Botulinum A toxin therapy: neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies--therapeutic consequences

Five decades of the use of botulinum toxin in ophthalmology

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been known for over 50 years. It has conquered many areas of medicine and has become indispensable in contemporary medicine. Now, BoNT is used to treat at least 26 conditions in six medical specialties. Although the use of BoNT began in strabology, it became the gold standard for many ophthalmologic pathologies. The present review of the literature focuses on the use of BoNT in ophthalmology and treatment of the following conditions: blepharospasm, facial hemispasm, facial palsy, spastic entropion, strabismus, endocrine orbitopathy, convergence spasm, and facial trauma. We conclude that nearly half a century of experience in utilizing BoNT in ophthalmology ensured a satisfactory level of effectiveness and safety for patients with many pathologies. Areas of future research include the application of BoNT in new selected indications, the development of the route of application without injections, and the development of long-acting BoNT forms for patients who require repeated long-term treatment.

The role of botulinum neurotoxin BoNT-A in the management of oily skin and acne vulgaris: A comprehensive review

Oily skin and acne vulgaris are prevalent dermatological conditions with a significant impact on both physical and emotional well-being. Despite numerous available treatments, there is a pressing need for effective, long-term solutions. Botulinum Neurotoxin (BoNT-A) has emerged as a potential therapeutic option. However, existing reviews in this area are often limited. This review aims to comprehensively assess the use of BoNT-A in managing oily skin and acne vulgaris while addressing gaps in previous publications. It integrates the latest research, clinical trials, and case studies to provide an up-to-date analysis of BoNT-A mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes. The review systematically analyzes existing evidence, critically evaluates study strengths and limitations, and explores potential synergies with other treatments. It also examines the safety profile of BoNT-A and its potential long-term effects. This review uncovers promising insights into how BoNT-A affects oily skin and acne vulgaris, including its ability to regulate sebum production, reduce inflammation, and potentially shrink pore size. It provides a comprehensive overview of relevant studies and clinical trials, detailing their methodologies, protocols, measures, and results. Collectively, these studies show significant reductions in sebum production, increased patient satisfaction, and smaller pores following BoNT-A treatment. In conclusion, this review addresses knowledge gaps and provides a comprehensive analysis of BoNT-A as a therapeutic option for oily skin and acne vulgaris. By consolidating evidence and highlighting areas for further investigation, it guides clinicians and researchers toward more effective, personalized treatments for individuals with these dermatological challenges.

Clinical Immunogenicity of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Glabellar Lines: Pooled Data from the SAKURA Phase 3 Trials

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A product containing daxibotulinumtoxinA with a stabilizing excipient peptide (RTP004). DAXI immunogenicity was assessed in three phase 3 glabellar line studies (two placebo-controlled, single-dose studies and an open-label repeat-dose safety study). Binding antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA and RTP004 were detected by validated ELISAs. Samples positive for daxibotulinumtoxinA-binding antibodies were evaluated further for titer and neutralizing antibodies by mouse protection assay. Overall, 2786 subjects received DAXI and 2823 subjects were exposed to RTP004 as DAXI (n = 2786) or placebo (n = 37). Treatment-related anti-daxibotulinumtoxinA binding antibodies were detected in 21 of 2737 evaluable subjects (0.8%). No subject developed neutralizing antibodies. Treatment-related anti-RTP004 binding antibodies were detected in 35 (1.3%) of 2772 evaluable subjects. Binding antibodies were generally transient, of low titer (<1:200), and no subject had binding antibodies to both daxibotulinumtoxinA and RTP004. All subjects with treatment-induced binding antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA or RTP004 achieved none or mild glabellar line severity at Week 4 following each DAXI cycle, indicating no impact on DAXI efficacy. No subjects with binding antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA or RTP004 reported immune-related adverse events. This evaluation of anti-drug antibody formation with DAXI shows low rates of antibody formation to both daxibotulinumtoxinA and RTP004.

Botulinum toxin antibody titres: measurement, interpretation, and practical recommendations

Botulinum toxin (BT) therapy may be blocked by antibodies (BT-AB) resulting in BT-AB induced therapy failure (ABF). BT-AB may be detected by the mouse lethality assay (MLA), the mouse diaphragm assay (MDA) and the sternocleidomastoid test (SCMT). For the first time, we wanted to compare all three BT-AB tests and correlate them to subjective complaint of complete or partial secondary therapy failure in 37 patients with cervical dystonia (25 females, 12 males, age 51.2 ± 11.4 years, disease duration 12.4 ± 6.3 years). Complaint of therapy failure was not correlated with any of the BT-AB tests. MDA and MLA are closely correlated, indicating that the MDA might replace the MLA as the current gold standard for BT-AB measurement. The SCMT is closely correlated with MDA and MLA confirming that BT-AB titres and BT's paretic effect are in a functional balance: low BT-AB titres are reducing BT's paretic effect only marginally, whereas high BT-AB titres may completely block it. When therapy failure is classified as secondary and permanent, BT-AB evaluation is recommended and any BT-AB test may be applied. For MDA > 10 mU/ml, MLA > 3 and SCMT < 25%, ABF is highly likely. MDA < 0.6 mU/ml are therapeutically irrelevant. They are neither correlated with pathologic MLA nor with pathologic SCMT. They should not be the basis for treatment decisions, such as switching dystonia therapy to deep brain stimulation. All other results are intermediate results. Their interactions with therapy efficacy is unpredictable. In these cases, BT-AB tests should be repeated or one or two additional test methods should be applied.

The Immunology of Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Brief Summary

Like all proteins foreign to the human body, also botulinum toxin (BT) is antigenic and may stimulate an immune response with formulation of antibodies (BT-AB). Affected patients may no longer respond to BT therapy and various degrees of BT-AB related therapy failure (ABF) may result. We want to review the immunological interactions between BT and BT-AB, the prevalence, the time course and the risk factors for BT-AB formation as they are related to the treatment algorithms, the patient's immune system and to exogenic factors. Special emphasis is placed on various features of the BT drugs including the specific biological activity (SBA) as a predictor of their antigenicity. Quantitative detection of BT-AB by the mouse diaphragm assay will be demonstrated. As ABF may have serious consequences for patients affected, careful risk factor analysis is warranted to reduce them wherever possible.

Emerging Trends in Botulinum Neurotoxin A Resistance: An International Multidisciplinary Review and Consensus

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection is the most widely performed aesthetic procedure and a first-line therapeutic option for various medical conditions. The potential for BoNT-A immunoresistance and secondary nonresponse related to neutralizing antibody (NAb) formation warrants attention as the range of BoNT-A aesthetic applications continues to expand.

Methods

An international multidisciplinary panel reviewed published evidence on BoNT-A immunoresistance in aesthetic and therapeutic applications and discussed best practices integrating clinical, ethical, and aesthetic considerations. Consensus statements relating to awareness, assessment, and management of the risk of NAb-related secondary nonresponse in aesthetic practice were developed.

Results

There was a consensus that, as doses used in aesthetic practice become like those in therapeutics, rates of NAb formation may be expected to increase. However, the true extent of NAb formation in aesthetics is likely underestimated due to limitations of published evidence and variability in treatment patterns of aesthetic patients. Since BoNT-A therapy is often lifelong, practitioners need to recognize immunogenicity as a potential complication that might affect future therapeutic use and strive to minimize modifiable risk factors. The selection and use of a BoNT-A product with the least immunogenic potential from the beginning may thus be advantageous, especially when treatment with high doses is planned.

Conclusions

In view of current trends in BoNT-A aesthetic use, it is essential for practitioners to conduct thorough clinical assessments, inform patients of treatment risks, and develop BoNT-A treatment plans to minimize immunogenicity. This can help preserve the option of continued or future BoNT-A treatment with satisfactory outcomes.

Immunogenicity Associated with Aesthetic Botulinumtoxin A: A Survey of Asia-Pacific Physicians' Experiences and Recommendations

Background:

Most botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) products contain unnecessary bacterial components that increase the risk of developing neutralizing antibodies (nAbs). Reports of secondary nonresponse and treatment failures (STF) due to nAbs have accompanied a surge in new BoNT/A products.

Methods:

To formulate recommendations on managing toxin resistance, we reviewed the evidence on BoNT/A-associated immunogenicity and evaluated Asian physicians' current BoNT/A practices, knowledge, and real-world experiences, as provided by survey outcomes conducted with 128 Asian experts (regular botulinum toxin injectors).

Results:

Most doctors believe STF occurs, some patients exhibit partial symptoms, and impurities (eg, complexing proteins) in BoNT/A preparations risk STF. Bioassays that distinguish non-nAbs from nAbs that hinder toxin function remain unavailable to most doctors, though most would perform testing if given the option. Doctors in the Asia-Pacific region have differing strategies for managing STF, depending on the availability of alternatives or tests. They recommended switching to a highly-purified formulation free of complexing proteins and other impurities to lower the risk of immunogenicity, or offering treatment holidays of 2 -2.5 years. They suggested restarting treatment with the same highly purified formulation, especially for repeated treatments, large-dose injections, and younger patients who will accumulate higher lifetime doses, so as to minimize immunogenic risks and preserve long-term treatment outcomes. Importantly, doctors should always initiate patients on pure formulations rather than switching to these only after resistance develops.

Conclusion:

Choosing highly purified BoNT/A products at treatment initiation enhances long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction while minimizing the risk of immune activation and nAb formation.

Immunogenicity of botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxin treatment is the most common non-surgical cosmetic treatment. Although there are many available treatments using botulinum toxin, their effects are temporary and repeated injections are required. These frequent injections can trigger an immunological response. In addition, botulinum toxin acts as an antigen in the body; thus, its effect disappears progressively due to this immunological reaction, which may cause treatment failure. Active botulinum toxin consists of a core neurotoxin and complexing proteins, the exact effects of which remain unclear. However, the complexing proteins are closely related to the immune response and the formation of neutralizing antibodies. Since neutralizing antibodies can lead to treatment failure, their formation should be prevented. Furthermore, various methods of detecting neutralizing antibodies have been used to predict treatment failure.

Significant Long-Lasting Improvement after Switch to Incobotulinum Toxin in Cervical Dystonia Patients with Secondary Treatment Failure

Under continuous long-term treatment with abo- or onabotulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A), ~10 to 15% of patients with cervical dystonia (CD) will develop neutralizing antibodies and reduced responsiveness over an ~10-year treatment period. Among the botulinum neurotoxin type A preparations so far licensed for CD, incobotulinum toxin A (incoBoNT/A; Xeomin^®) is the only one without complex proteins. Whether CD patients with treatment failure under abo- or onaBoNT/A may still respond to incoBoNT/A is unknown. In this cross-sectional, retrospective study, 64 CD patients with secondary treatment failure after abo- or onaBoNT/A therapy who were switched to incoBoNT/A were compared to 34 CD patients exclusively treated with incoBoNT/A. The initial clinical severity of CD, best outcome during abo- or onaBoNT/A therapy, severity at the time of switching to incoBoNT/A and severity at recruitment, as well as all corresponding doses, were analyzed. Furthermore, the impact of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) on the long-term outcome of incoBoNT/A therapy was evaluated. Patients significantly improved after the switch to incoBoNT/A (p < 0.001) but did not reach the improvement level obtained before the development of partial secondary treatment failure or that of patients who were exclusively treated with incoBoNT/A. No difference between abo- and onaBoNT/A pretreatments or between the long-term outcomes of NAB-positive and NAB-negative patients was found. The present study demonstrates significant long-term improvement after a switch to incoBoNT/A in patients with preceding secondary treatment failure after abo- or onaBoNT/A therapy and confirms the low antigenicity of incoBoNT/A.

Safety and efficacy of repeat long-term incobotulinumtoxinA treatment for lower limb or combined upper/lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy

PURPOSE

The open-label phase 3 "Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA in Movement Open-Label" (TIMO) study investigated longer-term safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxin A in children/adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).

METHODS

Patients on standard treatment, with unilateral or bilateral lower limb (LL) or combined upper limb (UL)/LL spasticity received four incobotulinumtoxinA injection cycles (16 or 20 Units/kg bodyweight total [maximum 400 or 500 Units] per cycle depending on ambulatory status/clinical pattern treated), each followed by 12-16 weeks' observation. Treatment for pes equinus was mandatory; flexed knee or adducted thigh were options for unilateral treatment and/or ULs for unilateral/bilateral treatment. The primary endpoint was safety; changes in Ashworth Scale and Gross Motor Function Measure-66 scores, and Global Impression of Change Scale scores at week 4 of each injection cycle were also evaluated.

RESULTS

IncobotulinumtoxinA (≤500 Units for ≤98 weeks) was safe, well-tolerated, and effective across all endpoints for multipattern treatment of LL and combined LL/UL spasticity in ambulant/nonambulant children/adolescents with CP. Treatment effects increased with each injection cycle. No new/unexpected safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSION

IncobotulinumtoxinA showed a good safety and tolerability profile, with efficacy over multiple clinical presentations. As an adjunct treatment, it offers an effective, individualized treatment option for pediatric CP-related spasticity.

Antibody Development in Patients Treated Long-Term With OnabotulinumtoxinA for Benign Essential Blepharospasm and Hemifacial Spasm

BACKGROUND

Report the development of onabotulinumtoxinA neutralizing antibodies in patients treated consecutively for 20 years or longer for benign essential blepharospasm (BEB), hemifacial spasm (HFS), and Meige Syndrome.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, cross-sectional study of 12 randomly selected patients from a single clinical practice that have been treated consecutively for 20 or more years with onabotulinumtoxinA for BEB, HFS, or Meige Syndrome. Serum samples were collected from each subject and analyzed for neutralizing antibody formation using the Mouse Protection Assay.

RESULTS

None of the tested patients (0%) displayed neutralizing antibodies to onabotulinumtoxinA. The mean duration of treatment was 27.5 years (range 22.1-34.1, SD 3.1, 95% confidence interval 25.45-29.50). Nine of the patients had a diagnosis of BEB, 2 HFS, and one Meige. Eleven of the 12 patients were women. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment dosage or interval over the course of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support previous studies showing low incidence of antibody formation for botulinum A toxins with this subset of long-term treated patients. The results also provide further evidence for studies that have suggested increased onabotulinumtoxinA treatment volumes and/or decreased intervals between treatments are not due to neutralizing antibody formation and secondary non-response, but rather study designs that do not consider the titration phase of initial treatments. This study is specific to long-term treated patients, and the results cannot be generalized to patients naive to treatment.

Clinical Improvement After Treatment With IncobotulinumtoxinA (XEOMIN®) in Patients With Cervical Dystonia Resistant to Botulinum Toxin Preparations Containing Complexing Proteins

This study investigated the clinical long-term effect of incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBoNT/A) in 33 cervical dystonia (CD) patients who had developed partial secondary therapy failure (PSTF) under previous long-term botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatment. Patients were treated four times every 12 weeks with incoBoNT/A injections. Physicians assessed treatment efficacy using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) at the baseline visit, week 12 and 48. Patients rated quality of life of CD with the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24). Titres of neutralizing antibodies(NAB) were determined at start of the study and after 48 weeks. All patients had experienced significant and progressive worsening of symptoms in the last 6 months of previous BoNT treatment. Repeated incoBoNT/A injections resulted in a significant reduction in mean TWSTRS at week 12 and 48. Patients' rating of quality of life was highly correlated with TWSTRS but did not change significantly over 48 weeks. During the 48 weeks -period of incoBoNT/A treatment NAB titres decreased in 32.2%, did not change in 45.2%, and only increased in 22.6% of the patients. Thus, repeated treatment with the low dose of 200 MU incoBoNT/A over 48 weeks provided a beneficial clinical long-term effect in PSTF and did not booster titres of NAB.

Botulinum Toxin A: A Review of Potential Uses in Treatment of Female Urogenital and Pelvic Floor Disorders

Background: Botulinum toxin is an injectable neuromodulator that inhibits transmission between peripheral nerve endings and muscle fibers, resulting in muscle paralysis. Botulinum toxin type A is the most common form of botulinum toxin used in clinical practice.

Methods: In this review, we examine the mechanism of action, formulations, common clinical use in the genital-urinary tract, and potential clinical use in pelvic floor disorders of botulinum toxin type A.

Results: Several aspects of botulinum toxin A make it a favorable therapeutic tool, including its accessibility, its longevity, and its impermanence and reversibility of resultant chemodenervation in a relatively short and safe manner. Although botulinum toxin A has well-established efficacy in treating refractory overactive bladder and neurogenic detrusor overactivity, its use in pelvic floor disorders is still in its infancy.

Conclusion: The efficacy of botulinum toxin A for treating pelvic pain, voiding dysfunction, muscle pain and dysfunction, and certain colorectal-related pain issues shows promise but requires additional rigorous evaluation.

Long-term adherence and response to botulinum toxin in different indications

Objective

The objective of the study was the analysis of adherence and self‐perceived treatment response to long‐term botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT‐A) treatment in different neurological indications.

Methods

In this retrospective, monocentric, observational study, cross‐sectional and longitudinal data of 1351 patients documenting 20705 injection appointments at the BoNT outpatient clinic of Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf between 1989 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients had been treated with BoNT for neurological conditions, including cervical dystonia (CD), blepharospasm (BSP), other dystonia (ODT), hemifacial spasm (HFS), and spasticity (SPAS). The parameters longitudinally analyzed for the entire cohort were therapy duration as well as the mean and cumulative BoNT‐A dose. Cross‐sectionally, for subgroups of at least 721, patients’ global self‐perceived quality of health and life, global self‐perceived reduction of symptoms by BoNT‐A treatment as well as the clinical global impression were evaluated. Furthermore, mouse hemidiaphragm assay antibodies (MHDA‐ABs) were analyzed in a subgroup.

Results

The mean treatment duration was 4.58 years (95% CI 4.32–4.84), and 678 (50.2%) therapy dropouts of 1351 patients occurred within the first 8 years. Therapy adherence and self‐perceived symptom reduction in long‐term BoNT‐A treatment over the years were significantly longer in BSP, HFS, and CD patients than in ODT and SPAS patients.

Interpretation

The treatment indication determines long‐term adherence and self‐perceived symptom reduction in BoNT‐A therapy, which are better in BSP, HFS, and CD patients than in ODT and SPAS patients. MHDA‐ABs had a significant impact on global self‐perceived symptom reduction, but with only a limited degree.

Transient Improvement after Switch to Low Doses of RimabotulinumtoxinB in Patients Resistant to AbobotulinumtoxinA

Botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) has been recommended as an alternative for patients who have become resistant to botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A). This study aimed to compare the clinical effect, within a patient, of four injections with low doses of rimabotulinumtoxinB with the effect of the preceding abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT/A) injections. In 17 patients with cervical dystonia (CD) who had become resistant to aboBoNT/A, the clinical effect of the first four rimabotulinumtoxinB (rimaBoNT/B) injections was compared to the effect of the first four aboBoNT/A injections using a global assessment scale and the TSUI score. After the first two BoNT/B injections, all 17 patients responded well and to a similar extent as to the first two BoNT/A injections, but with more side effects such as dry mouth and constipation. After the next BoNT/B injection, the improvement started to decline. The response to the fourth BoNT/B injection was significant (p < 0.048) lower than the fourth BoNT/A injection. Only three patients developed a complete secondary treatment failure (CSTF) and five patients a partial secondary treatment failure (PSTF) after four BoNT/B injections. In nine patients, the usual response persisted. With the use of low rimaBoNT/B doses, the induction of CSTF and PSTF to BoNT/B could not be avoided but was delayed in comparison to the use of higher doses. In contrast to aboBoNT/A injections, PSTF and CSTF occurred much earlier, although low doses of rimaBoNT/B had been applied.

Clinical Implications of Difference in Antigenicity of Different Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Preparations: Clinical Take-Home Messages from Our Research Pool and Literature

The three different botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) preparations being licensed in Europe and the U.S. differ in protein content, which seems to be a major factor influencing the antigenicity of BoNT/A. In the present study, several arguments out of our research pool were collected to demonstrate that the clinical response and antigenicity were different for the three BoNT/A preparations: some results of (1) a cross-sectional study on clinical outcome and antibody formation of 212 patients with cervical dystonia (CD) being treated between 2 and 22 years; 2) another cross-sectional study on the clinical aspects and neutralizing antibody (NAB) induction of 63 patients having developed partial secondary treatment under abobotulinum (aboBoNT/A) onabotulinumtoxin (onaBoNT/A) who were switched to incobotulinumtoxin (incoBoNT/A) in comparison to 32 patients being exclusively treated with incoBoNT/A. These results imply that (1) the presence of NAB cannot be concluded from the course of treatment, that (2) an increase in the dose and variability of outcome with treatment duration indicates the ongoing induction of NABs over time, that (3) the higher protein load of BoNT/A goes along with a higher incidence and prevalence of NAB induction and that (4) the best response to a BoNT/A is also dependent on the protein load of the preparation.

Association Between Secondary Botulinum Toxin A Treatment Failure in Cosmetic Indication and Anti-Complexing Protein Antibody Production

Introduction

Botulinum toxin A (BoT/A) treatment failure (BTF) affects patients subjected to repeated BoT/A exposure for cosmetic indications. BoT/A’s general formulation contains core BoT/A and complexing proteins. BTF may be caused by antibody-induced treatment failure. Antibodies against core BoT/A can occur; however, anti-complexing protein antibodies have never been demonstrated, and tools for anti-complexing protein antibody detection have not been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate immune involvement in BoT/A-nonresponsive patients.

Methods

Patients suspected of nonresponsiveness to BoT/A for cosmetic indications were recruited. All volunteers were categorized as BoT/A-responsive or BoT/A-tolerant according to frontalis testing with onabotulinumtoxinA (onaA). Twenty-two BoT/A-tolerant volunteers were recruited separately for frontalis testing with incobotulinumtoxinA (incoA). Anti-BoT/A and anti-complexing protein antibodies were quantified by special ELISA using sera from blood sampled before and after frontalis testing.

Results

Significantly higher levels of IgG against complexing protein were detected in onaA-tolerant sera but not in onaA-responders, leading to proposals that anti-complexing protein antibodies could cause onaA unresponsiveness. Some onaA-tolerant patients according to frontalis test with incoA were responsive to incoA. Newly developed absorption ELISA confirmed that incoA-responsive sera predominantly contained IgG against complexing proteins, whereas incoA-tolerant sera contained significant levels of IgG against core BoT/A. The presence of anti-complexing protein antibodies higher than 90.75% in sera of onaA-tolerant patients could respond to incoA. The ELISA technique might be employed as a tool to predict incoA responsiveness. Our frontalis testing after incoA treatment showed that anti-incoA IgG levels were not increased by incoA.

Conclusions

BoT/A-exposed patients may develop antibodies against core botulinum toxin and complexing proteins. Our study is the first to demonstrate that anti-complexing protein antibodies cause BTF. High levels of antibodies against complexing proteins can cause onaA unresponsiveness, although some patients were still incoA-responsive. Our developed ELISA to detect anti-complexing protein antibodies can determine whether onaA-tolerant patients respond to incoA without incoA frontalis testing.

Perspectives for the use of therapeutic Botulinum toxin as a multifaceted candidate drug to attenuate COVID-19

The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) resulting from a distinctive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to evolve in many countries and pose life-threatening clinical issues to global public health. While the lungs are the primary target for the SARS-CoV-2-mediated pathological consequence, the virus appears to invade the brain and cause unpredicted neurological deficits. In the later stage, COVID-19 can progress to pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, neurodegeneration and multi-organ dysfunctions leading to death. Though a significant portion of individuals with COVID-19 has been recovering from clinical symptoms, the pathological impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on the structural and functional properties of the lungs, heart, brain and other organs at the post-recovery state remains unknown. Presently, there is an urgent need for a remedial measure to combat this devastating COVID-19. Botulinum toxins (BoNTs) are potent neurotoxins that can induce paralysis of muscle and acute respiratory arrest in humans. However, a mild dose of the purified form of BoNT has been known to attenuate chronic cough, dyspnoea, pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, abnormal circulation, cardiac defects and various neurological deficits that have been recognised as the prominent clinical symptoms of COVID-19. Considering the fact, this review article provides 1) an overview of the SARS-CoV-2 mediated pathological impact on the lungs, heart and brain, 2) signifies the therapeutic uses of BoNTs against pulmonary failure, cardiac arrest and neurological deficits, and 3) emphasize the rationality for the possible use of BoNT to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and manage COVID-19.

Effective long-term treatment with incobotulinumtoxin (Xeomin®) without neutralizing antibody induction: a monocentric, cross-sectional study

Background

Among the spectrum of licensed botulinum neurotoxin preparations incobotulinumtoxin (incoBoNT/A; Xeomin®) is the only one which does not contain complex proteins. Therefore, incoBoNT/A has been suggested to have a low antigenicity, but precise estimations on incidence and prevalence of neutralizing antibody formation during long-term treatment are outstanding so far.

Methods

For the present cross-sectional study, 59 patients having exclusively been treated with incoBoNT/A (mono group) and 32 patients having been treated with other BoNT/A preparations less than nine times and who were then switched to at least 14 sessions of incoBoNT/A treatment (switch group) were recruited from one botulinum toxin outpatient clinic. Side effects and doses were extracted from the charts, and the efficacy of treatment was assessed by the patients using a visual analogue scale (0–100). The prevalence of neutralizing antibodies was tested by means of the mouse hemi-diaphragm assay (MHDA).

Findings

None of the patients in the mono and only two in the switch group had a positive MHDA-test. Across all indications and patients, mean improvement exceeded 67%. Improvement did not depend on age at onset, sex, change of dose or duration of treatment, but on disease entity. In patients with cervical dystonia, improvement was about the same in the mono and switch subgroup, but the last dose was different.

Conclusions

The present study confirms the low antigenicity of incoBoNT/A, which has immediate consequences for patient management, and the use of higher doses and shorter durations of reinjection intervals in botulinum toxin therapy.

Neurotoxin Impurities: A Review of Threats to Efficacy

Recently launched esthetic botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT/A) products include Nabota/Jeuveau, Meditoxin/Neuronox, and Botulax, which contain nontoxic accessory proteins and excipients. Clinical evidence supporting these formulations, including their purity and potential immunogenicity or their link to treatment failures, is limited. Any nonhuman protein, including nontoxin accessory proteins, can initiate immune reactions, especially if administered repeatedly, yet the issue of BoNT/A-induced immunogenicity is widely contested. However, there have been multiple reports of treatment failures and observations of BoNT/A-induced neutralizing antibodies. Compared with the purified formulation in Xeomin, these recently launched toxins contain higher total neurotoxin quantities, much of which is inactive and exposes patients to potentially immunogenic nontoxin proteins or inactive neurotoxins that increase their risk of developing treatment failure. Well-established products [especially abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and Xeomin] are accompanied by comprehensive and long-ranging clinical evidence on safety and efficacy in esthetic facial indications, which still remains undisclosed for many of the recently introduced toxins. Clinicians need this information as patients will require repeated BoNT treatments and may be unnecessarily but cumulatively exposed to potential immunogens. To underscore the need for caution and further evidence, we review some of the issues surrounding BoNT/A-induced immunogenicity and antibody-induced treatment failures and argue that using highly purified toxins that do not negatively impact patient outcomes is a prudent clinical decision.

Clinical relevance of neutralizing antibodies in botulinum toxin long-term treated still-responding patients with cervical dystonia

Background:

The aim of the study was to test the clinical relevance of neutralizing antibodies (NABs) in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) still responding to repeat injections with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A).

Methods:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-test evidence from a cross-sectional study on 221 CD-patients with treatment durations of between 2 and 21 years and still responding to repeat BoNT/A-injections showed the presence of antibodies against BoNT/A in 39 patients. A mouse hemi-diaphragm (MHDA) confirmation test was performed in these 39 ELISA-positive patients, and demographic (age, sex, age at onset of CD) and treatment-related (duration of treatment, mean dose of the last 10 injections, TSUI-score, patient’s subjective scoring of the treatment effect, patient’s scoring of quality of life by means of the CDQ24-questionnaire) data from these 39 patients were compared with data from ELISA-negative patients. Paralysis time, the MHDA outcome measure, was correlated with clinical data.

Results:

The ELISA-positive CD-patients had significantly higher TSUI-scores (p < 0.015), and had been treated for significant longer (p < 0.022) and with significantly higher doses (p < 0.001). Patient’s rating of BoNT/A-treatment effect and quality of life tended to be worse in ELISA-positive compared with ELISA-negative patients. The paralysis time of ELISA-positive patients was significantly correlated with the mean dose of the last 10 injections (p < 0.027) and the pain subscore of the CDQ24 (p < 0.012).

Conclusions:

Presence of NABs is clinically relevant in CD, leading to a significantly worse head position, therapy with significantly higher BoNT/A doses, and a correlation between the CDQ24 pain-subscore and antibody titers.

Botulinum toxin: Pharmacology and injectable administration for the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatological condition defined by excessive sweating beyond thermoregulatory needs with significant effects on patients' quality of life. Hyperhidrosis is categorized as primary or secondary: primary hyperhidrosis is mostly focal and idiopathic, whereas secondary hyperhidrosis is commonly generalized and caused by an underlying medical condition or use of medications. Various surgical and nonsurgical therapies exist for primary hyperhidrosis. Although botulinum toxin is one of the deadliest toxins known, when used in small doses, it is one of the most effective therapies for primary hyperhidrosis. Botulinum toxin injections are widely used as a second-line primary hyperhidrosis treatment option once topical treatment strategies have failed. This article provides an overview of the commercially available botulinum toxin formulations and their applications in the treatment of primary hyperhidrosis.

Comparing lanbotulinumtoxinA (Hengli®) with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) in the mouse hemidiaphragm assay

LanbotulinumtoxinA (LAN) is manufactured and registered in China since 1994. Despite its widespread use in China and its increasing use in other Asian countries and in South America, it is not yet well known elsewhere. We wanted to compare its potency labelling using the mouse diaphragm assay (MDA), an isolated muscle model for botulinum toxin (BT) potency measurements, which is superior to clinical tests and which was recently refined as an alternative batch release assay for BT manufacturing. We also wanted to estimate LAN manufacturing quality by testing its inter-batch potency consistency. Potencies of 20, 60 and 100 MU of LAN, onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) and incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) were measured by the inversely related paresis time (PT) in the MDA. The PT (M ± SD) of all doses of LAN, ONA and INCO was 90.4 ± 27.0 min, 114.9 ± 46.5 min and 94.3 ± 29.9 min, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated indistinguishable potency labelling of LAN and INCO, but revealed a slightly lower potency of ONA compared to LAN and INCO. PT of LAN batch 1 and LAN batch 2 was 86.9 ± 21.2 min and 94.0 ± 32.8 min, respectively (no statistically significant difference), suggesting an adequate LAN manufacturing consistency. The MDA is an appropriate instrument for potency testing of BT drugs, including new ones currently under development. Our results allow comparing therapeutic effects, adverse effects and economics of LAN, ONA and INCO. They also suggest adequate manufacturing consistency of LAN.

Using Botulinum Toxin A for Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome-Possible Pathomechanisms and Practical Issues

Treatment for patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is always challenging for urologists. The main mechanism of the botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is inhibition of muscle contraction, but the indirect sensory modulation and anti-inflammatory effect in the bladder also play important roles in treating patients with IC/BPS. Although current guidelines consider BoNT-A injection to be a standard treatment, some practical issues remain debatable. Most clinical evidence of this treatment comes from retrospective uncontrolled studies, and only two randomized placebo-control studies with limited patient numbers have been published. Although 100 U BoNT-A is effective for most patients with IC/BPS, the potential efficacy of 200 U BoNT-A has not been evaluated. Both trigone and diffuse body BoNT-A injections are effective and safe for IC/BPS, although comparison studies are lacking. For IC/BPS patients with Hunner’s lesion, the efficacy of BoNT-A injection remains controversial. Most patients with IC/BPS experience symptomatic relapse at six to nine months after a BoNT-A injection, although repeated injections exhibit a persistent therapeutic effect in long-term follow-up. Further randomized placebo-controlled studies with a larger number of patients are needed to support BoNT-A as standard treatment for patients with IC/BPS.

Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been used for the treatment of a variety of neurologic, medical and cosmetic conditions. Two serotypes, type A (BoNT-A) and type B (BoNT-B), are currently in clinical use. While considered safe and effective, their use has been rarely complicated by the development of antibodies that reduce or negate their therapeutic effect. The presence of antibodies has been attributed to shorter dosing intervals (and booster injections), higher doses per injection cycle, and higher amounts of antigenic protein. Other factors contributing to the immunogenicity of BoNT include properties of each serotype, such as formulation, manufacturing, and storage of the toxin. Some newer formulations with purified core neurotoxin devoid of accessory proteins may have lower overall immunogenicity. Several assays are available for the detection of antibodies, including both structural assays such as ELISA and mouse-based bioassays, but there is no consistent correlation between these antibodies and clinical response. Prevention and treatment of antibody-associated non-responsiveness is challenging and primarily involves the use of less immunogenic formulations of BoNT, waiting for the spontaneous disappearance of the neutralizing antibody, and switching to an immunologically alternate type of BoNT.

Development of inhibition ELISA to detect antibody-induced failure of botulinum toxin a therapy in cosmetic indications

Secondary treatment failure (STF) of botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) therapy in cosmetic indication has been postulated as production of antibody against active sites of BoNT/A in unresponsive patients. To prove of concept, detection of anti-BoNT/A antibody is required, however, current enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detects human IgGs against whole BoNT/A molecule. We developed an inhibition ELISA to quantify antibodies bound to the active sites of BoNT/A using three mouse monoclonal antibodies targeting translocation domain, receptor binding site and catalytic domain of BoNT/A prior to processing ELISA to detect human IgG (hIgG) against BoNT/A. Adults naïve to BoNT/A, or treated and responsive (toxin-response), or treated but unresponsive (toxin-tolerance) were recruited. Detection of hIgG revealed that naïve volunteers had basal level of hIgG against whole BoNT/A, whereas its level was significantly lower than those hIgG in BoNT/A-exposed cohorts. Higher anti-BoNT/A levels in sera from volunteers ever-exposed to BoNT/A indicates that BoNT/A may provoke immune responses in BoNT/A-treated cohorts. Inhibition ELISA demonstrated that levels of BoNT/A-specific hIgG in tolerance patients had a dramatic decrease in mouse monoclonal antibody blockage, suggesting presence of hIgG specific to BoNT/A's three active sites in STF patients. Therefore, our ELISA detected hIgG against whole BoNT/A protein and BoNT/A active sites suggesting that human antibodies may cause STF. To compare with frontalis test, our inhibition ELISA provided good accuracy at 83.1% (50% sensitivity and 89.9% specificity). Our test may help clinicians to diagnose possibility of STF and also to monitor immune status against BoNT/A.

The role of human serum albumin and neurotoxin associated proteins in the formulation of BoNT/A products

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is synthesized as a progenitor toxin complex (PTC) by Clostridium botulinum. This PTC comprises, in addition to the neurotoxin itself, neurotoxin associated proteins (NAPs) which are composed of three hemagglutinins and one non-toxic, non-hemagglutinin protein. After oral ingestion, these NAPs protect the neurotoxin from the low pH and proteases in the gastrointestinal tract and play a role in the entry via the intestinal barrier. Two of the three therapeutically used botulinum neurotoxin serotype A (BoNT/A) products (onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA) contain different amounts of NAPs, while incobotulinumtoxinA, lacks these proteins. In addition, human serum albumin (HSA) that is supposed to stabilize BoNT/A is added at different concentrations. Up to now, the function of the NAPs and HSA after parenteral therapeutic application is not completely understood. To investigate the influence of NAPs and HSA on potency of BoNT/A, we used the ex vivo mouse phrenic nerve hemidiaphragm assay. Increasing doses of HSA resulted dose-dependently in a more pronounced effect of BoNT/A. Though, a plateau was reached with concentrations of 0.8 mg/ml HSA and higher, the accessory addition of NAPs in a relevant amount (4 ng/ml) did not further enhance the effect of BoNT/A. In conclusion, in our ex vivo assay an adequate concentration of HSA prevented BoNT/A from loss of effect and supplementary NAPs did not alter this effect. A confirmation of these data in an in vivo assay is still lacking. However, it might be supposed that even in clinically applied BoNT/A products an increase of HSA accompanied by the avoidance of NAPs could potentially reduce the injected dose and, thus, the risk of unwanted side effects, the treatment costs as well as the risk of a secondary therapy failure due to BoNT/A neutralizing antibodies.

Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid approach in hemifacial spasm: our experience

Introduction

The use of surgical decompression of facial hemispasm due to the loop in the internal auditory canal is not always accepted due to the risk related to the surgical procedure. Currently a new surgical technique allows surgeons to work in safer conditions.

Objective

To report the results with endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid approach for facial nerve microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm due to neurovascular conflict. The surgical technique is described.

Methods

We carried out a prospective study in a tertiary referral center observing 12 (5 male, 7 female) patients, mean age 57.5 years (range 49–71) affected by hemifacial spasm, that underwent to an endoscope assisted retrosigmoid approach for microvascular decompression. We evaluated intra-operative findings, postoperative HFS resolution and complication rates.

Results

Hemifacial spasm resolution was noticed in 9/12 (75%) cases within 24 h after surgery and in 12/12 (100%) subjects within 45 days. A significant (p < 0.001) correlation between preoperative historical duration of hemifacial spasm and postoperative recovery timing was recorded. Only 1 patient had a complication (meningitis), which resolved after intravenous antibiotics with no sequelae. No cases of cerebrospinal fluid leak, facial palsy or hearing impairment were recorded. Hemifacial spasm recurrence was noticed in the only subject where the neurovascular conflict was due to a vein within the internal auditory canal.

Conclusions

The endoscope assisted retrosigmoid approach technique offers an optimal visualization of the neurovascular conflict thorough a minimally invasive approach, thus allowing an accurate decompression of the facial nerve with low complication rates. Due to the less invasive nature, the procedure should be considered in functional surgery of the cerebellar pontine angle as hemifacial spasm treatment, specially when the procedure is performed by an otolaryngologist.

Do complexing proteins provide mechanical protection for botulinum neurotoxins?

Botulinum toxin (BT) consists of botulinum neurotoxin and complexing proteins (CPs). CPs might provide mechanical protection for botulinum neurotoxin. As incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO, Xeomin®) does not contain CPs, we wanted to compare its mechanical stability to that of onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA, Botox®) containing CPs. For this, ONA and INCO were reconstituted without mechanical stress (NS) and with mechanical stress (WS) generated by a recently introduced stress test. Potencies were then measured by the paralysis times (PTs) in the mouse diaphragm assay. ONA-PT was 75.8 ± 10.3 min (n = 6) under NS and 116.7 ± 29.8 min (n = 6) under WS (two-tailed t test, p = 0.002). Mechanical stress increased the ONA-PT by 35.0% on the Growth Percentage Index. INCO-PT was 66.0 ± 7.0 min for NS and 76.0 ± 1.0 min for WS (t test, p = 0.129). Mechanical stress increased the INCO-PT by 13.2% on the Growth Percentage Index. Our data show that mechanical stress inactivates a CP-containing BT drug, but not a CP-free BT drug. We conclude that CPs do not provide protection against mechanical stress, supporting the view that CPs are not necessary for therapeutic purposes.

Progress in Applying the Three Rs to the Potency Testing of Botulinum Toxin Type A

Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is being increasingly used for a range of therapeutic purposes and also for cosmetic reasons. For many years, the potency of BTA has been measured by using an LD50 assay in mice. This assay is a cause for concern due to its unpleasant nature and extreme severity, and the requirement for high numbers of mice to be used. Alternatives to this potency assay are presently reviewed with particular reference to the work at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), and to recent work by the UK manufacturer of the substance. An in vivo local paralysis assay with considerably less severity has been developed and is in use at the NIBSC. Alternative, ex vivo functional assays in use include the measurement of BTA-induced paralysis of neurally-stimulated rodent diaphragm or rat intercostal muscle. The latter method has the advantage of allowing more preparations to be derived from one animal. However, these ex vivo methods have not yet been fully validated and accepted by regulatory agencies as potency assays. Endopeptidase assays, although not measuring muscle paralysis directly, may provide a very useful consistency test for batch release and may replace the routine use of the LD50 test for that purpose. These assays measure the cleavage of the SNAP-25 protein (the final stage of BTA action), and have been validated for batch release by the National Control Laboratory (NIBSC), and are in regular use there. ELISA assays, used alongside the endopeptidase assay, also provide useful confirmatory information on the amounts of functional (and non-functional) BTA present. The UK manufacturer is further validating its endopeptidase assay, an ex vivo muscle assay and an ELISA. It is anticipated that their work will lead to a change in the product license, hopefully within the next two years, and will form a critical milestone towards the end of the LD50 potency test.

Botulinum neurotoxin serotype D - A potential treatment alternative for BoNT/A and B non-responding patients

OBJECTIVES

Botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A and B (BoNT/A & B) are highly effective medicines to treat hyperactive cholinergic neurons. Due to neutralizing antibody formation, some patients may become non-responders. In these cases, the serotypes BoNT/C-G might become treatment alternatives. BoNT/D is genetically least related to BoNT/A & B and thereby circumventing neutralisation in A/B non-responders. We produced BoNT/D and compared its pharmacology with BoNT/A ex vivo in mice tissue and in vivo in human volunteers.

METHODS

BoNT/D was expressed recombinantly in E. coli, isolated by chromatography and its ex vivo potency was determined at mouse phrenic nerve hemidiaphragm preparations. Different doses of BoNT/D or incobotulinumtoxinA were injected into the extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscles (n = 30) of human volunteers. Their compound muscle action potentials were measured 11 times by electroneurography within 220 days.

RESULTS

Despite a 3.7-fold lower ex vivo potency in mice, a 110-fold higher dosage of BoNT/D achieved the same clinical effect as incobotulinumtoxinA while showing a 50% shortened duration of action.

CONCLUSIONS

BoNT/D blocks dose-dependently acetylcholine release in human motoneurons upon intramuscular administration, but its potency and duration of action is inferior to approved BoNT/A based drugs.

SIGNIFICANCE

BoNT/D constitutes a potential treatment alternative for BoNT/A & B non-responders.

Botox treatment in patients with chronic functional anorectal pain: experiences of a tertiary referral proctology clinic

Background

Anorectal pain is a symptom which may have both structural and functional causes, and can, sometimes, develop into a chronic pain syndrome. Functional causes in particular are challenging to treat when conservative treatment measures fail. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) can be applied to relax the anal sphincter and/or levator ani muscle to break the vicious circle of pain and contraction. In our tertiary referral proctology clinic, we evaluated the outcome of patients treated with BTX-A for chronic functional anorectal pain.

Methods

Our electronic database was searched for patients who had BTX-A treatment for chronic functional anorectal pain from 2011 to 2016. All medical data concerning history, treatments, and clinical outcome were retrieved. The clinical outcome (resolution of pain) was scored as good, temporary, or poor.

Results

A total of 113 patients [47 (42%) males; age 51years, SD 13 years, range 18–88 years] with chronic functional anorectal pain were included. The outcome of BTX-A treatment was good in 53 (47%), temporary in 23 (20%), and poor in 37 (33%). To achieve this outcome, 29 (45%) patients needed a single treatment, 11 (44%) a second treatment, and 13 (54%) ≥ 3 treatments.

Conclusions

Chronic functional anorectal pain can be treated successfully with BTX-A in 47% of patients who fail conservative management. Repeated injections may be needed to ensure complete cure in a subgroup of patients.

Randomized controlled trial comparing botulinum vs surgery for drooling in neurodisabilities

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of submandibular duct ligation (2-DL) and submandibular botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) for drooling in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

METHODS

A randomized, interventional, controlled, and partly single-blinded study was performed in which submandibular BoNT-A was compared with 2-DL to treat excessive drooling. Main outcomes included a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), drooling quotient (DQ), drooling severity (DS) scale and drooling frequency (DF) scale. Each was obtained at baseline, and 8 and 32 weeks post treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (mean age: 11 years, mean baseline VAS score 7.9, mean baseline DQ 27.3%) were randomized to the 2-DL or BoNT-A group. Four patients were excluded from analyses, leaving 53 patients for intention-to-treat analyses. Response to treatment, defined as a ≥50% reduction in DQ or VAS score, was higher for 2-DL after 32 weeks (63.0% vs 26.9%, p = 0.008). Both VAS score (24.5, p < 0.001) and DQ (-9.3%, p = 0.022) were significantly lower at follow-up after 2-DL vs BoNT-A. The total number of adverse events (p = 0.088, 40.7% vs 19.2%) and postoperative complaints was higher (p < 0.001, mean 9.6 vs 3.6 days) for 2-DL than for BoNT-A.

CONCLUSION

The 2-DL procedure is a more effective treatment for drooling than botulinum toxin, but carries a slightly greater risk of complications and morbidity.

TRIALREGISTERNL IDENTIFIER

NTR3537.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that for children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities and severe drooling, 2-DL compared to a one-time intraglandular BoNT-A injection is more effective at reducing drooling at 32 weeks.

Clinical Pharmacology of Botulinum Toxin Drugs

Botulinum toxin (BT) has changed from a deadly poison to a novel therapeutic principle for a large number of disorders in many medical areas.BT drugs are special in many ways: they are biologicals, their active ingredient BT is not patentable, their spectrum of clinical applications is extremely broad, their dose range is enormous, their mode of action is local and their life cycles are special.This review covers BT's therapeutic mode of action, time course of action, target tissues, pharmacological profile, adverse effects, interactions, potency labelling and antigenicity as well as BT's therapeutic preparations.

IncobotulinumtoxinA Efficacy and Safety in Adults with Upper-Limb Spasticity Following Stroke: Results from the Open-Label Extension Period of a Phase 3 Study

Introduction

The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of repeated incobotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of upper-limb post-stroke spasticity in adults.

Methods

Adults 18–80 years of age with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity who completed the 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled main period (MP) of a phase 3 trial (NCT01392300) were eligible to enrol in the 36-week open-label extension period (OLEX). The OLEX included three treatment cycles at fixed 12-week injection intervals; subjects were injected with 400 U incobotulinumtoxinA into the affected upper limb. Efficacy assessments included evaluation of muscle tone using the Ashworth Scale (AS) and the Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) assessed by the investigator, subject, and caregiver. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was monitored throughout the OLEX.

Results

A total of 296 of 299 subjects (99.0%) who completed the MP received incobotulinumtoxinA in the OLEX, and 248 subjects completed the 36-week OLEX. The proportion of subjects with at least a 1-point improvement in AS score from each incobotulinumtoxinA treatment to the respective 4-week post-injection visit ranged by cycle from 52.3% to 59.2% for wrist flexors, 49.1% to 52.3% for elbow flexors, 59.8% to 64.5% for finger flexors, 35.5% to 41.2% for thumb flexors, and 37.4% to 39.9% for forearm pronators (P < 0.0001 for all). Over 90% of subjects were assessed by the investigator to be at least minimally improved (4 weeks post-injection) on the GICS during each injection cycle; 61.0% in the 1st cycle, 58.2% in the 2nd cycle, and 57.4% in the 3rd cycle were considered much improved or very much improved on the GICS. Three percent of subjects (9/296) reported treatment-related AEs; the most frequently reported were pain in the extremity (n = 2, 0.7%) and constipation (n = 2, 0.7%). Serious AEs were reported by 22 subjects (7.4%); however, none were considered treatment-related.

Conclusions

Repeated injections of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of post-stroke upper-limb spasticity led to significant improvements in muscle tone and investigator’s global impression of change. Treatment was well tolerated, with no serious treatment-related AEs.

Funding

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH.

High prevalence of neutralizing antibodies after long-term botulinum neurotoxin therapy

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) during long-term BoNT/A treatment in different neurologic indications.

Methods

In this monocentric, observational cross-sectional study, 596 outpatients treated with BoNT/A for different indications were tested for BoNT/A binding antibodies by ELISA. Positive samples were investigated for NAbs with the mouse hemidiaphragm test. The prevalence of NAbs was analyzed for different indications: facial hemispasm, blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, other dystonia, and spasticity. Besides the rate of NAb-positive patients overall and per patient subgroup, a Kaplan-Meier analysis of the probability of remaining NAb negative with duration of treatment is provided, and a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis is performed to identify factors significantly contributing to the induction of NAbs.

Results

Overall, 83 of 596 patients (13.9%) had measurable NAbs. The probability of developing NAbs increased with the single and cumulative dose of treatment and was influenced by the BoNT/A formulation, while all other factors analyzed, including disease entity and treatment duration, had no additional influence.

Conclusions

We present the largest study to date of the prevalence of BoNT/A NAbs in a large unbiased cohort of patients including the relevant neurologic indications. Repeated injections of BoNT/A inevitably bear the risk of developing NAbs. However, in addition to avoiding booster injections and providing short intervals between injections, reducing the individual injected doses may diminish the risk of NAb induction independently of the indication for which BoNT/A is used.

Antibody-induced failure of botulinum toxin therapy: re-start with low-antigenicity drugs offers a new treatment opportunity

Botulinum toxin (BT) can stimulate formation of BT antibodies (BTAB) thus producing Antibody-Induced Therapy Failure (ABTF). BTAB titres may drop eventually. When BT therapy is then re-started with conventional BT drugs, BTAB titres re-increase promptly. We wanted to study whether the use of the low-antigenicity BT drug incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) can prevent this re-increase. 8 patients with cervical dystonia and ABTF with maximal BTAB titres (6 women, 2 men, age 41.4 ± 12.1 years, disease duration 6.6 ± 4.7 years) were studied. ABTF ocurred under onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) in five patients and under abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) in 3 after 8.8 ± 3.8 injection series and a treatment time of 962.0 ± 473.2 days. After 3881.5 ± 2468.3 days without BT, all BTAB titres had dropped to insignificant levels before BT therapy was re-started with INCO. Treatment parameters before and after re-start were as follows: single dose 219.2 ± 90.7 MU vs 252.6 ± 109.0 MU (ns), interinjection interval 119.7 ± 18.4 vs 104.5 ± 14.7 days (ns), cumulative dose 1893.8 ± 1161.6 MU vs 5130.4 ± 3602.5 MU (ns), treatment time 962.0 ± 505.9 vs 1895.4 ± 1211.4 days (ns) and number of injection series 8.8 ± 3.8 vs 19.3 ± 11.8 (ns). Repeated BTAB measurements and clinical examinations did not reveal any signs of ABTF after re-start. INCO offers a new and long-term treatment opportunity for ABTF patients when their BTAB titres have dropped. Our observations also confirm lower antigenicity of INCO compared to conventional BT drugs.

Comparing incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®) and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®): identical potency labelling in the hemidiaphragm assay

Botulinum toxin (BT) is provided by several manufacturers producing a number of different drugs. Their potency is given in internationally standardised mouse units (MU). Clinical practise, however, reveals that the potency labelling of different BT drugs may not be identical. We wanted to use the mouse diaphragm assay (MDA) to compare the two BT drugs onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA) and incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO). For this, we measured the paresis time (PT) of different ONA or INCO doses. All BT came from several different and unexpired drug batches. PT for 20MU were 169.7 ± 28.9 min (ONA) and 132.3 ± 1.5 min (INCO) (p = 0.089), for 60MU 105.3 ± 10.1 min and 84.7 ± 4.2 min (p = 0.031), for 100MU 69.7 ± 1.5 min and 66.0 ± 7.0 min (p = 0.462) and for 140MU 74.7 ± 0.6 min and 62.3 ± 2.1 min (p = 0.100), respectively. The overall PT were 104.8 ± 12.5 and 86.3 ± 8.5 min (p = 0.178). Results presented here do not reveal differences in potency labelling between ONA and INCO, even when the full range of therapeutic doses are examined, although there was a trend towards stronger INCO effects. Data confirm previous reports on identical potency labelling of ONA and INCO. The MDA seems to be an appropriate instrument to test the potency labelling of other BT drugs as well, including new BT drugs currently under development.

Dual-route targeted vaccine protects efficiently against botulinum neurotoxin A complex

Clostridium botulinum readily persists in the soil and secretes life-threatening botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) that are categorized into serotypes A to H, of which, serotype A (BoNT/A) is the most commonly occurring in nature. An efficacious vaccine with high longevity against BoNT intoxication is urgent. Herein, we developed a dual-route vaccine administered over four consecutive weeks by mucosal and parenteral routes, consisting of the heavy chain (Hc) of BoNT/A targeting dendritic cell peptide (DCpep) expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus as a secretory immunogenic protein. The administered dual-route vaccine elicited robust and long-lasting memory B cell responses comprising germinal center (GC) B cells and follicular T cells (Tfh) that fully protected mice from lethal oral BoNT/A fatal intoxication. Additionally, passively transferring neutralizing antibodies against BoNT/A into naïve mice induced robust protection against BoNT/A lethal intoxication. Together, a targeted vaccine employing local and systemic administrative routes may represent a novel formulation eliciting protective B cell responses with remarkable longevity against threatening biologic agents such as BoNTs.

An in vitro cell-based potency assay for pharmaceutical type A botulinum antitoxins

Botulism therapy relies on passive immunization with antitoxin. The mouse neutralization test is the only pharmacopeia assay to measure the potency of antitoxin preparations. Herein, we present an in vitro cell-based assay for the measurement of pharmaceutical type A antitoxin potency. Accuracy, reproducibility and compatibility with the mouse bioassay were demonstrated using different batches of standard antitoxin and toxin preparations. The established assay may substantially reduce the use of laboratory animals in the process of pharmaceutical antitoxin production.

Immuno-detection of cleaved SNAP-25 from differentiated mouse embryonic stem cells provides a sensitive assay for determination of botulinum A toxin and antitoxin potency

Botulinum toxin type A is a causative agent of human botulism. Due to high toxicity and ease of production it is classified by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention as a category A bioterrorism agent. The same serotype, BoNT/A, is also the most widely used in pharmaceutical preparations for treatment of a diverse range of neuromuscular disorders. Traditionally, animals are used to confirm the presence and activity of toxin and to establish neutralizing capabilities of countermeasures in toxin neutralization tests. Cell based assays for BoNT/A have been reported as the most viable alternative to animal models, since they are capable of reflecting all key steps (binding, translocation, internalization and cleavage of intracellular substrate) involved in toxin activity. In this paper we report preliminary development of a simple immunochemical method for specifically detecting BoNT/A cleaved intracellular substrate, SNAP-25, in cell lysates of neurons derived from mouse embryonic stem cells. The assay offers sensitivity of better than 0.1LD50/ml (3fM) which is not matched by other functional assays, including the mouse bioassay, and provides serotype specificity for quantitative detection of BoNT/A and anti-BoNT/A antitoxin. Subject to formal validation, the method described here could potentially be used as a substitute for the mouse bioassay to measure potency and consistency of therapeutic products.

Long-term stability of reconstituted incobotulinumtoxinA: how can we reduce costs of botulinum toxin therapy?

Botulinum neurotoxin (BNT), the biologically active component of botulinum toxin (BT), is a large double-stranded protein susceptible to various physical and chemical influences. All BT type A (BT-A) drugs are stored as powders allowing shelf lives from 24 to 36 months. After reconstitution, the specified shelf life is reduced to 8-24 h. Some studies, however, suggest longer shelf life. We wanted to test the long-term stability of reconstituted BT-A drugs in the hemidiaphragm assay (HDA), a high quality BT potency test. For this incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO) was reconstituted and stored in at 4-8 °C, whilst at various points of time probes of it were taken and potency tested with the HDA. Altogether 18 measurements were performed throughout a period of 52.1 weeks. The paralysis time in the HDA was 67.3 ± 5.2 min (min. 59 min, max. 76 min). The linear regression line was described by y = -0.0163x + 67.582. The paralysis time measured during the first 10 weeks (n = 11) was 67.5 ± 5.3 min, during the last 10 weeks (n = 7) 67.1 ± 4.9 min. Reconstituted INCO does not show reduction of potency throughout 52 weeks as tested by the high quality HDA. Lack of complexing proteins does not de-stabilise INCO. Our data allow un-used reconstituted INCO to be stored for further use. This may have a considerable impact on the costs of BT therapy. Further studies will have to demonstrate sterility of the reconstituted BT drug beyond the so far reported 6 weeks.

SiMa Cells for a Serotype Specific and Sensitive Cell-Based Neutralization Test for Botulinum Toxin A and E

Botulinum toxins (BoNTs), of which there are seven serotypes, are among the most potent neurotoxins, with serotypes A, B and E causing human botulism. Antitoxins form the first line of treatment for botulism, and functional, highly sensitive in vitro methods for toxin neutralization are needed to replace the current in vivo methods used for determination of antitoxin potency. In this preliminary proof of concept study, we report the development of a neutralization test using the neuroblastoma SiMa cell line. The assay is serotype specific for either BoNT/A or BoNT/E, which both cleave unique sequences on SNAP-25 within SiMa cells. The end point is simple immunodetection of cleaved SNAP-25 from cell lysates with antibodies detecting only the newly exposed sequence on SNAP-25. Neutralizing antibodies prevent the toxin-induced cleavage of SNAP-25. The toxin neutralization assay, with an EC50 of ~2 mIU/mL determined with a standardized reference antiserum, is more sensitive than the mouse bioassays. Relevance was demonstrated with commercial and experimental antitoxins targeting different functional domains, and of known in vivo neutralizing activities. This is the first report describing a simple, specific, in vitro cell-based assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against BoNT/A and BoNT/E with a sensitivity exceeding that of the mouse bioassay.

IncobotulinumtoxinA: A Review in Upper Limb Spasticity

Intramuscular incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(®)) is indicated for the treatment or improvement of adult patients with upper limb spasticity (featured indication), cervical dystonia, blepharospasm and glabellar lines. It is a highly purified formulation of botulinum toxin type A that inhibits acetylcholine signalling at neuromuscular junctions, reducing muscle hypertonia. This narrative review discusses the clinical use of incobotulinumtoxinA in adults with upper limb spasticity and summarizes its pharmacological properties. In single-treatment phase 3 trials, compared with placebo, incobotulinumtoxinA treatment improved muscle tone, global spasticity, functional spasticity-related disability and some aspects of carer burden in adults with upper limb spasticity. These beneficial effects of incobotulinumtoxinA on muscle tone were generally maintained in extension studies, in which up to five additional incobotulinumtoxinA treatments were administered. Functional spasticity-related disability and carer burden were also reduced during longer-term incobotulinumtoxinA treatment. IncobotulinumtoxinA was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with relatively few patients experiencing treatment-related adverse events, most of which were of mild to moderate intensity. No neutralizing antibodies that would potentially cause secondary nonresponse against incobotulinumtoxinA were detected after single and multiple treatments in these trials or in phase 3 and 4 trials of incobotulinumtoxinA in other indications, which may be an advantage of this purified formulation. Further research would help to more fully determine the impact of neurotoxin purification in terms of reducing the potential risk of immunogenic responses during long-term treatment. Hence, incobotulinumtoxinA is a useful treatment option for upper limb spasticity in adult patients.

Neutralizing Antibody and Botulinum Toxin Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The formation of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) directed specifically against the active neurotoxin part of the botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) complex is often cited as a major cause of secondary non-responsiveness (SnR) to treatment. This systematic and meta-analytic review evaluates the frequency of NAbs among patients treated with BoNT therapy for any clinical indication. A comprehensive database search strategy was designed to retrieve relevant clinical data from the published literature up to April 2013. All English-language publications that analyzed NAbs prevalence in more than ten patients were included, regardless of BoNT formulation, assay method, and study design. For the meta-analysis, patients were divided into three categories: secondary nonresponse (SnR) patients, clinically responding patients and all patients, independently of BoNT responsiveness. The meta-analysis included 61 studies reporting data for 8525 patients; 4972 dystonic patients, 1170 patients with spasticity, 294 patients with urologic indications, 396 patient with hyperhidrosis, 1659 patients with glabellar line, and 34 patients with hypersalivation. Among the ‘‘all patients’’ group NAbs frequency was 20%for dystonia, 5.9%for spasticity, and 2.7% for urologic patients and 1.1% for other conditions. The prevalence of NAbs was lower (3.5%) among clinically responding patients and higher in 53.5%SnR patients. About a half of patients with SnR do not have NAbs. NAbs was high among patients treated with RIMA but it was not associated with clinical non-responsiveness. Meta-analysis of the frequency of NAbs and SnR are limited by the heterogeneity of study design and reported outcomes. Indeed the analysis of several factors that can influence the development of NAbs, i.e.,MHCof patients, frequency and site of injection, injection technique, cumulative dose, and toxin denaturation, was not specifically evaluated due to the paucity and heterogeneity of data. The identification of all these missing data should be taken into account in order to improve the methodology of future studies.

Submolecular recognition regions of the HN domain of the heavy chain of botulinum neurotoxin type A by T cells from toxin-treated cervical dystonia patients

We have recently reported the submolecular T-cell recognition profile of the C-terminal half (H_C, residues 855-1296) of the heavy (H) chain of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) with peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) from 25 BoNT-treated cervical dystonia (CD) patients. In the current study, we describe the mapping of the T-cell responses of the patients to the N-terminal half (H_N, residues 449-859) of the heavy chain by using 29 synthetic overlapping peptides encompassing the entire H_N domain of BoNT/A. The profiles of the T-cell responses to the peptides varied among the patients. Samples from 14 patients treated solely with BoNT/A recognized 1-9 (average 3.7) peptides/sample at Z>3.0 level. Three peptide regions representing residues 631-649, 659-677 and 743-761 were frequently recognized by 29-64% of the patients. In patients with positive anti-BoNT/A antibody responses the overall positive T cell responses to the H_N peptides were significantly increased compared to antibody-negative patients. Influence of treatment parameters on the T-cell recognition of the H_N peptides was also observed. The results were compared with those of previously identified H_C region.