaling interactions that occur at the dorsal-ventral limb border. Studies of chicks have indicated that, as in Drosophila, this signaling process requires the participation of Fringe. Studies of Drosophila have indicated that Fringe functions by inhibiting the ability of Notch to be activated by one ligand, Serrate, while potentiating the ability of Notch to be activated by another ligand, Delta. Recent studies of both Drosophila and vertebrates have also shed new light on the signaling activity of the dorsal-ventral boundary limb organizer, and have highlighted how this organizer is maintained by feedback mechanisms with neighboring cells.

Dorso-ventral ectodermal compartments and origin of apical ectodermal ridge in developing chick limb

We wish to understand how limbs are positioned with respect to the dorso-ventral axis of the body in vertebrate embryos, and how different regions of limb bud ectoderm, i.e. dorsal ectoderm, apical ridge and ventral ectoderm, originate. Signals from dorsal and ventral ectoderm control dorso-ventral patterning while the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) controls bud outgrowth and patterning along the proximo-distal axis. We show, using cell-fate tracers, the existence of two distinct ectodermal compartments, dorsal versus ventral, in both presumptive limb and flank of early chick embryos. This organisation of limb ectoderm is the first direct evidence, in vertebrates, of compartments in non-neural ectoderm. Since the apical ridge appears to be confined to this compartment boundary, this positions the limb. The mesoderm, unlike the ectoderm, does not contain two separate dorsal and ventral cell lineages, suggesting that dorsal and ventral ectoderm compartments may be important to ensure appropriate control of mesodermal cell fate. Surprisingly, we also show that cells which form the apical ridge are initially scattered in a wide region of early ectoderm and that both dorsal and ventral ectoderm cells contribute to the apical ridge, intermingling to some extent within it.

Expression of Radical fringe in limb-bud ectoderm regulates apical ectodermal ridge formation

The apical ectodermal ridge of the vertebrate limb bud lies at the junction of the dorsal and ventral ectoderm and directs patterning of the growing limb. Its formation is directed by the boundary between cells that do and cells that do not express the gene Radical fringe. This is similar to the establishment of the margin cells at the Drosophila wing dorsoventral border by fringe. Radical fringe expression in chick-limb dorsal ectoderm is established in part through repression by Engrailed-1 in the ventral ectoderm.