1
|
Rajagopal S, Yao X, Abadir W, Baetz TD, Easson A, Knight G, McWhirter E, Nessim C, Rosen CF, Sun A, Wright FC, Petrella TM. Surveillance evaluations in patients with stage I, II, III, or resectable IV melanoma who were treated with curative intent: A systematic review. Surg Oncol 2024; 54:102077. [PMID: 38657486 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Appropriate surveillance of patients with melanoma treated with curative intent is vital to improve patient outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to capture locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease, and to evaluate the effectiveness of various surveillance strategies. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Database were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies reporting at least one patient-related outcome were included. Exclusion criteria included: published in non-English or recruited >20 % or an uncertain percentage of non-target patients without conducting a subgroup analysis for the target patients. This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021246482). RESULTS Among 17,978 publications from the literature search, one RCT and five non-randomized comparative studies were included and comprised 4016 patients. The aggregate evidence certainty was low for the RCT and very low for the comparative studies, as assessed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. For patients with stage IA-IIC melanoma, a reduced follow-up schedule with clinical follow-up strategies alone may be safe and cost-effective. For stage IIC-IIIC patients, at least two serial PET/CT or whole-body CT and brain MRI imaging within a median follow-up of 31.2 months may detect 50 % of recurrences that lead to additional management, such as surgery. PET/CT may have a higher positive predictive value and lower false positive rate compared with CT alone in detecting recurrence in stage I-III patients. CONCLUSION Surveillance protocols should be based on individual risk of recurrence and established best practices when formulating follow-up strategies, as suggested by the studies reviewed. Future high-quality studies are needed to clarify the frequency of imaging follow-up strategies, especially in patients with high-risk stage II melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudha Rajagopal
- Trillium Health Partners, Credit Valley Hospital, Peel Regional Cancer Centre, 2200 Eglinton Ave West, Mississauga, Ontario L5M 7S4, Canada.
| | - Xiaomei Yao
- Department of Oncology, Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada; Program in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C3, Canada.
| | - Wadid Abadir
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Tara D Baetz
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, 25 King Street West, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9, Canada.
| | - Alexandra Easson
- Department of Surgery, Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.
| | - Gregory Knight
- Department of Oncology, Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Grand River Hospital, 835 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3, Canada.
| | - Elaine McWhirter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2, Canada.
| | - Carolyn Nessim
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
| | - Cheryl F Rosen
- Division of Dermatology, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada.
| | - Alexander Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - Frances C Wright
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Teresa M Petrella
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manne S, Heckman CJ, Frederick S, Schaefer AA, Studts CR, Khavjou O, Honeycutt A, Berger A, Liu H. A Digital Intervention to Improve Skin Self-Examination Among Survivors of Melanoma: Protocol for a Type-1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e52689. [PMID: 38345836 PMCID: PMC10897801 DOI: 10.2196/52689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although melanoma survival rates have improved in recent years, survivors remain at risk of recurrence, second primary cancers, and keratinocyte carcinomas. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends skin examinations by a physician every 3 to 12 months. Regular thorough skin self-examinations (SSEs) are recommended for survivors of melanoma to promote the detection of earlier-stage, thinner melanomas, which are associated with improved survival and lower treatment costs. Despite their importance, less than a quarter of survivors of melanoma engage in SSEs. OBJECTIVE Previously, our team developed and evaluated a web-based, fully automated intervention called mySmartSkin (MSS) that successfully improved SSE among survivors of melanoma. Enhancements were proposed to improve engagement with and outcomes of MSS. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and methodology for a type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial evaluating the enhanced MSS versus control and exploring implementation outcomes and contextual factors. METHODS This study will recruit from state cancer registries and social media 300 individuals diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma between 3 months and 5 years after surgery who are currently cancer free. Participants will be randomly assigned to either enhanced MSS or a noninteractive educational web page. Surveys will be collected from both arms at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months to assess measures of intervention engagement, barriers, self-efficacy, habit, and SSE. The primary outcome is thorough SSE. The secondary outcomes are the diagnosis of new or recurrent melanomas and sun protection practices. RESULTS Multilevel modeling will be used to examine whether there are significant differences in survivor outcomes between MSS and the noninteractive web page over time. Mixed methods will evaluate reach, adoption, implementation (including costs), and potential for maintenance of MSS, as well as contextual factors relevant to those outcomes and future scale-up. CONCLUSIONS This trial has the potential to improve outcomes in survivors of melanoma. If MSS is effective, the results could guide its implementation in oncology care and nonprofit organizations focused on skin cancers. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/52689.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Manne
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Sara Frederick
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Alexis A Schaefer
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Christina R Studts
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Olga Khavjou
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | | | - Adam Berger
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Hao Liu
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walsh EA, Popok PJ, Ream M, Bainter S, Perdomo D, Taub C, Saez-Clarke E, Kesmodel S, Blomberg BB, Antoni MH. Predictors of initial engagement with an asynchronous cognitive behavioral stress management website among older women with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:466. [PMID: 37452882 PMCID: PMC11051687 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07939-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Digital interventions, like websites, offer greater access to psychosocial treatments; however, engagement is often suboptimal. Initial use may be a target to "hook" participants. Few studies examine engagement with cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM). We tested predictors of engagement in the first week of using a CBSM website among women with breast cancer (BC). METHODS Older women (≥ 50 years) with nonmetastatic BC enrolled in an on-going trial (8/2016-4/2022, #NCT03955991) and were randomized to receive 10 synchronous, virtual CBSM group sessions immediately (n = 41) or after a 6-month waitlist (n = 34). All received simultaneous access to an asynchronous website, where supplemental videos and resources were released weekly. Engagement was tracked via breadth (features used) and depth (clicks within content). Multilevel modeling tested predictors of engagement (i.e., time, condition, age, daily stress, depression, race, ethnicity, disease stage). RESULTS Breadth decreased over the first week of CBSM (b = -0.93, p < .01), and women with more advanced stage disease engaged with more breadth (b = 0.52, p < .01) and depth (b = 14.06, p < .01) than women with earlier stage disease. Non-Hispanic (b = -0.59, p = .03) and White (b = -0.97, p < .01) women engaged with more features. Cancer stage and intervention timing interacted. Women with more advanced cancer stage who received CBSM later engaged with the most depth (b = -11.73, p = .04). All other characteristics did not predict engagement. CONCLUSIONS Disease stage, race, ethnicity, and intervention timing predicted engagement with a CBSM website in older BC patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Delivering CBSM later in cancer treatment may mitigate competing demands. Fostering greater engagement in racial/ethnic minorities is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Walsh
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Fifth Floor Coral, Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
| | - Paula J Popok
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Fifth Floor Coral, Gables, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Molly Ream
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Fifth Floor Coral, Gables, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Sierra Bainter
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Fifth Floor Coral, Gables, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Dolores Perdomo
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Chloe Taub
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Estefany Saez-Clarke
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Fifth Floor Coral, Gables, FL, 33146, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Susan Kesmodel
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Bonnie B Blomberg
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Microbiology/Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael H Antoni
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Fifth Floor Coral, Gables, FL, 33146, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geller AC, Coroiu A, Keske RR, Haneuse S, Davine JA, Emmons KM, Daniel CL, Gibson TM, McDonald AJ, Robison LL, Mertens AC, Elkin EB, Marghoob A, Armstrong GT. Advancing Survivors Knowledge (ASK Study) of Skin Cancer Surveillance After Childhood Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2269-2280. [PMID: 36623247 PMCID: PMC10448942 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve skin cancer screening among survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiotherapy where skin cancers make up 58% of all subsequent neoplasms. Less than 30% of survivors currently complete recommended skin cancer screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial evaluated patient and provider activation (PAE + MD) and patient and provider activation with teledermoscopy (PAE + MD + TD) compared with patient activation alone (PAE), which included print materials, text messaging, and a website on skin cancer risk factors and screening behaviors. Seven hundred twenty-eight participants from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (median age at baseline 44 years), age > 18 years, treated with radiotherapy as children, and without previous history of skin cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1). Primary outcomes included receiving a physician skin examination at 12 months and conducting a skin self-examination at 18 months after intervention. RESULTS Rates of physician skin examinations increased significantly from baseline to 12 months in all three intervention groups: PAE, 24%-39%, relative risk [RR], 1.65, 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.08; PAE + MD, 24% to 39%, RR, 1.56, 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.97; PAE + MD + TD, 24% to 46%, RR, 1.89, 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.37. The increase in rates did not differ between groups (P = .49). Similarly, rates of skin self-examinations increased significantly from baseline to 18 months in all three groups: PAE, 29% to 50%, RR, 1.75, 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.16; PAE + MD, 31% to 58%, RR, 1.85, 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.26; PAE + MD + TD, 29% to 58%, RR, 1.95, 95% CI, 1.59 to 2.40, but the increase in rates did not differ between groups (P = .43). CONCLUSION Although skin cancer screening rates increased more than 1.5-fold in each of the intervention groups, there were no differences between groups. Any of these interventions, if implemented, could improve skin cancer prevention behaviors among childhood cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan C. Geller
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Adina Coroiu
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Robyn R. Keske
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Sebastien Haneuse
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica A. Davine
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Karen M. Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Casey L. Daniel
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Todd M. Gibson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Aaron J. McDonald
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Leslie L. Robison
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Ann C. Mertens
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Elena B. Elkin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY
| | - Ashfaq Marghoob
- Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gregory T. Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ackermann DM, Bracken K, Janda M, Turner RM, Hersch JK, Drabarek D, Bell KJL. Strategies to Improve Adherence to Skin Self-examination and Other Self-management Practices in People at High Risk of Melanoma: A Scoping Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol 2023; 159:432-440. [PMID: 36857048 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Importance Adherence, both in research trials and in clinical practice, is crucial to the success of interventions. There is limited guidance on strategies to increase adherence and the measurement and reporting of adherence in trials of melanoma self-management practices. Objective This scoping review aimed to describe (1) strategies to improve adherence to self-management practices in randomized clinical trials of people at high risk of melanoma and (2) measurement and reporting of adherence data in these trials. Evidence Review Four databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL, were searched from inception to July 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials of self-monitoring interventions for early detection of melanoma in people at increased risk due to personal history (eg, melanoma, transplant, dysplastic naevus syndrome), family history of melanoma, or as determined by a risk assessment tool or clinical judgment. Findings From 939 records screened, 18 eligible randomized clinical trials were identified, ranging in size from 40 to 724 participants, using a range of adherence strategies but with sparse evidence on effectiveness of the strategies. Strategies were classified as trial design (n = 15); social and economic support (n = 5); intervention design (n = 18); intervention and condition support (n = 10); and participant support (n = 18). No strategies were reported for supporting underserved groups (eg, people who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, have low health literacy, non-English speakers, or older adults) to adhere to self-monitoring practices, and few trials targeted provider (referring to both clinicians and researchers) adherence (n = 5). Behavioral support tools included reminders (n = 8), priority-setting guidance (n = 5), and clinician feedback (n = 5). Measurement of adherence was usually by participant report of skin self-examination practice with some recent trials of digital interventions also directly measuring adherence to the intervention through website or application analytic data. Reporting of adherence data was limited, and fewer than half of all reports mentioned adherence in their discussion. Conclusions and Relevance Using an adaptation of the World Health Organization framework for clinical adherence, this scoping review of randomized clinical trials identified key concepts as well as gaps in the way adherence is approached in design, conduct, and reporting of trials for skin self-examination and other self-management practices in people at high risk of melanoma. These findings may usefully guide future trials and clinical practice; evaluation of adherence strategies may be possible using a Study Within A Trial (SWAT) framework within host trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deonna M Ackermann
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Bracken
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robin M Turner
- Biostatistics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Jolyn K Hersch
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dorothy Drabarek
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katy J L Bell
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vogel RI, Luo X, Brown K, Jewett P, Dona AC, Nagler RH, Ahmed RL, Martinson BC, Lazovich D. A UVR-sensor wearable device intervention to reduce sun exposure in melanoma survivors: Results from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281480. [PMID: 36763627 PMCID: PMC9916644 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma survivors are at increased risk of developing a second primary melanoma; however, some report sub-optimal sun behaviors and sunburns. We tested the effectiveness of a wearable device with ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-sensing technology to improve sun behaviors and reduce sunburns in cutaneous melanoma survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial using Shade 2, a commercially available wrist device that measures UVR. The intervention group received the device and mobile application notifications about their exposure and prompts to use sunscreen. The control group received the device and a separate research mobile application without information about their exposure or notifications. Participants wore the device for 12 weeks and self-reported sun behaviors before, during, and after the intervention. The primary outcome was a composite score of sun protection behaviors at week 12. RESULTS 386 participants were randomized (186 control, 182 intervention). Most were female and 5+ years past their first melanoma diagnosis. The average age was 56 years. Most (93%) completed the study, though 40% experienced device issues. No meaningful differences were observed in self-reported sun protection behaviors at week 12 (controls 3.0±0.5 vs. intervention 2.9±0.5, p = 0.06), any sunburn during the intervention period (controls 14.4% vs. intervention 12.7%, p = 0.75), or average daily objective UVR exposure (controls median 87 vs. intervention 83 J/m2, p = 0.43). CONCLUSION Wearing a device that measured and alerted melanoma survivors to UVR exposure did not result in different sun behaviors, exposure, or sunburns relative to controls. The technology needs refinement before further attempts to assess the effectiveness of self-monitoring UVR exposure. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT03927742.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Isaksson Vogel
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Xianghua Luo
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Katherine Brown
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Patricia Jewett
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Allison C. Dona
- Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Rebekah H. Nagler
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Hubbard School of Journalism & Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Rehana L. Ahmed
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Brian C. Martinson
- HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, United States of America
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - DeAnn Lazovich
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hewitt RM, Ploszajski M, Purcell C, Pattinson R, Jones B, Wren GH, Hughes O, Ridd MJ, Thompson AR, Bundy C. A mixed methods systematic review of digital interventions to support the psychological health and well-being of people living with dermatological conditions. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1024879. [PMID: 36405626 PMCID: PMC9669071 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1024879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dermatological conditions can have a substantial impact on psychological as well as physical health yet dedicated face-to-face psychological support for patients is lacking. Thus, individuals may require additional support to self-manage dermatological conditions effectively. Digital technology can contribute to long-term condition management, but knowledge of the effectiveness of digital interventions addressing psychological (cognitive, emotional, and behavioural) aspects of dermatological conditions is limited. Objectives To identify, determine the effectiveness, and explore people’s views and experiences of digital interventions supporting the psychological health of people with dermatological conditions. Methods A mixed methods systematic review informed by JBI methodology. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Eight electronic databases were searched for papers written between January 2002 and October 2021. Data screening and extraction were conducted in Covidence. The methodological quality of studies were scrutinised against JBI critical appraisal tools. Intervention characteristics were captured using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist and guide. Data were synthesised using a convergent segregated approach. The results were reported in a narrative summary. Results Twenty-three papers were identified from 4,883 references, including 15 randomised controlled trials. Nineteen interventions were condition-specific, 13 were delivered online, 16 involved an educational component, and 7 endorsed established, evidence-based therapeutic approaches. Improvements in knowledge, mood, quality of life, the therapeutic relationship, and reduced disease severity in the short to medium term, were reported, although there was substantial heterogeneity within the literature. Thirteen studies captured feedback from users, who considered various digital interventions as convenient and helpful for improving knowledge, emotion regulation, and personal control, but technical and individual barriers to use were reported. Use of established qualitative methodologies was limited and, in some cases, poorly reported. Conclusion Some web-based digital psychological interventions seem to be acceptable to people living with mainly psoriasis and eczema. Whilst some digital interventions benefitted cognitive and emotional factors, heterogeneity and inconsistencies in the literature meant definitive statements about their effectiveness could not be drawn. Interdisciplinary and patient-centred approaches to research are needed to develop and test quality digital interventions supporting the psychological health of adults living with common and rare dermatological conditions. Systematic review registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=285435], identifier [CRD42021285435].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael M. Hewitt
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Wales Centre for Evidence Based Care–A JBI Centre of Excellence, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Rachael M. Hewitt,
| | | | - Catherine Purcell
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael Pattinson
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Bethan Jones
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Georgina H. Wren
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Hughes
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew J. Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew R. Thompson
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- South Wales Clinical Psychology Training Programme, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board – School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Bundy
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Manne S, Heckman CJ, Kashy D, Ritterband L, Thorndike F, Lozada C, Coups EJ. Moderators of the Effects of mySmartSkin, a Web-Based Intervention to Promote Skin Self-examination and Sun Protection Among Individuals Diagnosed With Melanoma. Ann Behav Med 2022; 56:804-815. [PMID: 35028656 PMCID: PMC9345181 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying the characteristics of persons who benefit more from behavioral interventions can help health care providers decide which individuals should be offered particular interventions because this is the subgroup of persons who are more likely to derive greater benefit from the intervention and refine the underlying constructs of the model guiding the intervention. PURPOSE This study evaluated possible demographic, medical, knowledge and attitudinal, and psychosocial variables that may moderate the impact of an online intervention, called mySmartSkin (MSS), on engagement in skin self-examination (SSE) and sun protection behaviors among melanoma survivors. METHODS Participants completed a baseline survey and were then randomized to the MSS condition or usual care. Follow-up surveys were completed by participants at 8-, 24-, and 48-week postrandomization. RESULTS A greater impact of MSS on SSE was illustrated among participants with more phenotypic skin cancer risk factors and participants reporting lower baseline self-efficacy in conducting SSE. A more favorable response of MSS on sun protection behaviors was shown when initial knowledge about abnormal lesions and sun protection barriers were high. Greater use of MSS and more favorable evaluations of it were also associated with higher intervention response. CONCLUSIONS Future studies seeking to improve SSE and sun protection among melanoma survivors might benefit from focusing on survivors who report more skin cancer risk factors, lower self-efficacy in conducting SSE, less knowledge about what abnormal skin lesions look like, more perceived barriers to sun protection behaviors, and less worry about recurrence and cancer-related distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carolyn J Heckman
- Department of Medicine, Behavioral Sciences, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Deborah Kashy
- Michigan State University, Department of Psychology, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Lee Ritterband
- School of Medicine, Center for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Carolina Lozada
- Department of Medicine, Behavioral Sciences, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|