1
|
Cirulli GO, Corsi N, Rakic I, Stephens A, Chiarelli G, Finati M, Davis M, Tinsley S, Sood A, Buffi N, Lughezzani G, Carrieri G, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Rogers C, Abdollah F. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on survival in surgically treated upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide analysis. BJU Int 2024; 133:555-563. [PMID: 38097533 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the prognostic ability of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) using a large North American cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our cohort included 5940 patients with clinical M0 UTUC who underwent a radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), between 2010 and 2016, within the National Cancer Database. The main variable of interest was LVI status, and its interaction with pathological nodal (pN) status. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict the OS also stratifying patients on LVI status. Cox regression analysis tested the impact of LVI status on OS after accounting for the available covariates. RESULTS The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at diagnosis was 71 (63-78) years and most patients had pathological T1 stage disease (48.6%). Nodal status was pN0, pN1 and pNx in 45.8%, 6.3% and 47.9%, respectively. Overall, 22.1% had LVI. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 32.6 (16.0-53.3) months. At the 5-year postoperative follow-up, the estimated OS rate was 28% in patients with LVI vs 66% in those without LVI (P < 0.001). When patients were stratified based on nodal status those rates were 32% vs 68% in pN0 patients (P < 0.001), 23% vs 30% in pN1 patients (P = 0.8), and 28% vs 65% in pNx patients (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the presence of LVI was associated with less favourable OS (hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.60-1.99; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our study assessed the impact of LVI on OS in patients with UTUC in a large North American nationwide cohort. Our series, as the largest to date, indicate that LVI is associated with less favourable survival outcomes in patients with UTUC after RNU, and this variable could be used in counselling patients about their prognosis and might be a useful tool for future trials to risk-stratify patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicholas Corsi
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ivan Rakic
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alex Stephens
- Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Giuseppe Chiarelli
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Finati
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Matthew Davis
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Shane Tinsley
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Akshay Sood
- Department of Urology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Nicolò Buffi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Craig Rogers
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Firas Abdollah
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hashimoto M, Fukuokaya W, Yanagisawa T, Yamamoto S, Koike Y, Imai Y, Iwatani K, Onuma H, Ito K, Urabe F, Tsuzuki S, Kimura S, Oyama Y, Abe HI, Miki J, Kimura T. Association between comorbidities and survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:612-619. [PMID: 38430304 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02482-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to investigate the relationship between comorbidities and survival in patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment. METHODS From February 2018 to October 2021, we analyzed the data of 185 consecutive patients with metastatic UC who received pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at The Jikei University Hospital and five affiliated hospitals. We used the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to assess the comorbidities. The outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To compare the survival differences, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and the IPTW-adjusted Cox regression hazards model were used. RESULTS After IPTW adjustment, patient characteristics were well-balanced between patients with high CCI and those with low CCI. The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS based on CCI revealed that the patients with high CCI (2 or more) had a shorter PFS (median, 1.6 vs. 2.8 months) and a shorter OS (median, 12.4 vs. 18.8 months) (0-1). Similarly, in the IPTW-adjusted Cox regression hazards model, patients with high CCI had significantly shorter PFS [HR, 1.84 (95% CI 1.26-2.68; p = 0.002)] and OS [HR, 1.98 (95% CI 1.20-3.27; p = 0.008)] than those with lower CCI. CONCLUSIONS High CCI was associated with a higher risk of disease progression as well as overall mortality in mUC patients treated with second-line pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Shutaro Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yuhei Koike
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yu Imai
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Hajime Onuma
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Kagenori Ito
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yu Oyama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - HIrokazu Abe
- Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Birtle AJ, Jones R, Chester J, Lewis R, Biscombe K, Johnson M, Blacker A, Bryan RT, Catto JWF, Choudhury A, Das P, Jagdev S, Powles T, Wagstaff J, Cheung KC, Cafferty F, Hall E. Improved Disease-Free Survival With Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Final Results of the POUT Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1466-1471. [PMID: 38350047 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.POUT was a phase III, randomized, open-label trial, including 261 patients with muscle-invasive or lymph node-positive, nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) randomly assigned after radical nephroureterectomy to platinum-based chemotherapy (132) or surveillance (129). Primary outcome analysis demonstrated that chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (DFS). At that time, the planned secondary outcome analysis of overall survival (OS) was immature. By February 2022, 50 and 67 DFS events had occurred in the chemotherapy and surveillance groups, respectively, at a median follow-up of 65 months. The 5-year DFS was 62% versus 45%, univariable hazard ratio (HR), 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.80, P = .001). The restricted mean survival time (RMST) was 18 months longer (95% CI, 6 to 30) in the chemotherapy arm. There were 46 and 60 deaths in the chemotherapy and control arms, respectively. The 5-year OS was 66% versus 57%, with univariable HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.00, P = .049) and RMST difference 11 months (95% CI, 1 to 21). Treatment effects were consistent across chemotherapy regimens (carboplatin or cisplatin) and disease stage. Toxicities were similar to those previously reported, and there were no clinically relevant differences in quality of life between arms. In summary, although OS was not the primary outcome measure, the updated results add further support for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with UTUC, suggesting long-term benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Jane Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Jones
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - John Chester
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Lewis
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Biscombe
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Johnson
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Blacker
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | - James W F Catto
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Prantik Das
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Fay Cafferty
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Loriot Y, Matsubara N, Park SH, Huddart RA, Burgess EF, Houede N, Banek S, Guadalupi V, Ku JH, Valderrama BP, Tran B, Triantos S, Kean Y, Akapame S, Deprince K, Mukhopadhyay S, Stone NL, Siefker-Radtke AO. Erdafitinib or Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1961-1971. [PMID: 37870920 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2308849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Erdafitinib is a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who have progression after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The effects of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progression during or after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or anti-programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] agents) are unclear. METHODS We conducted a global phase 3 trial of erdafitinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who had progression after one or two previous treatments that included an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive erdafitinib or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 266 patients underwent randomization: 136 to the erdafitinib group and 130 to the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 15.9 months. The median overall survival was significantly longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (12.1 months vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.88; P = 0.005). The median progression-free survival was also longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (5.6 months vs. 2.7 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (45.9% in the erdafitinib group and 46.4% in the chemotherapy group). Treatment-related adverse events that led to death were less common with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (in 0.7% vs. 5.4% of patients). CONCLUSIONS Erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alterations after previous anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; THOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03390504.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohann Loriot
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Nobuaki Matsubara
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Se Hoon Park
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Robert A Huddart
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Earle F Burgess
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Nadine Houede
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Severine Banek
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Valentina Guadalupi
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Ben Tran
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Spyros Triantos
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Yin Kean
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Sydney Akapame
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Kris Deprince
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Sutapa Mukhopadhyay
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Nicole L Stone
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| | - Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
- From the Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM Unité 981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif (Y.L.), the Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caremeau, Nîmes (N.H.), and Montpellier University, Montpellier (N.H.) - all in France; the Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan (N.M.); the Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (S.H.P.), and Seoul National University Hospital (J.H.K.) - both in Seoul, South Korea; the Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom (R.A.H.); Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC (E.F.B.); the Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (S.B.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (V.G.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain (B.P.V.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.T.); Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA (S.T., Y.K., S.A., N.L.S.); Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium (K.D.); Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ (S.M.); and the Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (A.O.S.-R.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gordetsky JB, Montgomery KW, Giannico GA, Rais-Bahrami S, Thapa P, Boorjian S, Frank I, Cheville J. The Significance of Squamous Histology on Clinical Outcomes and PD-L1 Expression in Bladder Cancer. Int J Surg Pathol 2022; 30:6-14. [PMID: 34180731 DOI: 10.1177/10668969211027264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives. To compare the clinicopathologic characteristics of urothelial carcinoma (UC), urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation (UCSD), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the bladder, which have been suggested to differ in terms of risk factors, immunophenotype, and prognosis. Methods. We evaluated the clinicopathologic features of radical cystectomy specimens between 1980 and 2015 with a diagnosis of SCC, UCSD, and UC. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (clinically available clones 22C3, SP142, and SP263) was performed on SCC and UCSD. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results. Of the 1478 cases, there were 1126 UC (76%), 217 UCSD (15%), and 135 SCC (9%). Bladder cancer was more common in men than women (80% vs 20%, P < .0001). However, a higher proportion of SCC and UCSD occurred in women (SCC-36%, UCSD-22%, UC-18%). Women were significantly more likely to be never smokers in all 3 cohorts (UC: 45% vs 16%, UCSD: 44% vs 12%, SCC: 40% vs 18%, P < .0001). Patients with SCC and UCSD were at a higher pathologic stage (>pT2) at the time of cystectomy (UCSD-74%, SCC 71%, UC-44%, P < .0001) and had worse CSS compared to patients with UC (P = 0.006). SCC had higher PD-L1 scores (all clones) than UCSD (P < .0001). PD-L1 22C3 (P = .02, HR: 0.36) and SP142 scores (P = .046, HR: 0.27) predicted CSS on Kaplan-Meier analysis for SCC cases. Conclusions. UC, UCSD, and SCC are associated with different risk factors, gender distributions, and clinical outcomes. PD-L1 is expressed in SCC and UCSD, suggesting some patients may benefit from targeted therapy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery
- Case-Control Studies
- Cystectomy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Prognosis
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Analysis
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/metabolism
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
Collapse
|
6
|
Ricci AD, Rizzo A, Mollica V, Schiavina R, Fiorentino M, Brunocilla E, Ardizzoni A, Massari F. Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a change of paradigm? A meta-analysis of aggregate data. Anticancer Drugs 2022; 33:e61-e68. [PMID: 34387596 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eligible studies were identified using Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and meeting abstracts. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Platinum-based AC was associated with improved DFS, while the benefit in OS and CSS was not statistically significant compared to observation. Conversely, platinum-based AC showed a modest OS benefit in an analysis combing multivariable HRs with estimated HRs from Kaplan-Meier curves. Our results suggest that platinum-based AC is associated with improved DFS and a modest OS benefit in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Ardizzoni
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fero KE, Shan Y, Lec PM, Sharma V, Srinivasan A, Movva G, Baillargeon J, Chamie K, Williams SB. Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Costs Associated With Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab085. [PMID: 34805743 PMCID: PMC8599752 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a heterogeneous disease that presents a clinical management challenge for the urologic surgeon. We assessed treatment patterns, costs, and survival outcomes among patients with nonmetastatic UTUC. Methods We identified 4114 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic UTUC from 2004 to 2013 in the Survival Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare population-based database. Patients were stratified into low- or high-risk disease groups. Median total costs from 30 days prior to diagnosis through 365 days after diagnosis were compared between groups. Overall and cancer-specific survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results After risk stratification, 1027 (24.9%) and 3087 (75.0%) patients were classified into low- vs high-risk UTUC groups. Most patients underwent at least 1 surgical intervention (95.1%); 68.4% underwent at least 1 endoscopic intervention. Patients diagnosed with high- vs low-risk UTUC were more likely to undergo nephroureterectomy (83.6% vs 72.0%; P < .001); few patients with low-risk disease were exclusively managed endoscopically (16.9%). At 365 days after diagnosis, costs of care for high- vs low-risk UTUC were statistically significantly higher ($108 520 vs $91 233; median difference $16 704, 95% confidence interval [CI] = $11 619 to $21 778; P < .001). Those with high-risk UTUC had worse cancer-specific and overall survival compared with patients with low-risk UTUC (cancer-specific survival hazard ratio [HR] = 4.14, 95% CI = 3.19 to 5.37; overall survival HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.62 to 1.96). Conclusions UTUC continues to be managed primarily with nephroureterectomy, regardless of risk stratification, and patients with high-risk UTUC have worse overall and cancer-specific survival. Substantial costs are associated with management of low- and high-risk UTUC, with the latter being more costly up to 1 year from diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Fero
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yong Shan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick M Lec
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aditya Srinivasan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Giri Movva
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jacques Baillargeon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Sealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, D'Andrea D, Grossmann NC, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Rink M, Karakiewicz PI, Motlagh RS, Katayama S, Lotan Y, Scherr D, Abufaraj M, Fajkovica H, Compérat E, Enikeev D, Shariat SF. Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Plasma Levels of Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Proteins on Disease Outcomes after Radical Cystectomy. J Urol 2021; 206:1122-1131. [PMID: 34181469 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to validate the association of plasma levels of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its soluble receptor (SuPAR) and its inhibitor (PAI-one) with oncologic outcomes in a large cohort of patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected preoperative blood samples from 1,036 consecutive patients treated with RC for UCB. Plasma specimens were assessed for levels of uPA, SuPAR and PAI-one. Retrospective logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess their correlation with clinical outcomes. The additional clinical net benefit provided by the biomarkers was evaluated using decision curve analysis. RESULTS Preoperative plasma uPA, SuPAR and PAI-one levels were significantly elevated in patients harboring adverse pathological features. Higher levels of all biomarkers were independently associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastasis; uPA levels were also independently associated with ≥pT3 disease. Preoperative uPA and SuPAR were independently associated with recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. The addition of these biomarkers to standard pre-treatment and post-treatment models improved the discriminatory power for prediction of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, and recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival by a prognostically significant margin. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed that elevated preoperative plasma levels of uPA, SuPAR and PAI-one are associated with features of aggressive disease and worse survival outcomes in patients treated with RC for UCB. These biomarkers hold potential in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from intensified/multimodal therapy. They also demonstrated the ability to improve the discriminatory power of predictive/prognostic models, thus refining personalized clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Douglas Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Harun Fajkovica
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fujii Y, Sato Y, Suzuki H, Kakiuchi N, Yoshizato T, Lenis AT, Maekawa S, Yokoyama A, Takeuchi Y, Inoue Y, Ochi Y, Shiozawa Y, Aoki K, Yoshida K, Kataoka K, Nakagawa MM, Nannya Y, Makishima H, Miyakawa J, Kawai T, Morikawa T, Shiraishi Y, Chiba K, Tanaka H, Nagae G, Sanada M, Sugihara E, Sato TA, Nakagawa T, Fukayama M, Ushiku T, Aburatani H, Miyano S, Coleman JA, Homma Y, Solit DB, Kume H, Ogawa S. Molecular classification and diagnostics of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2021; 39:793-809.e8. [PMID: 34129823 PMCID: PMC9110171 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is one of the common urothelial cancers. Its molecular pathogenesis, however, is poorly understood, with no useful biomarkers available for accurate diagnosis and molecular classification. Through an integrated genetic study involving 199 UTUC samples, we delineate the landscape of genetic alterations in UTUC enabling genetic/molecular classification. According to the mutational status of TP53, MDM2, RAS, and FGFR3, UTUC is classified into five subtypes having discrete profiles of gene expression, tumor location/histology, and clinical outcome, which is largely recapitulated in an independent UTUC cohort. Sequencing of urine sediment-derived DNA has a high diagnostic value for UTUC with 82.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. These results provide a solid basis for better diagnosis and management of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Fujii
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Suzuki
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kakiuchi
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Tetsuichi Yoshizato
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Andrew T Lenis
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shigekatsu Maekawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Akira Yokoyama
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Yasuhide Takeuchi
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Yoshikage Inoue
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Yotaro Ochi
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Yusuke Shiozawa
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Kosuke Aoki
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Kenichi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kataoka
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Division of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Masahiro M Nakagawa
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Yasuhito Nannya
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Hideki Makishima
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Jimpei Miyakawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Teppei Morikawa
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuichi Shiraishi
- Laboratory of DNA Information Analysis, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Kenichi Chiba
- Laboratory of DNA Information Analysis, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Hiroko Tanaka
- Laboratory of Sequence Analysis, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Genta Nagae
- Genome Science Division, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
| | - Masashi Sanada
- Department of Advanced Diagnosis, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya 460-0001, Japan
| | - Eiji Sugihara
- Research and Development Center for Precision Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8550, Japan
| | - Taka-Aki Sato
- Research and Development Center for Precision Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8550, Japan
| | - Tohru Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan
| | - Masashi Fukayama
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Ushiku
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Aburatani
- Genome Science Division, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
| | - Satoru Miyano
- Laboratory of DNA Information Analysis, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan; Laboratory of Sequence Analysis, Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Homma
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo 150-8935, Japan
| | - David B Solit
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Seishi Ogawa
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm 17177, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grivas P, Loriot Y, Morales-Barrera R, Teo MY, Zakharia Y, Feyerabend S, Vogelzang NJ, Grande E, Adra N, Alva A, Necchi A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Gupta S, Josephs DH, Srinivas S, Wride K, Thomas D, Simmons A, Loehr A, Dusek RL, Nepert D, Chowdhury S. Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma from a phase 2, open-label trial (ATLAS). BMC Cancer 2021; 21:593. [PMID: 34030643 PMCID: PMC8147008 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ATLAS evaluated the efficacy and safety of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with previously treated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). METHODS Patients with UC were enrolled independent of tumor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status and received rucaparib 600 mg BID. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat and HRD-positive (loss of genome-wide heterozygosity ≥10%) populations. Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined post-hoc as the proportion of patients with a confirmed complete or partial response (PR), or stable disease lasting ≥16 weeks. RESULTS Of 97 enrolled patients, 20 (20.6%) were HRD-positive, 30 (30.9%) HRD-negative, and 47 (48.5%) HRD-indeterminate. Among 95 evaluable patients, there were no confirmed responses. However, reductions in the sum of target lesions were observed, including 6 (6.3%) patients with unconfirmed PR. DCR was 11.6%; median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6-1.9). No relationship was observed between HRD status and efficacy endpoints. Median treatment duration was 1.8 months (range, 0.1-10.1). Most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were asthenia/fatigue (57.7%), nausea (42.3%), and anemia (36.1%). Of 64 patients with data from tumor tissue samples, 10 (15.6%) had a deleterious alteration in a DNA damage repair pathway gene, including four with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration. CONCLUSIONS Rucaparib did not show significant activity in unselected patients with advanced UC regardless of HRD status. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in patients with ovarian or prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03397394). Date of registration: 12 January 2018. This trial was registered in EudraCT (2017-004166-10).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue E, LG- 465, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
| | - Y Loriot
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Saclay, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | | | - M Y Teo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Y Zakharia
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplant, University of Iowa and Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - S Feyerabend
- Studienpraxis Urologie, Steinengrabenstraße 17, 72622, Nürtingen, Germany
| | - N J Vogelzang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, 3730 S Eastern Avenue, Las Vegas, NV, 89169, USA
| | - E Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Calle de Arturo Soria, 270 28033, Madrid, Spain
| | - N Adra
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, 535 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - A Alva
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - A Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Gupta
- Division of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 1950 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - D H Josephs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - S Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - K Wride
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | - D Thomas
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | - A Simmons
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | - A Loehr
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | - R L Dusek
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | - D Nepert
- Clovis Oncology, Inc., 5500 Flatiron Parkway, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA
| | - S Chowdhury
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust & Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lindskrog SV, Prip F, Lamy P, Taber A, Groeneveld CS, Birkenkamp-Demtröder K, Jensen JB, Strandgaard T, Nordentoft I, Christensen E, Sokac M, Birkbak NJ, Maretty L, Hermann GG, Petersen AC, Weyerer V, Grimm MO, Horstmann M, Sjödahl G, Höglund M, Steiniche T, Mogensen K, de Reyniès A, Nawroth R, Jordan B, Lin X, Dragicevic D, Ward DG, Goel A, Hurst CD, Raman JD, Warrick JI, Segersten U, Sikic D, van Kessel KEM, Maurer T, Meeks JJ, DeGraff DJ, Bryan RT, Knowles MA, Simic T, Hartmann A, Zwarthoff EC, Malmström PU, Malats N, Real FX, Dyrskjøt L. An integrated multi-omics analysis identifies prognostic molecular subtypes of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2301. [PMID: 33863885 PMCID: PMC8052448 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22465-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The molecular landscape in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is characterized by large biological heterogeneity with variable clinical outcomes. Here, we perform an integrative multi-omics analysis of patients diagnosed with NMIBC (n = 834). Transcriptomic analysis identifies four classes (1, 2a, 2b and 3) reflecting tumor biology and disease aggressiveness. Both transcriptome-based subtyping and the level of chromosomal instability provide independent prognostic value beyond established prognostic clinicopathological parameters. High chromosomal instability, p53-pathway disruption and APOBEC-related mutations are significantly associated with transcriptomic class 2a and poor outcome. RNA-derived immune cell infiltration is associated with chromosomally unstable tumors and enriched in class 2b. Spatial proteomics analysis confirms the higher infiltration of class 2b tumors and demonstrates an association between higher immune cell infiltration and lower recurrence rates. Finally, the independent prognostic value of the transcriptomic classes is documented in 1228 validation samples using a single sample classification tool. The classifier provides a framework for biomarker discovery and for optimizing treatment and surveillance in next-generation clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sia Viborg Lindskrog
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Frederik Prip
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philippe Lamy
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ann Taber
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Clarice S Groeneveld
- Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT) Program, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
- Oncologie Moleculaire, UMR144, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Karin Birkenkamp-Demtröder
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Trine Strandgaard
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Iver Nordentoft
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Emil Christensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mateo Sokac
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nicolai J Birkbak
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lasse Maretty
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gregers G Hermann
- Department of Urology, Herlev hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Astrid C Petersen
- Department of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Veronika Weyerer
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Marcus Horstmann
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Department of Urology, Malteser Hospital St. Josephshospital, Krefeld Uerdingen, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Gottfrid Sjödahl
- Division of Urological Research, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Mattias Höglund
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Torben Steiniche
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Karin Mogensen
- Department of Urology, Herlev hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Aurélien de Reyniès
- Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT) Program, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Roman Nawroth
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Brian Jordan
- Departments of Pathology, Urology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Xiaoqi Lin
- Departments of Pathology, Urology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dejan Dragicevic
- Clinic of Urology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Douglas G Ward
- Bladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anshita Goel
- Bladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Carolyn D Hurst
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Joshua I Warrick
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Ulrika Segersten
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kim E M van Kessel
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Urology and Martini-Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Departments of Pathology, Urology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David J DeGraff
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Richard T Bryan
- Bladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Margaret A Knowles
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Tatjana Simic
- Institute of Medical and Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ellen C Zwarthoff
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Per-Uno Malmström
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Núria Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco X Real
- Epithelial Carcinogenesis Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lars Dyrskjøt
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Paciotti M, Nguyen DD, Modonutti D, Haeuser L, Lipsitz S, Mossanen M, Kibel AS, Lughezzani G, Trinh QD, Cole AP. Impact of high-intensity local treatment on overall survival in stage IV upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:436.e1-436.e10. [PMID: 33736978 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the impact of high-intensity local treatment (LT) on overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the National Cancer Database, we identified 7,357 patients diagnosed with stage IV UTUC from 2004 to 2015. Patients who underwent high-intensity LT, defined as radical surgery of the primary tumor, were compared with those who did not. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Weighted survival analyses were used to test the association between high-intensity LT and OS. Multivariable Cox model was used to assess for independent predictors of OS. Sensitivity analysis was used to account for possible biases. RESULTS Among stage IV patients, 10.6% (n = 779) had locally advanced disease (T4), 32.6% (n = 2,399) had node-positive disease (N+) and 56.8% (N = 4,179) had distant metastases (M+). Fewer than half of the patients underwent high-intensity LT (n = 2,908, 39.5%) while the remainder did not. On IPTW-adjusted survival analysis, high-intensity LT was associated with a prolonged OS (11.17 months [IQR, 5.19 to 24.28] months vs. 6.18 months [IQR, 2.27 to 14.49], P ≤ 0.001). A similar benefit was seen on adjusted survival analyses for each stage IV subgroup, defined according to TNM characteristics. The survival benefit was confirmed at sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION High-intensity LT in balanced cohorts of patients with stage IV UTUC is associated with prolonged OS including those with locally advanced (T4), node-positive (N+) or distant metastases (M+).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Paciotti
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - David-Dan Nguyen
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Daniele Modonutti
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology-Urology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Lorine Haeuser
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Urology and Neuro-Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Stuart Lipsitz
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stone BV, Hill SC, Moses KA. The effect of centralization of care on overall survival in primary urethral cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:133.e17-133.e26. [PMID: 33268273 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Centralization of care to high-volume centers improves outcomes across urologic malignancies, but there exists a paucity of data for low-incidence cancers. Given the rarity of primary urethral cancer (UC) and the need for complex multidisciplinary treatment, we sought to evaluate differences in practice patterns and clinical outcomes across types of treating facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified all patients diagnosed with UC from 2004 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to investigate independent predictors of OS. The chi-square test was used to analyze differences in practice patterns. RESULTS We identified 6,445 patients with UC. Median overall survival was 40.5 months (interquartile range 38.4-42.6). There was a significant difference in OS based upon facility type, and this difference remained significant on subgroup analysis for squamous cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. Academic centers had superior OS on pairwise comparisons (all P< 0.05) and were associated with decreased risk of death, hazard ratio 0.858 (95% confidence interval 0.749-0.983). Academic centers had a significantly greater frequency of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation (P < 0.001). Academic centers performed radical surgery in 34.1% of patients compared to 14.5% in community programs (P < 0.001), and regional lymphadenectomy in 31.6% of patients compared to 13.2% in community programs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION There exist significant differences in survival for patients with UC based upon treating facility. Variations in practice patterns including multimodal treatment, radical surgery, and regional lymphadenectomy may contribute to the observed differences in clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin V Stone
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Stephen C Hill
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kelvin A Moses
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Quinn DI, Tsao-Wei DD, Twardowski P, Aparicio AM, Frankel P, Chatta G, Wright JJ, Groshen SG, Khoo S, Lenz HJ, Lara PN, Gandara DR, Newman E. Phase II study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid; SAHA) in recurrent or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium - an NCI-CTEP sponsored: California Cancer Consortium trial, NCI 6879. Invest New Drugs 2021; 39:812-820. [PMID: 33409898 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-020-01038-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Until the advent of T cell check point inhibitors standard second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) was undefined. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) have anti-cancer activity in a variety of tumor models including modulation of apoptosis in bladder cancer cell lines. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the HDACi vorinostat in patients with mUC failing first-line platinum-based therapy either in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting or for recurrent/advanced disease. METHODS Vorinostat was given orally 200 mg twice daily continuously until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was RECIST response rate (RR); a RR > 20% was deemed interesting in a 2-stage design requiring one response in the first 12 patients to proceed to 2nd stage for a total of 37 subjects. CT or MRI scan imaging occurred every 6 weeks. RESULTS Fourteen patients were accrued characterized by: median age 66 years (43-84); Caucasian (79%); males (86%); and Karnofsky performance status ≥90 (50%). Accrual was terminated in the first stage as no responses were observed. Best response was stable disease (3 patients). Progression was observed in 8 patients. Two patients came off therapy prior to re-imaging and a 3rd patient died while on treatment and was not assessed for response. Median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-11). Median disease-free survival and overall survival times were 1.1 (0.8, 2.1) & 3.2 (2.1, 14.5) months, respectively. Toxicities were predominantly cytopenias and thrombocytopenic bleeding. Two pts. had grade 5 toxicity unlikely related to treatment. Two pts. had grade 4 and 6 had grade 3 toxicities observed. Two patients with stable disease remained on therapy for 6+ cycles. CONCLUSIONS Vorinostat on this dose-schedule had limited efficacy and significant toxicity resulting in a unfavorable risk:benefit ratio in patients with mUC. NCT00363883.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David I Quinn
- Division of Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Suite 3440, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| | - Denice D Tsao-Wei
- Biostatistics Core, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Przemyslaw Twardowski
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
- John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Ana M Aparicio
- Division of Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Suite 3440, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Frankel
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Gurkamal Chatta
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - John J Wright
- Clinical Treatment Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Susan G Groshen
- Biostatistics Core, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stella Khoo
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Suite 3440, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Primo N Lara
- University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David R Gandara
- University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Edward Newman
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Joshi M, Grivas P, Mortazavi A, Monk P, Clinton SK, Sue‐Ann Woo M, Holder SL, Drabick JJ, Yin M. Alterations of DNA damage response genes correlate with response and overall survival in anti-PD-1/PD-L1-treated advanced urothelial cancer. Cancer Med 2020; 9:9365-9372. [PMID: 33098265 PMCID: PMC7774722 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations in cancer are associated with a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) and may impact clinical outcomes of urothelial cancer (UC). Here, we explore the prognostic role of DDR alterations in advanced UC treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. The study included 53 patients who had FoundationOne genomic sequencing and received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Fisher exact test and trend test were used to assess differences in objective response rate (ORR). Overall survival (OS) was measured from the time of initial UC diagnosis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The cohort had a median age of 66 with 64% receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. DDR alterations (including ATM) were associated with a non-significantly higher ORR to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade (41% vs. 21%, p = 0.136). Patients with DDR alterations (excluding ATM) had non-significantly longer OS, likely due to a small sample size (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.20-1.38, p = 0.19). ATM alterations were associated with a non-significantly higher ORR (40% vs. 29%, p = 0.6), but also with significantly shorter OS (HR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.65-19.74, p = 0.006). Patients with ≥ 3 DDR alterations (including ATM) had substantially higher TMB (p = 0.01) and higher ORR (80%) with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade versus 24% ORR in patients with <3 DDR alterations. In summary, DDR alterations were associated with non-significantly higher ORR and longer OS for patients with advanced UC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. ATM alterations were associated with shorter OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of WashingtonSeattle Cancer Care AllianceFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
| | - Amir Mortazavi
- Division of Medical OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOHUSA
| | - Paul Monk
- Division of Medical OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOHUSA
| | - Steven K. Clinton
- Division of Medical OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOHUSA
| | | | | | | | - Ming Yin
- Division of Medical OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOHUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fukushima H, Kijima T, Fukuda S, Moriyama S, Uehara S, Yasuda Y, Tanaka H, Yoshida S, Yokoyama M, Matsuoka Y, Saito K, Matsubara N, Numao N, Sakai Y, Yuasa T, Masuda H, Yonese J, Kageyama Y, Fujii Y. Impact of radiotherapy to the primary tumor on the efficacy of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced urothelial cancer: A preliminary study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:8355-8363. [PMID: 32886446 PMCID: PMC7666746 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors can potentially induce synergistic antitumor immune responses. However, little clinical evidence is established regarding their combination therapy. Here, we aimed to assess whether radiotherapy to the primary tumor impacts on the efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 98 advanced urothelial cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab in a second- or later-line setting using our multicenter cohort. Patients were categorized according to a history of radiotherapy to the primary tumor: patients previously exposed to radiotherapy to the primary tumor (Radiotherapy group, 17 patients [17%]) and those not (Nonradiotherapy group, 81 patients [83%]). The associations of radiotherapy to the primary tumor with objective response and survival were evaluated. The Radiotherapy group showed a significantly higher objective response ratio than did the Non-radiotherapy group (65% vs 19%; P < .001). The Radiotherapy group had a higher progression-free survival rate compared with the Nonradiotherapy group (52% vs 28% at 12 months; P = .078), but statistical significance was not reached. The Radiotherapy group had a significantly higher overall survival rate compared with the Non-radiotherapy group (77% vs 50% at 12 months; P = .025). From multivariate analysis, radiotherapy to the primary tumor was an independent predictor for longer overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.31; P = .032) along with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 and the absence of visceral metastasis. Therefore, radiotherapy to the primary tumor may enhance the efficacy of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced urothelial cancer.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/immunology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy
- Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects
- Chemoradiotherapy/mortality
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Progression-Free Survival
- Retrospective Studies
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Factors
- Time Factors
- Tokyo
- Tumor Microenvironment
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/immunology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Toshiki Kijima
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Shohei Fukuda
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Shingo Moriyama
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Sho Uehara
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Yosuke Yasuda
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Hajime Tanaka
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Soichiro Yoshida
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Minato Yokoyama
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Yoh Matsuoka
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Kazutaka Saito
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Nobuaki Matsubara
- Department of Breast and Medical OncologyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastKashiwaJapan
| | - Noboru Numao
- Department of UrologyCancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | | | - Takeshi Yuasa
- Department of UrologyCancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Hitoshi Masuda
- Department of UrologyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastKashiwaJapan
| | - Junji Yonese
- Department of UrologyCancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | | | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of UrologyTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sheng X, Yan X, Wang L, Shi Y, Yao X, Luo H, Shi B, Liu J, He Z, Yu G, Ying J, Han W, Hu C, Ling Y, Chi Z, Cui C, Si L, Fang J, Zhou A, Guo J. Open-label, Multicenter, Phase II Study of RC48-ADC, a HER2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:43-51. [PMID: 33109737 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48-ADC, a novel humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to standard therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a phase II, open-label, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with HER2+ (IHC status 3+ or 2+) locally advanced or mUC who previously failed at least one line of systemic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Forty-three patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 20.3 months. The overall confirmed ORR as assessed by the BIRC was 51.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.5%-66.7%]. Similar responses were observed in prespecified subgroups, such as those with liver metastasis and those previously treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies. The median PFS and OS were 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.6-8.9) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.1-NE), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were hypoesthesia (60.5%), alopecia (55.8%), and leukopenia (55.8%). Twenty-five (58%) patients experienced grade 3 TRAEs, including hypoesthesia (23.3%) and neutropenia (14.0%). No grade 4 or grade 5 TRAEs occurred. CONCLUSIONS RC48-ADC demonstrated a promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or mUC who had failed at least one line of systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinan Sheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xieqiao Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yanxia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Yao
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Luo
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute and Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Benkang Shi
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiyan Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center of China, Beijing, China
| | - Guohua Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China
| | - Jianming Ying
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weiqing Han
- Department of Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Changlu Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Yun Ling
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihong Chi
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chuanliang Cui
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Si
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianmin Fang
- RemeGen, Ltd., Yantai, Shandong, China
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Jun Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abdul-Muhsin H, De Lucia N, Singh V, Faraj K, Rose K, Cha S, Zhang N, Judge N, Navaratnam A, Tyson M, Ho T, Jacobsohn K, Castle E. Outcome prediction following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:133.e9-133.e16. [PMID: 33069555 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To predict overall survival, cancer, and metastasis specific survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS All nonmetastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU with a curative intent at 1 institution between December 1998 and January 2017 were included. Detailed data were collected. End points for this study included OS, CCS, and MFS. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted. Log Rank tests and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Backward elimination and boot strapping was used to identify the most parsimonious model with the smallest number of variables in order to predict the outcomes of interest. A separate second institution data base was used for external validation. RESULTS There were 218 patients in the development cohort. Mean follow-up was 42 months (±39.6). There was 99 (45.4%) deaths, 28 (12.8%) cancer related deaths, 72 (33%) recurrences, and 54 (24.8%) metastases. The c-index for our model was 0.71 for OS, 0.72 for MFS and 0.74 for CSS. The nomograms did not show significant deviation from actual observations using our calibration plots. We divided the patient into 3 different groups (low, intermediate and high risk) based on their final total score for each outcome and compared them. On external validation our accuracy was 78.4%, 71.4%, and 75.3% for OS, CSS, and MFS survival respectively. CONCLUSION We designed a predictive model for survival outcomes following RNU in UTUC. This model uses simple, readily available data for patients without the need for expensive or additional testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Noel De Lucia
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Urology, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Vijay Singh
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Urology, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Kassem Faraj
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Urology, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Kyle Rose
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Urology, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Stephen Cha
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Biostatistics, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Nan Zhang
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Biostatistics, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | - Mark Tyson
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Urology, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Thai Ho
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Erik Castle
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Department of Urology, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chan TC, Wu WJ, Li WM, Shiao MS, Shiue YL, Li CF. SLC14A1 prevents oncometabolite accumulation and recruits HDAC1 to transrepress oncometabolite genes in urothelial carcinoma. Theranostics 2020; 10:11775-11793. [PMID: 33052246 PMCID: PMC7546005 DOI: 10.7150/thno.51655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC), including upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma (UBUC), is a common malignant disease in developed countries. Oncogenic metabolic lesions have been associated with UC development. Methods: Using data mining, a series of studies were performed to study the involvement of SLC14A1 in UC specimens, animal models and UC-derived cell lines. Results: In two cohorts of UTUC (n = 340) and UBUC (n = 295), the SLC14A1 protein level was an independent prognostic factor. Epigenetic silencing contributed to SLC14A1 downregulation in UCs. Total and membranous SLC14A1 played tumor suppressive roles through the inhibition of cell proliferation and metastasis in distinct UC-derived cells and animal models. Functional SLC14A1 prevented the accumulation of arginine and urea, enhanced mitochondrial fusion and aerobic respiration, inhibited glycolysis by altering the expression levels of several related proteins and sensitized arginine-deprivation treatment in ASS1-deficient UC-derived cells. In vitro and in vivo, SLC14A1 inhibited the mTOR signaling pathway and subsequently tumorigenesis, supported by reduced arginine concentrations in vitro. Nuclear SLC14A1 transrepressed HK2 and DEGS1 genes via recruitment of HDAC1 and/or SIN3A to maintain metabolic homeostasis and thereafter impeded tumorigenesis. Conclusion: Clinical associations, animal models and in vitro indications provide solid evidence that the SLC14A1 gene is a novel tumor suppressor in UCs. Total and membranous SLC14A1 prevents urea and arginine accumulation via the mTOR signaling pathway. Nuclear SLC14A1 recruits HDAC1 to transrepress oncometabolite genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ti-Chun Chan
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Infectious Disease and Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Stem Cell Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Stem Cell Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Shin Shiao
- Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Yow-Ling Shiue
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Institute of Precision Medicine, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Feng Li
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Precision Medicine, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang Z, Zhou Y, Guan C, Ding Y, Tao S, Huang X, Chen L, Zhang F, Zhang R. The impact of previous cancer on overall survival of bladder cancer patients and the establishment of nomogram for overall survival prediction. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e22191. [PMID: 32957347 PMCID: PMC7505356 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate the role of previous cancer on overall survival in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) and to establish an effective prognostic tool for individualized overall survival prediction.A total of 78,660 patients diagnosed with BCa between 2000 and 2013 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, among which 8915 patients had a history of other cancers. We compared the overall survival between patients with and without previous cancer after propensity score matching and we further established a nomogram for overall survival prediction.Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors. The calibration curve and concordance index (C-index) were used to assess the accuracy of the nomogram. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to compare survival outcomes.BCa patients with previous cancer had worse overall survival compared with those without previous cancer (HR = 1.37; 95%CI = 1.32-1.42, P < .001). Cancers in lung prior to BCa had the most adverse impact on overall survival (HR = 2.35; 95%CI = 2.10-2.63; P < .001), and the minimal impact was located in prostate (HR = 1.16; 95%CI = 1.10-1.22; P < .001) for male and in gynecological (HR = 1.15; 95%CI = 1.02-1.30; P = .027) for female. The shorter interval time between 2 cancers and the higher stage of the previous cancer development, the higher risk of death. Age, race, sex, marital status, surgery, radiation, grade, stage, type of previous cancer as the independent prognostic factors were selected into the nomogram. The favorable calibration curve and C-index value (0.784, 95%CI = 0.782-0.786) indicated the nomogram could accurately predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rate of BCa patients.Previous cancer has a negative impact on the overall survival of BCa patients and requires more effective clinical management. The nomogram provides accurate survival prediction for BCa patients and might be helpful for clinical treatment selection and follow-up strategy adjustment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengquan Wang
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
| | - Yuan Zhou
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
- Department of Urology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Longzi, Bengbu, China
| | - Chao Guan
- Department of Urology Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Longzi, Bengbu, China
| | - Yinman Ding
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
| | - Sha Tao
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
| | - Xiaoqi Huang
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
| | - Fei Zhang
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
| | - Rentao Zhang
- Department of Urology Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xuancheng City, Xuanzhou, Xuancheng
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sotelo M, Alonso-Gordoa T, Gajate P, Gallardo E, Morales-Barrera R, Pérez-Gracia JL, Puente J, Sánchez P, Castellano D, Durán I. Atezolizumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer: a pooled analysis from the Spanish patients of the IMvigor 210 cohort 2 and 211 studies. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 23:882-891. [PMID: 32897497 PMCID: PMC7979625 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02482-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background The studies IMvigor 210 cohort 2 and IMvigor211 evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) upon progression to platinum-based chemotherapy worldwide. Yet, the real impact of this drug in specific geographical regions is unknown.
Materials and methods We combined individual-level data from the 131 patients recruited in Spain from IMvigor210 cohort 2 and IMvigor211 in a pooled analysis. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the overall study population and according to PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Results Full data were available for 127 patients; 74 (58%) received atezolizumab and 53 (42%) chemotherapy. Atezolizumab patients had a numerically superior median overall survival although not reaching statistical significance (9.2 months vs 7.7 months). No statistically significant differences between arms were observed in overall response rates (20.3% vs 37.0%) or progression-free survival (2.1 months vs 5.3 months). Nonetheless, median duration of response was superior for the immunotherapy arm (non-reached vs 6.4 months; p = 0.005). Additionally, among the responders, the 12-month survival rates seemed to favour atezolizumab (66.7% vs 19.9%). When efficacy was analyzed based on PD-L1 expression status, no significant differences were found. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred more frequently in the chemotherapy arm [46/57 (81%) vs 44/74 (59%)]. Conclusion Patients who achieved an objective response on atezolizumab presented a longer median duration of response and numerically superior 12 month survival rates when compared with chemotherapy responders along with a more favorable safety profile. PD-L1 expression did not discriminate patients who might benefit from atezolizumab.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/secondary
- Cohort Studies
- Female
- Humans
- Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/metabolism
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Progression-Free Survival
- Spain
- Survival Rate
- Treatment Outcome
- Ureteral Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ureteral Neoplasms/metabolism
- Ureteral Neoplasms/mortality
- Ureteral Neoplasms/pathology
- Urethral Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Urethral Neoplasms/metabolism
- Urethral Neoplasms/mortality
- Urethral Neoplasms/pathology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/metabolism
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sotelo
- Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Edificio Sur. Despacho 277, Avda Valdecilla s/n, 39005, Santander, Spain
| | | | - P Gajate
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Gallardo
- Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| | | | | | - J Puente
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Sánchez
- Medical Department, Roche Farma S.A., Madrid, Spain
| | - D Castellano
- Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Durán
- Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Edificio Sur. Despacho 277, Avda Valdecilla s/n, 39005, Santander, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chen CS, Lin CY, Wang CL, Wang SS, Li JR, Yang CK, Cheng CL, Chiu KY, Yang SF. Association between lymphovascular invasion and oncological outcome in node-negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma with different stage. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:132.e13-132.e26. [PMID: 32900630 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) on node-negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed in single tertiary referral center of middle Taiwan between 2001 and 2015. Seven hundred and twenty-eight patients were diagnosed of UTUC and underwent RNU with ipsilateral bladder cuff excision including 303 and 195 patients with N0 and Nx status respectively. LVI status was assessed as a prognostic factor for cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS LVI was observed in 82 patients (16.5%). LVI presentation associated with smoking status, advanced tumor stage, high tumor grade, positive surgical margin, and consequence lung/liver/bone metastasis. In the multivariate analysis, LVI was failed to predict CSS, OS, and disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 [0.55-2.09], 1.05 [0.62-1.79], 1.15 [0.69-1.92], in CSS, OS, DFS, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of pT1-2 disease, the CSS, OS, and DFS were associated with LVI status (HR [95% CI]: 2.29 [0.44-11.84], 3.17 [1.16-8.67], 2.66 [1.04-6.79], in CSS, OS, DFS, respectively). In contrast, there was no difference in pT3 disease. CONCLUSION In conclusion, LVI status was not associated with survival outcomes of node-negative UTUC in our study. The subgroup analysis showed different prognostic impacts of LVI status in node-negative UTUC with T1-2 and T3 stage. Further evidence to clarify the prognostic effect is needed to make LVI became a practical factor in clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan-Shu Chen
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Yen Lin
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Surgical Critical Care, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Li Wang
- Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Ri Li
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Li Cheng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Yuan Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan.
| | - Shun-Fa Yang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dason S, Cha EK, Falavolti C, Vertosick EA, Dean LW, McPherson VA, Sjoberg DD, Benfante NE, Donahue TF, Dalbagni G, Bochner BH. Late Recurrences Following Radical Cystectomy Have Distinct Prognostic and Management Considerations. J Urol 2020; 204:460-465. [PMID: 32253982 PMCID: PMC8532564 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Disease recurrence after radical cystectomy generally occurs within 2 years and has a poor prognosis. Less well defined are the outcomes in patients who experience a late recurrence (more than 3 years after radical cystectomy). We report our institutional experience with late recurrences and describe the relationships between time to recurrence, management strategies and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study cohort comprised 2,315 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma at our center between 2000 and 2014, of whom 617 had a recurrence. Median followup for survivors was 2.6 years after recurrence (IQR 0.95-4.5). For the study we considered disease recurrence as recurrences outside the urinary tract. We compared baseline characteristics and post-recurrence management between those with recurrence 3 or less and more than 3 years after radical cystectomy. RESULTS A total of 58 patients with late recurrence had significantly lower consensus T stage and lower frequency of nodal involvement. The average 1-year bladder cancer death rate from the time of recurrence declined from 66% to 50% to 33% for patients with recurrence times of 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after radical cystectomy, respectively. For patients who survived at least 1 year after recurrence, the estimated survival at 5 years after recurrence was 45% for those with late recurrence and 21% for patients who had an early recurrence. Local consolidative therapy (metastasectomy or radiation) was more common in patients with late recurrence (19% vs 3.6%, p <0.0001). Cancer specific survival in early recurring cases was significantly worse than in late recurring cases in the subset receiving local consolidation (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS The prolonged lifespan of patients experiencing a late recurrence after radical cystectomy can be leveraged to individualize management. There is strong rationale for investigating the role of metastasectomy in the management of late recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Dason
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eugene K. Cha
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Cristina Falavolti
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Emily A. Vertosick
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Lucas W. Dean
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Victor A. McPherson
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel D. Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicole E. Benfante
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Timothy F. Donahue
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Drakaki A, Pantuck A, Mhatre SK, Dhillon PK, Davarpanah N, Degaonkar V, Surinach A, Chamie K, Grivas P. "Real-world" outcomes and prognostic indicators among patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:76.e15-76.e22. [PMID: 32778476 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is no current standard of care for patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection or for those who cannot receive or decline cisplatin-based perioperative chemotherapy. Understanding current, real-world treatment patterns may help inform decisions from clinical, research, and population health management perspectives. We examined real-world treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors among Medicare beneficiaries with high-risk MIUC who did not receive adjuvant treatment after surgical resection. METHODS We identified patients with high-risk MIUC in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database who underwent surgical resection (radical cystectomy and/or radical nephroureterectomy). Eligible patients had indicators of high-risk MIUC and surgical resection between 2001 and 2013. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including comorbidities, American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) stage, tumor stage/grade and nodal status, and distribution of neoadjuvant treatment by the year of surgical resection were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed for the full cohort and by subgroups using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate patient demographics and clinical characteristics associated with OS and DFS. RESULTS A total of 665 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 75.5 years; most were men (61%) and had AJCC stage IIIA disease (69%). Neoadjuvant treatment increased over the entire study period, both overall (from 12% to 46%) and cisplatin based (from 5% to 38%). Median OS for the entire cohort was 23.1 months (95% confidence interval: 18, 27); median DFS was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval: 11.3, 16.8). AJCC stage IIIB/IVA was the most significant predictor of poor prognosis for both OS and DFS, followed by non-white race and comorbidity burden. CONCLUSION The prognosis for high-risk patients with MIUC remains poor, with significant risk of mortality within 2 years of radical cystectomy despite increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment. Unmet treatment needs persist for this difficult-to-treat patient population despite the increasing use of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allan Pantuck
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Karim Chamie
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Patel PM, Doshi CP, Belshoff A, Nelson M, Sweigert PJ, Bunn C, Kulshrestha S, Baker M, Woods M, Gupta GN. Optimal Cystectomy Outcome: A Composite Measurement Evaluating Quality of Care and Mortality Benefit. Urology 2020; 143:117-122. [PMID: 32504682 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence and impact of an "optimal cystectomy outcome" (OCO), a simplified performance metric that encompasses multiple patient-centered outcomes. METHODS We identified patients in the National Cancer Center Database undergoing radical cystectomy for stage cT2-cT3 urothelial carcinoma (2006-2014). OCO was defined as negative resection margin, adequate lymphadenectomy (>10 nodes), no prolonged length-of-stay (<75th percentile), no 30-day-readmission, and no 30-day-mortality. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models to identify factors associated with OCO and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 12,997 patients who fit the inclusion criteria, individual OCO components were attained at a relatively high rate; however, only 37.6% of patients met all 5 OCO criteria. Patients who underwent surgery at a high-volume (OR 2.45) academic facility (OR 1.60) using a minimally-invasive approach (OR 1.32) were more likely to receive an OCO. Patients were less likely to receive an OCO if they were older (OR 0.98), African American (OR 0.71), had Medicaid insurance (OR 0.66), or more comorbidities (OR 0.48) (all P <0.05). Patients who received an OCO were found to have a significantly lower risk of overall mortality (HR 0.69, P <0.05). CONCLUSION Various patient- and hospital-specific factors affect a system's ability to achieve OCO in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. OCO is directly associated with improved OS and has the potential to function as a composite performance metric for the quality of care in bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parth M Patel
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
| | - Chirag P Doshi
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Alex Belshoff
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Marc Nelson
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | | | - Corinne Bunn
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Sujay Kulshrestha
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Marshall Baker
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Michael Woods
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Gopal N Gupta
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Natale C, Leinwand G, Zeineddine F, Silberstein JL, Krane LS. Does muscle invasive bladder cancer following pelvic radiotherapy portend worse prognosis? A seer-based study. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020; 24:100177. [PMID: 32454387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although emerging evidence demonstrates increased risk of secondary bladder cancer following pelvic radiotherapy, the aggressiveness of these tumors is not well-characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Database, identified 25,734 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer following definitive therapy for previous pelvic malignancy. Kaplan-Meier curve analyses were utilized to determine overall survival with significance set at p<0.05. RESULTS Of the 25,734 patients, 11,376 (44.2%) received radiation treatment for their first cancer. Overall survival of bladder cancer was found to be 80%, 69.5%, and 49.2% at 1,2 and 5 years, respectively. There was no significant survival difference between groups whose first cancer was treated with or without radiation (p=0.8). A survival advantage was seen for the bladder cancer patients not treated with radiation for cervical (p=0.004), uterine (p=0.0006), and vaginal cancers (p<0.0001). Bladder cancer patients treated with radiation for prostate cancer showed a survival advantage (p=0.002). The average time to second cancer diagnosis was 6.5±6.1 years. Patients treated with radiation for first primary cancer showed a longer time to second cancer (7.2±6.0 years) compared to those treated without radiation (5.9±6.0 years) (p<0.01). CONCLUSION Patients with prior history of female cancers treated without radiation demonstrated significant survival advantage in second primary bladder cancer. A small significant survival advantage was seen in bladder cancer patients previously treated for prostate cancer with radiation. This data suggests that second primary bladder cancer following pelvic radiotherapy has similar biologic aggressiveness to urothelial carcinoma developing without a history of radiotherapy. MICROABSTRACT The overall survival of 25,734 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer following definitive therapy for a previous pelvic malignancy was 49.2% at 5 years. There was no significant survival difference between groups whose first cancer was treated with or without radiation. Second primary bladder cancer following pelvic radiotherapy has similar biologic aggressiveness to urothelial carcinoma developing without a history of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb Natale
- Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| | - Gabriel Leinwand
- Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| | - Farid Zeineddine
- Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| | - Jonathan L Silberstein
- Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| | - Louis S Krane
- Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Galsky MD, Arija JÁA, Bamias A, Davis ID, De Santis M, Kikuchi E, Garcia-Del-Muro X, De Giorgi U, Mencinger M, Izumi K, Panni S, Gumus M, Özgüroğlu M, Kalebasty AR, Park SH, Alekseev B, Schutz FA, Li JR, Ye D, Vogelzang NJ, Bernhard S, Tayama D, Mariathasan S, Mecke A, Thåström A, Grande E. Atezolizumab with or without chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (IMvigor130): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020; 395:1547-1557. [PMID: 32416780 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30230-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 470] [Impact Index Per Article: 117.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atezolizumab can induce sustained responses in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We report the results of IMvigor130, a phase 3 trial that compared atezolizumab with or without platinum-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma. METHODS In this multicentre, phase 3, randomised trial, untreated patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, from 221 sites in 35 countries, were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group A), atezolizumab monotherapy (group B), or placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group C). Patients received 21-day cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 body surface area, administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle), plus either carboplatin (area under the curve of 4·5 mg/mL per min administered intravenously) or cisplatin (70 mg/m2 body surface area administered intravenously) on day 1 of each cycle with either atezolizumab (1200 mg administered intravenously on day 1 of each cycle) or placebo. Group B patients received 1200 mg atezolizumab, administered intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The co-primary efficacy endpoints for the intention-to-treat population were investigator-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 progression-free survival and overall survival (group A vs group C) and overall survival (group B vs group C), which was to be formally tested only if overall survival was positive for group A versus group C. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02807636. FINDINGS Between July 15, 2016, and July 20, 2018, we enrolled 1213 patients. 451 (37%) were randomly assigned to group A, 362 (30%) to group B, and 400 (33%) to group C. Median follow-up for survival was 11·8 months (IQR 6·1-17·2) for all patients. At the time of final progression-free survival analysis and interim overall survival analysis (May 31, 2019), median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 8·2 months (95% CI 6·5-8·3) in group A and 6·3 months (6·2-7·0) in group C (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·82, 95% CI 0·70-0·96; one-sided p=0·007). Median overall survival was 16·0 months (13·9-18·9) in group A and 13·4 months (12·0-15·2) in group C (0·83, 0·69-1·00; one-sided p=0·027). Median overall survival was 15·7 months (13·1-17·8) for group B and 13·1 months (11·7-15·1) for group C (1·02, 0·83-1·24). Adverse events that led to withdrawal of any agent occurred in 156 (34%) patients in group A, 22 (6%) patients in group B, and 132 (34%) patients in group C. 50 (11%) patients in group A, 21 (6%) patients in group B, and 27 (7%) patients in group C had adverse events that led to discontinuation of atezolizumab or placebo. INTERPRETATION Addition of atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment prolonged progression-free survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with that observed with the individual agents. These results support the use of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a potential first-line treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Galsky
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | - Ian D Davis
- Eastern Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maria De Santis
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Kouji Izumi
- Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | | | - Mahmut Gumus
- Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Özgüroğlu
- Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Se Hoon Park
- Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | - Jian-Ri Li
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital, HungKuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Li K, Xie W, Gao L, Huang G, Zhou J, Mei B, Chen J. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival prognosis and pathological downstaging in patients presenting with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20184. [PMID: 32358407 PMCID: PMC7440286 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Controversy remains with using neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the peer-reviewed literature to assess the role of NAC in high-risk UTUC patients. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were the main sources of relevant studies. The search terms included: "Upper urothelial carcinoma"; "UTUC"; "Urinary tract cancer"; and "Transitional cell carcinoma" combined with "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy" and "adjuvant chemotherapy". We studied the relationship of UTUC and NAC. Overall survival, recurrent-free survival, cancer-specific survival and pathological response rate in patients treated with/without NAC before radical surgery were evaluated. RESULTS Five trials were selected, and included 532 participants. Each of the included studies was retrospective. The combined analysis showed that when compared to controls, the pooled hazard ratios of overall survival, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.64; P < .00001); 0.50 (95% CI, 0.37-0.66; P < .00001); and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.25-0.54; P < .00001), respectively. It indicates the beneficial effects of NAC for the prognosis of survival in UTUC. Additionally, NAC was significantly associated with T-stage down-grading (T3/4 to ≤T2; OR=7.58 [4.66, 12.33]; P < .0001) and pathological lymph node status (N+ to N0; OR = 6.24 [2.57,15.15]; P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS NAC treatment before radical nephron-ureterectomy significantly improves survival prognosis in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. However, considerable prospective and randomized studies are needed to confirm this perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Li
- Department of Urology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University
| | | | - Liang Gao
- Department of Urology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University
| | - Gaomin Huang
- Department of Urology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University
| | - Jiaming Zhou
- Department of Urology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University
| | - Baoyu Mei
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Urology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanchang University
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mori K, Janisch F, Mostafaei H, Lysenko I, Kimura S, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic value of preoperative blood-based biomarkers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:315-333. [PMID: 32088103 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the prognostic value of preoperative blood-based biomarkers in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy. METHODS PUBMED, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched in June 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared cancer-specific survival in UTUC patients with and without pretreatment laboratory abnormalities. Formal meta-analyses were performed for this outcome. RESULTS The review identified 54 studies with 23,118 patients, of these, 52 studies with 22,513 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Several preoperative blood-based biomarkers were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival as follows: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.06), C-reactive protein (pooled HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (pooled HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.30-2.17), white blood cell (pooled HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.02-2.46), De Ritis ratio (pooled HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.92-2.99), fibrinogen (pooled HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.86-2.68), albumin-globulin ratio (pooled HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.87-4.84), hemoglobin (pooled HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22-1.87), and estimate glomerular filtration rate (pooled HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.19-1.94). The Cochrane's Q test and I2 test revealed significant heterogeneity for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, white blood cell, hemoglobin, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.022; I2 = 50.7%, P = 0.000; I2 = 80.4%, P = 0.000; I2 = 88.3%, P = 0.010; I2 = 62.0%, P = 0.000; I2 = 83.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Several pretreatment laboratory abnormalities in patients with UTUC were associated with increased risks of cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, blood-based biomarkers may have the potential to serve as prognostic factors to assist patients and physicians in selecting appropriate treatment strategies for UTUC. However, considering the study limitations including heterogeneity and retrospective nature of the primary data, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ivan Lysenko
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Petrylak DP, de Wit R, Chi KN, Drakaki A, Sternberg CN, Nishiyama H, Castellano D, Hussain SA, Fléchon A, Bamias A, Yu EY, van der Heijden MS, Matsubara N, Alekseev B, Necchi A, Géczi L, Ou YC, Coskun HS, Su WP, Bedke J, Gakis G, Percent IJ, Lee JL, Tucci M, Semenov A, Laestadius F, Peer A, Tortora G, Safina S, Garcia Del Muro X, Rodriguez-Vida A, Cicin I, Harputluoglu H, Tagawa ST, Vaishampayan U, Aragon-Ching JB, Hamid O, Liepa AM, Wijayawardana S, Russo F, Walgren RA, Zimmermann AH, Hozak RR, Bell-McGuinn KM, Powles T. Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum-based therapy (RANGE): overall survival and updated results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:105-120. [PMID: 31753727 PMCID: PMC6946880 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30668-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ramucirumab-an IgG1 vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antagonist-plus docetaxel was previously reported to improve progression-free survival in platinum-refractory, advanced urothelial carcinoma. Here, we report the secondary endpoint of overall survival results for the RANGE trial. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled from 124 investigative sites (hospitals, clinics, and academic centres) in 23 countries. Previous treatment with one immune checkpoint inhibitor was permitted. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive web response system to receive intravenous ramucirumab 10 mg/kg or placebo 10 mg/kg volume equivalent followed by intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (60 mg/m2 in Korea, Taiwan, and Japan) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at baseline, and visceral metastasis. Progression-free survival (the primary endpoint) and overall survival (a key secondary endpoint) were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02426125; patient enrolment is complete and the last patient on treatment is being followed up for safety issues. FINDINGS Between July 20, 2015, and April 4, 2017, 530 patients were randomly allocated to ramucirumab plus docetaxel (n=263) or placebo plus docetaxel (n=267) and comprised the intention-to-treat population. At database lock (March 21, 2018) for the final overall survival analysis, median follow-up was 7·4 months (IQR 3·5-13·9). In our sensitivity analysis of investigator-assessed progression-free survival at the overall survival database lock, median progression-free survival remained significantly improved with ramucirumab compared with placebo (4·1 months [95% CI 3·3-4·8] vs 2·8 months [2·6-2·9]; HR 0·696 [95% CI 0·573-0·845]; p=0·0002). Median overall survival was 9·4 months (95% CI 7·9-11·4) in the ramucirumab group versus 7·9 months (7·0-9·3) in the placebo group (stratified HR 0·887 [95% CI 0·724-1·086]; p=0·25). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in 5% or more of patients and with an incidence more than 2% higher with ramucirumab than with placebo were febrile neutropenia (24 [9%] of 258 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 16 [6%] of 265 patients in the placebo group) and neutropenia (17 [7%] of 258 vs six [2%] of 265). Serious adverse events were similar between groups (112 [43%] of 258 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 107 [40%] of 265 patients in the placebo group). Adverse events related to study treatment and leading to death occurred in eight (3%) patients in the ramucirumab group versus five (2%) patients in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION Additional follow-up supports that ramucirumab plus docetaxel significantly improves progression-free survival, without a significant improvement in overall survival, for patients with platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clinically meaningful benefit might be restricted in an unselected population. FUNDING Eli Lilly and Company.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kim N Chi
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Syed A Hussain
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Evan Y Yu
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Boris Alekseev
- P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncological Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Géczi
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Yen-Chuan Ou
- Tungs' Taichung Metro Harbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Wen-Pin Su
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University & Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Pediatric Urology, Julius Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Marcello Tucci
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrey Semenov
- RBHI Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russia
| | | | | | - Giampaolo Tortora
- University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Garcia Del Muro
- Institut Català d'Oncologia L'Hospitalet, Institut d'Investigacio Biomedica de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Scott T Tagawa
- New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Oday Hamid
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yeh HC, Margulis V, Singla N, Hernandez E, Panwar V, Woldu SL, Karam JA, Wood CG, Weizer AZ, Raman JD, Remzi M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Haitel A, Roscigno M, Bolenz C, Bensalah K, Li CC, Ke HL, Li WM, Lee HY, Rapoport LM, Lotan Y, Kapur P, Shariat SF, Hsieh JT, Wu WJ. PTRF independently predicts progression and survival in multiracial upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2019; 38:496-505. [PMID: 31862213 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Polymerase I and transcript release factor (PTRF) has been implicated in cancer biology but its role in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unknown. From a pilot transcriptome, we identified PTRF was significantly upregulated in high stage UTUC. Bladder cancer transcriptome from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) supported our finding and high PTRF level also predicted poor survival. We, therefore, investigated the correlation of PTRF with patients' clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes in a multiracial UTUC cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS By immunohistochemical staining, PTRF expression was determined using H-score. PTRF expression of 575 UTUCs from 8 institutions, including 118 Asians and 457 Caucasians, was compared with various clinicopathologic parameters. Human urothelial cancer cell lines were used to evaluate the level of PTRF protein and mRNA expression, and PTRF transcript level was assessed in fresh samples from 12 cases of the cohort. The impact of PTRF expression on disease progression, cancer-specific death and overall mortality was also examined. RESULTS High PTRF expression was significantly associated with multifocality (P = 0.023), high pathologic tumor stage (P < 0.00001), nonurothelial differentiation (P = 0.035), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.003) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.031). PTRF mRNA expression was also markedly increased in advanced stage UTUC (P = 0.0003). High PTRF expressing patients had consistently worse outcomes than patients with low PTRF expression regardless of demographic variation (all P < 0.005). In multivariate analysis, high PTRF expression was an independent predictor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.69, P = 0.025), cancer-specific survival (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.28-3.42, P = 0.003), and overall survival (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.33-3.14, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Results indicate that PTRF is a predictive biomarker for progression and survival and an independent prognosticator of UTUC. Elevated PTRF could probably propel clinically aggressive disease and serve as a potential therapeutic target for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Elizabeth Hernandez
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Vandana Panwar
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Alon Z Weizer
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Roscigno
- Department of Urology, Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Leonid M Rapoport
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Payal Kapur
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jer-Tsong Hsieh
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Biotechnology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Institute of Medical Science and Technology, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Raza SJ, Miller C, May A, Davaro F, Siddiqui SA, Hamilton Z. Lymph node density for stratification of survival outcomes with node positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Can J Urol 2019; 26:9852-9858. [PMID: 31469641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of lymph node density (LND) as a predictor of survival outcomes has been studied with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Similar results can be postulated to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This study aims to determine the overall survival of patients with lymph node positive UTUC based on LND, utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was derived from NCDB Participant User Kidney Dataset using the histology code 'transitional cell carcinoma', utilizing pN+ patients from 2004-2015. LND was calculated as number of positive nodes divided by total number of nodes removed. Patients were stratified by traditional AJCC pN stage and compared to LND groups (< 30%, ≥ 30%). Primary outcome was overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 2049 patients were identified (pN1 = 1022, pN2 = 1027; LND < 30% = 370, ≥ 30% = 1679). Mean LND was 71%. Cox regression for mortality using pN stage was not significant (p = 0.11); however, Cox regression for mortality using LND group noted significantly worsened survival with LND ≥ 30% (HR 1.54, p = 0.001). Kaplan Meier analysis for overall survival at 2 years showed no difference between pN1 and pN2 stages (35.3% versus 34.1%; log rank p = 0.37). Kaplan Meier analysis for overall survival at 2 years revealed significant difference between LND groups (LND < 30%, 47.3% versus LND ≥ 30%, 32.0%; log rank p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS LND provides improved prognostic information regarding overall survival, compared to traditional AJCC pN staging. Future studies need to evaluate LND to improve prognostic understanding of lymph node positive UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Johar Raza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies of urinary tract. The current study aimed to investigate the role of insulin-like growth factor II messenger RNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) expression in the prognostic evaluation of non-muscle- invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out to examine IMP3 protein expression in specimens from 183 cases of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, 20 cases of muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma and 20 benign tissues adjacent to cancer tissue.The expression of IMP3 was not detected in the adjacent benign tissues. The expression intensity of IMP3 in muscle-invasive samples was significantly higher than that in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma specimens (P = .008). IMP3 expression was significantly related with advanced tumor stage (P < .001), advanced tumor grade (P = .004), and tumor recurrence (P < .001) in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinomas. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that IMP3-positive patients had much lower disease-free (P < .001), progression-free (P = .002) and metastasis-free (P = .019) survival rates compared with those with IMP3-negative tumors. By multivariable Cox analysis, we also found that IMP3 expression in non-muscle- invasive urothelial carcinomas proved to be an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of disease-free survival (HR: 2.52; 95% CI, 1.39-4.56; P = .002), progression- free survival (HR: 5.19; 95% CI, 1.54-17.46; P = .008) and metastasis-free survival (HR: 4.87; 95% CI, 1.08-22.02; P = .040).Our results demonstrate that the expression of IMP3 in non-muscle- invasive bladder cancer can serve as an independent predictor that will help recognize the subgroup of patients with a high ability to relapse, progress, and metastasize and who might get the maximum benefit from an early and more aggressive treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feiya Yang
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing
| | - Qiang Zhou
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing
| | - Lingquan Meng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing
- Department of Urology, Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, PR China
| | - Nianzeng Xing
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aly A, Johnson C, Yang S, Botteman MF, Rao S, Hussain A. Overall survival, costs, and healthcare resource use by line of therapy in Medicare patients with newly diagnosed metastatic urothelial carcinoma. J Med Econ 2019; 22:662-670. [PMID: 30836812 PMCID: PMC7384456 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1591424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Aims: Medicare patients with metastatic or surgically unresectable urothelial carcinoma (mUC) often receive platinum-based chemotherapy as first line of therapy (LOT), but invariably progress, requiring additional LOTs and healthcare resource use (HCRU). To better understand the evolving mUC treatment landscape, the economic burden of chemotherapy-based mUC treatments among US Medicare patients was estimated. Methods: Newly diagnosed Medicare patients with mUC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Patients were followed from diagnosis to death, disenrollment, or end of study to characterize LOTs (first [LOT1], second [LOT2], and third or greater [LOT3+]). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS) by LOT. HCRU and mean costs were reported over the follow-up period, LOT duration, and maximum LOT received. Results: Among 1,873 eligible patients with mUC (median age = 77 years; median follow-up = 7.5 months), 1,035 (55%) received no chemotherapy. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, 61% had LOT1 only, 25% had LOT1 and LOT2 only, and 14% had LOT3+. Median OS was 8.1 months, range was 4.3 (untreated) to 29.8 (LOT3+) months. HCRU frequency increased with additional LOTs. Mean cumulative per-patient cost was $82,912 for all patients, increasing with additional LOTs (untreated = $57,207; LOT1 = $99,213; LOT2 = $125,190; LOT3+ = $163,884). Mean per patient per month cost was $18,827 for all patients, decreasing with increasing number of LOTs received (untreated = $27,211; LOT1 = $9,601; LOT2 = $7,325; LOT3+ = $6,017). Limitations: Potential for treatment misclassification when using the algorithm defining LOTs and non-generalizability of results to younger patients. Conclusions: Over 50% of Medicare patients with mUC received no chemotherapy. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, most received only one LOT. Additional LOTs led to higher mean costs and HCRU, but as patients were followed longer, monthly costs decreased. As treatments evolve to include immuno-oncology agents, these findings provide a clinically relevant economic benchmark for mUC treatment across different traditional LOTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shuo Yang
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Sumati Rao
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arif Hussain
- University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center and Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Murakami Y, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Hirayama T, Utsunomiya T, Koguchi D, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Taoka Y, Irie A, Iwamura M. Impact of histologic variants on the oncological outcomes of patients with upper urinary tract cancers treated with radical surgery: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24:1412-1418. [PMID: 31197556 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01486-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No definitive evidence exists regarding the clinical significance of histologic variants (HV) in upper urinary tract cancer. We investigated the impact of HV on prognosis in patients with upper urinary tract cancer following radical surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 451 patients with upper urinary tract cancer who underwent radical nephroureterectomy at six affiliated hospitals from 1990 to 2015. Patients with distant metastatic disease prior to surgery and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded, leaving 441 eligible patients. Patients were classified into two groups: pure urothelial carcinoma (UC) and HV. The clinicopathological variables of each group were examined using Kaplan-Meier plots and proportional Cox hazard ratios (HR) to compare the oncological outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS HV included 37 patients (8%). Compared with the pure UC patients, HV patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; RFS p = 0.0002, CSS p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis for RFS revealed HV were independent predictors (HR 1.92; p = 0.026), but the association did not remain significant for CSS. There was no significant difference in CSS between the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group and the non-AC group for all HV patients, except in patients with ≥ pT3 tumor or positive lymph node status where the AC group had significantly favorable CSS. CONCLUSIONS HV in upper urinary tract cancer are independent predictors for RFS, but not for CSS. AC improved CSS for HV patients with ≥ pT3 tumor or positive lymph node status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, 2-8-18 Hashimoto, Midori-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5188, Japan
| | - Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, 6-100 Arai, Kitamoto, Saitama, 364-8501, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, 1-13-12, Minami-machi, Higashiyamato, Tokyo, 207-0014, Japan
| | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, 18-1 Sakuradai, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0314, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, 6-100 Arai, Kitamoto, Saitama, 364-8501, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fang Y, Cen JJ, Cao JZ, Huang Y, Feng ZH, Lu J, Wei JH, Chen ZH, Liang YP, Liao B, Luo JH, Chen W. Overexpression of EIF5A2 in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is a new independent prognostic marker of survival. Future Oncol 2019; 15:2009-2018. [PMID: 30931608 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To study the expression of EIF5A2 in urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and its clinicopathological features and prognosis. Methods: EIF5A2 expression was detected via immunohistochemistry in 101 patients. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the EIF5A2 low expression group had significantly longer overall survival (OS; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS; p < 0.001) than the EIF5A2 high expression group. The high expression of EIF5A2 significantly predict poor OS and PFS in the subset patients (p < 0.05). EIF5A2 was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001). The established nomogram model and its calibration curve predicted the probability of survival accurately. Conclusion: EIF5A2 is a potential molecular marker of poor prognosis in urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Fang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Jun-Jie Cen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Jia-Zheng Cao
- Department of Urology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Jiangmen 529030, PR China
| | - Yong Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Zi-Hao Feng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Jin-Huan Wei
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Zhen-Hua Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Yan-Ping Liang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Bing Liao
- Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Jun-Hang Luo
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
EKMEKCİ S, KÜÇÜK Ü, DERE Y, ÇAKIR E, SAYAR HC, ERGANİ B, ÇAKMAK Ö, BOZKURT O, YÖRÜKOĞLU K. 8-armed octopus: Evaluation of clinicopathologic prognostic factors of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary system. Turk J Med Sci 2019; 49:153-161. [PMID: 30764592 PMCID: PMC7350879 DOI: 10.3906/sag-1805-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/aim This study was designed to determine the characteristic features of upper urinary system urothelial carcinomas (UUSUCs) and to evaluate the clinicopathological parameters associated with prognosis. Materials and methods A total of 74 cases of UUSUC were included, from three different centers. Demographic data and histopathological features such as tumor localization, concomitant tumor in the urinary system, distant metastasis with overall survival and disease-free survival obtained from the hospital records were evaluated retrospectively. Histopathologic prognostic features such as grade, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, tumor necrosis, and surgical margin status were also evaluated. Results Seventy cases (94.6%) underwent open nephroureterectomy whereas 4 cases (5.4%) had laparoscopic nefroureterectomy. Thirty-eight (51.4%) cases were located in the pelvis, 7 (9.5%) in the ureter, 29 (39.2%) both in the pelvis and ureter. Fifty-six (75.7%) cases were alive; however, 18 (24.3%) patients were found to be dead. pTa, pT1, pT2, pT3, and pT4 tumors were reported in 16 (21.6%), 13 (17.6%), 4 (5.4%), 28 (37.8%), and 13 (17.6%) patients, respectively. Histopathologically, 17 cases (23%) were low-grade, 57 cases (77%) were high-grade. Statistically significant correlation was observed between overall survival and lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, tumor necrosis, and differentiation by univariate analysis. Only distant metastasis was statistically associated with overall survival by multivariate analysis. We found no significant relationship between disease-free survival and all parameters.Conclusions: Differentiation and necrosis of tumor, lymph node involvement, and presence of distant metastasis is associated with the overall survival of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sümeyye EKMEKCİ
- Department of Pathology, Health Sciences University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmirTurkey
- * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
| | - Ülkü KÜÇÜK
- Department of Pathology, Health Sciences University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmirTurkey
| | - Yelda DERE
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, MuğlaTurkey
| | - Ebru ÇAKIR
- Department of Pathology, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Katip Çelebi University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Hatice Ceren SAYAR
- Department of Pathology, Health Sciences University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmirTurkey
| | - Batuhan ERGANİ
- Department of Urology, Health Sciences University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmirTurkey
| | - Özgür ÇAKMAK
- Department of Urology, Health Sciences University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmirTurkey
| | - Ozan BOZKURT
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmirTurkey
| | - Kutsal YÖRÜKOĞLU
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, IzmirTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dotson A, May A, Davaro F, Raza SJ, Siddiqui S, Hamilton Z. Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder: poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24:706-711. [PMID: 30707342 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01409-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the bladder is a rare, aggressive malignancy. Unlike urothelial cell carcinoma, SCC is resistant to chemotherapy and guidelines recommend radical cystectomy (RC) without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We aimed to evaluate the current management and survival of patients with invasive SCC treated with or without NAC. METHODS 671 patients with invasive SCC bladder cancer from 2004 to 2015 in the National Cancer Data Base were identified. Patients were stratified by treatment with RC alone or NAC prior to RC (NAC + RC). Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and readmission. RESULTS Of 671 patients, 92.8% were treated with RC alone and 7.2% with NAC + RC. Cox regression for mortality was performed including age, Charlson score, clinical stage, and NAC. Increased risk of mortality was noted with increasing age (OR 1.01, p = 0.023) and Charlson score of 1-3 (HR 1.58-1.68, p < 0.05). NAC did not confer survival advantage (HR 1.17, p = 0.46). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the overall survival was equivalent (log-rank p = 0.804). Hospital stay and readmission were similar between RC and NAC + RC groups. CONCLUSIONS Analysis of a national tumor registry suggests a lack of overall survival benefit for NAC with localized, muscle invasive SCC of the bladder. Further research directed at chemotherapy regimens for SCC is needed to optimize treatment and improve survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Dotson
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Ave, 3rd Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Allison May
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Ave, 3rd Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Facundo Davaro
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Ave, 3rd Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Syed Johar Raza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Ave, 3rd Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Sameer Siddiqui
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Ave, 3rd Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Zachary Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, 3635 Vista Ave, 3rd Floor Desloge Towers, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Poletajew S, Biernacki R, Buraczynski P, Chojnacki J, Czarniecki S, Gajewska D, Pohaba T, Sondka J, Skrzypczyk M, Suchojad T, Wojtkowiak D, Zaforemski B, Zapala L, Zemla A, Radziszewski P. Stage of bladder cancer in Central Europe - Polish perspective. Neoplasma 2019; 63:642-7. [PMID: 27268930 DOI: 10.4149/neo_2016_420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Mortality rate from bladder cancer in Europe is the highest in its Central Region. This study is an attempt to find underlying factors by proper characterisation of large cohort of Polish patients with bladder cancer.This is a multicentre study enrolling 1360 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in years 2012-2013 in Poland. All patients underwent transurethral resection of the bladder tumor. Data on staging and grading of all cancers were collected, as well as several demographic and clinical factors were tested for the association with muscle invasiveness of the cancer.Mean age of the cohort was 69.6 years, male to female ratio was 3:1. Bladder cancer stage Ta, T1 and muscle-invasive (MIBC) was diagnosed in 533 (39.2%), 516 (37.9%) and 296 (21.8%) patients, respectively. Patients with MIBC were older (73 vs. 68 years, p<0.05), had lower body mass index (25.4 vs. 26.5 kg/m2, p<0.05), lower haemoglobin concentration (12.2 vs. 13.4 mg/l, p<0.05), longer history of haematuria (86.2 vs. 74.4 days) and longer time interval from first symptom to diagnosis (118.0 vs. 88.2 days), compared to patients with Ta and T1 tumors.High mortality rate from bladder cancer in Central Europe can result from very high incidence of high-risk T1 tumors and high prevalence of prognostic factors of poor survival.
Collapse
|
40
|
Al-Husseini MJ, Kunbaz A, Saad AM, Santos JV, Salahia S, Iqbal M, Alahdab F. Trends in the incidence and mortality of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder for the last four decades in the USA: a SEER-based analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:46. [PMID: 30630456 PMCID: PMC6327491 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5267-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) accounts for around 95% of bladder cancers and is the 4th most common cancer among men and the tenth most common in women, in the US. There is a constant need to clarify current TCC incidence and mortality rates among different population groups for better clinical practice guidelines. We aimed to describe the TCC incidence and incidence-based mortality by demographic and tumor-related characteristics over the last 40 years in the US. METHODS We obtained data from the SEER 18 registries to study TCC cases that were diagnosed between the years 1973 and 2014. We calculated incidence rates and incidence-based mortality rates in different demographic and tumor-related characteristics and expressed rates by 100,000 person-years. We then calculated the annual changes in incidence and incidence-based mortality rates and displayed them as annual percent changes (APCs). RESULTS There were 182,114 patients with TCC between 1973 and 2014 in the United States. Overall incidence rates of TCC increased 0.16% (95% CI, 0.02-0.30, p = .02) per year over the study period. However, the incidence declined significantly since 2007; (95%CI,-1.89- -0.77, p < .001), except among the elderly and African Americans, which increased significantly over the study period. Overall TCC mortality rates did not change over the study period. However, since 2000 it started to decrease significantly. CONCLUSION TCC incidence and incidence-based mortality rates had been showing significant increases over the previous decades. However, significant declines in both incidence and incidence-based mortality rates have been observed over the recent years, except in some patients with certain racial groups. Improved understanding of the etiological and ecological factors of TCC could lead to further declines in incidence and incidence-based mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmad Kunbaz
- Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Anas M. Saad
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria
| | - João Vasco Santos
- MEDCIDS – Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS – Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal
- Public Health Unit, AceS Grande Porto VIII – Espinho/Gaia, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sami Salahia
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Fares Alahdab
- Mayo Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Meng W, Efstathiou J, Singh R, McElroy J, Volinia S, Cui R, Ibrahim A, Johnson B, Gupta N, Mehta S, Wang H, Miller E, Nguyen P, Fleming J, Wu CL, Haque SJ, Shipley W, Chakravarti A. MicroRNA Biomarkers for Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Selective Bladder-Sparing Trimodality Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 104:197-206. [PMID: 30583038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trimodality therapy with maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor and definitive chemoradiation reserving cystectomy for salvage of local recurrence is an accepted treatment alternative to upfront cystectomy for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. There is a need for molecular biomarkers to predict which patients will respond to bladder preservation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We sought to identify biomarkers with the ability to predict response to chemoradiation and survival after selective bladder preservation therapy in a cohort of 40 patients using a microRNA profiling approach. In vitro experiments were performed using transitional cell carcinoma lines CRL1749, HTB5, and HTB4. RESULTS We identified a panel of microRNAs associated with overall survival in our bladder preservation cohort and in the TCGA cohort. We also identified several microRNAs, including miR-23a and miR-27a, microRNAs of the miR-23a cluster, to be suggestively associated with complete response to chemoradiation therapy. The microRNAs were significantly associated with overall survival in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. In vitro studies suggest that the functional roles of miR-23a and miR-27a involve targeting the SFRP1 protein, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway. The upregulation of β-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway mediated proliferation, migration, invasion, and sensitivity to radiation and cisplatin treatment in bladder cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that miR-23a and miR-27a act as oncomirs, and once independently validated, they may help appropriately triage selected bladder cancer patients to individualize treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rajbir Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joseph McElroy
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Ri Cui
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ahmed Ibrahim
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Pharmaceutical Industries, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt
| | - Benjamin Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | - Huabao Wang
- The Genomics Shared Resource, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Eric Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Phuong Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio Valley Medical Center, Wheeling, West Virginia
| | - Jessica Fleming
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - S Jaharul Haque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - William Shipley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stangl-Kremser J, D'Andrea D, Vartolomei M, Abufaraj M, Goldner G, Baltzer P, Shariat SF, Tamandl D. Prognostic value of nutritional indices and body composition parameters including sarcopenia in patients treated with radiotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Urol Oncol 2018; 37:372-379. [PMID: 30578161 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the prognostic importance of sarcopenia in survival in patients with high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) who were unfit for radical cystectomy or systemic chemotherapy and were, therefore, treated with radiotherapy only. METHODS We evaluated 94 patients treated with transurethral resection of the bladder and radiotherapy for UCB. Sarcopenia, identified from pretreatment computed tomography scans, was defined as a skeletal muscle index of <39 cm2/m2 for women and <55 cm2/m2 for men. Body mass index -adjusted definition of sarcopenia was used to evaluate for sarcopenic obesity. Univariate models were used to assess the association between body composition and nutritional parameters with survival outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 68 patients were eligible for the final analysis, and 49 (72%) patients were sarcopenic. After body mass index adjustment of the definition of sarcopenia, its prevalence changed to 53.8% in women and 52.7% in men. Median age was 82 (interquartile range [IQR] 75-86) years, with a median, age-adjusted comorbidity index of 7.5 (IQR 6-10). The median time of follow-up was 12.5 (IQR 5.1-23.5) months. There were 42 (61.7%) patients who died of any cause and 19 (45.2%) who died because of UCB during the study period. Of all the body composition and nutritional parameters investigated, sarcopenic obesity was associated with cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 1.4-16.7, P = 0.01) and a low prognostic nutritional index was associated with overall survival (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.9, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION In patients who are too high risk for the standard treatment of UCB, sarcopenia is highly prevalent, but not prognostic of survival. Nevertheless, sarcopenic obesity and the prognostic nutritional index might act as prognostic markers for patients with UCB undergoing radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mihai Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tirgu Mures, Romania
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Gregor Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascal Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Tamandl
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shah CH, Pappot H, Agerbæk M, Holmsten K, Jäderling F, Yachnin J, Grybäck P, von der Maase H, Ullén A. Safety and Activity of Sorafenib in Addition to Vinflunine in Post-Platinum Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (Vinsor): Phase I Trial. Oncologist 2018; 24:745-e213. [PMID: 30552156 PMCID: PMC6656519 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Lessons Learned. First trial to report safety and activity of the microtubule inhibitor vinflunine plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib in post‐platinum metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) patients. A recommended phase II dose was identified for the treatment combination of vinflunine plus sorafenib, with main adverse events including fatigue, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, hypertension, and hyponatremia. An overall response rate of 41% to second‐line vinflunine plus sorafenib treatment in patients with platinum‐resistant mUC was confirmed.
Background. Platinum‐progressive metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is a clinical challenge. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib has demonstrated varied activity in mUC. This trial was designed to examine safety and activity of vinflunine plus sorafenib in mUC. Methods. In addition to standard dose of vinflunine (320 or 280 mg/m2), patients received sorafenib (400, 600, or 800 mg/day), in a 3 + 3 dose‐escalation phase I design. Results. Twenty‐two patients (median age 62.5 years) were included. Five patients received vinflunine 320 mg/m2 and 17 received 280 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sorafenib with vinflunine 280 mg/m2 was 600 mg, and with vinflunine 320 mg/m2 it was not determined, owing to toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) grades 3 + 4 consisted of neutropenia (6 patients), febrile neutropenia (5), and hyponatremia (5). The overall response rate (ORR) in the efficacy‐evaluable patients was 41% (7 of 17), all partial responses evaluated by RECIST version 1.1. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (1.8–41.7). Conclusion. The defined recommended phase II dose (RPTD) was vinflunine 280 mg/m2 plus sorafenib 400 mg. Sorafenib was too toxic in combination with vinflunine 320 mg/m2. The ORR of 41% to this second‐line combination treatment of mUC is noteworthy and supports further trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl-Henrik Shah
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karin Holmsten
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Jäderling
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Jeffrey Yachnin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Per Grybäck
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Hans von der Maase
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Urothelial malignancies, including carcinomas of the bladder, ureters, and renal pelvis comprised ∼8% of new cancer cases in the USA in 2016. In the metastatic setting, 15% of patients exhibit long-term survival following cisplatin-based chemotherapy and in patients with recurrent disease, response rates to second-line chemotherapy are generally 15%-20% with a 3-month progression-free survival. However, recent advances in immunotherapy represent an opportunity to significantly improve patient outcomes. Moreover, the advent of next-generation sequencing has resulted in both an improved understanding of the fundamental genetic changes that characterize urothelial carcinoma (UC) and identification of several candidate biomarkers of response to various therapies. Incorporation of prospective genotyping into clinical trials will allow for the identification and enrichment of patients most likely to respond to specific targeted therapies and chemotherapy. Combining different therapeutic classes to enhance outcomes is also an area of active research in UC.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/antagonists & inhibitors
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/genetics
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Clinical Trials as Topic
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
- Gene Expression Profiling
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics
- Genotyping Techniques
- High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
- Humans
- Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods
- Mutation Rate
- Progression-Free Survival
- Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Urologic Neoplasms/genetics
- Urologic Neoplasms/pathology
- Urothelium/pathology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Iyer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Audenet F, Farkas AM, Anastos H, Galsky MD, Bhardwaj N, Sfakianos JP. Immune phenotype of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2018; 36:1741-1748. [PMID: 29860605 PMCID: PMC6207464 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2359-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the immune phenotype of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS We prospectively collected blood samples from patients with high-risk NMIBC treated at our institution. PBMC were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the frequency of T cells and NK cells and the expression of immunoregulatory molecules (Tim-3, TIGIT and PD-1). PBMC from healthy donors (HD) were included for comparison, and associations with response to BCG were investigated. RESULTS A total of 38 patients were included, 19 BCG responders and 19 BCG refractory. Compared to 16 PBMC from HD, the frequency of total NK cells was significantly higher in patients with NMIBC [15.2% (IQR: 11.4, 22.2) vs. 5.72% (IQR: 4.84, 9.79); p = 0.05], whereas the frequency of T cells was not statistically different. Both Tim-3 and TIGIT expressions were significantly higher in NMIBC compared to HD, particularly in NK cells [13.8% (11.0; 22.4) vs. 5.56% (4.20; 10.2) and 34.9% (18.9; 53.5) vs. 1.82% (0.63; 5.16), respectively; p < 0.001]. Overall, the expression of PD-1 in all cell types was low in both NMIBC patients and HD. The immune phenotype was not significantly different before and after initiation of BCG. However, the proportion of CD8+ T cells before BCG was significantly higher in responders. CONCLUSION The immune phenotype of PBMC from patients with high-risk NMIBC was significantly different from HD, regardless of the presence of disease or the initiation of BCG. Peripheral CD8+ T cells could play a role in response to BCG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Audenet
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam M Farkas
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Harry Anastos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nina Bhardwaj
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sonpavde GP, Mariani L, Lo Vullo S, Raggi D, Giannatempo P, Bamias A, Crabb SJ, Bellmunt J, Yu EY, Niegisch G, Vaishampayan UN, Theodore C, Berthold DR, Srinivas S, Sridhar SS, Plimack ER, Rosenberg JE, Powles T, Galsky MD, Necchi A. Impact of the Number of Cycles of Platinum Based First Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. J Urol 2018; 200:1207-1214. [PMID: 30012366 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the impact of the number of cycles of platinum based, first line chemotherapy (fewer than 6 cycles vs the conventional 6 cycles or more) on the survival of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used the RISC (Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium) database. The association of the number of cycles of chemotherapy with overall survival was investigated by Cox multiple regression analysis after controlling for recognized prognostic factors. We excluded patients who received fewer than 3 or more than 9 platinum chemotherapy cycles to reduce confounding factors. The primary analysis was a comparison of overall survival for 3 to 5 vs 6 to 9 cycles using 6-month landmark analysis when 281 death events were observed. RESULTS Of the 1,020 patients in the RISC 472 received cisplatin or carboplatin, of whom 338 and 134, respectively, were evaluable. A total of 157 patients received 3 to 5 cycles (median 4) and 315 received 6 to 9 cycles (median 6). There was no significant difference in overall survival between 3 to 5 and 6 to 9 cycles (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.78-1.33, p = 0.91). No significant interactions were observed for the type of platinum (p = 0.09) and completed planned chemotherapy (p = 0.56). The limitations of a hypothesis generating, retrospective analysis applied. CONCLUSIONS Four cycles of platinum based, first line chemotherapy appeared adequate and did not significantly compromise the survival of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. The omission of excessive cycles may avoid unnecessary cumulative toxicity and facilitate a better transition to second line therapy and investigational switch maintenance therapy strategies. These results require prospective validation but they may impact practice in select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luigi Mariani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Raggi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Evan Y Yu
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Guenter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, New York
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Matsuzaki K, Fujita K, Hayashi Y, Matsushita M, Nojima S, Jingushi K, Kato T, Kawashima A, Ujike T, Nagahara A, Uemura M, Imamura R, Yamaguchi S, Fushimi H, Miyamoto H, Morii E, Nonomura N. STAT3 expression is a prognostic marker in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201256. [PMID: 30091994 PMCID: PMC6084864 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) plays a prominent role in the growth and invasion of several types of solid tumors. In this study, to assess the expression status and prognostic significance of the STAT3 pathway in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), we immunohistochemically stained for STAT3 and STAT3 pathway proteins, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), in a tissue microarray containing 99 UTUC specimens. There were no significant associations between STAT3, S1PR1, or IL-6 expression pattern and tumor grade or pT stage. However, the patients with high STAT3 tumor had a significantly higher risk of both disease progression (p = 0.009) and cancer-specific mortality (p = 0.009), but not with tumors expressing S1PR1 or IL-6. High STAT3 expression in the nucleus was also associated with a significantly higher risk of both disease progression (p = 0.003) and cancer-specific mortality (p = 0.034). Multivariate analysis revealed that high STAT3 expression in the nucleus was significantly associated with cancer-specific survival after adjustment for pathological stage, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor grade (HR = 2.136, 95% CI = 1.009–4.767, p = 0.047). Our findings indicated that STAT3 could be a cancer-promoting factor and potentially a significant prognostic factor in UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyosuke Matsuzaki
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Yujiro Hayashi
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Matsushita
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nojima
- Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kentaro Jingushi
- Department of Therapeutic Urologic Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Taigo Kato
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsunari Kawashima
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ujike
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Nagahara
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Motohide Uemura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Therapeutic Urologic Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Imamura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Seiji Yamaguchi
- Department of Urology, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Fushimi
- Department of Pathology, Osaka General Medical Center, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Miyamoto
- Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Urology, and Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | - Eiichi Morii
- Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Klapheke A, Yap SA, Pan K, Cress RD. Sociodemographic disparities in chemotherapy treatment and impact on survival among patients with metastatic bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:308.e19-308.e25. [PMID: 29628318 PMCID: PMC5960436 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate how socioeconomic status and other demographic factors are associated with the receipt of chemotherapy and subsequent survival in patients diagnosed with metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS Using data from the California Cancer Registry, we identified 3,667 patients diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder between 1988 and 2014. The characteristics of patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy as part of the first course of treatment were compared using chi-square tests. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of chemotherapy treatment. Fine and Gray competing-risks regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate bladder cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, respectively. RESULTS Less than half (46.3%) of patients received chemotherapy. Patients from the lowest socioeconomic quintile were half as likely to have chemotherapy as those from highest quintile (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.4, 0.7). Unmarried patients were significantly less likely to receive treatment (odds ratio = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5, 0.7). Not receiving chemotherapy was associated with greater mortality from bladder cancer (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3, 1.5) and from all causes (hazard ratio = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.8, 2.1). CONCLUSIONS We found clear disparities in chemotherapy treatment and survival with respect to socioeconomic and marital status. Future studies should explore the possible reasons why patients with low socioeconomic status and who are unmarried are less likely to have chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Klapheke
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
| | - Stanley A Yap
- Department of Urology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Rosemary D Cress
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Faiena I, Salmasi A, Mendhiratta N, Lenis AT, Pooli A, Drakaki A, Gollapudi K, Blumberg J, Pantuck AJ, Chamie K. Overall survival in patients with residual disease after radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J Urol 2018; 36:1825-1833. [PMID: 29752514 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2327-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been shown to improve survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, there are a subset of patients who do not respond or progress despite systemic treatment. METHODS Data from the National Cancer Database on patients who underwent a radical cystectomy (RC) with or without NAC from 2006 to 2013 were abstracted. Covariates were balanced using inverse probability weighting methods. The primary outcome of overall survival in patients with residual disease by stage was evaluated using 90-day conditional landmark analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Secondary outcome of predictors of residual disease was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 20,128 patients met our inclusion criteria; 16,058 patients underwent RC only (80%) and 4070 underwent RC with NAC (20%). Patients who received NAC were younger and healthier, treated at an academic center, and presented with higher stage. NAC was associated with improved overall survival amongst patients with cT3-4aN0 (HR 0.84 95% CI 0.73-0.97; p = 0.02) and cN+ (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.86; p = 0.001). Predictors of no residual disease were NAC (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.14-0.21; p < 0.001) and treatment at an academic facility (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.60; p < 0.001). Patients with cT3-4a or cN+ had increased odds of having residual UC (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.53-2.64; p < 0.001, and OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.43-3.21; p < 0.001, respectively) compared with cT2. CONCLUSION In patients with residual UC, NAC is associated with a significant survival benefit in higher stage disease only. Furthermore, those treated with NAC or at an academic center were less likely to have residual disease. Given the toxicity of NAC, more prudent patient selection for NAC is warranted and requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izak Faiena
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
- , 300 Stein Plaza, Suite 348, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| | - Amirali Salmasi
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Neil Mendhiratta
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Andrew T Lenis
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Aydin Pooli
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kiran Gollapudi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy Blumberg
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Allan J Pantuck
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mo Q, Nikolos F, Chen F, Tramel Z, Lee YC, Hayashi K, Xiao J, Shen J, Chan KS. Prognostic Power of a Tumor Differentiation Gene Signature for Bladder Urothelial Carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:448-459. [PMID: 29342309 PMCID: PMC6279371 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Revised: 08/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBCs) cause approximately 150 000 deaths per year worldwide. Survival for MIBC patients is heterogeneous, with no clinically validated molecular markers that predict clinical outcome. Non-MIBCs (NMIBCs) generally have favorable outcome; however, a portion progress to MIBC. Hence, development of a prognostic tool that can guide decision-making is crucial for improving clinical management of bladder urothelial carcinomas. Methods Tumor grade is defined by pathologic evaluation of tumor cell differentiation, and it often associates with clinical outcome. The current study extrapolates this conventional wisdom and combines it with molecular profiling. We developed an 18-gene signature that molecularly defines urothelial cellular differentiation, thus classifying MIBCs and NMIBCs into two subgroups: basal and differentiated. We evaluated the prognostic capability of this "tumor differentiation signature" and three other existing gene signatures including the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; 2707 genes), MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA; 2252 genes/2697 probes), and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC; 47 genes) using five gene expression data sets derived from MIBC and NMIBC patients. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The tumor differentiation signature demonstrated consistency and statistical robustness toward stratifying MIBC patients into different overall survival outcomes (TCGA cohort 1, P = .03; MDA discovery, P = .009; MDA validation, P = .01), while the other signatures were not as consistent. In addition, we analyzed the progression (Ta/T1 progressing to ≥T2) probability of NMIBCs. NMIBC patients with a basal tumor differentiation signature associated with worse progression outcome (P = .008). Gene functional term enrichment and gene set enrichment analyses revealed that genes involved in the biologic process of immune response and inflammatory response are among the most elevated within basal bladder cancers, implicating them as candidates for immune checkpoint therapies. Conclusions These results provide definitive evidence that a biology-prioritizing clustering methodology generates meaningful insights into patient stratification and reveals targetable molecular pathways to impact future therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianxing Mo
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Fotis Nikolos
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Fengju Chen
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Zoe Tramel
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Yu-Cheng Lee
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Kazukuni Hayashi
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Jing Xiao
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Jianjun Shen
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
| | - Keith Syson Chan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX
- Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine (STaR) Center, Center for Drug Discovery, and Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|