Mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in patients on d,l-sotalol for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Use of d,l-sotalol for rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has raised safety concerns. Previous randomized studies are few and not designed for mortality outcome.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidences of mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in AF patients treated with d,l-sotalol for rhythm control vs matched control patients treated with cardioselective beta-blockers.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included AF patients from the Swedish National Patient Registry (2006-2017) who underwent rhythm control after a second cardioversion. Incidence rates (IRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for mortality and a composite endpoint of cardiac arrest/death and ventricular arrhythmias were calculated for the overall cohort and a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort of d,l-sotalol vs beta-blocker treatment.

RESULTS

Among patient treated with d,l-sotalol (n = 4987) and beta-blocker (n = 27,078) (mean follow-up 458 days), all-cause mortality was lower in patients treated with d,l-sotalol: IR 1.21; 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.52 vs 2.42 (2.26-2.60) deaths per 100 patient-years; aHR 0.66 (0.52-0.83). The difference in mortality persisted in the propensity score matched comparison (n = 4953 in each group): aHR 0.63 (0.48-0.86). No differences were observed in the composite outcome: IR in propensity cohorts 2.13 (1.78-2.52) vs 2.07 (1.73-2.53) events per 100 years; aHR 1.01 (0.78-1.29).

CONCLUSION

There was no excess mortality with d,l-sotalol compared with cardioselective beta-blockers in patients undergoing rhythm control treatment for AF after a second cardioversion. Our results indicate that the risk associated with d,l-sotalol treatment for AF can be mitigated by careful patient selection and strict adherence to follow-up protocols.

Adsorption of Individual and Mixtures of β-Blockers and Copper in Soils and Sediments

The (bio)availability of pharmaceuticals at solid/water interfaces is governed by their sorption, which determines their concentrations in groundwaters and surface waters in contact with biota, and can be affected by the presence of other contaminants such as metallic trace elements likely to compete for adsorption sites and form complexes with pharmaceuticals. We studied the adsorption of the pharmaceuticals propranolol and sotalol-two β-blockers-on one soil and one sediment using batch experiments to assess their (bio)availability. The influence of contact time, pH, and concentration was studied. As in the real environment these contaminants are not alone but in mixtures, and they were studied alone, simultaneously added, and in the presence of Cu²⁺ , which is known to form coordination complexes with propranolol and sotalol, but their presence in mixtures did not alter their adsorption properties. Sotalol was more mobile in water and thus more bioavailable for organisms than propranolol. The mobility in surface waters of both β-blockers and thus their bioavailabity for organisms is more important than their risk of transfer to groundwater during rainwater infiltration and to surface water due to runoff. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2700-2707. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Socioeconomic status and public health in Australia: A wastewater-based study

Analysis of untreated municipal wastewater is recognized as an innovative approach to assess population exposure to or consumption of various substances. Currently, there are no published wastewater-based studies investigating the relationships between catchment social, demographic, and economic characteristics with chemicals using advanced non-targeted techniques. In this study, fifteen wastewater samples covering 27% of the Australian population were collected during a population Census. The samples were analysed with a workflow employing liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry and chemometric tools for non-target analysis. Socioeconomic characteristics of catchment areas were generated using Geospatial Information Systems software. Potential correlations were explored between pseudo-mass loads of the identified compounds and socioeconomic and demographic descriptors of the wastewater catchments derived from Census data. Markers of public health (e.g., cardiac arrhythmia, cardiovascular disease, anxiety disorder and type 2 diabetes) were identified in the wastewater samples by the proposed workflow. They were positively correlated with descriptors of disadvantage in education, occupation, marital status and income, and negatively correlated with descriptors of advantage in education and occupation. In addition, markers of polypropylene glycol (PPG) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) related compounds were positively correlated with housing and occupation disadvantage. High positive correlations were found between separated and divorced people and specific drugs used to treat cardiac arrhythmia, cardiovascular disease, and depression. Our robust non-targeted methodology in combination with Census data can identify relationships between biomarkers of public health, human behaviour and lifestyle and socio-demographics of whole populations. Furthermore, it can identify specific areas and socioeconomic groups that may need more assistance than others for public health issues. This approach complements important public health information and enables large-scale national coverage with a relatively small number of samples.

Influence of baseline QTc on sotalol-induced prolongation of ventricular repolarization in men and women

The extent of sotalol-induced QTc prolongation on the electrocardiogram, is variable among subjects and influenced by sex. However, the influence of baseline QTc on the extent of drug-induced QTc prolongation remains unclear. This was studied around peak plasma concentration in a large cohort of 376 healthy male and 614 healthy female subjects who received 80 mg of sotalol orally. Baseline QTc was 379±16ms in men and 393±15ms in women (p<0.0001). The change in QTc from baseline was highly variable among both sexes and was greater in women than in men (26.5±13.2 vs.13.0±10.8ms; <0.0001). The slope of the regression line between QTc on sotalol and baseline QTc did not significantly differ from unity in men and in women indicating that the extent of QTc prolongation with sotalol was not influenced by baseline QTc. Assessing QTc after administration of an I_Kr blocker may be more important than measuring a baseline QTc.

Sotalol versus amiodarone for postoperative junctional tachycardia after congenital heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) is a common arrhythmia after congenital heart disease surgery. There is variability in the choice of antiarrhythmic therapy, with amiodarone used commonly. Intravenous (IV) sotalol is a newly available agent that may be useful for JET.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IV sotalol for postoperative JET and compare outcomes with IV amiodarone.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study of all patients who received IV sotalol or IV amiodarone for postoperative JET at Texas Children's Hospital from December 15, 2015, to December 15, 2020. Data included antiarrhythmic efficacy, hemodynamics, and adverse effects. Successful JET control was defined as a decrease in JET rate to <170 beats/min (or decrease by >20%), or conversion to sinus rhythm, with persistent control over 24 hours without requiring alternative antiarrhythmics or mechanical support.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (median age 71 days; interquartile range 17-221 days) received IV amiodarone (n = 20 [62%]) or IV sotalol (n = 12 [38%]) for postoperative JET. Amiodarone was successful in treating JET in 75% of cases; sotalol was successful in 83%. The JET rate decreased faster over the first 90 minutes after a sotalol bolus (25 beats/min per hour) than after an amiodarone bolus (8 beats/min per hour) (P < .01); no heart rate difference was seen after 24 hours. Amiodarone infusion was discontinued early because of hypotension/bradycardia in 2 patients; this was not required in any patients receiving sotalol.

CONCLUSION

For children with postoperative JET, both IV sotalol and amiodarone are safe and efficacious. IV sotalol may lead to a faster improvement in heart rate.

The proarrhythmic effects of hypothermia in atria isolated from 5-HT4-receptor-overexpressing mice

We investigated whether hypothermia would be arrhythmogenic in mice that overexpress the human 5-HT₄ receptor only in their cardiac myocytes (5-HT₄-TG). Contractile studies were performed in isolated, electrically driven (1 Hz) left and spontaneously beating right atrial preparations of 5-HT₄-TG and littermate wild-type control mice (WT). Hypothermia (23 °C) decreased the force of contraction in the mouse right and left atrial preparations. Moreover, the concentration-dependent positive inotropic effects of 5-HT were blunted but still shifted to lower 5-HT concentrations in the left 5-HT₄-TG atria in hypothermia compared to normothermia (37 °C). Furthermore, hypothermia increased the incidence of right atrial arrhythmias in 5-HT₄-TG more than in WT mice. In contrast, at 37 °C, lowering the potassium concentration from 5.2 to 2.0 mM also induced arrhythmias in the right atrium, but with a similar incidence in WT and 5-HT₄-TG mice. In contrast, 10 μM d,l-sotalol and 300 μM erythromycin did not induce arrhythmias. Hypothermia was accompanied by the increased expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in WT but not in 5-HT₄-TG mice. We concluded that without the stimulation of 5-HT₄-receptors by exogenous agonists, a simple temperature reduction can increase arrhythmias in 5-HT₄-TG mice. It is tempting to speculate that in human patients, 5-HT₄ receptors might contribute to potentially deadly hypothermia-induced arrhythmias.

Naturally occurring torsades de pointes and QT interval prolongation in a domestic cat

A 10-year-old male American Shorthair cat was presented after a witnessed syncopal event. A Holter monitor demonstrated a long QT interval and revealed a rhythm characteristic of torsades de pointes (TdP) coincident with a bout of syncope. On subsequent Holter monitor recordings, sotalol did not prolong the QT interval further and did not reduce the severity of the underlying ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but no TdP was identified. When another syncopal event occurred, sotalol was discontinued, and oral amiodarone and magnesium were started. This resulted in improvement in the ventricular tachyarrhythmia. No syncopal events occurred in the ensuing 3 months, but the cat died of an unrelated disease shortly after. This is the first report of naturally occurring torsades de pointes in a domestic cat.

Sotalol does not interfere with the antielectroshock action of selected second-generation antiepileptic drugs in mice

Background

Due to blocking β-receptors, and potassium KCNH2 channels, sotalol may influence seizure phenomena. In the previous study, we have shown that sotalol potentiated the antielectroshock action of phenytoin and valproate in mice.

Materials and methods

As a continuation of previous experiments, we examined the effect of sotalol on the action of four chosen second-generation antiepileptic drugs (oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, pregabalin, and topiramate) against the maximal electroshock in mice. Undesired effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor impairment) and step-through passive-avoidance task (long-term memory deficits). Finally, brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, while those of sotalol by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Results

Sotalol at doses of up to 100 mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Applied at doses of 80–100 mg/kg, sotalol did not affect the antielectroshock action of oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, pregabalin, or topiramate. Sotalol alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory. Finally, sotalol significantly decreased the brain concentrations of lamotrigine and increased those of oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Pharmacokinetic interactions, however, did not influence the final antielectroshock effects of above-mentioned drug combinations. On the other hand, the brain concentrations of sotalol were not changed by second-generation antiepileptics used in this study.

Conclusion

Sotalol did not reduce the antielectroshock action of four second-generation antiepileptic drugs examined in this study. Therefore, this antidepressant drug should not interfere with antiseizure effects of lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, and topiramate in patients with epilepsy. To draw final conclusions, our preclinical data should still be confirmed in other experimental models and clinical conditions.

Model-Informed Development of Sotalol Loading and Dose Escalation Employing an Intravenous Infusion

BACKGROUND

Sotalol is often employed to prevent recurrence of symptomatic atrial flutter/atrial fibrillation. Because sotalol can prolong the QT interval excessively causing ventricular arrhythmias, a 3-day in-hospital loading or dose escalation period is mandated with oral administration in the product label for patient safety. In patients with normal renal function, 3 days (five oral doses) are required to obtain steady state maximum sotalol concentration, which results in maximum QT prolongation. The aim of this study is to develop an intravenous to oral loading regime for sotalol therapy that reduces the 3-day in-hospital initiation or dose escalation with oral administration to 1 day without compromising patient safety.

METHODS

Using model-informed drug development techniques, simulations were developed for initiation and dose escalation of sotalol therapy by employing an intravenous loading dose followed by oral sotalol administrations.

RESULTS

In patients with normal renal function, an initial 1-h loading dose of intravenous sotalol followed by two oral doses in 24 h has been developed permitting attainment of three maximum serum concentrations reflecting maximum QT prolongation in a 1-day observation period. Dosing regimens for patients with impaired renal function are also developed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with normal renal function, using an intravenous loading dose followed by oral administrations permits safe initiation or dose escalation of sotalol in 1 day instead of the 3-day dosing regimen with oral administration.

Dynamic features of cardiac vector as alternative markers of drug-induced spatial dispersion

INTRODUCTION

The abnormal amplification of ventricular repolarization dispersion (VRD) has long been linked to proarrhythmia risk. Recently, the measure of VRD through electrocardiogram intervals has been strongly questioned. The search for an efficient and non-invasive surrogate marker of drug-induced dispersion effects constitute an urgent research challenge.

METHODS

Herein, drug-induced ventricular dispersion is generated by d-Sotalol supply in an In-vitro rabbit heart model. A cilindrical chamber simulates the thorax and a multi-electrode net is used to obtain spatial electrocardiographic signals. Cardiac vector dynamics is captured by novel velocity cardiomarkers obtained by quaternion methods. Through statistical analysis and machine learning technics, we compute potential dispersion markers that could define proarrhythmic risk.

RESULTS

The cardiomarkers with the greatest statistical significance, both obtained from the electrical cardiac vector, were: the QT_ω, which is the difference between first and last maxima of angular velocity and λ21_v^T, the roundness of linear velocity. When comparing with the performance of the current standards (89%), this pair was able to correctly separate 21 out of 22 experiments achieving a performance of 95%. Moreover, the QT_ω computes in a much more robust basis the QT interval, the current index for drug regulation.

DISCUSSION

These velocity markers circumvent the problems of accuratelly finding the fiducial points such as the always tricky T-wave end. Given the high performance they achieved, it is provided a promising outcome for future applications to the detection of anomalous changes of heterogeneity that may be useful for the purposes of torsadogenic toxicity studies.

Screen printed carbon electrode sensor with thiol graphene quantum dots and gold nanoparticles for voltammetric determination of solatol

This work, a highly selective and sensitive sensor is described for voltammetric determination of the sotalol (SOT). The dual actions of sotalol lead to reductions in the automaticity of myocardial cells and in conduction through the atrioventricular node. Drug analysis has an extensive impact on public health. The molecularly imprinted sensor was constructed by modifying a screen printed carbon electrode (SPCE) with thiol graphene quantum dots (GQD-SH) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Under optimal conditions the nanotools has a dynamic range that covers the 0.1-250 μM SOT concentration range, and the detection limit is 0.035 μM. This is lower than any of the previously reported methods. The MIP-sensor also exhibited excellent selectivity, good stability and adequate reproducibility for the detection of the SOT over its structural analogs. The prepared sensor was successfully applied to the measurement of SOT in various real samples including tablet and human blood serum.

Safety of Twice Daily Sotalol in Patients with Renal Impairment: A Single Center, Retrospective Review

Background

The class III antiarrhythmic sotalol is renally eliminated with a dose-related propensity to cause adverse drug reactions (ADR) potentially leading to life-threatening arrhythmias. Although product labeling recommends once daily dosing in patients with renal impairment, twice daily dosing is commonly utilized. This study evaluates the safety of this practice.

Methods

This retrospective, observational study examined renally impaired patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter admitted for sotalol initiation from July 1, 2012 - December 31, 2014, then for up to 20 months after initiation. Primary endpoints included rates of ADR and therapy changes due to ADR. Secondary endpoints included therapy changes due to arrhythmia recurrence, admissions due to arrhythmia recurrence, and therapy changes for any cause.

Results

Analysis included 134 patients with an average creatinine clearance of 51 ml/min, followed over a median of 170 days. Length of stay averaged 3 days withADR occurring in 53.7% of patients, most commonly QT prolongation or bradycardia. Therapy change due to ADR occurred in 45.5% of patients (n=61). Therapy change due to arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 23.1% (n=31), admission due to arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 24.6% (n=33), and therapy change for any cause occurred in 74.6% (n=100).

Conclusion

Initiating sotalol twice daily in renally impaired patients results in ADR and therapy change rates consistent with rates seen in clinical practice for non-renally impaired patients, with minimal length of stay.This practice may be reasonable when initiated in the acute care setting with subsequent outpatient monitoring, however further study is needed.

Early experience with intravenous sotalol in children with and without congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmias are common in the pediatric population. In patients unable to take oral medications or in need of acute therapy, options of intravenous (IV) antiarrhythmic medications are limited. Recently IV sotalol has become readily available, but experience in children is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience with the use of IV sotalol in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all pediatric patients receiving IV sotalol was performed. Patient demographic characteristics, presence of congenital heart disease, arrhythmia type, efficacy of IV sotalol use, and adverse effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (26 (55%) male and 24 (51%) with congenital heart disease) received IV sotalol at a median age of 2.05 years (interquartile range 0.07-10.03 years) and a median weight of 12.8 kg (interquartile range 3.8-34.2 kg), and 13 (28%) received IV sotalol in the acute postoperative setting. Supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in 40 patients (85%) and ventricular tachycardia in 7 (15%). Among 24 patients receiving IV sotalol for an active arrhythmia, acute termination was achieved in 21 (88%). Twenty-three patients received IV sotalol as maintenance therapy for recurrent arrhythmias owing to inability to take oral antiarrhythmic medications; 19 (83%) were controlled with sotalol monotherapy. No patient required discontinuation of IV sotalol secondary to adverse effects, proarrhythmia, or QT prolongation.

CONCLUSION

IV sotalol is an effective antiarrhythmic option for pediatric patients and may be an excellent agent for acute termination of active arrhythmias. It was well tolerated, with no patient requiring discontinuation secondary to adverse effects.

Efficacy and adverse effects of sotalol in adults with congenital heart disease

INTRODUCTION

Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are predisposed to arrhythmias, which can often be refractory to medical therapy. Sotalol is an attractive alternative antiarrhythmic to amiodarone in this younger patient population, given the latter's toxicity profile, but it may have proarrhythmic effects. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of sotalol in adults with CHD.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed our adult CHD database for all patients ≥16 years old, with moderate to highly complex defects, who were prescribed sotalol between 2000 and 2017. Efficacy in treating the clinical arrhythmia was assessed as complete, partial or failure. Adverse effects, including proarrhythmia, were documented.

RESULTS

Sotalol was prescribed in 82 of 902 adult CHD patients reviewed (9%). The mean age at sotalol commencement was 31.8 ± 13.1 years, with a median time on sotalol of 2.8 years. The average prescribed dose was 122 ± 51 mg/daily. Sotalol was completely effective in 48% (n = 39), partially effective in 46% (n = 38) and failed to control the clinical arrhythmia in 6% (n = 5). Fifteen patients (18%) discontinued sotalol due to a side effect, most commonly fatigue or dyspnoea. No episodes of torsades de pointes or sudden cardiac death were observed. Significant bradycardia related to sotalol occurred in 13% (n = 11, with permanent pacing implemented in 4), and was associated with Fontan anatomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In moderate to highly complex adult CHD, sotalol was reasonably effective and safe in low doses. Side effects limiting treatment were typically non-life-threatening, with significant bradycardia related to sotalol more likely in Fontan patients.

The Use of Intravenous Sotalol in Cardiac Arrhythmias

Sotalol is a non-selective beta-adrenergic blocking agent without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. It has the additional unique property of producing pronounced prolongation of the cardiac action potential duration. Sotalol therapy has been indicated for the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, refractory life threatening ventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation/flutter. Until recently, sotalol was only available in the oral form, however, it was approved for intravenous administration by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The current recommendations are for sotalol 75-150mg to be administered intravenously over 5hours. This rate of administration does not reflect the majority of the research that has been performed with regards to intravenous sotalol. Also, the safety of intravenous bolus dosing of 100mg over 1 and 5minutes has previously been demonstrated. The antiarrhythmic action of sotalol depends on its ability to prolong refractoriness in the nodal and extra nodal tissue. Hence, by giving a lower dose over a long duration, patients may not necessarily benefit from its anti-arrhythmic potential. The purpose of this article is to review the research that has been conducted with regards to dosage and safety of intravenous sotalol, its electrophysiological effects and finally the spectrum of arrhythmias in which it has been used to date.

Safety and Efficacy of Inpatient Initiation of Dofetilide versus Sotalol for atrial fibrillation

Background

We sought to investigate and compare the safety and efficacy of two commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs, Dofetilide (DF) and Sotalol (SL), during inpatient drug initiation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We performed a single center retrospective study of consecutive patients, admitted for initiation of either DF or SL, for AF between 2012 and 2015. Rates of successful cardioversion, QT interval prolongation, adverse events and drug discontinuations were calculated and compared. A two-tailed p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 378 patients, 298 (78.8%) received DF and 80 (21.2%) SL, mean age was 64 ± 11 years, 90% were Caucasians and 66% were males. Among the patients who remained in AF upon admission (DF: 215/298 (72%) vs. SL: 48/80 (60%)), no significant differences were noted in pharmacological cardioversion rates (DF: 125/215(58%) vs. SL: 30/48 (62.5%); p = 0.58). Baseline QTc was similar between the groups, with higher dose dependent QTc prolongation with DF (472.25± 31.3 vs. 458± 27.03; p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in the rates of adverse events such as bradycardia (7.4% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.26), Torsades de pointes (1.3% vs. 1.2%; p = 1.00), and drug discontinuation (9.0% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.47) between the two groups.

Intravenous sotalol use in a complex critically ill child: balancing the systems in choosing antiarrhythmic medication

In critically ill children, multi-organ-system disease can influence the choice of antiarrhythmic medication. Intravenous therapy is often necessary. There is a scarcity of paediatric critical-care cases demonstrating the dosing, monitoring, and efficacy of intravenous sotalol. This case demonstrates the effective use of intravenous sotalol in an adolescent with renal, hepatic, and haematological dysfunctions.

Sotalol enhances the anticonvulsant action of valproate and diphenylhydantoin in the mouse maximal electroshock model

BACKGROUND

Sotalol as a drug blocking β-receptors and potassium KCNH2 channels may interact with different substances that affect seizures. Herein, we present interactions between sotalol and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital.

METHODS

Effects of sotalol and antiepileptics alone on seizures were determined in the electroconvulsive threshold test, while interactions between sotalol and antiepileptic drugs were estimated in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Motor coordination and long-term memory were evaluated, respectively, in the chimney test and passive-avoidance task. Brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

RESULTS

Sotalol at doses up to 100mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Applied at doses 60-100mg/kg, sotalol potentiated the antielectroshock action of valproate, while at doses 80-100mg/kg that of phenytoin. Sotalol (up to 100mg/kg) did not affect the action of carbamazepine or phenobarbital in the maximal electroshock. Sotalol alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory in mice. Finally, sotalol did not change brain concentration of valproate and phenytoin, so pharmacokinetic interactions between the drugs are not probable.

CONCLUSIONS

As far as obtained data may be extrapolated into clinical conditions, sotalol may be considered as an arrhythmic drug that does not reduce the action of classical antiepileptic drugs and thereby can be used in epileptic patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Predictors of Pharmacological Therapy of Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia in Children

Ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) is a relatively common type of supraventricular tachycardia in the pediatric population, and it can be resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs and lead to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) if not properly managed. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of the response to pharmacological therapy in children with EAT. From January 2009 to April 2014, 115 children were admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of EAT and placed on antiarrhythmic drugs. We examined the clinical history, response to therapy, and follow-up of the children. The incidence of TIC secondary to EAT was 22.6% (n = 26) in children. Incessant EAT accounted for 44.3% of all patients. Control of EAT with antiarrhythmic therapy was achieved in 73.9% (n = 85) of the children. The combination of sotalol and propafenone performed well in controlling EAT in children [complete control in 35 (49.3%) of 71]. The mean time of conversion to sinus rhythm was 24 days, and the mean duration of therapy was 11 months in children with resolution. Multivariate predictors of the control of EAT were age at presentation (OR 0.289, P = 0.038) and tachycardia type (OR 0.276, P = 0.006). TIC occurs in 22.6% of children with EAT. Incessant EAT is more frequently complicated by TIC. Independent factors associated with a good response to pharmacological therapy include a younger age at presentation and non-incessant tachycardia in children with EAT.

Sotalol

Sotalol is effective for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contractions, and supraventricular tachycardia. Racemic (DL) sotalol inhibits the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current. There is a near linear relationship between sotalol dosage and QT interval prolongation. However, in dose ranging trials in patients with AF, low-dose sotalol was not more effective than placebo. Orally administered sotalol has a bioavailability of nearly 100%. The only significant drug interactions are the need to avoid or limit use of concomitant drugs that cause QT prolongation, bradycardia, and/or hypotension.

Sotalol versus Amiodarone in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

The availability of intravenous (IV) Sotalol has equalized the treatment options since both amiodarone and sotalol are available in both IV and oral formulations. A review of the efficacy of sotalol as compared to amiodarone both for conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm (NSR) following cardiac surgery was undertaken. Standard methods of meta-analysis were employed. Full text publications of clinical trials written in English that compared the efficacy of sotalol to amiodarone were included in the analysis. For the conversion of AF to NSR, five studies were found eligible for the analysis. Two studies clinically compared sotalol to amiodarone for the maintenance of NSR after cardiac surgery. The common relative success of sotalol was 0.947 (95Cl: 0.837 to 1.071, P = 0.385), revealing essentially no differences in efficacy for conversion between amiodarone and sotalol. The average conversion rate was 47% with sotalol and 52% with amiodarone. The conversion rates were lower for persistent AF (sotalol 22% and amiodarone 27%), while greatest for recent onset AF (88% sotalol and 77% for amiodarone). The risk of developing post-operative atrial fibrillation was practically the same in both regimes, relative risk = 1.214 (95% CI: 0.815-1.808, p=0.339). In summary, sotalol and amiodarone are equally effective in AF conversion and maintenance of NSR post-cardiac surgery.

Reduction over time of QTc prolongation in patients with sotalol after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Sotalol is recommended to prevent relapse of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion (CV). Sotalol prolongs the action potential by blocking the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current, which results in corrected QT (QTc) prolongation on the electrocardiogram. Pronounced QTc prolongation may lead to proarrhythmias and sudden death.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the dynamics of the QTc interval during the week after CV in patients treated with sotalol compared with patients treated with a β-blocker.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective CV for persistent atrial fibrillation and maintained sinus rhythm for 1 week were included prospectively. All patients were on the highest tolerable stable dose of metoprolol or sotalol. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were recorded 1 hour and 1 week after CV.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients on sotalol and 104 on metoprolol were included; clinical characteristics between groups were comparable. One hour after CV, the QTc interval was significantly longer in sotalol-treated patients than in metoprolol-treated patients (465 ± 25 ms vs 423 ± 30 ms; P ≤ .0001). After 1 week, the QTc interval was reduced by -20.3 ± 24 ms in sotalol-treated patients (P ≤ .001); no such effect was seen in metoprolol-treated patients (-2.5 ± 18 ms; P = 0.28). The heart rate was stable during the week in both groups. In multivariate analysis of sotalol-treated patients, factors contributing to pronounced reduction in the QTc interval were longer QTc interval after CV and renal function.

CONCLUSION

The QTc interval is significantly reduced during the week after CV to sinus rhythm in sotalol-treated patients. This provides insight into the increased risk of proarrhythmias in the immediate time period after CV.

Foetal tachyarrhythmia treatment remains challenging even if the vast majority of cases have a favourable outcome

AIM

The optimal treatment for foetal tachyarrhythmia remains controversial, and this study aimed to fill this gap in the knowledge.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of foetal tachyarrhythmia diagnosed at two tertiary foetal cardiology centres in Sweden from 1990 to 2012.

RESULTS

Of the 153 cases, 28% had atrial flutter (AF), 63% had atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and 9% had other mechanisms. Hydrops was present in 45, less frequently in AF than in AVRT. Transplacental treatment was commenced in 99 and the rhythm normalised in two-thirds, without any significant difference in cardioversion rates between AF and AVRT cases or nonhydropic and hydropic foetuses. Sotalol treatment had a higher cardioversion rate than digoxin in AVRT (63% versus 33%, p < 0.05) but not in AF (57% versus 56%). Two or more drugs were used in 38%. Neonatal survival was 100% in nonhydropic and 84% in hydropic cases. After a median of eight years, 11/134 patients still had arrhythmias, one had died due to arrhythmia and another had undergone cardiac transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Transplacental treatment was frequently insufficient to obtain cardioversion in nonhydropic and hydropic foetuses, but all nonhydropic cases had favourable outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to optimise the treatment of cases with hydrops.

Effects of ranolazine on torsades de pointes tachycardias in a healthy isolated rabbit heart model

PURPOSE

Torsades de pointes (TdP) tachycardias are triggered, polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias arising from early afterdepolarizations (EADs) and increased dispersion of repolarization. Ranolazine is a new agent which reduces pathologically elevated late INa but also IKr . Aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ranolazine in a validated isolated Langendorff-perfused rabbit heart model.

METHODS

TdP was reproducibly induced with d-sotalol (10(-4)  mol/L) and low potassium (K) (1.0 mmol/L for 5 min, pacing at CL 1000 ms). In 10 hearts, ECG and 8 epi- and endocardial monophasic action potentials were recorded. Action potential duration (APD) was measured at 90% repolarization and dispersion defined as APD max-min.

RESULTS

D-sotalol prolonged APD90 and increased dispersion of APD90 , simultaneously causing EADs and induction of TdP. The combination of d-sotalol and two concentrations of ranolazine did not increase dispersion of ventricular APD90 as compared to vehicle. Ranolazine at 5 μmol/L did not cause additional induction of EADs and/or TdP but also did not significantly suppress arrhythmogenic triggers. The higher concentration of ranolazine (10 μmol/L) in combination with d-sotalol caused further prolongation of APD90 , at the same time reduction in APD90 dispersion. In parallel, the incidence of EADs was reduced and an antitorsadogenic effect was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

In the healthy isolated rabbit heart (where late INa is not elevated), ranolazine does not cause proarrhythmia but exerts antiarrhythmic effects in a dose-dependent manner against d-sotalol/low K-induced TdP. This finding-despite additional APD prolongation-supports the safety of a combined use of both drugs and merits clinical investigation.

Electrophysiological profile of vernakalant in an experimental whole-heart model: the absence of proarrhythmia despite significant effect on myocardial repolarization

AIM

The most recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) update on atrial fibrillation has introduced vernakalant (VER) for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety profile of VER in a sensitive model of proarrhythmia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 36 Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts, VER (10, 30 µM, n = 12); ranolazine (RAN, 10, 30 µM, n = 12), or sotalol (SOT, 50; 100 µM, n = 12) were infused after obtaining baseline data. Monophasic action potentials and a 12-lead electrocardiogram showed a significant QT prolongation after application of VER as compared with baseline (10 µM: +25 ms, 30 µM: +50 ms, P < 0.05) accompanied by an increase of action potential duration (APD). The increase in APD90 was accompanied by a more marked increase in effective refractory period (ERP) leading to a significant increase in post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR, 10 µM: +30 ms, 30 µM: +36 ms, P < 0.05). Vernakalant did not affect the dispersion of repolarization. Lowered potassium concentration in bradycardic hearts did not provoke early afterdepolarizations (EADs) or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (pVT). Comparable results were obtained with RAN. Hundred micromolars of SOT led to an increase in QT interval (+49 ms) and APD90 combined with an increased ERP and PRR (+23 ms). In contrast to VER, 100 µM SOT led to a significant increase in dispersion of repolarization and to the occurrence of EAD in 10 of 12 and pVT in 8 of 12 hearts.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, application of VER and SOT led to a comparable prolongation of myocardial repolarization. Both drugs increased the PRR. However, VER neither affect the dispersion of repolarization nor induce EAD and therefore did not cause proarrhythmia.