Carotid surgery in octogenarians in Veterans Affairs medical centers

Management of extracranial carotid artery disease

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in developed nations. Up to 88% of strokes are ischemic in nature. Extracranial carotid artery atherosclerotic disease is the third leading cause of ischemic stroke in the general population and the second most common nontraumatic cause among adults younger than 45 years. This article provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for the management of extracranial atherosclerotic disease, including imaging for screening and diagnosis, medical management, and interventional management.

Patient, Anatomic, and Procedural Characteristics That Increase the Risk of Carotid Interventions

Subjective characteristics for increased risk of carotid artery stenting (CAS) have included thrombus-containing lesions, heavily calcified lesions, very tortuous vessels, and near occlusions. More objective high-risk features include contraindications to dual antiplatelet therapy, a history of bleeding complications, and lack of femoral artery vascular access. Variables that increase the risk of CAS complications are attributed to patient characteristics, anatomic features, or procedural factors. Operator and hospital volume affect the risk of complications occurring with CAS. As the complexity and difficulty of CAS patients increases, the need for more highly skilled operators and teams becomes even more necessary to minimize complications.

Carotid artery stenting: patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics that increase procedural complications

From the earliest experiences with carotid artery stenting (CAS) presumptive high risk features have included thrombus-containing lesions, heavily calcified lesions, very tortuous vessels, and near occlusions. In addition patients have been routinely excluded from CAS trials if they have contra-indications to dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and thienopyridines), a history of bleeding complications and severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD) making femoral artery vascular access difficult. Variables that increase the risk of CAS complications can be attributed to patient characteristics, anatomic or lesion features, and procedural factors. Clinical features such as older age (≥80 years), decreased cerebral reserve (dementia, multiple prior strokes, or intracranial microangiopathy) and angiographic characteristics such as excessive tortuosity (more than two 90° bends within 5 cm of the target lesion) and heavy calcification (concentric calcification ≥ 3 mm in width) have been associated with increased CAS complications. Other high risk CAS features include those that prolong catheter or guide wire manipulation in the aortic arch, make crossing a carotid stenosis more difficult, decrease the likelihood of successful deployment or retrieval of an embolic protection device (EPD), or make stent delivery or placement more difficult. Procedure volume for the operator and the catheterization laboratory team are critical elements in reducing the risk of the procedure. In this article, we help CAS operators better understand procedure risk to allow more intelligent case selection, further improving the outcomes of this emerging procedure.

Outcomes of damage control laparotomy with open abdomen management in the octogenarian population

BACKGROUND

Controversy surrounds the role of abbreviated laparotomy and open abdomen (OA) in the octogenarian population in the acute care surgery model based on concern that the initial insult, combined with its sequelae, is beyond the physiologic reserve of these patients. As the population ages further, this dilemma will arise more frequently, requiring the analysis of futility or utility of OA in this demographic.

METHODS

The institutional review board approval was obtained to analyze retrospectively patients aged 80 years or older with OA from 1997 to 2009. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate the effects that demographics, comorbidities, and clinical factors had on in-hospital mortality and overall survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (32 men and 35 women) were identified. Acute general surgery (including vascular procedures) was the most common indication for laparotomy (94%) with trauma a distant second (6%). Early definitive closure was obtained in 52% of patients with a 34% planned ventral hernia rate. Overall complication rate was 62% and overall in-hospital mortality was 37%. Multivariate analysis revealed congestive heart failure (odds ratio, 11.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-128.03) and acute renal failure (odds ratio, 11.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.00-69.12) correlated with in-hospital mortality. Of those surviving to hospital dismissal, 2-year survival was 66% with a 17-month median follow-up (range, 1-125 months).

CONCLUSION

There is utility in octogenarians undergoing aggressive surgical management that requires OA. These patients have high mortality rates, but long-term survival can be better than their peers with other chronic diseases if they survive the surgical insult. Patient selection should be based on preexisting comorbidities such as congestive heart failure and the development of acute renal failure. Despite the adequate long-term survival, most patients will leave the hospital with a hernia.

Stroke prevention: carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy

Revascularization of the extracranial carotid arteries is a commonly performed surgical procedure to prevent stroke. Open surgery (i.e., carotid endarterectomy [CEA]) is a well-established stroke prevention procedure but is being ‘challenged' by a less invasive percutaneous procedure (i.e., carotid artery stent [CAS] placement). Clinical trials comparing CAS and CEA for average-surgical-risk patients have demonstrated mixed results, whereas the data for CAS compared with CEA in high-surgical-risk patients have demonstrated non-inferiority. The impending Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) results will have a major impact on the utility of CAS relative to CEA in average-surgical-risk patients.

Carotid artery stent placement is safe in the very elderly (> or =80 years)

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stent (CAS) placement is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for stroke prevention. Clinical adoption of CAS depends on its safety and efficacy compared to CEA. There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the safety of CAS in the elderly. To address these safety concerns, we report our single-center 13-year CAS experience in very elderly (> or =80 years of age) patients.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2007, 816 CAS procedures were performed at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation. Very elderly patients, those > or =80 years of age, accounted for 126 (15%) of all CAS procedures. Independent neurologic examination was performed before and after the CAS procedure.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 82.9 +/- 2.9 years. Almost one-half (44%) were women and 40% were symptomatic from their carotid stenoses. One-third of the elderly patients met anatomic criteria for high surgical risk as their indication for CAS. The procedural success rate was 100% with embolic protection devices used in 50%. The 30-day major adverse coronary or cerebral events (MACCE) rate was 2.7% (n = 3) with all events occurring in the symptomatic patient group [death = 0.9% (n = 1), myocardial infarction = 0%, major (disabling) stroke = 0.9% (n = 1), and minor stroke = 0.9% (n = 1)].

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients, > or =80 years of age, may undergo successful CAS with a very low adverse event rate as determined by an independent neurological examination. We believe that careful case selection and experienced operators were keys to our success.

Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarian veterans: does age affect outcome? A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in octogenarians is controversial. Recent reports have examined this question in the general population, but little data exist on veterans. With the emergence of carotid artery stenting, we need to evaluate the role of CEA in treating elderly veterans with carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all CEAs performed between January 1995 and December 2004.

RESULTS

A total of 286 procedures were performed in 239 patients; 39 procedures were performed in 33 octogenarians, and 247 procedures were performed in 206 younger veterans. Both groups had similar preoperative comorbidities. There were no statistically significant differences between octogenarians and younger veterans for postoperative stroke (2% vs. 1%), death (0% vs. 1%), myocardial infarction (5% vs. 2%), length of stay (7 +/- 19 vs. 3 +/- 8 days), or 4-year survival (53% vs. 57%).

CONCLUSIONS

CEA can be safely performed in octogenarian veterans with outcomes similar to younger veterans.

Differential responsiveness of early- and late-passage endothelial cells to shear stress

BACKGROUND

The incidence of vascular disease increases with age. Because atherosclerosis and neointimal hyperplasia colocalize in areas of disturbed shear stress, the effects of orbital shear stress (SS) on endothelial cell proliferation, protein kinase B (Akt) activation, and functional activity were analyzed using a senescence model.

METHODS

Early- (p3 to 7) and late- (p28 to 32) passage bovine aortic endothelial cells were exposed to orbital SS (210 rpm) or static conditions (0 to 5 days). Cell proliferation was directly counted and confirmed with proliferating cell nuclear antigen reactivity. Phosphorylated and total Akt were assessed with Western blotting. Endothelial cell-induced smooth muscle cell migration was assessed with a Boyden chamber.

RESULTS

Late-passage endothelial cells demonstrated no increase in orbital SS stimulated proliferation compared with early-passage cells (P = .42). Late-passage endothelial cells demonstrated decreased Akt phosphorylation in response to SS compared with early passage cells (n = 6, P = .01). Late-passage cells induced 26% less smooth muscle cell migration than early-passage cells (n = 3, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Late-passage endothelial cells demonstrate decreased proliferation, Akt phosphorylation, and secretion of smooth muscle cell chemoattractants in response to orbital SS compared with early passage cells. These results suggest that late-passage endothelial cells respond to SS differently than early-passage cells and confirm the utility of the in vitro senescence model.

A Systematic Review of the Associations between Age and Sex and the Operative Risks of Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis have demonstrated that benefit is decreased in women, due partly to a high operative risk, which is independent of age. However, it is uncertain whether these trial-based observations are generalisable to routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all publications reporting data on the association between age and/or sex and procedural risk of stroke and/or death following CEA from 1980 to 2004.

RESULTS

62 eligible papers reported relevant data. Females had a higher rate of operative stroke and death (25 studies, OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.17-1.47, p < 0.001) than males, but no increase in operative mortality (15 studies, OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.81-0.86, p = 0.78). Compared with younger patients, operative mortality was increased at > or =75 years (20 studies, OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.07-1.68, p = 0.02), at age > or =80 years (15 studies, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.26-2.45, p < 0.001) and in older patients overall (35 studies, OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.26-1.78, p < 0.001). In contrast, risk of non-fatal stroke did not increase with age and so the combined perioperative risk was only slightly increased at age > or =75 years (21 studies, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.94-1.44, p = 0.06), at age > or =80 years (10 studies, OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.92-1.36, p = 0.34) and in older patients overall (36 studies, OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.04-1.31, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of age and sex on the operative risk of CEA in published case series are consistent with those observed in the trials. Operative risk of stroke is increased in women and operative mortality is increased in patients aged > or =75 years.

Cost Analysis of Carotid Endarterectomy: Is Age a Factor?

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in elderly patients. Our aim was to analyze and compare outcome and cost of CEA in both elderly and younger patient groups. A total of 125 consecutive patients who underwent CEA were examined retrospectively and grouped according to age (<80 years old, n = 95; and >or=80 years old, n = 30). The actual total costs and itemized costs were analyzed, and diagnosis-related group (DRG) code payor mix were identified. Patient demographics and risk factors were similar except for a greater incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the >or=80 group than in these <80 (43.3% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.05). Patients had similar minor complication rates; however, the >or=80 group had higher perioperative major complications (16.7% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01). There were no deaths and there was one perioperative stroke, which occurred in the <80 group. Mean length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and ICU admissions were greater in the >or=80 group. Cost figures were normalized to a base value of 10 US dollars to maintain proprietary data. Actual total costs of CEA were 131.50 US dollars for the >or=80 group and $100 for the <80 group (p < 0.001). Significant cost differences were found in ICU room costs, and costs for clinical laboratory, radiology imaging, other specialty consults, operating room, and ancillary services in the >or=80 group compared with the <80 group. These results show that the cost of CEA in the elderly is significantly greater than that for younger patients. This difference can be attributed to a greater number of major complications in the more elderly group, who require increased ICU stay, and thus require more clinical laboratory, radiology imaging, and specialty consult service resources. Consideration should be given for a DRG modifier code to increase hospital reimbursement for increased associated costs in elderly patients undergoing CEA.

Carotid Endarterectomy: Experience in 5425 Cases

From 1992 to December 2002, 3967 patients (2619 males; 1348 females) with a mean age of 68.4A years (range 32-92) underwent 5425 carotid endarterectomy (CE) procedures at our institute. Neurological history was positive for stroke in 1130 cases (21%) and for transient ischemic attack (TIA) in 2121 cases (39%). In 2174 cases (40%) patients were neurologically asymptomatic or presented nonspecific symptoms. Our current clinical protocol has been designed to optimize resources and reduce complications. Some of the major features, along with the respective percentages in this series, are as follows. Duplex scanning was performed at a validated laboratory as the principal preoperative exam (86.9%). Locoregional anesthesia and neurological monitoring were performed during carotid cross-clamping (96.3%). Selective shunting was carried out with a Javid shunt (10.7%). The choice of surgical technique was made according to carotid anatomy and cerebral tolerance of cross-clamping. Those used were a standard technique (now abandoned, 12.1%), synthetic patching (46.4%), and eversion endarterectomy (41.5%). Intraoperative completion arteriography was routinely performed for eversion endarterectomy and only in dubious cases with other techniques. The option of staying in an postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) was available (selective use, 2%). In uncomplicated cases, early discharge (after 1.5 postoperative days) was considered safe. The overall perioperative mortality was 0.37% (20/5425). Causes of death were myocardial infarction in seven cases, ischemic stroke in six cases, hemorrhagic stroke in five cases, respiratory failure caused by cervical hematoma in one case, and wound infection in one case. Perioperative neurological morbidity was 1.31% (71/5425); there were 43 major and 28 minor strokes. In conclusion, CE is effective for stroke prevention when there is significant symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, as low mortality and morbidity may be achieved in an experienced center. At our institute, the reduction of costs did not have negative consequences on the quality of the surgical care.

Routine preoperative carotid duplex scanning in patients undergoing open heart surgery: is it worthwhile?

It has been reported that carotid screening may be cost-effective in patient populations in which the prevalence of severe carotid stenosis exceeds 4.5%. In order to identify potential patient populations who might benefit from carotid screening, we examined the results of preoperative duplex scanning in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Between January 1995 and July 1998, 3708 patients (59% male, 41% female) underwent open heart surgery at our institution. Of these, 3081 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 364 underwent valve replacement (VR), and 263 underwent CABG and VR. The ages of these patients ranged from 40 years to 98 years (mean 68 +/- 11 years). The risk factors analyzed included hypertension (HTN), 59%; smoking (Smk), 53%; and diabetes (DM), 33%. Patients were divided into three groups according to their age. Group A consisted of the 835 patients who were < or = 60 years old, group B consisted of 2474 patients ranging from 61 years to 80 years old, and group C consisted of 399 patients who were > or = 81 years old. All patients underwent bilateral preoperative carotid duplex scans at an Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories (ICAVL)-accredited vascular laboratory. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-squared, Fisher's exact test, linear regression, and multivariate analysis. From our results we concluded that carotid screening is not recommended for patients under 60 years of age who are undergoing CABG unless they present with a minimum of two of the following major risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, or smoking. However, carotid screening is recommended for all patients undergoing open heart operations who are over the age of 60 years old, regardless of the absence of associated risk factors.

Changing characteristics of carotid endarterectomy

We have noted significant differences in terms of our preoperative work-up, length of stay, morbidity, and mortality of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) from findings reported in large published randomized clinical trials. To further investigate these differences, we have reviewed our recent experience. CEA has proved to be the most effective approach to avert stokes caused by significant atherosclerotic disease of the carotid bifurcation. Between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 1998, 552 patients underwent CEA at our institution. Forty percent were performed in symptomatic patients with stenotic lesions > 60% in diameter by duplex ultrasonography. The remainder were performed for asymptomatic lesions > 60% in diameter. No patient underwent contrast angiography. Fifty-two percent of the patients were males. The mean age was 74 +/- 8 years old. General anesthesia was used in 97% of the cases and regional block, in 3%. All patients underwent routine postoperative measurement of serum creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) isoenzymes. Patients were discharged when deemed clinically stable. The patients' follow-up visits at 1 week and at 3-5 months after the procedure (mean, 3.4 months) included a neurological exam and duplex exam. Patient results suggest that CEAs can be performed in the modern era without contrast arteriography. Most patients can be discharged on the first postoperative day. In addition, previously acceptable rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality should perhaps be revised to meet current standards. Contrary to the previous concept that most postoperative strokes are due to embolic phenomena, hyperperfusion syndrome played an increasingly important role in this review.

Factors predicting prolonged length of stay after carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Over the last several years, implementation of critical pathways in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy has decreased postoperative length of stay significantly. Discharge the day after surgery has become commonplace in many centers, including our own. Unfortunately, managed care may interpret this refinement as a standard of care and limit reimbursement or even disallow admissions extending beyond 1 day. We therefore examined our carotid registry to identify risk factors associated with postoperative length of stay exceeding 1 day.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy at our academic center from May 1996 through April 1999. Combined procedures and patients undergoing subsequent noncarotid-related procedures on those admissions were excluded. The charts were inspected for atherosclerosis risk factors, including sex and age, specific attending surgeon, side of the surgery, use of intravenous vasoactive drugs, actual preoperative blood pressure, and presence of neurologic symptoms or postoperative complications. Multiple regression analysis was performed on all collected variables. Statistical significance was inferred for P less than.05.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients met the study criteria and had complete, retrievable medical records. A mean postoperative length of stay of 1.65 +/- 0.08 days and a mean total length of stay of 2.17 +/- 0.14 days were observed. Fifty-seven percent of patients went home the day after surgery. There was a 1.6% stroke-mortality rate. Significant predictors of a prolonged stay, listed in order of decreasing importance on the basis of their calculated contribution to prolonging the postoperative length of stay, are as follows (P value; beta coefficient): postoperative complications (<.0001; 1.03), age > 79 years (.008; 0.547), diabetes mellitus (.011; 0.407), female sex (.007; 0.398), and intravenous vasodilator requirement (. 035; 0.382). Other atherosclerosis risk factors, prior neurologic symptoms, the postoperative use of vasopressors, and reoperative surgery did not contribute to extended length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Discharge on the first postoperative day is feasible in many, but not all, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Our data help define subsets of patients at risk for prolonged postoperative stay. Targeting these subsets for preoperative medical and social interventions may allow safe early discharge more frequently.

Outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: comparison of mortality defined by centralized VA Patient Treatment File data versus hospital-based chart review

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have been reported by individual Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs) and for the entire VA patient population.

PURPOSE

This study was done to determine whether outcomes defined using VA Patient Treatment File (PTF) data were comparable to those defined by direct chart review in those undergoing repair of intact AAA.

METHODS

Focused chart review was performed in all veterans undergoing such AAA repair in a sample of VAMCs (n = 5) for separate 1-year periods during fiscal years (FY) 1991-1993. A previous report of outcomes after AAA repair for all veterans in DRGs 110 and 111 during FY 1991-1993 was based on PTF data that were further analyzed by Patient Management Category (PMC) software. Outcomes after AAA repair were defined in a similar fashion using PTF data and PMC analysis in the same sample VAMCs for which direct chart review data were available. Outcomes defined by chart review were then compared to those based on PTF data.

RESULTS

Three of the 69 patients undergoing repair of intact AAA for which chart review data were available were assigned to DRGs other than 110 and 111 and, by definition, were not included in the PTF-derived database. Nine of 10 additional patients undergoing chart review were not identified as having undergone AAA repair by PMC software: 7 had procedure codes 39.25 instead of more standard AAA repair codes 38.34 or 38.44. Two additional patients with codes 38.64 or 38.66 were not identified as having undergone AAA repair by PMC software. The 10th patient not included in the PTF-derived database underwent additional operative procedures. Of the 13 patients missed by the combined PTF and PMC outcome analyses but identified by chart review, none died or had cardiac complications. One of these 13 patients had pulmonary complications based on chart review and PTF but was excluded by PMC analysis. There remained a total of 56 patients at the five sample VAMCs common to the PTF-derived and chart-derived databases identified as having undergone repair of intact AAA. There were two in-hospital deaths in these patients, and both were identified by each approach to outcome assessment. Four of these 56 patients had postoperative cardiac complications (ICD-9-CM code 997. 10) which were identified by both PTF and chart review. Postoperative pulmonary complications (ICD-9-CM code 997.30) were present in 4 of the 56 cases and were also identified by both PTF-based and chart-based outcome analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

All deaths as well as cardiac or respiratory complications identified by chart review at the study hospitals were also affirmed by the PTF. Due to study methodologies (which restricted analysis to those in DRGs 110 and 111 and which included secondary analyses of PTF data by PMC software), 19% of patients who underwent repair of intact AAA identified by hospital-based chart review were excluded from the PTF-based outcome analysis. Outcomes defined using large databases such as the VA PTF may be comparable to those defined by chart review if study methodologies permit. Discrepancies in outcome assessment between direct chart review and large database analysis in the present study were due to methodologies used, not to deficiencies, per se, in PTF data.