Heart failure management with β-blockers: can we do better?

Heart failure (HF) is associated with disabling symptoms, poor quality of life, and a poor prognosis with substantial excess mortality in the years following diagnosis. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is a key feature of the pathophysiology of HF and is an important driver of the process of adverse remodelling of the left ventricular wall that contributes to cardiac failure. Drugs which suppress the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, including β-blockers, are foundation therapies for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and despite a lack of specific outcomes trials, are also widely used by cardiologist in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Today, expert opinion has moved away from recommending that treatment for HF should be guided solely by the LVEF and interventions should rather address signs and symptoms of HF (e.g. oedema and tachycardia), the severity of HF, and concomitant conditions. β-blockers improve HF symptoms and functional status in HF and these agents have demonstrated improved survival, as well as a reduced risk of other important clinical outcomes such as hospitalisation for heart failure, in randomised, placebo-controlled outcomes trials. In HFpEF, β-blockers are anti-ischemic and lower blood pressure and heart rate. Moreover, β-blockers also reduce mortality in the setting of HF occurring alongside common comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, CKD (of any severity), and COPD. Higher doses of β-blockers are associated with better clinical outcomes in populations with HF, so that ensuring adequate titration of therapy to their maximal (or maximally tolerated) doses is important for ensuring optimal outcomes for people with HF. In principle, a patient with HF could have combined treatment with a β-blocker, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor/neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a SGLT2 inhibitor, according to tolerability.

Sympathetic overactivity, hypertension and cardiovascular disease: state of the art

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the most prevalent cause of premature death worldwide. It had been suspected for decades that increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) might play a pathogenetic role in the development and progression of hypertension, heart failure (HF) and CVD. The use of microneurographic techniques to directly assess the SNS has allowed this field to advance considerably in recent years. We now have compelling evidence for a key role of sympathetic overactivity in the pathogenesis and progression of hypertension and associated hypertension-mediated organ damage (such as endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness and left ventricular hypertrophy), HF (with or without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction). Sympathetic overactivity also drives increased cardiovascular risk in the settings of obesity, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnoea, among other conditions. Thus, sympathetic overactivity is an important factor that drives patients through the CVD continuum, from the early appearance of cardiovascular risk factors, to impairments of the structure and function of components of the heart and arteries, to established CVD, and ultimately to a life-threatening cardiovascular event. A deeper understanding of the role of sympathetic overactivity in the pathogenesis of CVD and HF will support the optimization of therapeutic interventions for these conditions.

β-blockers are not all the same: pharmacologic similarities and differences, potential combinations and clinical implications

β-blockers are a heterogeneous class, with individual agents distinguished by selectivity for β1- vs. β2- and α-adrenoceptors, presence or absence of partial agonist activity at one of more β-receptor subtype, presence or absence of additional vasodilatory properties, and lipophilicity, which determines the ease of entry the drug into the central nervous system. Cardioselectivity (β1-adrenoceptor selectivity) helps to reduce the potential for adverse effects mediated by blockade of β2-adrenoceptors outside the myocardium, such as cold extremities, erectile dysfunction, or exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. According to recently updated guidelines from the European Society of Hypertension, β-blockers are included within the five major drug classes recommended as the basis of antihypertensive treatment strategies. Adding a β-blocker to another agent with a complementary mechanism may provide a rational antihypertensive combination that minimizes the adverse impact of induced sympathetic overactivity for optimal blood pressure-lowering efficacy and clinical outcomes benefit.

Treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the world. Risk factor modification, anticoagulation, rhythm control, and rate control are the four pillars of its management. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines on management of AF were updated recently.

Immediate Reaction to Propranolol: An Extremely Rare but Important Condition. A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Beta-blockers involve a group of drugs widely used nowadays. Propranolol was the first beta-blocker available in the market. It is the most prescribed first-generation betablocker and is commonly used. Beta-blocker allergy is extremely unusual. Only an isolated case of an urticaria reaction to propranolol has been published in 1975.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 44-year-old man. In 2016, he was treated with a daily dose of 5 mg of propranolol prescribed for a diagnosis of essential tremor. On the third day of medical treatment, he experienced an episode of generalized urticaria directly related to the administration of propranolol. He continued with his habitual treatment and he had no other urticaria episodes. A drug provocation test was carried out with gradually increasing doses of the culprit drug. Thirty minutes after a total cumulative dose of 5 mg, the patient had several hives on the chest, abdominal region and arms. Two weeks later, a new drug provocation test was performed to bisoprolol as an alternative beta-blocker, with good tolerance.

CONCLUSION

We describe a new case of urticaria secondary to propranolol, presenting as an immediate hypersensitivity reaction. Bisoprolol has been succesfully proved to be a safe option. Bisoprolol is a second-generation beta-blocker, it is available and commercialized worldwide, which makes it a good alternative.

Efficacy and Safety of Bisoprolol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of bisoprolol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Research Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements. The primary outcome measures analyzed included: Pulmonary function(FEV1, FEV1%, FVC), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), adverse events and inflammatory cytokines(IL-6, IL-8, CRP).

Results

Thirty-five studies were included with a total of 3269 study participants, including 1650 in the bisoprolol group and 1619 in the control group. The effect of bisoprolol on lung function in patients with COPD, FEV1, MD (0.46 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.65], P=0.000), FEV1%, MD (-0.64 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.86], P=0.000), FVC, MD (0.20 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.34], P=0.008), the results all showed a statistically significant result. The effect of bisoprolol on 6MWD in COPD patients, MD (1.37 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.66], P=0.000), which showed a statistically significant result. The occurrence of adverse events in COPD patients treated with bisoprolol, RR (0.83 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.26], P=0.382), resulted in no statistical significance. The effect of bisoprolol on inflammatory cytokines in COPD patients, IL-6, MD (-1.16 [95% CI, -1.67 to -0.65], P=0.000), IL-8, MD (-0.94 [95% CI, -1.32 to -0.56], P=0.000), CRP, MD (-1.74 [95% CI, -2.40 to -1.09], P=0.000), the results were statistically significant. We performed a subgroup analysis of each outcome indicator according to whether the patients had heart failure or not, and the results showed that the therapeutic effect of bisoprolol on COPD did not change with the presence or absence of heart failure.

Conclusion

Bisoprolol is safe and effective in the treatment of COPD, improving lung function and exercise performance in patients with COPD, and also reducing inflammatory markers in patients with COPD, and this effect is independent of the presence or absence of heart failure.

β1-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms: a possible genetic predictor of bisoprolol response in acute coronary syndrome

Aim

To investigate the association between beta1-adrenergic receptor (ADRB1) polymorphisms and response to bisoprolol treatment in beta-blocker naive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Patients & methods

Seventy-seven patients received bisoprolol for four weeks. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and during treatment. TaqMan allelic discrimination method was utilized for ADRB1 Ser49Gly and Arg389Gly genotyping.

Results

Arg389Arg carriers showed greater reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-8.5% ± 7.8% vs -0.76% ± 8.7%, p = 0.000218), and (-9.5% ± 9.7% vs -0.80% ± 11.5%, p = 0.000149), respectively, compared with Gly389 carriers. No statistical difference was found for study's outcomes based on codon 49.

Conclusion

Arg389Gly polymorphism is a promising bisoprolol response predictor in ACS patients.

Potential application of bisoprolol derivative compounds as antihypertensive drugs: synthesis and in silico study

Two bisoprolol derivatives, N-acetyl bisoprolol and N-formyl bisoprolol, belonging to the beta-blocker class of antihypertensive drugs, were synthesized using acetylation and formylation reactions. The yields of the reactions were determined to be 32.40% for N-acetyl bisoprolol and 20.20% for N-formyl bisoprolol. In silico methods such as molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation and SwissADME prediction were employed to evaluate the potential of these bisoprolol derivatives as antihypertensive drugs. These methods were used to assess the interaction between the bisoprolol derivatives and various receptors associated with hypertension, including human angiotensin I-converting enzyme (PDB ID: 1O8A), renin (PDB ID: 2V0Z), beta-1 adrenergic receptors (PDB ID: 4BVN, 7BVQ), voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1S (PDB ID: 6JP5) and mineralocorticoid receptor (PDB ID: 6L88). Our results demonstrated the highest binding energy when bisoprolol and its derivatives bound to 4BVN, with binding energy values of 6.74 kcal mol-1, 7.03 kcal mol-1 and 7.63 kcal mol-1 for bisoprolol, N-acetyl bisoprolol and N-formyl bisoprolol, respectively. The stability of these complexes was confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations, with a root-mean-square deviation value of approximately 2. Furthermore, the SwissADME results indicated that both derivatives exhibited similar properties to the reference drug bisoprolol.

Role of β-blockers in the cardiovascular disease continuum: a collaborative Delphi survey-based consensus from Asia-Pacific

OBJECTIVE

This Delphi method of consensus was designed to develop scientific statements for β-blockers in the continuum of cardiovascular diseases with a special focus on the role of bisoprolol.

METHODS

Eleven experienced cardiologists from across the Asia-Pacific countries participated in two rounds of the survey. In the first round, experts were asked to rate agreement/disagreement with 35 statements across seven domains regarding the use of β-blockers for treating hypertension, heart failure, coronary artery diseases, co-morbidities, as well as their safety profile, usage pattern, and pharmacokinetic variability. A consensus for a statement could be reached with >70% agreement.

RESULTS

Except for seven statements, all attained consensus in the first round. In the second round that was conducted virtually, the experts re-appraised their ratings for the seven statements along with a critical appraisal of two additional statements that were suggested by experts in the preceding round. At the end of the second round, the final version included 36 statements (34 original statements, two statements suggested by experts, and the omission of one statement that did not attain consensus). The final version of statements in the second round was disseminated among experts for their approval followed by manuscript development.

CONCLUSION

Attainment of consensus for almost all statements reconfirms the clinical benefits of β-blockers, particularly β1-selective blockers for the entire spectrum of cardiovascular diseases.

Comparison between the ECG Outcomes of Metoprolol and Bisoprolol

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are essential agents in the management of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac arrhythmias. However, there are diurnal variations in the cardioprotective effects of the subgroups as a result of their different pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic profiles.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare metoprolol and bisoprolol in terms of electrocardiogram (ECG) outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Prince Sultan Cardiac Center. The trial included 404 patients who met the inclusion criteria (204 in the metoprolol arm and 200 in the bisoprolol arm). Using case record forms that had already been created, information, such as patient demographics, medical histories, and treatment histories, was taken from their medical files. The most recent ECG records were also gathered. The ethical approval for this study was obtained from Qassim ethical committee (approval number: 45-44-902).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference found between the patients in both arms in terms of baseline characteristics, age, or sex.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we have compared the effects of metoprolol and bisoprolol beta blockers on ECG changes. The findings have indicated no difference between metoprolol and bisoprolol groups in terms of all ECG readings, particularly PR/ms, QTC-ms, and ventricular rate. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method for the quantitative analysis of nifedipine, bisoprolol, and captopril in human plasma: Application to pharmacokinetic studies

In this study, the development and validation of an accurate and highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method were performed for the estimation of nifedipine, bisoprolol and captopril in real human plasma. Liquid-liquid extraction using tert-butyl methyl ether was efficiently applied for extraction of the analytes from plasma samples. The chromatographic separation was carried out using an isocratic elution mode on the X-terra MS C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm, 3.5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of methanol-0.1% formic acid (95:5, v/v) for determination of nifedipine and bisoprolol and acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid (70:30, v/v) for determination of captopril with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Acceptable results regarding the different validation characteristics of the analytes were obtained in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration recommendations for bioanalytical methods. The developed approach was linear over concentration ranges of 0.5-130.0, 50.0-4,500.0 and 0.3-30.0 ng/ml for nifedipine, captopril and bisoprolol, respectively. The method revealed a sufficient lower limit of quantification in the range of 0.3-50.0 ng/ml, as well as high recovery percentages, indicating high bioanalytical applicability. The proposed method was efficiently applied to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of a fixed-dose combination of the analytes in healthy male volunteers.

A Sensitive Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric Method for Determination of Bisoprolol in Rat Serum after Pre-Column Derivatization

Two derivatization regents were reacted with bisoprolol (BIS), followed by liquid-chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis. 3-Bromomethyl-propyphenazone (BMP) and dansyl-chloride (Dns-Cl) were reacted via the secondary amino group using a catalyst to accelerate the reaction progress and completeness with minimal reaction byproducts. The sensitivity and the ionization efficiency of both BIS-methyl-propyphenazone (BIS-MP) and BIS-Dns via electrospray ionization were studied. The sensitivity of BIS-MP was superior to BIS-Dns. The derivatization procedure, extraction procedure, and LC-MS method were optimized and validated to achieve the monitoring of BIS in rat serum at a picogram scale. The calibration curve showed a regression coefficient value of 0.999 within a concentration spanning a range of 10-500 pg/mL. The detection limit and quantitation were 4 and 10 pg/mL, respectively. The intraday and inter-day precision values (% relative standard deviation) ranged from 0.53 to 6.91%, whereas the accuracy values (expressed as % error) ranged from -4.20 to -0.77%. The pharmacokinetic parameters were: 15,280 pg/mL for a maximum concentration of BIS (Cmax) at the maximum time (Tmax) of 1 h. BIS's elimination half-life (t1/2) was determined to be 3 h. The value of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0 - t) was 34,370 pg/mL h.

A Comparative Study to Investigate the Effects of Bisoprolol in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Hypertension When Switched from Tablets to Transdermal Patches

BACKGROUND

Oral beta-blockers are effective for heart failure and hypertension. Here, we conducted a prospective study to investigate the efficacy of the beta-blocker bisoprolol in patients switching from the oral tablet to the transdermal patch.

METHODS

We studied 50 outpatients receiving oral bisoprolol for chronic heart failure and hypertension. After patients switched treatments, we measured heart rate (HR) over 24 h by Holter echocardiography as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were (1) HR at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00, (2) the total number of premature atrial contractions (PACs) over 24 h and the incidence rate per time segment, and the total number of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) over 24 h and the incidence rate per time segment, (3) blood pressure, (4) atrial natriuretic peptide and B-type natriuretic peptide, and (5) echocardiography.

RESULTS

Minimum, maximum, mean, and total HR over 24 h was not significantly different between the two groups. Mean and maximum HR at 06:00, total PACs, total PVCs, and PVCs at 00:00 to 05:59 and 06:00 to 11:59 were significantly lower in the patch group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with oral bisoprolol, the bisoprolol transdermal patch lowers HR at 06:00 and inhibits the onset of PVCs during sleep and in the morning.

Outcome effects of enalapril with or without bisoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine the effects of enalapril combined with bisoprolol on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and their prognosis.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed data of 104 patients receiving AMI treatment in the First People's Hospital of Shanghai from May 2019 to October 2021, including 48 patients treated with enalapril alone (control group) and 56 patients treated with enalapril combined with bisoprolol (observation group). The efficacy, adverse reactions, cardiac function [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVED), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVES) and left ventricular mass (LVM)] of the two groups were measured and analyzed. The patients were followed up for one year to compare their prognosis.

RESULTS

The observation group showed a significantly higher total response rate than the control group (P < 0.05), but the incidence of adverse reactions was not different significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, LVES, LVED and LVEF increased significantly in both groups (P < 0.05), and the observation group showed significantly lower LVES and LVM levels and had a higher LVEF level than the control group (P < 0.05). The follow-up results revealed no significant difference in prognosis and survival between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Enalapril combined with bisoprolol is effective and safe in the treatment of AMI, because this regimen can effectively improve patients' cardiac function.

Preference and Adherence to a Fixed-Dose Combination of Bisoprolol-Aspirin and Blood Pressure Control: Results of an Open-Label, Multicentre Study

This study assessed blood pressure (BP) control and adherence in patients given a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of bisoprolol (BIS) + aspirin (ASA) compared to those given these two drugs as separate tablets. Patients with hypertension and/or coronary heart disease treated with two-pill BIS (5−10 mg) and ASA (75−100 mg) were switched to FDC BIS + ASA (either 5/75 mg or 10/75 mg) ≥4 weeks prior to study initiation. Adherence was estimated from pill counts and patients’ diaries (1−2 months and 3 months after inclusion) and using Morisky’s Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) at 3 months. BP control with the two treatments was compared. A total of 356 patients were enrolled (mean (SD) age: 64.3 ± 11.9 years, 56.5% male). Mean (SD) duration of prior treatment with two-pill BIS and ASA was 17.8 ± 26.6 months. FDC adherence was excellent or good (≥76%) in 98.3% and 98.0% of patients based on pill counts and patients’ diaries, respectively. Overall MMAS score was 3.1 ± 1.0. A significant decrease was observed in mean systolic BP, mean diastolic BP and heart rate over the 3-month period (all p < 0.001). FDC BIS + ASA was associated with excellent adherence and improved BP control. The majority (78.7%) of patients preferred the FDC.

Effect of Sequential Nephron Blockade versus Dual Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade Plus Bisoprolol in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension, a Randomized Controlled Trial (Resistant Hypertension on Treatment - ResHypOT)

Introduction

Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a leading public health concern.

Objectives

The primary aim was to compare sequential nephron blockade (SNB) versus dual renin-angiotensin system blockade (DRASB) plus bisoprolol in patients with resistant hypertension to observe reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) levels after 20 weeks of treatment.

Material and Methods

This trial was an open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, clinical study with optional drug up-titration. Participants were evaluated during five visits at 28-day intervals.

Results

The mean age was 55.5 years in the SNB and 58.4 years in the DRASB + bisoprolol group (p=NS). Significant office BP reductions were observed in both groups. SNB group, SBP decreased from 174.5±21.0 to 127.0±14.74 mmHg (p<0.0001), and DBP decreased from 105.3±15.5 to 78.11±9.28 mmHg (p<0.0001). DRASB group, SBP decreased from 178.4±21.08 to 134.4 ± 23.25 mmHg (p<0.0001) and DBP decreased from 102.7±11.07 to 77.33±13.75 mmHg (p<0.0001). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) showed also significant SBP and DBP reductions in both groups (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

In patients with RHTN adherent to treatment, SNB and DRASB plus bisoprolol showed excellent therapeutic efficacy, although SNB was associated with earlier SBP reduction.

Effect of bisoprolol on central aortic systolic pressure in Chinese hypertensive patients after the initial dose and long-term treatment

We conducted a prospective open-label cohort study with the aim of examining the effects of the highly β1-selective agent bisoprolol on central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) after the first dose and after 6 weeks' treatment and whether the CASP response could be predicted from the early response. Chinese patients with primary hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg) on no therapy or background amlodipine were treated with bisoprolol 2.5 mg daily for 6 weeks. Brachial systolic BP (Br-SBP), resting heart rate (HR) and CASP were determined at baseline, 24h after the first dose, and pre-dose after treatment for 6 weeks using the BPro® device. In 42 patients (age 54 ± 9 years) the mean reductions in CASP and Br-SBP after 6 weeks of treatment were not significantly different from each other at -14.5 ± 12.7 and -15.4 ± 12.9 mmHg (both p<0.01), respectively. Changes in CASP and Br-SBP were highly correlated after the first dose (r = 0.964, p<0.01) and after 6 weeks (r = 0.963, p<0.01) and the reductions in CASP after 6 weeks were also associated with the reduction in CASP after the first dose (r = 0.577, p<0.01). Bisoprolol was shown to effectively reduce CASP and this effect was directly proportional to the reduction in Br-SBP and of a similar magnitude. More favourable CASP responses to long term therapy may be predicted by greater reductions in CASP after the first dose.

Chromosomal Region 11p14.1 is Associated with Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bisoprolol

Purpose

Bisoprolol is a widely used beta-blocker in patients with cardiovascular diseases. As with other beta-blockers, there is variability in response to bisoprolol, but the underlying reasons for this have not been clearly elucidated. Our aim was to investigate genetic factors that affect bisoprolol pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), and potentially the clinical outcomes.

Patients and Methods

Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome were recruited prospectively on admission to hospital and followed up for up to 2 years. Patients from this cohort who were on treatment with bisoprolol, at any dose, had bisoprolol adherence data and a plasma sample, one month after discharge from index hospitalisation were included in the study. Individual bisoprolol clearance values were estimated using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Genome-wide association analysis after genotyping was undertaken using an Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome-8 v1.0 BeadChip array, while CYP2D6 copy number variations were determined by PCR techniques and phenotypes for CYP2D6 and CYP3A were inferred from the genotype. GWAS significant SNPs were analysed for heart rate response to bisoprolol in an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects.

Results

Six hundred twenty-two patients on bisoprolol underwent both PK and genome wide analysis. The mean (IQR) of the estimated clearance in this population was 13.6 (10.0-18.0) L/h. Bisoprolol clearance was associated with rs11029955 (p=7.17×10-9) mapped to the region of coiled-coil domain containing 34 region (CCDC34) on chromosome 11, and with rs116702638 (p=2.54×10-8). Each copy of the minor allele of rs11029955 was associated with 2.2 L/h increase in clearance. In an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects, rs11029955 was associated with 24-hour heart rate response to 4-week treatment with bisoprolol (p= 9.3×10-5), but not with rs116702638.

Conclusion

A novel locus on the chromosomal region 11p14.1 was associated with bisoprolol clearance in a real-world cohort of patients and was validated in independent cohort with a pharmacodynamic association.

Effectiveness of bisoprolol versus other β-blockers and other antihypertensive classes: a cohort study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

Aim: To compare blood pressure (BP) and safety outcomes in patients with hypertension initiating bisoprolol, versus other β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or diuretics. Materials & methods: New user cohort study. Patients initiating bisoprolol were matched with up to four patients, in each comparator cohort using propensity score. BP outcomes were compared using linear mixed models and safety outcomes using Cox proportional hazards. Results: Differences in average systolic and diastolic BP variation were ≤3 mmHg between bisoprolol versus the compared classes. No difference was observed in risk of diabetes, obesity or erectile dysfunction. An increased dyslipidemia risk was only observed versus diuretics (hazard ratio: 0.76; 98.75% CI: 0.58, 0.99). Conclusion: No differences in BP variation and safety outcomes.

Beta blockers for the treatment of arrhythmias: Bisoprolol - a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Beta blockers have long been successfully used for the treatment of both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. However, differences exist between their chemical structure, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties (absorption, bioavailability, metabolism, hydrophilic or lipophilic character, selective or non-selective nature, the presence or absence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity), which may confer different antiarrhythmic properties to different beta blockers. The aim of this study was to analyze the current existing evidence for bisoprolol for the treatment of both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using the keywords "bisoprolol" and "arrhythmias" or "atrial fibrillation" or "ventricular tachycardia" or "premature ventricular complexes" or "ventricular fibrillation", the Medline database was searched for articles in English or French until April 2020 assessing the role of bisoprolol in the treatment of arrhythmias. Data was then analyzed according to the type of arrhythmia treated and the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 325 studies were identified, of which 28 were considered relevant to the current topic. Among these studies, 19 assessed the role of bisoprolol for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias, 8 its role in treating ventricular arrhythmias and 1 its role in supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. The quality of evidence varied from low (7 studies) to high (5 studies).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence exists supporting the use of bisoprolol for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias, especially for rate control during atrial fibrillation. Evidence also exists for its efficacy in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, both in primary and in secondary prevention.

Effect of amlodipine versus bisoprolol in hypertensive patients on maintenance hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular hypertrophy and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) are surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the dialysis population. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a calcium channel blocker-based antihypertensive regimen compared to a beta-blocker-based antihypertensive regimen on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and ADMA levels in hypertensive patients on hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

This was a parallel-design, open-label, single-center randomized controlled trial on 46 hypertensive patients on maintenance HD, with no history of CVD. Patients were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine 10 mg/d (n = 23) or bisoprolol 10 mg/d (n = 23). Office-based blood pressure (BP) was targeted to ≤ 140/ 90 mm Hg. The outcome was the change in LVMI and ADMA from baseline to 6 months.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics did not vary between groups. After 6 months of treatment, amlodipine-based therapy induced a greater reduction in LVMI from baseline than bisoprolol-based treatment (35 ± 34.2 vs 9.8 ± 35.9 gm/m2; P = .017). A similar reduction in the mean BP occurred with treatment in both groups. ADMA concentration decreased significantly from baseline in the amlodipine group (0.75 ± 0.73 to 0.65 ± 0.67 nmol/mL; P = .001), but increased nonsignificantly in the bisoprolol group (0.64 ± 0.61 to 0.78 ± 0.64 nmol/mL; P = .052).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that compared to a bisoprolol-based regimen, an amlodipine-based antihypertensive regimen resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LVMI and ADMA levels from baseline in hypertensive patients on HD despite similar BP reduction in both groups. These findings support the re-evaluation of amlodipine as a potential first-line antihypertensive treatment in patients on HD without previous CVD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04085562, registered September 2019.

Influence of CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bisoprolol in Hypertensive Chinese Patients

Purpose: This study was performed to investigate the effects of common polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 on the plasma concentrations and antihypertensive effects of bisoprolol in hypertensive Chinese patients. Methods: One hundred patients with essential hypertension were treated with open-label bisoprolol 2.5 mg daily for 6 weeks. Clinic blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP (ABP) were measured after the placebo run-in and after 6 weeks treatment. Peak plasma concentrations of bisoprolol were measured at 3 h after the first dose and 3 h after the dose after 6 weeks treatment. Trough levels were measured before the dose after 6 weeks treatment. Bisoprolol plasma concentrations were measured with a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Six common polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and the CYP3A5 ^* 3 polymorphism were genotyped by TaqMan® assay. Results: After 6 weeks of treatment, clinic BP and heart rate were significantly reduced by 14.3 ± 10.9/8.4 ± 6.2 mmHg (P < 0.01) and 6.3 ± 7.6 BPM (P < 0.01), respectively. Similar reductions were seen in ABP values. Bisoprolol plasma concentration at 3 h after the first dose and 3 h post-dose after 6 weeks of treatment were significantly associated with baseline body weight (P < 0.001) but there was no significant effect of the CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms on these or the trough plasma concentrations. There was no significant association of the CYP2D6 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms or plasma bisoprolol concentrations with the clinic BP or ABP responses to bisoprolol. Conclusion: Bisoprolol 2.5 mg daily effectively reduced BP and HR. The common polymorphisms in CYP2D6 that were examined and the CYP3A5 ^* 3 polymorphism appear to have no benefit in predicting the hemodynamic response to bisoprolol in these patients.

The influence of edema on the bisoprolol blood concentration after bisoprolol dermal patch application: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Beta-blocking is important for critically ill patients. Although some patients are required to continue taking beta-blockers after they no longer need critical care, some of these patients have impaired swallowing abilities. Bisoprolol dermal patches have recently been introduced and appear to be a good alternative to oral bisoprolol tablets. However, it is still unclear whether the pharmacodynamics of such patches are affected by edema in patients who have experienced critical care. This study aimed to clarify the effects of systemic edema on beta-blocker absorption from dermal patches in critically ill patients.

METHOD

Patients who exhibited tachycardia and impaired swallowing function after critical care were included in this study. They were assigned to either the edema group (n = 6) or no edema group (n = 6) depending on the presence/absence of edema in the lower extremities. A bisoprolol dermal patch was pasted onto each subject, and the blood bisoprolol concentration was checked at 8 timepoints over the next 24 hours. The area under the serum concentration time curve, maximum concentration observed (Cmax), and time of maximum concentration observed were also examined.

RESULT

The mean blood bisoprolol concentrations of the 2 groups were not significantly different at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, or 24 hours after the patch application. The area under the serum concentration time curve and maximum concentration observed were not different between the groups. The mean heart rates of the 2 groups were not significantly different at 6, 12, or 24 hours after the patch application (Student t test, P = .0588, P = .1080, and P = .2322, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the blood concentration of bisoprolol and its heart rate-reducing effects after bisoprolol dermal patch application might not be affected by systemic edema in the lower extremities.

The Role of Lisinopril and Bisoprolol to Prevent Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients

Background:

Anthracyclines are a class of chemotherapeutic agents that are used to treat many different cancers, including breast cancer. Although anthracyclines remain an effective and commonly used therapy, their use is limited by cardiotoxicity. Heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction are the short and long-term complications of anthracyline exposure occurring in 5% to 23% of patients. Recent prospective studies have investigated the prophylactic role of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers as cardioprotective agents. This study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of lisinopril and bisoprolol could prevent anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity.

Methods:

In this randomized, controlled trial, 74 subjects with locally advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to a group receiving lisinopril and bisoprolol (n=37) or to a control group (n=37). Lisinopril and bisoprolol was started simultaneously 24 h before the first cycle of chemotherapy. The initial dose was 2.5 mg each, once daily, and was increased gradually under close supervision to 10 mg if SBP persistently remained >90 mmHg and HR >60 bpm. Echocardiographic studies were performed before and after the 6th cycle of neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (FAC). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline LVEF.

Results:

There was no difference in baseline LVEF between intervention and control group (65.77 ± 4.56 % v 65.64 ± 455 %, p = 0.92). There was also no difference in total anthracycline doses between 2 groups (579.48 ± 65.10 mg vs 557.50 ± 47.76 mg, p = 0.18). However, after 6 cycles of FAC, the rate of decline in LVEF was greater in control group (-5.52 ± 8,90 %) than in the intervention group (-0.27 ± 5.73 %) with p = 0.017. No severe adverse effects occurred in the intervention group related to the treatment with lisinopril and bisoprolol.

Conclusion:

Combined treatment with lisinopril and bisoprolol may prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The clinical relevance of this study should be confirmed in larger studies with longer follow up time.

β-Blockade for Patients with Hypertension, Ischemic Heart Disease or Heart Failure: Where are We Now?

β-blockers are a heterogeneous class of drugs, with varying selectivity/specificity for β₁ vs β₂ receptors, intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), and vasodilatory properties (through β₂ stimulation, α receptor blockade or nitric oxide release). These drugs are indicated for the management of arterial hypertension, heart failure or ischemic heart disease (IHD; eg angina pectoris or prior myocardial infarction). Most of the benefit of β-blockade in these conditions arises from blockade of the β₁ receptor, and, in practice, the addition of ISA appears to reduce the potential for improved clinical outcomes in people with heart failure or IHD. Aspects of the benefit/risk balance of β-blockers remain controversial, and recent meta-analyses have shed new light on this issue. We have reviewed the current place of cardioselective β-blockade in hypertension, IHD and heart failure, with special reference to the therapeutic profile of a highly selective β₁-adrenoceptor blocker, bisoprolol.

Comparison of Effect of Nebivolol and Bisoprolol on Sexual Function of Hypertensive Female Patients

Introduction

Male and female sexual dysfunction is frequently found in patients with hypertension. Many studies indicate that this is found more frequently in patients treated with beta-blockers rather than due to hypertension itself; however, almost all studies have been done on male population. This study aims to study the effect of two commonly used beta-blockers on sexual function of a hypertensive female patient.

Methods

This two-arm open-label randomized prospective study was conducted from April 1, 2019 to March 30, 2020 in a tertiary care hospital at Pakistan. One hundred and fifty participants randomized to group A were given nebivolol 5 mg once daily in addition to their current hypertensive treatment. Another 150 participants randomized to group B were given bisoprolol 5 mg once daily in addition to their hypertensive therapy. Sexual function was assessed on day 0 and day 90 using female sexual function index (FSFI).

Results

The mean sexual score in the nebivolol group significantly improved after day 90 in comparison to day 0 (24.16 ± 2.1 vs. 26.91 ± 2.6; p-value < 0.0001), while no difference in sexual score in bisoprolol group after day 90 was observed (24.14 ± 2.1 vs. 24.12 ± 2.0; p-value = 0.91).

Conclusion

In this study, nebivolol group was associated with a significant improvement in sexual function. This can be due to additional vasodilation properties and a low risk of sexual side effects associated with nebivolol.

Effects of trimetazidine in combination with bisoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To the best of our knowledge, there is no study that has conducted a review investigating the clinical efficacy and safety of bisoprolol combined with trimetazidine on chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therefore, in order to provide new evidence-based medical evidence for clinical treatment, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of bisoprolol combined with trimetazidine on CHF patients with COPD.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases including Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Wanfang Data, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library will be searched in April 2021 by 2 independent reviewers. For search on PubMed, the following search terms will be used: "trimetazidine, bisoprolol, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease." In order to achieve a consistency of extracted items, the data extractors will extract data from a sample of eligible studies. The outcomes include all-cause mortality and hospitalization for cardiac or/and respiratory causes; left ventricular structure and function; and functional scores. Review Manager software (v 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration) will be used for the meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers will assess the risk of bias of the included studies at study level. Any disagreements will be discussed and resolved in discussion with a third reviewer.

RESULTS

The results of our review will be reported strictly following the PRISMA criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The review will add to the existing literature by showing compelling evidence and improved guidance in clinic settings.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

10.17605/OSF.IO/ZWPRB.

β-blockers in hemodialysis: simple questions, complicated answers

In this issue of the Clinical Kidney Journal, Wu et al. present the results of a nationwide population-based study using Taiwanese administrative data to compare safety and efficacy outcomes with initiation of bisoprolol versus carvedilol among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for >90 days. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events over 2 years of follow-up. The study found that bisoprolol was associated with a lower risk for both major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared with carvedilol. While the bulk of the existing evidence favors a cardioprotective and survival benefit with β-blockers as a medication class among dialysis patients, there is wide heterogeneity among specific β-blockers in regard to pharmacologic properties and dialyzability. While acknowledging the constraints of observational data, these findings may serve to inform clinicians about the preferred β-blocker agent for dialysis patients to help mitigate cardiovascular risk and improve long-term survival for this high-risk population.

Use of paediatric xylometazoline nasal drop is not a child's play in hypertensive patients on bisoprolol: A case report

Xylometazoline, a sympathomimetic agent, is considered safe in hypertensive patients as a relief measure for nasal congestion with intranasal application. In the present case, a 58-year old male patient, having ischemic heart disease, controlled hypertension on telmisartan and bisoprolol, experienced hypertensive urgency in a span of two hours of intranasal administration of the paediatric formulation of xylometazoline. The interaction with bisoprolol should be kept in mind while using xylometazoline.

Comparative effectiveness of bisoprolol and carvedilol among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis

Background

Despite widespread use, there is no trial evidence to inform β-blocker's (BB) relative safety and efficacy among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We herein compare health outcomes associated with carvedilol or bisoprolol use, the most commonly prescribed BBs in these patients.

Methods

We created a cohort study of 9305 HD patients who initiated bisoprolol and 11 171 HD patients who initiated carvedilol treatment between 2004 and 2011. We compared the risk of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between carvedilol and bisoprolol users during a 2-year follow-up.

Results

Bisoprolol initiators were younger, had shorter dialysis vintage, were women, had common comorbidities of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and were receiving statins and antiplatelets, but they had less heart failure and digoxin prescriptions than carvedilol initiators. During our observations, 1555 deaths and 5167 MACEs were recorded. In the multivariable-adjusted Cox model, bisoprolol initiation was associated with a lower all-cause mortality {hazard ratio [HR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.73]} compared with carvedilol initiation. After accounting for the competing risk of death, bisoprolol use (versus carvedilol) was associated with a lower risk of MACEs [HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.91)] and attributed to a lower risk of heart failure [HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.91)] and ischemic stroke [HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.97)], but not to differences in the risk of acute myocardial infarction [HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93-1.15)]. Results were confirmed in propensity score matching analyses, stratified analyses and analyses that considered prescribed dosages or censored patients discontinuing or switching BBs.

Conclusions

Relative to carvedilol, bisoprolol initiation by HD patients was associated with a lower 2-year risk of death and MACEs, mainly attributed to lower heart failure and ischemic stroke risk.

Inadequate, inappropriate sinus-node tachycardia: an old cardiac arrhythmia in a new perspective (II.): Our experiences with the pharmacological treatment

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: Az inadekvát, aránytalan sinuscsomó-tachycardia a szív nomotop ingerképzési zavarával járó, nem ritka klinikai szindróma. A szívritmuszavar-entitást a nem paroxysmalis, magas nyugalmi sinusfrekvencia, a fizikai/pszichés stresszre adott aránytalan sinustachycardia, valamint főként palpitációs panaszok jellemzik. Célkitűzés: Az aránytalan sinuscsomó-tachycardiás betegeink gyógyszeres kezelésével szerzett tapasztalataink ismertetése. Módszerek: 2008 és 2018 között 104 beteget (92 nő, 12 férfi; átlagéletkor 31 ± 10 év) kezeltünk ezzel a szívritmuszavarral. A betegek kivizsgálásuk után 12 elvezetéses EKG-, terheléses EKG-, valamint 24 órás Holter-monitoros EKG-megfigyeléseken vettek részt a gyógyszeres kezelés előtt és után (bizoprolol: 2 × 5 mg/nap; ivabradin: 2 × 5 mg/nap). Az életminőség változását a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) tüneti skálája szerint állapítottuk meg. Eredmények: Mindkét gyógyszer jelentősen csökkentette a nyugalmi sinusfrekvenciát (kontroll: 102 ± 10/min; bizoprolol: 78 ± 6/min; ivabradin: 74 ± 8/min, mindkettő: p<0,0001). A gyógyszeres kezelés nélküli, 24 órás Holter-monitoros EKG-felvételek során mért szívfrekvenciák (minimum-maximum [átlag] sinusfrekvencia/min) a kontrollértékekről (58 ± 8-159 ± 14 [94 ± 6]/min) mindkét gyógyszerre egyaránt szignifikánsan csökkentek (bizoprolol: 53 ± 7-132 ± 13 [77 ± 9]/min [mindhárom: p<0,0001]; ivabradin 51 ± 6-134 ± 18 [77 ± 8]/min [mindhárom: p<0,0001]). A terheléses EKG-vizsgálatok előtt (kontroll: 99 ± 13/min; bizoprolol 81 ± 11/min [p<0,0001]; ivabradin: 84 ± 10/min [p<0,0001]) és a terhelés csúcspontján mért sinusfrekvenciák (kontroll: 164 ± 15/min; bizoprolol: 140 ± 16/min [p<0,0001]; ivabradin: 142 ± 14/min [p<0,0001]) is jelentősen mérséklődtek. Az azonos dózisban adott két gyógyszer szívfrekvencia-csökkentő hatásai között számottevő különbséget nem tapasztaltunk. Az életminőséget tükröző EHRA tüneti skálán (kontroll: 2,3 ± 0,7) mind a bizoprolol (1,4 ± 1,4; p<0,0001), mind az ivabradin (1,1 ± 0,2; p<0,0001) egyformán csökkentette a betegek tüneteit, panaszait. Számottevő cardiovascularis mellékhatás egyik betegcsoportban sem jelentkezett. Következtetések: Vizsgálati eredményeink alapján megállapítható, hogy az aránytalan sinuscsomó-tachycardiás betegek gyógyszeres kezelésére: (1) a kardiospecifikus adrenerg béta-blokkoló bizoprolol és az If-csatorna-gátló ivabradin egyaránt hatékonynak és biztonságosnak bizonyult; (2) az azonos adagban adott két gyógyszer hatékonysága között számottevő különbség nem volt; (3) a gyógyszeres kezelés nemcsak a sinusfrekvenciát csökkentette, hanem a betegek panaszait, tüneteit is mérsékelte. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(46): 1953-1958.

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

The inadequate, inappropriate sinus-node tachycardia is not a rare clinical syndrome, defined as a disturbance of the nomotopic impulse formation of the heart. This cardiac arrhythmic entity is characterized by a non-paroxismal, increased sinus rate at rest, and/or inadequate response to physical and/or emotional stress and palpitations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe our experiences with pharmacological therapy of patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia syndrome.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2018, 104 patients (92 women, 12 men, mean age: 31 ± 10 years) were treated with this cardiac arrhythmia entity. All patients underwent 12-lead ECG, 24-hour Holter-ECG monitoring and standard bicycle dynamic exercise tests before and after drug treatment (bisoprolol: 5 mg bid; ivabradine: 5 mg bid). Changes in the quality of life were estimated by using the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score.

RESULTS

Both drugs decreased significantly the resting heart rate (control: 102 ± 10/min; bisoprolol 78 ± 6/min (p<0.0001), ivabradine: 74 ± 8/min (p<0.0001). The results of the parameters of the 24-hour Holter ECG recordings (expressed as minimal-maximal [average] heart rate/min) with drug therapy showed a significant decrease from control values in all three parameters: control 58 ± 8-159 ± 14 (94 ± 6)/min; bisoprolol 53 ± 7-132 ±13 (77 ± 9)/min (all three: p<0.0001); ivabradine: 51 ± 6-134 ± 18 (77 ± 8)/min (all three: p<0.0001). The sinus rate reduced significantly both before the bicycle dynamic exercise tests (control: 99 ± 13/min; bisoprolol: 81 ± 11/min [p<0.0001]; ivabradine: 84 ± 10/min [p<0.0001]) and at the peaks of the exercise test (control: 164 ± 15/min; bisoprolol: 140 ± 16/min [p<0.0001]; ivabradine 142 ± 14/min [p<0.0001]). The heart rate reducing effects of the two drugs did not differ significantly. The EHRA quality of life score was equally improved by the two drugs (control: 2.3 ± 0.7; bisoprolol: 1.4 ± 1.4 [p<0.0001]; ivabradine: 1.1 ± 0.2 [p<0.0001]). No cardiovascular side effects were observed while taking bisoprolol or ivabradine.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our clinical results, it can be pointed out that in the drug therapy of patients with inappropriate sinus node tachycardia: (1) bisoprolol (5 mg bid) and ivabradine (5 mg bid) proved to be equally effective and safe; (2) the heart rate reducing effect of the two drugs - given in the same dosage - did not differ considerably; (3) the pharmacological therapy significantly decreased not only the sinus frequency, but also reduced the symptoms of the patients. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(46): 1953-1958.

The impact of regular bisoprolol on the response to salbutamol in asthma: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Non-selective beta-blockers impair the bronchodilator response to beta₂ -agonists. Cardio-selective beta₁ -blockers are less likely to cause this effect, yet they remain relatively contraindicated in asthma. We investigated whether the response to salbutamol is impaired during cardio-selective beta₁ -blocker treatment in people with asthma.

METHODS

A random-order, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority, crossover study was conducted comparing up to 5 mg bisoprolol daily for 2 weeks with matching placebo, with an open-label extension of up to 10 mg bisoprolol daily. After each treatment period, mannitol was inhaled to induce bronchoconstriction with a 15% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁ ). Immediately after mannitol challenge, salbutamol (100, 100 and 200 μg) was administered via spacer at 5-min intervals with repeated FEV₁ measures. The FEV₁ recovery with salbutamol was measured as an area under recovery curve (AUC). Based on earlier research, a clinically relevant non-inferiority limit of a 30% reduction in the AUC was set.

RESULTS

A total of 19 adults with mild asthma and positive inhaled mannitol challenge completed the study. Adjusting for the FEV₁ fall induced by mannitol and treatment sequence, the mean AUC response to salbutamol after bisoprolol was 5% lower than after placebo, with a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of 26% lower. Thirteen participants completed the open-label extension up to 10 mg bisoprolol daily with mean AUC 11% higher after bisoprolol with a 95% CI of 5% lower.

CONCLUSION

The bronchodilator response to rescue salbutamol after mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction is non-inferior during regular treatment with the cardio-selective beta₁ -blocker, bisoprolol, compared to placebo.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12618000306213 at https://www.anzctr.org.au.

Bisoprolol, a β1 antagonist, protects myocardial cells from ischemia-reperfusion injury via PI3K/AKT/GSK3β pathway

The aim of this work was to explore whether bisoprolol plays a protective role in cardiomyocytes against ischemia-reperfusion injury via PI3K/AKT/ GSK3β pathway. We pretreated male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats with bisoprolol by oral administration prior to 0.5 h ischemia/4 h reperfusion. Myocardial infarct size and serum levels of cTnI and CK-MB were measured. In vitro, H9c2 cells were treated with hypoxia and reoxygenation, followed by measurement of cell viability, apoptosis, ROS production, cytometry, activities of AKT, GSK3β, and p-38 in the presence and absence of GSK3β siRNA. We found that bisoprolol reduced infarct size from 44% in I/R group to 31% in treated group (P < 0.05). The levels of cTnI and CK-MB were decreased from 286 ± 7 pg/mL and 32.2 ± 2 ng/mL in I/R group to 196 ± 2 pg/mL and 19.6 ± 0.9 ng/mL in the treated group, respectively (P < 0.05). Bisoprolol also increased cell viability while decreased apoptosis and ROS production in the treatment of hypoxia/ reoxygenation. Furthermore, bisoprolol increased AKT and GSK3β phosphorylation, an effect that was immediately eliminated by LY294002. GSK3β-specific siRNA experiment further confirmed that bisoprolol protected the myocardium against hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced injury via suppressing GSK3β activity. In conclusion, bisoprolol protected myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury via the PI3K/AKT/ GSK3β pathway.

Resting heart rate control and prognosis in coronary artery disease patients with hypertension previously treated with bisoprolol: a sub-group analysis of the BISO-CAD study

BACKGROUND

Resting heart rate (RHR) is considered as a strong predictor of total mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure in hypertension patients. Bisoprolol fumarate, a second-generation beta-adrenoreceptor blockers (β-blocker) is commonly prescribed drug to manage hypertension. The present study was to retrospectively evaluate changes in the average RHR and its association with cardiovascular outcomes in bisoprolol-treated coronary artery disease (CAD) patients from the CAD treated with bisoprolol (BISO-CAD) study who had comorbid hypertension.

METHODS

We performed ad-hoc analysis for hypertension sub-group of the BISO-CAD study (n = 866), which was a phase IV, multination, multi-center, single-arm, observational study carried out from October 2011 to July 2015 across China, South Korea, and Vietnam. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with incidence of composite cardiac clinical outcome (CCCO), the results were presented as adjusted odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) and adjusted P value.

RESULTS

A total of 681 patients (mean age: 64.77 ± 10.33 years) with hypertension from BISO-CAD study were included in the analysis. Bisoprolol improved CCCOs in CAD patients with comorbid hypertension, with RHR <65 and <70 beats/min compared with RHR ≥65 and ≥75 beats/min, respectively, in the efficacy analysis (EA) set. In addition, it lowered RHR in both intent-to-treat (ITT) and EA groups after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment. Further, RHR 70 to 74 beats/min resulted in significantly higher risk of CCCOs EA set of patients (adjusted OR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.19-15.89; P = 0.03). Also, events of hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome were higher when RHR 69 to 74 beats/min compared to RHR <69 beats/min in ITT patients.

CONCLUSION

Bisoprolol can effectively reduce RHR in Asian CAD patients with comorbid hypertension and hence, improve CCCO without affecting their blood pressure.

Cold Flow Evaluation in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems by Measuring the Width of the Oozed Adhesive

The objective of this study was to develop a simpler and more practical quantitative evaluation method of cold flow (CF) in transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDSs). CF was forcibly induced by loading a weight on a punched-out sample (bisoprolol and tulobuterol tapes). When the extent of CF was analyzed using the area of oozed adhesive as following a previously reported method, the CF profiles were looked different between the samples 12 mm in diameter subjected to a 0.5-kg weight and samples 24 mm in diameter subjected to a 2.0-kg weight despite an equal load per unit area (4.42 g/mm²). The width of oozed adhesive around the original sample was suggested to be an index that properly describes the relationship between the load per unit area and the extent of CF. Further, it was clarified that the average CF width over the entire circumference of the sample was the same whether the samples were round or square as long as the sample area and load were the same. We also observed a linear relationship between the CF width and the aspect ratio of oval and rectangular samples. These results indicated that the CF properties of typical TDDS products lacking CF-proof processing at the edges could be determined by testing samples cut from the product rather than the whole TDDS patch. The proposed width measuring method was simple and useful for optimizing the composition of the adhesive and for testing the quality of the product.

Recent advances in understanding and managing resistant/refractory hypertension

The management of resistant hypertension presents several challenges in everyday clinical practice. During the past few years, several studies have been performed to identify efficient and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management of such patients. The Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2) trial demonstrated significant benefits with the use of spinorolactone as a fourth-line drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension over doxazosin and bisoprolol. In addition, recent data support that spironolactone may demonstrate superiority over central acting drugs in such patients, as well. Based on the European guidelines, spironolactone is recommended as the fourth-line drug option, followed by amiloride, other diuretics, doxazosin, bisoprolol or clonidine.  Among several device-based approaches, renal sympathetic denervation had fallen into hibernation after the disappointing results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN) 3 trial. However, the technique re-emerged at the epicenter of the clinical and research interest after the favorable results of three sham-controlled studies, which facilitated novel catheters and techniques to perform the denervation. Significant results of iliac anastomosis on blood pressure levels have also been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the technique-related adverse events resulted in withdrawal of this interventional approach. Last, the sympatholytic properties of the carotid baroreceptor activation therapy were associated with significant blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension, which need to be verified in larger controlled trials. Currently device-based approaches are recommended only in the setting of clinical trials until more safety and efficacy data become available.

Metoprolol and bisoprolol ameliorate hypertrophy of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes induced by high glucose via the PKC/NF-κB/c-fos signaling pathway

Hyperglycemia caused by diabetes mellitus could increase the risk of diabetic cardiomyopathy. However, to the best of our knowledge, the underlying mechanism of this process is still not fully explored. Thus, developing ways to prevent hyperglycemia can be beneficial for diabetic patients. The present study was designed to investigate the influence of metoprolol and bisoprolol on the cardiomyocytic hypertrophy of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Cardiomyocytes were cultured in two types of media: One with low glucose levels and one with high glucose levels. Cardiomyocytes cultured in high glucose were further treated with the following: A protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, an NF-κB inhibitor, metoprolol or bisoprolol. The pulsatile frequency, cellular diameter and surface area of cardiomyocytes were measured. Protein content and [³H]-leucine incorporation were determined, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), α-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC) and β-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC) mRNA levels were calculated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, while the expression and activation of PKC-α, PKC-β₂, NF-κB, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and c-fos were detected by western blotting. Metoprolol or bisoprolol were also used in combination with PKC inhibitor or NF-κB inhibitor to determine whether the hypertrophic response would be attenuated to a lower extent compared with metroprolol or bisoprolol alone. Cardiomyocytes cultured in high glucose presented increased pulsatile frequency, cellular diameter, surface area, and protein content and synthesis, higher expression of ANP and β-MHC, and lower α-MHC expression. High glucose levels also upregulated the expression and activation of PKC-α, PKC-β₂, NF-κB, TNF-α and c-fos. Metoprolol and bisoprolol partly reversed the above changes, while combined use of metoprolol or bisoprolol with PKC inhibitor or NF-κB inhibitor further ameliorated the hypertrophic response mentioned above to lower levels compared with using metroprolol or bisoprolol alone. In conclusion, metoprolol and bisoprolol could prevent hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes cultured in high glucose by the inhibition of the total and phospho-PKC-α, which could further influence the PKC-α/NF-κB/c-fos signaling pathway.

Comparison of Nebivolol and Bisoprolol for Cardiovascular Mortality in Hypertensive Patients

Introduction Beta-blockers again are now considered as first-line therapy for various cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we compare the cardiovascular event between two beta-blocker, i.e. Nebivolol and Bisoprolol. Materials and Methods It is a two-arm open-label randomized prospective study that was conducted from 1st Jan 2016 to 30th July 2019 in tertiary care hospital, Nawabshah. One thousand and fifty-six (n=1056) hypertensive patients were enrolled after informed consent, which were randomized into two equal groups. Patients were followed up for one year. Results Comparison between Nebivolol and Bisoprolol showed that all-cause mortality (9.8% vs 11.48%), cardiovascular mortality (5.4% vs 7.0%), all-cause hospitalization (14.4% vs 16.3%), and cardiovascular hospitalization (9.8% vs 12.09%) was numerically lower in nebivolol but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Further large scale multicentric trials with a longer follow up period are needed to compare various beta-blockers for cardiovascular event.

[Possibilities of cardioselective beta - blocker bisoprolol therapy in patients having coronary artery disease and bronchial asthma]

AIM

to compare the antianginal and pulse slowing effects, the impact on the ectopic myocardial activity as well as the safety of the treatment with beta - adrenoblocker bisoprolol, calcium antagonist verapamil and the combination of bisoprolol with amlodipine in patients with stable angina (SA) and bronchial asthma (BA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 90 patients with SA II-III functional class (FC) having concomitant persistent asthma of moderate severity, controlled, without exacerbation. The patients were divided into three groups with 30 individuals in each one depending on the main antianginal drug prescribed. Group 1 patients received a cardio - selective beta - adrenergic blocker bisoprolol (Concor) at the dose of 5 mg/day, patients of group 2 were treated by a calcium antagonist verapamil at the dose of 240 mg/day, patients of group 3 received combined therapy with bisoprolol at the dose of 5 mg/day and amlodipine at the dose of 5 mg/day given as a fixed combination (Concor AM 5/5). All the patients were investigated by the methods of daily ECG monitoring and respiratory function study (RFS) in addition to physical examination at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment, patients of group 1 and group 3 did not complain of angina attacks and did not use nitroglycerin unlike patients of group 2. The achieved heart rate (HR) in group 1 patients was 68.6±8.5 beats/min, in group 2 - 74.3±5.6 beats/min, in group 3 - 67.3±4.8 beats/min. A significant decrease in the number of supraventricular and ventricular extrasystoles occurred in patients of group 1 and group 3 only. Thus, the pulse slowing, antianginal, antiischemic and antiarrhythmic effect of the calcium antagonist verapamil, even at the dose of 240 mg/day, is not always sufficient for the patients with SA II-III FC and concomitant BA, unlike therapy with the inclusion of beta - blocker bisoprolol. During the study there was no registered deterioration in the indices of bronchial patency according to the RFS data in the patients of all three groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant asthma, all three types of pulse slowing therapy do not have any negative effects on bronchial patency. Therapy with the inclusion of beta - blockers (bisoprolol or its combination with amlodipine), in contrast to verapamil, reliably reduces heart rate and the number of supraventricular and ventricular extrasystoles in addition to a good antianginal effect.

S-amlodipine-bisoprolol combination therapy caused elevated transaminases and triglyceride levels in healthy Chinese subjects: a randomized controlled, open-label, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic interaction study

Introduction: S-amlodipine is main anti-hypertensive active enantiomer of amlodipine. Bisoprolol is a β-blocker particularly suitable for hypertensive patients with sinus tachycardia. We evaluated the pharmacokinetic interaction between S-amlodipine and bisoprolol in healthy Chinese subjects. Areas covered: Thirty-two subjects were randomly divided into two equal groups. Subjects in group A were administered S-amlodipine 5 mg for 10 days followed by S-amlodipine 5 mg plus bisoprolol 5 mg for 7 days. Subjects in group B were administered bisoprolol 5 mg for 7 days, followed by S-amlodipine 5 mg plus bisoprolol 5 mg for 10 days. Blood samples were collected for evaluation of pharmacokinetic interaction. Tolerability was evaluated by interview, vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, physical examination, and clinical laboratory tests. Expert opinion: The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) for amlodipine AUC_τ,ss and C_ss-max during the monotherapy and combination therapy periods were 1.0389 (0.9879, 1.0926) and 1.0213 (0.9556, 1.0915). For bisoprolol, it was 1.0193 (0.9834, 1.0566) and 0.9989 (0.9133, 1.0925). Most adverse events were mild-moderate. There was high incidence of elevated alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and triglyceride.This study found no pharmacokinetic interaction between S-amlodipine and bisoprolol. Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and triglycerides should be closely monitored.