Treatment of tumor-induced osteolysis by APD

Bisphosphonates in Oncology: Physiopathologic Bases and Clinical Activity

Osteoclastic activation is the ultimate way of bone resorption in neoplasia, induced by the combined effects of tumor-secreted humoral factors (especially parathyroid hormone-related peptides) and osteoclastic-osteoblastic interaction. Bisphosphonates inhibit the osteoclast activity and reduce bone resorption and are a valuable supportive measure for bone disease of neoplasms. Experimental models also suggest an activity of bisphosphonates against cancer cells. Controlled studies, especially in advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma, indicate different effectiveness against the distinct skeletal-related events. Intravenous clodronate and, especially, pamidronate and zoledronate are the first-choice drugs for hypercalcemia, and they play a significant role in reducing metastatic bone pain. Their prolonged use delays, without hampering, the progression of bone disease, including the appearance of osteolysis and the occurrence of pathologic fractures. This effect is probably more valuable when bisphosphonates are administered early in the course of the disease. The evidence that adjuvant bisphosphonates improve survival needs to be confirmed in ongoing studies. Although poorly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, oral bisphosphonates are effective in preventing and treating cancer-induced osteoporosis in long-living patients with operable breast cancer. At present, there is little hope that newer bisphosphonates are more effective than those currently used.

Understanding and optimizing bone health in breast cancer

Bone is the preferred site of metastasis for breast cancer, and presence of skeletal lesions is associated with significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Skeletal-related effects such as pain, pathologic fractures, spinal compression, and hypercalcemia are frequent consequences of skeletal lesions of breast cancer that have debilitating effects on the patients' quality of life. In addition to direct cancer effects on the skeleton, therapies commonly used to treat patients with breast cancer such as chemotherapy and aromatase inhibitors (AI) result in cancer therapy-induced bone loss (CTIBL) which is associated with increased risk of skeletal complications such as fractures. Bisphosphonates are a class of antiresorptive drugs that are now firmly established as the cornerstone of the management of skeletal-related events due to breast cancer. Other novel bone-targeting agents such as the anti-receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) monoclonal antibody denosumab are also showing promising activity in the treatment of bone metastasis secondary to breast cancer. Moreover, recent provocative evidence suggests that bisphosphonates might also exhibit antitumor activity via direct and indirect mechanisms. The goal of this review is to summarize the pathophysiology of osteolytic bone lesions secondary to breast cancer, provide clinical evidence of currently available bone-targeted drugs in the treatment of bone metastasis and CTIBL, and explore the antitumor activity of current bone-targeted agents in patients with breast cancer.

Bisphosphonates in the treatment of malignant bone disease

Tumor-induced osteolysis or lytic bone disease is mediated by osteoclast activation. Osteoclasts can be activated directly by products produced by tumors or indirectly through other nonmalignant cells. By reducing osteoclastic activity, bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption. Since these agents were shown effective in treating other diseases associated with increased bone resorption, including cancer-related hypercalcemia and Paget's disease of bone, studies have been initiated to explore the use of bisphosphonates in patients with osteolytic bone metastases. Recent large randomized double-blind studies show the efficacy of these agents in reducing skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from both breast cancer and multiple myeloma.

Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE

To assess whether pamidronate can reduce the frequency of skeletal morbidity in women with lytic bone metastases from breast cancer treated with hormone therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred seventy-two women with breast cancer who had at least one lytic bone lesion and who were receiving hormonal therapy were randomized to receive 90 mg of pamidronate or placebo as a 2-hour intravenous infusion given in double-blind fashion every 4 weeks for 24 cycles. Patients were evaluated for skeletal complications: pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, irradiation of or surgery on bone, or hypercalcemia. The skeletal morbidity rate (the ratio of the number of skeletal complications to the time on trial) was the primary efficacy variable. Bone pain, use of analgesics, quality of life, performance status, bone tumor response, and biochemical parameters were also evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-two patients who received pamidronate and 189 who received placebo were assessable. The skeletal morbidity rate was significantly reduced at 12, 18, and 24 cycles in patients treated with 90 mg of pamidronate (P = .028, .023, and .008, respectively). At 24 cycles, the proportion of patients having had any skeletal complication was 56% in the pamidronate group and 67% in the placebo group (P = .027). The time to the first skeletal complication was longer for patients receiving pamidronate than for those given placebo (P = .049). There was no statistical difference in survival or in objective bone response rate. Pamidronate was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with 90 mg of pamidronate as a 2-hour intravenous infusion every 4 weeks in addition to hormonal therapy significantly reduces skeletal morbidity from osteolytic metastases.

Long-term effects of intravenous pamidronate in fibrous dysplasia of bone

Fibrous dysplasia of bone (FD) is a rare disorder characterized by proliferation of fibrous tissue in bone marrow leading to osteolytic lesions. It causes bone pain and fractures. To date the only treatment is orthopedic. Histological and biochemical similarities between FD and Paget's bone disease related to increased osteoclastic resorption led us to propose treatment with the bisphosphonate pamidronate. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term effects of intravenous pamidronate in FD. In this open label phase III study, 20 patients with FD (11 males and 9 females; mean age 31 years) received courses of 180 mg of intravenous pamidronate every 6 months (60 mg/day during 3 days by infusion). The mean duration of follow-up was 39 months (range 18-64). Severity of bone pain, number of painful skeletal sites per patient, X-rays of all involved areas, serum alkaline phosphatase, fasting urinary hydroxyproline, and urinary type I collagen C-telopeptide were assessed every 6 months. The severity of bone pain and the number of painful sites appeared to be significantly reduced. All biochemical markers of bone remodeling were substantially lowered. We observed a radiographic response in nine patients with refilling of osteolytic lesions. A mineralization defect proven by bone biopsy was observed in one case. Four patients sustained bone stress lines, but no fracture occurred. We suggest that intravenous pamidronate alleviates bone pain, reduces the rate of bone turnover assessed by biochemical markers, and improves radiological lesions of FD. Few side effects were observed.

Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates such as pamidronate disodium inhibit osteoclast-induced bone resorption associated with cancer that has metastasized to bone.

METHODS

Women with stage IV breast cancer who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy and had at least one lytic bone lesion were given either placebo or pamidronate (90 mg) as a two-hour intravenous infusion monthly for 12 cycles. Skeletal complications, including pathologic fractures, the need for radiation to bone or bone surgery, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia (a serum calcium concentration above 12 mg per deciliter [3.0 mmol per liter] or elevated to any degree and requiring treatment), were assessed monthly. Bone pain, use of analgesic drugs, performance status, and quality of life were assessed throughout the trial.

RESULTS

The efficacy of treatment was evaluated in 380 of 382 randomized patients, 185 receiving pamidronate and 195 receiving placebo. The median time to the occurrence of the first skeletal complication was greater in the pamidronate group than in the placebo group (13.1 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.005), and the proportion of patients in whom any skeletal complication occurred was lower (43 percent vs. 56 percent, P = 0.008). There was significantly less increase in bone pain (P=0.046) and deterioration of performance status (P=0.027) in the pamidronate group than in the placebo group. Pamidronate was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Monthly infusions of pamidronate as a supplement to chemotherapy can protect against skeletal complications in women with stage IV breast cancer who have osteolytic bone metastases.

Analgesic effect of bisphosphonates on bone pain in breast cancer patients: a review article

Bisphosphonates exert their analgesic effect by several mechanisms. The long-term effects are probably due to osteoclast inhibition. The acute pain-relieving effect, which occurs within days or a week, is likely to be associated with the reduction of various potentially pain-producing substances. As regards pamidronate, several open, controlled studies have shown a significant effect on bone pain in 30-70% of breast cancer patients. The effects have been dose-dependent: a mean dose of 15 mg i.v./week is obviously suboptimal, whereas higher doses yield markedly better effects. The dose response is most evident at doses between 15 and 30 mg/week. Furthermore, the total dose per infusion is of interest: 30 mg every 2 weeks is an ineffective treatment, whereas 60 mg every 4 weeks is more effective. Thus, both the dose per week and the total dose per infusion are of importance in order to achieve optimal treatment. Patients with rapid progression of their disease require higher doses than patients with slow progression. Parenteral therapy is more effective than oral treatment. Both oral and parenteral clodronate exert a significant, positive effect on total skeletal morbidity and thus probably also on bone pain. Unfortunately, pain measurements have not been performed and evidence for pain reduction is indirect. Specific pain studies and studies of quality of life, with few exceptions, are, however, still lacking.

The future of bisphosphonates in cancer

Bisphosphonates, in conjunction with rehydration, are now the treatment of choice for hypercalcaemia of malignancy. They can also relieve bone pain and improve quality of life as single agent therapy and, in conjunction with systemic anticancer treatments, can prevent skeletal complications and slow down the metastatic process. The clinical effects are greatest and most clearly defined in breast cancer and multiple myeloma, but, theoretically, clinical benefit should be achievable across the entire spectrum of metastatic bone disease. The new biochemical markers for measuring bone resorption are for the first time providing a direct assessment of the effects of treatment on bone. It is hoped that they will enable a more scientific selection of the type, dose and schedule of bisphosphonate required for the best compromise between efficacy, convenience and patient acceptability. We can expect to see a rapid increase in the use of bisphosphonates in malignancy (especially breast cancer and myeloma). Careful assessment of the health-care economics of this new treatment modality is urgently needed.

Single-dose intravenous therapy with pamidronate for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: comparison of 30-, 60-, and 90-mg dosages

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy, dose-response relationship, and safety of 30, 60, and 90 mg of a single intravenous dose of an aminobisphosphonate, pamidronate (APD), for the treatment of moderate to severe hypercalcemia of malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven cancer and a corrected serum calcium level of at least 12.0 mg/dL after 48 hours of normal saline hydration were enrolled in a double-blind, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Pamidronate in 30-, 60-, or 90-mg doses was administered as a single 24-hour infusion. Serum calcium corrected for albumin, urine hydroxyproline, and calcium excretion, and serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) (1-84) were determined before and after pamidronate therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-two men and 18 women entered the study. A dose-response relationship for normalization of corrected serum calcium was seen after pamidronate administration. Corrected serum calcium normalized in 40% of patients who received 30 mg, in 61% of patients who received 60 mg, and in 100% of patients who received 90 mg of pamidronate. The decline in the serum calcium level was associated with decreased osteoclastic skeletal resorption evidenced by a decrease in urine calcium and hydroxyproline excretion. Among those with a normalized corrected serum calcium level, the mean (median) duration of normalization of the corrected serum calcium value was 9.2 (4), 13.3 (5), and 10.8 (6) days in the 30-, 60-, and 90-mg treatment groups, respectively. The response of hypercalcemia to pamidronate was not significantly influenced by the presence of skeletal metastases. PTH 1-84, suppressed in patients on entry into this study, increased to a greater extent in those patients with osteolytic skeletal metastases compared with those with humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy. Clinical improvement, including improved mental status and decreased anorexia, accompanied the decline in the corrected serum calcium level in all three treatment groups. Side effects included low-grade fever, asymptomatic hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypophosphatemia.

CONCLUSIONS

A single-dose infusion of 60 to 90 mg of pamidronate was highly effective and well tolerated and normalized corrected serum calcium in nearly all patients (61% to 100%) with hypercalcemia of malignancy.

Urinary excretion of aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate in cancer patients after single intravenous infusions

The effect of the rate of infusion of disodium aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate (APD; CGP 23339A), an inhibitor of bone resorption, on urinary excretion of this agent was studied in a randomized open-label study in 20 cancer patients. Ten patients received 60 mg of APD over 4 h, and the remaining 10 patients received the same dose over 24 h. Urine collected during specified intervals for 72 h after the start of the infusion was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for unchanged APD. Mild and transient adverse experiences were observed in 12 (60%) patients; the most common were headache, fever, and phlebitis at the infusion site. No clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were observed, and none of the experiences were serious enough to require discontinuation of treatment. Cumulative urinary excretion of APD was a linear function of time, increasing rapidly after both the 4- and 24-h infusions were started. The mean (+/- standard deviation) cumulative urinary excretion of APD was 51.1 +/- 13.0% of the dose in the 20 patients, 55.0 +/- 15.0% in the 10 patients given the 4-h infusion, and 47.2 +/- 9.9% in the 10 patients receiving the 24-h infusion. Thus, the rate of infusion of the 60-mg dose did not influence retention of APD at 72 h after the start of therapy. Similarly, the presence or absence of bone metastases did not influence cumulative urinary excretion or the retention of APD.