1
|
Erdur AC, Rusche D, Scholz D, Kiechle J, Fischer S, Llorián-Salvador Ó, Buchner JA, Nguyen MQ, Etzel L, Weidner J, Metz MC, Wiestler B, Schnabel J, Rueckert D, Combs SE, Peeken JC. Deep learning for autosegmentation for radiotherapy treatment planning: State-of-the-art and novel perspectives. Strahlenther Onkol 2025; 201:236-254. [PMID: 39105745 PMCID: PMC11839850 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02262-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has gained importance, with many tools already entering our daily lives. The medical field of radiation oncology is also subject to this development, with AI entering all steps of the patient journey. In this review article, we summarize contemporary AI techniques and explore the clinical applications of AI-based automated segmentation models in radiotherapy planning, focusing on delineation of organs at risk (OARs), the gross tumor volume (GTV), and the clinical target volume (CTV). Emphasizing the need for precise and individualized plans, we review various commercial and freeware segmentation tools and also state-of-the-art approaches. Through our own findings and based on the literature, we demonstrate improved efficiency and consistency as well as time savings in different clinical scenarios. Despite challenges in clinical implementation such as domain shifts, the potential benefits for personalized treatment planning are substantial. The integration of mathematical tumor growth models and AI-based tumor detection further enhances the possibilities for refining target volumes. As advancements continue, the prospect of one-stop-shop segmentation and radiotherapy planning represents an exciting frontier in radiotherapy, potentially enabling fast treatment with enhanced precision and individualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayhan Can Erdur
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
| | - Daniel Rusche
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Daniel Scholz
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Johannes Kiechle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute for Computational Imaging and AI in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberg Str. 2a, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Konrad Zuse School of Excellence in Reliable AI (relAI), Technical University of Munich, Walther-von-Dyck-Straße 10, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Stefan Fischer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute for Computational Imaging and AI in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberg Str. 2a, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Óscar Llorián-Salvador
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Department for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology - i12, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 3, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU), Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | - Josef A Buchner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Mai Q Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Lucas Etzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Jonas Weidner
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Marie-Christin Metz
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Julia Schnabel
- Institute for Computational Imaging and AI in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenberg Str. 2a, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Konrad Zuse School of Excellence in Reliable AI (relAI), Technical University of Munich, Walther-von-Dyck-Straße 10, 85748, Garching, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Machine Learning in Biomedical Imaging, Helmholtz Munich, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Bavaria, Germany
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Strand, WC2R 2LS, London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Informatics in Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, SW7 2BX, London, London, UK
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str., 81675, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lavanya J M S, P S. Innovative approach towards early prediction of ovarian cancer: Machine learning- enabled XAI techniques. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29197. [PMID: 39669371 PMCID: PMC11636890 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Globally, ovarian cancer affects women disproportionately, causing significant morbidity and mortality rates. The early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is necessary for enhancing patient health and survival rates. This research article explores the utilization of Machine Learning (ML) techniques alongside eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methodologies to aid in the early detection of ovarian cancer. ML techniques have recently gained popularity in developing predictive models to detect early-stage ovarian cancer. These predictions are made using XAI in a transparent and understandable way for healthcare professionals and patients. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of various ovarian cancer prediction methodologies. This includes assessing K Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Decision trees, and ensemble learning techniques such as Max Voting, Boosting, Bagging, and Stacking. A dataset of 349 patients with known ovarian cancer status was collected from Kaggle. The dataset included a comprehensive range of clinical features such as age, family history, tumor markers, and imaging characteristics. Preprocessing techniques were applied to enhance input data, including feature scaling and dimensionality reduction. A Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR) algorithm was used to select the features in the model. Our experimental results demonstrate that in Support Vector Machines, we found 85 % base model accuracy and 89 % accuracy after stacking several ensemble learning techniques. With the help of XAI, complex ML algorithms can be given more profound insights into their decision-making, improving their applicability. This paper aims to introduce the best practices for integrating ML and artificial intelligence in biomarker evaluation. Building and evaluating Shapley values-based classifiers and visualizing results were the focus of our investigation. The study contributes to the field of oncology and women's health by offering a promising approach to the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheela Lavanya J M
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India
| | - Subbulakshmi P
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dörrich M, Hecht M, Fietkau R, Hartmann A, Iro H, Gostian AO, Eckstein M, Kist AM. Explainable convolutional neural networks for assessing head and neck cancer histopathology. Diagn Pathol 2023; 18:121. [PMID: 37924082 PMCID: PMC10623808 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-023-01407-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although neural networks have shown remarkable performance in medical image analysis, their translation into clinical practice remains difficult due to their lack of interpretability. An emerging field that addresses this problem is Explainable AI. METHODS Here, we aimed to investigate the ability of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to classify head and neck cancer histopathology. To this end, we manually annotated 101 histopathological slides of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We trained a CNN to classify tumor and non-tumor tissue, and another CNN to semantically segment four classes - tumor, non-tumor, non-specified tissue, and background. We applied Explainable AI techniques, namely Grad-CAM and HR-CAM, to both networks and explored important features that contributed to their decisions. RESULTS The classification network achieved an accuracy of 89.9% on previously unseen data. Our segmentation network achieved a class-averaged Intersection over Union score of 0.690, and 0.782 for tumor tissue in particular. Explainable AI methods demonstrated that both networks rely on features agreeing with the pathologist's expert opinion. CONCLUSION Our work suggests that CNNs can predict head and neck cancer with high accuracy. Especially if accompanied by visual explanations, CNNs seem promising for assisting pathologists in the assessment of cancer sections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Dörrich
- Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91052, Germany
| | - Markus Hecht
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, 66421, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Bavaria, Germany
| | - Heinrich Iro
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Antoniu-Oreste Gostian
- Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Bavaria, Germany
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91054, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Bavaria, Germany
| | - Andreas M Kist
- Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, 91052, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holub P, Müller H, Bíl T, Pireddu L, Plass M, Prasser F, Schlünder I, Zatloukal K, Nenutil R, Brázdil T. Privacy risks of whole-slide image sharing in digital pathology. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2577. [PMID: 37142591 PMCID: PMC10160114 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37991-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Access to large volumes of so-called whole-slide images-high-resolution scans of complete pathological slides-has become a cornerstone of the development of novel artificial intelligence methods in pathology for diagnostic use, education/training of pathologists, and research. Nevertheless, a methodology based on risk analysis for evaluating the privacy risks associated with sharing such imaging data and applying the principle "as open as possible and as closed as necessary" is still lacking. In this article, we develop a model for privacy risk analysis for whole-slide images which focuses primarily on identity disclosure attacks, as these are the most important from a regulatory perspective. We introduce a taxonomy of whole-slide images with respect to privacy risks and mathematical model for risk assessment and design . Based on this risk assessment model and the taxonomy, we conduct a series of experiments to demonstrate the risks using real-world imaging data. Finally, we develop guidelines for risk assessment and recommendations for low-risk sharing of whole-slide image data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Holub
- BBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria.
- Institute of Computer Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Heimo Müller
- BBMRI.at & Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, A-8010, Austria
| | - Tomáš Bíl
- Institute of Computer Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Pireddu
- Visual and Data-intensive Computing Group, CRS4, Pula, Italy
| | - Markus Plass
- BBMRI.at & Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, A-8010, Austria
| | - Fabian Prasser
- Berlin Institute of Health @ Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Kurt Zatloukal
- BBMRI.at & Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, A-8010, Austria
| | - Rudolf Nenutil
- BBMRI.cz & Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Brázdil
- Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Plass M, Kargl M, Kiehl TR, Regitnig P, Geißler C, Evans T, Zerbe N, Carvalho R, Holzinger A, Müller H. Explainability and causability in digital pathology. J Pathol Clin Res 2023. [PMID: 37045794 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
The current move towards digital pathology enables pathologists to use artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer programmes for the advanced analysis of whole slide images. However, currently, the best-performing AI algorithms for image analysis are deemed black boxes since it remains - even to their developers - often unclear why the algorithm delivered a particular result. Especially in medicine, a better understanding of algorithmic decisions is essential to avoid mistakes and adverse effects on patients. This review article aims to provide medical experts with insights on the issue of explainability in digital pathology. A short introduction to the relevant underlying core concepts of machine learning shall nurture the reader's understanding of why explainability is a specific issue in this field. Addressing this issue of explainability, the rapidly evolving research field of explainable AI (XAI) has developed many techniques and methods to make black-box machine-learning systems more transparent. These XAI methods are a first step towards making black-box AI systems understandable by humans. However, we argue that an explanation interface must complement these explainable models to make their results useful to human stakeholders and achieve a high level of causability, i.e. a high level of causal understanding by the user. This is especially relevant in the medical field since explainability and causability play a crucial role also for compliance with regulatory requirements. We conclude by promoting the need for novel user interfaces for AI applications in pathology, which enable contextual understanding and allow the medical expert to ask interactive 'what-if'-questions. In pathology, such user interfaces will not only be important to achieve a high level of causability. They will also be crucial for keeping the human-in-the-loop and bringing medical experts' experience and conceptual knowledge to AI processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Plass
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Michaela Kargl
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Tim-Rasmus Kiehl
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Regitnig
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christian Geißler
- DAI-Labor, Agent Oriented Technologies (AOT), Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Theodore Evans
- DAI-Labor, Agent Oriented Technologies (AOT), Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Norman Zerbe
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rita Carvalho
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Holzinger
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Human-Centered AI Lab, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heimo Müller
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lundström C, Lindvall M. Mapping the Landscape of Care Providers' Quality Assurance Approaches for AI in Diagnostic Imaging. J Digit Imaging 2023; 36:379-387. [PMID: 36352164 PMCID: PMC10039170 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00731-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The discussion on artificial intelligence (AI) solutions in diagnostic imaging has matured in recent years. The potential value of AI adoption is well established, as are the potential risks associated. Much focus has, rightfully, been on regulatory certification of AI products, with the strong incentive of being an enabling step for the commercial actors. It is, however, becoming evident that regulatory approval is not enough to ensure safe and effective AI usage in the local setting. In other words, care providers need to develop and implement quality assurance (QA) approaches for AI solutions in diagnostic imaging. The domain of AI-specific QA is still in an early development phase. We contribute to this development by describing the current landscape of QA-for-AI approaches in medical imaging, with focus on radiology and pathology. We map the potential quality threats and review the existing QA approaches in relation to those threats. We propose a practical categorization of QA approaches, based on key characteristics corresponding to means, situation, and purpose. The review highlights the heterogeneity of methods and practices relevant for this domain and points to targets for future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claes Lundström
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
- Sectra AB, Linköping, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
A comprehensive taxonomy for explainable artificial intelligence: a systematic survey of surveys on methods and concepts. Data Min Knowl Discov 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s10618-022-00867-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
AbstractIn the meantime, a wide variety of terminologies, motivations, approaches, and evaluation criteria have been developed within the research field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). With the amount of XAI methods vastly growing, a taxonomy of methods is needed by researchers as well as practitioners: To grasp the breadth of the topic, compare methods, and to select the right XAI method based on traits required by a specific use-case context. Many taxonomies for XAI methods of varying level of detail and depth can be found in the literature. While they often have a different focus, they also exhibit many points of overlap. This paper unifies these efforts and provides a complete taxonomy of XAI methods with respect to notions present in the current state of research. In a structured literature analysis and meta-study, we identified and reviewed more than 50 of the most cited and current surveys on XAI methods, metrics, and method traits. After summarizing them in a survey of surveys, we merge terminologies and concepts of the articles into a unified structured taxonomy. Single concepts therein are illustrated by more than 50 diverse selected example methods in total, which we categorize accordingly. The taxonomy may serve both beginners, researchers, and practitioners as a reference and wide-ranging overview of XAI method traits and aspects. Hence, it provides foundations for targeted, use-case-oriented, and context-sensitive future research.
Collapse
|
8
|
New definitions of human lymphoid and follicular cell entities in lymphatic tissue by machine learning. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18991. [PMID: 36347879 PMCID: PMC9643435 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18097-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Histological sections of the lymphatic system are usually the basis of static (2D) morphological investigations. Here, we performed a dynamic (4D) analysis of human reactive lymphoid tissue using confocal fluorescent laser microscopy in combination with machine learning. Based on tracks for T-cells (CD3), B-cells (CD20), follicular T-helper cells (PD1) and optical flow of follicular dendritic cells (CD35), we put forward the first quantitative analysis of movement-related and morphological parameters within human lymphoid tissue. We identified correlations of follicular dendritic cell movement and the behavior of lymphocytes in the microenvironment. In addition, we investigated the value of movement and/or morphological parameters for a precise definition of cell types (CD clusters). CD-clusters could be determined based on movement and/or morphology. Differentiating between CD3- and CD20 positive cells is most challenging and long term-movement characteristics are indispensable. We propose morphological and movement-related prototypes of cell entities applying machine learning models. Finally, we define beyond CD clusters new subgroups within lymphocyte entities based on long term movement characteristics. In conclusion, we showed that the combination of 4D imaging and machine learning is able to define characteristics of lymphocytes not visible in 2D histology.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fasterholdt I, Naghavi-Behzad M, Rasmussen BSB, Kjølhede T, Skjøth MM, Hildebrandt MG, Kidholm K. Value assessment of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a scoping review. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:187. [PMID: 36316665 PMCID: PMC9620604 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00918-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as one of the major disrupting forces in the future healthcare system. However, the assessment of the value of these new technologies is still unclear, and no agreed international health technology assessment-based guideline exists. This study provides an overview of the available literature in the value assessment of AI in the field of medical imaging. METHODS We performed a systematic scoping review of published studies between January 2016 and September 2020 using 10 databases (Medline, Scopus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and six related databases of grey literature). Information about the context (country, clinical area, and type of study) and mentioned domains with specific outcomes and items were extracted. An existing domain classification, from a European assessment framework, was used as a point of departure, and extracted data were grouped into domains and content analysis of data was performed covering predetermined themes. RESULTS Seventy-nine studies were included out of 5890 identified articles. An additional seven studies were identified by searching reference lists, and the analysis was performed on 86 included studies. Eleven domains were identified: (1) health problem and current use of technology, (2) technology aspects, (3) safety assessment, (4) clinical effectiveness, (5) economics, (6) ethical analysis, (7) organisational aspects, (8) patients and social aspects, (9) legal aspects, (10) development of AI algorithm, performance metrics and validation, and (11) other aspects. The frequency of mentioning a domain varied from 20 to 78% within the included papers. Only 15/86 studies were actual assessments of AI technologies. The majority of data were statements from reviews or papers voicing future needs or challenges of AI research, i.e. not actual outcomes of evaluations. CONCLUSIONS This review regarding value assessment of AI in medical imaging yielded 86 studies including 11 identified domains. The domain classification based on European assessment framework proved useful and current analysis added one new domain. Included studies had a broad range of essential domains about addressing AI technologies highlighting the importance of domains related to legal and ethical aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iben Fasterholdt
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Benjamin S. B. Rasmussen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- CAI-X – Centre for Clinical Artificial Intelligence, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tue Kjølhede
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mette Maria Skjøth
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kristian Kidholm
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pocevičiūtė M, Eilertsen G, Jarkman S, Lundström C. Generalisation effects of predictive uncertainty estimation in deep learning for digital pathology. Sci Rep 2022; 12:8329. [PMID: 35585087 PMCID: PMC9117245 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11826-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) has shown great potential in digital pathology applications. The robustness of a diagnostic DL-based solution is essential for safe clinical deployment. In this work we evaluate if adding uncertainty estimates for DL predictions in digital pathology could result in increased value for the clinical applications, by boosting the general predictive performance or by detecting mispredictions. We compare the effectiveness of model-integrated methods (MC dropout and Deep ensembles) with a model-agnostic approach (Test time augmentation, TTA). Moreover, four uncertainty metrics are compared. Our experiments focus on two domain shift scenarios: a shift to a different medical center and to an underrepresented subtype of cancer. Our results show that uncertainty estimates increase reliability by reducing a model’s sensitivity to classification threshold selection as well as by detecting between 70 and 90% of the mispredictions done by the model. Overall, the deep ensembles method achieved the best performance closely followed by TTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milda Pocevičiūtė
- Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. .,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Gabriel Eilertsen
- Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Sofia Jarkman
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Pathology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Claes Lundström
- Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Sectra AB, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Olczak J, Pavlopoulos J, Prijs J, Ijpma FFA, Doornberg JN, Lundström C, Hedlund J, Gordon M. Presenting artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning studies to clinicians and healthcare stakeholders: an introductory reference with a guideline and a Clinical AI Research (CAIR) checklist proposal. Acta Orthop 2021; 92:513-525. [PMID: 33988081 PMCID: PMC8519529 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1918389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - Artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL), and machine learning (ML) have become common research fields in orthopedics and medicine in general. Engineers perform much of the work. While they gear the results towards healthcare professionals, the difference in competencies and goals creates challenges for collaboration and knowledge exchange. We aim to provide clinicians with a context and understanding of AI research by facilitating communication between creators, researchers, clinicians, and readers of medical AI and ML research.Methods and results - We present the common tasks, considerations, and pitfalls (both methodological and ethical) that clinicians will encounter in AI research. We discuss the following topics: labeling, missing data, training, testing, and overfitting. Common performance and outcome measures for various AI and ML tasks are presented, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, Dice score, the area under the curve, and ROC curves. We also discuss ethical considerations in terms of privacy, fairness, autonomy, safety, responsibility, and liability regarding data collecting or sharing.Interpretation - We have developed guidelines for reporting medical AI research to clinicians in the run-up to a broader consensus process. The proposed guidelines consist of a Clinical Artificial Intelligence Research (CAIR) checklist and specific performance metrics guidelines to present and evaluate research using AI components. Researchers, engineers, clinicians, and other stakeholders can use these proposal guidelines and the CAIR checklist to read, present, and evaluate AI research geared towards a healthcare setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Olczak
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
| | - John Pavlopoulos
- Department of Computer and System Sciences, Stockholm University, Sweden
| | - Jasper Prijs
- Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank F A Ijpma
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- The Machine Learning Consortium
| | - Job N Doornberg
- Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- The Machine Learning Consortium
| | - Claes Lundström
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Joel Hedlund
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Max Gordon
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oliveira SP, Neto PC, Fraga J, Montezuma D, Monteiro A, Monteiro J, Ribeiro L, Gonçalves S, Pinto IM, Cardoso JS. CAD systems for colorectal cancer from WSI are still not ready for clinical acceptance. Sci Rep 2021; 11:14358. [PMID: 34257363 PMCID: PMC8277780 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93746-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Most oncological cases can be detected by imaging techniques, but diagnosis is based on pathological assessment of tissue samples. In recent years, the pathology field has evolved to a digital era where tissue samples are digitised and evaluated on screen. As a result, digital pathology opened up many research opportunities, allowing the development of more advanced image processing techniques, as well as artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies. Nevertheless, despite colorectal cancer (CRC) being the second deadliest cancer type worldwide, with increasing incidence rates, the application of AI for CRC diagnosis, particularly on whole-slide images (WSI), is still a young field. In this review, we analyse some relevant works published on this particular task and highlight the limitations that hinder the application of these works in clinical practice. We also empirically investigate the feasibility of using weakly annotated datasets to support the development of computer-aided diagnosis systems for CRC from WSI. Our study underscores the need for large datasets in this field and the use of an appropriate learning methodology to gain the most benefit from partially annotated datasets. The CRC WSI dataset used in this study, containing 1,133 colorectal biopsy and polypectomy samples, is available upon reasonable request.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara P Oliveira
- INESCTEC, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
- Faculty of Engineering (FEUP), University of Porto, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Pedro C Neto
- INESCTEC, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Engineering (FEUP), University of Porto, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Fraga
- IMP Diagnostics, 4150-146, Porto, Portugal
| | - Diana Montezuma
- IMP Diagnostics, 4150-146, Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS, University of Porto, 4050-313, Porto , Portugal
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, IPO-Porto, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jaime S Cardoso
- INESCTEC, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Engineering (FEUP), University of Porto, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|