Dynamic Treatment Stratification Using ctDNA

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) application in investigation of cancer: Bench to bedside

Now, genomics forms the core of the precision medicine concept. Comprehensive investigations of tumor genomes have made it possible to characterize tumors at the molecular level and, specifically, to identify the fundamental processes that cause condition. A variety of kinds of tumors have seen better outcomes for patients as a result of the development of novel medicines to tackle these genetic-driving processes. Since therapy may exert selective pressure on cancers, non-invasive methods such as liquid biopsies can provide the opportunity for rich reservoirs of crucial and real-time genetic data. Liquid biopsies depend on the identification of circulating cells from tumors, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), RNA, proteins, lipids, and metabolites found in patient biofluids, as well as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which exists in those with cancer. Although it is theoretically possible to examine biological fluids other than plasma, such as pleural fluid, urine, saliva, stool, cerebrospinal fluid, and ascites, we will limit our discussion to blood and solely cfDNA here for the sake of conciseness. Yet, the pace of wider clinical acceptance has been gradual, partly due to the increased difficulty of choosing the best analysis for the given clinical issue, interpreting the findings, and delaying proof of value from clinical trials. Our goal in this review is to discuss the current clinical value of ctDNA in cancers and how clinical oncology systems might incorporate procedures for ctDNA testing.

Circulating tumor DNA in clinical trials for solid tumors: Challenges and current applications

Tumor derived biomarkers including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and/or circulating tumors cells (CTCs) may be detected and quantified through liquid biopsy (LB). ctDNA analysis through LB is a validated tool for monitoring response to systemic treatment and detecting molecular mechanisms of resistance at the time of progression of advanced stage malignancies. Several applications of ctDNA have been investigated in the diagnostic phase of cancer or in the post-curative treatment surveillance phase (e.g., minimal residual disease assessment after neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy). Recently, the improvement of ctDNA technology and its implementation have affected early phase trials design, with significant changes in the inclusion and randomization phases. Implementation of LB has resulted in large-scale development of academic programs aimed at exploiting all the potential applications of ctDNA, such as patients extended molecular screening, molecular oriented treatment decision making, monitoring of anti-cancer treatments response. In this rapid evolving field, the challenge is no longer the technique, but the evaluation of the results and the interpretation of their impact on diagnosis, prognosis, or therapeutic decision. Leading research cancer centers may favor education for scientific community, by capturing data on this evolving technology and sharing knowledge. In this review we summarize the main applications and challenges of ctDNA genotyping in clinical trials, with special focus on ongoing studies. We finally describe the most important next generation academic and industry-sponsored programs addressing early cancer detection and prevention in high-risk populations through ctDNA genotyping.

An Overview: Genetic Tumor Markers for Early Detection and Current Gene Therapy Strategies

Genomic instability is considered a fundamental factor involved in any neoplastic disease. Consequently, the genetically unstable cells contribute to intratumoral genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic diversity of cancer. These genetic alterations can be detected by several diagnostic techniques of molecular biology and the detection of alteration in genomic integrity may serve as reliable genetic molecular markers for the early detection of cancer or cancer-related abnormal changes in the body cells. These genetic molecular markers can detect cancer earlier than any other method of cancer diagnosis, once a tumor is diagnosed, then replacement or therapeutic manipulation of these cancer-related abnormal genetic changes can be possible, which leads toward effective and target-specific cancer treatment and in many cases, personalized treatment of cancer could be performed without the adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In this review, we describe how these genetic molecular markers can be detected and the possible ways for the application of this gene diagnosis for gene therapy that can attack cancerous cells, directly or indirectly, which lead to overall improved management and quality of life for a cancer patient.

Cancer evolution: Darwin and beyond

Clinical and laboratory studies over recent decades have established branched evolution as a feature of cancer. However, while grounded in somatic selection, several lines of evidence suggest a Darwinian model alone is insufficient to fully explain cancer evolution. First, the role of macroevolutionary events in tumour initiation and progression contradicts Darwin's central thesis of gradualism. Whole-genome doubling, chromosomal chromoplexy and chromothripsis represent examples of single catastrophic events which can drive tumour evolution. Second, neutral evolution can play a role in some tumours, indicating that selection is not always driving evolution. Third, increasing appreciation of the role of the ageing soma has led to recent generalised theories of age-dependent carcinogenesis. Here, we review these concepts and others, which collectively argue for a model of cancer evolution which extends beyond Darwin. We also highlight clinical opportunities which can be grasped through targeting cancer vulnerabilities arising from non-Darwinian patterns of evolution.

Properties and Application of Cell-Free DNA as a Clinical Biomarker

Biomarkers are valuable tools in clinical practice. In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) standardized the definition of a biomarker as a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. A biomarker has clinical relevance when it presents precision, standardization and reproducibility, suitability to the patient, straightforward interpretation by clinicians, and high sensitivity and/or specificity by the parameter it proposes to identify. Thus, serum biomarkers should have advantages related to the simplicity of the procedures and to the fact that venous blood collection is commonplace in clinical practice. We described the potentiality of cfDNA as a general clinical biomarker and focused on endothelial dysfunction. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to extracellular DNA present in body fluid that may be derived from both normal and diseased cells. An increasing number of studies demonstrate the potential use of cfDNA as a noninvasive biomarker to determine physiologic and pathologic conditions. However, although still scarce, increasing evidence has been reported regarding using cfDNA in cardiovascular diseases. Here, we have reviewed the history of cfDNA, its source, molecular features, and release mechanism. We also show recent studies that have investigated cfDNA as a possible marker of endothelial damage in clinical settings. In the cardiovascular system, the studies are quite new, and although interesting, stronger evidence is still needed. However, some drawbacks in cfDNA methodologies should be overcome before its recommendation as a biomarker in the clinical setting.

The Provocative Roles of Platelets in Liver Disease and Cancer

Both platelets and the liver play important roles in the processes of coagulation and innate immunity. Platelet responses at the site of an injury are rapid; their immediate activation and structural changes minimize the loss of blood. The majority of coagulation proteins are produced by the liver—a multifunctional organ that also plays a critical role in many processes: removal of toxins and metabolism of fats, proteins, carbohydrates, and drugs. Chronic inflammation, trauma, or other causes of irreversible damage to the liver can dysregulate these pathways leading to organ and systemic abnormalities. In some cases, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios can also be a predictor of disease outcome. An example is cirrhosis, which increases the risk of bleeding and prothrombotic events followed by activation of platelets. Along with a triggered coagulation cascade, the platelets increase the risk of pro-thrombotic events and contribute to cancer progression and metastasis. This progression and the resulting tissue destruction is physiologically comparable to a persistent, chronic wound. Various cancers, including colorectal cancer, have been associated with increased thrombocytosis, platelet activation, platelet-storage granule release, and thrombosis; anti-platelet agents can reduce cancer risk and progression. However, in cancer patients with pre-existing liver disease who are undergoing chemotherapy, the risk of thrombotic events becomes challenging to manage due to their inherent risk for bleeding. Chemotherapy, also known to induce damage to the liver, further increases the frequency of thrombotic events. Depending on individual patient risks, these factors acting together can disrupt the fragile balance between pro- and anti-coagulant processes, heightening liver thrombogenesis, and possibly providing a niche for circulating tumor cells to adhere to—thus promoting both liver metastasis and cancer-cell survival following treatment (that is, with minimal residual disease in the liver).

Future Directions in the Use of SAbR for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers

The role of local therapy as a sole therapy or part of a combined approach in treating metastatic cancer continues to evolve. The most obvious requirements for prudent implementation of local therapies like stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) to become mainstream in treating oligometastases are (1) Clear guidance as to what particular patients might benefit, and (2) Confirmation of improvements in outcome after such treatments via clinical trials. These future directional requirements are non-negotiable. However, innovation and research offer many more opportunities to understand and improve therapy. Identifying candidates and personalizing their therapy can be afforded via proteomic, genomic and epigenomic characterization techniques. Such molecular profiling along with liquid biopsy opportunities will both help select best therapies and facilitate ongoing monitoring of response. Technologies both to find targets and help deliver less-toxic therapy continue to improve and will be available in the marketplace. These technologies include molecular-based imaging (eg, PET-PSMA), FLASH ultra-high dose rate platforms, Grid therapy, PULSAR adaptive dosing, and MRI/PET guided linear accelerators. Importantly, a treatment approach beyond oligometastastic could evolve including a rationale for using SAbR in the oligoprogressive, oligononresponsive, oligobulky and oligolethal settings as well as expansion beyond oligo- toward even plurimetastastic disease. In any case, lessons learned and experiences required by the implementation of using SAbR in oligometastatic cancer will be revisited.

Ready-to-use nanopore platform for the detection of any DNA/RNA oligo at attomole range using an Osmium tagged complementary probe

Nanopores can serve as single molecule sensors. We exploited the MinION, a portable nanopore device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies, and repurposed it to detect any DNA/RNA oligo (target) in a complex mixture by conducting voltage-driven ion-channel measurements. The detection and quantitation of the target is enabled by the use of a unique complementary probe. Using a validated labeling technology, probes are tagged with a bulky Osmium tag (Osmium tetroxide 2,2′-bipyridine), in a way that preserves strong hybridization between probe and target. Intact oligos traverse the MinION’s nanopore relatively quickly compared to the device’s acquisition rate, and exhibit count of events comparable to the baseline. Counts are reported by a publicly available software, OsBp_detect. Due to the presence of the bulky Osmium tag, probes traverse more slowly, produce multiple counts over the baseline, and are even detected at single digit attomole (amole) range. In the presence of the target the probe is “silenced”. Silencing is attributed to a 1:1 double stranded (ds) complex that does not fit and cannot traverse this nanopore. This ready-to-use platform can be tailored as a diagnostic test to meet the requirements for point-of-care cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) and microRNA (miRNA) detection and quantitation in body fluids.