1
|
Schroeck FR, Grubb R, MacKenzie TA, Ould Ismail AA, Jensen L, Tsongalis GJ, Lotan Y. Clinical Trial Protocol for "Replace Cysto": Replacing Invasive Cystoscopy with Urine Testing for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Surveillance-A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 Healthcare Delivery Trial Comparing Quality of Life During Cancer Surveillance with Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor or Bladder EpiCheck Urine Testing Versus Frequent Cystoscopy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 63:19-30. [PMID: 38558761 PMCID: PMC10981003 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
"Replace Cysto" is a multisite randomized phase 2 trial including 240 participants with low-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, in which participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to one of two urine marker-based approaches alternating a urine marker test (Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor or Bladder EpiCheck) with cystoscopy or to frequent scheduled cystoscopy. The primary objective is to determine whether urinary quality of life after surveillance is significantly improved in the urine marker arms. The primary outcome will be the patient-reported urinary quality of life domain score of the validated QLQ-NMIBC24 instrument, measured 1-3 d after surveillance. Exploratory outcomes include discomfort after surveillance, the number of invasive procedures that participants undergo per 1000 person years, complications from these procedures per 1000 person years, nonurinary quality of life, acceptability of surveillance, and bladder cancer recurrence and progression. Comparators include surveillance using (1) the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor test, (2) the Bladder EpiCheck urinary marker, or (3) frequent cystoscopy alone. After a negative cystoscopy ≤4 mo following bladder tumor resection, all the participants will undergo surveillance at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo (with time zero defined as the date of the most recent bladder tumor resection). In the urine marker arms, surveillance at 6 and 18 mo will be performed with the marker. Regardless of the arm, participants will undergo cystoscopy at 12 and 24 mo. End of study for each participant will be their 24-mo cystoscopy. Overall trial duration is estimated at 5 yr from when the study opens to enrollment until completion of data analyses. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05796375).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian R. Schroeck
- White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA
- Section of Urology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Robert Grubb
- Department of Urology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Todd A. MacKenzie
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | - Laura Jensen
- White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA
| | - Gregory J. Tsongalis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gore JL, Follmer K, Reynolds J, Nash M, Anderson CB, Catto JWF, Chamie K, Daneshmand S, Dickstein R, Garg T, Gilbert SM, Guzzo TJ, Kamat AM, Kates MR, Lane BR, Lotan Y, Mansour AM, Master VA, Montgomery JS, Morris DS, Nepple KG, O'Neil BB, Patel S, Pohar K, Porten SP, Riggs SB, Sankin A, Scarpato KR, Shore ND, Steinberg GD, Strope SA, Taylor JM, Comstock BA, Kessler LG, Wolff EM, Smith AB. Interruptions in bladder cancer care during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:116.e17-116.e21. [PMID: 38087711 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Academic and community urology centers participating in a pragmatic clinical trial in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer completed monthly surveys assessing restrictions in aspects of bladder cancer care due to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Our objective was to describe pandemic-related restrictions on bladder cancer care. METHODS We invited 32 sites participating in a multicenter pragmatic bladder cancer trial to complete monthly surveys distributed through REDCap beginning in May 2020. These surveys queried sites on whether they were experiencing restrictions in the use of elective surgery, transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), radical cystectomy, office cystoscopy, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) availability. Responses were collated with descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of 32 eligible sites, 21 sites had at least a 50% monthly response rate over the study period and were included in the analysis. Elective surgery was paused at 76% of sites in May 2020, 48% of sites in January 2021, and 52% of sites in January 2022. Over those same periods, coinciding with COVID-19 incidence waves, TURBT was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 14% of sites, respectively, radical cystectomy was restricted at 10%, 14%, and 19% of sites, respectively, and cystoscopy was restricted at 33%, 0%, and 10% of sites, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Bladder cancer care was minimally restricted compared with more pronounced restrictions seen in general elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | - Kristin Follmer
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jason Reynolds
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael Nash
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - James W F Catto
- Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS (National Health Service) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rian Dickstein
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, MD; Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tullika Garg
- Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa FL
| | - Thomas J Guzzo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Max R Kates
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brian R Lane
- Division of Urology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ahmed M Mansour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Brock B O'Neil
- Division of Urology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Sanjay Patel
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Kamal Pohar
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Stephen B Riggs
- Department of Urology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | | | - Kristen R Scarpato
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Jennifer M Taylor
- Michael E. DeBakey VAMC, Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Bryan A Comstock
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Larry G Kessler
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ladi-Seyedian SS, Ghoreifi A, Konety B, Pohar K, Holzbeierlein JM, Taylor J, Kates M, Willard B, Taylor JM, Liao JC, Kaimakliotis HZ, Porten SP, Steinberg GD, Tyson MD, Lotan Y, Daneshmand S. Racial Differences in the Detection Rate of Bladder Cancer Using Blue Light Cystoscopy: Insights from a Multicenter Registry. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1268. [PMID: 38610946 PMCID: PMC11011163 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of blue light cystoscopy (BLC) has been shown to improve bladder tumor detection. However, data demonstrating the efficacy of BLC across different races are limited. Herein, we aim to evaluate heterogeneity in the characteristics of BLC for the detection of malignant lesions among various races. Clinicopathologic information was collected from patients enrolled in the multi-institutional Cysview® registry (2014-2021) who underwent transurethral resection or biopsy of bladder tumors. Outcome variables included sensitivity and negative and positive predictive values of BLC and white light cystoscopy (WLC) for the detection of malignant lesions among various races. Overall, 2379 separate lesions/tumors were identified from 1292 patients, of whom 1095 (85%) were Caucasian, 96 (7%) were African American, 51 (4%) were Asian, and 50 (4%) were Hispanic. The sensitivity of BLC was higher than that of WLC in the total cohort, as well as in the Caucasian and Asian subgroups. The addition of BLC to WLC increased the detection rate by 10% for any malignant lesion in the total cohort, with the greatest increase in Asian patients (18%). Additionally, the positive predictive value of BLC was highest in Asian patients (94%), while Hispanic patients had the highest negative predictive value (86%). Our study showed that regardless of race, BLC increases the detection of bladder cancer when combined with WLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian
- Department of Urology, Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (S.-S.L.-S.); (A.G.)
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Department of Urology, Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (S.-S.L.-S.); (A.G.)
| | | | - Kamal Pohar
- Department of Urology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | | | - John Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS 66045, USA; (J.M.H.); (J.T.)
| | - Max Kates
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA;
| | | | - Jennifer M. Taylor
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Joseph C. Liao
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA;
| | | | - Sima P. Porten
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA;
| | - Gary D. Steinberg
- Department of Urology, Allina Health Cancer Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA;
| | - Mark D. Tyson
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| | - Yair Lotan
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA;
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; (S.-S.L.-S.); (A.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
von Deimling M, Mertens LS, Furrer M, Li R, Tendijck GAH, Taylor J, Crocetto F, Maas M, Mari A, Pichler R, Moschini M, Tully KH, D'Andrea D, Laukhtina E, Del Giudice F, Marcq G, Velev M, Gallioli A, Albisinni S, Mori K, Khanna A, Rink M, Fisch M, Minervini A, Black PC, Lotan Y, Spiess PE, Kiss B, Shariat SF, Pradere B. The optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38470089 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles needed to achieve a pathological response in patients with clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa) who received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 388 patients who received three or four cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine or (dose-dense) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), followed by consolidative RC for cTanyN1-3M0 BCa. We compared pathological complete (pCR = ypT0N0) and objective response (pOR = yp ≤T1N0) between treatment groups. Predictors of pCR and/or pOR were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated the association between the number of induction chemotherapy cycles administered and survival outcomes on multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 101 and 287 patients received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy, respectively. Of these, 72 (19%) and 128 (33%) achieved pCR and pOR response, respectively. The pCR (20%, 18%) and pOR (40%, 31%) rates did not differ significantly between patients receiving three or four cycles (P > 0.05). The number of cycles was not associated with pCR or pOR on multivariable logistic regression analyses. The 2-year OS estimates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74) and 63% (95% CI 0.58-0.7) for patients receiving three or four cycles, respectively. Receiving three vs four cycles was not associated with OS and CSS on uni- or multivariable Cox regression analyses. CONCLUSION Pathological response and survival outcomes did not differ between administering three or four induction chemotherapy cycles in patients with cN+ BCa. A fewer cycles (minimum three) may be oncologically sufficient in patients with cN+ BCa, while decreasing the wait for definitive local therapy in those patients who end up without a response to chemotherapy. This warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Furrer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Kantonsspital Olten and Bürgerspital Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Guus A H Tendijck
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Moritz Maas
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille, France
- CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Maud Velev
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urosud, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Woldu S, Lotan Y. Reply to Khurshid R. Ghani's letter to editor regarding the article "Early experience with UGN-101 for the treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer: a multicenter evaluation of practice patterns and outcomes". Urol Oncol 2024; 42:36. [PMID: 38320936 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Solomon Woldu
- UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Department of Urology, 2001 Inwood WCB3 4th floor, Dallas, Texas 75390-9110
| | - Yair Lotan
- UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Department of Urology, 2001 Inwood WCB3 4th floor, Dallas, Texas 75390-9110.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
von Deimling M, Furrer M, Mertens LS, Mari A, van Ginkel N, Bacchiani M, Maas M, Pichler R, Li R, Moschini M, Bianchi A, Vetterlein MW, Lonati C, Crocetto F, Taylor J, Tully KH, Afferi L, Soria F, Del Giudice F, Longoni M, Laukhtina E, Antonelli A, Rink M, Fisch M, Lotan Y, Spiess PE, Black PC, Kiss B, Pradere B, Shariat SF. Impact of the extent of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024; 133:341-350. [PMID: 37904652 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the oncological impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) vs standard PLND (sPLND) during radical cystectomy (RC) in clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective, multicentre study we included 969 patients who underwent RC with sPLND (internal/external iliac and obturator lymph nodes) or ePLND (sPLND plus common iliac and presacral nodes) with or without platin-based peri-operative chemotherapy for cTany N1-3 M0 BCa between 1991 and 2022. We assessed the impact of ePLND on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the distribution of recurrences (locoregional and distant recurrences). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We performed propensity-score matching using covariates associated with the extent of PLND in univariable logistic regression analysis. The association of the extent of PLND with RFS and OS was investigated using Cox regression models. RESULTS Of 969 cN+ patients, 510 were 1:1 matched on propensity scores. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to recurrence was 8 (4-16) months, and median (IQR) follow-up of alive patients was 30 (13-51) months. Disease recurrence was observed in 104 patients in the ePLND and 107 in the sPLND group. Of these, 136 (27%), 47 (9.2%) and 19 patients (3.7%) experienced distant, locoregional, or both distant and locoregional disease recurrence, respectively. When stratified by the extent of PLND, we did not find a difference in recurrence patterns (P > 0.05). ePLND improved neither RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.19; P = 0.5) nor OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.01; P = 0.06) compared to sPLND. Stratification by induction chemotherapy did not change outcomes. CONCLUSION Performing an ePLND at the time of RC in cN+ patients improved neither RFS nor OS compared to sPLND, regardless of induction chemotherapy status. Pretreatment risk stratification is paramount to identify ideal candidates for RC with ePLND as part of a multimodal treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Furrer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Olten, Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Noor van Ginkel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mara Bacchiani
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Moritz Maas
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Malte W Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Longoni
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urosud, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Amara CS, Kami Reddy KR, Yuntao Y, Chan YS, Piyarathna DWB, Dobrolecki LE, Shih DJH, Shi Z, Xu J, Huang S, Ellis MJ, Apolo AB, Ballester LY, Gao J, Hansel DE, Lotan Y, Hodges HC, Lerner SP, Creighton CJ, Sreekumar A, Zheng WJ, Msaouel P, Kavuri SM, Putluri N. The IL6/JAK/STAT3 signaling axis is a therapeutic vulnerability in SMARCB1-deficient bladder cancer. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1373. [PMID: 38355560 PMCID: PMC10867091 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45132-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
SMARCB1 loss has long been observed in many solid tumors. However, there is a need to elucidate targetable pathways driving growth and metastasis in SMARCB1-deficient tumors. Here, we demonstrate that SMARCB1 deficiency, defined as genomic SMARCB1 copy number loss associated with reduced mRNA, drives disease progression in patients with bladder cancer by engaging STAT3. SMARCB1 loss increases the chromatin accessibility of the STAT3 locus in vitro. Orthotopically implanted SMARCB1 knockout (KO) cell lines exhibit increased tumor growth and metastasis. SMARCB1-deficient tumors show an increased IL6/JAK/STAT3 signaling axis in in vivo models and patients. Furthermore, a pSTAT3 selective inhibitor, TTI-101, reduces tumor growth in SMARCB1 KO orthotopic cell line-derived xenografts and a SMARCB1-deficient patient derived xenograft model. We have identified a gene signature generated from SMARCB1 KO tumors that predicts SMARCB1 deficiency in patients. Overall, these findings support the clinical evaluation of STAT3 inhibitors for the treatment of SMARCB1-deficient bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandra Sekhar Amara
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Karthik Reddy Kami Reddy
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yang Yuntao
- Mcwilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yuen San Chan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Center for Precision Environmental Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | | | - Lacey Elizabeth Dobrolecki
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - David J H Shih
- Mcwilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Zhongcheng Shi
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jun Xu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shixia Huang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Education, Innovation and Technology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Matthew J Ellis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Andrea B Apolo
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Leomar Y Ballester
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jianjun Gao
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - H Courtney Hodges
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Center for Precision Environmental Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, USA
| | - Seth P Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Chad J Creighton
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Arun Sreekumar
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - W Jim Zheng
- Mcwilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Shyam M Kavuri
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Nagireddy Putluri
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Advanced Technology Cores, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lotan Y, Agarwal P, Black P, Dickstein R, Kamat AM, Lee B, Narayan VM, Porten S, Psutka SP, Smith AK, Svatek RS, Williams SB, Woldu S. Standardization of the evaluation and surveillance of patients with BCG unresponsive high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer clinical trials. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00020-6. [PMID: 38307803 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
There are multiple ongoing and planned clinical trials that are evaluating novel therapies to treat patients with BCG-unresponsive high grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Importantly, there is considerable variation in surveillance strategies between these clinical trials, specifically with regards to the use of advanced imaging, enhanced cystoscopy, and mandatory biopsies, which could impact landmark efficacy assessments of investigational agents. To present guideline recommendations for the standardization of cystoscopic evaluation, surveillance, and efficacy assessments for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC participating in clinical trials. On September 29, 2023 at the annual meeting of the International Bladder Cancer Network, a breakout session was convened, during which representatives from various disciplines discussed potential guidance statements with opportunity for discussion and comment. A set of statements regarding use of white light and enhanced cystoscopy were developed to help guide a pragmatic approach to surveillance and efficacy assessments of patients in clinical trials. The use of "for cause" and "mandatory" biopsies was also addressed. A standard approach to evaluation of patients within the context of clinical trials is necessary to accurately assess the efficacy of novel agents, especially within single arm trials that lack an appropriate comparator. Additionally, the utilization and timing of mandatory biopsies is critical, as these biopsies may impact both disease evaluations and the determination of duration of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | | | - Peter Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia
| | - Rian Dickstein
- Department of Surgery-Urology, University of Maryland BWMC
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Byron Lee
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
| | | | - Sima Porten
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | | | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas, Medical Branch Health System
| | - Solomon Woldu
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Linehan J, Gottlieb J, Woldu SL, Labbate C, Rose K, Sexton W, Kaimakliotis H, Jacob J, Dickstein R, Nieder A, Bjurlin M, Humphreys M, Ghodoussipour S, Quek M, O'Donnell M, Eisner BH, Feldman AS, Matin SF, Lotan Y, Murray KS. Corrigendum to "Route of Administration for UGN-101 and Impact on Oncological and Safety Outcomes" [Eur. Urol. Focus (2023)]. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:211. [PMID: 37640582 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josh Gottlieb
- Providence Specialty Medical Group, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Craig Labbate
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kyle Rose
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Joseph Jacob
- State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Rian Dickstein
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, MD, USA; Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alan Nieder
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Marc Bjurlin
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Marcus Quek
- Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Surena F Matin
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jacob JM, Woldu SL, Linehan J, Labbate C, Rose KM, Sexton WJ, Tachibana I, Kaimakliotis H, Nieder A, Bjurlin MA, Humphreys M, Ghodoussipour SB, Quek ML, Johnson B, O'Donnell M, Eisner BH, Feldman AS, Murray KS, Matin SF, Lotan Y, Dickstein RJ. First analysis of the safety and efficacy of UGN-101 in the treatment of ureteral tumors. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:20.e17-20.e23. [PMID: 37517898 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE UGN-101 has been approved for the chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involving the renal pelvis and calyces. Herein is the first reported cohort of patients with ureteral tumors treated with UGN-101. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with UGN-101 for UTUC at 15 high-volume academic and community centers focusing on outcomes of patients treated for ureteral disease. Patients received UGN-101 with either adjuvant or chemo-ablative intent. Response rates are reported for patients receiving chemo-ablative intent. Adverse outcomes were characterized with a focus on the rate of ureteral stenosis. RESULTS In a cohort of 132 patients and 136 renal units, 47 cases had tumor involvement of the ureter, with 12 cases of ureteral tumor only (8.8%) and 35 cases of ureteral plus renal pelvic tumors (25.7%). Of the 23 patients with ureteral involvement who received UGN-101 induction with chemo-ablative intent, the complete response was 47.8%, which did not differ significantly from outcomes in patients without ureteral involvement. Fourteen patients (37.8%) with ureteral tumors had significant ureteral stenosis at first post-treatment evaluation, however, when excluding those with pre-existing hydronephrosis or ureteral stenosis, only 5.4% of patients developed new clinically significant stenosis. CONCLUSIONS UGN-101 appears to be safe and may have similar efficacy in treating low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter as compared to renal pelvic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Jacob
- State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | | | - Craig Labbate
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc A Bjurlin
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Brett Johnson
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Surena F Matin
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Rian J Dickstein
- University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, MD; Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gore JL, Wolff EM, Comstock BA, Follmer KM, Nash MG, Basu A, Chisolm S, MacLean DB, Lee JR, Lotan Y, Porten SP, Steinberg GD, Chang SS, Gilbert SM, Kessler LG, Smith AB. Protocol of the Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options (CISTO) study: a pragmatic, prospective multicenter observational cohort study of recurrent high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1127. [PMID: 37980511 PMCID: PMC10657633 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11605-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder cancer poses a significant public health burden, with high recurrence and progression rates in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Current treatment options include bladder-sparing therapies (BST) and radical cystectomy, both with associated risks and benefits. However, evidence supporting optimal management decisions for patients with recurrent high-grade NMIBC remains limited, leading to uncertainty for patients and clinicians. The CISTO (Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options) Study aims to address this critical knowledge gap by comparing outcomes between patients undergoing BST and radical cystectomy. METHODS The CISTO Study is a pragmatic, prospective observational cohort trial across 36 academic and community urology practices in the US. The study will enroll 572 patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who select management with either BST or radical cystectomy. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life (QOL) at 12 months as measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C30. Secondary outcomes include bladder cancer-specific QOL, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and financial toxicity. The study will also assess patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Statistical analyses will employ targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) to address treatment selection bias and confounding by indication. DISCUSSION The CISTO Study is powered to detect clinically important differences in QOL and cancer-specific survival between the two treatment approaches. By including a diverse patient population, the study also aims to assess outcomes across the following patient characteristics: age, gender, race, burden of comorbid health conditions, cancer severity, caregiver status, social determinants of health, and rurality. Treatment outcomes may also vary by patient preferences, health literacy, and baseline QOL. The CISTO Study will fill a crucial evidence gap in the management of recurrent high-grade NMIBC, providing evidence-based guidance for patients and clinicians in choosing between BST and radical cystectomy. The CISTO study will provide an evidence-based approach to identifying the right treatment for the right patient at the right time in the challenging clinical setting of recurrent high-grade NMIBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03933826. Registered on May 1, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Erika M Wolff
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bryan A Comstock
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Michael G Nash
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anirban Basu
- Departments of Pharmacy, Health Services, and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Jenney R Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Scott M Gilbert
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Larry G Kessler
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zemdegs J, Iroz A, Vecchio M, Roze S, Lotan Y. Water intake and recurrent urinary tract infections prevention: economic impact analysis in seven countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1197. [PMID: 37924070 PMCID: PMC10623695 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10234-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To estimate the economic impact of preventing urinary tract infections (UTI) by increasing water intake among women with recurrent UTI and low fluid intake across seven countries: France, United Kingdom, Spain, United States of America, Mexico, China and Australia. METHODS A Markov model was developed to compare costs and outcomes of UTIs associated with low fluid intake in women versus a strategy of primary prevention by increasing water intake. Model inputs were based on randomized controlled trial data which found that increasing water intake by 1.5 L/day decreased the risk of developing cystitis by 48% in women with low fluid intake and recurrent UTI. A time horizon of 10 years was used; outcomes were from the payer perspective and included both direct and indirect costs, reported in 2019 United States dollars ($). Discounting rates varied by country. Scenarios of increasing levels of compliance to the increased water intake strategy were evaluated. RESULTS The total cost of one UTI episode, including diagnostics, treatment and complications, ranged from $2164 (Mexico) to $7671 (Australia). Assuming 80% compliance with the increased water intake strategy over a 10-year time horizon, the number of UTIs prevented ranged from 435,845 (Australia) to 24150,272 (China), resulting in total savings of 286 million (Australia) to $4.4 billion (China). Across all countries, increased water intake resulted in lower cost and fewer UTIs compared with low water intake. CONCLUSION Preventing recurrent UTIs by increasing water intake would reduce both the clinical and economic burden associated with UTI. Public, healthcare professionals and patients should be made aware about the preventive positive impact of appropriate water intake on UTIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Zemdegs
- Danone Global Research and Inovation Center, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| | - Alison Iroz
- Danone Global Research and Inovation Center, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| | | | | | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khene ZE, Kammerer-Jacquet SF, Bigot P, Rabilloud N, Albiges L, Margulis V, De Crevoisier R, Acosta O, Rioux-Leclercq N, Lotan Y, Rouprêt M, Bensalah K. Clinical Application of Digital and Computational Pathology in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00234-1. [PMID: 37925349 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Computational pathology is a new interdisciplinary field that combines traditional pathology with modern technologies such as digital imaging and machine learning to better understand the diagnosis, prognosis, and natural history of many diseases. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of digital and computational pathology and its current and potential applications in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in December 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023389282). Risk of bias was assessed according to the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In total, 20 articles were included in the review. All the studies used a retrospective design, and all digital pathology techniques were implemented retrospectively. The studies were classified according to their primary objective: detection, tumor characterization, and patient outcome. Regarding the transition to clinical practice, several studies showed promising potential. However, none presented a comprehensive assessment of clinical utility and implementation. Notably, there was substantial heterogeneity for both the strategies used for model building and the performance metrics reported. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the vast potential of digital and computational pathology for the detection, classification, and assessment of oncological outcomes in RCC. Preliminary work in this field has yielded promising results. However, these models have not yet reached a stage where they can be integrated into routine clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY Computational pathology combines traditional pathology and technologies such as digital imaging and artificial intelligence to improve diagnosis of disease and identify prognostic factors and new biomarkers. The number of studies exploring its potential in kidney cancer is rapidly increasing. However, despite the surge in research activity, computational pathology is not yet ready for widespread routine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zine-Eddine Khene
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France; Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Inserm U1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France; Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Solène-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet
- Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Inserm U1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France; Department of Pathology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Bigot
- Department of Urology, University of Angers, Rennes, France
| | - Noémie Rabilloud
- Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Inserm U1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Oscar Acosta
- Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image, Inserm U1099, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | | | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, La Pitie Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Linehan J, Gottlieb J, Woldu SL, Labbate C, Rose K, Sexton W, Kaimakliotis H, Jacob J, Dickstein R, Nieder A, Bjurlin M, Humphreys M, Ghodoussipor S, Quek M, O'Donnell M, Eisner BH, Feldman AS, Matin SF, Lotan Y, Murray KS. Route of Administration for UGN-101 and Impact on Oncological and Safety Outcomes. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:1052-1058. [PMID: 37263827 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND UGN-101 can be used for chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The gel can be administered via a retrograde route through a ureteral catheter or an antegrade route via a nephrostomy tube. OBJECTIVE To report outcomes of UGN-101 by route of administration. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a retrospective review of 132 patients from 15 institutions who were treated with UGN-101 for low-grade UTUC via retrograde versus antegrade administration. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Survival outcomes are reported per patient. Treatment, complications, and recurrence outcomes are reported per renal unit. Statistical analysis was performed for primary endpoints of oncological response and ureteral stricture occurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 136 renal units were evaluated, comprising 78 retrograde and 58 antegrade instillations. Median follow-up was 7.4 mo. There were 120 cases (91%) of biopsy-proven low-grade UTUC. Tumors were in the renal pelvis alone in 89 cases (65%), in the ureter alone in 12 cases (9%), and in both in 35 cases (26%). Seventy-six patients (56%) had residual disease before UGN-101 treatment. Chemoablation with UGN-101 was used in 50/78 (64%) retrograde cases and 26/58 (45%) antegrade cases. A complete response according to inspection and cytology was achieved in 31 (48%) retrograde and 30 (60%) antegrade renal units (p = 0.1). Clavien grade 3 ureteral stricture occurred in 21 retrograde cases (32%) and only six (12%) antegrade cases (p < 0.01). Limitations include treatment bias, as patients in the antegrade group were more likely to undergo endoscopic mechanical ablation before UGN-101 instillation. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary results show a significantly lower rate of stricture occurrence with antegrade administration of UGN-101, with no apparent impact on oncological efficacy. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared results for two different delivery routes for the drug UGN-101 for treatment of cancer in the upper urinary tract. For the antegrade route, a tube is inserted through the skin into the kidney. For the retrograde route, a catheter is inserted past the bladder into the upper urinary tract. Our results show a lower rate of narrowing of the ureter (the tube draining urine from the kidney into the bladder) using the antegrade route, with no difference in cancer control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josh Gottlieb
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Craig Labbate
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kyle Rose
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Joseph Jacob
- State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Rian Dickstein
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore Washington Medical Center, Glen Burnie, MD, USA; Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alan Nieder
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Marc Bjurlin
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Marcus Quek
- Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Surena F Matin
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Johnson BA, Raman JD, Best SL, Lotan Y. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use vs Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal. J Endourol 2023; 37:1139-1144. [PMID: 37565290 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Reusable cystoscopes are associated with risks of cross-contamination, need for chemical reprocessing, mechanical breakdown, maintenance costs, and labor for cleaning. A sterile, single-use cystoscope may reduce or eliminate the source of these infections while also decreasing exposure to reprocessing chemical agents. In this multicenter, randomized trial, we sought to compare single use with reusable endoscopes for ureteral stent removal. Methods: A three-center, randomized, dual-arm postmarket clinical trial was performed to compare the single-use cystoscope (Ambu A/S) with standard-of-care flexible reusable cystoscopes for outpatient ureteral stent removal. A total of 102 patients were randomized and evaluated from baseline through day 10 postprocedure. Primary endpoint was successful stent removal. Secondary endpoints were time from preparation to disposal/reprocessing, adverse events (AEs), and clinician satisfaction. Results: A total of 102 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 manner. The successful stent removal rate was 51/51 (reusable) and 50/51 (single use). One patient required the conversion to reusable cystoscope owing to grasper passage issue. Median time from prep for the procedure to disposal/prep for reprocessing was 10.2 minutes for the single use and 18.4 minutes for the reusable (p < 0.001). There was no difference in clinician satisfaction between both arms. There was no difference in AEs between arms and no device causal attribution for any AE reports. There was one serious AE necessitating hospitalization for infection in the reusable arm. Conclusion: The randomized-controlled trial of single-use cystoscopes vs reusables showed comparable device success with significant time savings for single use and equivalent clinician satisfaction. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov database (NCT04829461) on April 2, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett A Johnson
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sara L Best
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ho MD, Black AJ, Zargar H, Fairey AS, Mertens LS, Dinney CP, Mir MC, Krabbe LM, Cookson MS, Jacobsen NE, Montgomery JS, Yu EY, Xylinas E, Kassouf W, Dall‘Era MA, Vasdev N, Sridhar SS, McGrath JS, Aning J, Holzbeierlein JM, Thorpe AC, Shariat SF, Wright JL, Morgan TM, Bivalacqua TJ, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Grivas P, Stephenson AJ, Shah JB, van Rhijn BW, Daneshmand S, Spiess PE, Black PC. The effect of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the renal function of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2023; 17:301-309. [PMID: 37851909 PMCID: PMC10581722 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Cisplatin, however, can induce renal toxicity. Furthermore, RC is an independent risk factor for renal injury, with decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of up to 6 mL/min/1.73 m2 reported at one year postoperatively. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of cisplatin-based NAC and RC on the renal function of patients undergoing both. METHODS We analyzed a multicenter database of patients with MIBC, all of whom received cisplatin-based NAC prior to RC. eGFR values were collected at time points T1 (before NAC), T2 (after NAC but before RC), and T3 (one year post-RC). eGFR and proportion of patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage ≥3) were compared between these time points. As all patients in this dataset had received NAC, we identified a retrospective cohort of patients from one institution who had undergone RC during the same time period without NAC for context. RESULTS We identified 234 patients with available renal function data. From T1 to T3, there was a mean decline in eGFR of 17% (13 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the NAC cohort and an increase in proportion of patients with stage ≥3 CKD from 27% to 50%. The parallel cohort of patients who did not receive NAC was comprised of 236 patients. The mean baseline eGFR in this cohort was lower than in the NAC cohort (66 vs. 75 mL/min/1.73 m2). The mean eGFR decline in this non-NAC cohort from T1 to T3 was 6% (4 mL/min/1.73 m2), and the proportion of those with stage ≥3 CKD increased from 37% to 51%. CONCLUSIONS Administration of NAC prior to RC was associated with a 17% decline in eGFR and a nearly doubled incidence of stage ≥3 CKD at one year after RC. Patients who underwent RC without NAC had a higher rate of stage ≥3 CKD at baseline but appeared to have less renal function loss at one year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D. Ho
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anna J. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Homayoun Zargar
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adrian S. Fairey
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Colin P. Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Maria C. Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Michael S. Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | | | - Jeffrey S. Montgomery
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc A. Dall‘Era
- Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - John S. McGrath
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Aning
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Jeff M. Holzbeierlein
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Andrew C. Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | | | - Scott North
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Jay B. Shah
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Bas W. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Philippe E. Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Peter C. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Salari K, Sundi D, Lee JJ, Wu S, Wu CL, DiFiore G, Yan QR, Pienkny A, Lee CK, Oberlin D, Barme G, Piser J, Kahn R, Collins E, Phillips KG, Caruso VM, Goudarzi M, Garcia-Ransom M, Lentz PS, Evans-Holm ME, MacBride AR, Fischer DS, Haddadzadeh IJ, Mazzarella BC, Gray JW, Koppie TM, Bicocca VT, Levin TG, Lotan Y, Feldman AS. Development and Multicenter Case-Control Validation of Urinary Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis, Surveillance, and Risk-Prediction. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3668-3680. [PMID: 37439796 PMCID: PMC10502470 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Urinary comprehensive genomic profiling (uCGP) uses next-generation sequencing to identify mutations associated with urothelial carcinoma and has the potential to improve patient outcomes by noninvasively diagnosing disease, predicting grade and stage, and estimating recurrence risk. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN This is a multicenter case-control study using banked urine specimens collected from patients undergoing initial diagnosis/hematuria workup or urothelial carcinoma surveillance. A total of 581 samples were analyzed by uCGP: 333 for disease classification and grading algorithm development, and 248 for blinded validation. uCGP testing was done using the UroAmp platform, which identifies five classes of mutation: single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variants, small insertion-deletions, copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, and aneuploidy. UroAmp algorithms predicting urothelial carcinoma tumor presence, grade, and recurrence risk were compared with cytology, cystoscopy, and pathology. RESULTS uCGP algorithms had a validation sensitivity/specificity of 95%/90% for initial cancer diagnosis in patients with hematuria and demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. A positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 9.2 and a negative DLR of 0.05 demonstrate the ability to risk-stratify patients presenting with hematuria. In surveillance patients, binary urothelial carcinoma classification demonstrated an NPV of 91%. uCGP recurrence-risk prediction significantly prognosticated future recurrence (hazard ratio, 6.2), whereas clinical risk factors did not. uCGP demonstrated positive predictive value (PPV) comparable with cytology (45% vs. 42%) with much higher sensitivity (79% vs. 25%). Finally, molecular grade predictions had a PPV of 88% and a specificity of 95%. CONCLUSIONS uCGP enables noninvasive, accurate urothelial carcinoma diagnosis and risk stratification in both hematuria and urothelial carcinoma surveillance patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyan Salari
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Debasish Sundi
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center & Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jason J. Lee
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shulin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gabrielle DiFiore
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center & Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Q. Robert Yan
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Andrew Pienkny
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Chi K. Lee
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Daniel Oberlin
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Greg Barme
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Joel Piser
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Robert Kahn
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Edward Collins
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joe W. Gray
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Theresa M. Koppie
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
- Willamette Urology, Salem, Oregon
| | | | | | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| | - Adam S. Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gold SA, Goueli R, Mostardeiro TR, Carpinito GP, El-Eishy A, Mauck R, Woldu SL, Strand DW, Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG, Costa DN, Gahan JC. Optimal Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathways for Men With Prostatomegaly in the MRI Era. Urology 2023; 179:95-100. [PMID: 37182648 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate utilities of multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsy to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in men with prostatomegaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of multiparametric MRI obtained for elevated PSA between 2017 and 2020. We selected patients with prostates ≥80 g who had undergone biopsy. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as grade group ≥2. Predictive and logistic regression analyses quantified impacts of diagnostic components. RESULTS A total of 338 patients met inclusion criteria: 89 (26.3%) had clinically significant prostate cancer. On MRI, positive predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer was 26.5% for PIRADS 4% and 73.5% for PIRADS 5; negative predictive value for MRI without suspicious lesions was 98.8%. Applying PSA density to MRI yielded a negative predictive value of 78.9% for PIRADS 4 lesions at PSA density <0.05 and a positive predictive value of 90.5% for PIRADS 5 lesions at PSA density ≥0.15. Targeted (versus standard) biopsy reduced likelihood of missing clinically significant prostate cancer by >50% (12.2% vs 28.3%). MRI in-bore biopsies trended towards better accuracy versus MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies (75% versus 52%). On logistic regression analyses, MRI improved predictive accuracy (area under the curve 0.91), and PIRADS score demonstrated the strongest association with clinically significant prostate cancer (odds ratio 6.42, P < .001). CONCLUSION For large prostates, MRI is less predictive of clinically significant prostate cancer but effectively rules out malignancy. PSA density better informs biopsy decisions for PIRADS 4 and 5 lesions. There may be a pronounced role for targeted biopsy, specifically in-bore, in prostatomegaly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Gold
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ramy Goueli
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Alfarooq El-Eishy
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ryan Mauck
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Douglas W Strand
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Claus G Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Daniel N Costa
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jeffrey C Gahan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rose KM, Murray KS, Labbate C, Woldu S, Linehan J, Jacob J, Kaimakliotis H, Dickstein R, Feldman A, Matin SF, Lotan Y, Humphreys MR, Sexton WJ. Mitomycin Gel (UGN-101) as a Kidney-sparing Treatment for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Imperative Indications and High-grade Disease. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:807-812. [PMID: 37059620 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracavitary UGN-101 is approved for the treatment of low-grade noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Post-commercialization studies underscore the benefit of UGN-101 administration for patients with imperative indications for whom radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is not a viable option. OBJECTIVE To describe the use, efficacy, and safety of UGN-101 in patients with UTUC with imperative indications for renal preservation, including high-grade disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients receiving UGN-101 with imperative indications were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter centralized registry from 15 high-volume academic and community centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We defined imperative indications as patients with a solitary kidney, the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, bilateral UTUC, and patients unfit for or unwilling to undergo surgical extirpation. Tumor characteristics, disease progression/recurrence, and adverse events were recorded on a per-renal-unit basis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS UGN-101 was instilled into 52 renal units (38%) in 48 patients for imperative indications, including 29 patients (56%) with a solitary kidney, 11 kidneys (21%) in the setting of bilateral UTUC, six patients (12%) with CKD, and six patients (12%) who were unfit for or unwilling to undergo RNU. Twelve renal units had biopsy-proven high-grade papillary disease. Tumors were completely ablated before induction therapy in 34% of cases, while 66% had tumor present. Following induction therapy, 17 patients (40%) had no evidence of disease (NED) on ureteroscopy, 88% of whom maintained this status at median follow-up of 10.8 mo. In the cohort with high-grade disease, five patients (45%) had NED at initial post-induction primary disease evaluation. Adverse events included pyelonephritis (8%), ureteral stenosis (8%), anemia (6%), and acute renal failure (4%). Limitations include the retrospective study design, the lack of long-term follow up, and patient selection bias. CONCLUSIONS Intracavitary therapy with UGN-101 in patients with UTUC and imperative indications shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment modality. While long-term follow-up is needed, this intracavitary treatment may help in prolonging time to RNU and delaying the morbidity of hemodialysis in this comorbid population. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed results for patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract and an additional condition that would not allow kidney removal who received treatment with a gel called UGN-101. Our results suggest that UGN-101 shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment. It may delay the time until kidney removal is needed in these patients and avoid the negative effects associated with dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle M Rose
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | | | - Craig Labbate
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Solomon Woldu
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Joseph Jacob
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Surena F Matin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kaimakliotis HZ, Tachibana I, Woldu S, Labbate C, Jacob J, Murray K, Rose K, Sexton W, Dickstein R, Linehan J, Nieder A, Bjurlin M, Humphreys M, Ghodoussipour S, Quek M, O'Donnell M, Eisner BH, Matin SF, Lotan Y, Feldman AS. The ablative effect of mitomycin reverse thermal gel: Expanding the role for nephron preservation therapy in low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:387.e1-387.e7. [PMID: 37246135 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assess the real-world ablative effect of mitomycin reverse thermal gel for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in patients who undergo biopsy only or partial ablation and evaluate utility of complete ablation prior to UGN-101. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed low-grade UTUC patients treated with UGN-101 from 15 high-volume centers. Patients were categorized based on initial endoscopic ablation (biopsy only, partial ablation, or complete ablation) and by size of remaining tumor (complete ablation, <1cm, 1-3cm, or >3cm) prior to UGN-101. The primary outcome was rendered disease free (RDF) rate at first post-UGN-101 ureteroscopy (URS), defined as complete response or partial response with minimal mechanical ablation to endoscopically clear the upper tract of visible disease. RESULTS One hundred and sixteen patients were included for analysis after excluding those with high-grade disease. At first post-UGN-101 URS, there were no differences in RDF rates between those who at initial URS (pre-UGN-101) had complete ablation (RDF 77.0%), partial ablation (RDF 55.9%) or biopsy only (RDF 66.7%) (P = 0.14). Similarly, a complimentary analysis focusing on tumor size (completely ablated, <1cm, 1-3cm or >3cm) prior to UGN-101 induction did not demonstrate significant differences in RDF rates (P = 0.17). CONCLUSION The results of the early real-world experience suggest that UGN-101 may play a role in initial chemo-ablative cytoreduction of larger volume low-grade tumors that may not initially appear to be amenable to renal preservation. Further studies will help to better quantify the chemo-ablative effect and to identify clinical factors for patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isamu Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Solomon Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Craig Labbate
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph Jacob
- Department of Urology, State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY
| | - Katie Murray
- Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
| | - Kyle Rose
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Wade Sexton
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Rian Dickstein
- Department of Urology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Department of Urology, Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennifer Linehan
- Department of Urology, Providence Specialty Medical Group, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Alan Nieder
- Department of Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL
| | - Marc Bjurlin
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Saum Ghodoussipour
- Department of Urology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Marcus Quek
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Michael O'Donnell
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA
| | - Brian H Eisner
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Adam S Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Claps F, van de Kamp MW, Mayr R, Bostrom PJ, Shariat SF, Hippe K, Bertz S, Neuzillet Y, Sanders J, Otto W, van der Heijden MS, Jewett MAS, Stöhr R, Zlotta AR, Trombetta C, Eckstein M, Mertens LS, Burger M, Soorojebally Y, Wullich B, Bartoletti R, Radvanyi F, Pavan N, Sirab N, Mir MC, Pouessel D, van der Kwast TH, Hartmann A, Lotan Y, Bussani R, Allory Y, van Rhijn BWG. Prognostic impact of variant histologies in urothelial bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2023; 132:170-180. [PMID: 36748180 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate variant histologies (VHs) for disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed a multi-institutional cohort of 1082 patients treated with upfront RC for cT1-4aN0M0 urothelial BCa at eight centres. Univariable and multivariable Cox' regression analyses were used to assess the effect of different VHs on DSS in overall cohort and three stage-based analyses. The stages were defined as 'organ-confined' (≤pT2N0), 'locally advanced' (pT3-4N0) and 'node-positive' (pTanyN1-3). RESULTS Overall, 784 patients (72.5%) had pure urothelial carcinoma (UC), while the remaining 298 (27.5%) harboured a VH. Squamous differentiation was the most common VH, observed in 166 patients (15.3%), followed by micropapillary (40 patients [3.7%]), sarcomatoid (29 patients [2.7%]), glandular (18 patients [1.7%]), lymphoepithelioma-like (14 patients [1.3%]), small-cell (13 patients [1.2%]), clear-cell (eight patients [0.7%]), nested (seven patients [0.6%]) and plasmacytoid VH (three patients [0.3%]). The median follow-up was 2.3 years. Overall, 534 (49.4%) disease-related deaths occurred. In uni- and multivariable analyses, plasmacytoid and small-cell VHs were associated with worse DSS in the overall cohort (both P = 0.04). In univariable analyses, sarcomatoid VH was significantly associated with worse DSS, while lymphoepithelioma-like VH had favourable DSS compared to pure UC. Clear-cell (P = 0.015) and small-cell (P = 0.011) VH were associated with worse DSS in the organ-confined and node-positive cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS More than 25% of patients harboured a VH at time of RC. Compared to pure UC, clear-cell, plasmacytoid, small-cell and sarcomatoid VHs were associated with worse DSS, while lymphoepithelioma-like VH was characterized by a DSS benefit. Accurate pathological diagnosis of VHs may ensure tailored counselling to identify patients who require more intensive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter J Bostrom
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Katrin Hippe
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center - Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simone Bertz
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yanish Soorojebally
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology & Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Unit of Urology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - François Radvanyi
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nanour Sirab
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rossana Bussani
- Department of Pathology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ecke TH, Lotan Y, Massfelder T. Editorial: Identifying novel biomarkers in bladder cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1191736. [PMID: 37469396 PMCID: PMC10353301 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1191736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten H. Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad, Saarow, Germany
- Deparment of Urology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Thierry Massfelder
- INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research) UMR_S1260, Université de Strasbourg, Regenerative Nanomedicine, Centre de Recherche en Biomédecine de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
von Deimling M, D'Andrea D, Pradere B, Laukhtina E, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Majdoub M, Rajwa P, Pallauf M, Singla N, Soria F, Margulis V, Chlosta P, Karakiewicz PI, Roupret M, Teoh JYC, Fisch M, Rink M, Moschini M, Lotan Y, Shariat SF. Clinical value of cholinesterase in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract carcinoma. World J Urol 2023; 41:1861-1868. [PMID: 37294372 PMCID: PMC10352439 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04449-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic value and the clinical impact of preoperative serum cholinesterase (ChoE) levels on decision-making in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). METHODS A retrospective review of an established multi-institutional UTUC database was performed. We evaluated preoperative ChoE as a continuous and dichotomized variable using a visual assessment of the functional form of the association of ChoE with cancer-specific survival (CSS). We used univariable and multivariable Cox regression models to establish its association with recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and overall survival (OS). Discrimination was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the impact on clinical decision-making of preoperative ChoE. RESULTS A total of 748 patients were available for analysis. Within a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR 15-64), 191 patients experienced disease recurrence, and 257 died, with 165 dying of UTUC. The optimal ChoE cutoff identified was 5.8 U/l. ChoE as continuous variable was significantly associated with RFS (p < 0.001), OS (p < 0.001), and CSS (p < 0.001) on univariable and multivariable analyses. The concordance index improved by 8%, 4.4%, and 7% for RFS, OS, and CSS, respectively. On DCA, including ChoE did not improve the net benefit of standard prognostic models. CONCLUSION Despite its independent association with RFS, OS, and CSS, preoperative serum ChoE has no impact on clinical decision-making. In future studies, ChoE should be investigated as part of the tumor microenvironment and assessed as part of predictive and prognostic models, specifically in the setting of immune checkpoint-inhibitor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Muhammad Majdoub
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Departments of Urology and Oncology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Labbate C, Woldu S, Murray K, Rose K, Sexton W, Tachibana I, Kaimakliotis H, Jacob J, Dickstein R, Linehan J, Nieder A, Bjurlin M, Humphreys M, Ghodoussipour S, Quek M, O'Donnell M, Eisner B, Feldman A, Lotan Y, Matin SF. Efficacy and Safety of Mitomycin Gel (UGN-101) as an Adjuvant Therapy After Complete Endoscopic Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Urol 2023; 209:872-881. [PMID: 36657029 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe a novel application of the reverse thermal polymer gel of mitomycin C (UGN-101) as adjuvant therapy after complete endoscopic ablation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with UGN-101 from 15 high-volume centers. Adjuvant therapy was defined as treatment administered following visually complete endoscopic ablation. Response at primary endoscopic evaluation was defined as no visual tumor or negative biopsy. Ipsilateral disease-free and progression-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Ureteral stenosis and other adverse events were abstracted from the medical records. Ureteral stenosis was defined as a condition requiring ureteral stent or nephrostomy, or that would typically warrant stent or nephrostomy. RESULTS Adjuvant UGN-101 after complete endoscopic ablation was used in 52 of 115 (45%) renal units in the oncologic analysis. At first endoscopic evaluation, 36/52 (69%) were without visible disease. At 6.8 months' median follow-up, the ipsilateral disease-free rate was 63%. Recurrence after adjuvant UGN-101 therapy was more likely in multifocal tumors compared to unifocal (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.07-9.91). Compared with UGN-101 treatment for chemoablation of measurable disease, there were significantly fewer disease detections with adjuvant therapy (P < .001). Ureteral stenosis after UGN-101 was diagnosed in 10 patients (19%) undergoing adjuvant therapy compared to 17 (29%) undergoing chemoablative therapy (P = .28). CONCLUSIONS In patients being considered for UGN-101, maximal endoscopic ablation prior to UGN-101 treatment may result in fewer patients with disease at first endoscopy and possibly fewer adverse events than primary chemoablative therapy. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if UGN-101 after complete endoscopic ablation will lead to durable disease-free interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Labbate
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Solomon Woldu
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Katie Murray
- Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbus, Missouri
| | - Kyle Rose
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Wade Sexton
- Department of Urology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Isamu Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Joseph Jacob
- State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York
| | - Rian Dickstein
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
- Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Alan Nieder
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida
| | - Marc Bjurlin
- University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Marcus Quek
- Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | | | - Brian Eisner
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adam Feldman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Surena F Matin
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
von Deimling M, Mertens LS, van Rhijn BW, Lotan Y, Spiess PE, Daneshmand S, Black PC, Pallauf M, D'Andrea D, Moschini M, Soria F, Del Giudice F, Afferi L, Laukhtina E, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Teoh JYC, Abufaraj M, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M, Karakiewicz PI, Babjuk M, Gontero P, Xylinas E, Rink M, Shariat SF, Pradere B. Carboplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Clinically Lymph Node–positive Bladder Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 51:39-46. [PMID: 37187719 PMCID: PMC10175724 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There are currently no guideline recommendations regarding the treatment of cisplatin-ineligible, clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). Objective To investigate the oncological efficacy of gemcitabine/carboplatin induction chemotherapy (IC) in comparison to cisplatin-based regimens in cN+ BCa. Design setting and participants This was an observational study of 369 patients with cT2-4 N1-3 M0 BCa. Intervention IC followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary endpoints were the pathological objective response (pOR; ypT0/Ta/Tis/T1 N0) rate and the pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate. We applied 3:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared across groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between the treatment regimen and survival endpoints were tested in multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results and limitations After PSM, a cohort of 216 patients was available for analysis, of whom 162 received cisplatin-based IC and 54 gemcitabine/carboplatin IC. At RC, 54 patients (25%) had a pOR and 36 (17%) had a pCR. The 2-yr CSS was 59.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.9-69%) for patients who received cisplatin-based IC versus 38.8% (95% CI 26-57.9%) for those who received gemcitabine/carboplatin. For the pOR (p = 0.8), ypN0 status at RC (p = 0.5), and cN1 BCa subgroups (p = 0.7), there was no difference in CSS between cisplatin-based IC and gemcitabine/carboplatin. In the cN1 subgroup, treatment with gemcitabine/carboplatin was not associated with shorter OS (p = 0.2) or CSS (p = 0.1) on multivariable Cox regression analysis. Conclusions Cisplatin-based IC seems to be superior to gemcitabine/carboplatin and should be the standard for cisplatin-eligible patients with cN+ BCa. Gemcitabine/carboplatin may be an alternative treatment for selected cisplatin-ineligible patients with cN+ BCa. In particular, selected cisplatin-ineligible patients with cN1 disease may benefit from gemcitabine/carboplatin IC. Patient summary In this multicenter study, we found that selected patients with bladder cancer and clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis who cannot receive standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery to remove their bladder may benefit from chemotherapy with gemcitabine/carboplatin. Patients with a single lymph node metastasis may benefit the most.
Collapse
|
26
|
Vanarsa K, Castillo J, Wang L, Lee KH, Pedroza C, Lotan Y, Mohan C. Comprehensive proteomics and platform validation of urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer diagnosis and staging. BMC Med 2023; 21:133. [PMID: 37016361 PMCID: PMC10074794 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02813-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bladder cancer (BC) is among the most common cancers diagnosed in men in the USA. The current gold standards for the diagnosis of BC are invasive or lack the sensitivity to correctly identify the disease. METHODS An aptamer-based screen analyzed the expression of 1317 proteins in BC compared to urology clinic controls. The top hits were subjected to systems biology analyses. Next, 30 urine proteins were ELISA-validated in an independent cohort of 68 subjects. Three of these proteins were next validated in an independent BC cohort of differing ethnicity. RESULTS Systems biology analysis implicated molecular functions related to the extracellular matrix, collagen, integrin, heparin, and transmembrane tyrosine kinase signaling in BC susceptibility, with HNF4A and NFKB1 emerging as key molecular regulators. STEM analysis of the dysregulated pathways implicated a functional role for the immune system, complement, and interleukins in BC disease progression. Of 21 urine proteins that discriminated BC from urology clinic controls (UC), urine D-dimer displayed the highest accuracy (0.96) and sensitivity of 97%. Furthermore, 8 urine proteins significantly discriminated MIBC from NMIBC (AUC = 0.75-0.99), with IL-8 and IgA being the best performers. Urine IgA and fibronectin exhibited the highest specificity of 80% at fixed sensitivity for identifying advanced BC. CONCLUSIONS Given the high sensitivity (97%) of urine D-dimer for BC, it may have a role in the initial diagnosis or detection of cancer recurrence. On the other hand, urine IL-8 and IgA may have the potential in identifying disease progression during patient follow-up. The use of these biomarkers for initial triage could have a significant impact as the current cystoscopy-based diagnostic and surveillance approach is costly and invasive when compared to a simple urine test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamala Vanarsa
- Department Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, 3517 Cullen Blvd., Room 2027, Houston, TX, 77204-5060, USA
| | - Jessica Castillo
- Department Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, 3517 Cullen Blvd., Room 2027, Houston, TX, 77204-5060, USA
| | - Long Wang
- Department of Urology, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Kyung Hyun Lee
- Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudia Pedroza
- Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Chandra Mohan
- Department Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, 3517 Cullen Blvd., Room 2027, Houston, TX, 77204-5060, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lotan Y, Raman JD, Konety B, Daneshmand S, Schroeck F, Shariat SF, Black P, de Lange M, Asroff S, Goldfischer E, Efros M, Chong KT, Huang E, Chua HL, Wu QH, Yeow S, Lau W, Yong J, Eng M. Urinary Analysis of FGFR3 and TERT Gene Mutations Enhances Performance of Cxbladder Tests and Improves Patient Risk Stratification. J Urol 2023; 209:762-772. [PMID: 36583640 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cxbladder tests are urinary biomarker tests for detection of urothelial carcinoma. We developed enhanced Cxbladder tests that incorporate DNA analysis of 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms for the FGFR3 and TERT genes, in addition to the current 5 mRNA biomarkers and clinical risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two multicenter, prospective studies were undertaken in: (1) U.S. patients with gross hematuria aged ≥18 years and (2) Singaporean patients with gross hematuria or microhematuria aged >21 years. All patients provided a midstream urine sample and underwent cystoscopy. Samples were retrospectively analyzed using enhanced Cxbladder-Triage (risk stratifies patients), enhanced Cxbladder-Detect (risk stratifies patients and detects positive patients), and the combination enhanced Cxbladder-Triage × Cxbladder-Detect. RESULTS In the pooled cohort (N=804; gross hematuria: n=484, microhematuria: n=320), enhanced Cxbladder-Detect had a sensitivity of 97% (95% CI 89%-100%), specificity of 90% (95% CI 88%-92%), and negative predictive value of 99.7% (95% CI 99%-100%) for detection of urothelial carcinoma. Overall, 83% of patients were enhanced Cxbladder-Detect-negative (ie, needed no further work-up). Of 133 enhanced Cxbladder-Detect-positive patients, 59 had a confirmed tumor, of which 19 were low-grade noninvasive papillary carcinoma or papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential. In total, 40 tumors were high-grade Ta, T1-T4, Tis, including concomitant carcinoma in situ. Of the 74 patients with normal cystoscopy, 41 were positive by single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Enhanced Cxbladder-Triage and enhanced Cxbladder-Detect had significantly better specificity than the first-generation Cxbladder tests (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS This study in ethnically diverse patients with hematuria showed the analytical validity of the enhanced Cxbladder tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jay D Raman
- Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Florian Schroeck
- White River Junction Veteran Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Peter Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Scott Asroff
- New Jersey Urology, Mount Laurel Township, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Kian Tai Chong
- Surgi-TEN Specialists, Farrer Park Hospital, Singapore
- PanAsia Surgery, Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, Singapore
| | - Eugene Huang
- Department of Urogynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Hong Liang Chua
- Department of Urogynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Qing Hui Wu
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Siying Yeow
- Department of Urology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
| | - Weida Lau
- Department of Urology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jin Yong
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Molly Eng
- Department of Urology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mertens LS, Claps F, Mayr R, Hodgson A, Shariat SF, Hippe K, Neuzillet Y, Sanders J, Burger M, Pouessel D, Otto W, van der Kwast TH, Lotan Y, Allory Y, Downes MR, van Rhijn BWG. The Search for the Optimal cut-off Value of p53-Immunohistochemistry to Predict Prognosis of Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multi-Center, Multi-Laboratory Analysis. Int J Surg Pathol 2023; 31:157-166. [PMID: 35466737 DOI: 10.1177/10668969221095173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Mutations in the TP53 gene are indicative of worse outcome in bladder cancer and are usually assessed by immunohistochemistry. To define p53-overexpression, a threshold of >10% is most commonly used (cut-off1). Recently, a novel cut-off (aberrant = 0% or ≥50%) (cut-off2) showed better correlation to clinical outcome. In this study, we evaluate the association between p53-immunohistochemistry cut-offs, clinico-pathological variables and disease-specific survival (DSS). Methods: Seven-hundred-fifty chemotherapy-naïve patients who underwent radical cystectomy were included (92% muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In addition to cut-off1 and cut-off2, a third cut-off (cut-off3) was determined based on the highest Youden-index value. Cut-off values were associated with clinico-pathological variables and FGFR3 mutation status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DSS. Results: Aberrant p53-expression was found in 489 (65%) (cut-off1) and 466 (62%) (cut-off2) tumors. Cut-off3 was determined at 25% and aberrant p53-expression in 410 cases (55%) (cutoff3). p53-expression levels were significantly associated with higher pT-stage (cut-off1/2/3: P = 0.047, P = 0.006 and P = 0.0002, respectively), higher grade (all, P < 0.0001), and FGFR3 wild-type (cut-off1: P = 0.02, cut-offs2&3: P = 0.001). Median follow-up was 5.3 years (interquartile range, 4.0-6.0 years). p53-expression was not associated with DSS for any of the three cut-offs (cut-off1/2/3: P-log-rank = 0.566, 0.77 and 0.50, respectively). If we only considered locally advanced bladder cancer, results on DSS remained non-significant. Conclusion: This multi-center, multi-laboratory study showed that, regardless of the cut-off used, p53-immunohistochemistry did not enable selection of patients with worse outcome. Our results suggest that p53-immunohistochemistry alone is not suitable to guide clinical decision making after radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Anjelica Hodgson
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Katrin Hippe
- Dept. Pathology, University Medical Center - Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Hôpital Foch, UVSQ-Paris-Saclay University, Suresnes, France
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - Michelle R Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Taylor JI, Souter LH, Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Raman JD, Lotan Y. Diagnostic Imaging in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microhematuria: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Urol 2023; 209:1099-1106. [PMID: 36883858 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microhematuria is a highly prevalent condition with a low associated risk of urothelial and upper tract malignancy. The AUA Guidelines recently changed recommendations for imaging favoring renal ultrasound for low and intermediate risk patients with microhematuria. We summarize the diagnostic test characteristics of computed tomography urography, renal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance urography in comparison with surgical pathology for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer in microhematuria and gross hematuria patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines from evidence collected for the 2020 AUA Microhematuria Guidelines report, including studies assessing imaging following diagnosis of hematuria published from January 2010 through December 2019. RESULTS The search identified 20 studies which reported the prevalence of malignant and benign diagnoses in relation to imaging modality, of which 6 were included in the quantitative analysis. For the detection of renal cell carcinoma and upper urinary tract carcinoma in patients with microhematuria and gross hematuria, computed tomography urography had a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 84%-98%) and a specificity of 99% (95%CI, 97%-100%) with a certainty of evidence rating of very low and low, respectively when 4 studies were pooled. In comparison, ultrasound demonstrated a sensitivity ranging from 14%-96% (low certainty of evidence) and a specificity of 99%-100% in 2 studies (moderate certainty of evidence), while magnetic resonance urography demonstrated a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 86% in 1 study with a low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS In a limited data set for each individual imaging modality, computed tomography urography appears the most sensitive imaging modality for the diagnostic evaluation of microhematuria. Future studies will be needed to evaluate the clinical and health system financial impacts of the change in guideline recommendations from computed tomography urography to renal ultrasound in evaluating low and intermediate risk patients with microhematuria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob I Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Woldu SL, Labbate C, Murray KS, Rose K, Sexton W, Tachibana I, Kaimakliotis H, Jacob J, Dickstein R, Linehan J, Nieder A, Bjurlin MA, Humphreys M, Ghodoussipour S, Quek ML, O'Donnell M, Eisner BH, Feldman AS, Matin SF, Lotan Y. Early experience with UGN-101 for the treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer - A multicenter evaluation of practice patterns and outcomes. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:147.e15-147.e21. [PMID: 36424224 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND UGN-101 is a novel delivery system for intracavitary treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). UGN-101 was approved based on a pivotal trial for small volume residual low-grade UTUC. Our aim was to report our experience with UGN-101 in a more heterogenous and real-world setting. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all UGN-101 cases from 15 institutions with a focus on practice patterns, efficacy, and adverse effects. We include UGN-101 utilization in both the chemoablative and adjuvant setting. RESULTS There were a total 136 renal units treated from 132 patients. The majority of cases were biopsy proven low-grade UTUC. Practice patterns varied considerably - the most common administration technique was antegrade instillation via a percutaneous nephrostomy. When utilized in the adjuvant setting, 69% of patients were disease free at the time of their first endoscopic evaluation, while in the chemoablative setting, 37% were endoscopically clear on the first evaluation (P < 0.001). Complete response was higher in patients with smaller tumor size prior to UGN-101 induction; low volume (<1 cm) residual disease was associated with a 70% complete response, similar to disease free rate at first endoscopic evaluation when UGN-101 was used in the adjuvant setting. The use of maintenance doses of UGN-101 was reported in 27% of cases. The overall incidence of new onset, clinically significant ureteral stenosis was 23%. CONCLUSIONS This study represents the largest review of patients treated with UGN-101 and can serve as a basis of ongoing hypotheses regarding treatment with UGN-101 for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Craig Labbate
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Joseph Jacob
- State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY
| | - Rian Dickstein
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Chesapeake Urology, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Marc A Bjurlin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Surena F Matin
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gerald T, Margulis V, Meng X, Bagrodia A, Cole S, Qin Q, Call SG, Mauer E, Lotan Y, Woldu SL. Actionable genomic landscapes from a real-world cohort of urothelial carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:148.e17-148.e24. [PMID: 36653279 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent targeted therapies for advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer have generated enthusiasm, but the actionable genomic landscape of early-stage disease remains largely unknown. Here, we utilized a large, real-world cohort to comprehensively investigate the incidence of genetic alterations with potential therapeutic implications at all stages of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from 1,562 bladder cancer patients (stages I-IV) with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor biopsies sequenced using the Tempus xT solid tumor assay. Incidence of genetic alterations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and PD-L1 status were assessed and stratified by bladder cancer stage. For patients with tumor-normal match sequencing (n=966), incidental germline alterations in 50 genes were assessed. RESULTS The cohort was composed of 165 stage I-II, 211 stage III, and 1,186 stage IV tumors. TMB-high, PD-L1 positive, and MSI-high status were noted in 14%, 33%, and 0.7% of tumors, respectively, and were similar across stages. Alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2/3, homologous recombination repair genes, additional DNA repair gene mutations (ERCC2, RB1, FANCC), and NTRK fusions were detected at similar frequencies across disease stages. We identified a low rate of incidental germline mutations in all tumors (5.2%) and in specific genes: MUTYH (1.9%), BRCA2 (0.5%), and ATM (0.8%). CONCLUSIONS Important subsets of patients demonstrate genetic alterations in potentially actionable molecular pathways at all stages. This analysis found minimal variability in these alterations across stages, providing rationale for early identification of genetic alterations and personalization of therapies at all stages for patients with bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Gerald
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Suzanne Cole
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Qian Qin
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Daneshmand S, Zaucha R, Gartrell BA, Lotan Y, Hussain SA, Lee EK, Procopio G, Galanternik F, Naini V, Carcione J, Triantos S, Baig M, Maranchie JK. Phase 2 study of the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients (pts) with intermediate-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC) with FGFR3/2 alterations (alt) in THOR-2: Cohort 3 interim analysis. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
504 Background: Current treatments (tx) of papillary NMIBC are not selective. Novel tx can be assessed on measurable disease (eg, a marker lesion) to rapidly and directly assess antitumor efficacy. FGFR inhibitor therapy may improve outcomes for pts with IR-NMIBC with FGFR3/2alt. Erdafitinib (erda) is an oral selective pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in adults with FGFR3/2alt who have progressed during or following ≥1 line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. THOR-2 (NCT04172675) is a multicohort phase 2 study of erda in pts with NMIBC. We report results in an exploratory cohort of pts with IR-NMIBC with FGFRalt (Cohort 3). Methods: Inclusion: age ≥18 y, with histologically confirmed NMIBC with FGFR3/2alt (local/central testing) and recurrent IR disease, with all previous tumors being low grade (Gr) (Gr 1-2), Ta/T1, no previous carcinoma in situ, risk of progression <5% in the next 2 y, and risk of recurrence >50%. All tumors were removed by transurethral resection of bladder tumor except for a marker lesion (single untouched 5-10 mm lesion). Pts received continuous oral erda 6 mg once daily without uptitration in 28-d cycles. Urine cytology was performed at the time of complete response (CR). Pts with a partial response (PR) or CR ≤3 mos of starting erda continued erda for up to a maximum of 2 y, until progressive disease, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, investigator decision to discontinue tx, or study closure. Primary exploratory end point: CR rate (CR = disappearance of the marker lesion without any new lesions; if there is a remnant of the marker lesion, no viable tumor should be seen on histopathological examination); key secondary end point: safety. Results: As of the data cutoff (Sep 2022) (median follow-up of 6.2 mos), 10/11 enrolled pts have received erda (enrolled population; median age: 66 y [range 47-77]; 9 Ta, 2 not staged). Pts received erda for a median duration of 2.9 mos (range 1.1-8.4). Efficacy (n=8 evaluable): 6 pts had CR (CR rate, 75.0%; 95% CI, 34.9-96.8%), and 1 had PR. Of 7 pts with CR or PR, median observed duration of response was 2.8 mos. Safety (≥1 dose of erda; n=10): the most common tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (90.0%; n=9), diarrhea (60.0%; n=6), dry mouth (50.0%; n=5), dry skin (30.0%; n=3), dysgeusia (30.0%; n=3), and constipation (30.0%; n=3). One pt had Gr ≥3 dysuria (10.0%) and 1 (10.0%) had Gr ≥3 tx-related diarrhea. One pt (10.0%) had Gr 1 tx-related central serous chorioretinopathy. No pts had tx-related serious TEAEs or tx-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation. No deaths occurred. Conclusions: Data from Cohort 3 of THOR-2 demonstrate efficacy in adult pts with IR-NMIBC with FGFRalt. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of erda. Clinical trial information: NCT04172675 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yair Lotan
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, MI, Italy
| | | | - Vahid Naini
- Janssen Research & Development, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | - Mahadi Baig
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Steinberg GD, Kalota SJ, Lotan Y, Warner L, Dauphinee S, Mazanet R. Clinical results of a phase 1 study of intravesical EG-70 in patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
512 Background: enGene is developing non-viral gene therapy platforms to deliver nucleic acids (plasmids) to epithelial mucosal tissues such as urothelium of urinary bladder. EG-70 is a nanoparticle formulation of plasmids that activates both innate and adaptive immune responses to activate the immune system within the bladder. The plasmid encodes both IL-12 and activators of the innate immune receptor RIG-I. EG-70 is administered intravesically to elicit local stimulation of anti-tumor immune responses providing durable efficacy in high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) while avoidingsystemic toxicities. Methods: In the Phase 1 study(LEGEND; NCT04752722), escalating doses of EG-70 were administered intravesically to patients with BCG-unresponsive Carcinoma in situ (CIS) NMIBC on weeks 1 and 2 or weeks 1, 2, 5, 6 of 12-week treatment cycle. At the week 12 assessment, patients with stable disease (SD) or complete response (CR), as assessed by urine cytology, cystoscopy, and bladder biopsy, were allowed electively to remain on EG-70 for up to 3 additional 12-week cycles. Results: To date, 19 patients have been treated. There have been no DLTs. AEs (48 GR1, 17 GR 2 and 1 GR3) have been largely consistent with urinary tract instrumentation, and were not dose related. Eighteen patients have completed one cycle of EG-70, and 67% have achieved CR. Fifteen patients with CR or SD at the end of cycle 1 elected to receive additional treatment cycles (continuation rate of 15/18 ( 83%)). Durable CRs were seen at all dose levels. Patients who receive additional cycles are followed for durability of response (Table). Complete Response. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the safety, tolerability and durable therapeutic potential of intravesical EG-70 in patients with BCG-unresponsive CIS. A Phase 2 study will proceed in 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT04752722 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yair Lotan
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kamat AM, Steinberg GD, Inman BA, Kates MR, Uchio EM, Porten SP, Roupret M, Redorta J, Catto JW, Kulkarni GS, Powles T, Tyson M, Haas GP, Yu Y, Birrenkott M, Lotan Y. Study EV-104: Phase 1 study of intravesical enfortumab vedotin for treatment of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)—Trial in progress. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.tps582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
TPS582 Background: The majority of patients with bladder cancer present with non-muscle invasive disease (Chang 2016; Woldu 2017; Kates 2020; Li 2020). The standard of care for treatment of high risk NMIBC involves transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or chemotherapy. Although the response rate to BCG therapy is high, many patients recur within 1–5 years (Matulay JU 2021). For patients who have BCG unresponsive disease after adequate course of BCG, there are limited options. While radical cystectomy (RC) is still considered the standard of care, most patients are reluctant to undergo RC and their options are limited to intravesical chemotherapy or pembrolizumab. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed to Nectin-4, which is highly expressed in bladder tumors. In EV-301, a phase 3 study, EV showed an OS benefit vs chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who had previously received platinum-based therapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor (Powles NEJM 2021). Based on its demonstrated benefit in la/mUC, EV is currently being evaluated in earlier UC settings. The purpose of this study is to investigate the intravesical administration of EV for patients with NMIBC. Methods: EV-104 (NCT05014139) is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and antitumor activity of intravesical EV in adults with high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC (carcinoma in situ with or without papillary disease) who are ineligible for or refuse RC. The dose escalation part of the trial aims to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose of intravesical EV. The dose expansion part will evaluate patients at the MTD or recommended dose and further characterize safety and antitumor activity of intravesical EV. The study treatment regimen will include an induction phase, where patients will receive intravesical EV weekly for 6 weeks followed by monthly maintenance for a total of 9 additional EV doses. Patients will be assessed for response every 3 months by cystoscopy and urine cytology, while on study. Safety and antitumor activity endpoints will be summarized using descriptive statistics. The study is currently enrolling in the US with additional sites planned in Canada and the EU. Clinical trial information: NCT05014139 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish M. Kamat
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Sima P. Porten
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Joan Redorta
- Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Girish S. Kulkarni
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yair Lotan
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Scovell JM, Stovsky M, Partin A, Lotan Y, Baniel J, Dineen M, Hafron J, Manickam K, Pliskin M, Wagner M, Kestranek A, Klein EA. IsoPSA Performance Characteristics are Unaffected by 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors or Alpha-Blockers: Results From the IsoPSA Validation Study. Urology 2023:S0090-4295(23)00092-4. [PMID: 36804443 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To. determine the impact of 5-α reductase inhibitors or α-blockers on IsoPSA performance for the detection of actionable prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a secondary analysis of data from an institutional review board approved, prospective, multicenter(8-sites) study evaluating IsoPSA in men ≥ 50 years of age with a total PSA ≥ 4 ng/mL with planned prostate biopsy who met previously described inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analytic groups included (i)all subjects, (ii-iii)+/- 5-ARI use, (iv-v)+/- α-blocker use. The performance characteristics of IsoPSA in these groups were assessed by ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity (SP) analysis. RESULTS A total of 1385 men were recruited with 888 men included in final analysis. Actionable prostate cancer, defined as GG2+, was identified in a total of 316 patients with 40 and 217 patients reporting 5-ARI and α-blocker use respectively. Sensitivity to detect both prostate cancer and actionable cancer was similar between patient subsets (P >.05). SP was similar between patients regardless of 5-ARI(P >.05). Increased SP was noted in patients on α-blockers(GG1+: No-α-blocker: 0.360 vs α-blocker: 0.529, P <.05; GG2+: No-α-blocker: 0.40 vs α-blocker: 0.61, P <.05). ROC analysis demonstrates that IsoPSA performance is unaffected by 5-ARI or α-blocker use for prostate cancer and actionable cancer (GG2+) detection. CONCLUSION The performance of IsoPSA for detecting any prostate cancer and clinically actionable prostate cancer is unaffected by commonly used medications (5-ARI and α-blockers) for symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Scovell
- Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Alan Partin
- Johns Hopkins James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jack Baniel
- Rabin Medical Center Department of Urology, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | | | - Jason Hafron
- Michigan Institute of Urology, West Bloomfield, MI
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric A Klein
- Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bezwada D, Lesner NP, Brooks B, Vu HS, Wu Z, Cai L, Kasitinon S, Kelekar S, Cai F, Aurora AB, Patrick M, Leach A, Ghandour R, Zhang Y, Do D, Sudderth J, Dumesnil D, House S, Rosales T, Poole AM, Lotan Y, Woldu S, Bagrodia A, Meng X, Cadeddu JA, Mishra P, Pedrosa I, Kapur P, Courtney KD, Malloy CR, Margulis V, DeBerardinis RJ. Mitochondrial metabolism in primary and metastatic human kidney cancers. bioRxiv 2023:2023.02.06.527285. [PMID: 36798172 PMCID: PMC9934542 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.06.527285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
Most kidney cancers display evidence of metabolic dysfunction1-4 but how this relates to cancer progression in humans is unknown. We used a multidisciplinary approach to infuse 13C-labeled nutrients during surgical tumour resection in over 70 patients with kidney cancer. Labeling from [U-13C]glucose varies across cancer subtypes, indicating that the kidney environment alone cannot account for all metabolic reprogramming in these tumours. Compared to the adjacent kidney, clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC) display suppressed labelling of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates in vivo and in organotypic slices cultured ex vivo, indicating that suppressed labeling is tissue intrinsic. Infusions of [1,2-13C]acetate and [U-13C]glutamine in patients, coupled with respiratory flux of mitochondria isolated from kidney and tumour tissue, reveal primary defects in mitochondrial function in human ccRCC. However, ccRCC metastases unexpectedly have enhanced labeling of TCA cycle intermediates compared to primary ccRCCs, indicating a divergent metabolic program during ccRCC metastasis in patients. In mice, stimulating respiration in ccRCC cells is sufficient to promote metastatic colonization. Altogether, these findings indicate that metabolic properties evolve during human kidney cancer progression, and suggest that mitochondrial respiration may be limiting for ccRCC metastasis but not for ccRCC growth at the site of origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Hieu S. Vu
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
| | - Zheng Wu
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
| | - Ling Cai
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
- Quantitative Biomedical Research Center
| | | | | | - Feng Cai
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Duyen Do
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
| | | | | | - Sara House
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
| | | | - Alan M. Poole
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Prashant Mishra
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Department of Urology
- Department of Radiology
- Kidney Cancer Program
| | - Payal Kapur
- Department of Urology
- Kidney Cancer Program
- Department of Pathology
| | | | - Craig R. Malloy
- Department of Radiology
- Department of Internal Medicine
- Advanced Imaging Research Center
| | | | - Ralph J. DeBerardinis
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute
- Department of Pediatrics
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lotan Y, Baky FJ. Urine-Based Markers for Detection of Urothelial Cancer and for the Management of Non–muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2023; 50:53-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
38
|
Taylor J, Lotan Y. Is Office-based Management of Intermediate-risk Low-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ready For Prime Time? Eur Urol 2023; 83:131-132. [PMID: 36153249 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alsyouf M, Ladi-Seyedian SS, Konety B, Pohar K, Holzbeierlein JM, Kates M, Willard B, Taylor JM, Liao JC, Kaimakliotis HZ, Porten SP, Steinberg GD, Tyson MD, Lotan Y, Daneshmand S. Is a restaging TURBT necessary in high-risk NMIBC if the initial TURBT was performed with blue light? Urol Oncol 2023; 41:109.e9-109.e14. [PMID: 36435710 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether a restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is necessary in high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) if the initial TURBT was performed using blue light (BL) technology. METHODS AND MATERIALS Using the multi-institutional Cysview registry between 2014 and 2021, all consecutive adult patients with known NMIBC (Ta and T1 disease) who underwent TURBT followed by a restaging TURBT within 8 weeks were reviewed. Patients were stratified according to their initial TURBT, BL vs. white light (WL), and compared to determine rates of residual disease and upstaging. Univariate analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS Overall, 115 patients had TURBT for NMIBC followed by a restaging TURBT within 8 weeks and were included in the analysis. Patients who underwent BL compared to WL for their initial TURBT had higher rates of benign pathology on restaging TURBT, although this was not statistically significant (47% vs. 30%; P = 0.08). Of patients with residual tumors on restaging TURBT, there were no differences in rates of Ta (22% vs. 26.5%; P = 0.62), T1 (22% vs. 26.5%; P = 0.62), or CIS (5.5% vs. 13%; P = 0.49) when the initial TURBT was done using BL compared to WL. Rates of upstaging to muscle invasive disease were also not different when initial TURBT was performed using BL compared to WL (3% vs. 4%; P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS TURBT using BL does not reduce rates of residual disease or risk of upstaging on restaging TURBT in Ta or T1 disease. Thus, a restaging TURBT is still necessary even if initial TURBT was performed using BL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhannad Alsyouf
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Max Kates
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Sima P Porten
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Mark D Tyson
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Yair Lotan
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hekman MCH, Wijn SRW, Lotan Y, Govers TM, Witjes JA. Bladder EpiCheck urine test in the follow-up of NMIBC: a cost analysis. World J Urol 2023; 41:471-476. [PMID: 36534153 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04252-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the Netherlands yearly more than 5000 patients are diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). With a specificity of 88.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) for high grade NMIBC of 99.3%, the Bladder EpiCheck (BE) urine test may be used in NMIBC to reduce the burden of follow-up cystoscopies. METHODS In this study a cost analysis of the BE follow-up strategy in the Dutch healthcare system was performed. In half of the follow-up appointments, BE was used as a rule-in for cystoscopy. In addition, the possible delay in recurrence detection was estimated. A cost calculation tool was developed using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS The BE strategy results in an estimated cost reduction of 8%, 4% and 9% in low, intermediate and high risk patients, respectively. In the Netherlands this may result in a cost reduction of approximately 1.6 million euro per year. The estimated delay in the detection of recurrent disease would be 3.9, 1.7 and 1.3 months in low, intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients respectively. CONCLUSION To conclude, the BE can be used to reduce the costs of NMIBC follow-up, with a small delay in diagnosis of recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tim Martin Govers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
von Deimling M, Mertens L, Van Rhijn B, Lotan Y, Spiess P, Daneshmand S, Black P, Pallauf M, D’Andrea D, Moschini M, Soria F, Del Giudice F, Afferi L, Laukhtina E, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Teoh JC, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M, Karakiewicz P, Gontero P, Rink M, Shariat S, Pradere B. Carboplatin induction chemotherapy in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00593-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
42
|
Klotz L, Chin J, Futterer J, Hatiboglu G, Pavlovich C, Koch M, Penson D, Relle J, Raman S, Lotan Y, Serrallach M, Heidenreich A, Oto A, Sedelaar J, Tirkes T, Arora S, Macura K, Costa D, Pantuck A, Bomers J, Bonekamp D, Persigehl T, Clarke G, Eggener S. Four-year follow-up of MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation (TULSA) in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)01004-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
43
|
Chou J, Trepka K, Sjöström M, Egusa EA, Chu CE, Zhu J, Chan E, Gibb EA, Badura ML, Contreras-Sanz A, Stohr BA, Meng MV, Pruthi RS, Lotan Y, Black PC, Porten SP, Koshkin VS, Friedlander TW, Feng FY. TROP2 Expression Across Molecular Subtypes of Urothelial Carcinoma and Enfortumab Vedotin-resistant Cells. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:714-718. [PMID: 35216942 PMCID: PMC10262920 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting TROP2, which has recently been approved for treatment-refractory metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). However, the variability of TROP2 expression across different bladder cancer (BC) subtypes, as well as after enfortumab vedotin (EV) exposure, remains unknown. Using gene expression data from four clinical cohorts with >1400 patient samples of muscle-invasive BC and a BC tissue microarray, we found that TROP2 mRNA and protein are highly expressed across basal, luminal, and stroma-rich subtypes, but depleted in the neuroendocrine subtype. In addition, TROP2 mRNA levels are correlated with NECTIN4 mRNA but are more highly expressed than NECTIN4 mRNA in patient cohorts and BC cell lines. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockdown of TROP2 demonstrates that its expression is one factor governing SG sensitivity. After prolonged EV exposure, cells can downregulate NECTIN4, leading to EV resistance, but retain TROP2 expression and remain sensitive to SG, suggesting nonoverlapping resistance mechanisms to these ADCs. While our findings warrant further validation, they have significant implications for biomarker development, patient selection, and treatment sequencing in the clinic as well as clinical trial design and stratification for metastatic BC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the expression levels of the drug target TROP2 across different molecular subtypes of bladder cancer in multiple patient cohorts and cell lines. We found high levels of TROP2 in most subtypes except in the neuroendocrine subtype. Overall, TROP2 gene expression is higher than NECTIN4 gene expression, and cells resistant to enfortumab vedotin (EV), a NECTIN4-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, remain sensitive to sacituzumab govitecan (SG). Our findings suggest that SG may be effective across most bladder cancer subtypes, including the bladder cancers previously treated with EV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Chou
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Kai Trepka
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Martin Sjöström
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily A Egusa
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Carissa E Chu
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jun Zhu
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily Chan
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ewan A Gibb
- Decipher Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Michelle L Badura
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Bradley A Stohr
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maxwell V Meng
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Raj S Pruthi
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sima P Porten
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Terence W Friedlander
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lobo N, Afferi L, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Porten S, Psutka SP, Gupta S, Smith AB, Williams SB, Lotan Y. Epidemiology, Screening, and Prevention of Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:628-639. [PMID: 36333236 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Bladder cancer (BC) represents a significant health problem due to the potential morbidity and mortality associated with disease burden, which has remained largely unaltered over time. OBJECTIVE To provide an expert collaborative review and describe the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of BC and to evaluate current evidence for BC screening and prevention. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Data on the estimated incidence and mortality of BC for 2020 in 185 countries were derived from the International Agency for Research on Cancer GLOBOCAN database. A review of English-language articles published over the past 5 yr was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE to identify risk factors in addition to contemporary evidence on BC screening and prevention. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS BC is the tenth most common cancer worldwide, with 573 278 cases in 2020. BC incidence is approximately fourfold higher in men than women. Tobacco smoking remains the principal risk factor, accounting for approximately 50% of cases. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine BC screening. However, targeted screening of high-risk individuals (defined according to smoking history or occupational exposure) may reduce BC mortality and should be the focus of prospective randomized trials. In terms of disease prevention, smoking cessation represents the most important intervention, followed by a reduction in exposure to occupational and environmental carcinogens. CONCLUSIONS BC confers a significant disease burden. An understanding of BC epidemiology and risk factors provides an optimal foundation for disease prevention and the care of affected patients. PATIENT SUMMARY Bladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer worldwide and is approximately four times more common among men than among women. The main risk factors are tobacco smoking, followed by exposure to carcinogens in the workplace or the environment. Routine screening is not currently recommended, but may be beneficial in individuals at high risk, such as heavy smokers. Primary prevention is extremely important, and smoking cessation represents the most important action for reducing bladder cancer cases and deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niyati Lobo
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Marco Moschini
- Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sima Porten
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Angela B Smith
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Margulis V, Lotan Y, Aydh A, Shariat SF. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Predicting Upper Urinary Tract Recurrence After Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:317-323. [PMID: 36513557 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
To identify risk factors for upper urinary tract recurrence (UUTR) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC). The PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched on March 2022 to identify relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) statement. We included studies that provided multivariate logistic regression analyses. The pooled UUTR rate was calculated using a fixed effect model. We identified 235 papers, of which seven and 6 articles, comprising a total of 8981 and 8404 UBC patients, were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. Overall, 418 (4.65%) patients were diagnosed with UUTR within a median time of 1.4 to 3.1 years after RC. Risk factors for UUTR were surgical margin (hazard ratio [HR] 3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-4.49, P < .00001), preoperative hydronephrosis (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.25-2.43, P = .001), ureteral margin (HR: 4.34, 95% CI: 2.75-6.85, P < .00001), and pT stage (HR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.37-5.27, P < .004). Incorporation of established risk factors into a clinical prediction model might aid in the decision-making process regarding the intensity and type of surveillance protocols after RC as well as help determine the pretest probability of UUTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Einerhand SMH, Black AJ, Zargar H, Fairey AS, Dinney CP, Mir MC, Krabbe LM, Cookson MS, Jacobson NE, Montgomery JS, Vasdev N, Yu EY, Xylinas E, Kassouf W, Dall'Era MA, Sridhar SS, McGrath JS, Aning J, Shariat SF, Wright JL, Thorpe AC, Morgan TM, Holzbeierlein JM, Bivalacqua TJ, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Grivas P, Garcia JA, Stephenson AJ, Shah JB, Daneshmand S, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Spiess PE, van Rhijn BWG, Black PC, Mertens LS. Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2022; 40:2707-2715. [PMID: 36169695 PMCID: PMC10874219 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04160-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, up to 50% of patients are cisplatin ineligible. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after ≥ 3 cycles of preoperative gemcitabine-carboplatin (gem-carbo) versus gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem-cis). METHODS We identified 1865 patients treated at 19 centers between 2000 and 2013. Patients were included if they had received ≥ 3 cycles of neoadjuvant (cT2-4aN0M0) or induction (cTanyN + M0) gem-carbo or gem-cis followed by RC. RESULTS We included 747 patients treated with gem-carbo (n = 147) or gem-cis (n = 600). Patients treated with gem-carbo had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.016) and more clinically node-positive disease (32% versus 20%; p = 0.013). The complete pathological response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate did not significantly differ between gem-carbo and gem-cis (20.7% versus 22.1%; p = 0.73). Chemotherapeutic regimen was not significantly associated with pCR (OR 0.99 [95%CI 0.61-1.59]; p = 0.96), overall survival (OS) (HR 1.20 [95%CI 0.85-1.67]; p = 0.31), or cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 1.35 [95%CI 0.93-1.96]; p = 0.11). Median OS of patients treated with gem-carbo and gem-cis was 28.6 months (95%CI 18.1-39.1) and 45.1 months (95%CI 32.7-57.6) (p = 0.18), respectively. Median CSS of patients treated with gem-carbo and gem-cis was 28.8 months (95%CI 9.8-47.8) and 71.0 months (95%CI median not reached) (p = 0.02), respectively. Subanalyses of the neoadjuvant and induction setting did not show significant survival differences. CONCLUSION Our results show that a subset of cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC achieve pCR on gem-carbo and that survival outcomes seem comparable to gem-cis provided patients are able to receive ≥ 3 cycles and undergo RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M H Einerhand
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Adrian S Fairey
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria C Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | | | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc A Dall'Era
- Department of Urology, David Medical Center, University of California at David, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan S McGrath
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Jonathan Aning
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew C Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeff M Holzbeierlein
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Scott North
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jorge A Garcia
- Department of Medicine, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, USA
| | | | - Jay B Shah
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
de Jong JJ, Pijpers OM, van Kessel KEM, Boormans JL, Van Criekinge W, Zwarthoff EC, Lotan Y. A Urine-based Genomic Assay Improves Risk Stratification for Patients with High-risk Hematuria Stratified According to the American Urological Association Guidelines. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 6:183-189. [PMID: 36089502 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the recent American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on hematuria, patients are stratified into groups with low, intermediate, and high risk of urothelial carcinoma (UC). These risk groups are based on clinical factors and do not incorporate urine-based tumor markers. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether a urine-based genomic assay improves the redefined AUA risk stratification for hematuria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We selected patients with complete biomarker status, as assessed on urinary DNA, from a previously collected prospective Dutch hematuria cohort (n = 838). Patients were stratified into the AUA risk categories on the basis of sex, age, and type of hematuria. Biomarker status included mutation status for the FGFR3, TERT, and HRAS genes, and methylation status for the OTX1, ONECUT2, and TWIST1 genes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was the diagnostic model performance for different hematuria risk groups. Further analyses assessed the pretest and post-test UC probability in the hematuria subgroups using a Fagan nomogram. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 65 patients (7.8%) were classified as low risk, 106 (12.6%) as intermediate risk, and 667 (79.6%) as high risk. The UC incidence differed significantly between the gross hematuria (21%, 98/457) and microscopic hematuria (4%, 14/381) groups (p < 0.001). All cancer cases were in the high-risk group, which had UC incidence of 16.8% (112/667). Application of the diagnostic model revealed robust performance among all risk groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.929-0.971). Depending on the risk group evaluated, a negative urine assay was associated with post-test UC probability of 0.3-2%, whereas a positive urine assay was associated with post-test UC probability of 31-42%. CONCLUSIONS This study shows the value that a urine-based genomic assay adds to the AUA guideline stratification for patients with hematuria. It seems justified to safely withhold cystoscopy for patients with AUA low risk who have a negative urine assay. In addition, evaluation should be expedited for patients with AUA intermediate or high risk and a positive urine assay. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients who have blood in their urine (hematuria) can be classified as having low, intermediate, or high risk of having cancer in their urinary tract. We found that use of a urine-based genetic test improves the accuracy of predicting which patients are most likely to have cancer. Patients with a negative test may be able to avoid invasive tests, while further tests could be prioritized for patients with a positive test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joep J de Jong
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Urothelial Cancer Research Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Olga M Pijpers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Urothelial Cancer Research Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim E M van Kessel
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Urothelial Cancer Research Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Urothelial Cancer Research Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Van Criekinge
- Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ellen C Zwarthoff
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Klein EA, Partin A, Lotan Y, Baniel J, Dineen M, Hafron J, Manickam K, Pliskin M, Wagner M, Kestranek A, Stovsky M. Clinical validation of IsoPSA, a single parameter, structure-focused assay for improved detection of prostate cancer: A prospective, multicenter study. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:408.e9-408.e18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
49
|
Grivas P, Agarwal P, Al-Ahmadie H, Friedlander T, Geynisman D, Hussain I, Lotan Y, Morgans A, Tesic-Schnell M, Meeks J. 1775P Prevalence of PD-L1 high expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): Results from the PREVAIL prospective cohort study. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
50
|
Bhanvadia RR, Baky FJ, Ashbrook CQ, Lotan Y, Woldu SL. Pathologic fracture in metastatic kidney cancer: Identifying widening disparities and opportunity for quality improvement. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:384.e1-384.e8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|