1
|
Vittone J, Gill D, Goldsmith A, Klein EA, Karlitz JJ. A multi-cancer early detection blood test using machine learning detects early-stage cancers lacking USPSTF-recommended screening. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:91. [PMID: 38632333 PMCID: PMC11024170 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00568-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend single-cancer screening for select cancers (e.g., breast, cervical, colorectal, lung). Advances in genome sequencing and machine learning have facilitated the development of blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests intended to complement single-cancer screening. MCED tests can interrogate circulating cell-free DNA to detect a shared cancer signal across multiple tumor types. We report real-world experience with an MCED test that detected cancer signals in three individuals subsequently diagnosed with cancers of the ovary, kidney, and head/neck that lack USPSTF-recommended screening. These cases illustrate the potential of MCED tests to detect early-stage cancers amenable to cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Gill
- Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shain DH, Klein EA. Genome assembly of Pseudomonas sp. strain SED1 T, a psychrotolerant bacterium isolated from Deception Glacier (Washington, USA). Microbiol Resour Announc 2024; 13:e0012524. [PMID: 38526093 PMCID: PMC11008169 DOI: 10.1128/mra.00125-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Strain SED1T was isolated from glacial samples collected on Mount Deception, Washington, USA. Genome sequencing and assembly identified a DNA G + C content of 60.4 mol% with 6,125 predicted proteins. Analysis by the Type Strain Genome Server is consistent with the isolate representing a previously undescribed species in the genus Pseudomonas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H. Shain
- Biology Department, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Biology Department, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Uchendu CG, Guan Z, Klein EA. Spatial organization of bacterial sphingolipid synthesis enzymes. J Biol Chem 2024:107276. [PMID: 38588805 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Sphingolipids are produced by nearly all eukaryotes where they play significant roles in cellular processes such as cell growth, division, programmed cell death, angiogenesis, and inflammation. While it was previously believed that sphingolipids were quite rare among bacteria, bioinformatic analysis of the recently identified bacterial sphingolipid synthesis genes suggests that these lipids are likely to be produced by a wide range of microbial species. The sphingolipid synthesis pathway consists of three critical enzymes. Serine palmitoyltransferase catalyzes the condensation of serine with palmitoyl-CoA (or palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein), ceramide synthase adds the second acyl chain, and a reductase reduces the ketone present on the long-chain base. While there is general agreement regarding the identity of these bacterial enzymes, the precise mechanism and order of chemical reactions for microbial sphingolipid synthesis is more ambiguous. Two mechanisms have been proposed. First, the synthesis pathway may follow the well characterized eukaryotic pathway in which the long-chain base is reduced prior to the addition of the second acyl chain. Alternatively, our previous work suggests that addition of the second acyl chain precedes the reduction of the long-chain base. To distinguish between these two models, we investigated the subcellular localization of these three key enzymes. We found that serine palmitoyltransferase and ceramide synthase are localized to the cytoplasm whereas the ceramide reductase is in the periplasmic space. This is consistent with our previously proposed model wherein the second acyl chain is added in the cytoplasm prior to export to the periplasm where the lipid molecule is reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chioma G Uchendu
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
| | - Ziqiang Guan
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Eric A Klein
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA; Biology Department, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klein EA. Editorial Comment. J Urol 2024; 211:391. [PMID: 38329054 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003811.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raoof S, Klein EA. Further Discussion Regarding Multicancer Early Detection Tests. Am Fam Physician 2024; 109:104. [PMID: 38393815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
|
6
|
Rawat C, Ben-Salem S, Singh N, Chauhan G, Rabljenovic A, Vaghela V, Venkadakrishnan VB, Macdonald JD, Dahiya UR, Ghanem Y, Bachour S, Su Y, DePriest AD, Lee S, Muldong M, Kim HT, Kumari S, Valenzuela MM, Zhang D, Hu Q, Cortes Gomez E, Dehm SM, Zoubeidi A, Jamieson CAM, Nicolas M, McKenney J, Willard B, Klein EA, Magi-Galluzzi C, Stauffer SR, Liu S, Heemers HV. Prostate Cancer Progression Relies on the Mitotic Kinase Citron Kinase. Cancer Res 2023; 83:4142-4160. [PMID: 37801613 PMCID: PMC10841833 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in men in Western cultures. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which prostate cancer cells divide to support tumor growth could help devise strategies to overcome treatment resistance and improve survival. Here, we identified that the mitotic AGC family protein kinase citron kinase (CIT) is a pivotal regulator of prostate cancer growth that mediates prostate cancer cell interphase progression. Increased CIT expression correlated with prostate cancer growth induction and aggressive prostate cancer progression, and CIT was overexpressed in prostate cancer compared with benign prostate tissue. CIT overexpression was controlled by an E2F2-Skp2-p27 signaling axis and conferred resistance to androgen-targeted treatment strategies. The effects of CIT relied entirely on its kinase activity. Conversely, CIT silencing inhibited the growth of cell lines and xenografts representing different stages of prostate cancer progression and treatment resistance but did not affect benign epithelial prostate cells or nonprostatic normal cells, indicating a potential therapeutic window for CIT inhibition. CIT kinase activity was identified as druggable and was potently inhibited by the multikinase inhibitor OTS-167, which decreased the proliferation of treatment-resistant prostate cancer cells and patient-derived organoids. Isolation of the in vivo CIT substrates identified proteins involved in diverse cellular functions ranging from proliferation to alternative splicing events that are enriched in treatment-resistant prostate cancer. These findings provide insights into the regulation of aggressive prostate cancer cell behavior by CIT and identify CIT as a functionally diverse and druggable driver of prostate cancer progression. SIGNIFICANCE The poorly characterized protein kinase citron kinase is a therapeutic target in prostate cancer that drives tumor growth by regulating diverse substrates, which control several hallmarks of aggressive prostate cancer progression. See related commentary by Mishra et al., p. 4008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chitra Rawat
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Salma Ben-Salem
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nidhi Singh
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gaurav Chauhan
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Vishwa Vaghela
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Varadha Balaji Venkadakrishnan
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Ujjwal R Dahiya
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yara Ghanem
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Salam Bachour
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yixue Su
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Adam D DePriest
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Sanghee Lee
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Hyun-Tae Kim
- Department of Urology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangeeta Kumari
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Dingxiao Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Hunan University, Changsa, China
| | - Qiang Hu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Eduardo Cortes Gomez
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Scott M Dehm
- Masonic Cancer Center and Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Amina Zoubeidi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Marlo Nicolas
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jesse McKenney
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Eric A Klein
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Shaun R Stauffer
- Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Song Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang A, Shen J, Rodriguez AA, Saunders EJ, Chen F, Janivara R, Darst BF, Sheng X, Xu Y, Chou AJ, Benlloch S, Dadaev T, Brook MN, Plym A, Sahimi A, Hoffman TJ, Takahashi A, Matsuda K, Momozawa Y, Fujita M, Laisk T, Figuerêdo J, Muir K, Ito S, Liu X, Uchio Y, Kubo M, Kamatani Y, Lophatananon A, Wan P, Andrews C, Lori A, Choudhury PP, Schleutker J, Tammela TL, Sipeky C, Auvinen A, Giles GG, Southey MC, MacInnis RJ, Cybulski C, Wokolorczyk D, Lubinski J, Rentsch CT, Cho K, Mcmahon BH, Neal DE, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Martin RM, Nordestgaard BG, Nielsen SF, Weischer M, Bojesen SE, Røder A, Stroomberg HV, Batra J, Chambers S, Horvath L, Clements JA, Tilly W, Risbridger GP, Gronberg H, Aly M, Szulkin R, Eklund M, Nordstrom T, Pashayan N, Dunning AM, Ghoussaini M, Travis RC, Key TJ, Riboli E, Park JY, Sellers TA, Lin HY, Albanes D, Weinstein S, Cook MB, Mucci LA, Giovannucci E, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Penney KL, Turman C, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Thompson IM, Hamilton RJ, Fleshner NE, Finelli A, Parent MÉ, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Koutros S, Beane Freeman LE, Stampfer M, Wolk A, Håkansson N, Andriole GL, Hoover RN, Machiela MJ, Sørensen KD, Borre M, Blot WJ, Zheng W, Yeboah ED, Mensah JE, Lu YJ, Zhang HW, Feng N, Mao X, Wu Y, Zhao SC, Sun Z, Thibodeau SN, McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, West CM, Barnett G, Maier C, Schnoeller T, Luedeke M, Kibel AS, Drake BF, Cussenot O, Cancel-Tassin G, Menegaux F, Truong T, Koudou YA, John EM, Grindedal EM, Maehle L, Khaw KT, Ingles SA, Stern MC, Vega A, Gómez-Caamaño A, Fachal L, Rosenstein BS, Kerns SL, Ostrer H, Teixeira MR, Paulo P, Brandão A, Watya S, Lubwama A, Bensen JT, Butler EN, Mohler JL, Taylor JA, Kogevinas M, Dierssen-Sotos T, Castaño-Vinyals G, Cannon-Albright L, Teerlink CC, Huff CD, Pilie P, Yu Y, Bohlender RJ, Gu J, Strom SS, Multigner L, Blanchet P, Brureau L, Kaneva R, Slavov C, Mitev V, Leach RJ, Brenner H, Chen X, Holleczek B, Schöttker B, Klein EA, Hsing AW, Kittles RA, Murphy AB, Logothetis CJ, Kim J, Neuhausen SL, Steele L, Ding YC, Isaacs WB, Nemesure B, Hennis AJ, Carpten J, Pandha H, Michael A, Ruyck KD, Meerleer GD, Ost P, Xu J, Razack A, Lim J, Teo SH, Newcomb LF, Lin DW, Fowke JH, Neslund-Dudas CM, Rybicki BA, Gamulin M, Lessel D, Kulis T, Usmani N, Abraham A, Singhal S, Parliament M, Claessens F, Joniau S, den Broeck TV, Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao JE, Martinez ME, Larkin S, Townsend PA, Aukim-Hastie C, Bush WS, Aldrich MC, Crawford DC, Srivastava S, Cullen J, Petrovics G, Casey G, Wang Y, Tettey Y, Lachance J, Tang W, Biritwum RB, Adjei AA, Tay E, Truelove A, Niwa S, Yamoah K, Govindasami K, Chokkalingam AP, Keaton JM, Hellwege JN, Clark PE, Jalloh M, Gueye SM, Niang L, Ogunbiyi O, Shittu O, Amodu O, Adebiyi AO, Aisuodionoe-Shadrach OI, Ajibola HO, Jamda MA, Oluwole OP, Nwegbu M, Adusei B, Mante S, Darkwa-Abrahams A, Diop H, Gundell SM, Roobol MJ, Jenster G, van Schaik RH, Hu JJ, Sanderson M, Kachuri L, Varma R, McKean-Cowdin R, Torres M, Preuss MH, Loos RJ, Zawistowski M, Zöllner S, Lu Z, Van Den Eeden SK, Easton DF, Ambs S, Edwards TL, Mägi R, Rebbeck TR, Fritsche L, Chanock SJ, Berndt SI, Wiklund F, Nakagawa H, Witte JS, Gaziano JM, Justice AC, Mancuso N, Terao C, Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Madduri RK, Conti DV, Haiman CA. Characterizing prostate cancer risk through multi-ancestry genome-wide discovery of 187 novel risk variants. Nat Genet 2023; 55:2065-2074. [PMID: 37945903 PMCID: PMC10841479 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The transferability and clinical value of genetic risk scores (GRSs) across populations remain limited due to an imbalance in genetic studies across ancestrally diverse populations. Here we conducted a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of 156,319 prostate cancer cases and 788,443 controls of European, African, Asian and Hispanic men, reflecting a 57% increase in the number of non-European cases over previous prostate cancer genome-wide association studies. We identified 187 novel risk variants for prostate cancer, increasing the total number of risk variants to 451. An externally replicated multi-ancestry GRS was associated with risk that ranged from 1.8 (per standard deviation) in African ancestry men to 2.2 in European ancestry men. The GRS was associated with a greater risk of aggressive versus non-aggressive disease in men of African ancestry (P = 0.03). Our study presents novel prostate cancer susceptibility loci and a GRS with effective risk stratification across ancestry groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anqi Wang
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jiayi Shen
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Fei Chen
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rohini Janivara
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Burcu F. Darst
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Xin Sheng
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yili Xu
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alisha J. Chou
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sara Benlloch
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Anna Plym
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ali Sahimi
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Thomas J. Hoffman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Atushi Takahashi
- Laboratory for Statistical Analysis, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Genomic Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Suita, Japan
| | - Koichi Matsuda
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Laboratory of Clinical Genome Sequencing,Graduate school of Frontier Sciences,The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihide Momozawa
- Laboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center of Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masashi Fujita
- Laboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center of Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Triin Laisk
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Jéssica Figuerêdo
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shuji Ito
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Xiaoxi Liu
- Laboratory for Statistical and Translational Genetics, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan
| | - The Biobank Japan Project
- Corresponding Author: Christopher A. Haiman, Harlyne J. Norris Cancer Research Tower, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1450 Biggy Street, Rm 1504, Los Angeles, CA 90033 or
| | - Yuji Uchio
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Michiaki Kubo
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Kamatani
- Laboratory for Statistical and Translational Genetics, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - Peggy Wan
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Caroline Andrews
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences,Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adriana Lori
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA
| | | | - Johanna Schleutker
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Medical Genetics, Genomics, Laboratory Division, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Csilla Sipeky
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Unit of Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert J. MacInnis
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Dominika Wokolorczyk
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Christopher T. Rentsch
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kelly Cho
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David E. Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
- University of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Faculty of Medical Science, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard M. Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Borge G. Nordestgaard
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sune F. Nielsen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maren Weischer
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Røder
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hein V. Stroomberg
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jyotsna Batra
- Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Qld, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Lisa Horvath
- Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (COBLH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Sydney, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Judith A. Clements
- Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Qld, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Wayne Tilly
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Gail P. Risbridger
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Translational Research Program, Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Henrik Gronberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Markus Aly
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Robert Szulkin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- SDS Life Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Nordstrom
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nora Pashayan
- University College London, Department of Applied Health Research, London, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maya Ghoussaini
- Open Targets, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Saffron Walden, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ruth C. Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim J. Key
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jong Y. Park
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Thomas A. Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hui-Yi Lin
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Demetrius Albanes
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Weinstein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael B. Cook
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH,, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lorelei A. Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara Lindstrom
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David J. Hunter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kathryn L. Penney
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Constance Turman
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine M. Tangen
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Phyllis J. Goodman
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ian M. Thompson
- CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital – Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robert J. Hamilton
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Dept. of Surgery (Urology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neil E. Fleshner
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marie-Élise Parent
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Laval, QC, Canada
| | - Janet L. Stanford
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elaine A. Ostrander
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stella Koutros
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Laura E. Beane Freeman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Meir Stampfer
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gerald L. Andriole
- Brady Urological Institute in National Capital Region, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert N. Hoover
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mitchell J. Machiela
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William J. Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - James E. Mensah
- University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | - Yong-Jie Lu
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Ninghan Feng
- Wuxi Second Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangzhu Province, China
| | - Xueying Mao
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK
| | - Yudong Wu
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, The Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shan-Chao Zhao
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zan Sun
- The People’s Hospital of Liaoning Proviouce, The People’s Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China, Shenyang, China
| | - Stephen N. Thibodeau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Daniel J. Schaid
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catharine M.L. West
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gill Barnett
- University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Olivier Cussenot
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- CeRePP, Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Menegaux
- Exposome and Heredity, CESP (UMR 1018), Paris-Saclay Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Exposome and Heredity, CESP (UMR 1018), Paris-Saclay Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Yves Akoli Koudou
- Cancer & Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif Cédex, France
| | - Esther M. John
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute,Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Lovise Maehle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- Clinical Gerontology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sue A. Ingles
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mariana C Stern
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Laura Fachal
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Spain
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Barry S. Rosenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah L. Kerns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harry Ostrer
- Professor of Pathology and Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Manuel R. Teixeira
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Paula Paulo
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andreia Brandão
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Jeannette T. Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ebonee N. Butler
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - James L. Mohler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jack A. Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Manolis Kogevinas
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- University of Cantabria-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Gemma Castaño-Vinyals
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisa Cannon-Albright
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Craig C. Teerlink
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Chad D. Huff
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Pilie
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan J. Bohlender
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jian Gu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sara S. Strom
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luc Multigner
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Rennes, France
| | - Pascal Blanchet
- CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Laurent Brureau
- CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Radka Kaneva
- Molecular Medicine Center, Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Chavdar Slavov
- Department of Urology and Alexandrovska University Hospital, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Vanio Mitev
- Molecular Medicine Center, Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Robin J. Leach
- Department of Cell Systems and Anatomy and Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xuechen Chen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Ben Schöttker
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ann W. Hsing
- Department of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Adam B. Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher J. Logothetis
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeri Kim
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Linda Steele
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - William B. Isaacs
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Barbara Nemesure
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Anselm J.M. Hennis
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Chronic Disease Research Centre and Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados
| | - John Carpten
- Department of Translational Genomics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Kim De Ruyck
- Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care and Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Azad Razack
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jasmine Lim
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia (CRM), Outpatient Centre, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Lisa F. Newcomb
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel W. Lin
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay H. Fowke
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Epidemiology,The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Benjamin A. Rybicki
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Marija Gamulin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Urogenital Unit, Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Davor Lessel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomislav Kulis
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nawaid Usmani
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aswin Abraham
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sandeep Singhal
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew Parliament
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frank Claessens
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Van den Broeck
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Genomic Medicine Group, Galician Foundation of Genomic Medicine, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Servicio Galego de Saúde, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jose Esteban Castelao
- Genetic Oncology Unit, CHUVI Hospital, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Galicia Sur (IISGS), Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Samantha Larkin
- Scientific Education Support, Thames Ditton, Surrey, Formerly Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul A. Townsend
- School of Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK
| | | | - William S. Bush
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melinda C. Aldrich
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dana C. Crawford
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shiv Srivastava
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, Center for Prostate Disease Research,Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gyorgy Petrovics
- Department of Surgery, Center for Prostate Disease Research,Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Public Health Science, Center for Public Health Genomics,University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA
| | - Yao Tettey
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
- Department of Pathology, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Joseph Lachance
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Wei Tang
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Andrew A. Adjei
- Department of Pathology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Evelyn Tay
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Jacob M. Keaton
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jacklyn N. Hellwege
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Peter E. Clark
- Atrium Health/Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Olufemi Ogunbiyi
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Olayiwola Shittu
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and Univerity College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Olukemi Amodu
- Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Akindele O. Adebiyi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oseremen I. Aisuodionoe-Shadrach
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Hafees O. Ajibola
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Mustapha A. Jamda
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Olabode P. Oluwole
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Maxwell Nwegbu
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | - Halimatou Diop
- Laboratoires Bacteriologie et Virologie, Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Susan M. Gundell
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monique J. Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Guido Jenster
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ron H.N. van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennifer J. Hu
- The University of Miami School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Maureen Sanderson
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Linda Kachuri
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rohit Varma
- Southern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Roberta McKean-Cowdin
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mina Torres
- Southern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael H. Preuss
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruth J.F. Loos
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Zawistowski
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sebastian Zöllner
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Zeyun Lu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Douglas F. Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology,, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefan Ambs
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Todd L. Edwards
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Reedik Mägi
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Timothy R. Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lars Fritsche
- Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Stephen J. Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sonja I. Berndt
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Fredrik Wiklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hidewaki Nakagawa
- Laboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center of Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - John S. Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
- Departments of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - J. Michael Gaziano
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nick Mancuso
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chikashi Terao
- Laboratory for Statistical and Translational Genetics, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan
- Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
- The Department of Applied Genetics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - David V. Conti
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang ET, Hubbell E, Klein EA. Multicancer Early Detection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:3464. [PMID: 37031713 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Earl Hubbell
- Medical Affairs, Grail, LLC, Menlo Park, California
| | - Eric A Klein
- Medical Affairs, Grail, LLC, Menlo Park, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ganguly S, Lone Z, Muskara A, Imamura J, Hardaway A, Patel M, Berk M, Smile TD, Davicioni E, Stephans KL, Ciezki J, Weight CJ, Gupta S, Reddy CA, Tendulkar RD, Chakraborty AA, Klein EA, Sharifi N, Mian OY. Intratumoral androgen biosynthesis associated with 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 promotes resistance to radiotherapy in prostate cancer. J Clin Invest 2023; 133:e165718. [PMID: 37966114 PMCID: PMC10645386 DOI: 10.1172/jci165718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Half of all men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) inherit at least 1 copy of an adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 (1245C) allele, which increases levels of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 (3βHSD1) and promotes intracellular androgen biosynthesis. Germline inheritance of the adrenally permissive allele confers worse outcomes in men with advanced PCa. We investigated whether HSD3B1 (1245C) drives resistance to combined androgen deprivation and radiotherapy. Adrenally permissive 3βHSD1 enhanced resistance to radiotherapy in PCa cell lines and xenograft models engineered to mimic the human adrenal/gonadal axis during androgen deprivation. The allele-specific effects on radiosensitivity were dependent on availability of DHEA, the substrate for 3βHSD1. In lines expressing the HSD3B1 (1245C) allele, enhanced expression of DNA damage response (DDR) genes and more rapid DNA double-strand break (DSB) resolution were observed. A correlation between androgen receptor (AR) expression and increased DDR gene expression was confirmed in 680 radical prostatectomy specimens. Treatment with the nonsteroidal antiandrogen enzalutamide reversed the resistant phenotype of HSD3B1 (1245C) PCa in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, 3βHSD1 promotes prostate cancer resistance to combined androgen deprivation and radiotherapy by upregulating DNA DSB repair. This work supports prospective validation of early combined androgen blockade for high-risk men harboring the HSD3B1 (1245C) allele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zaeem Lone
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research
| | | | | | | | - Mona Patel
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Mike Berk
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Kevin L Stephans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jay Ciezki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Rahul D Tendulkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Abhishek A Chakraborty
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric A Klein
- Veracyte Inc., San Francisco, California, USA
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Ohio, USA
| | - Omar Y Mian
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research
- Department of Radiation Oncology, and Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schrag D, Beer TM, McDonnell CH, Nadauld L, Dilaveri CA, Reid R, Marinac CR, Chung KC, Lopatin M, Fung ET, Klein EA. Blood-based tests for multicancer early detection (PATHFINDER): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2023; 402:1251-1260. [PMID: 37805216 PMCID: PMC11027492 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01700-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multicancer early detection (MCED) blood tests can detect a cancer signal from circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). PATHFINDER was a prospective cohort study investigating the feasibility of MCED testing for cancer screening. METHODS In this prospective cohort study done in oncology and primary care outpatient clinics at seven US health networks, a convenience sample of adults aged 50 years or older without signs or symptoms of cancer consented to MCED testing. We collected blood, analysed cfDNA, and returned results to participants' doctors. If a methylation signature indicative of cancer was detected, predicted cancer signal origin(s) informed diagnostic assessment. The primary outcome was time to, and extent of, diagnostic testing required to confirm the presence or absence of cancer. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04241796, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Dec 12, 2019, and Dec 4, 2020, we recruited 6662 participants. 4204 (63·5%) of 6621 participants with analysable results were women, 2417 (36·5%) were men, and 6071 (91·7%) were White. A cancer signal was detected in 92 (1·4%) of 6621 participants with analysable results. 35 (38%) participants were diagnosed with cancer (true positives) and 57 (62%) had no cancer diagnosis (false positives). Excluding two participants whose diagnostic assessments began before MCED test results were reported, median time to diagnostic resolution was 79 days (IQR 37-219): 57 days (33-143) in true-positive and 162 days (44-248) in false-positive participants. Most participants had both laboratory tests (26 [79%] of 33 with true-positive results and 50 [88%] of 57 with false-positive results) and imaging (30 [91%] of 33 with true-positive results and 53 [93%] of 57 with false-positive results). Fewer procedures were done in participants with false-positive results (17 [30%] of 57) than true-positive results (27 [82%] of 33) and few had surgery (one with a false-positive result and three with a true-positive result). INTERPRETATION This study supports the feasibility of MCED screening for cancer and underscores the need for further research investigating the test's clinical utility. FUNDING GRAIL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deb Schrag
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert Reid
- US Oncology Research, VA Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alyamani M, Michael P, Hettel D, Thomas L, Lundy SD, Berk M, Patel M, Li J, Rashidi H, McKenney JK, Klein EA, Sharifi N. Elevated periprostatic venous testosterone correlates with prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Invest 2023; 133:e171117. [PMID: 37655657 PMCID: PMC10471166 DOI: 10.1172/jci171117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDGenerally, clinical assessment of gonadal testosterone (T) in human physiology is determined using concentrations measured in peripheral blood. Prostatic T exposure is similarly thought to be determined from peripheral T exposure. Despite the fact that androgens drive prostate cancer, peripheral T has had no role in the clinical evaluation or treatment of men with localized prostate cancer.METHODSTo assess the role of local androgen delivery in prostate cancer, we obtained blood from the (periprostatic) prostatic dorsal venous complex in 266 men undergoing radical prostatectomy from July 2014 to August 2021 and compared dorsal T (DT) levels with those in circulating peripheral blood (PT) and prostatic tissue. Comprehensive targeted steroid analysis and unbiased metabolomics analyses were performed. The association between the DT/PT ratio and progression-free survival after prostatectomy was assessed.RESULTSSurprisingly, in some men, DT levels were enriched several-fold compared with PT levels. For example, 20% of men had local T concentrations that were at least 2-fold higher than peripheral T concentrations. Isocaproic acid, a byproduct of androgen biosynthesis, and 17-OH-progesterone, a marker of intratesticular T, were also enriched in the dorsal vein of these men, consistent with testicular shunting. Men with enriched DT had higher rates of prostate cancer recurrence. DT/PT concentration ratios predicted worse outcomes even when accounting for known clinical predictors.CONCLUSIONSThese data suggest that a large proportion of men have a previously unappreciated exposure to an undiluted and highly concentrated T supply. Elevated periprostatic T exposure was associated with worse clinical outcomes after radical prostatectomy.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH grants R01CA172382, R01CA236780, R01CA261995, R01CA249279, and R50CA251961; US Army Medical Research and Development Command grants W81XWH2010137 and W81XWH-22-1-0082.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Alyamani
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Patrick Michael
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
| | - Daniel Hettel
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
| | - Lewis Thomas
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
| | - Scott D. Lundy
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
| | - Mike Berk
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Mona Patel
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Jianbo Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Hooman Rashidi
- Department of Pathology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, and
| | - Jesse K. McKenney
- Department of Pathology, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, and
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Klein EA, Madhavan S, Beer TM, Bettegowda C, Liu MC, Hartman AR, Hackshaw A. Dying To Find Out: The Cost of Time at the Dawn of the Multicancer Early Detection Era. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1003-1010. [PMID: 37255363 PMCID: PMC10390858 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-1275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a significant burden worldwide that adversely impacts life expectancy, quality of life, health care costs, and workforce productivity. Although currently recommended screening tests for individual cancers reduce mortality, they detect only a minority of all cancers and sacrifice specificity for high sensitivity, resulting in a high cumulative rate of false positives. Blood-based multicancer early detection tests (MCED) based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) and other technologies hold promise for broadening the number of cancer types detected in screened populations and hope for reducing cancer mortality. The promise of this new technology to improve cancer detection rates and make screening more efficient at the population level demands the development of novel trial designs that accelerate clinical adoption. Carefully designed clinical trials are needed to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A. Klein
- GRAIL, Inc, and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Tomasz M. Beer
- Exact Sciences Corporation and OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bryce AH, Thiel DD, Seiden MV, Richards D, Luan Y, Coignet M, Zhang Q, Zhang N, Hubbell E, Kurtzman KN, Klein EA. Performance of a Cell-Free DNA-Based Multi-cancer Detection Test in Individuals Presenting With Symptoms Suspicious for Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200679. [PMID: 37467458 PMCID: PMC10581635 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A multi-cancer detection test using a targeted methylation assay and machine learning classifiers was validated and optimized for screening in prospective, case-controlled Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02889978) substudy 3. Here, we report test performance in a subgroup of participants with symptoms suspicious for cancer to assess the test's ability to potentially facilitate efficient diagnostic evaluation in symptomatic individuals. METHODS We evaluated test performance (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of cancer signal origin [CSO] prediction accuracy) in participants with clinically presenting cancers (CPCs) and noncancer with underlying medical conditions and among two subgroups (65 years and older and GI cancers). Overall survival (OS) of participants who had a cancer signal detected/not detected was compared with SEER-based expected survival. RESULTS A total of 2,036 cancer and 1,472 noncancer participants were included. Specificity was high in all noncancer participants (99.5% [95% CI, 98.4 to 99.8]). In participants with CPCs, the overall sensitivity was 64.3% (95% CI, 62.2 to 66.4) and the overall accuracy of CSO prediction in true positives was 90.3%. For GI cancers, the overall sensitivity was 84.1% (95% CI, 80.6 to 87.1). In participants 65 years and older, test performance was similar to that of all participants. Individuals with cancers not detected had a significantly better OS than that expected from SEER (P < .01). CONCLUSION This test detected a cancer signal with high specificity and CSO prediction accuracy and moderate sensitivity in symptomatic individuals, with especially high performance in participants with GI cancers. The survival analysis implied that the cancers not detected were less clinically aggressive than cancers detected by the test, providing prognostic insights to physicians. This multi-cancer detection test could facilitate efficient workup and stratify cancer risk in symptomatic individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric A. Klein
- GRAIL, LLC, Menlo Park, CA
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen F, Madduri RK, Rodriguez AA, Darst BF, Chou A, Sheng X, Wang A, Shen J, Saunders EJ, Rhie SK, Bensen JT, Ingles SA, Kittles RA, Strom SS, Rybicki BA, Nemesure B, Isaacs WB, Stanford JL, Zheng W, Sanderson M, John EM, Park JY, Xu J, Wang Y, Berndt SI, Huff CD, Yeboah ED, Tettey Y, Lachance J, Tang W, Rentsch CT, Cho K, Mcmahon BH, Biritwum RB, Adjei AA, Tay E, Truelove A, Niwa S, Sellers TA, Yamoah K, Murphy AB, Crawford DC, Patel AV, Bush WS, Aldrich MC, Cussenot O, Petrovics G, Cullen J, Neslund-Dudas CM, Stern MC, Kote-Jarai Z, Govindasami K, Cook MB, Chokkalingam AP, Hsing AW, Goodman PJ, Hoffmann TJ, Drake BF, Hu JJ, Keaton JM, Hellwege JN, Clark PE, Jalloh M, Gueye SM, Niang L, Ogunbiyi O, Idowu MO, Popoola O, Adebiyi AO, Aisuodionoe-Shadrach OI, Ajibola HO, Jamda MA, Oluwole OP, Nwegbu M, Adusei B, Mante S, Darkwa-Abrahams A, Mensah JE, Diop H, Van Den Eeden SK, Blanchet P, Fowke JH, Casey G, Hennis AJ, Lubwama A, Thompson IM, Leach R, Easton DF, Preuss MH, Loos RJ, Gundell SM, Wan P, Mohler JL, Fontham ET, Smith GJ, Taylor JA, Srivastava S, Eeles RA, Carpten JD, Kibel AS, Multigner L, Parent MÉ, Menegaux F, Cancel-Tassin G, Klein EA, Andrews C, Rebbeck TR, Brureau L, Ambs S, Edwards TL, Watya S, Chanock SJ, Witte JS, Blot WJ, Michael Gaziano J, Justice AC, Conti DV, Haiman CA. Evidence of Novel Susceptibility Variants for Prostate Cancer and a Multiancestry Polygenic Risk Score Associated with Aggressive Disease in Men of African Ancestry. Eur Urol 2023; 84:13-21. [PMID: 36872133 PMCID: PMC10424812 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic factors play an important role in prostate cancer (PCa) susceptibility. OBJECTIVE To discover common genetic variants contributing to the risk of PCa in men of African ancestry. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a meta-analysis of ten genome-wide association studies consisting of 19378 cases and 61620 controls of African ancestry. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Common genotyped and imputed variants were tested for their association with PCa risk. Novel susceptibility loci were identified and incorporated into a multiancestry polygenic risk score (PRS). The PRS was evaluated for associations with PCa risk and disease aggressiveness. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Nine novel susceptibility loci for PCa were identified, of which seven were only found or substantially more common in men of African ancestry, including an African-specific stop-gain variant in the prostate-specific gene anoctamin 7 (ANO7). A multiancestry PRS of 278 risk variants conferred strong associations with PCa risk in African ancestry studies (odds ratios [ORs] >3 and >5 for men in the top PRS decile and percentile, respectively). More importantly, compared with men in the 40-60% PRS category, men in the top PRS decile had a significantly higher risk of aggressive PCa (OR = 1.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.10-1.38, p = 4.4 × 10-4). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the importance of large-scale genetic studies in men of African ancestry for a better understanding of PCa susceptibility in this high-risk population and suggests a potential clinical utility of PRS in differentiating between the risks of developing aggressive and nonaggressive disease in men of African ancestry. PATIENT SUMMARY In this large genetic study in men of African ancestry, we discovered nine novel prostate cancer (PCa) risk variants. We also showed that a multiancestry polygenic risk score was effective in stratifying PCa risk, and was able to differentiate risk of aggressive and nonaggressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Chen
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Burcu F Darst
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alisha Chou
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xin Sheng
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anqi Wang
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jiayi Shen
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Suhn K Rhie
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sue A Ingles
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rick A Kittles
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sara S Strom
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin A Rybicki
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Barbara Nemesure
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - William B Isaacs
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Janet L Stanford
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Maureen Sanderson
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jong Y Park
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care and Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA
| | - Sonja I Berndt
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chad D Huff
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Yao Tettey
- Department of Pathology, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana; Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | - Joseph Lachance
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Wei Tang
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher T Rentsch
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kelly Cho
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin H Mcmahon
- Theoretical Biology Division, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, USA
| | | | - Andrew A Adjei
- Department of Pathology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Evelyn Tay
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | - Thomas A Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dana C Crawford
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA
| | - William S Bush
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melinda C Aldrich
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology and Predictive Onco-Urology Group, Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP-Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; CeRePP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Gyorgy Petrovics
- Department of Surgery, Center for Prostate Disease Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, Center for Prostate Disease Research, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Mariana C Stern
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Michael B Cook
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Ann W Hsing
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Phyllis J Goodman
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Thomas J Hoffmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bettina F Drake
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer J Hu
- The University of Miami School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jacob M Keaton
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jacklyn N Hellwege
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Peter E Clark
- Atrium Health/Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Olufemi Ogunbiyi
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Michael O Idowu
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Olufemi Popoola
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Akindele O Adebiyi
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oseremen I Aisuodionoe-Shadrach
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Hafees O Ajibola
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Mustapha A Jamda
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Olabode P Oluwole
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Maxwell Nwegbu
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | | | - Halimatou Diop
- Laboratoires Bacteriologie et Virologie, Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Stephen K Van Den Eeden
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA; Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pascal Blanchet
- CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Jay H Fowke
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Public Health Science, Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Anselm J Hennis
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | - Ian M Thompson
- CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Medical Center Hospital, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robin Leach
- Department of Urology, Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael H Preuss
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruth J Loos
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan M Gundell
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peggy Wan
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James L Mohler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth T Fontham
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Gary J Smith
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Shiv Srivastava
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rosaline A Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John D Carpten
- Department of Translational Genomics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luc Multigner
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Rennes, France
| | - Marie-Élise Parent
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Laval, QC, Canada
| | - Florence Menegaux
- Cancer & Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif Cédex, France; Paris-Sud University, Villejuif Cédex, France
| | - Geraldine Cancel-Tassin
- Department of Urology and Predictive Onco-Urology Group, Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP-Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; CeRePP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Eric A Klein
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Caroline Andrews
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laurent Brureau
- CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Stefan Ambs
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Todd L Edwards
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John S Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - William J Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy C Justice
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - David V Conti
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dhakephalkar T, Stukey G, Guan Z, Carman GM, Klein EA. Characterization of an evolutionarily distinct bacterial ceramide kinase from Caulobacter crescentus. J Biol Chem 2023:104894. [PMID: 37286040 PMCID: PMC10331486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
A common feature among nearly all Gram-negative bacteria is the requirement for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the outer leaflet of the outer membrane. LPS provides structural integrity to the bacterial membrane which aids bacteria in maintaining their shape and acts as a barrier from environmental stress and harmful substances such as detergents and antibiotics. Recent work has demonstrated that Caulobacter crescentus can survive without LPS due to the presence of the anionic sphingolipid ceramide-phosphoglycerate. Based on genetic evidence, we predicted that protein CpgB functions as a ceramide kinase and performs the first step in generating the phosphoglycerate head group. Here, we characterized the kinase activity of recombinantly expressed CpgB and demonstrated that it can phosphorylate ceramide to form ceramide 1-phosphate. The pH optimum for CpgB was 7.5, and the enzyme required Mg2+ as a cofactor. Mn2+, but not other divalent cations, could substitute for Mg2+. Under these conditions, the enzyme exhibited typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics with respect to NBD-C6-ceramide (Km,app=19.2 ± 5.5 μM; Vmax,app=2590 ± 230 pmol/min/mg enzyme) and ATP (Km,app=0.29 ± 0.07 mM; Vmax,app=10100 ± 996 pmol/min/mg enzyme). Phylogenetic analysis of CpgB revealed that CpgB belongs to a new class of ceramide kinases which is distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart; furthermore, the pharmacological inhibitor of human ceramide kinase (NVP-231) had no effect on CpgB. The characterization of a new bacterial ceramide kinase opens avenues for understanding the structure and function of the various microbial phosphorylated sphingolipids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Geordan Stukey
- Department of Food Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, New Jersey Institute for Food Nutrition and Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Ziqiang Guan
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - George M Carman
- Department of Food Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, New Jersey Institute for Food Nutrition and Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Eric A Klein
- Biology Department, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA; Department of Food Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, New Jersey Institute for Food Nutrition and Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Benidir T, Lone Z, Wood A, Abdallah N, Campbell R, Bajic P, Purysko A, Nguyen JK, Kaouk J, Haber GP, Eltemamy M, Stein R, Haywood S, Klein EA, Almassi N, Campbell SC, Abouassaly R, Weight CJ. Using IsoPSA With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score May Help Refine Biopsy Decision Making in Patients With Elevated PSA. Urology 2023; 176:115-120. [PMID: 36965817 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess how IsoPSA, a structure-based serum assay which has been prospectively validated in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), can help the biopsy decision process when combined with the prostate imaging reporting and data systems (PI-RADS). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients receiving IsoPSA testing for elevated PSA (>4.0ng/mL). Patients were included if they had received an IsoPSA test and prostate MRI within 1 year of IsoPSA testing, and subsequently underwent prostate biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of (csPCa, ie, GG ≥ 2) on biopsy. Predictive probabilities for csPCa at biopsy were generated using IsoPSA and various PI-RADS scores. RESULTS Two hundred and 7 patients were included. Twenty-two percent had csPCa. Elevated IsoPSA ratio (defined as ≥6.0) (OR: 5.06, P = .015) and a PI-RADS 4-5 (OR: 6.37, P <.001) were significant predictors of csPCa. The combination of elevated IsoPSA ratio and PI-RADS 4-5 lesion had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (AUC: 0.83, P <.001). The predicted probability of csPCa when a patient had a negative or equivocal MRI (PI-RADS 1-3) and a low IsoPSA ratio (≤6) was <5%. CONCLUSION The combination of PI-RADS with IsoPSA ratios may help refine the biopsy decision-making process. In our cohort, a negative or equivocal MRI with a low IsoPSA may provide a low enough predicted probability to omit biopsy in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Benidir
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Zaeem Lone
- School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Andrew Wood
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nour Abdallah
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Rebecca Campbell
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Petar Bajic
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Andrei Purysko
- Department of Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH
| | - Jane K Nguyen
- Department of Pathology, Robert J. Tomisch Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Mohamed Eltemamy
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert Stein
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Samuel Haywood
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Eric A Klein
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nima Almassi
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Steven C Campbell
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert Abouassaly
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thrombosis is one of the main complications in cancer patients often leading to mortality. However, the mechanisms underlying platelet hyperactivation are poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS Murine and human platelets were isolated and treated with small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) from various cancer cell lines. We demonstrate that platelets very effectively take up sEVs from aggressive prostate cancer cells. The process of uptake is fast, proceeds effectively in circulation in mice, and is mediated by the abundant sEV-membrane protein-CD63. The uptake of cancer-sEVs leads to the accumulation of cancer cell-specific RNA in platelets in vitro and in vivo. The human prostate cancer-sEV-specific RNA marker PCA3 is detected in platelets of ~70% of prostate cancer patients. This was markedly reduced after prostatectomy. In vitro studies showed that platelet uptake of cancer-sEVs induces strong platelet activation in a CD63-RPTPα (receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha)-dependent manner. In contrast to physiological agonists ADP and thrombin, sEVs activate platelets via a noncanonical mechanism dependent upon active translation. Intravital studies demonstrated accelerated thrombosis both in murine tumor models and in mice that received intravenous injections of cancer-sEVs. The prothrombotic effects of sEVs were rescued by blocking CD63. CONCLUSIONS Tumors communicate with platelets by means of sEVs, which deliver cancer markers and activate platelets in a CD63-dependent manner leading to thrombosis. This emphasizes the diagnostic and prognostic value of platelet-associated cancer markers and identifies new pathways for intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejasvi Dudiki
- Departments of Neurosciences, Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (T.D., M.V., I.Z., S.B., P.F., E.A.P., T.V.B.)
| | - Manoj Veleeparambil
- Departments of Neurosciences, Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (T.D., M.V., I.Z., S.B., P.F., E.A.P., T.V.B.)
| | - Irina Zhevlakova
- Departments of Neurosciences, Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (T.D., M.V., I.Z., S.B., P.F., E.A.P., T.V.B.)
| | - Sudipta Biswas
- Departments of Neurosciences, Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (T.D., M.V., I.Z., S.B., P.F., E.A.P., T.V.B.)
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Education Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (E.A.K.)
| | - Peter Ford
- Departments of Neurosciences, Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (T.D., M.V., I.Z., S.B., P.F., E.A.P., T.V.B.)
| | - Eugene A Podrez
- Departments of Neurosciences, Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (T.D., M.V., I.Z., S.B., P.F., E.A.P., T.V.B.)
| | - Tatiana V Byzova
- Departments of Neurosciences, Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (T.D., M.V., I.Z., S.B., P.F., E.A.P., T.V.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dhakephalkar T, Stukey G, Guan Z, Carman GM, Klein EA. Characterization of an evolutionarily distinct bacterial ceramide kinase from Caulobacter crescentus. bioRxiv 2023:2023.05.01.538943. [PMID: 37205603 PMCID: PMC10187206 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.01.538943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
A common feature among nearly all Gram-negative bacteria is the requirement for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the outer leaflet of the outer membrane. LPS provides structural integrity to the bacterial membrane which aids bacteria in maintaining their shape and acts as a barrier from environmental stress and harmful substances such as detergents and antibiotics. Recent work has demonstrated that Caulobacter crescentus can survive without LPS due to the presence of the anionic sphingolipid ceramide-phosphoglycerate. Based on genetic evidence, we predicted that protein CpgB functions as a ceramide kinase and performs the first step in generating the phosphoglycerate head group. Here, we characterized the kinase activity of recombinantly expressed CpgB and demonstrated that it can phosphorylate ceramide to form ceramide 1-phosphate. The pH optimum for CpgB was 7.5, and the enzyme required Mg 2+ as a cofactor. Mn 2+ , but not other divalent cations, could substitute for Mg 2+ . Under these conditions, the enzyme exhibited typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics with respect to NBD-C6-ceramide (K m,app =19.2 ± 5.5 μM; V max,app =2586.29 ± 231.99 pmol/min/mg enzyme) and ATP (K m,app =0.29 ± 0.07 mM; V max,app =10067.57 ± 996.85 pmol/min/mg enzyme). Phylogenetic analysis of CpgB revealed that CpgB belongs to a new class of ceramide kinases which is distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart; furthermore, the pharmacological inhibitor of human ceramide kinase (NVP-231) had no effect on CpgB. The characterization of a new bacterial ceramide kinase opens avenues for understanding the structure and function of the various microbial phosphorylated sphingolipids.
Collapse
|
19
|
Benidir T, Lone Z, Nguyen JK, Ward R, Hofmann M, Klein EA, Mian OY, Weight CJ, Purysko AS. The combination of prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring system and a genomic classifier is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220663. [PMID: 36745009 PMCID: PMC10078867 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) portends an unfavorable prognosis in prostate cancer patients. Conventional and advanced imaging remains limited in its ability to detect PLNM. We sought to evaluate the combination of a genomic classifier Decipher with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores in improving the detection of PLNM. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of patients whom underwent RP, Decipher analysis, and pre-operative prostate MRI. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-squareχ2 tests. Quantitative variables were assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of PLNM on final pathology. RESULTS In total, 202 patients were included in the analysis, 23 of whom (11%) had PLNM. Patients with PLNM had higher median Decipher scores (0.73) than those without PLNM (0.61; p = 0.003). Patients with PLNM were more likely to demonstrate PI-RADS scores ≥ 4 (96%) than those without PLNM (74%; p = 0.012). Logistic regression demonstrated an interaction between Decipher score with PI-RADS score ≥4 (OR = 20.41; 95% CI, 2.10-198.74; p = 0.009) The combination demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63-0.82; p < 0.001) for predicting PLNM. CONCLUSION The combination of elevated Decipher genomic score (≥ 0.6) and clinically significant PI-RADS score (≥ 4) is associated with PLNM at the time of RP in a modern high-risk cohort of patients with PCaprostate cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Prostate MRI and genomic testing may help identify patients with adverse pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Benidir
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Zaeem Lone
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jane K Nguyen
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Robert J. Tomisch Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA
| | - Ryan Ward
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Martin Hofmann
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Omar Y Mian
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher J Weight
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Klein EA. Mrs Hattie Jones. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2446-2447. [PMID: 36854066 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Klein
- Stanford University Distinguished Careers Institute, Palo Alto, CA.,Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Benidir T, Lone ZM, Abdallah N, Wood A, Campbell R, Purysko A, Nguyen J, Klein EA, Abouassaly R, Campbell S, Weight CJ. Use of IsoPSA with prostate MRI PIRADS score in biopsy decision making in patients with elevated PSA. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
388 Background: IsoPSA is prospectively validated to be superior to PSA and percent free PSA in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) as well as clinically significant prostate cancer. We sought to evaluate the use of IsoPSA in combination with prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the prostate imaging reporting and data systems (PIRADS) on predicting either benign/indolent or csPCA at biopsy. Methods: This was a single center retrospective review of prospectively collected patient data that included all patients who underwent IsoPSA testing, preoperative prostate MRI and prostate biopsy from 2019-2021. Chi Squared analysis was used to assess for associations between a binary classification of low (<6) or elevated (>6) IsoPSA index, in combination with PIRADS scores in predicting either indolent/benign or csPCa at biopsy. Logistic regression was used to explore independent predictors of csPCa. Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was completed with areas under the curve (AUC) for IsoPSA and PIRADS scores, both alone and in combination. Predictive probabilities were assessed using combinations of IsoPSA thresholds and PIRADS scores. Results: 207 patients met inclusion criteria. Among patients with a negative MRI, low IsoPSA index was associated with a lower chance of csPCa compared to those with elevated IsoPSA (2% vs 15%, p<0.018). For those with a PIRADS 4-5 lesion, elevated IsoPSA index was associated with a higher chance of csPCa at biopsy compared to a low IsoPSA index (49% vs 19%, p=0.05). On multivariate analysis, elevated IsoPSA and PIRADS 4-5 were independent predictors of csPCa (p<0.001). Similarly, low IsoPSA index and negative MRI were independent predictors of benign/indolent disease at biopsy (p<0.001). Using predictive probabilities, the combination of PIRADS 4-5 with elevated IsoPSA was associated with the highest risk of csPCa (48%) and the highest AUC (0.83) for predicting csPCa. This AUC value was superior to either marker alone (0.76, 0.76) and total PSA alone (0.57) (p<0.001). Conclusions: The combination of elevated IsoPSA with adverse PIRADS score (4-5) is associated with a 48% predicted probability of csPCa at biopsy with an AUC of 0.83, which was more accurate than either marker alone. A low IsoPSA in combination with a negative MRI resulted in a 98% chance of benign/indolent disease at biopsy. These findings may prove useful for the practicing Urologist and may help guide discussions regarding the need for biopsy when interpreting various IsoPSA/PIRADS combinations. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Benidir
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zaeem M Lone
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Andrew Wood
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Rebecca Campbell
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Jane Nguyen
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Robert Abouassaly
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Steven Campbell
- Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sharifi N, McKay RR, Vinson J, Royal MA, Lang JM, Klein EA, Li X, Berk M, Goins C, Alyamani M, Chung YM, Wang C, Patel M, Rathi N, Zhu Z, Willard B, Stauffer S. BMX inhibition and HSD3B1-driven resistance in prostate cancer in the Maverick trial. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
144 Background: Kinase inhibitors have been ineffective in prostate cancer and have no known role in androgen biosynthesis. Inheritance of the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1(1245C) allele encodes a 3βHSD1 enzyme missense that up-regulates the rate-limiting step of androgen biosynthesis from non-gonadal precursor steroids and confers poor clinical outcomes in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). About half of all men with prostate cancer inherit the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele. Multiple clinical studies demonstrate that adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele inheritance confers more rapid progression on ADT and others also suggest worse CRPC outcomes even after treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide. However, there is no known method to clinically block 3βHSD1. Furthermore, 3βHSD1 is not known to be phosphorylated. Methods: Mass spectrometry was used to identify protein phosphorylation sites and steroid metabolites, genetic and pharmacologic methods were used to identify the kinase required for 3βHSD1 phosphorylation and mouse xenograft studies were performed with BMX inhibition. The identified mechanism was used to design and launch a multicenter phase 2 study of the BMX inhibitor abivertinib in combination with abiraterone in men with metastatic CRPC. Results: 3βHSD1 enzyme activity requires tyrosine phosphorylation at Y344 by the BMX kinase. Androgen biosynthesis is blocked by a phosphorylation-defective 3βHSD1 344F, or BMX genetic knockdown, or BMX pharmacologic inhibition. BMX inhibition using zanubrutinib suppresses CRPC growth in the C4-2 and VCaP xenograft models by blocking intratumoral androgen synthesis and tumor androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Discovery of this mechanism provides the rationale for the phase 2 Maverick trial of abivertinib, a BMX inhibitor, combined with abiraterone, in men with CRPC with adrenal-permissive HSD3B1 allele inheritance (NCT05361915). Eligibility includes 1) presence of metastatic CRPC, 2) measurable and/or non-measurable disease, and 3) confirmed positivity of adrenal-permissive HSD3B1(1245C) allele inheritance via central testing (cap heterozygosity at 50%). Patients will be enrolled in 2 arms: 1) abiraterone naïve (n=45) and 2) abiraterone progressing (n=55). All patients will receive treatment with abivertinib 200mg twice daily with abiraterone 1000mg daily and prednisone 5mg by mouth twice daily. The primary outcome is 6-month radiographic progression-free survival. On-treatment biopsies will be used to inform mechanisms of response and resistance in patients. Conclusions: BMX is required for 3βHSD1 phosphorylation, androgen biosynthesis and CRPC progression with the adrenal-permissive HSD3B1(1245C) allele. The Maverick trial will test clinical proof-of-concept of BMX inhibition in men with adrenal-permissive HSD3B1(1245C) inheritance. Clinical trial information: NCT05361915 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Sharifi
- GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Jake Vinson
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mona Patel
- GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abdallah N, Benidir T, Lone ZM, Zhang A, Wood A, Curry C, Haywood S, Kaouk J, Abouassaly R, Klein EA, Weight CJ. The natural progression of patients with an IsoPSA value and its predictive ability of clinically significant prostate cancer on biopsy. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
325 Background: IsoPSA is a structure-based serum assay exploring the spectrum of possible prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms. It was shown to outperform total and percent-free PSA in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (grade group (GG) ≥2 on biopsy). IsoPSA reduced unnecessary biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We sought to compare the outcomes of eventual biopsy and imaging of surveilled patients with an initially normal or high IsoPSA, thus assessing IsoPSA’s prospective predictive ability of csPCa. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent IsoPSA testing from 2017-present. Data was dichotomized into patients with normal (≤6) and high IsoPSA (>6). We collected the outcomes of any consequent IsoPSA and PSA test, prostate biopsy and MRI. We calculated the statistical IsoPSA’s characteristics for the prediction of csPCa on biopsy. Results: The median follow-up time of 811 patients who underwent IsoPSA testing was 18 months (IQR, 16.5-20). Among 443 patients with initial low IsoPSA, 5 (1.1%) had a csPCa on a subsequent biopsy, 19 (4.3%) subsequent high IsoPSA, 122 (27.5%) rising PSA, and 22 (5%) csPCa on MRI. Among 368 patients with initial high IsoPSA, 105 (28.5%) had a csPCa on a subsequent biopsy and 106 (28.8%) on an MRI. The sensitivity of IsoPSA to predict csPCa was 95.5%, and the NPV was 94.8%. Among 124 patients with high IsoPSA and initial negative biopsy, 110 had a subsequent negative and 14 a positive biopsy (10GG1 (8.1%), 4 ≥GG2 (3.2%)), with a respective median IsoPSA of 7.2 and 9.6 (p=0.007). An IsoPSA>10 generated an OR of csPCa of 7.2 (95%CI 2.1-25.2, p=0.0005). Conclusions: In 18-month follow-up, 1.1% of patients with normal IsoPSA developed csPCa compared to 28.5% of patients with high IsoPSA. In the cohort of patients with high IsoPSA and initially negative biopsy, 3.2% eventually developed csPCa, however, having a significantly higher IsoPSA than those who remained negative. The odds of having csPCa were 7 times higher with IsoPSA>10. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tarik Benidir
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zaeem M Lone
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Andrew Wood
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Robert Abouassaly
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Scovell JM, Stovsky M, Partin A, Lotan Y, Baniel J, Dineen M, Hafron J, Manickam K, Pliskin M, Wagner M, Kestranek A, Klein EA. IsoPSA Performance Characteristics are Unaffected by 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors or Alpha-Blockers: Results From the IsoPSA Validation Study. Urology 2023:S0090-4295(23)00092-4. [PMID: 36804443 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To. determine the impact of 5-α reductase inhibitors or α-blockers on IsoPSA performance for the detection of actionable prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a secondary analysis of data from an institutional review board approved, prospective, multicenter(8-sites) study evaluating IsoPSA in men ≥ 50 years of age with a total PSA ≥ 4 ng/mL with planned prostate biopsy who met previously described inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analytic groups included (i)all subjects, (ii-iii)+/- 5-ARI use, (iv-v)+/- α-blocker use. The performance characteristics of IsoPSA in these groups were assessed by ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity (SP) analysis. RESULTS A total of 1385 men were recruited with 888 men included in final analysis. Actionable prostate cancer, defined as GG2+, was identified in a total of 316 patients with 40 and 217 patients reporting 5-ARI and α-blocker use respectively. Sensitivity to detect both prostate cancer and actionable cancer was similar between patient subsets (P >.05). SP was similar between patients regardless of 5-ARI(P >.05). Increased SP was noted in patients on α-blockers(GG1+: No-α-blocker: 0.360 vs α-blocker: 0.529, P <.05; GG2+: No-α-blocker: 0.40 vs α-blocker: 0.61, P <.05). ROC analysis demonstrates that IsoPSA performance is unaffected by 5-ARI or α-blocker use for prostate cancer and actionable cancer (GG2+) detection. CONCLUSION The performance of IsoPSA for detecting any prostate cancer and clinically actionable prostate cancer is unaffected by commonly used medications (5-ARI and α-blockers) for symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Scovell
- Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Alan Partin
- Johns Hopkins James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Jack Baniel
- Rabin Medical Center Department of Urology, Petah Tikvah, Israel
| | | | - Jason Hafron
- Michigan Institute of Urology, West Bloomfield, MI
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric A Klein
- Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Benidir T, Austhof E, Ward RD, Ream J, Bullen J, Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Giganti F, Klein EA, Purysko AS. Impact of Prostate Urethral Lift Device on Prostate Magnetic Resonance Image Quality. J Urol 2023; 209:101097JU0000000000003156. [PMID: 36630568 PMCID: PMC10786202 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostatic urethral lift with UroLift is a minimally invasive approach to treat symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy. This device causes artifacts on prostate magnetic resonance images. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of artifact on prostate magnetic resonance image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a single-center retrospective review of patients with UroLift who subsequently had prostate magnetic resonance imaging. Two readers graded UroLift artifact on each pulse sequence using a 5-point scale (1-nondiagnostic; 5-no artifact). Prostate Imaging Quality scores were assigned for the whole data set. The volume of gland obscured by artifact was measured. Linear and logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of poor image quality. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients were included. Poor image quality occurs more in the transition zone than the peripheral zone (15% vs 3%), at base/mid regions vs the apex (13%, 9%, and 5%, respectively) and on diffusion-weighted images vs T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (27%, 0.3%, 0%, respectively; P < .001). Suboptimal image quality (ie, Prostate Imaging Quality score <2) was found in 16%-24% of exams. The percentage of gland obscured by the UroLift artifact was higher on diffusion-weighted images and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences than T2-weighted (32%, 9%, and 6%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS UroLift artifact negatively affects prostate magnetic resonance image quality with greater impact in the mid-basal transition zone, obscuring a third of the gland on diffusion-weighted images. Patients considering this procedure should be counseled on the impact of this device on image quality and its potential implications for any image-guided prostate cancer workup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Benidir
- Glickman Urological Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ethan Austhof
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ryan D. Ward
- Abdominal Imaging Section, Imaging Institute, Cleveland
Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justin Ream
- Abdominal Imaging Section, Imaging Institute, Cleveland
Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jenifer Bullen
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Peter A. Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital
NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science,
University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrei S. Purysko
- Glickman Urological Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, Ohio
- Abdominal Imaging Section, Imaging Institute, Cleveland
Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jamshidi A, Liu MC, Klein EA, Venn O, Hubbell E, Beausang JF, Gross S, Melton C, Fields AP, Liu Q, Zhang N, Fung ET, Kurtzman KN, Amini H, Betts C, Civello D, Freese P, Calef R, Davydov K, Fayzullina S, Hou C, Jiang R, Jung B, Tang S, Demas V, Newman J, Sakarya O, Scott E, Shenoy A, Shojaee S, Steffen KK, Nicula V, Chien TC, Bagaria S, Hunkapiller N, Desai M, Dong Z, Richards DA, Yeatman TJ, Cohn AL, Thiel DD, Berry DA, Tummala MK, McIntyre K, Sekeres MA, Bryce A, Aravanis AM, Seiden MV, Swanton C. Evaluation of cell-free DNA approaches for multi-cancer early detection. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:1537-1549.e12. [PMID: 36400018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
In the Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (NCT02889978) substudy 1, we evaluate several approaches for a circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test by defining clinical limit of detection (LOD) based on circulating tumor allele fraction (cTAF), enabling performance comparisons. Among 10 machine-learning classifiers trained on the same samples and independently validated, when evaluated at 98% specificity, those using whole-genome (WG) methylation, single nucleotide variants with paired white blood cell background removal, and combined scores from classifiers evaluated in this study show the highest cancer signal detection sensitivities. Compared with clinical stage and tumor type, cTAF is a more significant predictor of classifier performance and may more closely reflect tumor biology. Clinical LODs mirror relative sensitivities for all approaches. The WG methylation feature best predicts cancer signal origin. WG methylation is the most promising technology for MCED and informs development of a targeted methylation MCED test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Minetta C Liu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nan Zhang
- GRAIL, LLC, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhao Dong
- GRAIL, LLC, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | | - Timothy J Yeatman
- Gibbs Cancer Center and Research Institute, Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Allen L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO 80218, USA
| | - David D Thiel
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Donald A Berry
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Charles Swanton
- Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, London, WC1E 6DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lone Z, Benidir T, Rainey M, Nair M, Davicioni E, Gibb EA, Williamson S, Gupta S, Chaim Ornstein M, Tendulkar R, Weight C, Nguyen JK, Klein EA, Mian OY. Transcriptomic Features of Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1575-1582. [PMID: 35662504 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cribriform (CF) and/or intraductal carcinoma (IDC) are associated with more aggressive prostate cancer (CaP) and worse outcomes. OBJECTIVE The transcriptomic features that typify CF/IDC are not well described and the capacity for clinically utilized genomic classifiers to improve risk modeling for CF/IDC remains undefined. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a retrospective review of CaP patients who had Decipher testing at a single high-volume institution. Index lesions from radical prostatectomy specimens were identified by genitourinary pathologists who simultaneously reviewed prostatectomy specimens for the presence of CF and IDC features. Patients were grouped based on pathologic features, specifically the absence of CF/IDC (CF-/IDC-), CF positive only (CF+/IDC-), and CF/IDC positive (CF+/IDC+). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Clinical, pathologic, and genomic categorical variables were assessed using the Pearson chi-square test, while quantitative variables were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of high-risk Decipher scores (>0.60). A gene set enrichment analysis was performed to identify genes and gene networks associated with CF/IDC status. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 463 patients were included. Patients who were CF+/IDC+ had the highest Decipher risk scores (CF+/IDC+: 0.79 vs CF+/IDC-: 0.71 vs CF-/IDC-: 0.56, p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression, predictors of high-risk Decipher scores included the presence of CF, both alone (CF+/IDC-; odds ratio [OR]: 5.45, p < 0.001) or in combination with positive IDC status (CF+/IDC+; OR: 6.87, p < 0.001). On the gene set enrichment analysis, MYC pathway upregulation was significantly enriched in tumor samples from CF/IDC-positive patients (normalized enrichment score [NES]: 1.65, p = 0.046). Other enriched pathways included E2F targets (NES: 1.69, p = 0.031) and oxidative phosphorylation (NES: 1.68, =0 .033). CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series identifying an association between a clinically validated genomic classifier and the presence of CF and IDC at radical prostatectomy. Tumors with CF and intraductal features were associated with aggressive transcriptomic signatures. PATIENT SUMMARY Genomic-based tests are becoming readily available for the management of prostate cancer. We observed that Decipher, a commonly used genomic test in prostate cancer, correlates with unfavorable features in tissue specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaeem Lone
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Tarik Benidir
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Monica Nair
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Sean Williamson
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Pathology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Rahul Tendulkar
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Christopher Weight
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jane K Nguyen
- Cleveland Clinic Department of Pathology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Omar Y Mian
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA; Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Klein EA, Partin A, Lotan Y, Baniel J, Dineen M, Hafron J, Manickam K, Pliskin M, Wagner M, Kestranek A, Stovsky M. Clinical validation of IsoPSA, a single parameter, structure-focused assay for improved detection of prostate cancer: A prospective, multicenter study. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:408.e9-408.e18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
29
|
Klein EA. UROLOGY welcomes the Society of Women in Urology. Urology 2022; 168:10. [PMID: 36049629 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Klein
- Editor in Chief. https://twitter.com/EricKleinMD
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Callejas MF, Klein EA, Truong M, Thomas L, McKenney JK, Ghai S. Detection of clinically significant index prostate cancer using micro-ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy. Urology 2022; 169:150-155. [PMID: 35843353 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) index lesion using high resolution transrectal micro-ultrasound (MicroUS) applying PRI-MUS (Prostate Risk Identification using Micro Ultrasound) score v1.0. METHODS Men who underwent radical prostatectomy following biopsy and MicroUS assessment were included. MicroUS dynamic cine loops of these patients were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced radiologist. The radiologist was aware that patients had undergone radical prostatectomy but was blinded to pathological data. Suspicious sites were assigned a PRI-MUS score. Radical prostatectomy specimens were examined with quarter mount technique. Detection rate of csPCa index lesion [Grade Group (GG) ≥2] by MicroUS was assessed at a patient level. RESULTS Twenty-five participants were included in the analysis. The median age was 65.5 years (range 56 - 74). Median PSA was 6.45 ng/dL (range 2 - 31.72). Two of 25 patients did not have csPCa (GG1 disease) on radical prostatectomy. MicroUS visualized 20/23 (87%) of the csPCa index lesions [median length 9 mm (range 1.5- 28.5)]. All identified lesions were categorized PRIMUS score 4 or 5. The 3 missed index lesions were in the transition zone [median length 10.5 mm (range 4.5-22.5)]. MicroUS missed 11 non index csPCa in 9 participants [median length 1.5 mm (range 1.5-10.5)]. Of these, 8 were GG2, two GG3 and one GG5. MicroUS identified the csPCa index lesion in all 9 of these men. CONCLUSION MicroUS showed high sensitivity (87%) in detecting index lesions in the prostate gland and identified 100% of index lesions in the peripheral zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matias F Callejas
- Toronto Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network - Mt Sinai Hospital - Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic. Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Matt Truong
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic. Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lewis Thomas
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic. Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jesse K McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and of Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic. Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sangeet Ghai
- Toronto Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network - Mt Sinai Hospital - Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto. Toronto, Ontario, Canada..
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Benidir T, Lone Z, Zhang A, Nowacki AS, Munoz-Lopez C, Hegde P, Fung K, Fajnzylber J, Abouassaly R, Berglund R, Klein EA, Eltemamy M, Kaouk J, Weight CJ, Almassi N, Pascal-Haber G, Lee BH. Comparing Pathologic and Survival Outcomes Between Primary and Secondary Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer when treated by Radical Cystectomy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Urology 2022; 168:137-142. [PMID: 35772481 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare pathologic and survival outcomes between primary muscle invasive (pMIBC) and secondary muscle invasive (sMIBC) bladder cancer patients who were treated with or without cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS We reviewed cT2-T4/N0 MIBC patients at our institution between 2010-2019. pMIBC was defined as presenting with > cT2 disease on initial or restaging TURBT with no prior history of bladder cancer. sMIBC was defined as prior history of NMIBC that was treated with at least one induction course of BCG that progressed to MIBC. Outcomes analyzed included pathologic downstaging rates defined as <pT2/N0, pathologic complete response rates (pT0/N0), and survival outcomes (RFS, CSS, OS). Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier Method or Gray's test with log rank. Cox Proportional Hazards and semiparametric hazards models proposed by Fine and Gray were constructed to identify predictors of oncologic outcomes. RESULTS 333 patients were included in the analysis (sMIBC: 48 vs pMIBC: 285). There were no differences in pathologic downstaging (sMIBC: 54% vs. pMIBC: 51%, p=0.67) or pathologic complete response (sMIBC: 33% vs. pMIBC: 28, p=0.46). Survival analysis showed no differences when patients were treated with NAC+RC in oncologic outcomes. On regression analysis, only >pT2 and N+ disease were predictors of poorer CSS and OS. Separate analysis of sMIBC patients whom underwent RC only (N=61), demonstrated inferior oncologic outcomes to other cohorts (p<0.01). CONCLUSION There were no differences in pathologic response or survival between pMIBC and sMIBC patients when managed with NAC and RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Benidir
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zaeem Lone
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ao Zhang
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Amy S Nowacki
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Pranay Hegde
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Kevin Fung
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Robert Abouassaly
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ryan Berglund
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mohammed Eltemamy
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Nima Almassi
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Byron H Lee
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Scavone JL, Robinson K, Scully E, Cooper S, Esgro RA, Klein EA. Coupling gamified continuing education with confidence-based assessment to address knowledge gaps and assess attitudes towards liquid biopsy for cancer screening among primary care providers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.11012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11012 Background: Blood-based liquid biopsy assays offer a simplified approach to detect cancer early, guide clinical decision making, and predict treatment success. Given their novelty, primary care providers need education to improve knowledge and confidence regarding their use. The use of gamification in continuing medical education (CME) has been shown to increase engagement and knowledge transfer, and confidence-based learning can improve the educational experience by identified areas in which learners lack comfort. Methods: We provided a gamified CME activity based on the principles of confidence-based learning designed to educate primary care providers (PCPs) on the latest advances regarding the use of liquid biopsy for cancer screening. The game coupled knowledge questions with self-assessment of confidence to gage awareness of these topics. Pre- and post-test was used to quantify the impact of the education. The CE activity was available for credit from March 31, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Results: As of January 2022, 389 PCPs have participated. Overall, participants scored an average 76% on gaming questions related to the rationale behind the use of cell free DNA (cfDNA) for cancer screening and the benefits of liquid biopsy over tissue biopsy, demonstrating relatively high baseline knowledge on these topics. Self-reported confidence among those who answered correctly, however, was only 3.4 out of 5.0, suggesting a lack of comfort with the concepts despite answering correctly. On topics related to specific studies that demonstrated the clinical utility of liquid biopsy, participants scored only 59% and confidence scored averaged 3.17 out of 5.0, demonstrating a lack of knowledge and comfort on these topics. Across all topics, providers scored a 61% on a pre-test. Post-learning, providers scored 89%, highlighting the impact of the education on knowledge gaps. Moreover, while 52% of participants had never ordered a liquid biopsy for cancer screening prior to the education, 69% report being likely or extremely likely to do so because of the education provided. Conclusions: Integration of gamified and confidence-based learning into CE activities is an impactful way to identify and address knowledge gaps while also informing the need for future education. In this study, while self-report of confidence generally correlated with knowledge scores, confidence scores were only average even among those who answered correctly, demonstrating the need for skills-based learning that may improve comfort with liquid biopsy in the clinical setting.
Collapse
|
33
|
Zik JJ, Yoon SH, Guan Z, Stankeviciute Skidmore G, Gudoor RR, Davies KM, Deutschbauer AM, Goodlett DR, Klein EA, Ryan KR. Caulobacter lipid A is conditionally dispensable in the absence of fur and in the presence of anionic sphingolipids. Cell Rep 2022; 39:110888. [PMID: 35649364 PMCID: PMC9393093 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Lipid A, the membrane-anchored portion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), is an essential component of the outer membrane (OM) of nearly all Gram-negative bacteria. Here we identify regulatory and structural factors that together render lipid A nonessential in Caulobacter crescentus. Mutations in the ferric uptake regulator fur allow Caulobacter to survive in the absence of either LpxC, which catalyzes an early step of lipid A synthesis, or CtpA, a tyrosine phosphatase homolog we find is needed for wild-type lipid A structure and abundance. Alterations in Fur-regulated processes, rather than iron status per se, underlie the ability to survive when lipid A synthesis is blocked. Fitness of lipid A-deficient Caulobacter requires an anionic sphingolipid, ceramide phosphoglycerate (CPG), which also mediates sensitivity to the antibiotic colistin. Our results demonstrate that, in an altered regulatory landscape, anionic sphingolipids can support the integrity of a lipid A-deficient OM. Lipid A, the membrane-anchoring segment of lipopolysaccharide, is generally considered to be an essential component of the Gram-negative bacterial outer membrane. Zik et al. show that deletion of the transcriptional regulator fur and synthesis of the anionic sphingolipid ceramide phosphoglycerate enable Caulobacter crescentus to survive without lipid A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin J Zik
- Department of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Sung Hwan Yoon
- Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Ziqiang Guan
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Gabriele Stankeviciute Skidmore
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Ridhi R Gudoor
- Molecular Biosciences and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Karen M Davies
- Molecular Biosciences and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Adam M Deutschbauer
- Environmental Genomics & Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - David R Goodlett
- Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; Department of Biochemistry & Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada; University of Victoria-Genome BC Proteomics Centre, Victoria, BC V8Z 7X8, Canada
| | - Eric A Klein
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA; Biology Department, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA; Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Kathleen R Ryan
- Department of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Environmental Genomics & Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Klein EA, Beer TM, Seiden M. The Promise of Multicancer Early Detection. Comment on Pons-Belda et al. Can Circulating Tumor DNA Support a Successful Screening Test for Early Cancer Detection? The Grail Paradigm. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2171. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051243. [PMID: 35626398 PMCID: PMC9141107 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Multicancer Early Detection (MCED) represents a new and exciting paradigm for the early detection of cancer, which is the leading cause of death worldwide. Current screening tests, recommended for only five cancer types (breast, lung, colon, cervical, and prostate), are limited by a lack of complete adherence to guideline-based use and by the fact that they have cumulative high false positive rates. MCED tests agnostically detect cancer signals in the blood with good sensitivity and low false positive rates, can predict the cancer site of origin with high accuracy, can detect highly lethal cancers that have no current screening tests, and promise to improve cancer screening by improving efficiency and reducing the overall number needed to screen. Herein we outline this promise and clarify several published misconceptions about this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, 9500 Euclid Ave, Q10-1, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Tomasz M. Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, CH-14R, 3303 SW Bond Ave, Portland, OR 97239, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Werneburg GT, Adler A, Zhang A, Mukherjee SD, Haywood S, Miller AW, Klein EA. Transperineal prostate biopsy is associated with lower tissue core pathogen burden relative to transrectal biopsy: mechanistic underpinnings for lower infection risk in the transperineal approach. Urology 2022; 165:1-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
36
|
Klein EA, Beer TM, Seiden M. Multicancer early detection. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022; 60:e119-e120. [PMID: 35118852 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Scovell JM, Hettel D, Abouassaly R, Almassi N, Berglund R, Breaux T, Weight C, Isac W, Zampini A, Stark E, Rochelle R, Kestranek A, Stovsky M, Klein EA. IsoPSA ® Reduces Provider Recommendations for Biopsy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men with Total Prostate Specific Antigen ≥4 ng/ml: A Real-World Observational Clinical Utility Study. Urol Pract 2022; 9:173-180. [PMID: 37145695 DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assessed the impact of the IsoPSA® test for prostate cancer risk assessment on provider patient management decisions in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS A total of 38 providers, including advanced practice providers, fellowship trained oncologists and general urologists in the Cleveland Clinic health system including both community-based practices and academic locations, enrolled 900 men being evaluated for prostate cancer; 734 met inclusion criteria (age ≥50 years, total serum prostate specific antigen [PSA] ≥4 and <100 ng/ml and no history of prostate cancer) and IsoPSA indication for use. A standard template was used to document biopsy recommendation prior to and after receiving IsoPSA results. The primary outcome was the number of biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging recommendation changes occurring after IsoPSA testing. RESULTS IsoPSA testing resulted in a 55% (284 vs 638) net reduction in recommendations for prostate biopsy for men with total PSA ≥4 ng/ml. Additionally, a 9% reduction in recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging was observed. There was strong concordance between IsoPSA results and provider recommendations for prostate biopsy, with 87% of patients with an IsoPSA index above the threshold recommended for biopsy and 92% of patients with an IsoPSA index below the threshold not recommended for biopsy. CONCLUSIONS In a real-world clinical setting, providers from diverse training backgrounds and practice settings readily adopted IsoPSA with substantial reductions in the rate of recommended prostate biopsies in patients with elevated PSA values (≥4 ng/ml). There was a high concordance between recommendation for or against prostate biopsy and the IsoPSA result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Scovell
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel Hettel
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert Abouassaly
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nima Almassi
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ryan Berglund
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Todd Breaux
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christopher Weight
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Wahib Isac
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anna Zampini
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Elizabeth Stark
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stankeviciute G, Tang P, Ashley B, Chamberlain JD, Hansen ME, Coleman A, D’Emilia R, Fu L, Mohan EC, Nguyen H, Guan Z, Campopiano DJ, Klein EA. Convergent evolution of bacterial ceramide synthesis. Nat Chem Biol 2022; 18:305-312. [PMID: 34969973 PMCID: PMC8891067 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-021-00948-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The bacterial domain produces numerous types of sphingolipids with various physiological functions. In the human microbiome, commensal and pathogenic bacteria use these lipids to modulate the host inflammatory system. Despite their growing importance, their biosynthetic pathway remains undefined since several key eukaryotic ceramide synthesis enzymes have no bacterial homolog. Here we used genomic and biochemical approaches to identify six proteins comprising the complete pathway for bacterial ceramide synthesis. Bioinformatic analyses revealed the widespread potential for bacterial ceramide synthesis leading to our discovery of a Gram-positive species that produces ceramides. Biochemical evidence demonstrated that the bacterial pathway operates in a different order from that in eukaryotes. Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses support the hypothesis that the bacterial and eukaryotic ceramide pathways evolved independently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Stankeviciute
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA,Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Peijun Tang
- East Chem School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Ashley
- East Chem School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua D. Chamberlain
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
| | - Matthew E.B. Hansen
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Aimiyah Coleman
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
| | - Rachel D’Emilia
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
| | - Larina Fu
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
| | - Eric C. Mohan
- East Chem School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, United Kingdom
| | - Hung Nguyen
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
| | - Ziqiang Guan
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Dominic J. Campopiano
- East Chem School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, United Kingdom,Correspondence to: , , and
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA,Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA,Biology Department, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA.,Correspondence to: , , and
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Benidir T, Hofmann M, Lone ZM, Weight C, Klein EA. Pathologic and radiographic outcomes following prostate cancer diagnosis aided by IsoPSA testing. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
276 Background: IsoPSA is a structure-based assay previously demonstrated to outperform prostate specific antigen (PSA) and free-to-total PSA ratio in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer at the time of biopsy (Stovsky, Klein 2019). Herein we report pathologic outcomes in patients treated via radical prostatectomy (RP) whom had undergone IsoPSA testing prior to their diagnostic biopsy. We also explore IsoPSA status in the context of MRI dependent findings, including PIRADS scores and PSA density. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients whom had undergone IsoPSA testing prior to biopsy and RP at our institution between 2019-2021. We also identified subsets of patients with pre-operative prostate MRI’s. Exploratory analyses were performed to determine associations between IsoPSA and adverse histologic (cribiform, intraductal status (CB/ID), grade group status) pathologic (extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, surgical margins) and radiographic (PSA density, PIRADS, location) features. We examined these data points in a randomly selected control group of RP patients whom had not had IsoPSA testing. Student’s T-test, Mann Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis, were used where appropriate. Results: A total of 83 patients underwent RP following IsoPSA testing, with 72.2% (60/83) also undergoing pre-operative prostate MRI. The mean total PSA was 10.3 ng/dL, IsoPSA index was 10.2 and prostate size 46.8 cc. IsoPSA was significantly associated with PSA density (median IsoPSA of 9.9 vs 7.8 for PSA density > 0.15, <0.15 respectively, p < 0.001). The median IsoPSA index was higher when the dominant tumor was found in the transitional zone versus peripheral zone (12.7 vs 8.8 p = 0.011). IsoPSA trended towards but was not associated with PIRADS-v2 score (1-2 vs 3 vs 4-5) (p = 0.1). IsoPSA was not selectively associated with adverse pathological or histological features. Conclusions: IsoPSA has been shown to predict clinically significant disease on biopsy, and as such may improve the selection of men for such intervention. In our initial cohort, IsoPSA reliably identified patients with clinically significant disease without selecting for unique adverse pathologic/histologic features when compared to a control group. Radiographically, IsoPSA was significantly associated with elevated PSA density ( > 0.15), tumor location (TZ vs PZ), and trended towards significance with PIRADS v.2 score (p = 0.1. Further work is encouraged to explore its adjunctive benefit in correlation to MRI features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Benidir
- Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Zaeem M Lone
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lone ZM, Benidir T, Rainey M, Nair M, Davicioni E, Gibb E, Williamson S, Nguyen J, Gupta S, Ornstein MC, Tendulkar RD, Weight C, Klein EA, Mian OY. A genomic classifier for prostate cancer correlates with adverse pathologic features: Transcriptomic features of cribriform and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
268 Background: Invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma (CF/IDC) portends an unfavorable prognosis for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (CaP). Limited studies with small sample sizes have explored whether genomic classifiers are associated with IDC and/or CF status. We investigated the correlation between Decipher genomic risk score and IDC/CF status and assessed PCa transcriptomic features. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of CaP patients who had Decipher testing at a single high volume center between 2009-2020. The highest grade index lesion from radical prostatectomy specimens was identified by GU pathologists and used for Decipher testing. Genitourinary pathologists reviewed prostatectomy specimens for the presence of CF and IDC features. Patients were divided into three groups based on pathologic features, absent CF/IDC (CF-/IDC-), CF positive only (CF+/IDC-), and CF/IDC positive (CF+/IDC+). Categorical clinical, genomic, and pathologic variables were assessed using the Pearson Chi-Square test, quantitative with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of high-risk Decipher GC scores. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank was used to compare biochemical recurrence free survival. Differential gene expression and gene network analysis was used to identify genes and pathways associated with IDC/CF features. Results: 463 patients were included with a median follow-up of 25 months. Patients who were CF+/IDC+ had higher GC scores (CF+/IDC+: 0.77 vs. CF+/IDC-: 0.71 vs. CF-/IDC-: 0.61, p<0.001). Patients who were CF+/IDC+ had a higher percentage of Gleason grade group >3 (CF+/IDC+: 79% vs. CF+/IDC-: 52% vs. CF-/IDC-: 52%, p<0.001). On multivariate logistic regression, predictors of high-risk GC score were presence of CF+/IDC+ features on final pathology (OR: 3.94, p<0.001) and pathologic Gleason grade group >3 (OR: 1.58, p=0.04). Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the hallmark androgen response pathway was significantly upregulated in CF+/IDC+ patients (Log fold change: 15.7, p<0001). Conclusions: This is the largest series investigating the association of a clinically validated genomic classifier and pathologic features such as cribriform and intraductal carcinoma. These findings have implications for the use of genomic classifiers in settings where expert GU pathology is not readily available and in potentially unmasking adverse histology at the time of biopsy.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaeem M Lone
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Tarik Benidir
- Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Monica Nair
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | - Jane Nguyen
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | | - Omar Y. Mian
- Cleveland Clinic, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dept. of Translational Hematology Oncology Research, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Benidir T, Hofmann M, Weight C, Klein EA, Purysko A. Do prostate MRI reports consider focal therapy when describing diagnostic findings? A descriptive review and analysis of concordance among prostate MRI reports and radical prostatectomy pathology reports. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
41 Background: Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming an attractive option for men seeking treatments that minimize the morbidity of whole gland therapy. Prostate MRI reports should include lesion location, presence of bilateral extension and presence of multifocality as these radiographic features are essential in selecting appropriate candidacy. We aim to evaluate concordance of disease between MRI and final pathology reports. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of pathology reports from radical prostatectomies (RP) performed at our institution between 2016-2019, in patients whom also underwent pre-operative prostate MRI’s. The number and locations of PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions described in MRI reports were compared against the RP findings and assessed for disease concordance in terms of lesion location, extent (unilateral vs. bilateral extent) and/or the presence of tumor multifocality. Fischer’s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 1593 patients underwent RP, among which 416 (26.1%) had preoperative prostate MRI’s. A majority (65.3%) (n = 273/416) of MRI’s reported a single PI-RADS > 3 lesion, 51/416 (12.3%) had negative MRI’s and 22.1% (92/416) described >2 PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions. A total of n = 388/416 (93.2%) had detailed descriptions of their MRI and path reports for comparative analysis. MRI and final path tumor concordance with respect to unifocal extent or multifocality was low at 37.2%. When a single PI-RADS > 3 lesion was described, concordance with final path was 37.6% as compared to 55.6% when >2 lesions were described (p = 0.006). Discordant findings at final path included the presence of tumor multifocality (80.7%) or the extent of a unifocal lesion (19.3%). Lesions crossing the midline were uncommonly reported on MRI (16%). When prostate midline assessment was included in the evaluation of lesion extent, the degree of concordance with final pathology improved from 33.3% to 64.2% (p = 0.038). Conclusions: Prostate MRI reports have a large discordance with RP reports. Tumor multifocality and/or unifocal disease crossing the midline may not hold significant meaning if the disease is ultimately organ confined and the treatment is aimed at the whole gland. However, in the context of focal therapy, these findings are of germane importance. Radiologists are encouraged to consider focal therapy as a treatment strategy when describing MRI findings and acknowledge the importance of tumor multifocality/bilaterality in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik Benidir
- Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jiang Y, Meyers TJ, Emeka AA, Cooley LF, Cooper PR, Lancki N, Helenowski I, Kachuri L, Lin DW, Stanford JL, Newcomb LF, Kolb S, Finelli A, Fleshner NE, Komisarenko M, Eastham JA, Ehdaie B, Benfante N, Logothetis CJ, Gregg JR, Perez CA, Garza S, Kim J, Marks LS, Delfin M, Barsa D, Vesprini D, Klotz LH, Loblaw A, Mamedov A, Goldenberg SL, Higano CS, Spillane M, Wu E, Carter HB, Pavlovich CP, Mamawala M, Landis T, Carroll PR, Chan JM, Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Morgan TM, Siddiqui J, Martin R, Klein EA, Brittain K, Gotwald P, Barocas DA, Dallmer JR, Gordetsky JB, Steele P, Kundu SD, Stockdale J, Roobol MJ, Venderbos LD, Sanda MG, Arnold R, Patil D, Evans CP, Dall’Era MA, Vij A, Costello AJ, Chow K, Corcoran NM, Rais-Bahrami S, Phares C, Scherr DS, Flynn T, Karnes RJ, Koch M, Dhondt CR, Nelson JB, McBride D, Cookson MS, Stratton KL, Farriester S, Hemken E, Stadler WM, Pera T, Banionyte D, Bianco FJ, Lopez IH, Loeb S, Taneja SS, Byrne N, Amling CL, Martinez A, Boileau L, Gaylis FD, Petkewicz J, Kirwen N, Helfand BT, Xu J, Scholtens DM, Catalona WJ, Witte JS. Genetic Factors Associated with Prostate Cancer Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment. HGG Adv 2022; 3:100070. [PMID: 34993496 PMCID: PMC8725988 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) are increasingly electing active surveillance (AS) as their initial management strategy. While this may reduce the side effects of treatment for prostate cancer, many men on AS eventually convert to active treatment. PC is one of the most heritable cancers, and genetic factors that predispose to aggressive tumors may help distinguish men who are more likely to discontinue AS. To investigate this, we undertook a multi-institutional genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 5,222 PC patients and 1,139 other patients from replication cohorts, all of whom initially elected AS and were followed over time for the potential outcome of conversion from AS to active treatment. In the GWAS we detected 18 variants associated with conversion, 15 of which were not previously associated with PC risk. With a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), we found two genes associated with conversion (MAST3, p = 6.9×10-7 and GAB2, p = 2.0×10-6). Moreover, increasing values of a previously validated 269-variant genetic risk score (GRS) for PC was positively associated with conversion (e.g., comparing the highest to the two middle deciles gave a hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]= 0.94-1.36); whereas, decreasing values of a 36-variant GRS for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were positively associated with conversion (e.g., comparing the lowest to the two middle deciles gave a HR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.50). These results suggest that germline genetics may help inform and individualize the decision of AS-or the intensity of monitoring on AS-versus treatment for the initial management of patients with low-risk PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Travis J. Meyers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Adaeze A. Emeka
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Lauren Folgosa Cooley
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Phillip R. Cooper
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Nicola Lancki
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Irene Helenowski
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Linda Kachuri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Daniel W. Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Cancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Janet L. Stanford
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Lisa F. Newcomb
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Cancer Prevention Program, Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Suzanne Kolb
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil E. Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Komisarenko
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James A. Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher J. Logothetis
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Justin R. Gregg
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cherie A. Perez
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sergio Garza
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeri Kim
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology and Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leonard S. Marks
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Merdie Delfin
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danielle Barsa
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health and Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laurence H. Klotz
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health and Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health and Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mamedov
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health and Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S. Larry Goldenberg
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Celestia S. Higano
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Maria Spillane
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Eugenia Wu
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - H. Ballentine Carter
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christian P. Pavlovich
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mufaddal Mamawala
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tricia Landis
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - June M. Chan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew R. Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Janet E. Cowan
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rabia Martin
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Karen Brittain
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Paige Gotwald
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jeremiah R. Dallmer
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer B. Gordetsky
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Pam Steele
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Shilajit D. Kundu
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Jazmine Stockdale
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Monique J. Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lionne D.F. Venderbos
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin G. Sanda
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rebecca Arnold
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dattatraya Patil
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christopher P. Evans
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Marc A. Dall’Era
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Anjali Vij
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Anthony J. Costello
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ken Chow
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Niall M. Corcoran
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Courtney Phares
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Douglas S. Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Flynn
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael Koch
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Courtney Rose Dhondt
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joel B. Nelson
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dawn McBride
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael S. Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Kelly L. Stratton
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Stephen Farriester
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Erin Hemken
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Tuula Pera
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Stacy Loeb
- Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samir S. Taneja
- Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nataliya Byrne
- Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ann Martinez
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Luc Boileau
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Franklin D. Gaylis
- Genesis Healthcare Partners, Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Nicholas Kirwen
- Division of Urology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Brian T. Helfand
- Division of Urology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Division of Urology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Denise M. Scholtens
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - William J. Catalona
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - John S. Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Departments of Epidemiology and Population Health, Biomedical Data Science, and Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Darst BF, Hughley R, Pfennig A, Hazra U, Fan C, Wan P, Sheng X, Xia L, Andrews C, Chen F, Berndt SI, Kote-Jarai Z, Govindasami K, Bensen JT, Ingles SA, Rybicki BA, Nemesure B, John EM, Fowke JH, Huff CD, Strom SS, Isaacs WB, Park JY, Zheng W, Ostrander EA, Walsh PC, Carpten J, Sellers TA, Yamoah K, Murphy AB, Sanderson M, Crawford DC, Gapstur SM, Bush WS, Aldrich MC, Cussenot O, Petrovics G, Cullen J, Neslund-Dudas C, Kittles RA, Xu J, Stern MC, Chokkalingam AP, Multigner L, Parent ME, Menegaux F, Cancel-Tassin G, Kibel AS, Klein EA, Goodman PJ, Stanford JL, Drake BF, Hu JJ, Clark PE, Blanchet P, Casey G, Hennis AJM, Lubwama A, Thompson IM, Leach RJ, Gundell SM, Pooler L, Mohler JL, Fontham ETH, Smith GJ, Taylor JA, Brureau L, Blot WJ, Biritwum R, Tay E, Truelove A, Niwa S, Tettey Y, Varma R, McKean-Cowdin R, Torres M, Jalloh M, Magueye Gueye S, Niang L, Ogunbiyi O, Oladimeji Idowu M, Popoola O, Adebiyi AO, Aisuodionoe-Shadrach OI, Nwegbu M, Adusei B, Mante S, Darkwa-Abrahams A, Yeboah ED, Mensah JE, Anthony Adjei A, Diop H, Cook MB, Chanock SJ, Watya S, Eeles RA, Chiang CWK, Lachance J, Rebbeck TR, Conti DV, Haiman CA. A Rare Germline HOXB13 Variant Contributes to Risk of Prostate Cancer in Men of African Ancestry. Eur Urol 2022; 81:458-462. [PMID: 35031163 PMCID: PMC9018520 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A rare African ancestry-specific germline deletion variant in HOXB13 (X285K, rs77179853) was recently reported in Martinican men with early-onset prostate cancer. Given the role of HOXB13 germline variation in prostate cancer, we investigated the association between HOXB13 X285K and prostate cancer risk in a large sample of 22 361 African ancestry men, including 11 688 prostate cancer cases. The risk allele was present only in men of West African ancestry, with an allele frequency in men that ranged from 0.40% in Ghana and 0.31% in Nigeria to 0% in Uganda and South Africa, with a range of frequencies in men with admixed African ancestry from North America and Europe (0-0.26%). HOXB13 X285K was associated with 2.4-fold increased odds of prostate cancer (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-3.9, p = 2 × 10-4), with greater risk observed for more aggressive and advanced disease (Gleason ≥8: odds ratio [OR] = 4.7, 95% CI = 2.3-9.5, p = 2 × 10-5; stage T3/T4: OR = 4.5, 95% CI = 2.0-10.0, p = 2 × 10-4; metastatic disease: OR = 5.1, 95% CI = 1.9-13.7, p = 0.001). We estimated that the allele arose in West Africa 1500-4600 yr ago. Further analysis is needed to understand how the HOXB13 X285K variant impacts the HOXB13 protein and function in the prostate. Understanding who carries this mutation may inform prostate cancer screening in men of West African ancestry. PATIENT SUMMARY: A rare African ancestry-specific germline deletion in HOXB13, found only in men of West African ancestry, was reported to be associated with an increased risk of overall and advanced prostate cancer. Understanding who carries this mutation may help inform screening for prostate cancer in men of West African ancestry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcu F Darst
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Raymond Hughley
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Pfennig
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ujani Hazra
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Caoqi Fan
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peggy Wan
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xin Sheng
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lucy Xia
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Caroline Andrews
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fei Chen
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sonja I Berndt
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Koveela Govindasami
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sue A Ingles
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin A Rybicki
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Barbara Nemesure
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jay H Fowke
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, TN, USA
| | - Chad D Huff
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sara S Strom
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William B Isaacs
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jong Y Park
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Elaine A Ostrander
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Patrick C Walsh
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Carpten
- Department of Translational Genomics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Thomas A Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Adam B Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maureen Sanderson
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dana C Crawford
- Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Susan M Gapstur
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - William S Bush
- Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melinda C Aldrich
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- CeRePP & Sorbonne Universite, GRC n° 5, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Gyorgy Petrovics
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Rick A Kittles
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care and Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Mariana C Stern
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Luc Multigner
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) -UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Marie-Elise Parent
- Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Institut national de la recherche scientifique, University of Quebec, Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Florence Menegaux
- Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), Inserm, Team Cancer-Environment, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Phyllis J Goodman
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Janet L Stanford
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bettina F Drake
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer J Hu
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Peter E Clark
- Atrium Health/Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Pascal Blanchet
- CHU de Guadeloupe, Univ Antilles, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) -UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Graham Casey
- Center for Public Health Genomics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Anselm J M Hennis
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA; George Alleyne Chronic Disease Research Centre and Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados
| | - Alexander Lubwama
- School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ian M Thompson
- CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Health System and The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robin J Leach
- Department of Cell Systems and Anatomy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Susan M Gundell
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Loreall Pooler
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James L Mohler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth T H Fontham
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Gary J Smith
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epigenetic and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Laurent Brureau
- CHU de Guadeloupe, Univ Antilles, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) -UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - William J Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Evelyn Tay
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | - Yao Tettey
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana; University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Rohit Varma
- Southern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Roberta McKean-Cowdin
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mina Torres
- Southern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Olufemi Ogunbiyi
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | | - Olufemi Popoola
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Akindele O Adebiyi
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oseremen I Aisuodionoe-Shadrach
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Maxwell Nwegbu
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | - Edward D Yeboah
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana; University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | - Halimatou Diop
- Laboratoires Bacteriologie et Virologie, Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Michael B Cook
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen Watya
- School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda; Uro Care, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charleston W K Chiang
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Lachance
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David V Conti
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chang P, Wagner AA, Regan MM, Smith JA, Saigal CS, Litwin MS, Hu JC, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Klein EA, Kibel AS, Andriole GL, Han M, Partin AW, Wood DP, Crociani CM, Greenfield TK, Patil D, Hembroff LA, Davis K, Stork L, Spratt DE, Wei JT, Sanda MG. Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: The PROST-QA/RP2 Consortium. J Urol 2022; 207:127-136. [PMID: 34433304 PMCID: PMC8840795 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our goal was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in a multicenter study. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated men with localized prostate cancer at 11 high-volume academic medical centers in the United States from the PROST-QA (2003-2006) and the PROST-QA/RP2 cohorts (2010-2013) with a pre-specified goal of comparing RALP (549) and ORP (545). We measured longitudinal patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at pre-treatment and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months, and pathological and perioperative outcomes/complications. RESULTS Demographics, cancer characteristics, and margin status were similar between surgical approaches. ORP subjects were more likely to undergo lymphadenectomy (89% vs 47%; p <0.01) and nerve sparing (94% vs 89%; p <0.01). RALP vs ORP subjects experienced less mean intraoperative blood loss (192 vs 805 mL; p <0.01), shorter mean hospital stay (1.6 vs 2.1 days; p <0.01), and fewer blood transfusions (1% vs 4%; p <0.01), wound infections (2% vs 4%; p=0.02), other infections (1% vs 4%; p <0.01), deep venous thromboses (0.5% vs 2%; p=0.04), and bladder neck contractures requiring dilation (1.6% vs 8.3%; p <0.01). RALP subjects reported less pain (p=0.04), less activity interference (p <0.01) and higher incision satisfaction (p <0.01). Surgical approach (RALP vs ORP) was not a significant predictor of longitudinal HRQOL change in any HRQOL domain. CONCLUSIONS In high-volume academic centers, RALP and ORP patients may expect similar long-term HRQOL outcomes. Overall, RALP patients have less pain, shorter hospital stays, and fewer post-surgical complications such as blood transfusions, infections, deep venous thromboses, and bladder neck contractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Chang
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School
| | - Andrew A. Wagner
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School
| | - Meredith M. Regan
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Joseph A. Smith
- Department of Urological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Mark S. Litwin
- Departments of Urology, Health Policy and Management, UCLA Center for Health Sciences, Los Angeles
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Misop Han
- Johns Hopkins University and The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alan W. Partin
- Johns Hopkins University and The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Catrina M. Crociani
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Dattatraya Patil
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Larry A. Hembroff
- Office for Survey Research, Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| | - Kyle Davis
- Office for Survey Research, Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| | - Linda Stork
- Office for Survey Research, Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - John T. Wei
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Martin G. Sanda
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Xiang M, Ma TM, Savjani R, Pollom EL, Karnes RJ, Grogan T, Wong JK, Motterle G, Tosoian JJ, Trock BJ, Klein EA, Stish BJ, Dess RT, Spratt DE, Pilar A, Reddy C, Levin-Epstein R, Wedde TB, Lilleby WA, Fiano R, Merrick GS, Stock RG, Demanes DJ, Moran BJ, Huland H, Tran PT, Martin S, Martinez-Monge R, Krauss DJ, Abu-Isa EI, Alam R, Schwen Z, Pisansky TM, Choo CR, Song DY, Greco S, Deville C, McNutt T, DeWeese TL, Ross AE, Ciezki JP, Boutros PC, Nickols NG, Bhat P, Shabsovich D, Juarez JE, Chong N, Kupelian PA, Rettig MB, Zaorsky NG, Berlin A, Tward JD, Davis BJ, Reiter RE, Steinberg ML, Elashoff D, Horwitz EM, Tendulkar RD, Tilki D, Czernin J, Gafita A, Romero T, Calais J, Kishan AU. Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2138550. [PMID: 34902034 PMCID: PMC8669522 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect low-volume, nonlocalized (ie, regional or metastatic) prostate cancer that was occult on conventional imaging. However, the long-term clinical implications of PSMA PET/CT upstaging remain unclear. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic significance of a nomogram that models an individual's risk of nonlocalized upstaging on PSMA PET/CT and to compare its performance with existing risk-stratification tools. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included patients diagnosed with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, and/or clinical stage T3-T4, without evidence of nodal or metastatic disease by conventional workup) from April 1995 to August 2018. This multinational study was conducted at 15 centers. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to March 2021. EXPOSURES Curative-intent radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy (BT), with or without androgen deprivation therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES PSMA upstage probability was calculated from a nomogram using the biopsy Gleason score, percentage positive systematic biopsy cores, clinical T category, and PSA level. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Fine-Gray and Cox regressions. Model performance was quantified with the concordance (C) index. RESULTS Of 5275 patients, the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years; 2883 (55%) were treated with RP, 1669 (32%) with EBRT, and 723 (14%) with EBRT plus BT; median (IQR) PSA level was 10.5 (5.9-23.2) ng/mL; 3987 (76%) had Gleason grade 8 to 10 disease; and 750 (14%) had stage T3 to T4 disease. Median (IQR) follow-up was 5.1 (3.1-7.9) years; 1221 (23%) were followed up for at least 8 years. Overall, 1895 (36%) had BCR, 851 (16%) developed DM, and 242 (5%) died of prostate cancer. PSMA upstage probability was significantly prognostic of all clinical end points, with 8-year C indices of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.65) for BCR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71) for DM, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.75) for PCSM, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.57-0.62) for PCSM (P < .001). The PSMA nomogram outperformed existing risk-stratification tools, except for similar performance to Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate (STAR-CAP) for PCSM (eg, DM: PSMA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71] vs STAR-CAP, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.68]; P < .001; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54-0.60]; P < .001; Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment groups, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.51-0.56]; P < .001). Results were validated in secondary cohorts from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the National Cancer Database. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that PSMA upstage probability is associated with long-term, clinically meaningful end points. Furthermore, PSMA upstaging had superior risk discrimination compared with existing tools. Formerly occult, PSMA PET/CT-detectable nonlocalized disease may be the main driver of outcomes in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Ting Martin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Ricky Savjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Erqi L. Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | - Tristan Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jessica K. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Bruce J. Trock
- Department of Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bradley J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Robert T. Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Avinash Pilar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chandana Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Trude B. Wedde
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Wolfgang A. Lilleby
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ryan Fiano
- Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, West Virginia
| | - Gregory S. Merrick
- Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, West Virginia
| | - Richard G. Stock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York
| | | | - Brian J. Moran
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Chicago, Westmont, Illinois
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Phuoc T. Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Santiago Martin
- Department of Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rafael Martinez-Monge
- Department of Oncology, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Daniel J. Krauss
- Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Eyad I. Abu-Isa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Ridwan Alam
- Department of Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zeyad Schwen
- Department of Urology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - C. Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Daniel Y. Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Todd McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theodore L. DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashley E. Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jay P. Ciezki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Paul C. Boutros
- Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Nicholas G. Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Prashant Bhat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - David Shabsovich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Jesus E. Juarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Natalie Chong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | | | - Matthew B. Rettig
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Veterans Affairs (VA) Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas G. Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan D. Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Brian J. Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eric M. Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rahul D. Tendulkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tahmineh Romero
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U. Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Brooks MA, Thomas L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Li J, Crager MR, Lu R, Baehner FL, Abran J, Aboushwareb T, Klein EA. Validating the Association of Adverse Pathology with Distant Metastasis and Prostate Cancer Mortality 20-Years After Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:104.e1-104.e7. [PMID: 34824014 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the association of adverse pathology (AP), defined as high-grade (≥ Gleason Grade Group 3) and/or non-organ confined disease, with long-term oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a stratified cohort sampling design, we evaluated the association of AP with the risk of distant metastasis (DM) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) up to 20 years after RP in 428 patients treated between 1987 to 2004. Cox regression of cause-specific hazards was used to estimate the absolute risk of both endpoints, with death from other causes treated as a competing risk. Additionally, subgroup analysis in patients with low and/or intermediate-risk disease, who are potentially eligible for active surveillance (AS), was performed. RESULTS Within the cohort sample, 53% of men exhibited AP at time of RP, with median follow up of 15.5 years (IQR 14.6-16.6 years) thereafter. Adverse pathology was highly associated with DM and PCSM in the overall cohort (HR 12.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.30-28.55, and HR 10.03, 95% CI 3.42-29.47, respectively, both P < 0.001). Adverse pathology was also highly associated with DM and PCSM in the low/intermediate-risk subgroup (HR 10.48, 95% CI 4.18-26.28, and 8.60, 95% CI 2.40-30.48, respectively, both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Adverse pathology at the time of RP is highly associated with future development of DM and PCSM. Accurate prediction of AP may thus be useful for individualizing risk-based surveillance and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Brooks
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Lewis Thomas
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Jianbo Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Ruixiao Lu
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA
| | | | - John Abran
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA
| | | | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Purysko AS, Bullen J, Valdez R, Austhof E, D'Ippolito G, Klein EA. Influence of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors on Prostate Cancer Detection with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Matched Cohort Study. J Urol 2021; 206:1139-1146. [PMID: 34228500 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the influence of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) on the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of Gleason grade group (GG) ≥2 prostate cancer, and on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single center, retrospective study included men who had MRI for initial detection or active surveillance of prostate cancer. The study group included 59 men who used for 5-ARIs for ≥12 months, and the control group included 59 men who were matched for both MRI indication and biopsy results. DeLong's test was used to compare the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detection of GG ≥2 cancer between the groups. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparison of lesions apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics between the groups. RESULTS MRI accuracy in the study group (AUC=0.778) was not significantly different compared to the control group (AUC=0.821; 95% CI for difference 0.22-0.13; p=0.636). In the control group, all ADC metrics were lower in lesions with GG ≥2 cancer on biopsy than in those with GG 1 cancer or negative results (p=0.001-0.01). In the study group, this difference was significant only when the mean ADC of the lesions was normalized by the ADC of urine (p=0.044). CONCLUSIONS Long-term exposure to 5-ARIs does not seem to impair the detection of significant cancer on MRI but may affect the ability of ADC metrics to discriminate between lesions that harbor significant cancer and those that harbor insignificant cancer or benign tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei S Purysko
- Abdominal Imaging Section and Nuclear Radiology Department, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jennifer Bullen
- Quantitative Health Sciences Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Giuseppe D'Ippolito
- Hospital Sao Paulo, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo and Grupo Fleury, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Reichard CA, Naelitz BD, Wang Z, Jia X, Li J, Stampfer MJ, Klein EA, Hazen SL, Sharifi N. Gut Microbiome-Dependent Metabolic Pathways and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer: Prospective Analysis of a PLCO Cancer Screening Trial Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 31:192-199. [PMID: 34711629 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diet and the gut microbiome have a complex interaction that generates metabolites with an unclear effect on lethal prostate cancer risk. Identification of modifiable risk factors for lethal prostate cancer is challenging given the long natural history of this disease and difficulty of prospectively identifying lethal cancers. METHODS Mass spectrometry was performed on baseline serum samples collected from 173 lethal prostate cancer cases and 519 controls enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial. Baseline serum levels of choline, carnitine, betaine, γ-butyrobetaine, crotonobetaine, phenylacetylglutamine, hippuric acid, and p-cresol sulfate were quantified and analyzed by quartile. Conditional multivariable logistic regression analysis associated analyte levels with lethal prostate cancer incidence after adjusting for body mass index and PSA. The Cochran-Armitage test evaluated analyte level trends across quartiles. RESULTS Relative to those in the first quartile, cases with the highest baseline levels of choline (Q4 OR: 2.19; 95% CI, 1.23-3.90; P-trend: 0.005) and betaine (Q4 OR: 1.86; 95% CI, 1.05-3.30; P-trend: 0.11) exhibited increased odds of developing lethal prostate cancer. Higher baseline serum levels of phenylacetylglutamine (Q4 OR: 2.55; 95% CI, 1.40-4.64; P-trend: 0.003), a gut microbiome metabolite of phenylalanine with adrenergic activity, were also associated with lethal prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS Baseline serum levels of one-carbon methyl donors and adrenergic compounds resulting from human and gut microbiota-mediated metabolism are associated with increased lethal prostate cancer risk. IMPACT Dietary composition, circulating metabolite levels, and downstream signaling pathways may represent modifiable risk factors associated with incident lethal prostate cancer. Beta-adrenergic blockade represents an additional target for oncologic risk reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad A Reichard
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Urology of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Bryan D Naelitz
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Zeneng Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Xun Jia
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Jianbo Li
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Departments of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric A Klein
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stanley L Hazen
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Ohio.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Ohio
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Genitourinary Malignancies Research Center, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. .,Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Purysko AS, Childes BJ, Ward RD, Bittencourt LK, Klein EA. Pitfalls in Prostate MRI Interpretation: A Pictorial Review. Semin Roentgenol 2021; 56:391-405. [PMID: 34688342 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2021.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei S Purysko
- Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH..
| | - Benjamin J Childes
- Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ryan D Ward
- Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chen X, Dong Z, Hubbell E, Kurtzman KN, Oxnard GR, Venn O, Melton C, Clarke CA, Shaknovich R, Ma T, Meixiong G, Seiden MV, Klein EA, Fung ET, Liu MC. Prognostic Significance of Blood-Based Multi-cancer Detection in Plasma Cell-Free DNA. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4221-4229. [PMID: 34088722 PMCID: PMC9401481 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We recently reported the development of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) targeted methylation (TM)-based sequencing approach for a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test that includes cancer signal origin prediction. Here, we evaluated the prognostic significance of cancer detection by the MCED test using longitudinal follow-up data. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN As part of a Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA) substudy, plasma cfDNA samples were sequenced using a TM approach, and machine learning classifiers predicted cancer status and cancer signal origin. Overall survival (OS) of cancer participants in the first 3 years of follow-up was evaluated in relation to cancer detection by the MCED test and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Cancers not detected by the MCED test had significantly better OS (P < 0.0001) than cancers detected, even after accounting for other covariates, including clinical stage and method of clinical diagnosis (i.e., standard-of-care screening or clinical presentation with signs/symptoms). Additionally, cancers not detected by the MCED test had better OS than was expected when data were adjusted for age, stage, and cancer type from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. In cancers with current screening options, the MCED test also differentiated more aggressive cancers from less aggressive cancers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Cancer detection by the MCED test was prognostic beyond clinical stage and method of diagnosis. Cancers not detected by the MCED test had better prognosis than cancers detected and SEER-based expected survival. Cancer detection and prognosis may be linked by the underlying biological factor of tumor fraction in cfDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ting Ma
- GRAIL, Inc., Menlo Park, California
| | | | | | - Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Minetta C. Liu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,Corresponding Author: Minetta C. Liu, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: (507) 284-2511; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|