Effects of antiandrogens on chromatin remodeling and transcription of the integrated mouse mammary tumor virus promoter

Disruption of androgen receptor signaling in males by environmental chemicals

Androgen-disruptors are environmental chemicals in that interfere with the biosynthesis, metabolism or action of endogenous androgens resulting in a deflection from normal male developmental programming and reproductive tract growth and function. Since male sexual differentiation is entirely androgen-dependent, it is highly susceptible to androgen-disruptors. Animal models and epidemiological evidence link exposure to androgen disrupting chemicals with reduced sperm counts, increased infertility, testicular dysgenesis syndrome, and testicular and prostate cancers. Further, there appears to be increased sensitivity to these agents during critical developmental windows when male differentiation is at its peak. A variety of in vitro and in silico approaches have been used to identify broad classes of androgen disrupting molecules that include organochlorinated pesticides, industrial chemicals, and plasticizers with capacity to ligand the androgen receptor. The vast majority of these synthetic molecules act as anti-androgens. This review will highlight the evidence for androgen disrupting chemicals that act through interference with the androgen receptor, discussing specific compounds for which there is documented in vivo evidence for male reproductive tract perturbations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Endocrine disruptors'.

Expression profiling of nuclear receptors in the NCI60 cancer cell panel reveals receptor-drug and receptor-gene interactions

We profiled the expression of the 48 human nuclear receptors (NRs) by quantitative RT-PCR in 51 human cancer cell lines of the NCI60 collection derived from nine different tissues. NR mRNA expression accurately classified melanoma, colon, and renal cancers, whereas lung, breast, prostate, central nervous system, and leukemia cell lines exhibited heterogeneous receptor expression. Importantly, receptor mRNA levels faithfully predicted the growth-inhibitory qualities of receptor ligands in nonendocrine tumors. Correlation analysis using NR expression profiles and drug response information across the cell line panel uncovered a number of new potential receptor-drug interactions, suggesting that in these cases, individual receptor levels may predict response to chemotherapeutic interventions. Similarly, by cross-comparing receptor levels within our expression dataset and relating these profiles to existing microarray gene expression data, we defined interactions among receptors and between receptors and other genes that can now be mechanistically queried. This work supports the strategy of using NR expression profiling to classify various types of cancer, define NR-drug interactions and receptor-gene networks, predict cancer-drug sensitivity, and identify druggable targets that may be pharmacologically manipulated for potential therapeutic intervention.

Probasin promoter assembles into a strongly positioned nucleosome that permits androgen receptor binding

The promoter of the murine probasin (PB) gene exhibits strong androgen receptor (AR)-specific and tissue-specific regulation and is considered a promising candidate for gene therapy treatment of advanced prostate cancer. To characterize the determinants of chromatin specificity of the PB promoter with the AR we initially investigated the in vitro interactions of recombinant AR DNA binding domain (AR-DBD) with reconstituted nucleosomes incorporating the proximal PB promoter (nucleotides -268 to -76). We demonstrate that a DNA fragment of this promoter region exhibits strong nucleosome positioning. The phased DNA sequence protected by the histone octamer includes four androgen receptor response elements (AREs) which are arranged as two sets of class I and class II sites spaced approximately 90bp apart. Class I AREs form classical contacts with the AR, whereas class II AREs contain atypical binding sequences and have been shown to stabilize AR binding to adjacent class I sites, resulting in synergistic transcriptional activation and increased hormone sensitivity. We used DNase 1 footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to show that the AR-DBD binds to its cognate sequences independently of their nucleosomal organization. In addition, we show that the ability of the AR-DBD to interact with the nucleosomal PB promoter is not affected by histone acetylation. Thus the AR-DBD is able to bind to its cognate sequences within the PB promoter in a way that is indifferent to the presence or absence of histones and nucleosomal structure.

Environmental xenobiotics and nuclear receptors--interactions, effects and in vitro assessment

A group of intracellular nuclear receptors is a protein superfamily including arylhydrocarbon AhR, estrogen ER, androgen AR, thyroid TR and retinoid receptors RAR/RXR as well as molecules with unknown function known as orphan receptors. These proteins play an important role in a wide range of physiological as well as toxicological processes acting as transcription factors (ligand-dependent signalling macromolecules modulating expression of various genes in a positive or negative manner). A large number of environmental pollutants and other xenobiotics negatively affect signaling pathways, in which nuclear receptors are involved, and these modulations were related to important in vivo toxic effects such as immunosuppression, carcinogenesis, reproduction or developmental toxicity, and embryotoxicity. Presented review summarizes current knowledge on major nuclear receptors (AhR, ER, AR, RAR/RXR, TR) and their relationship to known in vivo toxic effects. Special attention is focused on priority organic environmental contaminants and experimental approaches for determination and studies of specific toxicity mechanisms.

Androgen receptor levels in prostate cancer epithelial and peritumoral stromal cells identify non-organ confined disease

BACKGROUND

Although up to 30% of men who undergo radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer will relapse with disseminated disease, currently it is not possible to predict these patients.

METHODS

Androgen receptor (AR) immunoreactivity in stromal and epithelial compartments of tumor foci was evaluated by video image analysis in 53 radical prostatectomy specimens. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression analyses were used to determine whether AR immunostaining was related to rate and risk of relapse, respectively.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight percent (52/53) of the tumors contained AR positive malignant epithelial cells. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with high AR levels (>64% AR positive nuclear area) in the malignant epithelial cells or low AR levels (<or=45% AR positive nuclear area) in the peritumoral stroma cells, were more likely to relapse earlier following radical prostatectomy. The shortest time to relapse and the highest relapse rate was for patients with both high AR in the malignant epithelial cells and low AR in the peritumoral stromal cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that AR is an important determinant of disease relapse in early stage prostate cancer, and that altered AR levels in the malignant epithelial cells or in the peritumoral stroma is indicative of non-organ confined prostate cancer.

Recruitment of beta-catenin by wild-type or mutant androgen receptors correlates with ligand-stimulated growth of prostate cancer cells

Prostate cancers respond to treatments that suppress androgen receptor (AR) function, with bicalutamide, flutamide, and cyproterone acetate (CPA) being AR antagonists in clinical use. As CPA has substantial agonist activity, it was examined to identify AR coactivator/corepressor interactions that may mediate androgen-stimulated prostate cancer growth. The CPA-liganded AR was coactivated by steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) but did not mediate N-C terminal interactions or recruit beta-catenin, indicating a nonagonist conformation. Nonetheless, CPA did not enhance AR interaction with nuclear receptor corepressor, whereas the AR antagonist RU486 (mifepristone) strongly stimulated AR-nuclear receptor corepressor binding. The role of coactivators was further assessed with a T877A AR mutation, found in LNCaP prostate cancer cells, which converts hydroxyflutamide (HF, the active flutamide metabolite) into an agonist that stimulates LNCaP cell growth. The HF and CPA-liganded T877A ARs were coactivated by SRC-1, but only the HF-liganded T877A AR was coactivated by beta-catenin. L-39, a novel AR antagonist that transcriptionally activates the T877A AR, but still inhibits LNCaP growth, similarly mediated recruitment of SRC-1 and not beta-catenin. In contrast, beta-catenin coactivated a bicalutamide-responsive mutant AR (W741C) isolated from a bicalutamide-stimulated LNCaP subline, further implicating beta-catenin recruitment in AR-stimulated growth. Androgen-stimulated prostate-specific antigen gene expression in LNCaP cells could be modulated by beta-catenin, and endogenous c-myc expression was repressed by dihydrotestosterone, but not CPA. These results indicate that interactions between AR and beta-catenin contribute to prostate cell growth in vivo, although specific growth promoting genes positively regulated by AR recruitment of beta-catenin remain to be identified.

Loss of androgen receptor transcriptional activity at the G(1)/S transition

Androgens are essential for the differentiation, growth, and maintenance of male-specific organs. The effects of androgens in cells are mediated by the androgen receptor (AR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors. Recently, transient transfection studies have shown that overexpression of cell cycle regulatory proteins affects the transcriptional activity of the AR. In this report, we characterize the transcriptional activity of endogenous AR through the cell cycle. We demonstrate that in G0, AR enhances transcription from an integrated steroid-responsive mouse mammary tumor virus promoter and also from an integrated androgen-specific probasin promoter. This activity is strongly reduced or abolished at the G(1)/S boundary. In S phase, the receptor regains activity, indicating that there is a transient regulatory event that inactivates the AR at the G(1)/S transition. This regulation is specific for the AR, since the related glucocorticoid receptor is transcriptionally active at the G(1)/S boundary. Not all of the effects of androgens are blocked, however, since androgens retain the ability to increase AR protein levels. The transcriptional inactivity of the AR at the G(1)/S junction coincides with a decrease in AR protein level, although activity can be partly rescued without an increase in receptor. Inhibition of histone deacetylases brings about this partial restoration of AR activity at the G(1)/S boundary, demonstrating the involvement of acetylation pathways in the cell cycle regulation of AR transcriptional activity. Finally, a model is proposed that explains the inactivity of the AR at the G(1)/S transition by integrating receptor levels, the action of cell cycle regulators, and the contribution of histone acetyltransferase-containing coactivators.

Human prostatic cell line PNT1A, a useful tool for studying androgen receptor transcriptional activity and its differential subnuclear localization in the presence of androgens and antiandrogens

The human immortalized prostatic cell line PNT1A has been proved to be a good model for analysis of cellular processes such as the prostatic epithelium proliferation in response to androgens and growth factors. Here we used this cell line for studying the transcriptional activity and trafficking of the androgen receptor (AR) by analyzing several actions of antiandrogens. Transient transfection experiments with PNT1A cells were performed with wild type human AR and an androgen-responsive gene reporter. We demonstrated that the transcription of reporter gene could be triggered by natural androgens (testosterone and dihydrotestosterone) in PNT1A cells as well as in the prostatic carcinoma cell line DU-145. With competitive experiments in the two cell lines, we observed no difference between the antagonistic capacity of cyproterone acetate (CPA) and hydroxyflutamide at 10(-7) M. At this concentration, bicalutamide antagonist activity was lower. In parallel, we compared the subcellular localization of the modified green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-AR in COS-7, PNT1A and DU-145 cell lines under fluorescence microscopy: we found different distributions between nucleus and cytoplasm, depending on the cell line and the culture medium. Androgen induced cluster formation within the nucleus of the PNT1A and DU-145 cells. However, the cytonuclear trafficking of androgen bound EGFP-AR in the same living cell and nuclear foci were easier to examine in the PNT1A cells. The antiandrogen capacity of bicalutamide was manifested by a slower androgen-dependent nuclear transfer of EGFP-AR and a homogeneous nuclear localization. A delayed advent of nuclear clusters was observed in presence of CPA. We conclude that the PNT1A cell line is a better model than the DU-145 cell line to analyze the trafficking of AR and the association of AR on the nuclear matrix, as well as to observe the action of antiandrogens on these critical steps in prostate cells.