Implementation of Clinical Phosphoproteomics and Proteomics for Personalized Medicine

Omics approaches: Role in acute myeloid leukemia biomarker discovery and therapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia in adults and has the highest fatality rate. Patients aged 65 and above exhibit the poorest prognosis, with a mere 30 % survival rate within one year. One important issue in optimizing outcomes for AML patients is their limited ability to predict responses to specific therapies, response duration, and likelihood of relapse. Despite rigorous therapeutic interventions, a significant proportion of patients experience relapse. Consequently, there is a pressing need to introduce new targets for therapy. Sequencing and biotechnology have come a long way in the last ten years. This has made it easier for many omics technologies, like genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, to study molecular mechanisms of AML. An integrative approach is necessary to understand a complex biological process fully and offers an important opportunity to understand the information underlying diseases. In this review, we studied papers published between 2010 and 2024 employing omics approaches encompassing diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification of AML. Finally, we discuss prospects and challenges in applying -omics technologies to the discovery of novel biomarkers and therapy targets. Our review may be helpful for omics researchers who want to study AML from different molecular aspects.

Phosphoproteomics identifies determinants of PAK inhibitor sensitivity in leukaemia cells

BACKGROUND

The P21 activated kinases (PAK) are frequently dysregulated in cancer and have central roles in oncogenic signalling, prompting the development of PAK inhibitors (PAKi) as anticancer agents. However, such compounds have not reached clinical use because, at least partially, there is a limited mechanistic understanding of their mode of action. Here, we aimed to characterize functional and molecular responses to PAKi (PF-3758309, FRAX-486 and IPA-3) in multiple acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) models to gain insights on the biochemical pathways affected by these inhibitors in this disease and identify determinants of response in patient samples.

METHODS

We mined phosphoproteomic datasets of primary AML, and used proteomics and phosphoproteomics to profile PAKi impact in immortalized (P31/Fuj and MV4-11), and primary AML cells from 8 AML patients. These omics datasets were integrated with gene dependency data to identify which proteins targeted by PAKi are necessary for the proliferation of AML. We studied the effect PAKi on cell cycle progression, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Finally, we used phosphoproteomics data as input for machine learning models that predicted ex vivo response in two independent datasets of primary AML cells (with 36 and 50 cases, respectively) to PF-3758309 and identify markers of response.

RESULTS

We found that PAK1 activation- measured from phosphoproteomics data- was predictive of poor prognosis in primary AML cases. PF-3758309 was the most effective PAKi in reducing proliferation and inducing apoptosis in AML cell lines. In cell lines and primary cells, PF-3758309 inhibited PAK, AMPK and PKCA activities, reduced c-MYC transcriptional activity and the expression of ribosomal proteins, and targeted the FLT3 pathway in FLT3-ITD mutated cells. In primary cells, PF-3758309 reduced STAT5 phosphorylation at Tyr699. Functionally, PF-3758309 reduced cell-growth, induced apoptosis, blocked cell cycle progression and promoted differentiation in a model-dependent manner. ML modelling accurately classified primary AML samples as sensitive or resistant to PF-3758309 ex vivo treatment, and highlighted PHF2 phosphorylation at Ser705 as a robust response biomarker.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our data define the proteomic, molecular and functional responses of primary and immortalised AML cells to PF-3758309 and suggest a route to personalise AML treatments based on PAK inhibitors.

PhosNetVis: A web-based tool for fast kinase-substrate enrichment analysis and interactive 2D/3D network visualizations of phosphoproteomics data

Protein phosphorylation involves the reversible modification of a protein (substrate) residue by another protein (kinase). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry studies are rapidly generating massive protein phosphorylation datasets across multiple conditions. Researchers then must infer kinases responsible for changes in phosphosites of each substrate. However, tools that infer kinase-substrate interactions (KSIs) are not optimized to interactively explore the resulting large and complex networks, significant phosphosites, and states. There is thus an unmet need for a tool that facilitates user-friendly analysis, interactive exploration, visualization, and communication of phosphoproteomics datasets. We present PhosNetVis, a web-based tool for researchers of all computational skill levels to easily infer, generate, and interactively explore KSI networks in 2D or 3D by streamlining phosphoproteomics data analysis steps within a single tool. PhostNetVis lowers barriers for researchers by rapidly generating high-quality visualizations to gain biological insights from their phosphoproteomics datasets. It is available at https://gumuslab.github.io/PhosNetVis/.

Inferring kinase activity from phosphoproteomic data: Tool comparison and recent applications

Aberrant cellular signaling pathways are a hallmark of cancer and other diseases. One of the most important signaling mechanisms involves protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation. Protein phosphorylation is catalyzed by protein kinases, and over 530 protein kinases have been identified in the human genome. Aberrant kinase activity is one of the drivers of tumorigenesis and cancer progression and results in altered phosphorylation abundance of downstream substrates. Upstream kinase activity can be inferred from the global collection of phosphorylated substrates. Mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomic experiments nowadays routinely allow identification and quantitation of >10k phosphosites per biological sample. This substrate phosphorylation footprint can be used to infer upstream kinase activities using tools like Kinase Substrate Enrichment Analysis (KSEA), Posttranslational Modification Substrate Enrichment Analysis (PTM-SEA), and Integrative Inferred Kinase Activity Analysis (INKA). Since the topic of kinase activity inference is very active with many new approaches reported in the past 3 years, we would like to give an overview of the field. In this review, an inventory of kinase activity inference tools, their underlying algorithms, statistical frameworks, kinase-substrate databases, and user-friendliness is presented. The most widely-used tools are compared in-depth. Subsequently, recent applications of the tools are described focusing on clinical tissues and hematological samples. Two main application areas for kinase activity inference tools can be discerned. (1) Maximal biological insights can be obtained from large data sets with group comparisons using multiple complementary tools (e.g., PTM-SEA and KSEA or INKA). (2) In the oncology context where personalized treatment requires analysis of single samples, INKA for example, has emerged as tool that can prioritize actionable kinases for targeted inhibition.

Proteomic Characterization of Acute Myeloid Leukemia for Precision Medicine

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly heterogeneous cancer of the hematopoietic system with no cure for most patients. In addition to chemotherapy, treatment options for AML include recently approved therapies that target proteins with roles in AML pathobiology, such as FLT3, BLC2, and IDH1/2. However, due to disease complexity, these therapies produce very diverse responses, and survival rates are still low. Thus, despite considerable advances, there remains a need for therapies that target different aspects of leukemic biology and for associated biomarkers that define patient populations likely to respond to each available therapy. To meet this need, drugs that target different AML vulnerabilities are currently in advanced stages of clinical development. Here, we review proteomics and phosphoproteomics studies that aimed to provide insights into AML biology and clinical disease heterogeneity not attainable with genomic approaches. To place the discussion in context, we first provide an overview of genetic and clinical aspects of the disease, followed by a summary of proteins targeted by compounds that have been approved or are under clinical trials for AML treatment and, if available, the biomarkers that predict responses. We then discuss proteomics and phosphoproteomics studies that provided insights into AML pathogenesis, from which potential biomarkers and drug targets were identified, and studies that aimed to rationalize the use of synergistic drug combinations. When considered as a whole, the evidence summarized here suggests that proteomics and phosphoproteomics approaches can play a crucial role in the development and implementation of precision medicine for AML patients.

Principles of phosphoproteomics and applications in cancer research

Phosphorylation constitutes the most common and best-studied regulatory post-translational modification in biological systems and archetypal signalling pathways driven by protein and lipid kinases are disrupted in essentially all cancer types. Thus, the study of the phosphoproteome stands to provide unique biological information on signalling pathway activity and on kinase network circuitry that is not captured by genetic or transcriptomic technologies. Here, we discuss the methods and tools used in phosphoproteomics and highlight how this technique has been used, and can be used in the future, for cancer research. Challenges still exist in mass spectrometry phosphoproteomics and in the software required to provide biological information from these datasets. Nevertheless, improvements in mass spectrometers with enhanced scan rates, separation capabilities and sensitivity, in biochemical methods for sample preparation and in computational pipelines are enabling an increasingly deep analysis of the phosphoproteome, where previous bottlenecks in data acquisition, processing and interpretation are being relieved. These powerful hardware and algorithmic innovations are not only providing exciting new mechanistic insights into tumour biology, from where new drug targets may be derived, but are also leading to the discovery of phosphoproteins as mediators of drug sensitivity and resistance and as classifiers of disease subtypes. These studies are, therefore, uncovering phosphoproteins as a new generation of disruptive biomarkers to improve personalised anti-cancer therapies.