Sympathetic overactivity, hypertension and cardiovascular disease: state of the art

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the most prevalent cause of premature death worldwide. It had been suspected for decades that increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) might play a pathogenetic role in the development and progression of hypertension, heart failure (HF) and CVD. The use of microneurographic techniques to directly assess the SNS has allowed this field to advance considerably in recent years. We now have compelling evidence for a key role of sympathetic overactivity in the pathogenesis and progression of hypertension and associated hypertension-mediated organ damage (such as endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness and left ventricular hypertrophy), HF (with or without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction). Sympathetic overactivity also drives increased cardiovascular risk in the settings of obesity, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnoea, among other conditions. Thus, sympathetic overactivity is an important factor that drives patients through the CVD continuum, from the early appearance of cardiovascular risk factors, to impairments of the structure and function of components of the heart and arteries, to established CVD, and ultimately to a life-threatening cardiovascular event. A deeper understanding of the role of sympathetic overactivity in the pathogenesis of CVD and HF will support the optimization of therapeutic interventions for these conditions.

β-blockers are not all the same: pharmacologic similarities and differences, potential combinations and clinical implications

β-blockers are a heterogeneous class, with individual agents distinguished by selectivity for β1- vs. β2- and α-adrenoceptors, presence or absence of partial agonist activity at one of more β-receptor subtype, presence or absence of additional vasodilatory properties, and lipophilicity, which determines the ease of entry the drug into the central nervous system. Cardioselectivity (β1-adrenoceptor selectivity) helps to reduce the potential for adverse effects mediated by blockade of β2-adrenoceptors outside the myocardium, such as cold extremities, erectile dysfunction, or exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. According to recently updated guidelines from the European Society of Hypertension, β-blockers are included within the five major drug classes recommended as the basis of antihypertensive treatment strategies. Adding a β-blocker to another agent with a complementary mechanism may provide a rational antihypertensive combination that minimizes the adverse impact of induced sympathetic overactivity for optimal blood pressure-lowering efficacy and clinical outcomes benefit.

Anaphylactic shock in a patient with severe aortic stenosis treated with adrenaline and landiolol for circulatory management: A case report

RATIONALE

We present the first case of a patient with severe aortic stenosis who developed anaphylactic shock and was successfully treated with adrenaline and landiolol, a highly selective β1-receptor blocker, to prevent disruption of the myocardial oxygen supply-demand balance caused by tachycardia.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 86-year-old woman was scheduled for simultaneous anterior-posterior fixation for a burst fracture of the 12th thoracic vertebra; 200 mg sugammadex, a neuromuscular blocking agent antagonist, was administered postoperatively, and she was extubated without complications. However, 6 min after extubation, her blood pressure decreased abruptly to 55/29 mm Hg, and her heart rate increased to 78 bpm. Then, we intervened with fluid loading, an increased dose of noradrenaline, and phenylephrine administration. However, her blood pressure did not increase.

DIAGNOSES

A general observation revealed urticaria on the lower leg; thus, we suspected anaphylactic shock due to sugammadex administration.

INTERVENTIONS

We carefully administered 2 doses of 0.05 mg adrenaline and simultaneously administered landiolol at 60 μg/kg/min to suppress adrenaline-induced tachycardia. Adrenaline administration resulted in a rapid increase in blood pressure to 103/66 mm Hg and a maximum heart rate of 100 bpm, suppressing excessive tachycardia.

OUTCOMES

The patient's general condition was stable after the intervention, and circulatory agonists could be discontinued the following day. She was discharged from the intensive care unit on the fourth postoperative day.

LESSONS

Landiolol may help control the heart rate of patients with aortic stenosis and anaphylactic shock. The combined use of landiolol and adrenaline may improve patient outcomes; however, their efficacy and risks must be evaluated by studying additional cases.

Ivabradine augments high-frequency dynamic gain of the heart rate response to low- and moderate-intensity vagal nerve stimulation under β-blockade

Our previous study indicated that intravenously administered ivabradine (IVA) augmented the dynamic heart rate (HR) response to moderate-intensity vagal nerve stimulation (VNS). Considering an accentuated antagonism, the results were somewhat paradoxical; i.e., the accentuated antagonism indicates that an activation of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels via the accumulation of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) augments the HR response to VNS, whereas the inhibition of HCN channels by IVA also augmented the HR response to VNS. To remove the possible influence from the accentuated antagonism, we examined the effects of IVA on the dynamic vagal control of HR under β-blockade. In anesthetized rats (n = 7), the right vagal nerve was stimulated for 10 min according to binary white noise signals between 0 and 10 Hz (V_0-10), between 0 and 20 Hz (V_0-20), and between 0 and 40 Hz (V_0-40). The transfer function from VNS to HR was estimated. Under β-blockade (propranolol, 2 mg/kg iv), IVA (2 mg/kg iv) did not augment the asymptotic low-frequency gain but increased the asymptotic high-frequency gain in V_0-10 (0.53 ± 0.10 vs. 1.74 ± 0.40 beats/min/Hz, P < 0.01) and V_0-20 (0.79 ± 0.14 vs. 2.06 ± 0.47 beats/min/Hz, P < 0.001). These changes, which were observed under a minimal influence from sympathetic background tone, may reflect an increased contribution of the acetylcholine-sensitive potassium channel (I_K,ACh) pathway after IVA, because the HR control via the I_K,ACh pathway is faster and acts in the frequency range higher than the cAMP-mediated pathway.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Since ivabradine (IVA) inhibits hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, interactions among the sympathetic effect, vagal effect, and IVA can occur in the control of heart rate (HR). To remove the sympathetic effect, we estimated the transfer function from vagal nerve stimulation to HR under β-blockade in anesthetized rats. IVA augmented the high-frequency dynamic gain during low- and moderate-intensity vagal nerve stimulation. Untethering the hyperpolarizing effect of acetylcholine-sensitive potassium channels after IVA may be a possible underlying mechanism.

Synergistic effects of low-intensity exercise conditioning and β-blockade on cardiovascular and autonomic adaptation in pre- and postmenopausal women with hypertension

The effects of a 12-week low-intensity exercise conditioning program (walking) on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), rate-pressure product (RPP), and cardiac autonomic function were measured in 40 sedentary women with hypertension. Women were assigned to either an exercise group (n = 20) or a control group (n = 20), matched for β-blockade treatment. They underwent testing at the beginning and at the end of the 12-week study period in three conditions: supine rest, standing, and low-intensity steady state exercise. The exercise group participated in a 12-week, low-intensity walking program, while the control group continued with usual sedentary activity. Compared with the control group, women in the exercise group showed reductions in systolic and diastolic BP and RPP (i.e., the estimated cardiac workload). β-Blockers increased baroreflex sensitivity and lowered BP and HR in all participants; however, those in the exercise group showed the effects of both treatments: a greater reduction in HR and RPP. The combination of exercise training and β-blockade produces cardiac and autonomic adaptations that are not observed with either treatment alone, suggesting that β-blockade enhances the conditioning effects of low-intensity exercise in women with hypertension.