Fast Functional Germline and Epigenetic Assays in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

Histone Methylation-Mediated Reproductive Toxicity to Consumer Product Chemicals in Caenorhabditis elegans: An Epigenetic Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP)

The significance of histone methylation in epigenetic inheritance underscores its relevance to disease and the chronic effects of environmental chemicals. However, limited evidence of the causal relationships between chemically induced epigenetic changes and organismal-level effects hinders the application of epigenetic markers in ecotoxicological assessments. This study explored the contribution of repressive histone marks to reproductive toxicity induced by chemicals in consumer products in Caenorhabditis elegans, applying the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework. Triclosan (TCS) and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) exposures caused reproductive toxicity and altered histone methyltransferase (HMT) and histone demethylase (HDM) activities, increasing the level of trimethylation of H3K9 and H3K27. Notably, treatment with an H3K27-specific HMT inhibitor alleviated reproductive defects and the transcriptional response of genes related to vitellogenin, xenobiotic metabolism, and oxidative stress. Comparison of points of departure (PODs) based on calculated benchmark concentrations (BMCs) revealed the sensitivity of histone-modifying enzyme activities to these chemicals. Our findings suggest that the 'disturbance of HMT and HDM' can serve as the molecular initiating event (MIE) leading to reproductive toxicity in the epigenetic AOP for TCS and TBBPA. The study extended the biological applicability of these enzymes by identifying model species with analogous protein sequences and functions. This combined approach enhances the essentiality, empirical support, and taxonomic domain of applicability (tDOA), which are crucial considerations for ecotoxicological AOPs. Given the widespread use and environmental distribution of chemicals in consumer products, this study proposes histone-modifying enzyme activity as an effective screening tool for reproductive toxicants and emphasizes the integration of epigenetic mechanisms into a prospective ERA.

FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children

FutureTox IV, a Society of Toxicology Contemporary Concepts in Toxicology workshop, was held in November 2018. Building upon FutureTox I, II, and III, this conference focused on the latest science and technology for in vitro profiling and in silico modeling as it relates to predictive developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART). Publicly available high-throughput screening data sets are now available for broad in vitro profiling of bioactivities across large inventories of chemicals. Coupling this vast amount of mechanistic data with a deeper understanding of molecular embryology and post-natal development lays the groundwork for using new approach methodologies (NAMs) to evaluate chemical toxicity, drug efficacy, and safety assessment for embryo-fetal development. NAM is a term recently adopted in reference to any technology, methodology, approach, or combination thereof that can be used to provide information on chemical hazard and risk assessment to avoid the use of intact animals (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], Strategic plan to promote the development and implementation of alternative test methods within the tsca program, 2018, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-06/documents/epa_alt_strat_plan_6-20-18_clean_final.pdf). There are challenges to implementing NAMs to evaluate chemicals for developmental toxicity compared with adult toxicity. This forum article reviews the 2018 workshop activities, highlighting challenges and opportunities for applying NAMs for adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, preterm labor, malformations, low birth weight) as well as disorders manifesting postnatally (eg, neurodevelopmental impairment, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, fertility). DART is an important concern for different regulatory statutes and test guidelines. Leveraging advancements in such approaches and the accompanying efficiencies to detecting potential hazards to human development are the unifying concepts toward implementing NAMs in DART testing. Although use of NAMs for higher level regulatory decision making is still on the horizon, the conference highlighted novel testing platforms and computational models that cover multiple levels of biological organization, with the unique temporal dynamics of embryonic development, and novel approaches for estimating toxicokinetic parameters essential in supporting in vitro to in vivo extrapolation.

The Memory of Environmental Chemical Exposure in C. elegans Is Dependent on the Jumonji Demethylases jmjd-2 and jmjd-3/utx-1

How artificial environmental cues are biologically integrated and transgenerationally inherited is still poorly understood. Here, we investigate the mechanisms of inheritance of reproductive outcomes elicited by the model environmental chemical Bisphenol A in C. elegans. We show that Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure causes the derepression of an epigenomically silenced transgene in the germline for 5 generations, regardless of ancestral response. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), histone modification quantitation, and immunofluorescence assays revealed that this effect is associated with a reduction of the repressive marks H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 in whole worms and in germline nuclei in the F3, as well as with reproductive dysfunctions, including germline apoptosis and embryonic lethality. Furthermore, targeting of the Jumonji demethylases JMJD-2 and JMJD-3/UTX-1 restores H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 levels, respectively, and it fully alleviates the BPA-induced transgenerational effects. Together, our results demonstrate the central role of repressive histone modifications in the inheritance of reproductive defects elicited by a common environmental chemical exposure.

Endocrine disruptors and the future of toxicology testing - lessons from CLARITY-BPA

Five years ago, an ambitious collaboration, the Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on Toxicity of BPA (CLARITY-BPA; henceforth CLARITY), was launched by three US agencies. The goal was to provide a definitive evaluation of bisphenol A (BPA) and explain disparities between traditional regulatory studies and findings from independent investigators. BPA or vehicle-treated rats from an FDA facility were used in a guideline study and animals and/or tissues were provided to academic researchers for analysis. An interim summary released in February 2018 by the FDA concluded that currently authorized uses of BPA continue to be safe. We disagree. In this Perspectives, we summarize the goals, design and problems of CLARITY. We conclude that, despite its flaws, CLARITY provides important insight and, taken together, the data provide compelling evidence that low-dose BPA exposure induces marked adverse effects. Indeed, the greatest number of effects were observed at doses 20,000 times lower than the current 'safe' dose of BPA for humans.

Epigenetic Applications in Adverse Outcome Pathways and Environmental Risk Evaluation

BACKGROUND

The epigenome may be an important interface between environmental chemical exposures and human health. However, the links between epigenetic modifications and health outcomes are often correlative and do not distinguish between cause and effect or common-cause relationships. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework has the potential to demonstrate, by way of an inference- and science-based analysis, the causal relationship between chemical exposures, epigenome, and adverse health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work is to discuss the epigenome as a modifier of exposure effects and risk, perspectives for integrating toxicoepigenetic data into an AOP framework, tools for the exploration of epigenetic toxicity, and integration of AOP-guided epigenetic information into science and risk-assessment processes.

DISCUSSION

Organizing epigenetic information into the topology of a qualitative AOP network may help describe how a system will respond to epigenetic modifications caused by environmental chemical exposures. However, understanding the biological plausibility, linking epigenetic effects to short- and long-term health outcomes, and including epigenetic studies in the risk assessment process is met by substantive challenges. These obstacles include understanding the complex range of epigenetic modifications and their combinatorial effects, the large number of environmental chemicals to be tested, and the lack of data that quantitatively evaluate the epigenetic effects of environmental exposure.

CONCLUSION

We anticipate that epigenetic information organized into AOP frameworks can be consistently used to support biological plausibility and to identify data gaps that will accelerate the pace at which epigenetic information is applied in chemical evaluation and risk-assessment paradigms. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2322.