Development and Multicenter Case-Control Validation of Urinary Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis, Surveillance, and Risk-Prediction

PURPOSE

Urinary comprehensive genomic profiling (uCGP) uses next-generation sequencing to identify mutations associated with urothelial carcinoma and has the potential to improve patient outcomes by noninvasively diagnosing disease, predicting grade and stage, and estimating recurrence risk.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This is a multicenter case-control study using banked urine specimens collected from patients undergoing initial diagnosis/hematuria workup or urothelial carcinoma surveillance. A total of 581 samples were analyzed by uCGP: 333 for disease classification and grading algorithm development, and 248 for blinded validation. uCGP testing was done using the UroAmp platform, which identifies five classes of mutation: single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variants, small insertion-deletions, copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, and aneuploidy. UroAmp algorithms predicting urothelial carcinoma tumor presence, grade, and recurrence risk were compared with cytology, cystoscopy, and pathology.

RESULTS

uCGP algorithms had a validation sensitivity/specificity of 95%/90% for initial cancer diagnosis in patients with hematuria and demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. A positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 9.2 and a negative DLR of 0.05 demonstrate the ability to risk-stratify patients presenting with hematuria. In surveillance patients, binary urothelial carcinoma classification demonstrated an NPV of 91%. uCGP recurrence-risk prediction significantly prognosticated future recurrence (hazard ratio, 6.2), whereas clinical risk factors did not. uCGP demonstrated positive predictive value (PPV) comparable with cytology (45% vs. 42%) with much higher sensitivity (79% vs. 25%). Finally, molecular grade predictions had a PPV of 88% and a specificity of 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

uCGP enables noninvasive, accurate urothelial carcinoma diagnosis and risk stratification in both hematuria and urothelial carcinoma surveillance patients.

T-cell adoptive immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility and toxicity of the adoptive transfer of ex vivo-activated T lymphocytes that have been sensitized to autologous tumor vaccine in vivo.

METHODS

Twenty patients with extensive metastatic renal cell carcinoma received systemic adoptive immunotherapy with autologous T cells in the absence of conjunctional interleukin-2 (IL-2) administration. Patients were vaccinated intradermally with irradiated autologous tumor cells and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant to stimulate an immune response. Inguinal lymph nodes draining the vaccine site were surgically removed, and the cells were stimulated with staphylococcal enterotoxin A followed by expansion in 60 IU/mL IL-2, and in some cases additionally stimulated with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody and IL-2, to obtain a large number of cells.

RESULTS

The staphylococcal enterotoxin A/IL-2 activation induced vigorous proliferation of T cells (median expansion 26-fold) that were a mixture of CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes. Activated cells were infused intravenously at doses ranging from 2x10(9) to 9.5x10(10). There was minimal toxicity consisting of grade 1 or 2 fever and nausea, and the entire treatment was delivered as outpatient therapy. One patient had a partial response, one had a mixed response, and 8 had stable disease lasting at least 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoptive transfer of ex vivo-activated, tumor vaccine-primed lymph node cells is feasible and is associated with minimal toxicity when used alone. These results warrant further study in a Phase II trial.