Induction of an anti-vaccine response by T cell vaccination in non-human primates and humans

An Evaluation of 20 Years of EU Framework Programme-Funded Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Translational Research in Non-Human Primates

Aging western societies are facing an increasing prevalence of chronic inflammatory and degenerative diseases for which often no effective treatments exist, resulting in increasing health-care expenditure. Despite high investments in drug development, the number of promising new drug candidates decreases. We propose that preclinical research in non-human primates can help to bridge the gap between drug discovery and drug prescription. Translational research covers various stages of drug development of which preclinical efficacy tests in valid animal models is usually the last stage. Preclinical research in non-human primates may be essential in the evaluation of new drugs or therapies when a relevant rodent model is not available. Non-human primate models for life-threatening or severely debilitating diseases in humans are available at the Biomedical Primate Research Centre (BPRC). These have been instrumental in translational research for several decades. In order to stimulate European health research and innovation from bench to bedside, the European Commission has invested heavily in access to non-human primate research for more than 20 years. BPRC has hosted European users in a series of transnational access programs covering a wide range of research areas with the common theme being immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. We present an overview of the results and give an account of the studies performed as part of European Union Framework Programme (EU FP)-funded translational non-human primate research performed at the BPRC. These data illustrate the value of translational non-human primate research for the development of new therapies and emphasize the importance of EU FP funding in drug development.

T cell vaccination in systemic lupus erythematosus with autologous activated T cells

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoreactive T cell mediated autoimmune disease. Immunization with inactivated autoreactive T cells may induce idiotype anti-idiotypic reaction to deplete specific subsets of autoreactive T cells involved in SLE. Six SLE patients unsuitable or refused to use immunosuppressants were treated with T cell vaccination. Their clinical manifestations and laboratory parameters including mixed lymphocyte reactions were evaluated. Autoreactive T cell clones were derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the patients and 1 × 107 irradiated T cells were inoculated subcutaneously at 0, two, six and eight weeks, respectively. The enrolled patients were followed up for 32-40 months at an interval of three to six months. The clinical characteristics and laboratory abnormalities improved after inoculation without increasing the dose of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants in most patients. SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) scores decreased. Proliferative responses against the T cell vaccine were observed in four of six patients. At the time of this report, the six patients remain in clinical remission. No significant side effect from the vaccination was noticed during the follow-up period. The results of this pilot study indicate that T cell vaccination is a safe and effective treatment in SLE.

Regulatory T Cells in Autoimmune Diseases: Anti-Ergotypic T Cells

T regulatory cells play an important role in regulating T-cell responses to self-antigens and control autoimmunity and autoimmune disease. Anti-ergotypic T cells are a subset of such regulatory T cells that respond to activation markers, ergotopes, expressed on other activated T cells. Anti-ergotypic T cells do not respond to nonactivated T cells. Ergotopes include the a-chain of the IL-2 receptor (CD25). Anti-ergotypic T cells were found to downregulate experimental diseases such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and adjuvant arthritis (AA). Anti-ergotypic T cells are present in humans and are activated after T-cell vaccination. Here we review anti-ergotypic T cells in animal models and in humans and contrast anti-ergotypic T cells with other regulatory T-cell subsets.

The evolution of mathematical immunology

The types of mathematical models used in immunology and their scope have changed drastically in the past 10 years. Classical models were based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs), difference equations, and cellular automata. These models focused on the 'simple' dynamics obtained between a small number of reagent types (e.g. one type of receptor and one type of antigen or two T-cell populations). With the advent of high-throughput methods, genomic data, and unlimited computing power, immunological modeling shifted toward the informatics side. Many current applications of mathematical models in immunology are now focused around the concepts of high-throughput measurements and system immunology (immunomics), as well as the bioinformatics analysis of molecular immunology. The types of models have shifted from mainly ODEs of simple systems to the extensive use of Monte Carlo simulations. The transition to a more molecular and more computer-based attitude is similar to the one occurring over all the fields of complex systems analysis. An interesting additional aspect in theoretical immunology is the transition from an extreme focus on the adaptive immune system (that was considered more interesting from a theoretical point of view) to a more balanced focus taking into account the innate immune system also. We here review the origin and evolution of mathematical modeling in immunology and the contribution of such models to many important immunological concepts.

T cell vaccination in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Four secondary progressive MS patients were vaccinated with bovine myelin-reactive irradiated T cell lines from their peripheral blood. Patients were followed for 30-39 months, and monitored for immunological responses toward the vaccine, and for their clinical characteristics. Two patients showed stable EDSS score over time, one patient showed improvement by one EDSS step, and in the remaining patient her EDSS advanced over time. After the second inoculation there was a progressive decline of circulating whole myelin-reactive T cells, MBP143-168, PLP104-117, and MOG43-55-peptide-reactive T cells. In contrast the frequency of tetanus toxoid-reactive T cells remained unchanged. T cell vaccination (TCV) was also associated with a decline of myelin-specific IL-2- and IFN-gamma-secreting T cells. Twelve T cell lines (TCL) that recognize the inoculates were isolated from the peripheral blood of two patients. Ten of these TCL were CD8(+) and lysed the inoculates in a MHC Class I restricted manner. The remaining two TCL were CD4(+), and lysed the inoculates by MHC Class II restricted cytolytic activity. All T cell lines lysed not only myelin-reactive T cells, but also TCL specific for MBP143-168, PLP104-117 and MOG43-55 peptides. Control TCL specific for tetanus toxoid were not lysed. Neutralizing anti-Fas mAb did not influence the killing. Moreover, culture supernatants from two TCL which produce IL-10, were able to block the proliferation of myelin protein-specific TCL. This effect was abrogated using mAbs specific for IL-10. The data obtained indicated that TCV using autologous irradiated bovine myelin-reactive T cells promotes an effective depletion of T cells reactive against different myelin antigens.

New therapeutic targets for rheumatoid arthritis

New insights into the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and consequently new targets of therapy are covered in a broad overview fashion. Short-term significant beneficial effect on RA disease activity has been established in a small but rapidly growing number of double-blind placebo-controlled trials now including recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, chimeric (mouse/human) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against TNF alpha (cA2), humanised (human/mouse) anti-TNF alpha mAb (CDP571) and recombinant human TNF-receptor-Fc fusion protein (TNFR:Fc). Placebo-controlled trials of anti-T cells agents such as chimeric anti-CD4 mAb (cM-T412) and anti-CD5 immunoconjugate, did not demonstrate clinical benefit. A placebo-controlled study of the anti-T cell derived cytokine IL-2 (DAB486IL-2) showed only modes clinical improvement. Other anti-T cell approaches such as autologous T cell vaccination and induction of tolerance by oral type II collagen have been unsuccessful. The one controlled trial with an anti-inflammatory cytokine, recombinant human IFN-gamma, showed modest clinical benefits. Controlled trials with IL-4 and IL-10 and with anti-adhesion molecules are awaited.

Autoreactive CD4- CD8- alpha beta T cells to vaccinate adjuvant arthritis

Studies suggested that experimental autoimmune diseases can effectively be prevented and treated by application of normal autoreactive T cells or autoreactive T cells in an attenuated form. In this study, several autoreactive CD4- CD8- T-cell clones (A2, A6, and A13 cells) were isolated for the first time from the draining lymph nodes of Lewis rats with adjuvant arthritis (AA). Surprisingly, intraperitoneal inoculation with A13 cells, but not A2 or A6 cells protected rats from AA both clinically and histologically. It was demonstrated that A13 cells were CD4- CD8- alpha beta T cells, and showed proliferative responses to irradiated syngeneic spleen cells (antigen-presenting cells; APC). Interestingly, A13 cells proliferated against concanavalin A (Con A) and staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), but did not show any proliferation to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mt), or its 65 000 MW heat-shock protein (HSP). Rats protected from AA by inoculation with A13 cells showed a specific anti-idiotypic delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction compared with other autoreactive T cells (A2 or A6 cells). These findings demonstrate that AA can be suppressed by autoreactive CD4- CD8- alpha beta T cells, and these cells may be used as therapeutic agents in experimental autoimmunity.

Early rheumatoid arthritis. Future treatment

As the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) becomes more clearly defined there is the expectation that biotechnological advances may allow additional forms of therapeutic intervention that are specific for the disease process. The purpose of this review is to describe the use of biological agents in the treatment of RA. Encouraging results in animal models using vaccines based on the pathogenic T-cell or the autoantigen have prompted the design of selective immune-based therapies. Preliminary studies following this strategy have not yet shown clinical efficacy. The results of early studies with monoclonal antibodies against leukocyte surface antigen were promising but were not sustained in controlled studies. Exciting data have been collected from placebo-controlled studies of monoclonal antibodies against TNF alpha. The development of biological agents in RA may not be as quick as expected but the steady progress makes it likely that our weapons to combat unwanted autoimmune responses will become more accurate and effective.

Innovative treatment approaches for rheumatoid arthritis. T-cell regulation

There is considerable evidence to implicate T cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They initiate and sustain inflammation and therefore are attractive targets for immunotherapy. Several strategies targeting T cells have been tried in RA. The use of monoclonal antibodies to deplete T cells have been used extensively but with little success. Studies have shown that T cell depleting antibodies produce profound peripheral blood lymphopenia but they are less effective in depleting lymphocytes in the joint. Since clinical efficacy is likely to depend on depleting almost all synovial lymphocytes, high doses of monoclonal antibodies would have to be given. However, the invariably severe peripheral blood lymphopenia induced by such a regimen is likely to result in profound immunosuppression. Therefore, this strategy has been abandoned and recent attempts have been made to induce tolerance in RA. In animal models of RA, treatment with high dose non-depleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody protects them from arthritis induced by injection of streptococcal cell wall. In addition, it leads to a state of anergy which protects the animals from arthritis induction without further treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. This is currently being used in clinical trials of RA. Other tolerance inducing treatment strategies include T cell or T cell receptor vaccination and oral tolerance. The former is particularly difficult since the rheumatoid arthritogenic antigen and the pathogenic T cell remain unknown. The latter has shown promise in placebo controlled trials although the ideal dosage remains unknown. The mechanism of action of oral tolerance involves either immunosuppressive T cell cytokines, T cell anergy or depletion.

Therapeutic regulation of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis

TCR repertoire studies in RA have yielded conflicting data. These studies were initiated on the premise that clonal expression of T cells at the site of inflammation could serve as a target for immune therapies designed on the basis of the option to inactivate or eliminate the presumed pathogenic T cells. These analyses have demonstrated the existence of a highly diverse overall TCR repertoire on the basis of extensive usage of TCR V genes both in synovial fluid and tissue. However, clusters of RA patients can be recognized who share increased usage frequencies of defined TCR V genes among synovial fluid or synovial tissue lymphocytes. Subsequent analysis of the CDR3 regions among diverse overall TCR repertoires have revealed the presence of conserved amino acid sequences in the CDR3 regions of the variable portions of TCRs in T lymphocytes derived from the site of inflammation. These findings suggest that a selective, antigen-driven expansion of T lymphocytes is occurring in the inflamed joints. Parallel to the TCR-repertoire studies, we investigated whether vaccines prepared from synovial T cells could modulate T-cell reactivity. The studies were based on previous work on TCV in animals, revealing that attenuated non-specific T-cell lines could serve as a vaccine. The results obtained in 13 RA patients showed no clear indication for a cellular or humoral immune response. Our experience with TCV in RA patients showed that this technique is feasible and safe. We found some evidence for a modulated T-cell reactivity both in vivo and in vitro. These results show at least some immunomodulatory effect af T-cell vaccination, although the antigen specificity of the effect of this intervention remains to be shown. Because of the convincing studies in animals and MS patients, further studies in RA should focus on the effect of vaccination using vaccines prepared from disease-inducing cells. In this respect, determination of the CDR3 regions of synovial T cells could lead to the identification of those T cells that are relevant for the disease.