1
|
Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, von Deimling M, Chlosta M, Quhal F, Pradere B, Karakiewicz PI, Mori K, Kimura T, Shariat SF, Schmidinger M. First-line immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated network meta-analysis including triplet therapy. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38659099 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the differential efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combined therapies among patients with intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), as recently, the efficacy of triplet therapy comprising nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib has been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three databases were searched in December 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with first-line ICI-based combined therapies. We performed network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs), in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC; we also assessed treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS Overall, seven RCTs were included in the meta-analyses and NMAs. Treatment ranking analysis revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved PFS, followed by nivolumab + cabozantinib (79%), and nivolumab + ipilimumab + cabozantinib (77%). Notably, compared to nivolumab + cabozantinib, adding ipilimumab to nivolumab + cabozantinib did not improve PFS (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.43). Regarding ORRs, treatment ranking analysis also revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib had the highest likelihood of providing better ORRs (99.7%). The likelihoods of improved PFS and ORRs of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib were true in both International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. CONCLUSIONS Our analyses confirmed the robust efficacy of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib as first-line treatment for patients with intermediate or poor IMDC risk mRCC. Triplet therapy did not result in superior efficacy. Considering both toxicity and the lack of mature overall survival data, triplet therapy should only be considered in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marcin Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Clinic of Urology and Urological Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jahrreiss V, Seitz C, Quhal F. Medical management of urolithiasis: Great efforts and limited progress. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:149-155. [PMID: 38680579 PMCID: PMC11053322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To provide a comprehensive review on the existing literature on medical management of urolithiasis. Methods A thorough literature review was performed using Medline, PubMed/PMC, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to December 2022 to identify publications on the medical management of urolithiasis. Studies that assessed dietary and pharmacologic management of urolithiasis were reviewed; studies on medical expulsive therapy were not included in this review. Results Medical management of urolithiasis ranges from the prophylactic management of kidney stone disease to dissolution therapies. While most treatment concepts have been long established, large randomized controlled trials are scarce. Dietary modification and increased fluid intake remain cornerstones in the conservative management of urolithiasis. A major limitation for medical management of urolithiasis is poor patient compliance. Conclusion Medical management of urolithiasis is more important in patients with recurrent urolithiasis and patients with metabolic abnormalities putting them at higher risk of developing stones. Although medical management can be effective in limiting stone recurrence, medical interventions often fail due to poor compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Jahrreiss
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Majdoub M, Yanagisawa T, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, von Deimling M, Kawada T, Rajwa P, Bianchi A, Pallauf M, Mostafaei H, Chlosta M, Pradere B, Karakiewicz PI, Schmidinger M, Rub R, Shariat SF. Role of clinicopathological variables in predicting recurrence and survival outcomes after surgery for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:1309-1323. [PMID: 38009868 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2% of all diagnosed malignancies worldwide, with disease recurrence affecting 20% to 40% of patients. Existing prognostic recurrence models based on clinicopathological features continue to be a subject of controversy. In this meta-analysis, we summarized research findings that explored the correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and post-surgery survival outcomes in non-metastatic RCC patients. Our analysis incorporates 99 publications spanning 140 568 patients. The study's main findings indicate that the following clinicopathological characteristics were associated with unfavorable survival outcomes: T stage, tumor grade, tumor size, lymph node involvement, tumor necrosis, sarcomatoid features, positive surgical margins (PSM), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), early recurrence, constitutional symptoms, poor performance status (PS), low hemoglobin level, high body-mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. All of which emerged as predictors for poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival. Clear cell (CC) subtype, urinary collecting system invasion (UCSI), capsular penetration, perinephric fat invasion, renal vein invasion (RVI) and increased C-reactive protein (CRP) were all associated with poor RFS. In contrast, age, sex, tumor laterality, nephrectomy type and approach had no impact on survival outcomes. As part of an additional analysis, we attempted to assess the association between these characteristics and late recurrences (relapses occurring more than 5 years after surgery). Nevertheless, we did not find any prediction capabilities for late disease recurrences among any of the features examined. Our findings highlight the prognostic significance of various clinicopathological characteristics potentially aiding in the identification of high-risk RCC patients and enhancing the development of more precise prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Affiliated to Technion-Israeli Institute of Technology, Hadera, Israel
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marcin Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University hospital, Krakow, Poland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ronen Rub
- Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Affiliated to Technion-Israeli Institute of Technology, Hadera, Israel
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Pallauf M, König F, Pradere B, Araki M, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. The Prognostic Value of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:535-543.e4. [PMID: 38336572 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with bladder cancer (BC) after radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus in April 2022 to identify studies assessing the prognostic value of TILs, including a subset of lymphocytes (eg, CD3, CD8, FOXP3), after RC. The endpoints were overall survival and recurrent free survival. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the evaluation method for TILs (ie, CD3, CD8, FOXP3, HE staining). RESULTS Overall, 9 studies comprising 1413 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that elevated expressions of TILs were significantly associated with favorable OS (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.83) and RFS (pooled HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.64). In subgroup analyses, high CD8+ TILs were also associated with favorable OS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80) and RFS (pooled HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36-0.76). Among 3 studies comprising 146 patients, high intratumoral TILs were significantly associated with favorable OS (pooled HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19-0.60). CONCLUSION TILs are useful prognostic markers in patients treated with RC for BC. Although the prognostic value of TILs is varied, depending on the subset and infiltration site, CD8+ TILs and intratumoral TILs are associated with oncologic outcomes. Further studies are warranted to explicate the predictive value of TILs on the response to perioperative systemic therapy to help clinical decision-making in patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Daneshjoo Blvd, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laukhtina E, von Deimling M, Pradere B, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Kawada T, Quhal F, Pallauf M, Bianchi A, Majdoub M, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, Mori K, Enikeev D, Fisch M, Moschini M, D'Andrea D, Soria F, Albisinni S, Fajkovic H, Rink M, Teoh JYC, Gontero P, Shariat SF. Urinary function in female patients after traditional, organ-sparing and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis. BJU Int 2024; 133:246-258. [PMID: 37562831 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine and summarize the available data on urinary, sexual, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes after traditional radical cystectomy (RC), reproductive organ-preserving RC (ROPRC) and nerve-sparing RC (NSRC) for bladder cancer (BCa) in female patients. METHODS The PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases were searched to identify studies reporting functional outcomes in female patients undergoing RC and urinary diversion for the treatment of BCa. The outcomes of interest were voiding function (for orthotopic neobladder [ONB]), sexual function and HRQOL. The following independent variables were derived and included in the meta-analysis: pooled rate of daytime and nighttime continence/incontinence, and intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) rates. Analyses were performed separately for traditional, organ- and/or nerve-sparing surgical approaches. RESULTS Fifty-three studies comprising 2740 female patients (1201 traditional RC and 1539 organ-/nerve-sparing RC, and 264 nerve-sparing-alone RC) were eligible for qualitative synthesis; 44 studies comprising 2418 female patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. In women with ONB diversion, the pooled rates of daytime continence after traditional RC, ROPRC and NSRC were 75.2%, 79.3% and 71.2%, respectively. The pooled rate of nighttime continence after traditional RC was 59.5%; this rate increased to 70.7% and 71.7% in women who underwent ROPRC and NSRC, respectively. The pooled rate of ISC after traditional RC with ONB diversion in female patients was 27.6% and decreased to 20.6% and 16.8% in patients undergoing ROPRC and NSRC, respectively. The use of different definitions and questionnaires in the assessment of postoperative sexual and HRQOL outcomes did not allow a systematic comparison. CONCLUSIONS Female organ- and nerve-sparing surgical approaches during RC seem to result in improved voiding function. There is a significant need for well-designed studies exploring sexual and HRQOL outcomes to establish evidence-based management strategies to support a shared decision-making process tailored towards patient expectations and satisfaction. Understanding expected functional, sexual and quality-of-life outcomes is necessary to allow individualized pre- and postoperative counselling and care delivery in female patients planned to undergo RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Matsukawa A, Kawada T, Katayama S, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Pradere B, Fukuokaya W, Iwatani K, Murakami M, Bensalah K, Grünwald V, Schmidinger M, Shariat SF, Kimura T. Updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with extended follow-up data. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2024; 73:38. [PMID: 38289361 PMCID: PMC10827892 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03621-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies are the recommended first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, no head-to-head phase-3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of different ICI-based combination therapies. Here, we compared the efficacy of various first-line ICI-based combination therapies in patients with mRCC using updated survival data from phase-3 RCTs. Three databases were searched in June 2023 for RCTs that analyzed oncologic outcomes in mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combination therapies as first-line treatment. A network meta-analysis compared outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR) rate. Subgroup analyses were based on the International mRCC Database Consortium risk classification. The treatment ranking analysis of the entire cohort showed that nivolumab + cabozantinib (81%) had the highest likelihood of improving OS, followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab (75%); pembrolizumab + lenvatinib had the highest likelihood of improving PFS (99%), ORR (97%), and CR (86%). These results remained valid even when the analysis was limited to patients with intermediate/poor risk, except that nivolumab + ipilimumab had the highest likelihood of achieving CR (100%). Further, OS benefits of ICI doublets were not inferior to those of ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations. Recommendation of combination therapies with ICIs and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on survival benefits and patient pretreatment risk classification will help advance personalized medicine for mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaya Murakami
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Clinic for Medical Oncology and Clinic for Urology, West German Cancer Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kawada T, Shim SR, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Pradere B, Yanagisawa T, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, von Deimling M, Teoh JYC, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Shariat SF. Diagnostic Accuracy of Liquid Biomarkers for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis of Multiple Thresholds. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00248-1. [PMID: 37981495 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Many liquid biomarkers have entered clinical practice with the praise to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), helping avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multianalyte biomarkers for csPCa detection using multiple thresholds. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive literature search was done through PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in March 2023 for prospective and retrospective studies reporting the diagnostic performance of liquid biomarkers for detecting csPCa. The outcomes of interest were the diagnostic performance of liquid biomarkers for csPCa detection and identification of optimal thresholds for each biomarker. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 49 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Using each representative threshold based on the Youden Index, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting csPCa were 0.85 and 0.37 for prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3), 0.85 and 0.52 for prostate health index (PHI), 0.87 and 0.58 for four kallikrein (4K), 0.82 and 0.56 for SelectMDx, 0.85 and 0.54 for ExoDx, and 0.82 and 0.59 for mi prostate score (MPS), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was highest for 4K (8.84), followed by MPS (7.0) and PHI (6.28). According to the meta-analysis incorporating multiple thresholds, the corresponding sensitivity was 0.77 for 4K, 0.69 for PHI, and 0.63 for PCA3; specificity was 0.72 for PHI, 0.70 for 4K, and 0.69 for PCA3. CONCLUSIONS Regarding the detection of csPCa, 4K had the highest diagnostic performance among the commercial liquid biomarkers. Based on the optimal thresholds calculated by the present meta-analysis, 4K had the highest sensitivity and PHI had the highest specificity for detecting csPCa. Nevertheless, clinical decision-making requires combination strategies between liquid and imaging biomarkers. PATIENT SUMMARY Novel biomarkers for prostate cancer detection were useful for more accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer to avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, AI-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Center: A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laukhtina E, Quhal F, von Deimling M, Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Majdoub M, Enikeev D, Shariat SF. For Which Patients Should Bladder Preservation Be Considered After a Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:900-902. [PMID: 37150628 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Given the morbidity associated with radical cystectomy (RC) and the significant survival benefit for patients who experience tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is growing interest in bladder preservation strategies for select patients who have a complete response (CR) to NAC. In this mini-review we discuss the concept of avoiding RC as an alternative option for patients who experience a clinical CR following NAC. Several studies support this concept, with comparable long-term survival outcomes observed for patients with cT0 disease after NAC and patients undergoing RC. However, the definitive approach and the optimal surveillance strategy for patients with a clinical CR who choose bladder preservation are lacking. A dynamic response-driven bladder preservation strategy is a highly anticipated option for patients and is needed to avoid debilitating overtreatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: For selected patients with bladder cancer who experience a complete response to chemotherapy before any surgery, close follow-up might be an alternative option to surgical removal of the bladder without compromising cancer control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yanagisawa T, Quhal F, Kawada T, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Deimling MV, Chlosta M, Pradere B, Karakiewicz PI, Mori K, Kimura T, Schmidinger M, Shariat SF. Association between age and efficacy of first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapies for mRCC: a meta-analysis. Immunotherapy 2023; 15:1309-1322. [PMID: 37694583 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2023-0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To compare the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients stratified by chronological age. Methods: According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, hazard ratios for overall survival (OS) from randomized controlled trials were synthesized. Results: Five RCTs were eligible for meta-analyses. ICI-based combinations significantly improved OS compared with sunitinib alone, both in younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients, whereas the OS benefit was significantly better in younger patients (p = 0.007). ICI-based combinations did not improve OS in patients aged ≥75 years. Treatment rankings showed age-related differential recommendations regarding improved OS. Conclusion: OS benefit from first-line ICI-based combinations was significantly greater in younger patients. Age-related differences could help enrich shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, 32253, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology & Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, 119435, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, 41-800, Poland
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20251, Germany
| | - Marcin Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Clinic of Urology & Urological Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, 30-688, Poland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, 31130, France
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics & Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, 19328, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, 15006, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY 10021, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology & Andrology, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Mori K, Shim SR, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Majdoub M, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Kimura T, Shariat SF, Rajwa P. Impact of performance status on efficacy of systemic therapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2023; 132:365-379. [PMID: 37395151 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with worse performance status (PS) treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), and non-metastatic/metastatic castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC/mCRPC), as there is sparse pooled data showing the effect of PS on oncological outcomes in patients with PCa. METHODS Three databases were queried in June 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing patients with PCa treated with systemic therapy (i.e., adding androgen receptor signalling inhibitor [ARSI] or docetaxel [DOC] to androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT]). We analysed the oncological outcomes of patients with PCa with worse PS, defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥ 1, treated with combination therapies and compared these to patients with good PS. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival. RESULTS Overall, 25 and 18 RCTs were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In all clinical settings, combination systemic therapies significantly improved OS in patients with worse PS as well as in those with good PS, while the MFS benefit from ARSI in the nmCRPC setting was more pronounced in patients with good PS than in those with worse PS (P = 0.002). Analysis of treatment ranking in patients with mHSPC revealed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS irrespective of PS; specifically, adding darolutamide to DOC + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with worse PS. Analyses were limited by the small proportion of patients with a PS ≥ 1 (19%-28%) and that the number of PS 2 was rarely reported. CONCLUSIONS Among RCTs, novel systemic therapies seem to benefit the OS of patients with PCa irrespective of PS. Our findings suggest that worse PS should not discourage treatment intensification across all disease stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Kawada T, Mori K, Fukuokaya W, Petrov P, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Majdoub M, Pradere B, Kramer G, Kimura T, Shariat SF. Efficacy of Systemic Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients With Visceral Metastasis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis. J Urol 2023; 210:416-429. [PMID: 37339479 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are limited pooled data showing the impact of visceral metastasis on oncologic outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with combination systemic therapies. We aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy of combination systemic therapies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with or without visceral metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three databases were queried in July 2022 for randomized, controlled trials analyzing metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with combination systemic therapy (androgen receptor signaling inhibitor and/or docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy) to standard of care. We analyzed the association between presence of visceral metastases and efficacy of systemic therapies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. The main and secondary outcomes of interest were overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. Formal meta-analysis using fixed-effect model and network meta-analysis using random-effect model were conducted. We followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) guidelines. RESULTS Overall, 12 and 8 randomized, controlled trials were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients, adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitor to standard of care improved overall survival in patients with visceral metastasis (pooled HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94) as well as in those without (pooled HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.60-0.72; no differences in both across- and within-trial approach; P = .13 and P = .06, respectively). On the other hand, the progression-free survival benefit from androgen receptor signaling inhibitor + androgen deprivation therapy was significantly lower in patients with visceral metastasis using across-trial approach (P = .03), while it did not reach statistical significance using within-trial approach (P = .14). Analysis of treatment ranking in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer showed that darolutamide + docetaxel + androgen deprivation therapy had the highest likelihood of improved overall survival irrespective of visceral metastasis. In post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitor to androgen deprivation therapy significantly improved overall survival in both patients with visceral metastasis (pooled HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98) and those without (pooled HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.55-0.72). No randomized, controlled trials reported the differential oncologic outcomes stratified by lung vs liver metastases. CONCLUSIONS Despite aggressive clinical behavior and worse trajectory of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with visceral metastasis, the effectiveness of novel systemic therapies is similar in both metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with and without visceral metastasis. Further well-designed studies with detailed visceral metastatic sites and number will enrich the clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Patrik Petrov
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rajwa P, Quhal F, Tsaur I. Current Management and Future Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. World J Urol 2023; 41:2005-2006. [PMID: 37524851 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04542-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 3 Maja Street 13-15, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department and Outpatient Clinic for Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
von Deimling M, Schuettfort VM, D'Andrea D, Pradere B, Grossmann NC, Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Majdoub M, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Mostafaei H, Fajkovic H, Teoh JYC, Moschini M, Karakiewicz PI, Fisch M, Rink M, Shariat SF. Predictive and Prognostic Role of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:430-441. [PMID: 36781346 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a persistent lack of validated biomarkers that identify patients most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive and prognostic impact of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in UCB patients treated with NAC and radical cystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of an international-multicenter database comprising 404 UCB patients staged cT2-4N0-3M0. The cohort was split into low and high NLR using an optimal cutoff value determined by maximizing Youden's index. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed with respect to several clinical endpoints. The discriminative ability of the models and the additive discriminative value of NLR was assessed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristics curves, C-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS A total of 169 patients (41.8%) had a high NLR, which was associated with a decreased probability of complete response (CR, OR: 0.24 [95% CI, 0.13-0.42], P < .001) and/or partial response (PR, OR: 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21-0.49], P < .001). Adding the NLR to predictive reference models significantly improved their accuracy for the prediction of both CR and PR. A high NLR was associated with poor survival outcomes in the pretreatment setting, however, it didn't meaningfully change the C-index based on the model. CONCLUSION We confirmed that an elevated NLR is an independent and clinically significant predictor of response to NAC and adverse pathological features in UCB treated with NAC plus RC. The accuracy of this biomarker in the age of immunotherapy warrants further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Karakiewicz PI, Miki J, Kimura T, Shariat SF. Role of pelvic drain and timing of urethral catheter removal following RARP: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2023; 132:132-145. [PMID: 37014288 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical value of routine pelvic drain (PD) placement and early removal of urethral catheter (UC) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), as perioperative management such as the necessity of PD or optimal timing for UC removal remains highly variable. METHODS Multiple databases were searched for articles published before March 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they investigated the differential rate of postoperative complications between patients with/without routine PD placement and with/without early UC removal, defined as UC removal at 2-4 days after RARP. RESULTS Overall, eight studies comprising 5112 patients were eligible for the analysis of PD placement, and six studies comprising 2598 patients were eligible for the analysis of UC removal. There were no differences in the rate of any complications (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.00), severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III; pooled OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.69), all and/or symptomatic lymphocele (pooled OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50-1.33; and pooled OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26-1.29, respectively) between patients with or without routine PD placement. Furthermore, avoiding PD placement decreased the rate of postoperative ileus (pooled OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.91). Early removal of UC resulted in an increased likelihood of urinary retention (OR 6.21, 95% CI 3.54-10.9) in retrospective, but not in prospective studies. There were no differences in anastomosis leakage and early continence rates between patients with or those without early removal of UC. CONCLUSIONS There is no benefit for routine PD placement after standard RARP in the published articles. Early removal of UC seems possible with the caveat of the increased risk of urinary retention, while the effect on medium-term continence is still unclear. These data may help guide the standardisation of postoperative procedures by avoiding unnecessary interventions, thereby reducing potential complications and associated costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Quhal F, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, von Deimling M, Majdoub M, Chlosta M, Pradere B, Mori K, Kimura T, Schmidinger M, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Impact of sex on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney and urothelial cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2023; 41:1763-1774. [PMID: 37209143 PMCID: PMC10352444 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04412-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze and summarize the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) alone or in combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) stratified by sex. METHODS Three databases were queried in October 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing RCC and UC patients treated with ICIs. We analyzed the association between sex and the efficacy of ICIs in RCC and UC patients across several clinical settings. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival for the metastatic setting and disease-free survival (DFS) for the adjuvant setting. RESULTS Overall, 16 RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses. In the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC) and UC (mUC) patients, ICI-based combination therapies significantly improved OS compared to the current standard of care, regardless of sex. Adjuvant ICI monotherapy reduced the risk of disease recurrence in female patients with locally advanced RCC (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.93) but not in male patients, and, conversely, in male patients with muscle-invasive UC (pooled HR: 0.80, 95%CI 0.68-0.94) but not in female patients. Treatment ranking analyses in the first-line treatment of mRCC and mUC showed different results between sexes. Of note, regarding adjuvant treatment for RCC, pembrolizumab (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved DFS in males, whereas atezolizumab (84%) in females. CONCLUSIONS OS benefit of first-line ICI-based combination therapy was seen in mRCC and mUC patients regardless of sex. Sex-based recommendations for ICI-based regimens according to the clinical setting may help guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Marcin Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Clinic of Urology and Urological Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Quhal F, Bryniarski P, Rivas JG, Gandaglia G, Shariat SF, Rajwa P. Salvage lymphadenectomy after primary therapy with curative intent for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:269-273. [PMID: 37166270 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide a summary of the current literature on salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in patients with nodal recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) with focus on imaging, the extent of sLND and oncologic outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS The clinical practice guidelines recommend performing PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary therapy. PSMA PET/CT has demonstrated superiority over choline PET/CT and MRI, especially at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Although the heterogeneity in available literature does not allow standardization of surgical templates for sLND and PET/CT scan can guide the extent of surgical dissection, an anatomically defined extended template is typically considered. Radio-guided surgery (RGS) suggests an improved positive lymph node yield compared with standard sLND. However, long-term data are needed to evaluate the oncologic impact of sLND. The main aims of sLND are to delay recurrence and to postpone the need for systemic therapy. Available evidence suggests that around 40-80% of men can achieve complete biochemical response after sLND and 10-30% remain BCR free after 5 years. Robotic sLND might represent an option to reduce the risk of complications without compromising oncological outcomes; validation in controlled prospective studies is, however, needed. SUMMARY sLND is a valid treatment option for patients with nodal recurrence only after primary therapy for PCa. Further optimization of patient selection based on highly sensitive and specific imaging and clinical factors remains an unmet need. To maximize the benefit of this approach, sLND should be discussed with patients who harbor lymph node-only recurrence after primary therapy in a shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Piotr Bryniarski
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Kawada T, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, Deimling MV, Chlosta M, Karakiewicz PI, Kimura T, Shariat SF. Neoadjuvant Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors before Radical Prostatectomy for Non-Metastatic Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040641. [PMID: 37109028 PMCID: PMC10142264 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Several phase II studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), assessed the efficacy of adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as a neoadjuvant treatment in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). Summarizing the early results of these studies could help in designing phase III trials and patient counseling. (2) Methods: We queried three databases in January 2023 for studies that included PCa patients treated with neoadjuvant ARSI-based combination therapy before RP. The outcomes of interest were oncologic outcomes and pathologic responses, such as pathologic complete response (pCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD). (3) Results: Overall, twenty studies (eight RCTs) were included in this systematic review. Compared to ADT or ARSI alone, ARSI + ADT was associated with higher pCR and MRD rates; this effect was less evident when adding a second ARSI or chemotherapy. Nevertheless, ARSI + ADT resulted in relatively low pCR rates (0-13%) with a high proportion of ypT3 (48-90%) in the resected specimen. PTEN loss, ERG positive, or intraductal carcinoma seem to be associated with worse pathologic response. One study that adjusted for the effects of possible confounders reported that neoadjuvant ARSI + ADT improved time to biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival compared to RP alone. (4) Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ARSI + ADT combination therapy results in improved pathologic response compared to either alone or none in patients with non-metastatic advanced PCa. Ongoing phase III RCTs with long-term oncologic outcomes, as well as biomarker-guided studies, will clarify the indication, oncologic benefits, and adverse events of ARSI + ADT in patients with clinically and biologically aggressive PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam 32253, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marcin Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Clinic of Urology and Urological Oncology, Jagiellonian University, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 43 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119435 Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman 19328, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rajwa P, Quhal F, D’Andrea D, Korn S, Petrov P, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Nyirády P, Abufaraj M, Marra G, Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Karakiewicz P, Ye DW, Haydter M, Chlosta P, Comperat E, Enikeev D, Shariat SF. Positive family history as a predictor for disease outcomes after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Arab J Urol 2023; 21:241-247. [PMID: 38178943 PMCID: PMC10763581 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2023.2196911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While family history (FHx) of prostate cancer (PCa) increases the risk of PCa, comparably less is known regarding the impact of FHx on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We retrospectively reviewed our multicenter database comprising 6,041 nonmetastatic PCa patients treated with RP. Patients with a FHx of PCa in one or more first-degree relatives were considered as FHx positive. We examined the association of FHx with pathologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. Results In total, 1,677 (28%) patients reported a FHx of PCa. Compared to patients without FHx, those with, were younger at RP (median age of 59 vs. 62 years, p < 0.01), and had significantlymore favorable biopsy and RP histopathologic findings. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, positive FHx was associated with extracapsular extension (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.90, p < 0.01; model AUC 0.73) and upgrading (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.80, p < 0.01; model AUC 0.68). Incorporating FHx significantly improved the AUC of the base model for upgrading (p < 0.01). Positive FHx was not associated with BCR in pre- and postoperative multivariable models (p = 0.1 and p = 0.7); c-indexes of Cox multivariable models were: 0.73 and 0.82, respectively. Conclusions We found that patients with clinically nonmetastatic PCa who have positive FHx of PCa undergo RP at a younger age and have more favorable pathologic outcomes. Nevertheless, FHx of PCa did not confer better BCR rates, suggesting that FHx leads to potentially early detection and treatment without impact on BCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - David D’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Korn
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrik Petrov
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Nyirády
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ding-wei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Martin Haydter
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Vienna, Austria
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Quhal F, Zeng G, Seitz C. Current evidence for suction in endourological procedures: comprehensive review of literature. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:77-83. [PMID: 36336907 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To identify the latest advances on the utilization of suctioning devices in the surgical treatment of urinary stones. RECENT FINDINGS Advances are being made to incorporate suction and pressure control capabilities in percutaneous and ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Multiple retrospective studies and few prospective studies have shown that suctioning with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy, commonly referred to as Super MiniPerc, can lead to better stone-free rates (SFR) and shorter operative time with lower incidence of infectious complications. Suctioning during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has mainly been achieved through suctioning ureteral access sheath. Here as well, the incorporation of suction improved the SFR, but most importantly, reduced the risk of postoperative infectious complications. SUMMARY Theoretically suction in endourological procedures could facilitate stone debris removal and could reduce intrarenal pressure at the same time allowing for increased irrigation flow potentially decreasing operation time and infectious complications. These claims are supported in contemporary clinical studies, reporting superior SFR and reduced postoperative infectious complications in both percutaneous nephrolithotomy and RIRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Guohua Zeng
- Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- European Urolithiasis Society (EULIS), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Laukhtina E, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Majdoub M, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Teoh JYC, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Shariat SF. Impact of Performance Status on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:264-274. [PMID: 36774273 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the management of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). However, its performance in aUC patients with poor performance status (PS) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the impact of patients' performance status on the oncologic outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception until July 2022 to identify studies assessing the association between the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS and the oncologic outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs in randomised (RCTs) and nonrandomised (NRCTs) control studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The outcomes of our interests were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, six RCTs comprising 5428 patients and 32 NRCTs comprising 6069 patients were included. The meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed that patients with ECOG PS = 0 and PS ≥1 had a trend towards better OS with ICIs compared with those treated with chemotherapy (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.04, and HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.53-1.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in terms of response to ICIs between patients with poor and good PS (I2 = 0%, p = 0.46). The meta-analysis of the NRCTs revealed that patients with PS ≥2 had significantly worse OS than those with PS <2 (pooled HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 2.00-3.17), as well as worse CSS (pooled HR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.90-5.91), PFS (pooled HR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.67-5.01), and ORR (pooled odds ratio: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27-0.82). Similarly, patients with PS ≥1 had significantly worse oncologic outcomes than those with PS = 0. CONCLUSIONS In the NRCTs, poor PS was correlated with worse oncologic outcomes in aUC patients treated with ICIs. In the RCTs, ICIs performed better than chemotherapy across all PS categories. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity across the studies and patient populations. More RCTs including poor PS are needed to assess the impact of PS on ICI therapy outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY Immune therapy for patients with urothelial carcinoma should not be restricted on the grounds of performance status. However, patients with poor performance status should be considered for other factors such as life expectancy and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Mohammed Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
von Deimling M, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Kawada T, Quhal F, Pallauf M, Bianchi A, Majdoub M, Mostafaei H, Motlagh R, Mori K, Enikeev D, Fisch M, Moschini M, D’Andrea D, Soria F, Albisinni S, Fajkovic H, Rink M, Teoh J, Gontero P, Shariat S. Functional outcomes in female patients after traditional, organ- and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: A systematic review and pooled analyses. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01045-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
22
|
Bianchi A, von Deimling M, Pallauf M, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Majdoub M, Motlagh RS, Pradere B, Karakiewicz PI, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Shariat SF. Perspectives on the future of urothelial carcinoma therapy: chemotherapy and beyond. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:177-195. [PMID: 36440477 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2150966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite recent developments in the landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment, platinum combination chemotherapy still remains a milestone. Recently immunotherapeutic agents have gained ever-growing attractivity, particularly in the metastatic setting. Novel chemotherapeutic strategies and agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and powerful combination regimens have been developed to overcome the resistance of most UC to current therapies. AREAS COVERED Herein, we review the current standard-of-care chemotherapy, the development of ADCs, the rationale for combining therapy regimens with chemotherapy in current trials, and future directions in UC management. EXPERT OPINION Immunotherapy has prompted a revolution in the treatment paradigm of UC. However, only a few patients experience a long-term response when treated with single-agent immunotherapies. Combination treatments are necessary to bypass resistance mechanisms and broaden the clinical utility of current options. Current evidence supports the intensification of standard-of-care chemotherapy with maintenance immunotherapy. However, the optimal sequence, combination, and duration must be determined to achieve individual longevity with acceptable health-related quality of life. In that regard, ADCs appear as a promising alternative for single and combination strategies in UC, as they specifically target the tumor cells, thereby, theoretically improving treatment efficacy and avoiding extensive off-target toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yanagiswawa T, Rajwa P, Kawada T, Mori K, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Majdoub M, Pradere B, Kramer G, Kimura T, Shariat S. Efficacy of systemic treatment in prostate cancer patients with visceral metastasis: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01234-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
24
|
Yanagisawa T, Quhal F, Kawada T, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Pallauf M, Majdoub M, Pradere B, Abufaraj M, Moschini M, Karakiewicz PI, Iwatani K, Miki J, Kimura T, Shariat SF. Oncological impact of cystoscopic findings in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2022; 131:643-659. [PMID: 36479820 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the association between cystoscopic findings and oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) given that the oncological impact of quantity and quality assessment of tumours with cystoscopy has not been well verified. METHODS Multiple databases were queried in May 2022 for studies investigating the association of oncological outcomes, such as recurrence-free (RFS), progression-free (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), with cystoscopic findings, including multiplicity, size, and gross appearance of tumours in patients with NMIBC. RESULTS Overall, 73 studies comprising 28 139 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Tumour multiplicity was associated with worse RFS (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-1.74) and PFS (pooled HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.18-1.76) in NMIBC patients (including both Ta and T1). Tumour size (≥3 cm) was associated with worse RFS (pooled HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.69-2.30) and PFS (pooled HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.52-2.15) in NMIBC patients. In patients with T1 bladder cancer (BCa), tumour multiplicity and size (≥3 cm) were also associated with worse RFS, PFS and CSS. By contrast, among patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), tumour multiplicity was not associated with worse RFS, and tumour size (≥3 cm) was not associated with worse PFS. Sessile tumours were associated with worse RFS (pooled HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.52-3.01) and PFS (pooled HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.42-3.32) compared to pedunculated tumours. Compared to papillary tumours, solid tumours were associated with worse RFS (pooled HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.25-2.72) and PFS (pooled HR 3.06, 95% CI 2.31-4.07) in NMIBC patients, and CSS in T1 BCa patients (pooled HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.63-3.30). CONCLUSIONS Cystoscopic findings, including tumour multiplicity, size, and gross appearance, strongly predict oncological outcomes in NMIBC patients. Cystoscopic visual features can help in the decision-making process regarding the timeliness and extent of tumour resection as well as future management such as intravesical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yanagisawa T, Quhal F, Kawada T, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Deimling MV, Bianchi A, Pallauf M, Majdoub M, Pradere B, Moschini M, Karakiewicz PI, Teoh JYC, Miki J, Kimura T, Shariat SF. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Chemoablation for Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2022:S2405-4569(22)00287-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
26
|
Laukhtina E, Hassler MR, Pradere B, Yanagisawa T, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Sari Motlagh R, König F, Pallauf M, Kawada T, Mostafaei H, D'Andrea D, Enikeev D, Shariat SF. Circulating Tumour DNA Is a Strong Predictor of Outcomes in Patients Treated with Systemic Therapy for Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1683-1686. [PMID: 35562252 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
We summarise the available data for and assess the prognostic value of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patients treated with systemic therapy for urothelial carcinoma (UC). Studies were deemed eligible if they reported on oncologic outcomes for patients with UC treated with systemic therapy according to the baseline ctDNA profile (before starting systemic therapy) and/or changes over the course of therapy. Five studies met the eligibility criteria. We found a strong association between high baseline ctDNA levels and worse disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.58-4.84) and overall survival (OS; HR 2.99, 95% CI 2.17-4.13). Patients with a decline in ctDNA level after immunotherapy had better DFS (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.49) and OS (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.42) in comparison to patients without a ctDNA decline. Conversely, an increase in ctDNA levels after immunotherapy was associated with worse survival outcomes. Patients with UC who exhibited a decrease in ctDNA levels during systemic therapy had better survival outcomes compared to those with stable or increasing ctDNA levels. PATIENT SUMMARY: Measurement of tumour DNA in blood may help in identifying patients with cancer of the urinary tract who are unlikely to respond to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. This could serve as a biomarker for monitoring cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Melanie R Hassler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kawada T, Laukhtina E, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Pallauf M, von Deimling M, Bianchi A, Pradere B, Fajkovic H, Enikeev D, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Araki M, Shariat SF. Oncologic and Safety Outcomes for Endoscopic Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 9:236-240. [PMID: 36463089 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
We systematically reviewed the literature and summarized oncologic and safety outcomes for endoscopic management (EM) compared to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Studies comparing oncologic and/or safety results for EM versus RNU in patients with UTUC were included in our review. Overall, 13 studies met the criteria, and five studies were included in a meta-analysis using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS). EM was associated similar OS (HR 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-2.16), CSS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.99-1.91), and BRFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.61-1.55) to RNU, while 28-85% of patients treated with EM experienced upper tract recurrence across the studies. EM required more interventions with a higher cumulative risk of complications and lower likelihood of renal preservation. In summary, EM for low-grade UTUC had comparable survival outcomes to RNU at the cost of higher local recurrence rates resulting in a need for long-term rigorous surveillance and repeated interventions. PATIENT SUMMARY: For selected cases of cancer in the upper urinary tract, surgical treatment via a telescope inserted through the urethra or the skin (endoscope) results in cancer control outcomes that are comparable to those after removal of the kidney and ureter. However, because of its higher rate of local recurrence, this approach requires repeated endoscopic treatment sessions. Patients should be well informed about these issues to help in shared decision-making.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Yanagisawa T, Katayama S, Pradere B, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, Quhal F, Moschini M, Soria F, Teoh JYC, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, Albisinni S, Krajewski W, Egawa S, Karakiewicz PI, Rink M, Shariat SF. Reassessment of the Efficacy of Carboplatin for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1687-1695. [PMID: 35279408 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (AMUC). However, data comparing the efficacy of different platinum agents are limited. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to assess the efficacy of carboplatin as a first-line treatment for AMUC using phase 3 randomized trial data. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Multiple databases were searched for articles published until August 2021. Studies that compared overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), and objective response rates (ORRs) in chemotherapy-eligible patients with AMUC were deemed eligible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Four studies were included. Compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, neither cisplatin- nor carboplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with significant OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-1.11, p = 0.64 and HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.78-1.04, p = 0.16, respectively) and CR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.70-1.92, p = 0.57 and OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.53, p = 0.67, respectively benefits, while both were associated with a favorable ORR (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, p < 0.001 and OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.80, p < 0.001, respectively). A network meta-analysis (NMA)-based indirect comparison between carboplatin and cisplatin revealed that while cisplatin was slightly better than carboplatin in terms of OS, CR, and ORR, no significant difference was noted. CONCLUSIONS Cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapies offer similar OS/CR benefits to ICI monotherapy and elicit a greater ORR than ICI monotherapy. Moreover, our NMA demonstrated that both cisplatin- and carboplatin-based chemotherapy have a similar efficacy in terms of OS, CR, and ORR. Given that carboplatin-based chemotherapy is shown to be more effective in contemporary series than in historical controls, it is strongly recommended that carboplatin be re-examined for its value in the era of ICIs and beyond. PATIENT SUMMARY Cisplatin- as well as carboplatin-based chemotherapy is as effective as immune checkpoint inhibitors in terms of survival and eliciting a positive response. It is currently believed that cisplatin provides greater benefits than carboplatin; this requires re-evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, von Deimling M, Pallauf M, Bianchi A, Majdoub M, Enikeev D, Fajkovic H, Teoh JYC, Rouprêt M, Gontero P, Shariat SF. Oncologic and Safety Outcomes for Retrograde and Antegrade Endoscopic Surgeries for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 9:258-263. [PMID: 36428210 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify and summarize available data on oncologic and safety outcomes for retrograde versus antegrade endoscopic surgery in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We systematically searched studies reporting on endoscopic surgery in patients with UTUC. The primary outcome of interest was oncologic control, including bladder and upper urinary tract recurrences. The secondary outcomes were any-grade and major complications. Twenty studies comprising 1091 patients were included in our analysis. The pooled bladder recurrence rate was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.0-42.3%; I2 = 48%) after retrograde endoscopic surgery and 17.7% (95% CI 6.5-32.1%; I2 = 29%) after antegrade endoscopic surgery. The pooled upper urinary tract recurrence rate was 56.4% (95% CI 41.2-70.9; I2 = 93%) after retrograde endoscopic surgery and 36.2% (95% CI 25.5-47.6%; I2 = 57%) after antegrade endoscopic surgery. The pooled complication rate was 12.5% (95% CI 0.8-32.8%; I2 = 94%) for any-grade complications and 6.6% (95% CI 0.1-19.1%; I2 = 89%) for major complications in the retrograde endoscopic cohort. In summary, our analyses suggest promising oncologic benefits of antegrade kidney-sparing surgery in terms of bladder and upper urinary tract recurrence rates in UTUC. Retrograde endoscopic surgery is a safe procedure with a minimal risk of complications and acceptable oncologic outcomes. Research should address the hypothesis that endoscopic antegrade surgery can be a safe and effective alternative for well-selected patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: One of the surgical options for treatment of cancer of the upper urinary tract is removal of the tumor through a small telescope called an endoscope. The endoscope can be inserted via the urethra (called a retrograde approach) or through a small incision in the skin (antegrade approach). Our review shows that the antegrade approach seems to provide acceptable cancer control rates. Further research could help to identify the role for endoscope surgery in cancer of the upper urinary tract.
Collapse
|
30
|
Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Quhal F, Kawada T, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Sari Motlagh R, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Miki J, Kimura T, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Iatrogenic Ureteral Injury During Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery: A Meta-analysis. BJU Int 2022; 131:540-552. [PMID: 36196670 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the incidence of ureteral injuries, clinical value of prophylactic ureteral stenting, and impact of intraoperative or postoperative detection of ureteral injuries in patients treated with gynecological or colorectal surgery. METHODS Multiple databases were searched for articles published before September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated the differences in the rate of ureteral injuries between laparoscopic and open surgery, prophylactic ureteral stenting or not, and those of final treatment success between intraoperative and postoperative detection in patients who underwent gynecological or colorectal surgery. RESULTS Overall, 46 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of ureteral injuries (pooled odds ratio [OR]; 2.12, 95% confidence intervals [CI]; 1.71-2.62), but there was no statistically significant difference in colectomy (pooled OR; 0.89, 95% CI; 0.77-1.03). Prophylactic ureteral stenting was associated with a lower incidence of ureteral injuries during gynecological surgery (pooled OR; 0.61, 95%CI; 0.39-0.96). The number needed to perform ureteral stenting to prevent one ureteral injury was 224 in gynecological surgery. On the other hand, prophylactic ureteral stenting did not reduce the risk of ureteral injuries during colorectal surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteral injury was associated with a lower rate of complication management failure compared to postoperative detection (pooled OR; 0.22, 95%CI; 0.12-0.41). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic hysterectomy seems to be associated with a higher rate of ureteral injuries compared to an open approach. Prophylactic ureteral stenting seems to reduce this risk during gynecological surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteral injury during abdominal/pelvic surgery improves outcomes, suggesting the need for awareness and proactive problem identification. Further well-designed studies assessing the candidates who are more likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteral stenting including cost analysis are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Thibault C, Gandaglia G, Mori K, Kawada T, Fukuokaya W, Shim SR, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Kimura T, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Addition to Docetaxel with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2022; 82:584-598. [PMID: 35995644 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the role of adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), including abiraterone acetate (ABI), apalutamide, darolutamide (DAR), and enzalutamide (ENZ), to docetaxel (DOC) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). OBJECTIVE To analyze the oncologic benefit of triplet combination therapies using ARSI + DOC + ADT, and comparing them with available treatment regimens in patients with mHSPC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases and meetings abstracts were queried in April 2022 for RCTs analyzing patients treated with first-line combination systemic therapy for mHSPC. The primary interests of measure were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the differential outcomes in patients with low- and high-volume disease as well as de novo and metachronous metastasis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 11 RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). We found that the triplet combinations outperformed DOC + ADT in terms of OS (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.84) and PFS (pooled HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.42-0.58). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with low- and high-volume disease in terms of an OS benefit from adding an ARSI to DOC +ADT (both HR: 0.79; p = 1). Based on NMAs, triplet therapy also outperformed ARSI + ADT in terms of OS (DAR + DOC + ADT: pooled HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and PFS (ABI + DOC + ADT: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.91, and ENZ + DOC + ADT: HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.93). An analysis of treatment ranking among de novo mHSPC patients showed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with high-volume disease; however, doublet therapy using ARSI + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with low-volume disease. CONCLUSIONS We found that the triplet combination therapy improves survival endpoints in mHSPC patients compared with currently available doublet treatment regimens. Our findings need to be confirmed in further head-to-head trials with longer follow-up and among various patient populations. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study suggests that triplet therapy with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, docetaxel, androgen deprivation therapy prolongs survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer compared with the current standard doublet therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Health and Medical Informatics, Kyungnam University College of Health Sciences, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mori K, Yanagisawa T, Katayama S, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Moschini M, Soria F, D'andrea D, Abufaraj M, Albisinni S, Krajewski W, Fukuokaya W, Miki J, Kimura T, Egawa S, Teoh JY, Shariat SF. Impact of sex on outcomes after surgery for non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2022; 41:909-919. [PMID: 35963957 PMCID: PMC10159976 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04116-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the prognostic value of sex for non-muscle-invasive/muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (NMIBC/MIBC) treated with radical surgery. METHODS The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they involved the comparison of the overall, cancer-specific, progression, and recurrence-free survival of patients with NMIBC/MIBC. Formal sex-stratified meta-analyses of these outcomes were performed. RESULTS Thirty-one studies, which included 32,525 patients with NMIBC, and 63 studies, which included 85,132 patients with MIBC, were eligible for review and meta-analysis. Female sex was associated with worse cancer-specific survival (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.31) and overall survival (pooled HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05) in patients with MIBC. In contrast, however, sex was not associated with cancer-specific survival (pooled HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.46), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.24), and recurrence-free survival (pooled HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.16) in patients with NMIBC. CONCLUSIONS Sex is associated with an increased risk of worse survival outcomes in patients with MIBC but not in those with NMIBC. Given the genetic and social differences between sexes, sex may represent a key factor in the clinical decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - David D'andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jeremy Yc Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. .,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. .,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. .,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. .,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. .,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Rajwa P, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Karakiewicz PI, Nyirady P, Kimura T, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Sequencing impact and prognostic factors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with cabazitaxel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 41:177-191. [PMID: 35970698 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cabazitaxel is an effective treatment of post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to assess the sequencing impact and identify prognostic factors of oncologic outcomes in mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel. METHODS PUBMED, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published before January 2022 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they investigated pretreatment clinical or hematological prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients with progression after docetaxel treated with available treatments including cabazitaxel. RESULTS Overall, 22 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. In mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel, subsequent treatment with cabazitaxel was associated with better OS compared to that without cabazitaxel (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.89). Among the patients treated with cabazitaxel, several pretreatment clinical features and hematologic biomarkers were associated with worse OS as follows: poor performance status (PS) (pooled HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.33-2.77), presence of visceral metastasis (pooled HR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.62-2.81), symptomatic disease (pooled HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.25-1.73), high PSA (pooled HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.27-2.44), high alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (pooled HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.28-1.65), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (pooled HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.00-2.38), high c-reactive protein (CRP) (pooled HR: 4.40, 95% CI: 1.52-12.72), low albumin (pooled HR:1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12) and low hemoglobin (pooled HR:1.55, 95% CI: 1.20-1.99). CONCLUSIONS Sequential therapy with cabazitaxel significantly improves OS in post-docetaxel mCRPC patients. In mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel, patients with poor PS, visceral metastasis, and symptomatic disease were associated with worse OS. Further, pretreatment high PSA, ALP, LDH or CRP as well as low hemoglobin or albumin, were blood-based prognostic factors for OS. These findings might help guide the clinical decision-making for the use of cabazitaxel and prognostication of its OS benefit.
Collapse
|
34
|
Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Kawada T, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Miki J, Kimura T, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Differential efficacy of ablation therapy versus partial nephrectomy between clinical T1a and T1b renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:315-330. [PMID: 35562311 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the differential clinical outcomes of patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. those treated with ablation therapy (AT) such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and microwave ablation for cT1b compared to cT1a renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multiple databases were searched for articles published before August 2021. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PN with those who underwent AT for cT1a and/or cT1b renal tumors. RESULTS Overall, 27 studies comprising 13,996 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. In both cT1a and cT1b renal tumors, there was no significant difference in the percent decline of estimated glomerular filtration rates or in the overall/severe complication rates between PN and AT. Compared to AT, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence in both patients with cT1a and cT1b tumors (cT1a: pooled risk ratio [RR]; 0.43, 95% confidence intervals [CI]; 0.28-0.66, cT1b: pooled RR; 0.41, 95%CI; 0.23-0.75). Subgroup analyses regarding the technical approach revealed no statistical difference in local recurrence rates between percutaneous AT and PN in patients with cT1a tumors (pooled RR; 0.61, 95%CI; 0.32-1.15). In cT1b, however, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence (pooled RR; 0.45, 95%CI; 0.23-0.88). There was no difference in distant metastasis or cancer mortality rates between PN and AT in patients with cT1a, or cT1b tumors. CONCLUSIONS AT has a substantially relevant disadvantage with regards to local recurrence compared to PN, particularly in cT1b renal tumors. Despite the limitations inherent to the nature of retrospective and unmatched primary cohorts, percutaneous AT could be used as a reasonable alternative treatment for well-selected patients with cT1a renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pallauf M, König F, D’Andrea D, Laukhtina E, Mostafaei H, Motlagh RS, Quhal F, Aydh A, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Rajwa P, Lusuardi L, Soria F, Karakiewicz PI, Rouprêt M, Rink M, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Singla N, Xylinas E, Shariat SF, Pradere B. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Nomograms After UTUC Surgery. Front Oncol 2022; 12:907975. [PMID: 35847838 PMCID: PMC9283688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.907975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current guidelines recommend assessing the prognosis in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients (UTUC) after surgery. However, no specific method is endorsed. Among the various prognostic models, nomograms represent an easy and accurate tool to predict the individual probability for a specific event. Therefore, identifying the best-suited nomogram for each setting seems of great interest to the patient and provider. Objectives To identify, summarize and compare postoperative UTUC nomograms predicting oncologic outcomes. To estimate the overall performance of the nomograms and identify the most reliable predictors. To create a reference tool for postoperative UTUC nomograms, physicians can use in clinical practice. Design A systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane’s Prognosis Methods Group. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for studies published before December 2021. Nomograms were grouped according to outcome measurements, the purpose of use, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate nomogram group performance and predictor reliability. Reference tables summarizing the nomograms’ important characteristics were created. Results The systematic review identified 26 nomograms. Only four were externally validated. Study heterogeneity was significant, and the overall Risk of Bias (RoB) was high. Nomogram groups predicting overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and intravesical recurrence (IVR) had moderate discrimination accuracy (c-Index summary estimate with 95% confidence interval [95% CI] and prediction interval [PI] > 0.6). Nomogram groups predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) had good discrimination accuracy (c-Index summary estimate with 95% CI and PI > 0.7). Advanced pathological tumor stage (≥ pT3) was the most reliable predictor of OS. Pathological tumor stage (≥ pT2), age, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were the most reliable predictors of CSS. LVI was the most reliable predictor of RFS. Conclusions Despite a moderate to good discrimination accuracy, severe heterogeneity discourages the uninformed use of postoperative prognostic UTUC nomograms. For nomograms to become of value in a generalizable population, future research must invest in external validation and assessment of clinical utility. Meanwhile, this systematic review serves as a reference tool for physicians choosing nomograms based on individual needs. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=282596, identifier PROSPERO [CRD42021282596].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
- Karl Landsteiner Insitute of Urology and Andrology, Karl Landsteiner Society, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
- *Correspondence: Benjamin Pradere,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Laukhtina E, Boehm A, Peyronnet B, Bravi CA, Batista Da Costa J, Soria F, D'Andrea D, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, König F, Mostafaei H, Enikeev D, Ingels A, Verhoest G, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, de la Taille A, Bensalah K, Bruyère F, Shariat SF, Pradere B. Urethrectomy at the time of radical cystectomy for non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a collaborative multicenter study. World J Urol 2022; 40:1689-1696. [PMID: 35596017 PMCID: PMC9236994 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04025-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal management of the urethra in patients planned for radical cystectomy (RC) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the impact of urethrectomy on perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients treated with RC for non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed the retrospective data from patients treated with RC for UCB of five European University Hospitals. Associations of urethrectomy with progression-free (PFS), cancer-free (CSS), and overall (OS) survivals were assessed in univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients at high risk for urethral recurrence (UR) (urethral invasion and/or bladder neck invasion and/or multifocality and/or prostatic urethra involvement). RESULTS A total of 887 non-metastatic UCB patients were included. Among them, 146 patients underwent urethrectomy at the time of RC. Urethrectomy was performed more often in patients with urethral invasion, T3/4 tumor stage, CIS, positive frozen section analysis of the urethra, and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent robotic RC, and/or received an ileal conduit urinary diversion (all p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss and the postoperative complication rate were comparable between patients who received an urethrectomy and those who did not. Urethrectomy during RC was not associated with PFS (HR 0.83, p = 0.17), CSS (HR 0.93, p = 0.67), or OS (HR 1.08, p = 0.58). In the subgroup of 276 patients at high risk for UR, urethrectomy at the time of RC decreased the risk of progression (HR 0.58, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION In our study, urethrectomy at the time of RC seems to benefit only patients at high risk for UR. Adequate risk assessment of UCB patients' history may allow for better clinical decision-making and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Axelle Boehm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Jose Batista Da Costa
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, UPEC, AP-HP, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 95010, Créteil Cedex, France
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, UPEC, AP-HP, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 95010, Créteil Cedex, France
| | - Gregory Verhoest
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alexandre de la Taille
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, UPEC, AP-HP, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 95010, Créteil Cedex, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Franck Bruyère
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. .,Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Ceci F, Baltzer PAT, Hacker M, Rasul S, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:390-400. [PMID: 35715320 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has gained acceptance as a staging tool for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent reports suggest an association between PSMA PET and detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) on prostate biopsy. OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET-targeted biopsy (PSMA-PET-TB) for csPCa detection. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in December 2021 to identify studies assessing the accuracy of PSMA-PET-TB for csPCa detection. A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA-PET-TB alone and in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TB for detecting csPCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, five prospective studies involving 497 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. For csPCa detection, PSMA-PET-TB had pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.93), 0.56 (95% CI 0.29-0.80), 0.69 (95% CI 0.58-0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI 0.50-0.93), respectively. Among the three studies assessing the PSMA-PET + MRI-TB strategy, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for csPCa detection were 0.91 (95% CI 0.77-0.97), 0.64 (95% CI 0.40-0.82), 0.75 (95% CI 0.56-0.87), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.62-0.95), respectively. For lesions with a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.69, 0.73, 0.48, and 0.86, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET-TB appears to have favorable diagnostic accuracy for csPCa detection and combination with MRI seems to improve this. According to our meta-analysis, PSMA-PET has promising clinical application for detection of csPCa, namely in the case of PI-RADS 3 lesions. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the true clinical utility of a PSMA-PET-based diagnostic pathway. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is a promising imaging method for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and seems to have additional value to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Katayama S, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Teoh JYC, Resch I, Fajkovic H, Moschini M, D'andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Lotan Y, Scherr D, Egawa S, Compérat E, Shariat SF. ASO Visual Abstract: Prognostic Role of Preoperative Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Plasma Levels in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Treated with Radical Cystectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [PMID: 35532830 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11742-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Jeremy Y C Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - David D'andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Douglas Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. .,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. .,Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. .,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA. .,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. .,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mori K, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, Katayama S, Pradere B, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, Kimura T, Egawa S, Bensalah K, Karakiewicz P, Schmidinger M, Shariat S. MP12-13 THE ROLE OF NEPHRECTOMY IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN THE ERA OF IMMUNE-COMBINATION THERAPIES: A META-ANALYSIS. J Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002534.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
40
|
Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Katayama S, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Motlagh RS, Aydh A, König F, Grossmann NC, Pradere B, Miki J, Schmidinger M, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Hematological prognosticators in metastatic renal cell cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Immunotherapy 2022; 14:709-725. [DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment hematological biomarkers in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Results: Fifteen studies comprising 1530 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. High levels of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase were significantly associated with worse progression-free survival. High NLR and PLR were significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion: High pretreatment NLR and PLR appear to be hematological prognostic factors of progression and overall mortality in mRCC patients treated with ICIs. These findings might help in the design of correlative biomarker studies to guide the clinical decision-making in the immune checkpoint inhibitor era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo105-8461, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo105-8461, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, 32253, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology & Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, 41-808, Poland
| | - Reza S Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Men's Health & Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Iran
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, 614312, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20251, Germany
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, 6004, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo105-8461, Japan
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo105-8461, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology & Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, 119991, Russia
- Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, 19328, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, 11638, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sari Motlagh R, Schuettfort VM, Mori K, Katayama S, Rajwa P, Aydh A, Grossmann NC, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Mostafai H, Quhal F, Abufaraj M, Lee R, Karakiewicz PI, Lotan Y, Comprate E, Moschini M, Gontero P, Shariat SF. Prognostic impact of insulin‐like growth factor‐I and its binding proteins, insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐2 and ‐3, on adverse histopathological features and survival outcomes after radical cystectomy. Int J Urol 2022; 29:676-683. [PMID: 35368130 PMCID: PMC9543826 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Insulin‐like growth factor‐I and its binding proteins are involved in cancer development, progression, and metastasis. In urothelial carcinoma, the impact of this pathway is still poorly investigated. The present large cohort study aimed to evaluate the association of preoperative circulating levels of insulin‐like growth factor‐I, insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐2 and ‐3 on outcomes after radical cystectomy. Methods A retrospective cohort study of the plasma specimens from 1036 consecutive urothelial carcinoma patients who were treated with radical cystectomy. The primary and secondary outcomes were adverse histopathological features and survival outcomes. Binominal logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association of plasma levels of insulin‐like growth factor‐I, insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐2 and ‐3 with outcomes. Results On multivariable analysis adjusting for the effects of preoperative variables, lower insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐2 levels were associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastasis and (any non‐organ confined disease) any non‐organ confined disease. Insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐3 levels were also inversely independently associated with lymph node metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the addition of insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding proteins biomarkers to a reference model significantly improved the discriminating ability for the prediction of lymph node metastasis (+10.0%, P < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression models, lower levels of both insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐2 and ‐3 plasma levels were associated with recurrence‐free survival, cancer‐specific survival, and overall survival. insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐2 and ‐3 levels and improved the discrimination of a standard reference model for the prediction of recurrence‐free survival, cancer‐specific survival, and overall survival (+4.9%, 4.9%, 2.3%, respectively). Conclusions Preoperative insulin‐like growth factor‐I binding protein‐2 and ‐3 are significantly associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive urothelial carcinoma. These biomarkers improved prognostic urothelial carcinoma models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Department of Urology King Faisal Medical City Abha Saudi Arabia
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Department of Urology University Hospital Zurich Zurich Switzerland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafai
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
| | - Richard Lee
- Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit University of Montreal Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
| | - Eva Comprate
- Department of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Milan Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital University of Torino School of Medicine Torino Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
- Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
König F, Pradere B, Grossmann NC, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Laukhtina E, Mori K, Katayama S, Yanagisawa T, Mostafai H, Motlagh RS, Aydh A, Dahlem R, Shariat SF, Rink M. Quality indicators for the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the perioperative setting of radical cystectomy: a narrative review. Transl Cancer Res 2022; 11:908-917. [PMID: 35571640 PMCID: PMC9091037 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-21-1116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nico C. Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafai
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Roland Dahlem
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Aydh A, Motlagh RS, Abufaraj M, Mori K, Katayama S, Grossmann N, Rajawa P, Mostafai H, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Quhal F, Schuettfort VM, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF. Radiation therapy compared to radical prostatectomy as first-line definitive therapy for patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Urol 2022; 20:71-80. [PMID: 35530569 PMCID: PMC9067961 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2022.2026010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To present an update of the available literature on external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without brachytherapy (BT) compared to radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer (PCa). Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature assessing the survival outcomes in patients with high-risk PCa who received EBRT with or without BT compared to RP as the first-line therapy with curative intent. We queried PubMed and Web of Science database in January 2021. Moreover, we used random or fixed-effects meta-analytical models in the presence or absence of heterogeneity per the I2 statistic, respectively. We performed six meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results A total of 27 studies were selected with 23 studies being eligible for both OS and CSS. EBRT alone had a significantly worse OS and CSS compared to RP (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–1.65; and HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.25–1.93). However, there was no difference in OS (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.76–1.34) and CSS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45–1.06) between EBRT plus BT compared to RP. Conclusion While cancer control affected by EBRT alone seems inferior to RP in patients with high-risk PCa, BT additive to EBRT was not different from RP. These data support the need for BT in addition to EBRT as part of multimodal RT for high-risk PCa. Abbreviations: ADT: androgen-deprivation therapy; BT: brachytherapy; CSS: cancer-specific survival; HR: hazard ratio; MFS, metastatic-free survival; MOOSE: Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology; OR: odds ratio; OS: overall survival; PCa: prostate cancer; RR: relative risk; RP: radical prostatectomy; RCT: randomised controlled trials; (EB)RT: (external beam) radiation therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- The National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Nico Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Hadi Mostafai
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Victor M. Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Haron Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Katayama S, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Teoh JY, Resch I, Fajkovic H, Moschini M, D'andrea D, Abufaraj M, Karakiewicz PI, Lotan Y, Scherr D, Egawa S, Compérat E, Shariat SF. Prognostic Role of Preoperative Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Plasma Levels in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Treated With Radical Cystectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5307-5316. [PMID: 35347517 PMCID: PMC9246812 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11575-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Angiogenesis-related marker vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) has been shown to be elevated in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), but its predictive/prognostic role has not been determined. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the predictive/prognostic role of VCAM-1 for patients who have UCB treated with radical cystectomy (RC).
Methods
The study enrolled 1036 patients with clinically non-metastatic advanced UCB who underwent RC, and plasma VCAM-1 was evaluated preoperatively. The correlation of plasma VCAM-1 with pathologic and survival outcomes was assessed using binominal logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the curve and concordance indices. The clinical net benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results
Preoperative VCAM-1 was significantly elevated in patients with adverse pathologic features. Higher VCAM-1 levels were independently associated with increased risk of lymph-node-metastasis (LNM), ≥pT3 disease, and non-organ-confined disease (NOCD (p < 0.001 for each). Preoperative plasma VCAM-1 was independently associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in pre- and postoperative multivariable models. Adding VCAM-1 to these predictive models improved their discriminatory ability to predict all outcomes by a significant margin. In the DCA, VCAM-1 addition to the reference models for prediction of LNM, NOCD, RFS, and CSS resulted in relevant improvement.
Conclusions
Elevated plasma VCAM-1 was associated with biologically and clinically aggressive UCB disease features. After validation, preoperative VCAM-1 may serve as a biomarker to help identify patients likely to benefit from intensified/multimodal therapy. In addition, VCAM-1 improved the discriminatory power of predictive/prognostic models and can be used to refine personalized clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
- Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Jeremy Yc Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - David D'andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Douglas Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mori K, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, Katayama S, Pradere B, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Mostafaei H, Sari Motlagh R, Kimura T, Egawa S, Bensalah K, Karakiewicz PI, Schmidinger M, Shariat SF. The effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with and without previous cytoreductive nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 108:108720. [PMID: 35339843 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-combination therapies have radically altered the treatment landscape in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). No phase 3 trials have assessed the impact of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for efficacy in mRCC patients treated with ICI-combination therapy. We aimed to assess the role of ICI-combination therapy based on CN status. METHODS Multiple databases were searched for articles published until June 2021. Studies comparing overall and/or progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in mRCC patients treated with ICI combination-therapy were deemed eligible. RESULTS Six studies met the eligibility criteria. ICI-combination therapy was associated with significantly better OS/PFS than sunitinib in patients who had undergone CN (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.77/HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.74, respectively; both P < 0.001), and in those who had not (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.85/HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.77, respectively; both P < 0.001). Although the OS and PFS benefits of ICI-combination therapy were larger in those undergoing CN, the HR for OS and PFS indicated that ICI-combination therapy's treatment effect did not differ substantially with or without CN. In network meta-analyses, nivolumab plus cabozantinib was the most effective regimen in those undergoing CN, and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for those not undergoing CN. CONCLUSION The effect of ICI combination therapy did not differ between mRCC patients undergoing and not undergoing CN. As each ICI combination regimen varied widely in its effect in patients undergoing and not undergoing CN, CN may contribute to better treatment decision-making for ICI-combination therapy recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, D'Andrea D, Pradere B, Quhal F, Mori K, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Katayama S, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Karakiewicz PI, Schmidinger M, Fajkovic H, Enikeev D, Shariat SF. Selection and evaluation of preoperative systemic inflammatory response biomarkers model prior to cytoreductive nephrectomy using a machine-learning approach. World J Urol 2022; 40:747-754. [PMID: 34671856 PMCID: PMC8948147 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03844-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of a panel of SIR-biomarkers, relative to standard clinicopathological variables, to improve mRCC patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). MATERIAL AND METHODS A panel of preoperative SIR-biomarkers, including the albumin-globulin ratio (AGR), De Ritis ratio (DRR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), was assessed in 613 patients treated with CN for mRCC. Patients were randomly divided into training and testing cohorts (65/35%). A machine learning-based variable selection approach (LASSO regression) was used for the fitting of the most informative, yet parsimonious multivariable models with respect to prognosis of cancer-specific survival (CSS). The discriminatory ability of the model was quantified using the C-index. After validation and calibration of the model, a nomogram was created, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical net benefit. RESULTS SIR-biomarkers were selected by the machine-learning process to be of high discriminatory power during the fitting of the model. Low AGR remained significantly associated with CSS in both training (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.82, p = 0.01) and testing (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.26-2.51, p = 0.01) cohorts. High levels of SII (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.10-2.08, p = 0.01) and DRR (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96, p = 0.04) were associated with CSS only in the testing cohort. The exclusion of the SIR-biomarkers for the prognosis of CSS did not result in a significant decrease in C-index (- 0.9%) for the training cohort, while the exclusion of SIR-biomarkers led to a reduction in C-index in the testing cohort (- 5.8%). However, SIR-biomarkers only marginally increased the discriminatory ability of the respective model in comparison to the standard model. CONCLUSION Despite the high discriminatory ability during the fitting of the model with machine-learning approach, the panel of readily available blood-based SIR-biomarkers failed to add a clinical benefit beyond the standard model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Manuela Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Katayama S, Mori K, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Schuettfort VM, Quhal F, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Aydh A, König F, Mathieu R, Nyirady P, Karakiewicz PI, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Comparison of short-term and long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:85-93. [PMID: 35142251 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2034941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of long-term neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS We conducted meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, which included randomized controlled trials that assessed patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received either short-term (<6 months) or long-term (≥6 months) neoadjuvant ADT before RP. RESULTS Thirteen articles with 2778 patients were eligible for analysis. Short-term neoadjuvant ADT was neither associated with biochemical recurrence (OR 1.19, 95% CI, 0.93-1.51, p = 0.17), metastasis (OR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.45-1.19, p = 0.21), nor overall mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.21, p = 0.22); no study investigated survival outcomes in patients on long-term neoadjuvant ADT. In terms of pathologic outcomes, long-term neoadjuvant ADT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of positive surgical margin (SM) and an increased rate of organ-confined disease (OCD) compared to short-term neoadjuvant ADT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80, p = 0.001, and OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99, p = 0.009, respectively). These findings were confirmed in the network meta-analyses. Meanwhile, only a non-significant trend favoring long-term neoadjuvant ADT was observed for pathologic complete response (OR 1.98, 95% Crl 1.00-3.93). CONCLUSION Long-term neoadjuvant ADT was associated with more favorable pathologic outcomes, but whether these findings translate into favorable survival outcomes still remains unproven due to very limited evidence. Since there are no reliable survival data, long-term neoadjuvant ADT before RP should not be used in clinical practice until more robust evidence arises from ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Peter Nyirady
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sari Motlagh R, Schuettfort V, Mori K, Katayama S, Rajwa P, Aydh A, Grossmann N, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Mostafai H, Quhal F, Abufaraj M, Lee R, Karakiewicz P, Lotan Y, Comprate E, Moschini M, Gontero P, Shariat S. Prognostic impact of perioperative circulating levels of Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and its binding proteins, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3, on disease outcomes after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(22)01159-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
49
|
Laukhtina E, Quhal F, Mori K, Sari Motlagh R, Katayama S, Rajwa P, Yanagisawa T, Grossmann N, Mostafaei H, König F, Aydh A, Pradere B, Teoh J, Enikeev D, Karakiewicz P, Schmidinger M, Shariat S. Pembrolizumab outperforms tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the adjuvant therapy of patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(22)01083-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
50
|
Yanagiswawa T, Mori K, Kawada T, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Miki J, Kimura T, Egawa S, Shariat S. Can ablation therapy be an alternative treatment to partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b renal tumors?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(22)00300-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|