A randomized multicenter trial of cyclophosphamide, Novantrone and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Mitoxantrone as First-Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapsed Breast Cancer

Mitoxantrone was administered at the dose of 14 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks to 25 consecutive women with measurable progressive disease who relapsed after adjuvant CMF and endocrine therapy. The treatment plan consisted in the delivery of 6 cycles, unless disease progression or severe toxicity occurred. All patients were evaluable for drug response and toxicity. One patient achieved complete remission and 6 partial remission, for a total response rate of 28%. Objective tumor response was observed in all major sites of disease. The median time to achieve remission was 3 months. The median duration of response was 7 months (range, 5–39+), and the median survival for the entire group was 10 months (range, 3–39). Results were influenced only by the duration of diseasefree status from the end of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy. In fact, all tumor responses were documented in woman with free intervals exceeding 1 year (7 of 17 or 41 %). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with 10 patients developing leukopenia at some time during treatment. Only 2 patients received less than 75 % of the projected dose because of granulocytopenia. Complete alopecia occurred in only 2 cases. Three patients developed a fall > 15 % in left ventricular ejection fraction, but no episode of congestive heart failure was observed. We conclude that mitoxantrone is an effective and safe drug which can be utilized in women relapsing after adjuvant CMF.

Mitoxantrone, More than Just Another Topoisomerase II Poison

Mitoxantrone is a synthetic anthracenedione originally developed to improve the therapeutic profile of the anthracyclines and is commonly applied in the treatment of breast and prostate cancers, lymphomas, and leukemias. A comprehensive overview of the drug's molecular, biochemical, and cellular pharmacology is presented here, beginning with the cardiotoxic nature of its predecessor doxorubicin and how these properties shaped the pharmacology of mitoxantrone itself. Although mitoxantrone is firmly established as a DNA topoisomerase II poison within mammalian cells, it is now clear that the drug interacts with a much broader range of biological macromolecules both covalently and noncovalently. Here, we consider each of these interactions in the context of their wider biological relevance to cancer therapy and highlight how they may be exploited to further enhance the therapeutic value of mitoxantrone. In doing so, it is now clear that mitoxantrone is more than just another topoisomerase II poison.

A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer

One hundred patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomly selected to receive combined chemotherapy treatment with adriamycin (50 mg/m2) or mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2) associated with 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 21 days with a maximum of ten cycles. All patients included in this study were under 75 years of age and had ECOG performance status of less than 4. They had not been treated previously with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, which could not have included anthracyclines, had to have relapsed at least 12 months after the completion of therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment characteristics or metastatic disease location between the two groups. Ninety-four patients were assessable for response. No differences were observed in response rate or in survival between the groups. The response rate (complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)) was 68% (13% CR and 55% PR for CAF; 0% CR and 68% PR for CNF). Median survival for all patients was 19 months (18 months with CAF and 19 months with CNF). All patients were assessable for toxicity. There were no differences in gastrointestinal and cardiac toxicity. More grade I-II hematologic toxicity episodes (p < 0.001) and treatment delays (p = 0.05) due to leucopenia were observed with the CNF group, and more grade III alopecia (p < 0.001) was observed with the CAF group. Patients received further therapeutic manoeuvres after finishing the study with a sequential treatment consisting of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy with mitomycin (M) -vinblastine (Vbl) (M 10 mg/m2 day 1, Vbl 5 mg/m2 days 1, 15 and 29; maximum 5 cycles). This chemotherapy treatment was received by 32 patients, with a response rate of 34% and grade III-IV hematologic toxicity of 37%. Treatment with CNF can be considered a good alternative to CAF for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. M-Vbl treatment is useful as second-line treatment in patients with prior adriamycin exposure.

Prednimustine combined with mitoxantrone and 5-fluorouracil for first and second-line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer

A total of 60 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with a combination of prednimustine (P: 110 mg/m2, days 1-5), mitoxantrone (M: 12 mg/m2, day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (F: 500 mg/m2, day 1) (PMF). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. In all 53 patients were evaluable for response. A total of 12 subjects had failed prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. In response to PMF treatment we observed 21 partial remissions and 3 complete remissions, amounting to a total response rate of 45%. The median duration of response was 39 weeks, and median survival was 56 weeks. Dose-limiting side effects were leukopenia (40 cases) and thrombocytopenia (11 patients). Nausea and vomiting was experienced by 93% of subjects; in 56% of cases it reached WHO stage II-III. Alopecia occurred in 18% of our patients. Our results suggest that PMF represents an active regimen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and yields a response rate of 45%. Considering that the majority of our patients had not received prior chemotherapy, the question remains open as to whether a 45% response rate outweighs the observed toxicity.

Treatment toxicity reduction: breast cancer

Since curative treatment of advanced breast cancer is still beyond our reach, the importance of reducing overall toxicity of systemic treatment must be stressed. This seems to be possible by adapting the form and intensity of therapy to the prognosis and stage of disease and by using drugs exhibiting high antitumoral efficacy combined with low systemic toxicity. In 475 patients with metastatic breast cancer, we initiated a prognosis-oriented therapeutic strategy. We developed a prognostic score so as to classify patients into 'high' and 'low' risk groups. In this way we were able to separate patients into two groups with statistically different survival times. In addition, we found that the impact of the first polychemotherapy on survival is different when comparing patient with favourable and unfavourable prognostic scores. Patients with favourable prognostic factors had exactly the same survival time independent of tumour progression, stable disease or even partial remission. Only patients achieving a complete remission survived longer. In contrast, patients with unfavourable prognostic factors apparently benefited from chemotherapy. Patients achieving stable disease or objective tumour remission had a significantly longer survival time than those patients with immediate tumour progression. Additionally, for most of the patients in this group, chemotherapy induced a transient stabilization or improvement of tumour induced symptoms. Therefore, we conclude that chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer is necessary. However, to reduce overall toxicity, it must be planned and administered according to the prognostic picture of the individual patient.

Mitoxantrone

Mitoxantrone is an anthraquinone antineoplastic agent with structural similarities to doxorubicin. It has a mechanism of action similar to the anthracyclines. Its primary elimination route is hepatic metabolism (only seven percent renal excretion) and it has a terminal half-life of approximately 40 hours. Mitoxantrone has significant activity in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, acute leukemias, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Some activity is reported in head and neck cancer, Hodgkin's, myeloma, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and liver cancer. There is a suggestion of incomplete cross-resistance between mitoxantrone and the anthracyclines in certain neoplasms. Some activity is reported with mitoxantrone in patients refractory to the anthracyclines in breast cancer, acute leukemias, and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. The usual doses used in solid tumors and in lymphomas are mitoxantrone 12-14 mg/m2 iv q3-4wk and in leukemias is mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2/d X 5 d iv for initial induction.