Ex vivo hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion

TGFBI Expressed by Bone Marrow Niche Cells and Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells Regulates Hematopoiesis

The interactions of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) with extracellular matrix (ECM) components and cells from the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment control their homeostasis. Regenerative BM conditions can induce expression of the ECM protein transforming growth factor beta-induced gene H3 (TGFBI or BIGH3) in murine HSPCs. In this study, we examined how increased or reduced TGFBI expression in human HSPCs and BM mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) affects HSPC maintenance, differentiation, and migration. HSPCs that overexpressed TGFBI showed accelerated megakaryopoiesis, whereas granulocyte differentiation and proliferation of granulocyte, erythrocyte, and monocyte cultures were reduced. In addition, both upregulation and downregulation of TGFBI expression impaired HSPC colony-forming capacity of HSPCs. Interestingly, the colony-forming capacity of HSPCs with reduced TGFBI levels was increased after long-term co-culture with MSCs, as measured by long-term culture-colony forming cell (LTC-CFC) formation. Moreover, TGFBI downregulation in HSPCs resulted in increased cobblestone area-forming cell (CAFC) frequency, a measure for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) capacity. Concordantly, TGFBI upregulation in HSPCs resulted in a decrease of CAFC and LTC-CFC frequency. These results indicate that reduced TGFBI levels in HSPCs enhanced HSC maintenance, but only in the presence of MSCs. In addition, reduced levels of TGFBI in MSCs affected MSC/HSPC interaction, as observed by an increased migration of HSPCs under the stromal layer. In conclusion, tight regulation of TGFBI expression in the BM niche is essential for balanced HSPC proliferation and differentiation.

Hematopoietic growth factors for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and expansion

During inflammation and cytopenia, increased levels of hematopoietic growth factors (HPGFs) induce mobilization and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), resulting in spatial and quantitative in vivo expansion of the hematopoietic tissue. Exogenous administration of recombinant HPGFs, particularly granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), is routine for mobilization of stem cells, followed by collection and transplantation of autologous or allogeneic stem cells. In this review, we summarize experience using different HPGFs and HPGF combinations for stem cell mobilization, such as G-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-3 (IL-3), stem cell factor (SCF), and others. Preclinical and clinical studies of so-called early- and late-acting HPGFs for ex vivo expansion of HPCs are discussed, also with respect to the unresolved question whether expansion of repopulating stem cells can be achieved in vitro.

Recent Australian experience with hemopoietic stem and progenitor cell expansion

This review provides insight into two clinical trials conducted with ex vivo manipulated CD34+ cells. The first was an attempt to deliver a gene therapy for treatment of HIV and the second an attempt to improve rates of hemopoietic recovery with ex vivo generated myeloid cells.

Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported that repeated cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT), can be supported by unmanipulated autologous PBPC. Here we investigate whether purified CD34+ cells, obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the Isolex 300i device, can support such therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-nine consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer had PBPC mobilized and harvested following chemotherapy and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day). Patients with > 4.0 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in the apheresis product underwent CD34-selection using the Isolex 300i (v2.0) device. All cells collected were equally divided into three aliquots and cryopreserved. Patients who did not achieve this threshold had unmanipulated cells collected and stored. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and either ifosfamide (10 g/m2) or cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2). It was intended for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e 1/3 for each cycle) and to compare hemopoietic recovery between patients receiving CD34-selected cells or unmanipulated cells.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 29 patients (45%) did not mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells to undergo CD34-selection. The remaining 16 patients underwent CD34-selection with a median purity of 84.3% (range: 16.3-96.1%) and yield of 34% (range: 1-60%). Fifteen of these patients proceeded to HDT and 42 of the planned 45 cycles were administered. Nine patients had all three HDT cycles supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (range: 0.04-3.01). Three of the 15 patients required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of delayed neutrophil recovery. Of the 13 patients whose PBPCs did not undergo CD34+ cell selection, 11 proceeded to HDT with a median of 3.2 x 10(6)/kg (range: 2.0-4.4) unselected cells infused per cycle and 31 of 33 planned cycles were delivered. When hemopoietic recovery was compared between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 34) and unmanipulated cells (n = 31), there was a modest slowing in the patients receiving CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 x 10(9)/L = 11 days versus 10 days (P = 0.0122) and platelets > 20 x 10(9)/L = 14 days versus 13 days (P = 0.0009). No difference in recovery to 50 x 10(9)/L was observed (P = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells are capable of supporting multiple cycles of HDT. However, we were unable to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells to perform this processing in 45% (13/29) of patients and further improvements in yield are required to overcome the modest delay in neutrophil and platelet recovery.

Differential tissue expression of epitopes of the tetraspanin CD151 recognised by monoclonal antibodies

CD151, a member of the tetraspanin family of cell membrane proteins, is widely expressed in epithelial, endothelial and muscle cells as well as platelets and megakaryocytes. Several monoclonal antibodies recognising CD151 in transfected cells and immunoprecipitating typical bands of 28 and 32 kDa from cell lysates have been produced. Surprisingly, these antibodies show different patterns of staining on tissue sections and on haemopoietic cells. Here we show that these differences are at least in part due to masking of certain epitopes in integrin/CD151 complexes. These data have important implications for the use of monoclonal antibodies in studies of the distribution and function of CD151. Of six monoclonal antibodies from four laboratories, 11B1 was found to be the most reliable for detection of CD151 in different cell and tissue contexts.

Ex vivo culture of peripheral blood CD34+ cells: effects of hematopoietic growth factors on production of neutrophilic precursors

A major potential application for ex vivo culture of hematopoietic progenitor cells is the treatment of cytopenia following high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic transplantation. We have previously postulated that infusion of a sufficient number of neutrophil postprogenitor cells generated by ex vivo culture of CD34+ cells may be able to abrogate neutropenia. In this article, we describe further development of an efficient stromal-free, cytokine-dependent, static culture system for generation of these cells. Our previous studies indicated that maximal production of nucleated cells and myeloid progenitor cells from PB CD34+ cells occurred with multiple hematopoietic growth factor (HGF), notably the 6-HGF combination of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF), and stem cell factor (SCF). In the present study, we determine the contribution of each of these 6 HGF in generation of neutrophilic precursors. SCF, G-CSF, and IL-3 were found to be the most important HGF for production of neutrophilic cells. The 4-HGF combination of IL-3, IL-6, G-CSF, and SCF was optimized by performing dose-response experiments and shown to be as potent as 6 HGF for production of nascent CFU-GM and neutrophilic precursors.

Ex vivo manipulation of cell subsets for cell therapies

Large-scale cell separation and ex vivo expansion technologies will form the basis for development of new cellular products for the treatment of cancer and fatal viral diseases. The cell subsets that are likely to play a significant role in cellular therapy include hematopoietic stem cells, platelet and granulocyte precursors, cytotoxic lymphocytes, and genetically modified hematopoietic or lymphoid precursors. Cell enrichment techniques are required to eliminate tumor cells from autologous stem cell grafts and to reduce the size of culture systems required for expansion or gene transfection. The consumption of expensive culture components such as cytokines and serum may be reduced by the use of perfusion bioreactor devices. Methods that have been developed for the production of cell subsets for cellular therapy are reviewed.