Determination of ADC Concentration by Ligand-Binding Assays

Detailed Structural Elucidation of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Biotransformation Species Using High Resolution Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry with Orthogonal Dissociation Methods

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a promising drug modality substantially expanding in both the discovery space and clinical development. Assessing the biotransformation of ADCs in vitro and in vivo is important in understanding their stability and pharmacokinetic properties. We previously reported biotransformation pathways for the anti-B7H4 topoisomerase I inhibitor ADC, AZD8205, puxitatug samrotecan, that underpin its structural stability in vivo using an intact protein liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) approach. Herein, we employed a LC-high resolution multiple reaction monitoring (LC-MRMHR) approach using both collision-induced dissociation (CID) and electron-activated dissociation (EAD) methods, confirming our earlier findings. Furthermore, we were able to obtain additional detailed structural information on the biotransformation products expanding on earlier intact analyses. We also highlight the high sensitivity of LC-MRMHR for successfully identifying minor biotransformation products at low concentrations that were not detectable using the intact protein LC-HRMS workflow. Especially, EAD aided in the confirmation of biotransformation species that contain newly formed disulfide bonds due to the preferential dissociation of disulfide bonds using this method. We observed biotransformation reactions that vary between linker-payload (PL) conjugation sites on the antibody. For example, the trend toward constitutional isomerism in thio-succinimide linker hydrolysis, and the resulting positional isomers from thiol adduct formation following linker-PL deconjugation. The reported orthogonal analytical approaches highly complement and fortify the intact protein LC-HRMS data. This study sheds further light on detailed structural characterization of various ADC species and validates the proposed biotransformation pathways explaining the stability of AZD8205 in vivo.

The application of capability indices in the validation of ELISA methodology

Aim: To investigate the impact of sample replication number (duplicate vs triplicate) on the validation of ELISA methodology. Materials & methods: The methodology was validated with reference sample and test sample as an 11-point triplicate dilution series. The data were reanalyzed post-validation as if conducted as a duplicate dilution series. Results: The triplicate methodology was validated with a precision of 5.3% and mean bias of -1.7%. The duplicate methodology generated a precision of 5.7% and mean bias of -2.2%. Conclusion: Both the triplicate (method capability index = 1.37) and duplicate (method capability index = 1.25) ELISA methodology can support an 80-125% relative potency specification with a 0.004% or 0.018% probability of out-of-specification results, respectively.

Bioanalytical Assays for Pharmacokinetic and Biodistribution Study of Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are produced by the chemical linkage of cytotoxic agents and monoclonal antibodies. The complexity and heterogeneity of ADCs and the low concentration of cytotoxic agent released in vivo poses big challenges to their bioanalysis. Understanding the pharmacokinetic behavior, exposure-safety, and exposure-efficacy relationships of ADCs is needed for their successful development. Accurate analytical methods are required to evaluate intact ADCs, total antibody, released small molecule cytotoxins, and related metabolites. The selection of appropriate bioanalysis methods for comprehensive analysis of ADCs is mainly dependent on the properties of cytotoxic agents, the chemical linker, and the attachment sites. The quality of the information about the whole pharmacokinetic profile of ADCs has been improved due to the development and improvement of analytical strategies for detection of ADCs, such as ligand-binding assays and mass spectrometry-related techniques. In this article, we will focus on the bioanalytical assays that have been used in the pharmacokinetic study of ADCs and discuss their advantages, current limitations, and potential challenges. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This article describes bioanalysis methods which have been used in pharmacokinetic study of ADCs and discusses the advantages, disadvantages and potential challenges of these assays. This review is useful and helpful and will provide insights and reference for bioanalysis and development of ADCs.

Targeted Fluorogenic Cyanine Carbamates Enable In Vivo Analysis of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Linker Chemistry

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly emerging therapeutic platform. The chemical linker between the antibody and the drug payload plays an essential role in the efficacy and tolerability of these agents. New methods that quantitatively assess the cleavage efficiency in complex tissue settings could provide valuable insights into the ADC design process. Here we report the development of a near-infrared (NIR) optical imaging approach that measures the site and extent of linker cleavage in mouse models. This approach is enabled by a superior variant of our recently devised cyanine carbamate (CyBam) platform. We identify a novel tertiary amine-containing norcyanine, the product of CyBam cleavage, that exhibits a dramatically increased cellular signal due to an improved cellular permeability and lysosomal accumulation. The resulting cyanine lysosome-targeting carbamates (CyLBams) are ∼50× brighter in cells, and we find this strategy is essential for high-contrast in vivo targeted imaging. Finally, we compare a panel of several common ADC linkers across two antibodies and tumor models. These studies indicate that cathepsin-cleavable linkers provide dramatically higher tumor activation relative to hindered or nonhindered disulfides, an observation that is only apparent with in vivo imaging. This strategy enables quantitative comparisons of cleavable linker chemistries in complex tissue settings with implications across the drug delivery landscape.

Analytical Methods for the Detection and Quantification of ADCs in Biological Matrices

Understanding pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) is a one of the critical steps enabling their successful development and optimization. Their complex structure combining large and small molecule characteristics brought out multiple bioanalytical methods to decipher the behavior and fate of both components in vivo. In this respect, these methods must provide insights into different key elements including half-life and blood stability of the construct, premature release of the drug, whole-body biodistribution, and amount of the drug accumulated within the targeted pathological tissues, all of them being directly related to efficacy and safety of the ADC. In this review, we will focus on the main strategies enabling to quantify and characterize ADCs in biological matrices and discuss their associated technical challenges and current limitations.

Intact mAb LC–MS for drug concentration from pre-clinical studies: bioanalytical method performance and in-life samples

Background: Antibody biotherapeutic measurement from pharmacokinetic studies has not been traditionally based on intact molecular mass as is the case for small molecules. However, recent advancements in protein capture and mass spectrometer technology have enabled intact mass detection and quantitation for dosed biotherapeutics. A bioanalytical method validation is part of the regulatory requirement for sample analysis to determine drug concentration from in-life study samples. Results/methodology: Here, an intact protein LC–MS assay is subjected to mock bioanalytical method validation, and unknown samples are compared between intact protein LC–MS and established bioanalytical assay formats: Ligand-binding assay and peptide LC–MS/MS. Discussion/conclusion: Results are presented from the intact and traditional bioanalytical method evaluations, where the in-life sample concentrations were comparable across method types with associated data analyses presented. Furthermore, for intact protein LC–MS, modification monitoring and evaluation of data processing parameters is demonstrated.