1
|
Arevalo M, Sutton SK, Abdulla R, Christy SM, Meade CD, Roetzheim RG, Gwede CK. Longitudinal adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening among Black persons living in the United States enrolled in a community-based randomized trial. Cancer 2024; 130:1684-1692. [PMID: 38150285 PMCID: PMC11009071 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examined repeat colorectal cancer screening rates at 12 and 24 months as part of a randomized intervention trial among Black persons living in the United States and factors associated with screening adherence. METHODS Participants completed a survey assessing demographics and Preventive Health Model (PHM) factors (e.g., self efficacy, susceptibility) and received either a culturally targeted photonovella plus free fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits (intervention group) or a standard educational brochure plus free FIT kits (comparison group). FIT return was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months. Descriptive statistics summarized patterns of repeat screening. Logistic regression models assessed FIT uptake overtime, and demographic and PHM factors associated with screening adherence. RESULTS Participants (N = 330) were U.S.-born (93%), non-Hispanic (97%), and male (52%). Initial FIT uptake within 6 months of enrollment was 86.6%, and subsequently dropped to 54.5% at 12 months and 36.6% at 24 months. Higher FIT return rates were observed for the brochure group at 24 months (51.5% vs 33.3% photonovella, p = .023). Multiple patterns of FIT kit return were observed: 37% completed FIT at all three time points (full adherence), 22% completed two of three (partial adherence), 29% completed one of three (partial adherence), and 12% did not return any FIT kits (complete nonadherence). Predictors of full adherence were higher levels of education and self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Full adherence to repeat screening was suboptimal. Most participants had partial adherence (one or two of three) to annual FIT screening. Future studies should focus on strategies to support repeat FIT screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Arevalo
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Steven K. Sutton
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Rania Abdulla
- NTRO Non-Therapeutic Research Office, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Shannon M. Christy
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Richard G. Roetzheim
- Department of Family Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Clement K. Gwede
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gutstein L, Arevalo M, Reich RR, Fan W, Vadaparampil ST, Meade CD, Abdulla R, Lawrence E, Roetzheim RG, Lopez D, Collier A, Deak E, Ewing AP, Gwede CK, Christy SM. Factors associated with prior completion of colorectal cancer and hepatitis C virus screenings among community health center patients: a cross-sectional study to inform a multi-behavioral educational intervention. J Behav Med 2024; 47:295-307. [PMID: 38127175 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-023-00460-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) and liver cancer are two of the leading causes of cancer death in the United States and persistent disparities in CRC and liver cancer incidence and outcomes exist. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the main contributors to liver cancer. Effective screening for both CRC and HCV exist and are recommended for individuals based upon age, regardless of gender or sex assigned at birth. Recommendations for both screening behaviors have been recently updated. However, screening rates for both CRC and HCV are suboptimal. Targeting adoption of multiple screening behaviors has the potential to reduce cancer mortality and disparities. OBJECTIVE To examine psychosocial factors associated with completion of CRC and HCV screenings in order to inform a multi-behavioral educational intervention that pairs CRC and HCV screening information. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted with participants (N = 50) recruited at two community health centers in Florida (United States). Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests were used to examine associations between completion of both CRC and HCV screening, CRC and HCV knowledge, Preventive Health Model constructs (e.g., salience and coherence, response efficacy, social influence), and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS Most participants were White (84%), female (56%), insured (80%), and reported a household income of $25,000 or less (53%). 30% reported ever previously completing both CRC and HCV screenings. Prior completion of both screening behaviors was associated with higher educational attainment (p = .014), having health insurance (p = .022), being U.S.-born (p = .043), and higher salience and coherence scores for CRC (p = .040) and HCV (p = .004). CONCLUSIONS Findings demonstrate limited uptake of both CRC and HCV screenings among adults born between 1945 and 1965. Uptake was associated with multiple sociodemographic factors and health beliefs related to salience and coherence. Salience and coherence are modifiable factors associated with completion of both screening tests, suggesting the importance of incorporating these health beliefs in a multi-behavioral cancer education intervention. Additionally, health providers could simultaneously recommend and order CRC and HCV screening to improve uptake among this age cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lila Gutstein
- Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Mariana Arevalo
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Richard R Reich
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resources, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Wenyi Fan
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resources, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Cathy D Meade
- Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Rania Abdulla
- Non-Therapeutic Research Office, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Elizabeth Lawrence
- Turley Family Care Center, Baycare, 807 N. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL, 33755, USA
| | - Richard G Roetzheim
- Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Diana Lopez
- Suncoast Community Health Center, 313 S Lakewood Dr., Brandon, FL, 33511, USA
| | - Aaron Collier
- Formerly with Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Emalyn Deak
- Formerly with Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Aldenise P Ewing
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Ave., Building 293 Cunz Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Clement K Gwede
- Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mendez GG, Nocek JM, Brambilla DJ, Jacobs S, Cole O, Kanter J, Glassberg J, Saving KL, Melvin CL, Gibson RW, Treadwell M, Jackson GL, King AA, Gordeuk VR, Kroner B, Hsu LL. Social determinants of health and treatment center affiliation: analysis from the sickle cell disease implementation consortium registry. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:291. [PMID: 38448911 PMCID: PMC10916176 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10717-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) suffer early mortality and high morbidity. Many are not affiliated with SCD centers, defined as no ambulatory visit with a SCD specialist in 2 years. Negative social determinants of health (SDOH) can impair access to care. HYPOTHESIS Negative SDOH are more likely to be experienced by unaffiliated adults than adults who regularly receive expert SCD care. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of the SCD Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) Registry, a convenience sample at 8 academic SCD centers in 2017-2019. A Distressed Communities Index (DCI) score was assigned to each registry member's zip code. Insurance status and other barriers to care were self-reported. Most patients were enrolled in the clinic or hospital setting. RESULTS The SCDIC Registry enrolled 288 Unaffiliated and 2110 Affiliated SCD patients, ages 15-45y. The highest DCI quintile accounted for 39% of both Unaffiliated and Affiliated patients. Lack of health insurance was reported by 19% of Unaffiliated versus 7% of Affiliated patients. The most frequently selected barriers to care for both groups were "previous bad experience with the healthcare system" (40%) and "Worry about Cost" (17%). SCD co-morbidities had no straightforward trend of association with Unaffiliated status. The 8 sites' results varied. CONCLUSION The DCI economic measure of SDOH was not associated with Unaffiliated status of patients recruited in the health care delivery setting. SCDIC Registrants reside in more distressed communities than other Americans. Other SDOH themes of affordability and negative experiences might contribute to Unaffiliated status. Recruiting Unaffiliated SCD patients to care might benefit from systems adopting value-based patient-centered solutions.
Collapse
Grants
- 3U01HL134042-04S2 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- 5U01HL134042-S2 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- U24HL133948, U01HL133964, U01HL133990, U01HL133996, U01HL133994, U01HL133997, U01HL134004, U01HL134007, U01HL134042 NIH HHS
- NIH
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo G Mendez
- University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., MC 856 Pediatrics, 60612, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Judith M Nocek
- University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., MC 856 Pediatrics, 60612, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sara Jacobs
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA
| | | | - Julie Kanter
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | | | - Kay L Saving
- University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, USA
| | | | | | | | - George L Jackson
- Duke University, Durham, USA
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, USA
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | | | - Victor R Gordeuk
- University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., MC 856 Pediatrics, 60612, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Lewis L Hsu
- University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., MC 856 Pediatrics, 60612, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manne S, Heckman CJ, Frederick S, Schaefer AA, Studts CR, Khavjou O, Honeycutt A, Berger A, Liu H. A Digital Intervention to Improve Skin Self-Examination Among Survivors of Melanoma: Protocol for a Type-1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e52689. [PMID: 38345836 PMCID: PMC10897801 DOI: 10.2196/52689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although melanoma survival rates have improved in recent years, survivors remain at risk of recurrence, second primary cancers, and keratinocyte carcinomas. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends skin examinations by a physician every 3 to 12 months. Regular thorough skin self-examinations (SSEs) are recommended for survivors of melanoma to promote the detection of earlier-stage, thinner melanomas, which are associated with improved survival and lower treatment costs. Despite their importance, less than a quarter of survivors of melanoma engage in SSEs. OBJECTIVE Previously, our team developed and evaluated a web-based, fully automated intervention called mySmartSkin (MSS) that successfully improved SSE among survivors of melanoma. Enhancements were proposed to improve engagement with and outcomes of MSS. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and methodology for a type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial evaluating the enhanced MSS versus control and exploring implementation outcomes and contextual factors. METHODS This study will recruit from state cancer registries and social media 300 individuals diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma between 3 months and 5 years after surgery who are currently cancer free. Participants will be randomly assigned to either enhanced MSS or a noninteractive educational web page. Surveys will be collected from both arms at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months to assess measures of intervention engagement, barriers, self-efficacy, habit, and SSE. The primary outcome is thorough SSE. The secondary outcomes are the diagnosis of new or recurrent melanomas and sun protection practices. RESULTS Multilevel modeling will be used to examine whether there are significant differences in survivor outcomes between MSS and the noninteractive web page over time. Mixed methods will evaluate reach, adoption, implementation (including costs), and potential for maintenance of MSS, as well as contextual factors relevant to those outcomes and future scale-up. CONCLUSIONS This trial has the potential to improve outcomes in survivors of melanoma. If MSS is effective, the results could guide its implementation in oncology care and nonprofit organizations focused on skin cancers. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/52689.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Manne
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Sara Frederick
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Alexis A Schaefer
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Christina R Studts
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Olga Khavjou
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | | | - Adam Berger
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Hao Liu
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meade CD, Stanley NB, Arevalo M, Tyson DM, Chavarria EA, Aguado Loi CX, Rivera M, Gutierrez L, Abdulla R, Christy SM, Gwede CK. Transcreation matters: A learner centric participatory approach for adapting cancer prevention messages for Latinos. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 115:107888. [PMID: 37463555 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancing health equity requires innovative patient education approaches for adapting English-language evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to resonate with multicultural, multilingual audiences. OBJECTIVE Examine the benefit, functionality, and practical considerations of transcreation (translation + cultural adaptation) as a critical and salient learner-centric process for developing a Spanish-language intervention (photonovella + video): Un examen sencillo para un colon saludable (A simple test for a healthy colon). PATIENT/COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT We involved patients/community members in a participatory reflective process, from problem identification to intervention design, development, delivery, and impact measurement. METHODS A community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach involving formative research plus systematic iterative pretesting and learner verification checks augmented by a community advisory board guided the transcreation processes. RESULTS Data collected using a learner-centric approach effectively produced a new Spanish-language EBI and substantiated the value of co-learner/co-design methods. Learner-centric methods identified cultural nuances that were treated as knowledge and integrated into the intervention materials and study design. Pilot testing of the intervention among Latinos receiving care at community clinics demonstrated improved initial colorectal cancer screening uptake, awareness, and perceived susceptibility. DISCUSSION Inherent in the transcreation process was learner involvement that informed essential modification and adaptation of the materials. The transcreation methods led to the development of a culturally salient intervention that maintained theoretical integrity and message intent as well as behavioral activation. Findings have broad implications for the creation and transfer of EBIs to new audiences for greater adoption, engagement, and 'reach' of interventions. PRACTICAL VALUE Transcreation aligns with a growing paradigm shift in health communication science that brings to light the beneficial effect that construction and application of cultural knowledge has on patient education toward health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy D Meade
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
| | - Nathanael B Stanley
- Office of Community Outreach, Engagement & Equity. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mariana Arevalo
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA; Office of Community Outreach, Engagement & Equity. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Enmanuel A Chavarria
- Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Claudia X Aguado Loi
- Department of Health Science and Human Performance, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Rania Abdulla
- NTRO Non-Therapeutic Research Office, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Clement K Gwede
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hewitt RM, Ploszajski M, Purcell C, Pattinson R, Jones B, Wren GH, Hughes O, Ridd MJ, Thompson AR, Bundy C. A mixed methods systematic review of digital interventions to support the psychological health and well-being of people living with dermatological conditions. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1024879. [PMID: 36405626 PMCID: PMC9669071 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1024879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dermatological conditions can have a substantial impact on psychological as well as physical health yet dedicated face-to-face psychological support for patients is lacking. Thus, individuals may require additional support to self-manage dermatological conditions effectively. Digital technology can contribute to long-term condition management, but knowledge of the effectiveness of digital interventions addressing psychological (cognitive, emotional, and behavioural) aspects of dermatological conditions is limited. Objectives To identify, determine the effectiveness, and explore people’s views and experiences of digital interventions supporting the psychological health of people with dermatological conditions. Methods A mixed methods systematic review informed by JBI methodology. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Eight electronic databases were searched for papers written between January 2002 and October 2021. Data screening and extraction were conducted in Covidence. The methodological quality of studies were scrutinised against JBI critical appraisal tools. Intervention characteristics were captured using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist and guide. Data were synthesised using a convergent segregated approach. The results were reported in a narrative summary. Results Twenty-three papers were identified from 4,883 references, including 15 randomised controlled trials. Nineteen interventions were condition-specific, 13 were delivered online, 16 involved an educational component, and 7 endorsed established, evidence-based therapeutic approaches. Improvements in knowledge, mood, quality of life, the therapeutic relationship, and reduced disease severity in the short to medium term, were reported, although there was substantial heterogeneity within the literature. Thirteen studies captured feedback from users, who considered various digital interventions as convenient and helpful for improving knowledge, emotion regulation, and personal control, but technical and individual barriers to use were reported. Use of established qualitative methodologies was limited and, in some cases, poorly reported. Conclusion Some web-based digital psychological interventions seem to be acceptable to people living with mainly psoriasis and eczema. Whilst some digital interventions benefitted cognitive and emotional factors, heterogeneity and inconsistencies in the literature meant definitive statements about their effectiveness could not be drawn. Interdisciplinary and patient-centred approaches to research are needed to develop and test quality digital interventions supporting the psychological health of adults living with common and rare dermatological conditions. Systematic review registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=285435], identifier [CRD42021285435].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael M. Hewitt
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care–A JBI Centre of Excellence, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Rachael M. Hewitt,
| | | | - Catherine Purcell
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael Pattinson
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Bethan Jones
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Georgina H. Wren
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Hughes
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J. Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew R. Thompson
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- South Wales Clinical Psychology Training Programme, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board – School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Bundy
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Elston Lafata J, Shires DA, Shin Y, Flocke S, Resnicow K, Johnson M, Nixon E, Sun X, Hawley S. Opportunities and Challenges When Using the Electronic Health Record for Practice-Integrated Patient-Facing Interventions: The e-Assist Colon Health Randomized Trial. Med Decis Making 2022; 42:985-998. [PMID: 35762832 PMCID: PMC9583291 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221104094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Even after a physician recommendation, many people remain unscreened for
colorectal cancer (CRC). The proliferation of electronic health records
(EHRs) and tethered online portals may afford new opportunities to embed
patient-facing interventions within clinic workflows and engage patients
following a physician recommendation for care. We evaluated the
effectiveness of a patient-facing intervention designed to complement
physician office-based recommendations for CRC screening. Design Using a 2-arm pragmatic, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the
intervention’s effect on CRC screening use as documented in the EHR (primary
outcome) and the extent to which the intervention reached the target
population. Trial participants were insured, aged 50 to 75 y, with a
physician recommendation for CRC screening. Typical EHR functionalities,
including patient registries, health maintenance flags, best practice
alerts, and secure messaging, were used to support research-related
activities and deliver the intervention to enrolled patients. Results A total of 1,825 adults consented to trial participation, of whom 78%
completed a baseline survey and were exposed to the intervention. Most trial
participants (>80%) indicated an intent to be screened on the baseline
survey, and 65% were screened at follow-up, with no significant differences
by study arm. One-third of eligible patients were sent a secure message.
Among those, more than three-quarters accessed study material. Conclusions By leveraging common EHR functionalities, we integrated a patient-facing
intervention within clinic workflows. Despite practice integration, the
intervention did not improve screening use, likely in part due to
portal-based interventions not reaching those for whom the intervention may
be most effective. Implications Embedding patient-facing interventions within the EHR enabled practice
integration but may minimize program effectiveness by missing important
segments of the patient population. Highlights
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Elston Lafata
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Health Policy and Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Deirdre A Shires
- School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Yongyun Shin
- School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Susan Flocke
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Kenneth Resnicow
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Morgan Johnson
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ellen Nixon
- Center for Health Policy and Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Xinxin Sun
- School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sarah Hawley
- School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sunburns and Sun Protection Behaviors among Male Hispanic Outdoor Day Laborers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19052524. [PMID: 35270218 PMCID: PMC8909209 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Individuals who work outside are at increased risk for skin cancer due to excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Little is known about UV exposures and sun safety practices of outdoor day laborers, who are disproportionately Hispanic. This study identified the correlates of sunburn and sun protection behaviors in a sample of male, Hispanic day laborers (n = 175). More than half of the participants (54.9%) experienced one or more sunburns when working during the past summer, and 62.9% reported having one or more symptoms of heat illness. The frequency of engaging in sun protection behaviors was suboptimal, including sunglasses use (M = 2.68, SD = 1.71), staying in the shade (M = 2.30, SD = 0.94), wearing sunscreen (M = 2.10, SD = 1.39), and wearing a wide-brimmed hat (M = 1.75, SD = 1.32), based on a 5-point scale (1 = never; 5 = always). Lower education level, higher levels of skin sensitivity to the sun, any symptom of heat illness, fewer barriers to wearing a wide-brimmed hat, and not wearing a wide-brimmed hat were associated with a greater number of sunburns. Factors associated with each sun protection behavior varied. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Manne S, Heckman CJ, Kashy D, Ritterband L, Thorndike F, Lozada C, Coups EJ. Moderators of the Effects of mySmartSkin, a Web-Based Intervention to Promote Skin Self-examination and Sun Protection Among Individuals Diagnosed With Melanoma. Ann Behav Med 2022; 56:804-815. [PMID: 35028656 PMCID: PMC9345181 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying the characteristics of persons who benefit more from behavioral interventions can help health care providers decide which individuals should be offered particular interventions because this is the subgroup of persons who are more likely to derive greater benefit from the intervention and refine the underlying constructs of the model guiding the intervention. PURPOSE This study evaluated possible demographic, medical, knowledge and attitudinal, and psychosocial variables that may moderate the impact of an online intervention, called mySmartSkin (MSS), on engagement in skin self-examination (SSE) and sun protection behaviors among melanoma survivors. METHODS Participants completed a baseline survey and were then randomized to the MSS condition or usual care. Follow-up surveys were completed by participants at 8-, 24-, and 48-week postrandomization. RESULTS A greater impact of MSS on SSE was illustrated among participants with more phenotypic skin cancer risk factors and participants reporting lower baseline self-efficacy in conducting SSE. A more favorable response of MSS on sun protection behaviors was shown when initial knowledge about abnormal lesions and sun protection barriers were high. Greater use of MSS and more favorable evaluations of it were also associated with higher intervention response. CONCLUSIONS Future studies seeking to improve SSE and sun protection among melanoma survivors might benefit from focusing on survivors who report more skin cancer risk factors, lower self-efficacy in conducting SSE, less knowledge about what abnormal skin lesions look like, more perceived barriers to sun protection behaviors, and less worry about recurrence and cancer-related distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Department of Medicine, Behavioral Sciences, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Deborah Kashy
- Michigan State University, Department of Psychology, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Lee Ritterband
- School of Medicine, Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Carolina Lozada
- Department of Medicine, Behavioral Sciences, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gillespie C, Wiener RS, Clark JA. Patient Experience of Managing Adherence to Repeat Lung Cancer Screening. J Patient Exp 2022; 9:23743735221126146. [PMID: 36187210 PMCID: PMC9515519 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221126146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer screening (LCS) is a process involving multiple low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans over multiple years. While adherence to recommended follow-up is critical in reducing lung cancer mortality, little is known about factors influencing adherence following the initial LDCT scan. The purpose of this study was to examine patients’ and providers’ depictions of continued screening and their understandings of patients’ decisions to return for follow-up. Qualitative methodology involves interviews with patients about their understanding of the screening process and perceptions of lung cancer risk, including motivations to adhere to follow-up screening and surveillance. Analysis of interview transcripts followed the general procedures of grounded theory methodology. Patient adherence to LCS was influenced by their understanding of the process of screening, and their expectations for the next steps. Perceptions of lung cancer risk and associated motivation were not static and changed throughout the screening process. Recognizing that patients’ motivations may be dynamic over the course of screening and surveillance will assist providers in helping patients make decisions regarding continued engagement with LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Gillespie
- Center for HealthCare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA
| | - Renda Soylemez Wiener
- Center for HealthCare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA
- The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jack A Clark
- Dept. of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wainwright JV, Mehta SJ, Clifton A, Bocage C, Ogden SN, Cohen S, Rendle KA. Persistent Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Amid Centralized Outreach: A Mixed Methods Study. Am J Health Promot 2021; 36:697-705. [PMID: 34970929 PMCID: PMC9109679 DOI: 10.1177/08901171211064492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand patient experiences and persistent barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening amid centralized outreach at urban family medicine practices. APPROACH Following a pragmatic trial assessing mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach, we invited a subset of participants to complete a semi-structured qualitative interview and structured questionnaire. SETTING Single urban academic healthcare system. PARTICIPANTS Sixty patients who were eligible and overdue for CRC screening at the time of trial enrollment. METHOD Using Andersen's Behavioral Model, we developed an interview guide to systematically assess factors shaping screening decisions and FIT uptake. Close-ended responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS Most participants (82%) self-reported that they had ever completed any modality of CRC screening, and nearly half (43%) completed the mailed FIT during the trial. Most patients (60%) preferred FIT to colonoscopy due to its private, convenient, and non-invasive nature; however, persistent barriers related to screening beliefs including fear of test results and cancer treatment still prevented some patients from completing any form of CRC screening. CONCLUSIONS Mailed FIT can overcome many structural barriers to CRC screening, yet clear communication and follow-up amid centralized outreach are essential. For some patients, tailored outreach or navigation to address screening-related fears or other screening beliefs may be needed to ensure timely completion of CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn V Wainwright
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shivan J Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alicia Clifton
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Claire Bocage
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shannon N Ogden
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, 27118Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Cohen
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katharine A Rendle
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, 14640University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Manne SL, Marchetti MA, Kashy DA, Heckman CJ, Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Viola A, Lozada C, Coups EJ. mySmartCheck, a Digital Intervention to Promote Skin Self-examination Among Individuals Diagnosed With or at Risk for Melanoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Behav Med 2021; 56:791-803. [PMID: 34637495 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regular skin self-examination (SSE) reduces melanoma mortality but is not often conducted. PURPOSE To promote SSE performance in individuals at increased risk for melanoma. METHODS One hundred sixteen individuals at heightened risk for development of melanoma (i.e., personal/family history of melanoma, high-risk mole phenotype) who did not conduct a thorough SSE during in the prior 3 months were randomly assigned to receive either an automated internet-based intervention (mySmartCheck) or usual care (UC). One hundred sixteen participants completed surveys before random assignment and 99 completed the follow-up survey 13-weeks afterward. The primary outcome was participant self-reported examination (SSE) of all 15 parts of the body in the last 3 months. Secondary outcomes were SSE of any part of the body in the last 3 months and number of body parts examined during the last SSE. RESULTS More mySmartCheck participants examined all 15 body parts (32.6% vs. 7.1%, p = .001). More individuals in mySmartCheck reported conducting SSE on any body part than those in UC (81.4% vs. 62.5%, p = .04). Effect sizes were large (d = 1.19 all 15 body parts) to moderate (d = 0.55 for any body part). mySmartCheck participants examined more body areas than UC participants (12.7 vs. 10.3, p = 0.003) during the last SSE. Participants in mySmartCheck reported higher levels of knowledge of suspicious lesions, SSE benefits, SSE self-efficacy, and planning for SSE, and lower SSE barriers, than those assigned to UC. CONCLUSIONS mySmartCheck had a significant positive impact on SSE performance and behaviors. Additional research with a larger sample size, a longer follow-up, and more varied clinical settings is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov registration # NCT03725449 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03725449).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon L Manne
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Michael A Marchetti
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah A Kashy
- Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Lee M Ritterband
- Center for Behavioral Health & Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Adrienne Viola
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Carolina Lozada
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Manne SL, Heckman CJ, Kashy DA, Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Lozada C, Coups EJ. Randomized controlled trial of the mySmartSkin web-based intervention to promote skin self-examination and sun protection among individuals diagnosed with melanoma. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:1461-1472. [PMID: 33904921 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Adherence to regular, thorough skin self-examination (SSE) and consistent sun protection behaviors among melanoma survivors is relatively low. This study reports on the impact of an online intervention, called mySmartSkin (MSS), on engagement in SSE and sun protection behaviors among melanoma survivors, as well as the mediators of the intervention effects. The intervention was compared with usual care (UC), and primary outcomes were assessed at 24 and 48 weeks. Short-term outcomes were also evaluated at 8 weeks postbaseline. Results demonstrate a significant effect on SSE and sun protection. At all three follow-up assessments, the proportion of participants reporting conducting a thorough SSE in the time since the previous assessment was significantly greater in MSS than in UC. In addition, both multivariate and univariate analyses indicated that engagement in sun protection behaviors was significantly higher in MSS than UC at 24 weeks, but the effect on sun protection at 48 weeks was significant only in multivariate analyses. Beneficial effects of MSS were significantly mediated by knowledge about melanoma and characteristics of suspicious lesions, as well as self-efficacy. Participant engagement in MSS was satisfactory, with approximately two-thirds of participants completing at least two of the three core components. Content was rated as highly trusted, easy to understand, easy to navigate, and helpful. In conclusion, MSS illustrated significant and durable effects on SSE and mixed results on sun protection. Future studies should consider ways to further enhance treatment effects and engagement in MSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon L Manne
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Deborah A Kashy
- Michigan State University, Department of Psychology, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Lee M Ritterband
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Center for Behavioral Health & Technology, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Frances P Thorndike
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, Pear Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carolina Lozada
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heckman CJ, Manne SL, Kashy DA, Bhurosy T, Ritterband L, Coups EJ. Correlates of sun protection behaviors among melanoma survivors. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:882. [PMID: 33962615 PMCID: PMC8105954 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10951-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study objective was to assess potential correlates of sun protection behaviors among melanoma survivors. METHODS Participants were 441 melanoma survivors recruited from three health centers and a state cancer registry in the United States. Sun protection behaviors (sunscreen, shade, protective shirts, and hats) were assessed through an online survey, as were potential correlates (demographic, melanoma risk, knowledge and beliefs, psychological and social influence factors). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Correlates of sun protection behaviors included education, skin cancer risk factors, melanoma knowledge and beliefs, melanoma worry and distress, physician recommendation for sun protection, injunctive norms, and pro-protection beliefs (e.g., perceived barriers, self-efficacy). CONCLUSIONS Future efforts to improve sun safety among melanoma survivors may benefit from targeting individuals with lower education levels, and addressing sun protection social influence, barriers, and self-efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn J Heckman
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| | - Sharon L Manne
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | | | - Trishnee Bhurosy
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | | | - Elliot J Coups
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Niu Z, Tortolero-Luna G, Lozada C, Heckman CJ, Coups EJ. Correlates of Sun Protection Behaviors Among Adults in Puerto Rico. Int J Behav Med 2021; 29:36-45. [PMID: 33928477 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-021-09991-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of skin cancer has been increasing in Puerto Rico in recent years. Sun protection behaviors are suboptimal among Puerto Ricans. However, there are limited data regarding major factors associated with Puerto Rican adults' sun protection behaviors. To examine factors associated with Puerto Rican adults' sun protection behaviors, a survey study was conducted in Puerto Rico. METHOD A population-based sample of 667 Puerto Rican adults completed a telephone survey in 2016. Survey items addressed potential correlates of sun protection behaviors. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses examining correlates of the sun protection behaviors index were conducted. RESULTS Higher levels of sun protection behaviors were found among English language acculturated compared to Spanish language acculturated individuals (p < .05) and among individuals with private versus no health insurance (p < .05). Higher levels of sun protection behaviors were found among individuals with greater skin cancer knowledge (p < .001), fewer sun protection barriers (p < .01), and greater sun protection self-efficacy (p < .001). CONCLUSION By identifying correlates of Puerto Rican adults' sun protection behaviors, this timely study provides insight on factors to target in future skin cancer interventions in this understudied population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaomeng Niu
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| | - Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Centre, San Juan, PR, USA
| | - Carolina Lozada
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Niu Z, Wang T, Hu P, Mei J, Tang Z. Chinese Public's Engagement in Preventive and Intervening Health Behaviors During the Early Breakout of COVID-19: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19995. [PMID: 32716897 PMCID: PMC7474413 DOI: 10.2196/19995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since January 2020, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) swept over China and then the world, causing a global public health crisis. People's adoption of preventive and intervening behaviors is critical in curbing the spread of the virus. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate Chinese people's adoption of health behaviors in responding to COVID-19 and to identify key determinants for their engagement. METHODS An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed in early February 2020 among Mainland Chinese (18 years or older) to examine their engagement in preventive behaviors (eg, frequent handwashing, wearing masks, staying at home) and intervening behaviors (eg, advising family to wash hands frequently), and to explore potential determinants for their adoption of these health behaviors. RESULTS Out of 2949 participants, 55.3% (n=1629) reported frequent engagement in preventive health behaviors, and over 84% (n=2493) performed at least one intervening health behavior. Greater engagement in preventive behaviors was found among participants who received higher education, were married, reported fewer barriers and greater benefits of engagement, reported greater self-efficacy and emotional support, had greater patient-centered communication before, had a greater media literacy level, and had greater new media and traditional media use for COVID-19 news. Greater engagement in intervening behaviors was observed among participants who were married, had lower income, reported greater benefits of health behaviors, had greater patient-centered communication before, had a lower media literacy level, and had a greater new media and traditional media use for COVID-19 news. CONCLUSIONS Participants' engagement in coronavirus-related preventive and intervening behaviors was overall high, and the associations varied across demographic and psychosocial variables. Hence, customized health interventions that address the determinants for health behaviors are needed to improve people's adherence to coronavirus-related behavior guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaomeng Niu
- Rutgers Cancer Insititute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | | | | | | | - Zhihan Tang
- Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Weinstein L, LaNoue M, Hurley K, Payton C, Sifri R, Myers R. Feasibility Pilot Outcomes of a Mammography Decision Support and Navigation Intervention for Women With Serious Mental Illness Living in Supportive Housing Settings. J Prim Care Community Health 2020; 10:2150132719867587. [PMID: 31416398 PMCID: PMC6698985 DOI: 10.1177/2150132719867587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: People with serious mental illness (SMI) experience
significant disparities in morbidity and mortality from preventable and
treatable medical conditions. Women with SMI have low mammography screening
rates. SMI, poverty, and poor access to care can have a significant effect on a
woman’s opportunity to learn about and discuss breast cancer screening with
health care providers. This study examines the feasibility pilot outcomes of
mammography decision support and patient navigation intervention (DSNI) for
women with SMI living in supportive housing settings. The primary research
question was: Does the DSNI increase knowledge, promote favorable attitudes, and
decrease decisional conflict relating to screening mammography?
Methods: We developed the intervention with the community using
participatory methods. Women (n = 21) with SMI who had not undergone screening
mammography in the past year participated in an educational module and decision
counseling session and received patient navigation over a 6-month period. We
conducted surveys and interviews at baseline and follow-ups to assess
mammography decisional conflict. Results: Among study participants,
67% received a mammogram. The mammogram DSNI was feasible and acceptable to
women with SMI living in supportive housing settings. From baseline to 1-month
follow-up, decisional conflict decreased significantly (P =
.01). The patient navigation process resulted in 270 attempted contacts
(M = 12.86, SD = 10.61) by study staff (phone calls and
emails with patient and/or case manager) and 165 navigation conversations
(M = 7.86, SD = 4.84). A barrier to navigation was phone
communication, with in-person navigation being more successful. Participants
reported they found the intervention helpful and made suggestions for further
improvement. Conclusions: The process and outcomes evaluation
support the feasibility and acceptability of the mammography DSNI. This project
provides initial evidence that an intervention developed with participatory
methods can improve cancer screening outcomes in supportive housing programs for
people with SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Randa Sifri
- 2 Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ronald Myers
- 1 Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Manne SL, Heckman CJ, Kashy D, Lozada C, Gallo J, Ritterband L, Coups EJ. Prevalence and correlates of skin self-examination practices among cutaneous malignant melanoma survivors. Prev Med Rep 2020; 19:101110. [PMID: 32461880 PMCID: PMC7240727 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma patients are at elevated risk for recurrence of the primary cancer as well as second primary melanomas. Regular skin self-examination (SSE) is recommended as part of follow-up surveillance. In this study, we examined SSE performance and comprehensiveness as well as knowledge and attitudinal correlates of SSE performance and comprehensiveness. Four hundred forty-one melanoma survivors completed measures of SSE performance as well as knowledge and attitudes about SSE and melanoma. Approximately two-thirds of the sample reported having conducted an SSE in the past two months; the average number of body parts examined was 10.64 (out of 15 maximum). Only 7.5% of the sample checked all 15 body parts. Greater worry about recurrence, fewer barriers to SSE, more planning for when to conduct SSE, and more confidence in the ability to conduct SSE and recognize a suspicious growth were associated with both SSE performance and greater SSE comprehensiveness. Physician influence was positively associated with SSE performance. Survivor education efforts may benefit from reminding survivors to check hard-to-see and sensitive areas, develop a plan for how to ask for assistance in conducting exams, as well as use mirrors to see hard-to-reach areas. Addressing perceived SSE barriers, fostering SSE planning, and improving SSE self-efficacy may be important foci for intervention efforts to enhance SSE performance and comprehensiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Joseph Gallo
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Coups EJ, Manne SL, Ohman Strickland P, Hilgart M, Goydos JS, Heckman CJ, Chamorro P, Rao BK, Davis M, Smith FO, Thorndike FP, Ritterband LM. Randomized controlled trial of the mySmartSkin web-based intervention to promote skin self-examination and sun protection behaviors among individuals diagnosed with melanoma: study design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 83:117-127. [PMID: 31255801 PMCID: PMC6690854 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
>1.2 million people in the United States have a personal history of melanoma skin cancer and are at increased risk for disease recurrence and second primary melanomas. Many of these individuals do not follow recommendations to conduct regular, thorough skin self-examinations that facilitate early disease detection and do not sufficiently engage in sun protection behaviors. In this project, we are conducting a randomized controlled trial of an innovative, tailored, theory-driven Internet intervention-called mySmartSkin-to promote these behaviors among melanoma patients. This paper outlines the study design and characteristics of the study sample. A total of 441 patients were recruited (40.9% response rate) and randomized to the mySmartSkin or a Usual Care condition. Participants complete surveys at baseline and 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks later. The primary aim of the project is to examine the impact of mySmartSkin versus Usual Care on skin self-examination and sun protection behaviors. The secondary aim focuses on identifying mediators of the intervention's effects. In an exploratory aim, we will examine potential moderators of the impact of the intervention. At baseline, the recruited participants had a mean age of 61 years, 49% were female, 7.5% met criteria for having conducted a recent, thorough skin self-examination, and the mean score on the index of sun protection behaviors was 3.3 (on a scale from 1 to 5). The results of the project will determine whether the mySmartSkin intervention is efficacious in promoting skin self-examination and sun protection behaviors among individuals diagnosed with melanoma. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT03028948.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot J Coups
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Health Behavior, Systems & Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States.
| | - Sharon L Manne
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Health Behavior, Systems & Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
| | - Pamela Ohman Strickland
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Michelle Hilgart
- Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | | | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States; Department of Health Behavior, Systems & Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
| | - Paola Chamorro
- Department of Dermatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Babar K Rao
- Department of Dermatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Moira Davis
- Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, United States
| | - Franz O Smith
- Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, United States
| | | | - Lee M Ritterband
- Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Associations between linguistic acculturation and skin cancer knowledge and beliefs among U.S. Hispanic adults. Prev Med Rep 2019; 15:100943. [PMID: 31338284 PMCID: PMC6627961 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of melanoma among U.S. Hispanics is rising and Hispanics have poorer melanoma survival compared to non-Hispanic whites. Acculturation has been linked with skin cancer-related behaviors among Hispanic individuals, such that Hispanic individuals who are more acculturated to U.S. norms and attitudes have been found to use sunscreen more frequently, to seek shade and use sun protective clothing less often, to sunbathe and indoor tan more frequently, and to have more sunburns than less acculturated individuals. However, little is known about factors that may account for the effect of acculturation on such behaviors and outcomes. The goal of this study was to examine the association between linguistic acculturation and skin cancer-related knowledge and beliefs among Hispanic adults. 788 Hispanic adults completed an online survey measuring linguistic acculturation, sun protection knowledge, perceived skin cancer risk, perceived severity, perceived worry, skin color preference, perceived suntan benefits, photo-aging concerns, sun protection norms, tanning norms and skin cancer fatalism. Compared with Spanish-acculturated Hispanics, English-acculturated Hispanics had greater knowledge, lower levels of perceived risk of skin cancer, lower perceived severity of skin cancer, less worry about skin cancer, greater perceived suntan benefits, and lower photo-aging concerns. This study highlights the importance of considering an individual's level of acculturation when designing skin cancer prevention interventions. Additional research is warranted to develop and test culturally relevant, tailored interventions to reduce the risks of skin cancer among U.S. Hispanics.
Collapse
|
21
|
Christy SM, Sutton SK, Gwede CK, Chavarria EA, Davis SN, Abdulla R, Schultz I, Roetzheim R, Shibata D, Meade CD. Examining the Durability of Colorectal Cancer Screening Awareness and Health Beliefs Among Medically Underserved Patients: Baseline to 12 months Post-Intervention. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2019; 34:297-303. [PMID: 29177920 PMCID: PMC6873805 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1301-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The current study examines changes in awareness and health beliefs from baseline to 12 months post-intervention following receipt of one of two colorectal cancer (CRC) educational interventions that aimed to promote CRC screening among a racially and ethnically diverse and medically underserved population. Participants (N = 270) were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to increase CRC screening and completed both baseline and 12-month follow-up assessments. Participants were aged 50-75, at average CRC risk, not up-to-date with CRC screening guidelines, and receiving care at one of three community-based clinics. Participants were randomized to receive either a targeted, low-literacy intervention informed by the Preventive Health Model [PHM] (photonovella and DVD plus fecal immunochemical test [FIT]) or a non-targeted intervention (standard educational brochure plus FIT). Changes in CRC awareness and health beliefs from baseline to 12 months were examined both within and between intervention groups using Student's t tests. Participants in both intervention conditions demonstrated an increase in CRC awareness, PHM social influence, and trust in the healthcare system (all p's < .0001), with no significant between-group differences. Among those receiving the targeted intervention, there also was an increase in PHM salience (p < .05). Among individuals receiving the non-targeted intervention, there was an increase in PHM response efficacy (p < .01) and PHM self-efficacy (p < .0001). Both CRC screening interventions promoted positive changes in awareness and several health beliefs from baseline to 12 months, suggesting important benefits of CRC education. Regardless of whether education was targeted or non-targeted, providing CRC screening education successfully promoted durable changes in awareness and health beliefs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M Christy
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven K Sutton
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Clement K Gwede
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Enmanuel A Chavarria
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Brownsville, TX, USA
| | - Stacy N Davis
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Health Education and Behavioral Science, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Rania Abdulla
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Ida Schultz
- Premier Community HealthCare Group, Inc., Dade City, FL, USA
| | - Richard Roetzheim
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David Shibata
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Cathy D Meade
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MFC-EDU, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Recruitment Techniques and Strategies in a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Study of Men and Women of African Ancestry. Nurs Res 2019; 67:212-221. [PMID: 29698327 DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruiting ethnically diverse Black participants to an innovative, community-based research study to reduce colorectal cancer screening disparities requires multipronged recruitment techniques. OBJECTIVES This article describes active, passive, and snowball recruitment techniques, and challenges and lessons learned in recruiting a diverse sample of Black participants. METHODS For each of the three recruitment techniques, data were collected on strategies, enrollment efficiency (participants enrolled/participants evaluated), and reasons for ineligibility. RESULTS Five hundred sixty individuals were evaluated, and 330 individuals were enrolled. Active recruitment yielded the highest number of enrolled participants, followed by passive and snowball. Snowball recruitment was the most efficient technique, with enrollment efficiency of 72.4%, followed by passive (58.1%) and active (55.7%) techniques. There were significant differences in gender, education, country of origin, health insurance, and having a regular physician by recruitment technique (p < .05). DISCUSSION Multipronged recruitment techniques should be employed to increase reach, diversity, and study participation rates among Blacks. Although each recruitment technique had a variable enrollment efficiency, the use of multipronged recruitment techniques can lead to successful enrollment of diverse Blacks into cancer prevention and control interventions.
Collapse
|
23
|
Lafata JE, Shin Y, Flocke SA, Hawley ST, Jones RM, Resnicow K, Schreiber M, Shires DA, Tu SP. Randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of offering postvisit decision support and assistance in obtaining physician-recommended colorectal cancer screening: the e-assist: Colon Health study-a protocol study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e023986. [PMID: 30617102 PMCID: PMC6326296 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION How to provide practice-integrated decision support to patients remains a challenge. We are testing the effectiveness of a practice-integrated programme targeting patients with a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In partnership with healthcare teams, we developed 'e-assist: Colon Health', a patient-targeted, postvisit CRC screening decision support programme. The programme is housed within an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded patient portal. It leverages a physician screening recommendation as the cue to action and uses the portal to enrol and intervene with patients. Programme content complements patient-physician discussions by encouraging screening, addressing common questions and assisting with barrier removal. For evaluation, we are using a randomised trial in which patients are randomised to receive e-assist: Colon Health or one of two controls (usual care plus or usual care). Trial participants are average-risk, aged 50-75 years, due for CRC screening and received a physician order for stool testing or colonoscopy. Effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing screening use, as documented in the EHR, between trial enrollees in the e-assist: Colon Health and usual care plus (CRC screening information receipt) groups. Secondary outcomes include patient-perceived benefits of, barriers to and support for CRC screening and patient-reported CRC screening intent. The usual care group will be used to estimate screening use without intervention and programme impact at the population level. Differences in outcomes by study arm will be estimated with hierarchical logit models where patients are nested within physicians. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION All trial aspects have been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the health system in which the trial is being conducted. We will disseminate findings in diverse scientific venues and will target clinical and quality improvement audiences via other venues. The intervention could serve as a model for filling the gap between physician recommendations and patient action. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02798224; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Elston Lafata
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Yongyun Shin
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Susan A Flocke
- Center for Community Health Integration, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Department of Medicine, Center for Health Communications Research, Michigan and Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Resa M Jones
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ken Resnicow
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Deirdre A Shires
- School of Social Work, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Shin-Ping Tu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rockliffe L, Chorley AJ, Marlow LAV, Forster AS. It's hard to reach the "hard-to-reach": the challenges of recruiting people who do not access preventative healthcare services into interview studies. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2018; 13:1479582. [PMID: 29912650 PMCID: PMC6127841 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1479582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In this article, we discuss the challenges faced in recruiting "hard-to-reach" groups for interview studies, specifically those who do not access preventative healthcare services. We do this by reflecting on the varying success of different recruitment methods we have used in two recent studies; one investigating ethnic disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination uptake and another exploring difference in cervical screening non-participation. Engaging new community groups to help with recruitment proved particularly difficult, as did recruiting online. Our most successful recruitment methods included recruiting through community groups with whom we had previously established relationships, recruiting through schools and re-contacting participants who previously completed a related survey. We conclude that successful recruitment is dependent on study awareness and engagement. We urge others to be transparent in reporting recruitment methods in order to benefit the qualitative research community and suggest that details are published as supplementary material alongside qualitative articles in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Rockliffe
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Amanda J. Chorley
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| | | | - Alice S. Forster
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Coups EJ, Manne SL, Pagoto SL, Criswell KR, Goydos JS. Facebook Intervention for Young-Onset Melanoma Patients and Their Family Members: Pilot and Feasibility Study. JMIR DERMATOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.2196/derma.9734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
26
|
Sun Safe Partners: A pilot and feasibility trial of a couple-focused intervention to improve sun protection practices. Prev Med Rep 2018; 12:220-226. [PMID: 30370209 PMCID: PMC6202659 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This single arm pilot intervention study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary impact of a Sun Safe Partners, which is a couple-focused intervention targeting improved sun protection behavior. Data were collected from New Jersey between August 2015 and March 2016. Participants were 61 couples reporting low levels of sun protection recruited from an online panel. After providing online consent, couples received mailed pamphlets and participated in a call where they discussed current levels of sun protection, made an Action Plan to improve sun protection, and discussed ways of assisting one another in improving sun protection. A call summary was mailed afterwards. Feasibility was assessed by study enrollment, call participation, follow-up survey completion, and intervention evaluation. Participants completed a baseline survey, and a one month and six month post-intervention survey assessing sun protection as well as individual and relationship-centered sun protection attitudes and practices. Results indicated that acceptance into the trial was 22.1%. Call participation was high (84%) and the intervention was well-evaluated. Among the 51 couples who completed the call and a follow-up, the intervention improved sun protection behaviors. Sun protection benefits, photo-aging risk, and relationship-centered attitudes and practices increased. A couple-focused intervention shows promise for improving sun protection. Future studies using a randomized clinical trial as well as strategies to improve study participation are recommended. Couples reported increases in their support for one another's sun protection. Couples understood how sun protection benefits their partners and the relationship. Couple-focused interventions can promote better sun protection behavior.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cukor D, Pencille M, Ver Halen N, Primus N, Gordon-Peters V, Fraser M, Salifu M. An RCT comparing remotely delivered adherence promotion for sleep apnea assessment against an information control in a black community sample. Sleep Health 2018; 4:369-376. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
28
|
Understanding Cancer Worry Among Patients in a Community Clinic-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Study. Nurs Res 2018; 67:275-285. [PMID: 29870517 DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) screening disparities, it is important to understand correlates of different types of cancer worry among ethnically diverse individuals. OBJECTIVES The current study examined the prevalence of three types of cancer worry (i.e., general cancer worry, CRC-specific worry, and worry about CRC test results) as well as sociodemographic and health-related predictors for each type of cancer worry. METHODS Participants were aged 50-75, at average CRC risk, nonadherent to CRC screening guidelines, and enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to increase CRC screening. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire assessing sociodemographics, health beliefs, healthcare experiences, and three cancer worry measures. Associations between study variables were examined with separate univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS Responses from a total of 416 participants were used. Of these, 47% reported experiencing moderate-to-high levels of general cancer worry. Predictors of general cancer worry were salience and coherence (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.0, 1.3]), perceived susceptibility (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI [1.1, 1.3), and social influence (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.0, 0.1]). Fewer (23%) reported moderate-to-high levels of CRC-specific worry or CRC test worry (35%). Predictors of CRC worry were perceived susceptibility (aOR = 1.4, 95% CI [1.3, 1.6]) and social influence (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI [1.0, 1.2]); predictors of CRC test result worry were perceived susceptibility (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI [1.1, 1.3) and marital status (aOR = 2.0, 95% CI [1.1, 3.7] for married/partnered vs. single and aOR = 2.3, 95% CI [1.3, 4.1] for divorced/widowed vs. single). DISCUSSION Perceived susceptibility consistently predicted the three types of cancer worry, whereas other predictors varied between cancer worry types and in magnitude of association. The three types of cancer worry were generally predicted by health beliefs, suggesting potential malleability. Future research should include multiple measures of cancer worry and clear definitions of how cancer worry is measured.
Collapse
|
29
|
Crawford J, Beaton D, Ahmad F, Bierman AS. Cross-cultural survey development: The Colon Cancer Screening Behaviors Survey for South Asian populations. BMC Res Notes 2017; 10:770. [PMID: 29282127 PMCID: PMC5745603 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-3098-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work was to develop a survey that considered cultural relevance and diversity of South Asian populations, with the aim of describing or predicting factors that influence colorectal cancer screening intention and adherence. The scientifically rigorous approach for survey development informed the final phase of an exploratory mixed method study. This initial survey was later cross-culturally translated and adapted into the Urdu language, and thereafter, items were cognitively tested for conceptual relevance among South Asian immigrants. RESULTS The initial development of the Colon Cancer Screening Behaviours Survey for South Asian populations was completed using a number of steps. Development involved: the identification of key concepts and conceptual model; literature search for candidate measures and critical appraisal; and, expert consultation to select relevant measures. Five published surveys included measures that covered concepts relevant to South Asians and colorectal cancer screening behaviours. However, measures from these surveys missed content that emerged through parallel field work with South Asians, and additions were required along with item modifications. In the final stage, cross-cultural translation and adaptation into Urdu, and cognitive testing were completed. Future research will require an examination of proposed relationships, and psychometric testing of measures in the survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Crawford
- Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1 Canada
| | - Dorcas Beaton
- Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada
- Measurement Stream, Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Farah Ahmad
- School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Arlene S. Bierman
- Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement (CEPI), Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Washington DC, USA
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Crawford J, Ahmad F, Bierman AS, Beaton D. Cognitive testing of the Colon Cancer Screening Behaviours Survey with South Asian immigrants in Canada. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2017. [PMCID: PMC6091743 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-017-0007-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusions Electronic supplementary material
Collapse
|
31
|
Christy SM, Gwede CK, Sutton SK, Chavarria E, Davis SN, Abdulla R, Ravindra C, Schultz I, Roetzheim R, Meade CD. Health Literacy among Medically Underserved: The Role of Demographic Factors, Social Influence, and Religious Beliefs. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 22:923-931. [PMID: 29125435 PMCID: PMC6278594 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1377322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The current study examined the sociodemographic and psychosocial variables that predicted being at risk for low health literacy among a population of racially and ethnically diverse patients accessing primary care services at community-based clinics. Participants (N = 416) were aged 50-75 years, currently not up-to-date with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, at average CRC risk, and enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed at promoting CRC screening. Participants completed a baseline interview that assessed health literacy as measured by Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Revised, sociodemographic factors, and psychosocial variables (e.g., health beliefs) prior to randomization and receipt of an intervention. Thirty-six percent of the participants were found to be at risk for low health literacy. Sociodemographic and psychosocial variables were assessed as predictors of being at risk for low health literacy using logistic regression. In the final model, predictors were male gender, being from a racial/ethnic minority group, being unable to work, having higher social influence scores, and having higher religious belief scores. These findings suggest several patient characteristics that may be associated with low health literacy, and highlight the importance of supporting all patients through simplified and clear communications and information to improve understanding of CRC screening information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M. Christy
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Clement K. Gwede
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Steven K. Sutton
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Enmanuel Chavarria
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Brownsville, Texas, USA
| | - Stacy N. Davis
- Health Education and Behavioral Science, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Rania Abdulla
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Chitra Ravindra
- Florida Department of Health Pinellas County, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA
| | - Ida Schultz
- Premier Community HealthCare Group, Inc., Dade City, Florida, USA
| | - Richard Roetzheim
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Division of Population Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Green BB, BlueSpruce J, Tuzzio L, Vernon SW, Aubree Shay L, Catz SL. Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:531. [PMID: 28558663 PMCID: PMC5450259 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4458-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is particularly important for fecal testing. Some U.S. studies report that only 25% of individuals repeat fecal testing annually. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify barriers and facilitators reported by patients with suboptimal screening adherence to refine interventions for starting ongoing adherence to CRC screening. We also explored whether participants, particularly never screeners, would be willing to do a CRC screening blood test. Methods Forty-one patients who previously enrolled in the Systems of Support to Increase CRC Screening (SOS) trial were interviewed 4–5 years later. Participants were purposively selected to include men and women with diverse race/ethnicities who had either been inconsistent screeners or had never screened during the first three years of SOS despite receiving at least two rounds of mailed fecal tests. Two interviewers conducted 30-min telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. An iterative thematic analysis approach was used. Results Themes related to screening barriers were more pervasive among never screeners including: (1) Avoidance (inattention, procrastination) (2) Concerns about handling stool; (3) Health concerns; (4) Fear of a cancer diagnosis or positive test results. Themes related to screening facilitators were more often mentioned by participants who screened at least once including: (1) Use of a simpler 1-sample fecal test; (2) Convenience of mailings and doing the test at home; (3) Salience of prevention, especially as one got older; and (4) Influence of recommendations from providers, family and friends. Participants had diverse preferences for the number (3 on average) and types (phone, mail, text) of screening reminders. Some participants did not prefer e-mail links to the patient shared electronic health record because of difficulties remembering their password. It was acceptable for a nurse or medical assistant not from their clinic to call them as long as that person was knowledgeable about their records and could communicate with their physician. Participants, especially never screeners, were generally very enthusiastic about the potential option of a CRC screening blood test. Conclusion Future CRC screening programs should be designed to minimize these barriers and maximize facilitators to improve long-term screening adherence. Trial registration Primary Funding Agency: The National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01CA121125). Registered at clinicaltrials.govNCT00697047.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Metropolitan Park East, 1730 Minor Avenue Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
| | - June BlueSpruce
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Metropolitan Park East, 1730 Minor Avenue Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Leah Tuzzio
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Metropolitan Park East, 1730 Minor Avenue Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Sally W Vernon
- University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, 1200 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - L Aubree Shay
- University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, 1200 Pressler Street, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sheryl L Catz
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Metropolitan Park East, 1730 Minor Avenue Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.,Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hamilton JG, Genoff MC, Salerno M, Amoroso K, Boyar SR, Sheehan M, Fleischut MH, Siegel B, Arnold AG, Salo-Mullen EE, Hay JL, Offit K, Robson ME. Psychosocial factors associated with the uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162:297-306. [PMID: 28150129 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4123-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women who are newly diagnosed with breast cancer may consider contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to reduce their future risk of cancer in their unaffected breast. Pre-surgical BRCA1/2 genetic testing can provide valuable risk information to guide this choice. However, little is understood about why BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers, who are generally not at substantially elevated risk of contralateral disease, select CPM. METHODS We examined the uptake of CPM among breast cancer patients identified as BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers (n = 92) as part of a larger prospective study of the impact of pre-surgical BRCA1/2 testing. Data obtained from self-report questionnaires and patient medical records were used to examine associations between theoretically relevant background and psychosocial factors and BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers' decisions to undergo CPM. RESULTS Among BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers, 25% (n = 23) elected to undergo CPM. Psychosocial factors including a self-reported physician recommendation for CPM, greater perceived contralateral breast cancer risk, and greater perceived benefits of CPM were all significantly associated with the uptake of CPM. CONCLUSIONS A sizeable minority of BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers choose to undergo CPM after learning their mutation status through pre-surgical genetic testing. BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers' cognitive perceptions and social influences appear to be important in shaping their decisions regarding CPM. This work highlights the importance of several psychosocial factors in influencing patients' surgical decisions. Future research is needed that examines the formation of BRCA1/2 mutation noncarriers' beliefs regarding their disease and available treatment options, and that characterizes the physician-patient communication that occurs in this complex decision-making context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada G Hamilton
- Behavioral Sciences Service, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th floor, New York, 10022, NY, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Margaux C Genoff
- Behavioral Sciences Service, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th floor, New York, 10022, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Salerno
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Amoroso
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sherry R Boyar
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Sheehan
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan Harlan Fleischut
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Beth Siegel
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Angela G Arnold
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin E Salo-Mullen
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L Hay
- Behavioral Sciences Service, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th floor, New York, 10022, NY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Determinants of Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Services at a No-cost Reproductive Health Clinic Managed by Nurse-Midwives. Cancer Nurs 2016; 38:177-84. [PMID: 24831038 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of cervical cancer (CC) has been rising in sub-Saharan Africa, and health authorities in this region have responded by increasing the availability of cheap or no-cost CC screening services (CCSS), public health education, and others. However, the efforts have not yet resulted into the expected uptake of CCSS. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the determinants of uptake of CCSS at a no-cost reproductive health clinic managed by nurse-midwives. METHODS A descriptive design and a structured interview questionnaire were used to collect data from 236 women attending the reproductive health clinic. Logistic regression statistics were used to examine the determinants of uptake of CCSS. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 28.7 years, and only 29% had received CC screening. The significant determinants of uptake of CCSS were concern about the gender of the healthcare professional (HCP) (odds ratio [OR], 5.03; P = .001), age older than 25 years (OR, 3.09; P = .005), contraceptive use (OR, 0.28; P = .02), encouragement by HCPs (OR, 0.16; P = .00), and perceived quality of CCSS (OR, 0.08; P = .00). CONCLUSIONS Gender of the HCP and encouragement or reminders by the HCP influence uptake of CCSS. Because nurse-midwives have successfully led strategies to promote other integrated reproductive health services, they can also play a key role in enhancing uptake of CCSS in resource-poor settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Interventions to enhance service quality and deliberate policies requiring HCP to recommend encourage and remind clients may help to enhance uptake of CCSS in resource-poor settings.
Collapse
|
35
|
Partin MR, Lillie SE, White KM, Wilt TJ, Chrouser KL, Taylor BC, Burgess DJ. Similar perspectives on prostate cancer screening value and new guidelines across patient demographic and PSA level subgroups: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2016; 20:779-787. [PMID: 27807905 PMCID: PMC5513007 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening for all men. OBJECTIVE To inform educational materials addressing patient questions and concerns about the 2012 USPSTF guidelines, we sought to: (i) characterize patient perceptions about prostate cancer screening benefits, harms and recommendations against screening, and (ii) compare perceptions across race, age and PSA level subgroups. METHODS We conducted qualitative interviews with a sample of 26 men from the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, stratified by race (African American, other), age (50-69, 70-84) and PSA level (documented PSA level ≥4 in Veterans Health Administration electronic medical records vs no such documentation). We used an inductive approach informed by grounded theory to analyse transcribed interviews. RESULTS Most men in all subgroups expressed misperceptions about the benefits of prostate cancer screening and had difficulty identifying harms associated with screening. In all subgroups, reactions to recommendations against screening ranged from unconditionally receptive to highly resistant. Some men in every subgroup initially resistant to the idea said they would accept a recommendation to discontinue screening from their provider. CONCLUSIONS Given the similarity of perceptions and reactions across subgroups, materials targeted by race, age and PSA level may not be necessary. Efforts to inform decision making about prostate cancer screening should address misperceptions about benefits and lack of awareness of harms. Provider perspectives and recommendations may play a pivotal role in shaping patient reactions to new guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa R Partin
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Sarah E Lillie
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Katie M White
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy J Wilt
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristin L Chrouser
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Brent C Taylor
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Christy SM, Davis SN, Williams KR, Zhao X, Govindaraju SK, Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Lin HY, Sutton SK, Roethzeim RR, Shibata D, Meade CD, Gwede CK. A community-based trial of educational interventions with fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening uptake among blacks in community settings. Cancer 2016; 122:3288-3296. [PMID: 27420119 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Revised: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 05/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intervention studies among individuals in diverse community settings are needed to reduce health disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and mortality rates. The current study compared the efficacy of 2 intervention conditions promoting CRC screening among black individuals. METHODS Black individuals ages 50 to 75 years (N = 330) were recruited in community settings in 4 Tampa Bay counties. After obtaining consent and conducting a baseline interview to assess sociodemographic and health-related variables, participants received either a culturally targeted CRC photonovella booklet plus a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit or a standard CRC screening brochure plus an FIT kit. The primary outcome was FIT kit screening uptake. RESULTS FIT screening uptake at 6 months was 86.7% overall (90.3% in the brochure group and 81.9% in the photonovella group). Controlling for baseline between-group differences, there was no influence of intervention on FIT kit uptake (P = .756). Significant predictors of not returning an FIT kit included being unable to work (P = .010), having higher religious belief scores (P = .015), and living farther from the cancer center (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS Providing FIT kits and educational print materials to black individuals in community settings resulted in high rates of CRC screening. The study also identified subgroups of participants who were less likely to return an FIT kit and provides insight for future interventions. Cancer 2016;122:3288-3296. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M Christy
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Stacy N Davis
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kimberly R Williams
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Xiuhua Zhao
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Swapomthi K Govindaraju
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Hui-Yi Lin
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Steven K Sutton
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Richard R Roethzeim
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - David Shibata
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Cathy D Meade
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Clement K Gwede
- Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida. .,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Clarke N, Gallagher P, Kearney PM, McNamara D, Sharp L. Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study. Psychooncology 2016; 25:1456-1462. [PMID: 26864167 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Revised: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are increasingly being used in population-based colorectal cancer-screening programmes. Uptake of FIT is lower in men than women; however, the reasons for this are not well understood. We aimed to explore gender differences in influences on decisions to participate in FIT screening. METHODS This is a qualitative study using in-depth face-to-face interviews of four groups of screening invitees (male and female screening users and male and female screening non-users), purposively sampled from the database of a population-based FIT screening programme. Recruitment continued until saturation was reached. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis using the framework approach was employed with the theoretical domains framework guiding analysis. RESULTS Forty-seven screening invitees were interviewed. Six theoretical domains influenced screening uptake: 'environmental context and resources', 'beliefs about capabilities', 'beliefs about consequences', 'emotions', 'social influences' and 'knowledge'. Male non-users were often fatalistic, less knowledgeable and misinformed about cancer and FIT screening compared with other groups. Female non-users expressed negative attitudes, beliefs and emotions towards FIT screening, cancer, social influences and the medical profession and were over-confident about their health. CONCLUSIONS Negative attitudes and emotions to screening dominated non-user decision-making but differed by gender. Opportunities to improve uptake in men and women exist. Greater national discussions on the benefits of FIT screening, and development of screening materials tackling negative attitudes and beliefs while recognising male/female differences, may improve screening uptake. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Clarke
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Pamela Gallagher
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patricia M Kearney
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Linda Sharp
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland.,Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Han PKJ, Duarte CW, Daggett S, Siewers A, Killam B, Smith KA, Freedman AN. Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2015; 98:1280-1286. [PMID: 26227576 PMCID: PMC4573248 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2015] [Revised: 06/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate how personalized quantitative colorectal cancer (CRC) risk information affects laypersons' interest in CRC screening, and to explore factors influencing these effects. METHODS An online pre-post experiment was conducted in which a convenience sample (N=578) of laypersons, aged >50, were provided quantitative personalized estimates of lifetime CRC risk, calculated by the National Cancer Institute Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (CCRAT). Self-reported interest in CRC screening was measured immediately before and after CCRAT use; sociodemographic characteristics and prior CRC screening history were also assessed. Multivariable analyses assessed participants' change in interest in screening, and subgroup differences in this change. RESULTS Personalized CRC risk information had no overall effect on CRC screening interest, but significant subgroup differences were observed. Change in screening interest was greater among individuals with recent screening (p=.015), higher model-estimated cancer risk (p=.0002), and lower baseline interest (p<.0001), with individuals at highest baseline interest demonstrating negative (not neutral) change in interest. CONCLUSION Effects of quantitative personalized CRC risk information on laypersons' interest in CRC screening differ among individuals depending on prior screening history, estimated cancer risk, and baseline screening interest. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Personalized cancer risk information has personalized effects-increasing and decreasing screening interest in different individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul K J Han
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, USA.
| | - Christine W Duarte
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, USA
| | | | - Andrea Siewers
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, USA
| | | | - Kahsi A Smith
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, USA
| | - Andrew N Freedman
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Frey MK, Pauk SJ, Caputo TA, Moss HA, Sapra KJ, Gerber D, Stewart JD. Availability and scope of integrated screening for patients with Lynch syndrome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131:142-6. [PMID: 26365573 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Revised: 05/21/2015] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the availability and capacity of US-based integrated centers for the management of Lynch syndrome. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of practice patterns in the care of patients with Lynch syndrome was conducted at 33 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in the USA from March 1 to June 1, 2013. Each cancer center was contacted by telephone and the caller used a uniform scripted greeting and survey format. RESULTS All centers routinely recommended colonoscopy. Other recommended screening modalities were hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (29/33; 88%), endoscopy (27/33; 82%), urinalysis (23/33; 70%), endometrial sampling (21/33; 64%), dermatologic examination (19/32; 59%), pelvic ultrasonography (18/33; 55%), serum CA125 level (14/33; 42%), urine cytology (14/33; 42%), computed tomography (1/33; 3%), and magnetic resonance imaging (1/33; 3%). Each center had a multidisciplinary team but the composition varied. A designated team leader was present at 21 centers (64%). Having a team leader was associated with an increased likelihood of recommending endoscopy (P=0.04) and dermatologic surveillance (P=0.01). Only 23 centers (70%) had a system in place for communicating follow-up with patients. CONCLUSION The lack of consensus in practice patterns recorded among participating centers probably reflected the limited existing evidence on the usefulness of most screening modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K Frey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Sara J Pauk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas A Caputo
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haley A Moss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine J Sapra
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deanna Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua D Stewart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wools A, Dapper E, Leeuw JD. Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 2015; 26:158-68. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
41
|
Atkinson TM, Salz T, Touza KK, Li Y, Hay JL. Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Med 2015; 38:837-50. [PMID: 26280755 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9668-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Although health behavior theories postulate that risk perception should motivate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, this relationship is unclear. This meta-analysis aims to examine the relationship between CRC risk perception and screening behavior, while considering potential moderators and study quality. A search of six databases yielded 58 studies (63 effect sizes) that quantitatively assessed the relationship between CRC risk perception and screening behavior. Most included effect sizes (75 %) reported a positive association between CRC risk perception and screening behavior. A random effects meta-analysis yielded an overall effect size of z = 0.13 (95 % CI 0.10-0.16), which was heterogeneous (I (2) = 99 %, τ(2) = 0.01). Effect sizes from high-quality studies were significantly lower than those from lower quality studies (z = 0.02 vs. 0.16). We found a small, positive relationship between CRC risk perception and reported screening behavior, with important identified heterogeneity across moderators. Future studies should focus on high quality study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Atkinson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Talya Salz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Kaitlin K Touza
- Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Hay
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Myers RE, Ruth K, Manne SL, Cocroft J, Sifri R, Ziring B, Burgh D, Ross E, Weinberg DS. Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence. J Behav Med 2015; 38:777-86. [PMID: 25783675 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9626-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about the impact of genetic and environmental risk assessment (GERA) feedback on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In a recently completed randomized trial, primary care patients received GERA feedback based on a blood test for genetic polymorphisms and serum folate level (GERA Group) versus usual care (Control Group). Subsequently, participants were offered CRC screening. Among participants who received GERA feedback, being at elevated risk was negatively associated with prospective CRC screening adherence. Secondary analyses of data from this study were performed to identify independent predictors of adherence among participants who received GERA feedback. We obtained baseline survey, follow-up survey, and endpoint medical records data on sociodemographic background, knowledge, psychosocial characteristics, risk status, and adherence for 285 GERA Group participants. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of CRC screening adherence. Following a 6-month outcomes observation period, we also conducted two focus groups with GERA Group participants to assess their perceptions of GERA risk feedback and screening. Content analyses of focus group data were evaluated to gain insights into participant response to risk feedback. Overall, half of GERA Group participants adhered to screening within 6 months after randomization. Multivariable analyses showed a statistically significant interaction between race and GERA feedback status relative to screening adherence (p = 0.043). Among participants who received average risk feedback, adherence was comparable among whites (49.7 %) and nonwhites (54.1 %); however, among those at elevated risk, adherence was substantially higher among whites (66.7 %) compared to nonwhites (33.3 %). Focus group findings suggest that whites were more likely than nonwhites to view elevated risk feedback as a prompt to screen. In response to receiving elevated risk feedback, nonwhites were more likely than whites to report feeling anxiety about the likelihood of being diagnosed with CRC. Further research is needed to explore race-related CRC screening differences in response to GERA feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Ruth
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Randa Sifri
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Barry Ziring
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Eric Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Myers RE, Sifri R, Daskalakis C, DiCarlo M, Geethakumari PR, Cocroft J, Minnick C, Brisbon N, Vernon SW. Increasing colon cancer screening in primary care among African Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju344. [PMID: 25481829 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to determine the effect of preference-based tailored navigation on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence and related outcomes among African Americans (AAs). METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial that included 764 AA patients who were age 50 to 75 years, were eligible for CRC screening, and had received care through primary care practices in Philadelphia. Consented patients completed a baseline telephone survey and were randomized to either a Standard Intervention (SI) group (n = 380) or a Tailored Navigation Intervention (TNI) group (n = 384). The SI group received a mailed stool blood test kit plus colonoscopy instructions, and a reminder. The TNI group received tailored navigation (a mailed stool blood test kit or colonoscopy instructions based on preference, plus telephone navigation) and a reminder. A six-month survey and a 12-month medical records review were completed to assess screening adherence, change in overall screening preference, and perceptions about screening. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess intervention impact on outcomes. RESULTS At six months, adherence in the TNI group was statistically significantly higher than in the SI group (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.9). Positive change in overall screening preference was also statistically significantly greater in the TNI group compared with the SI group (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.3). There were no statistically significant differences in perceptions about screening between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS Tailored navigation in primary care is a promising approach for increasing CRC screening among AAs. Research is needed to determine how to maximize intervention effects and to test intervention impact on race-related disparities in mortality and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald E Myers
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV).
| | - Randa Sifri
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| | - Constantine Daskalakis
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| | - Melissa DiCarlo
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| | - Praveen Ramakrishnan Geethakumari
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| | - James Cocroft
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| | - Christopher Minnick
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| | - Nancy Brisbon
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| | - Sally W Vernon
- : Division of Population Science, Medical Oncology (REM, MD, JC), Department of Family and Community Medicine (RS, NB), and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (CD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network (PRG); Cancer Center, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA (CM); Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX (SWV)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Murphy CC, Vernon SW, Haddock NM, Anderson ML, Chubak J, Green BB. Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2014; 66:123-30. [PMID: 24937648 PMCID: PMC4209306 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2014] [Revised: 06/02/2014] [Accepted: 06/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Few studies use longitudinal data to identify predictors of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS). We examined predictors of (1) initial CRCS during the first year of a randomized trial, and (2) repeat CRCS during the second year of the trial among those that completed FOBT in Year 1. METHODS The sample comprised 1247 participants of the Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening (SOS) Trial (Group Health Cooperative, August 2008 to November 2011). Potential predictors of CRCS were identified with logistic regression and included sociodemographics, health history, and validated scales of psychosocial constructs. RESULTS Prior CRCS (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.99-3.52) and intervention group (Automated: OR 2.06 95% CI 1.43-2.95; Assisted: OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.69-6.03; Navigated: OR 5.64, 95% CI 3.74-8.49) were predictors of CRCS completion at Year 1. For repeat CRCS at Year 2, prior CRCS at baseline (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.25-3.11), intervention group (Automated: OR 9.27, 95% CI 4.56-18.82; Assisted: OR 11.17, 95% CI 5.44-22.94; Navigated: OR 13.10, 95% CI 6.33-27.08), and self-efficacy (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.00-1.73) were significant predictors. CONCLUSION Self-efficacy and prior CRCS are important predictors of future screening behavior. CRCS completion increased when access barriers were removed through interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin C Murphy
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sally W Vernon
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Nicole M Haddock
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zorzi M, Giorgi Rossi P, Cogo C, Falcini F, Giorgi D, Grazzini G, Mariotti L, Matarese V, Soppelsa F, Senore C, Ferro A. A comparison of different strategies used to invite subjects with a positive faecal occult blood test to a colonoscopy assessment. A randomised controlled trial in population-based screening programmes. Prev Med 2014; 65:70-6. [PMID: 24811759 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2013] [Revised: 04/23/2014] [Accepted: 04/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this parallel randomised controlled trial was to compare compliance with different modalities used to invite patients with a positive immunochemical faecal occult blood test (FIT+) for a total colonoscopy (TC). METHOD FIT+ patients from nine Italian colorectal cancer screening programmes were randomised to be invited for a TC initially by mail or by phone and, for non-compliers, to be recalled by mail, for counselling with a general practitioner, or to meet with a specialist screening practitioner (nurse or healthcare assistant). RESULTS In all, 3777 patients were randomised to different invitation strategies. Compliance with an initial invitation by mail and by phone was similar (86.0% vs. 84.0%, relative risk - RR: 1.02; 95%CI 0.97-1.08). Among non-responders to the initial invitation, compliance with a recall by appointment with a specialist practitioner was 50.4%, significantly higher than with a mail recall (38.1%; RR:1.33; 95%CI 1.01-1.76) or with a face-to-face counselling with the GP (30.8%; RR:1.45;95%CI 1.14-1.87). CONCLUSION Compliance with an initial invitation for a TC by mail and by phone was similar. A personal meeting with a specialist screening practitioner was associated with the highest compliance among non-compliers with initial invitations, while the involvement of GPs in this particular activity seemed less effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Zorzi
- Registro Tumori del Veneto, Passaggio Gaudenzio 1, Padova, Italy.
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Servizio Interaziendale Epidemiologia, Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia, via Amendola 2, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Carla Cogo
- Registro Tumori del Veneto, Passaggio Gaudenzio 1, Padova, Italy.
| | - Fabio Falcini
- Unità Operativa di Prevenzione Oncologica, Ospedale Civile G.B. Morgagni L. Pierantoni, AUSL di Forlì, via Forlanini 34, Forlì, Italy.
| | - Daniela Giorgi
- S.C. Epidemiologia e Screening, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 2 di Lucca, via per Sant'Alessio - Monte San Quirico, Lucca, Italy.
| | - Grazia Grazzini
- Screening Unit Cancer Prevention and Research Institute ISPO, via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, Firenze, Italy.
| | - Loretta Mariotti
- Laboratorio Unico di Screening, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 2 di Perugia, via XIV settembre 75, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Matarese
- Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, Cona-Ferrara, via Moro 8, Cona,FE, Italy.
| | - Fabio Soppelsa
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 1 di Belluno, via S. Andrea 8, Belluno, Italy.
| | - Carlo Senore
- Centro per la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO), via San Francesco da Paola 31, Torino, Italy.
| | - Antonio Ferro
- Dipartimento di Prevenzione, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 17 di Este Monselice, via Francesconi 2, Este,PD, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Williams NJ, Jean-Louis G, Brown CD, McFarlane SI, Boutin-Foster C, Ogedegbe G. Telephone-delivered behavioral intervention among blacks with sleep apnea and metabolic syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15:225. [PMID: 24925227 PMCID: PMC4066269 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2013] [Accepted: 05/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lack of adherence to recommended treatment for obstructive sleep apnea remains an ongoing public health challenge. Despite evidence that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is effective and improves overall quality of life, adherence with the use of CPAP in certain racial/ethnic groups, especially blacks, is suboptimal. Evidence indicates that the incidence and prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea are higher among blacks, relative to whites, and blacks are less likely to adhere to recommended treatment compared with other racial/ethnic groups. Methods Using a two-arm randomized controlled design, this study will evaluate the effectiveness of a culturally and linguistically tailored telephone-delivered intervention to promote adherence to physician-recommended sleep apnea assessment and treatment among blacks with metabolic syndrome, versus an attention-control arm. The intervention is designed to foster adherence to recommended sleep apnea care using the stages-of-change model. The intervention will be delivered entirely over the telephone. Participants in the intervention arm will receive 10 phone calls to address challenges and barriers to recommended care. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and at 6- and 12-months post-randomization. Discussion This tailored behavioral intervention will improve adherence to sleep apnea assessment and treatment among blacks with metabolic syndrome. We expect to demonstrate that this intervention modality is feasible in terms of time and cost and can be replicated in populations with similar racial/ethnic backgrounds. Trial registration The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01946659 (February 2013)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha J Williams
- Center for Healthful Behavior Change, Division of Health and Behavior, Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th St, 10016 New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lairson DR, Dicarlo M, Deshmuk AA, Fagan HB, Sifri R, Katurakes N, Cocroft J, Sendecki J, Swan H, Vernon SW, Myers RE. Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care. Cancer 2014; 120:1042-9. [PMID: 24435411 PMCID: PMC3961516 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Revised: 11/18/2013] [Accepted: 11/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is cost-effective but underused. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a mailed standard intervention (SI) and tailored navigation interventions (TNIs) to increase CRC screening use in the context of a randomized trial among primary care patients. METHODS Participants (n = 945) were randomized either to a usual care control group (n = 317), to an SI group (n = 316), or to a TNI group (n = 312). The SI group was sent both colonoscopy instructions and stool blood tests irrespective of baseline preference. TNI group participants were sent instructions for scheduling a colonoscopy, a stool blood test, or both based on their test preference, as determined at baseline; then, they received a navigation telephone call. Activity cost estimation was used to determine the cost of each intervention and to compute incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Statistical uncertainty within the base case was assessed with 95% confidence intervals derived from net benefit regression analysis. The effects of uncertain parameters, such as the cost of planning, training, and involvement of those receiving "investigator salaries," were assessed with sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Program costs of the SI were $167 per participant. The average cost of the TNI was $289 per participant. CONCLUSIONS The TNI was more effective than the SI but substantially increased the cost per additional individual screened. Decision-makers need to consider cost structure, level of planning, and training required to implement these 2 intervention strategies and their willingness to pay for additional individuals screened to determine whether a tailored navigation would be justified and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Lairson
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gimeno Garcia AZ, Hernandez Alvarez Buylla N, Nicolas-Perez D, Quintero E. Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake. ISRN ONCOLOGY 2014; 2014:425787. [PMID: 24729896 PMCID: PMC3963118 DOI: 10.1155/2014/425787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2013] [Accepted: 12/31/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer ranks as one of the most incidental and death malignancies worldwide. Colorectal cancer screening has proven its benefit in terms of incidence and mortality reduction in randomized controlled trials. In fact, it has been recommended by medical organizations either in average-risk or family-risk populations. Success of a screening campaign highly depends on how compliant the target population is. Several factors influence colorectal cancer screening uptake including sociodemographics, provider and healthcare system factors, and psychosocial factors. Awareness of the target population of colorectal cancer and screening is crucial in order to increase screening participation rates. Knowledge about this disease and its prevention has been used across studies as a measurement of public awareness. Some studies found a positive relationship between knowledge about colorectal cancer, risk perception, and attitudes (perceived benefits and barriers against screening) and willingness to participate in a colorectal cancer screening campaign. The mentioned factors are modifiable and therefore susceptible of intervention. In fact, interventional studies focused on average-risk population have tried to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake by improving public knowledge and modifying attitudes. In the present paper, we reviewed the factors impacting adherence to colorectal cancer screening and interventions targeting participants for increasing screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Z Gimeno Garcia
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Unidad de Endoscopia, La Laguna, 38320 Tenerife, Spain ; Departamento de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Unidad de Endoscopia, Ofra s/n, La Laguna, 38320 Tenerife, Spain
| | - Noemi Hernandez Alvarez Buylla
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Unidad de Endoscopia, La Laguna, 38320 Tenerife, Spain
| | - David Nicolas-Perez
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Unidad de Endoscopia, La Laguna, 38320 Tenerife, Spain
| | - Enrique Quintero
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Unidad de Endoscopia, La Laguna, 38320 Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Coups EJ, Stapleton JL, Manne SL, Hudson SV, Medina-Forrester A, Rosenberg SA, Gordon M, Tatum KS, Robinson JK, Natale-Pereira A, Goydos JS. Psychosocial correlates of sun protection behaviors among U.S. Hispanic adults. J Behav Med 2014; 37:1082-90. [PMID: 24532153 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-014-9558-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2013] [Accepted: 02/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of skin cancer among U.S. Hispanics increased 1.3% annually from 1992 to 2008. However, little research has focused on skin cancer prevention among the rapidly growing Hispanic population. In this study, we examined theory-driven, psychosocial correlates of sun protection behaviors in a population-based sample of 787 Hispanic adults (49.6% female, mean age = 41.0 years) residing in five southern or western U.S. states. Participants completed an English- or Spanish-language online survey in September 2011. The outcomes of focus were sunscreen use, shade seeking, and use of sun protective clothing. The correlates included suntan benefits, sun protection benefits and barriers, skin color preference, perceived natural skin protection, photo-aging concerns, perceived skin cancer risk, skin cancer worry, skin cancer fatalism, and sun protection descriptive norms. Results of multiple linear regression analyses revealed the following: sun protection barriers were negatively associated with each outcome; descriptive norms were positively associated with each outcome; perceived natural skin protection was inversely associated with sunscreen use; skin cancer worry was positively associated with shade seeking and use of sun protective clothing; skin cancer fatalism was negatively associated with shade seeking; and skin color preference was negatively associated with use of sun protective clothing. A number of additional statistically significant associations were identified in bivariate correlation analyses. This study informs the potential content of interventions to promote engagement in sun protection behaviors among U.S. Hispanics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot J Coups
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Christy SM, Mosher CE, Rawl SM. Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior. Am J Mens Health 2014; 8:54-65. [PMID: 23813927 PMCID: PMC3849215 DOI: 10.1177/1557988313492171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer deaths among men in the United States. Although CRC screening has been found to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, current screening rates among men are suboptimal due to various practical and psychosocial barriers. One potential barrier to CRC screening identified in qualitative studies with men is the threat to masculinity that endoscopic screening methods pose. Indeed, beliefs about masculinity have been predictive of other preventive health behaviors among men. In this review article, we propose a novel conceptual framework to explain men's CRC screening behavior that integrates masculinity norms, gender role conflict, men's health care experiences, behaviors, and beliefs, and social and background variables. This framework has the potential to guide future research on men's CRC screening behaviors and other health behaviors and may inform gender-sensitive interventions that target masculinity beliefs to increase preventive health behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M Christy
- 1Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|