Effect of propranolol and nifedipine on maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice: individually and in combination

D-pinitol attenuates isoproterenol induced myocardial infarction by alleviating cardiac inflammation, oxidative stress and ultrastructural changes in Swiss Albino mice

Cardiovascular diseases are the most disturbing problems throughout the world. The side effects of existing drugs are continuously compelling the scientist to look for better options in terms of safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Our study is also a move in this direction. We have chosen D-pinitol to see its cardioprotective role in isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in Swiss Albino mice. Grouping was made by dividing mice into eight groups (n = 6). Group I - control; Group II - Isoproterenol (ISO) (150 mg/kg, i.p.); Group III - D-pinitol (PIN) (25 mg), Group IV - PIN (50 mg), Group V - PIN (100 mg) per kg per oral, respectively with ISO; Group VI - PIN _{per se} (100 mg D-pinitol only); Group VII - Propranolol (PRO) (20 mg/kg/oral) with ISO; and Group VIII - PRO _{per se} (20 mg/kg, p.o.). After 24 hrs of the last dose, the blood sample was collected for biochemical parameters, then mice were, euthanised through cervical dislocation under anesthesia and cardiac tissue was collected for biochemical, histopathological and ultrastructural evaluation. Administration of ISO in mice altered the level of antioxidant markers, cardiac injury markers and inflammatory markers, which were significantly restored towards normal by D-pinitol at the dose of 50 and 100 mg. 25 mg of D-pinitol dosage, did not produce significant cardio protection. The histopathological and ultrastructural analysis further confirmed these findings. Our study showed that D-pinitol significantly protected myocardial damage which was induced by ISO and reverted oxidative stress and inflammation considerably.

Effects of Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Antiepileptic Drug Action-A Critical Review of Experimental Findings

Severe cardiac arrhythmias developing in the course of seizures increase the risk of SUDEP (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy). Hence, epilepsy patients with pre-existing arrhythmias should receive appropriate pharmacotherapy. Concomitant treatment with antiarrhythmic and antiseizure medications creates, however, the possibility of drug–drug interactions. This is due, among other reasons, to a similar mechanism of action. Both groups of drugs inhibit the conduction of electrical impulses in excitable tissues. The aim of this review was the analysis of such interactions in animal seizure models, including the maximal electroshock (MES) test in mice, a widely accepted screening test for antiepileptic drugs.

Nebivolol attenuates the anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine and phenobarbital against the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

Background

Due to co-occurrence of seizures and cardiovascular disorders, nebivolol, a widely used selective β₁-blocker with vasodilatory properties, may be co-administered with antiepileptic drugs. Therefore, we wanted to assess interactions between nebivolol and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital in the screening model of tonic–clonic convulsions.

Methods

Seizure experiments were conducted in the electroconvulsive threshold and maximal electroshock tests in mice. The chimney test served as a method of assessing motor coordination, whereas long-term memory was evaluated in the computerized step-through passive-avoidance task. To exclude or confirm pharmacokinetic interactions, we measured brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs using the fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

Results

It was shown that nebivolol applied at doses 0.5–15 mg/kg did not raise the threshold for electroconvulsions. However, nebivolol at the dose of 15 mg/kg reduced the anti-electroshock properties of carbamazepine. The effect of valproate, phenytoin, and phenobarbital remained unchanged by combination with the β-blocker. Nebivolol significantly decreased the brain concentration of valproate, but did not affect concentrations of remaining antiepileptic drugs. Therefore, contribution of pharmacokinetic interactions to the final effect of the nebivolol/carbamazepine combination seems not probable. Nebivolol alone and in combinations with antiepileptic drugs did not impair motor performance in mice. Nebivolol alone did not affect long-term memory of animals, and did not potentiate memory impairment induced by valproate and carbamazepine.

Conclusions

This study indicates that nebivolol attenuated effectiveness of some antiepileptic drugs. In case the results are confirmed in clinical settings, this β-blocker should be used with caution in epileptic patients.

Managing aggression in epilepsy

Behavioural changes associated with epilepsy can be challenging for patients and clinicians. Evidence suggests an association between aggression and epilepsy that involves various neurophysiological and neurochemical disturbances. Anti-epileptics have variable effects on behaviour and cognition that need consideration. Early detection and careful consideration of history, symptomatology and possible common comorbid psychiatric disorders is essential. Appropriate investigations should be considered to aid diagnosis, including electroencephalogram (EEG), video EEG telemetry and brain imaging. Optimising treatment of epilepsy, treatment of psychiatric comorbidities and behavioural management can have a major positive effect on patients' recovery and well-being.

Learning Objectives

• Understand the epidemiology of aggression in epilepsy

• Comprehend the link between anti-epileptics and aggression, including the important role of pharmacodynamics

• Be aware of the pharmacological treatments available for managing aggressive behaviour in epilepsy

Sotalol enhances the anticonvulsant action of valproate and diphenylhydantoin in the mouse maximal electroshock model

BACKGROUND

Sotalol as a drug blocking β-receptors and potassium KCNH2 channels may interact with different substances that affect seizures. Herein, we present interactions between sotalol and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital.

METHODS

Effects of sotalol and antiepileptics alone on seizures were determined in the electroconvulsive threshold test, while interactions between sotalol and antiepileptic drugs were estimated in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Motor coordination and long-term memory were evaluated, respectively, in the chimney test and passive-avoidance task. Brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

RESULTS

Sotalol at doses up to 100mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Applied at doses 60-100mg/kg, sotalol potentiated the antielectroshock action of valproate, while at doses 80-100mg/kg that of phenytoin. Sotalol (up to 100mg/kg) did not affect the action of carbamazepine or phenobarbital in the maximal electroshock. Sotalol alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory in mice. Finally, sotalol did not change brain concentration of valproate and phenytoin, so pharmacokinetic interactions between the drugs are not probable.

CONCLUSIONS

As far as obtained data may be extrapolated into clinical conditions, sotalol may be considered as an arrhythmic drug that does not reduce the action of classical antiepileptic drugs and thereby can be used in epileptic patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Comparative behavioral and neurochemical analysis of phenytoin and valproate treatment on epilepsy induced learning and memory deficit: Search for add on therapy

Our previous work demonstrated, chronic epilepsy affects learning and memory of rodents along with peculiar neurochemical changes in discrete brain parts. Most commonly used antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin and sodium valproate) also worsen learning and memory in the patients with epilepsy. Therefore this study was designed to carry out comparison of behavioral and neurochemical changes with phenytoin and sodium valproate treatment in pentylenetetrazole-kindling induced learning and memory deficit to devise add on therapy for this menace. For the experimental epilepsy, animals were kindled using PTZ (35 mg/kg; i.p., at 48 ± 2 h intervals) and successful kindled animals were involved in the study. These kindled animals were treated with saline, phenytoin (30 mg/kg/day, i.p.) and sodium valproate (300 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for 20 days. These animals were challenged with PTZ challenging dose (35 mg/kg) on day 5, 10, 15 and 20 to evaluate the effect on seizure severity score on different days. Effect on learning and memory was evaluated using elevated plus maze and passive shock avoidance paradigm. On day 20, after behavioral evaluations, animals were sacrificed to analyze glutamate, GABA, norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, total nitrite level and acetylcholinesterase level in cortex and hippocampus. Behavioral evaluations suggested that phenytoin and sodium valproate treatment significantly reduced seizure severity in the kindled animals, while sodium valproate treatment controls seizures with least memory deficit in comparison to phenytoin. Neurochemical findings revealed that elevated cortical acetylcholinesterase level could be one of the responsible factors leading to memory deficit in phenytoin treated animals. However sodium valproate treatment reduced cortical acetylcholinesterase level and had least debilitating consequences on memory deficit. Therefore, attenuation of elevated AChE activity can be one of add-on approach for management of memory deficit associated with conventional AEDs.

β adrenergic blockade prevents cardiac dysfunction following status epilepticus in rats

Status epilepticus (SE) can result in temporary cardiac dysfunction in patients, characterized by reduced ejection fraction, decreased ventricular contractility, and alterations in electrical activity of the heart. Although reversible, the cardiac effects of seizures are acutely life threatening, and may contribute to the delayed mortality following SE. The precise mechanisms mediating acute cardiac dysfunctions are not known. These studies evaluated effects of self-sustaining limbic SE in rats on cardiac performance 24h following seizures, and determined if sympathetic nervous system activation during seizures contributed to cardiac dysfunction. Rats subjected to SE received either vehicle (saline) or the B1 adrenergic antagonist atenolol (AT) prior to and during 90 min of seizure activity. Control rats were similarly treated, except they did not undergo seizures. Twenty-four hours after SE, animals were anesthetized and catheterized for measurement of cardiac performance variables. Animals undergoing SE demonstrated significantly reduced cardiac output, decreased ventricular contractility and relaxation, increased blood pressure, and prolonged QT interval. However, heart rate was not altered. Treatment with AT prevented all changes in cardiac performance due to SE, and attenuated the increase in QT interval. These data demonstrate that SE in the rat results in cardiac dysfunction 24h following seizures, mediated by the sympathetic nervous system.

Psychiatric symptomatologies and disorders related to epilepsy and antiepileptic medications

INTRODUCTION

Psychiatric comorbidities (such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, inattention, obsession, personality traits, aggression and suicide) are frequent in patients with epilepsy and have a significant impact on medical management and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was performed in MEDLINE for epidemiological, longitudinal, prospective, double-blind clinical trial studies published between 1990 and 2011 using the following words: epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), behavioral/emotional/psychiatric comorbidities, suicide and aggression. In this review, the author discusses: i) the characterization and prevalence of behavioral disturbances associated with epilepsy, ii) variables correlated with behavioral comorbidities which include: psychosocial-, clinical- and treatment-related variables, iii) the complex mechanisms of behavioral comorbidities associated with epilepsy, which include both psychosocial (functional) and organic; the process of epileptogenesis, neuronal plasticity, abnormalities in hypothalamic-pituitary axis and neurotransmitters and pathways are fundamental determinants, iv) the negative psychotropic effects of AEDs and their mechanisms and v) the suggested biopsychosocial model of management (pharmacological and non-pharmacological).

EXPERT OPINION

The relationship between psychiatric disorders and epilepsy has relevant therapeutic implications which should be directed towards a comprehensive biopsychosocial approach that focuses on the whole person rather than simply on the disease process.

Epileptic seizure-induced hypertension and its prevention by calcium channel blockers: a real-time study in conscious telemetered rats

Epileptic seizures are accompanied by changes in autonomic function that in turn influence the cardiovascular system (hypertension and bradyarrhythmia). We have studied possible cardioprotective activity (during the ictal state in conscious animals) of valproic acid, nifedipine, and verapamil, alone and in combination, during pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizures. Telemetry system was used for recording EEG, blood pressure, and heart rate in conscious, freely moving rats during seizures. We observed that PTZ-induced seizures were accompanied by hypertension and bradyarrhythmia. Pretreatment with valproic acid did not block seizure-induced hypertension and bradyarrhythmia. Nifedipine alone and in combination with valproic acid blocked seizure-induced hypertension and bradyarrhythmia significantly. We also observed that pretreatment with verapamil alone and in combination with valproic acid did not block seizure-induced hypertension and bradyarrhythmia significantly. Our results suggest that pretreatment with nifedipine alone or in combination with valproic acid provides protection against seizure-induced hypertension and bradyarrhythmia.

Development of aDrosophilaseizure model forin vivohigh-throughput drug screening

An important application of model organisms in neurological research has been to identify and characterise therapeutic approaches for epilepsy, a recurrent seizure disorder that affects > 1% of the human population. Proconvulsant-treated rodent models have been widely used for antiepileptic drug discovery and development, but are not suitable for high-throughput screening. To generate a genetically tractable model that would be suitable for large-scale, high-throughput screening for antiepileptic drug candidates, we characterized a Drosophila chemical treatment model using the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin. This proconvulsant, delivered to Drosophila larvae via simple feeding methods suitable for automated screening, generated robust generalised seizures with lethality occurring at doses between 0.3 and 0.5 mg/mL. Electrophysiological analysis of CNS motor neuron output in picrotoxin-treated larvae revealed generalised seizures within minutes of drug exposure. At subthreshold doses for seizure induction, picrotoxin produced an increased frequency of motor neuron action potential bursting, indicating that CNS GABAergic transmission regulates patterned activity. Mutants in the Drosophila Rdl GABA(A) receptor are resistant to picrotoxin, confirming that seizure induction occurs via a conserved GABA(A) receptor pathway. To validate the usefulness of this model for in vivo drug screening, we identified several classes of neuroactive antiepileptic compounds in a pilot screen, including phenytoin and nifedipine, which can rescue the seizures and lethal neurotoxicity induced by picrotoxin. The well-defined actions of picrotoxin in Drosophila and the ease with which compounds can be assayed for antiseizure activity makes this genetically tractable model attractive for high-throughput in vivo screens to identify novel anticonvulsants and seizure susceptibility loci.

Anticonvulsant profile and mechanism of action of propranolol and its two enantiomers

The anticonvulsant properties of the ss-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol and its two enantiomers were examined in various screening tests in order to characterize the anticonvulsant profile as well as the possible molecular mechanism of action. These compounds dose-dependently raised the threshold for tonic electroshock seizures in mice and were effective in the traditional maximal electroshock test (ED (50)s 15- 20 mg kg (-1)i.p.). In combination with clinically used antiepileptics, the anticonvulsant effectiveness of the latter was significantly increased. In the pentylenetetrazol (85 mg kg (-1)s.c.) seizure threshold test, ( +/-)- and ( +)-propranolol were not effective in preventing clonic seizures. In unrestrained rats with chronically implanted electrodes in the dorsal hippocampus, propranolol and its ( +)-enantiomer equieffectively reduced the duration of electrically-evoked hippocampal afterdischarges (10 and 20 mg kg (-1)i.p.) and raised the focal stimulation threshold (20 mg kg (-1)i.p.). In amygdala-kindled rats, both drugs ( >or= 10 mg kg (-1)i.p.) reduced the seizure severity from stage 5 (generalized clonic-tonic) to stage 3 (unilateral forelimb) seizures. Furthermore, whole-cell patch-clamp experiments showed that ( +)- as well as ( -)-propranolol ( 10(-6)to 10(-4)M) depressed the fast inward sodium current in a concentration- and use-dependent manner in cultured rat cardiomyocytes and inhibited picrotoxin-induced burst firing activity of mouse spinal cord neurones in culture. In conclusion, propranolol and its two enantiomers have anticonvulsant effects in models for generalized tonic-clonic and complex partial seizures which may be accounted for by the sodium channel blocking and not by the ss-adrenoceptor blocking activity.

Influence of some beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the anticonvulsant potency of antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

The two enantiomers of propranolol antagonize generalized tonic-clonic seizures in DBA/2 mice with the (-)-enantiomer being about 1.5 times more potent than the (+)-enantiomer. Metoprolol was less active and atenolol was unable to affect audiogenic seizures. In combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs, both propranolol enantiomers tested in doses not affecting the occurrence of audiogenic seizures increased the anticonvulsant activity of diazepam, phenobarbital, valproate and lamotrigine and tended to increase that of carbamazepine and phenytoin. The effect was more pronounced with the (-)-enantiomer. This increase was associated with an enhancement of motor impairment, however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of the antiepileptic drugs with both propranolol enantiomers was more favourable than the combination with saline alone. Metoprolol was also able to decrease the ED(50) values of the antiepileptic drugs, whereas atenolol showed no effects. Since neither enantiomer of propranolol significantly influenced the total and free plasma levels of the antiepileptics, pharmacokinetic interactions are not likely. In addition, (+)- and (-)-propranolol did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the antiepileptics tested. In conclusion, both enantiomers of propranolol and metoprolol showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when co-administered with some conventional antiepileptic drugs, most notably diazepam, phenobarbital, lamotrigine and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.