Selective lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer--a prospective study for impact on staging, limitations and pitfalls

Lymphatic Mapping in Colon Cancer Depending on Injection Time and Tracing Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Designed Studies

An optimized lymph node yield leads to better survival in colon cancer, but extended lymphadenectomy is not associated with survival benefits. Lymphatic mapping shows several colon cancers feature aberrant drainage pathways inducing local recurrence when not resected. Currently, different protocols exist for lymphatic mapping procedures. This meta-analysis assessed which protocol has the best capacity to detect tumor-draining and possibly metastatic lymph nodes. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, including prospective trials with in vivo tracer application. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Traced lymph nodes, total resected lymph nodes, and aberrant drainage detection rate were analyzed. Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 42 searched for aberrant drainage. While a preoperative tracer injection significantly increased the traced lymph node rates compared to intraoperative tracing (30.1% (15.4, 47.3) vs. 14.1% (11.9, 16.5), p = 0.03), no effect was shown for the tracer used (p = 0.740) or the application sites comparing submucosal and subserosal injection (22.9% (14.1, 33.1) vs. 14.3% (12.1, 16.8), p = 0.07). Preoperative tracer injection resulted in a significantly higher rate of detected aberrant lymph nodes compared to intraoperative injection (26.3% [95% CI 11.5, 44.0] vs. 2.5% [95% CI 0.8, 4.7], p < 0.001). Analyzing 112 individual patient datasets from eight studies revealed a significant impact on aberrant drainage detection for injection timing, favoring preoperative over intraoperative injection (OR 0.050 [95% CI 0.010-0.176], p < 0.001) while indocyanine green presented itself as the superior tracer (OR 0.127 [95% CI 0.018-0.528], p = 0.012). Optimized lymphatic mapping techniques result in significantly higher detection of aberrant lymphatic drainage patterns and thus enable a personalized approach to reducing local recurrence.

Technique and clinical consequences of sentinel lymph node biopsy in colorectal cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is a controversial issue. Different detection techniques, various protocols for the histopathological work-up of the SLN and a greatly differing experience between the investigators make the comparison of the available studies problematic. Nevertheless, it is clear, that the successful clinical application of SLNB in breast cancer and melanoma cannot simply be transferred into colorectal cancer treatment. In this paper we try to define the current status of clinical application of this technique in CRC by means of a literature review and our own experience. Moreover, the background and the potential clinical implications of additionally small tumor deposits in the SLN (so-called "upstaging") is critically reviewed. Summarizing the results, it is clear, that the value of SLNB in CRC is still unclear. If current techniques are to be applied outside a study protocol and no patient selection is performed the correct identification of macrometastases needs further investigation. Although still under debate, there is otherwise growing evidence, that -at least if RT-PCR-techniques are used- the detection of small tumor deposits in the SLN may be of prognostic and therefore clinical value. Future studies should focus on two subjects: First, alternative detection techniques and careful patient selection may clarify, if an improvement of the sensitivity to detect macrometastases is feasible. Second, large prospective trials using a standardized histopathological lymph node assessment should compare SLN and Non-SLN for its incidence to bear small tumor deposits. If SLNB proves to be sensitive, the prognostic and predictive value of these additional findings should be clarified.

RT-PCR and immunohistochemical evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes after in vivo mapping with Patent Blue V in colon cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Lymph node status is the most important predictive factor in the treatment of colorectal cancer. As sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy might upstage stage II colon cancer, it could have therapeutic consequences in the future. We investigated the feasibility of in vivo SLN detection with Patent Blue V dye and evaluated nodal microstaging and ultrastaging using cytokeratin immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 30 consecutive patients operated on for colon cancer, subserosal injection with Patent Blue dye was used for SLN detection in four different hospitals under the supervision of one regional coordinator. In searching for occult micrometastases, each SLN was examined at three levels. In tumor-negative SLNs at routine hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) examination (pN0) we performed CK8/CK18 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 29 out of 30 patients (97%). The SLN was negative in 18 patients detected by H&E and IHC. In 16 patients the non-SLN was also negative, leading to a negative predictive value of 89% and an accuracy of 93%. Upstaging occurred in 10 patients (33%) - 7 by IHC and 3 by RT-PCR. Aberrant lymphatic drainage was seen in 3 patients (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

The SLN concept in colon carcinoma using Patent Blue V is feasible and accurate. It leads to upstaging of nodal status in 33% of patients when IHC and PCR techniques are combined. Therefore, the clinical value of SLN should be the subject of further studies.