What happens when predators do not completely consume their prey?

Specialized feeding modes promote coexistence of competing herbivores: insights from a metabolic pool model

Competition theory suggests that a single resource should support one consumer species. However, competitive exclusion may be relaxed by periodic disturbances, temporal or spatial segregation of consumers, or fine-scale resource partitioning. This last mechanism may be especially common for competing phytophagous insects. Unlike many predators, herbivores rarely consume their entire prey item and often have specialized feeding modes on specific plant parts. Thus, different herbivore guilds may "avoid" each other, thereby facilitating their coexistence. I analyzed a simplified metabolic pool model that includes two herbivore types: a "leaf chewer" and a "phloem feeder." Phytophagous insects with the same feeding mode never coexisted, but different guilds may coexist stably-depending on productivity of the carbohydrate pool, allocation to vegetative biomass, and defoliation rate. Differences in herbivore feeding mode are equivalent to fine scale resource partitioning, potentially within the individual plant. Thus, the addition of physiological detail changes the predictions of simple competition models and is relevant to weed biocontrol by informing decisions on which guilds of biocontrol agents to introduce.

Seed-cache exchange promotes coexistence and coupled consumer oscillations: a model of desert rodents as resource processors

Most models of resource competition assume that coexistence of consumers depends on tradeoffs in their abilities to exploit shared resources along dimensions of environmental heterogeneity generated by factors external to the consumers. However, consumers may create heterogeneity themselves by modifying resources that they do not immediately consume; such "resource processing" is predicted to allow coexistence if consumers vary in use of resources in primary vs. modified form. To explore whether external food storage (caching) represents a form of resource processing that contributes to observed patterns of species coexistence, we developed a biologically explicit simulation model of competition for a well-studied system, seed-eating desert heteromyid rodents. Here we present the model, compare competitive outcomes with and without inter-specific exchange of cached food, and describe population dynamics of coexisting competitors. The model predicts stable coexistence only when there is exchange of cached seeds via scavenging of caches left undefended by mortality or by pilferage of defended caches. Net interactions between coexisting consumers ranged from competition (10% of cases) to host-parasite (77%), commensalism (12%), and mutualism (1%). Population dynamics of coexisting consumers often showed strong periodicity and coupled synchronous or slightly lagged cycles, a possibility not previously anticipated for desert rodents occupying constant environments. Our model confirms that caching does represent a form of resource processing likely to play a significant role in the dynamics and diversity of communities of desert rodents and other caching animals.

Grazers and Diggers: Exploitation Competition and Coexistence among Foragers with Different Feeding Strategies on a Single Resource

A mathematical model is presented that describes a system where two consumer species compete exploitatively for a single renewable resource. The resource is distributed in a patchy but homogeneous environment; that is, all patches are intrinsically identical. The two consumer species are referred to as diggers and grazers, where diggers deplete the resource within a patch to lower densities than grazers. We show that the two distinct feeding strategies can produce a heterogeneous resource distribution that enables their coexistence. Coexistence requires that grazers must either move faster than diggers between patches or convert the resources to population growth much more efficiently than diggers. The model shows that the functional form of resource renewal within a patch is also important for coexistence. These results contrast with theory that considers exploitation competition for a single resource when the resource is assumed to be well mixed throughout the system.

Evolutionarily Stable Strategies for Consuming a Structured Resource

A general consumer-resource model assuming discrete consumers and a continuously structured resource is examined. We study two foraging behaviors, which lead to fixed and flexible patch residence times, in conjunction with a simple consumer energetics model linking resource consumption, foraging behavior, and metabolic costs. Results indicate a single, evolutionarily stable foraging strategy for fixed and flexible foraging in a nonspatial environment, but flexible foraging in a spatial environment leads to consumer grouping, which affects the resource distribution such that no single foraging strategy can exclude all other strategies. This evolutionarily stable coexistence of multiple foraging strategies may help explain a dichotomous pattern observed in a wide variety of natural systems.