1
|
Vreeburg MTA, de Vries HM, van der Noort V, Horenblas S, van Rhijn BWG, Hendricksen K, Graafland N, van der Poel HG, Brouwer OR. Penile cancer care in the Netherlands: increased incidence, centralisation, and improved survival. BJU Int 2024; 133:596-603. [PMID: 38403729 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) incidence and centralisation trends in the Netherlands over the past three decades, as well as the effect of centralisation of PSCC care on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the Netherlands PSCC care is largely centralised in one national centre of expertise (Netherlands Cancer Institute [NCI], Amsterdam). For this study, the Netherlands Cancer Registry, an independent nationwide cancer registry, provided per-patient data on age, clinical and pathological tumour staging, follow-up, and vital status. Patients with treatment at the NCI were identified and compared to patients who were treated at all other centres. The age-standardised incidence rate was calculated with the European Standard Population. The probability of death due to PSCC was estimated using the relative survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of survival. RESULTS A total of 3160 patients were diagnosed with PSCC between 1990 and 2020, showing a rising incidence (P < 0.001). Annual caseload increased at the NCI (1% in 1990, 65% in 2020) and decreased at other (regional) centres (99% to 35%). Despite a relatively high percentage of patients with T2-4 (64%) and N+ (33%) at the NCI, the 5-year relative survival was higher (86%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 82-91%) compared to regional centres (76%, 95% CI 73-80%, P < 0.001). Patients with a pathological T2 tumour were treated with glans-sparing treatment more often at the reference centre than at the regional centres (16% vs 5.0%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, histological grading, T-stage, presence of lymph node involvement and year of diagnosis, treatment at regional centres remained a predictor for worse survival (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.39; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION The incidence of PSCC in the Netherlands has been gradually increasing over the past three decades, with a noticeable trend towards centralisation of PSCC care and improved relative survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon T A Vreeburg
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hielke-Martijn de Vries
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Graafland
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Contieri R, Mertens LS, Claps F, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LALM, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. Second TURB, restaging TURB or repeat TURB in primary T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: impact on prognosis? Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1323-1333. [PMID: 37980689 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03867-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A re-transurethral resection of the bladder (re-TURB) is a well-established approach in managing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for various reasons: repeat-TURB is recommended for a macroscopically incomplete initial resection, restaging-TURB is required if the first resection was macroscopically complete but contained no detrusor muscle (DM) and second-TURB is advised for all completely resected T1-tumors with DM in the resection specimen. This study assessed the long-term outcomes after repeat-, second-, and restaging-TURB in T1-NMIBC patients. METHODS Individual patient data with tumor characteristics of 1660 primary T1-patients (muscle-invasion at re-TURB omitted) diagnosed from 1990 to 2018 in 17 hospitals were analyzed. Time to recurrence, progression, death due to bladder cancer (BC), and all causes (OS) were visualized with cumulative incidence functions and analyzed by log-rank tests and multivariable Cox-regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS Median follow-up was 45.3 (IQR 22.7-81.1) months. There were no differences in time to recurrence, progression, or OS between patients undergoing restaging (135 patients), second (644 patients), or repeat-TURB (84 patients), nor between patients who did or who did not undergo second or restaging-TURB. However, patients who underwent repeat-TURB had a shorter time to BC death compared to those who had second- or restaging-TURB (multivariable HR 3.58, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Prognosis did not significantly differ between patients who underwent restaging- or second-TURB. However, a worse prognosis in terms of death due to bladder cancer was found in patients who underwent repeat-TURB compared to second-TURB and restaging-TURB, highlighting the importance of separately evaluating different indications for re-TURB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Alemany
- Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Pešl
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Pathology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Pathology, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gil-Jimenez A, van Dijk N, Vos JL, Lubeck Y, van Montfoort ML, Peters D, Hooijberg E, Broeks A, Zuur CL, van Rhijn BWG, Vis DJ, van der Heijden MS, Wessels LFA. Spatial relationships in the urothelial and head and neck tumor microenvironment predict response to combination immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2538. [PMID: 38514623 PMCID: PMC10957922 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46450-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can achieve remarkable responses in urothelial cancer (UC), which may depend on tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics. However, the relationship between the TME, usually characterized by immune cell density, and response to ICI is unclear. Here, we quantify the TME immune cell densities and spatial relationships (SRs) of 24 baseline UC samples, obtained before pre-operative combination ICI treatment, using multiplex immunofluorescence. We describe SRs by approximating the first nearest-neighbor distance distribution with a Weibull distribution and evaluate the association between TME metrics and ipilimumab+nivolumab response. Immune cell density does not discriminate between response groups. However, the Weibull SR metrics of CD8+ T cells or macrophages to their closest cancer cell positively associate with response. CD8+ T cells close to B cells are characteristic of non-response. We validate our SR response associations in a combination ICI cohort of head and neck tumors. Our data confirm that SRs, in contrast to density metrics, are strong biomarkers of response to pre-operative combination ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Gil-Jimenez
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nick van Dijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris L Vos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yoni Lubeck
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dennis Peters
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erik Hooijberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Zuur
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel J Vis
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benderska-Söder N, Ecke T, Kleinlein L, Roghmann F, Bismarck E, van Rhijn BWG, Stenzl A, Witjes JA, Todenhöfer T, Hakenberg OW, Grimm MO, Goebell PJ, Burger M, Jensen JB, Schmitz-Dräger BJ. Simulation of the effects of molecular urine markers in follow-up of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00041-3. [PMID: 38403529 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
A plethora of urine markers for the management of patients with bladder cancer has been developed and studied in the past. However, the clinical impact of urine testing on patient management remains obscure. The goal of this manuscript is to identify scenarios for the potential use of molecular urine markers in the follow-up of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) and estimate potential risks and benefits. Information on the course of disease of patients with high-risk NMIBC and performance data of a point-of-care test (UBC rapid™), an MCM-5 directed ELISA (ADXBLADDER™), and 2 additional novel assays targeting alterations of mRNA expression and DNA methylation (Xpert bladder cancer monitor™, Epicheck™) were retrieved from high-quality trials and/or meta-analyses. In addition, the sensitivity of white light cystoscopy (WLC) and the impact of a urine marker result on the performance of WLC were estimated based on fluorescence cystoscopy data and information from the CeFub trial. This information was applied to different scenarios in patient follow-up and sensitivity, estimated number of cystoscopies, and the numbers needed to diagnose were calculated. The sensitivity of guideline-based regular follow-up (SOC) at 1 year was calculated at 96%. For different marker-supported strategies sensitivities ranging from 77% to 97.9% were estimated. Calculations suggest that several strategies are effective for the SOC. While for the SOC 24.6 WLCs were required to diagnose 1 tumor recurrence (NND), this NND dropped below 5 in some marker-supported strategies. Based on the results of this simulation, a marker-supported follow-up of patients with HR NMIBC is safe and offers the option to significantly reduce the number of WLCs. Further research focusing on prospective randomized trials is needed to finally find a way to implement urine markers into clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Klinikum, Bad Saarow, Germany; Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lisa Kleinlein
- Urologie 24, St. Theresienkrankenhaus, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter J Goebell
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- Urologie 24, St. Theresienkrankenhaus, Nürnberg, Germany; Studienpraxis Urologie, Nürtingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scheltema MJ, van Rhijn BWG. Electronic health record and research; happy marriage or early divorce? BJU Int 2024; 133 Suppl 3:75. [PMID: 37804138 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs J Scheltema
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eckstein M, Matek C, Wagner P, Erber R, Büttner-Herold M, Wild PJ, Taubert H, Wach S, Sikic D, Wullich B, Geppert CI, Compérat EM, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Cheng L, van der Kwast T, Colecchia M, van Rhijn BWG, Amin MB, Netto GJ, Lehmann J, Stöckle M, Junker K, Hartmann A, Bertz S. Proposal for a Novel Histological Scoring System as a Potential Grading Approach for Muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer Correlating with Disease Aggressiveness and Patient Outcomes. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:128-138. [PMID: 37562993 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grading of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) according to the current World Health Organization (WHO) criteria is controversial due to its limited prognostic value. All MIBC cases except a tiny minority are of high grade. OBJECTIVE To develop a prognostic histological scoring system for MIBC integrating histomorphological phenotype, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs), tumor budding, and growth and spreading patterns. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Tissue specimens and clinical data of 484 patients receiving cystectomy and lymphadenectomy with curative intent with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Histomorphological phenotypes, sTILs, tumor budding, and growth and spreading patterns were evaluated and categorized into four grade groups (GGs). GGs were correlated with molecular subtypes, immune infiltration, immune checkpoint expression, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) activity. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS GGs were associated with overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS), and progression-free (PFS) survival in univariable and multivariable analyses. Association with biological features was analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Integration of two histomorphological tumor groups, three sTILs groups, three tumor budding groups, and four growth/spread patterns yielded four novel GGs that had high significance in the univariable survival analysis (OS, DSS, and PFS). GGs were confirmed as independent prognostic predictors with the greatest effect in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Correlation with molecular data showed a gradual transition from basal to luminal subtypes from GG1 to GG4; a gradual decrease in survival, immune infiltration, and immune checkpoint activity; and a gradual increase in ECM remodeling and EMT activity. CONCLUSIONS We propose a novel, prognostically relevant, and biologically based scoring system for MIBC in cystectomies applicable to routine pathological sections. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed a novel approach to assess the aggressiveness of advanced bladder cancer, which allows improved risk stratification compared with the method currently proposed by the World Health Organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Matek
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Wagner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maike Büttner-Herold
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany; Department of Nephropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter J Wild
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology (SIP), University Hospital Frankfurt & Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Helge Taubert
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sven Wach
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carol I Geppert
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba University, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, c/o Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA; The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mahul B Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Urology, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - George J Netto
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jan Lehmann
- Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Prüner Gang, Kiel, Germany; Department of Urology, Städtisches Krankenhaus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Kerstin Junker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simone Bertz
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Contieri R, Martini A, Mertens LS, Giannatempo P, Hurle R, Witjes JA, Ribal MJ, van Rhijn BWG, Malavaud B. The Financial Burden of Guideline-recommended Cancer Medications for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(23)00292-4. [PMID: 38199886 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a significant global health concern owing to its prevalence, negative impact on quality of life, and high treatment costs. Treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) traditionally relies on platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. However, clinical trial results have led to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as viable treatment options. We assessed the escalating costs and economic viability of mUC treatment guidelines in Europe. We used a pragmatic approach that involved: (1) collection of the costs of the recommended medications in the five most populous European countries; (2) conversion of the costs into international dollars to account for differences in purchasing power parity among countries; (3) evaluation of the cost trends over time; and (4) comparison of the medication costs to World Health Organization thresholds. Introduction of ICIs in European guidelines substantially increased the cost of medications for mUC. Intriguingly, important differences across European countries emerged: the annual cost of medications was twofold higher in Italy than in France and the UK. Despite limitations, our study sheds light on the escalating costs and economic challenges of mUC treatment, and highlights the need for assessments of sustainable and cost-effective management approaches. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the costs of treatments for metastatic bladder cancer and found that costs have been rising over time, especially with the introduction of new immune therapies, with notable differences among European countries. While these new treatments improve patient outcomes, they also come with a high price tag, which could strain health care budgets. Our results suggest that cost-effectiveness studies will be essential in determining the best and most sustainable treatment strategies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernard Malavaud
- Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Dorp J, Pipinikas C, Suelmann BBM, Mehra N, van Dijk N, Marsico G, van Montfoort ML, Hackinger S, Braaf LM, Amarante T, van Steenis C, McLay K, Daletzakis A, van den Broek D, van de Kamp MW, Hendricksen K, de Feijter JM, Boellaard TN, Meijer RP, van der Heijden AG, Rosenfeld N, van Rhijn BWG, Jones G, van der Heijden MS. Author Correction: High- or low-dose preoperative ipilimumab plus nivolumab in stage III urothelial cancer: the phase 1B NABUCCO trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:304. [PMID: 37460757 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02500-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen van Dorp
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Britt B M Suelmann
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niven Mehra
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nick van Dijk
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maurits L van Montfoort
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linde M Braaf
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Antonios Daletzakis
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeantine M de Feijter
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antoine G van der Heijden
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nitzan Rosenfeld
- Inivata Ltd., Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Major Centre Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Greg Jones
- Inivata Ltd., Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Devlies W, de Jong JJ, Hofmann F, Bruins HM, Zuiverloon TCM, Smith EJ, Yuan Y, van Rhijn BWG, Mostafid H, Santesso N, Violette P, Omar MI. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Cystoscopy for Detecting Bladder Cancer in Adults Presenting with Haematuria: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Office. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:115-122. [PMID: 37633791 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Haematuria can be macroscopic (visible haematuria [VH]) or microscopic (nonvisible haematuria [NVH]), and may be caused by a number of underlying aetiologies. Currently, in case of haematuria, cystoscopy is the standard diagnostic tool to screen the entire bladder for malignancy. OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review is to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of cystoscopy (compared with other tests, eg, computed tomography, urine biomarkers, and urine cytology) for detecting bladder cancer in adults. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension for diagnostic test accuracy studies' checklist. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane CDSR databases (via Ovid) were searched up to July 13, 2022. The population comprises patients presenting with either VH or NVH, without previous urological cancers. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, searched reference lists of retrieved articles, and performed data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Seven out of nine included trials covered the use of cystoscopy in comparison with radiological imaging. Overall, sensitivity of cystoscopy ranged from 87% to 100%, specificity from 64% to 100%, positive predictive value from 79% to 98%, and negative predictive values between 98% and 100%. Two trials compared enhanced or air cystoscopy versus conventional cystoscopy. Overall sensitivity of conventional white light cystoscopy ranged from 47% to 100% and specificity from 93.4% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS The true accuracy of cystoscopy for the detection of bladder cancer within the context of haematuria has not been studied extensively, resulting in inconsistent data regarding its performance for patients with haematuria. In comparison with imaging modalities, a few trials have prospectively assessed the diagnostic performance of cystoscopy, confirming very high accuracy for cystoscopy, exceeding the diagnostic value of any other imaging test. PATIENT SUMMARY Evidence of tests for detecting bladder cancer in adults presenting with haematuria (blood in urine) was reviewed. The most common test used was cystoscopy, which remains the current standard for diagnosing bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wout Devlies
- Department of Urology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joep J de Jong
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harman Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nancy Santesso
- Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Phil Violette
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Downes MR, Hartmann A, Shen S, Tsuzuki T, van Rhijn BWG, Bubendorf L, van der Kwast TH, Cheng L. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Current Issues in Bladder Cancer. Working Group 1: Comparison of Bladder Cancer Grading System Performance. Am J Surg Pathol 2024; 48:e1-e10. [PMID: 37246824 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Grade is a key prognostic factor in determining progression in nonmuscle invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas. The 2 most common grading methods in use worldwide are the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 and 1973 schemes. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) organized the 2022 consensus conference in Basel, Switzerland on current issues in bladder cancer and tasked working group 1 to make recommendations for future iterations of bladder cancer grading. For this purpose, the ISUP developed in collaboration with the European Association of Urology a 10-question survey for their memberships to understand the current use of grading schemes by pathologists and urologists and to ascertain the areas of potential improvements. An additional survey was circulated to the ISUP membership for their opinion on interobserver variability in grading, reporting of urine cytology, and challenges encountered in grade assignment. Comprehensive literature reviews were performed on bladder cancer grading prognosis and interobserver variability along with The Paris System for urine cytology. There are notable differences in practice patterns between North American and European pathologists in terms of used grading scheme and diagnosis of papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential. Areas of common ground include difficulty in grade assignment, a desire to improve grading criteria, and a move towards subclassifying high-grade urothelial carcinomas. The surveys and in-person voting demonstrated a strong preference to refine current grading into a 3-tier scheme with the division of WHO 2004 high grade into clinically relevant categories. More variable opinions were voiced regarding the use of papillary urothelial carcinoma with low malignant potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Downes
- Precision Diagnostics & Therapeutics Program, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Steven Shen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Aichi Prefecture, Japan
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Theodorus H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eckstein M, Matek C, Wagner P, Erber R, Büttner-Herold M, Wild PJ, Taubert H, Wach S, Sikic D, Wullich B, Geppert CI, Compérat EM, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Cheng L, van der Kwast T, Colecchia M, van Rhijn BWG, Amin MB, Netto GJ, Lehmann J, Stöckle M, Junker K, Hartmann A, Bertz S. Corrigendum to "Proposal for a Novel Histological Scoring System as a Potential Grading Approach for Muscle-invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer Correlating with Disease Aggressiveness and Patient Outcomes" [European Urology Oncology (2023)]. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:641. [PMID: 37813744 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Matek
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Wagner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maike Büttner-Herold
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany; Department of Nephropathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter J Wild
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology (SIP), University Hospital Frankfurt & Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Helge Taubert
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sven Wach
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Danijel Sikic
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carol I Geppert
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonio Lopez-Beltran
- Unit of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cordoba University, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, c/o Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI, USA; The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mahul B Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA; Department of Urology, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - George J Netto
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jan Lehmann
- Urologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Prüner Gang, Kiel, Germany; Department of Urology, Städtisches Krankenhaus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Kerstin Junker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simone Bertz
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Vries HM, Rafael TS, Gil-Jimenez A, de Feijter JM, Bekers E, van der Laan E, Lopez-Yurda M, Hooijberg E, Broeks A, Peters D, Seignette IM, Pos FJ, Horenblas S, van Rhijn BWG, Jordanova ES, Brouwer OR, Schaake E, van der Heijden MS. Atezolizumab With or Without Radiotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis (The PERICLES Study): A Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4872-4880. [PMID: 37487169 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma have a poor prognosis (21% 2-year overall survival [OS] from diagnosis). We assessed the activity of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) in patients with advanced penile cancer, with or without radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS A single-center, nonrandomized phase II study with two treatment arms was conducted in 32 patients with histologically confirmed advanced penile cancer. All patients received atezolizumab (1,200 mg) once every 3 weeks. Twenty patients, who were expected to benefit from RT for locoregional disease control, received additional irradiation. The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the complete cohort and was reached if the actual 1-year PFS was at least 35%. Secondary end points included OS, objective response rate (ORR), and tolerability. Exploratory biomarker analyses were conducted in pretreatment specimens. RESULTS Median follow-up was 29.1 months (IQR, 18.1-33.5). Grade 3-4 adverse events related to atezolizumab or RT were observed in 3/32 (9.4%) and 13/20 (65%) patients, respectively. One-year PFS was 12.5% (95% CI, 5.0 to 31.3), which did not meet the study's primary end point. Median OS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 18.7). In the objective response-evaluable population (n = 30; 93.8%), the ORR was 16.7% (95% CI, 6 to 35), including 2 (6.7%) complete responders and 3 (10%) partial responders. Improved PFS was observed in patients with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive tumors (P = .003) and those with high infiltration of intratumoral CD3+CD8+ T cells (P = .037). CONCLUSION Although the primary end point of 1-year PFS was not met, durable antitumor activity to atezolizumab was observed in a subset of patients. Biomarkers, such as hrHPV and intratumoral CD3+CD8+ T-cell infiltration, may help to better select responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hielke M de Vries
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tynisha S Rafael
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alberto Gil-Jimenez
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeantine M de Feijter
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elise Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elsbeth van der Laan
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Lopez-Yurda
- Department of Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Hooijberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis Peters
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris M Seignette
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Therapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ekaterina S Jordanova
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Schaake
- Department of Radiation Therapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Richters A, van Ginkel N, Meijer RP, Wondergem M, Schoots I, Vis AN, Kiemeney LALM, van Rhijn BWG, Witjes JA, Aben KKH, Mertens LS. Staging fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a nationwide population-based study. BJU Int 2023; 132:420-427. [PMID: 37246479 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide insight into the use and staging information on lymph-node involvement added by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), based on a nationwide population-based cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analysed a nationwide cohort of patients with MIBC without signs of distant metastases, newly diagnosed in the Netherlands between November 2017 and October 2019. From this cohort, we selected patients who underwent pre-treatment staging with CT only or CT and FDG-PET/CT. The distribution of patients, disease characteristics, imaging findings, nodal status (clinical nodal stage cN0 vs cN+) and treatment were described for each imaging modality group (CT only vs CT and FDG-PET/CT). RESULTS We identified 2731 patients with MIBC: 1888 (69.1%) underwent CT only; 606 (22.2%) underwent CT and FDG-PET/CT, 237 (8.6%) underwent no CT. Of the patients who underwent CT only, 200/1888 (10.6%) were staged as cN+, vs 217/606 (35.8%) who underwent CT and FDG-PET/CT. Stratified analysis showed that this difference was found in patients with clinical tumour stage (cT)2 as well as cT3/4 MIBC. Of patients who underwent both imaging modalities and were staged with CT as cN0, 109/498 (21.9%) were upstaged to cN+ based on FDG-PET/CT. Radical cystectomy (RC) was the most common treatment within both imaging groups. Preoperative chemotherapy was more frequently applied in cN+ disease and in FDG-PET/CT-staged patients. Concordance of pathological N stage after upfront RC was higher among patients staged as cN+ with CT and FDG-PET/CT (50.0% pN+) than those staged as cN+ with only CT (39.3%). CONCLUSION Patients with MIBC who underwent pre-treatment staging with FDG-PET/CT were more often staged as lymph node positive, regardless of cT stage. In patients with MIBC who underwent CT and FDG-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT led to clinical nodal upstaging in approximately one-fifth. Additional imaging findings may influence subsequent treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Richters
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Noor van Ginkel
- Department of Urology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncologic Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo Schoots
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Claps F, Pavan N, Ongaro L, Tierno D, Grassi G, Trombetta C, Tulone G, Simonato A, Bartoletti R, Mertens LS, van Rhijn BWG, Mir MC, Scaggiante B. BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Treatment Landscape and Novel Emerging Molecular Targets. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12596. [PMID: 37628785 PMCID: PMC10454200 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the sixth most common cancer in Western countries, includes upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder carcinoma (BC) as the most common cancers among UCs (90-95%). BC is the most common cancer and can be a highly heterogeneous disease, including both non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) forms with different oncologic outcomes. Approximately 80% of new BC diagnoses are classified as NMIBC after the initial transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBt). In this setting, intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the current standard treatment for intermediate- and high-risk patients. Unfortunately, recurrence occurs in 30% to 40% of patients despite adequate BCG treatment. Radical cystectomy (RC) is currently considered the standard treatment for NMIBC that does not respond to BCG. However, RC is a complex surgical procedure with a recognized high perioperative morbidity that is dependent on the patient, disease behaviors, and surgical factors and is associated with a significant impact on quality of life. Therefore, there is an unmet clinical need for alternative bladder-preserving treatments for patients who desire a bladder-sparing approach or are too frail for major surgery. In this review, we aim to present the strategies in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, focusing on novel molecular therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (F.C.); (L.O.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.S.M.); (B.W.G.v.R.)
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (N.P.); (G.T.); (A.S.)
| | - Luca Ongaro
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (F.C.); (L.O.); (C.T.)
| | - Domenico Tierno
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy;
| | - Gabriele Grassi
- Department of Medical, Surgery and Health Sciences, Hospital of Cattinara, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy;
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (F.C.); (L.O.); (C.T.)
| | - Gabriele Tulone
- Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (N.P.); (G.T.); (A.S.)
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (N.P.); (G.T.); (A.S.)
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.S.M.); (B.W.G.v.R.)
| | - Bas W. G. van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (L.S.M.); (B.W.G.v.R.)
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Ribera, 46600 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Bruna Scaggiante
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Claps F, van de Kamp MW, Mayr R, Bostrom PJ, Shariat SF, Hippe K, Bertz S, Neuzillet Y, Sanders J, Otto W, van der Heijden MS, Jewett MAS, Stöhr R, Zlotta AR, Trombetta C, Eckstein M, Mertens LS, Burger M, Soorojebally Y, Wullich B, Bartoletti R, Radvanyi F, Pavan N, Sirab N, Mir MC, Pouessel D, van der Kwast TH, Hartmann A, Lotan Y, Bussani R, Allory Y, van Rhijn BWG. Prognostic impact of variant histologies in urothelial bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2023; 132:170-180. [PMID: 36748180 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate variant histologies (VHs) for disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer (BCa) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We analysed a multi-institutional cohort of 1082 patients treated with upfront RC for cT1-4aN0M0 urothelial BCa at eight centres. Univariable and multivariable Cox' regression analyses were used to assess the effect of different VHs on DSS in overall cohort and three stage-based analyses. The stages were defined as 'organ-confined' (≤pT2N0), 'locally advanced' (pT3-4N0) and 'node-positive' (pTanyN1-3). RESULTS Overall, 784 patients (72.5%) had pure urothelial carcinoma (UC), while the remaining 298 (27.5%) harboured a VH. Squamous differentiation was the most common VH, observed in 166 patients (15.3%), followed by micropapillary (40 patients [3.7%]), sarcomatoid (29 patients [2.7%]), glandular (18 patients [1.7%]), lymphoepithelioma-like (14 patients [1.3%]), small-cell (13 patients [1.2%]), clear-cell (eight patients [0.7%]), nested (seven patients [0.6%]) and plasmacytoid VH (three patients [0.3%]). The median follow-up was 2.3 years. Overall, 534 (49.4%) disease-related deaths occurred. In uni- and multivariable analyses, plasmacytoid and small-cell VHs were associated with worse DSS in the overall cohort (both P = 0.04). In univariable analyses, sarcomatoid VH was significantly associated with worse DSS, while lymphoepithelioma-like VH had favourable DSS compared to pure UC. Clear-cell (P = 0.015) and small-cell (P = 0.011) VH were associated with worse DSS in the organ-confined and node-positive cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS More than 25% of patients harboured a VH at time of RC. Compared to pure UC, clear-cell, plasmacytoid, small-cell and sarcomatoid VHs were associated with worse DSS, while lymphoepithelioma-like VH was characterized by a DSS benefit. Accurate pathological diagnosis of VHs may ensure tailored counselling to identify patients who require more intensive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter J Bostrom
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Katrin Hippe
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center - Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simone Bertz
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yanish Soorojebally
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology & Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Unit of Urology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - François Radvanyi
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nanour Sirab
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rossana Bussani
- Department of Pathology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stokkel LE, van Rossum HH, van de Kamp MW, Boellaard TN, Bekers EM, Kok NFM, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. Clinical value of preoperative serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 in surgically treated urachal cancer. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:326.e17-326.e24. [PMID: 36813613 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urachal adenocarcinoma (UrAC) is a very rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. The role of preoperative serum tumor markers (STMs) in UrAC is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of elevated STMs including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) in surgically treated UrAC, and to evaluate their prognostic significance. METHODS This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed UrAC who underwent surgical treatment at a single tertiary hospital. Blood levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 were determined before surgery. The proportion of patients with elevated STMs was calculated, as well as the association between elevated STMs and clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival. RESULTS Of the 50 patients included; CEA, CA 19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 were elevated in 40%, 25%, 26%, and 6% respectively. Elevated CEA was associated with higher pT-stage (odds ratio [OR] 3.3 [95% confidence interval 1.0-11.1], P = 0.003), higher Sheldon stage (OR 6.9 [95% CI 0.8-60.4], P = 0.01), male sex (OR 4.7 [95% CI 1.2-18.3], P = 0.01), and the presence of peritoneal metastases at the time of diagnosis (OR 3.5 [95% CI 0.9-14.2], P = 0.04). Elevated CA19-9 was associated with signet-cell component (OR 1.7 [95% CI 0.9-3.3], P = 0.03) and elevated CA125 was associated with peritoneal metastases at the time of diagnosis (OR 6.0 [95% CI 1.2-30.6], P = 0.04). Elevated STMs before surgery were not associated with recurrence-free survival and/or disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION A subset of patients with surgically treated UrAC has elevated STMs preoperatively. CEA was most frequently (40%) elevated and correlated with unfavorable tumor characteristics. However, STM levels did not correlate with prognostic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Stokkel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Huub H van Rossum
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise M Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mellema JJJ, van Rhijn BWG, van der Heijden MS. Recent developments in perioperative combination therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2023:00042307-990000000-00095. [PMID: 37265341 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A summary of recent literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of systemic perioperative treatment combinations for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). RECENT FINDINGS We discuss recent developments in standard and experimental treatment modalities. The VESPER trial has shown that six cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense MVAC are superior to four cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC), though it is unclear whether the superiority is derived from the specific regimen or number of cycles. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, a subject of longstanding debate, was shown to have comparable overall survival-benefit to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in an updated meta-analysis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 show encouraging results, but with no comparative studies to standard care, context is lacking. Immunotherapeutic neoadjuvant anti-CTLA-4/PD-(L)1 combinations or combinations of checkpoint inhibitors with antibody-drug-conjugates are in early stages of development and show promising preliminary results. SUMMARY Six cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense MVAC are superior to four cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin. Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is a viable option for patients with high-risk tumours who did not receive prior neoadjuvant treatment. The added value of anti-PD-(L)1 to chemotherapy still needs to be established. Novel developments in immunotherapy combinations, while promising, are still in an early stage and randomized studies are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Claps F, Rossin G, van Rhijn BWG, Mir MC, Mertens LS, Ongaro L, Traunero F, Iachimovsky AI, Piasentin A, Vedovo F, Perotti A, Tulone G, Zucchi A, Liguori G, Simonato A, Bartoletti R, Trombetta C, Pavan N. The Utility of Inflammatory Serum Markers in the Assessment of Perioperative Morbidity after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59:medicina59050926. [PMID: 37241158 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To date, sparse evidence exists about the impact of inflammatory serum markers in predicting perioperative complications after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). Here, we evaluated the role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma fibrinogen in predicting perioperative morbidity and unplanned 30-days readmission after RC for BC. Materials and methods: We relied on a collaborative database of 271 patients who underwent open RC for cT1-4a N0 M0 BC between January 2012 and December 2022. Univariable and multivariable binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) testing the ability of each serum marker to predict postoperative complications (any-grade and major complications), and 30-days unplanned readmission. Results: The median age at RC was 73 yr (IQR 67-79). A total of 182 (67.2%) patients were male and the median BMI was 25.2 (IQR 23.2-28.4). Overall, 172 (63.5%) patients had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) greater than 2 points and 98 (36.2%) were current smokers at the time of RC. Overall, 233 (86.0%) patients experienced at least one complication after RC. Of these, 171 (63.1%) patients had minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2) while 100 (36.9%) experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3). According to multivariable analysis, current smoking status, high plasma fibrinogen, and preoperative anemia were independently associated with major complications (OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.15-4.90, p = 0.02), (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.26-1.98, p = 0.09), and (OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.17-2.57, p = 0.03), respectively. Overall, 56 (20.7%) patients experienced a 30-days unplanned readmission. According to univariable analysis, high preoperative CRP and hyperfibrinogenemia were significantly associated with an increased risk of unplanned readmission (OR 2.15, 95%CI 1.15-4.16, p = 0.02; OR 2.18, 95%CI 1.13-4.44, p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: In our study, the preoperative immune-inflammation signature described by NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and CRP showed a low reliability in predicting perioperative course after RC. Preoperative anemia and hyperfibrinogenemia were independent predictors of major complications. Further studies are pending in order to draw definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giulio Rossin
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Ribera, 46600 Valencia, Spain
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Ongaro
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Fabio Traunero
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alexandra I Iachimovsky
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Andrea Piasentin
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Francesca Vedovo
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alessandro Perotti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tulone
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zucchi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Einerhand SMH, Zuur LG, Wondergem MJ, Boellaard TN, Barwari K, van Leeuwen PJ, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. The Implementation of FDG PET/CT for Staging Bladder Cancer: Changes in the Detection and Characteristics of Occult Nodal Metastases at Upfront Radical Cystectomy? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103367. [PMID: 37240473 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Occult lymph node (LN)-metastases are frequently found after upfront radical cystectomy (uRC) for bladder cancer (BC). We evaluated whether the implementation of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) influenced nodal staging at uRC. All consecutive BC patients who underwent uRC with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) were identified and divided into two cohorts: cohort A consisted of patients staged with FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) (2016-2021); cohort B consisted of patients staged with CE-CT only (2006-2011). The diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT was assessed and compared with that of CE-CT. Thereafter, we calculated the occult LN metastases proportions for both cohorts. In total, 523 patients were identified (cohort A n = 237, and cohort B n = 286). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FDG PET/CT for detecting LN metastases were 23%, 92%, 42%, and 83%, respectively, versus 15%, 93%, 33%, 81%, respectively, for CE-CT. Occult LN metastases were found in 17% of cohort A (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.2-22.8) and 22% of cohort B (95% CI 16.9-27.1). The median size of LN metastases was 4 mm in cohort A versus 13 mm in cohort B. After introduction of FDG PET/CT, fewer and smaller occult LN metastases were present after uRC. Nevertheless, up to one-fifth of occult (micro-)metastases were still missed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M H Einerhand
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte G Zuur
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits J Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kurdo Barwari
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gil-Jimenez A, van Dorp J, Contreras-Sanz A, van der Vos K, Vis DJ, Braaf L, Broeks A, Kerkhoven R, van Kessel KEM, Ribal MJ, Alcaraz A, Wessels LFA, Seiler R, Wright JL, Mengual L, Boormans J, van Rhijn BWG, Black PC, van der Heijden MS. Assessment of Predictive Genomic Biomarkers for Response to Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2023; 83:313-317. [PMID: 35965206 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy is recommended for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). It has been shown that somatic deleterious mutations in ERCC2, gain-of-function mutations in ERBB2, and alterations in ATM, RB1, and FANCC are correlated with pathological response to NAC in MIBC. The objective of this study was to validate these genomic biomarkers in pretreatment transurethral resection material from an independent retrospective cohort of 165 patients with MIBC who subsequently underwent NAC and radical surgery. Patients with ypT0/Tis/Ta/T1N0 disease after surgery were defined as responders. Somatic deleterious mutations in ERCC2 were found in nine of 68 (13%) evaluable responders and two of 95 (2%) evaluable nonresponders (p = 0.009; FDR = 0.03). No correlation was observed between response and alterations in ERBB2 or in ATM, RB1, or FANCC alone or in combination. In an exploratory analysis, no additional genomic alterations discriminated between responders and nonresponders to NAC. No further associations were identified between the aforementioned biomarkers and pathological complete response (ypT0N0) after surgery. In conclusion, we observed a positive association between deleterious mutations in ERCC2 and pathological response to NAC, but not overall survival or recurrence-free survival. Other previously reported genomic biomarkers were not validated. PATIENT SUMMARY: It is currently unknown which patients will respond to chemotherapy before definitive surgery for bladder cancer. Previous studies described several gene mutations in bladder cancer that correlated with chemotherapy response. This study confirmed that patients with bladder cancer with a mutation in the ERCC2 gene often respond to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Gil-Jimenez
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Dorp
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Contreras-Sanz
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kristan van der Vos
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Vis
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linde Braaf
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Kerkhoven
- Core Facility Genomics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim E M van Kessel
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - María José Ribal
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Seiler
- Department of BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Hospital Center Biel, Biel, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lourdes Mengual
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joost Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter C Black
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mertens LS, Claps F, Mayr R, Hodgson A, Shariat SF, Hippe K, Neuzillet Y, Sanders J, Burger M, Pouessel D, Otto W, van der Kwast TH, Lotan Y, Allory Y, Downes MR, van Rhijn BWG. The Search for the Optimal cut-off Value of p53-Immunohistochemistry to Predict Prognosis of Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multi-Center, Multi-Laboratory Analysis. Int J Surg Pathol 2023; 31:157-166. [PMID: 35466737 DOI: 10.1177/10668969221095173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Mutations in the TP53 gene are indicative of worse outcome in bladder cancer and are usually assessed by immunohistochemistry. To define p53-overexpression, a threshold of >10% is most commonly used (cut-off1). Recently, a novel cut-off (aberrant = 0% or ≥50%) (cut-off2) showed better correlation to clinical outcome. In this study, we evaluate the association between p53-immunohistochemistry cut-offs, clinico-pathological variables and disease-specific survival (DSS). Methods: Seven-hundred-fifty chemotherapy-naïve patients who underwent radical cystectomy were included (92% muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In addition to cut-off1 and cut-off2, a third cut-off (cut-off3) was determined based on the highest Youden-index value. Cut-off values were associated with clinico-pathological variables and FGFR3 mutation status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DSS. Results: Aberrant p53-expression was found in 489 (65%) (cut-off1) and 466 (62%) (cut-off2) tumors. Cut-off3 was determined at 25% and aberrant p53-expression in 410 cases (55%) (cutoff3). p53-expression levels were significantly associated with higher pT-stage (cut-off1/2/3: P = 0.047, P = 0.006 and P = 0.0002, respectively), higher grade (all, P < 0.0001), and FGFR3 wild-type (cut-off1: P = 0.02, cut-offs2&3: P = 0.001). Median follow-up was 5.3 years (interquartile range, 4.0-6.0 years). p53-expression was not associated with DSS for any of the three cut-offs (cut-off1/2/3: P-log-rank = 0.566, 0.77 and 0.50, respectively). If we only considered locally advanced bladder cancer, results on DSS remained non-significant. Conclusion: This multi-center, multi-laboratory study showed that, regardless of the cut-off used, p53-immunohistochemistry did not enable selection of patients with worse outcome. Our results suggest that p53-immunohistochemistry alone is not suitable to guide clinical decision making after radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Anjelica Hodgson
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Katrin Hippe
- Dept. Pathology, University Medical Center - Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Hôpital Foch, UVSQ-Paris-Saclay University, Suresnes, France
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - Michelle R Downes
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, 9147University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Birtle AJ, Capoun O, Compérat EM, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Gürses Andersson I, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Hugh Mostafid A, Pradere B, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Rai BP, Soria F, Soukup V, Wood RG, Xylinas EN, Masson-Lecomte A, Gontero P. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 84:S0302-2838(23)02652-0. [PMID: 36967359 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 85.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alison J Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris
| | | | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Department of Urology, Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Evanguelos N Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gil-Jimenez A, van Dorp J, Contreras-Sanz A, van der Vos K, Vis DJ, Braaf L, Broeks A, Kerkhoven R, van Kessel KEM, Ribal MJ, Alcaraz A, Wessels LFA, Seiler R, Wright JL, Mengual L, Boormans J, van Rhijn BWG, Black PC, van der Heijden MS. Corrigendum to "Assessment of Predictive Genomic Biomarkers for Response to Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bladder Cancer" [Eur Urol 2023;83:313-17]. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e165. [PMID: 36907692 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Gil-Jimenez
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Dorp
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Contreras-Sanz
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kristan van der Vos
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Vis
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linde Braaf
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Kerkhoven
- Core Facility Genomics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim E M van Kessel
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - María José Ribal
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Seiler
- Department of BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Hospital Center Biel, Biel, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lourdes Mengual
- Laboratory and Department of Urology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joost Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter C Black
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre and Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Dorp J, Pipinikas C, Suelmann BBM, Mehra N, van Dijk N, Marsico G, van Montfoort ML, Hackinger S, Braaf LM, Amarante T, van Steenis C, McLay K, Daletzakis A, van den Broek D, van de Kamp MW, Hendricksen K, de Feijter JM, Boellaard TN, Meijer RP, van der Heijden AG, Rosenfeld N, van Rhijn BWG, Jones G, van der Heijden MS. High- or low-dose preoperative ipilimumab plus nivolumab in stage III urothelial cancer: the phase 1B NABUCCO trial. Nat Med 2023; 29:588-592. [PMID: 36732628 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02199-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Cohort 1 of the phase 1B NABUCCO trial showed high pathological complete response (pCR) rates with preoperative ipilimumab plus nivolumab in stage III urothelial cancer (UC). In cohort 2, the aim was dose adjustment to optimize responses. Additionally, we report secondary endpoints, including efficacy and tolerability, in cohort 2 and the association of presurgical absence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in urine and plasma with clinical outcome in both cohorts. Thirty patients received two cycles of either ipilimumab 3 mg kg-1 plus nivolumab 1 mg kg-1 (cohort 2A) or ipilimumab 1 mg kg-1 plus nivolumab 3 mg kg-1 (cohort 2B), both followed by nivolumab 3 mg kg-1. We observed a pCR in six (43%) patients in cohort 2A and a pCR in one (7%) patient in cohort 2B. Absence of urinary ctDNA correlated with pCR in the bladder (ypT0Nx) but not with progression-free survival (PFS). Absence of plasma ctDNA correlated with pCR (odds ratio: 45.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9-416.5) and PFS (hazard ratio: 10.4; 95% CI: 2.9-37.5). Our data suggest that high-dose ipilimumab plus nivolumab is required in stage III UC and that absence of ctDNA in plasma can predict PFS. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03387761 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen van Dorp
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Britt B M Suelmann
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niven Mehra
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nick van Dijk
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maurits L van Montfoort
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linde M Braaf
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Antonios Daletzakis
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeantine M de Feijter
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urological Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antoine G van der Heijden
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nitzan Rosenfeld
- Inivata Ltd., Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Major Centre Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Greg Jones
- Inivata Ltd., Babraham Research Park, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sylvester RJ, Rodríguez O, Hernández V, Turturica D, Bauerová L, Max Bruins H, Bründl J, van der Kwast TH, Brisuda A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Hentschel AE, Kusuma VRM, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Volanis D, Cussenot O, Subiela Henríquez JD, de la Peña E, Pisano F, Pešl M, van der Heijden AG, Herdegen S, Zlotta AR, Hacek J, Calatrava A, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Ashabere D, Haitel A, Côté JF, El Sheikh S, Lunelli L, Algaba F, Alemany I, Soria F, Runneboom W, Breyer J, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Llorente C, Molinaro L, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Evert M, Kiemeney LALM, N'Dow J, Plass K, Čapoun O, Soukup V, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Cohen D, Palou J, Gontero P, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Mostafid AH, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M, Compérat EM, Babjuk M, van Rhijn BWG. Erratum to "European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel" [Eur. Urol. 79(4) (2021) 480-488]. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e140-e141. [PMID: 36841687 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Amir Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
van Ginkel N, van Gennep EJ, Oosterbaan L, Greidanus J, Boellaard TN, Wondergem M, Vis AN, de Reijke TM, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. Added Clinical Value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT to Stage Patients With High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Before Radical Cystectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:342-348. [PMID: 36918302 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is increasingly used in the preoperative staging of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The clinical added value of FDG-PET/CT in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is unknown. In this study, the value of FDG-PET/CT in addition to contrast enhanced (CE)-CT was evaluated in high-risk NMIBC before radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with high risk and very-high risk urothelial NMIBC scheduled for RC in a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. Patients underwent staging with CE-CT (chest and abdomen/pelvis) and FDG-PET/CT. We assessed the clinical disease stage before and after FDG-PET/CT and the treatment recommendation based on the stage before and after FDG-PET/CT. The accuracy of CT and FDG-PET/CT for identifying metastatic disease was defined by the receiver-operating curve using a reference-standard including histopathology/cytology (if available), imaging and follow-up. RESULTS A total of 92 patients were identified (median age: 71 years). In 14/92 (15%) patients, FDG-PET/CT detected metastasis (12 suspicious lymph nodes and 4 distant metastases). The disease stage changed in 11/92 (12%) patients based on additional FDG-PET/CT findings. FDG-PET/CT led to a different treatment in 9/92 (10%) patients. According to the reference standard, 25/92 (27%) patients had metastases. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was 36%, 93% and 77% respectively, versus 12%, 97% and 74% of CE-CT only. The area under the ROC curve was 0.643 for FDG-PET/CT and 0.545 for CT, P = .036. CONCLUSION The addition of FDG-PET/CT to CE-CT imaging changed the treatment in 10% of patients and proved to be a valuable diagnostic tool in a selected subgroup of NMIBC patients scheduled for RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor van Ginkel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J van Gennep
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Leiden UMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Liselot Oosterbaan
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Greidanus
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Walraven JEW, Ripping TM, Oddens JR, van Rhijn BWG, Goossens-Laan CA, Hulshof MCCM, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Lemmens VEPP, van der Hoeven JJM, Desar IME, Aben KKH, Verhoeven RHA. The influence of multidisciplinary team meetings on treatment decisions in advanced bladder cancer. BJU Int 2023; 131:244-252. [PMID: 35861125 PMCID: PMC10087452 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the role of specialised genitourinary multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) in decision-making and identify factors that influence the probability of receiving a treatment plan with curative intent for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Data relating to patients with cT2-4aN0/X-1 M0 urothelial cell carcinoma, diagnosed between November 2017 and October 2019, were selected from the nationwide, population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry ('BlaZIB study'). Curative treatment options were defined as radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation or brachytherapy. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between MDTM factors and curative treatment advice and how this advice was followed. RESULTS Of the 2321 patients, 2048 (88.2%) were discussed in a genitourinary MDTM. Advanced age (>80 years) and poorer World Health Organization performance status (score 1-2 vs 0) were associated with no discussion (P < 0.001). Being discussed was associated with undergoing treatment with curative intent (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-4.9), as was the involvement of a RC hospital (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.09-2.65). Involvement of an academic centre was associated with higher rates of bladder-sparing treatment (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.21). Patient preference was the main reason for non-adherence to treatment advice. CONCLUSIONS For patients with MIBC, the probability of being discussed in a MDTM was associated with age, performance status and receiving treatment with curative intent, especially if a representative of a RC hospital was present. Future studies should focus on the impact of MDTM advice on survival data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke E W Walraven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Theodora M Ripping
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jorg R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus J M van der Hoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Claps F, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LALM, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. Prognosis of Primary Papillary Ta Grade 3 Bladder Cancer in the Non-muscle-invasive Spectrum. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:214-221. [PMID: 36670042 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a relatively rare diagnosis with an ambiguous character owing to the presence of an aggressive G3 component together with the lower malignant potential of the Ta component. The European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC guidelines recently changed the risk stratification for Ta G3 from high risk to intermediate, high, or very high risk. However, prognostic studies on Ta G3 carcinomas are limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of categorizing Ta G3 compared to Ta G2 and T1 G3 carcinomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta-T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals were analyzed. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Time to recurrence and time to progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox-regression models with interaction terms stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Ta G3 represented 7.5% (387/5170) of Ta-T1 carcinomas of which 42% were classified as intermediate risk. Time to recurrence did not differ between Ta G3 and Ta G2 (p = 0.9) or T1 G3 (p = 0.4). Progression at 5 yr occurred for 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-4.8%) of Ta G2, 13% (95% CI 9.3-17%) of Ta G3, and 20% (95% CI 17-23%) of T1 G3 carcinomas. Time to progression for Ta G3 was shorter than for Ta G2 (p < 0.001) and longer than for T1 G3 (p = 0.002). Patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) had worse prognosis and a similar time to progression as for patients with T1 G3 NMIBC with CIS (p = 0.5). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS The prognosis of Ta G3 tumors in terms of progression appears to be in between that of Ta G2 and T1 G3. However, patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant CIS have worse prognosis that is comparable to that of T1 G3 with CIS. Our results support the recent EAU NMIBC guideline changes for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 tumors because many of these patients have better prognosis than previously thought. PATIENT SUMMARY We used data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada to assess the prognosis for patients with stage Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Time to cancer progression for Ta G3 cancer differed from both Ta G2 and T1 G3 tumors. Our results support the recent change in the European Association of Urology guidelines for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 NMIBC because many patients with this tumor have better prognosis than previously thought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Deaprtment of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pickl C, Engelmann S, Girtner F, Gužvić M, van Rhijn BWG, Hartmann V, Holbach S, Kälble S, Haas M, Rosenhammer B, Breyer J, Burger M, Mayr R. Body Composition as a Comorbidity-Independent Predictor of Survival following Nephroureterectomy for Urothelial Cancer of the Upper Urinary Tract. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020450. [PMID: 36672398 PMCID: PMC9857333 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy (NUE) is the gold standard treatment for high-risk urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract (UTUC). Besides sarcopenia and frailty, fat distribution is moving increasingly into focus. Components of body composition were assessed in patients undergoing NUE due to UTUC. The study cohort included 142 patients. By using CT-based measurements, the skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), and visceral adipose tissue index (VATI) were measured at the height of the third lumbar vertebra. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using univariable und multivariable Cox regression models. The prevalence of sarcopenia in the study population (n = 142) was 37%. OS and CSS were significantly reduced in sarcopenic patients. In the multivariable cox regression analysis, including age, ACE-27, T-stage, R-stage, LVI and necrosis, sarcopenia remained a significant risk factor of OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI 1.02-3.07; p = 0.042) and CSS (HR, 2.17; 95% CI 1.18-3.99; p = 0.012). High visceral adipose tissue seems to be protective, although not statistically significant. Sarcopenia is a comorbidity-independent risk factor in patients who underwent NUE due to UTUC. Visceral fat represents a potentially protective factor. These results suggest that specific factors of body composition can be used for better risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Pickl
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simon Engelmann
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Florian Girtner
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Miodrag Gužvić
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bas W. G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valerie Hartmann
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Holbach
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kälble
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Haas
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Rosenhammer
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Landshuterstr. 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ecke TH, Benderska-Söder N, Bismarck E, van Rhijn BWG, Todenhöfer T, Schmitz-Dräger BJ. Considering the Effects of Modern Point-of-Care Urine Biomarker Assays in Follow-Up of Patients with High-Risk Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Methods Mol Biol 2023; 2684:199-212. [PMID: 37410236 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3291-8_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a plethora of urine markers for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer (BC) has been developed and studied, the clinical impact of urine testing on patient management remains unclear. The goal of this manuscript is to identify scenarios for a potential use of modern point-of-care (POC) urine marker assays in the follow-up of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) and estimate potential risks and benefits. METHODS To permit comparison between different assays, the results of 5 different POC assays studied in a recent prospective multicenter study including 127 patients with suspicious cystoscopy undergoing TURB were used for this simulation. For the current standard of care (SOC), a "marker-enforced" procedure, and a combined strategy sensitivity (Se), estimated number of cystoscopies, and the numbers needed to diagnose (NND) over a 1-year follow-up period were calculated. RESULTS For regular cystoscopy (SOC), a Se of 91.7% and a NND of 42.2 repetitive office cystoscopies (WLCs) for 1 recurrent tumor at 1 year were calculated. For the "marker-enforced" strategy, marker sensitivities between 94.7% and 97.1% were observed. The "combined" strategy yielded for markers with a Se exceeding 50% an overall Se at 1 year similar or superior to the current SOC. Savings regarding the number of cystoscopies in the "marker-enforced" strategy vs. the SOC were small, while, depending on the marker, up to 45% of all cystoscopies may be saved using the "combined" strategy. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this simulation, a marker-supported follow-up of patients with high-risk (HR) NMIBC is safe and offers options to significantly reduce the number of cystoscopies without compromising the Se. Further research focusing on prospective randomized trials is needed to finally find a way to include marker results into clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten H Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital, Bad Saarow, Germany.
- Department of Urology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin Charité, Berlin, Germany.
- German Study Group of Bladder Cancer (DFBK e.V.), Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Tilman Todenhöfer
- Studienpraxis Urologie, Nürtingen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- Urologie 24, Nürnberg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Claps F, Mir MC, van Rhijn BWG, Mazzon G, Soria F, D'Andrea D, Marra G, Boltri M, Traunero F, Massanova M, Liguori G, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Celia A, Gontero P, Shariat SF, Trombetta C, Pavan N. Impact of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score on perioperative morbidity and oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:49.e13-49.e22. [PMID: 36274030 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score on perioperative morbidity and oncological outcomes of bladder cancer (BC) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a multi-institutional cohort of 347 patients treated with RC for clinical-localized BC between 2005 and 2019. The CONUT-score was defined as an algorithm including serum albumin, total lymphocyte count, and cholesterol. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the ability of the CONUT-score to predict any-grade complications, major complications and 30 days readmission. Multivariable Cox' regression models were performed to evaluate the prognostic effect of the CONUT-score on recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS A cut-off value to discriminate between low and high CONUT-score was determined by calculating the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve was 0.72 hence high CONUT-score was defined as ≥3 points. Overall, 112 (32.3%) patients had a high CONUT. At multivariable logistic regression analyses, high CONUT was associated with any-grade complications (OR 3.58, P = 0.001), major complications (OR 2.56, P = 0.003) and 30 days readmission (OR 2.39, P = 0.01). On multivariable Cox' regression analyses, high CONUT remained associated with worse RFS (HR 2.57, P < 0.001), OS (HR 2.37, P < 0.001) and CSS (HR 3.52, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Poor nutritional status measured by the CONUT-score is independently associated with a poorer postoperative course after RC and is predictive of worse RFS, OS, and CSS. This simple index could serve as a comprehensive personalized risk-stratification tool identifying patients who may benefit from an intensified regimen of supportive cares.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Boltri
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Fabio Traunero
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Matteo Massanova
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Celia
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Einerhand SMH, van Dorp J, van der Heijden MS, van Rhijn BWG. Re: Neoadjuvant PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 Blockade in Patients with Cisplatin-ineligible Operable High-risk Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2023; 83:91-92. [PMID: 36210214 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M H Einerhand
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Dorp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Einerhand SMH, Black AJ, Zargar H, Fairey AS, Dinney CP, Mir MC, Krabbe LM, Cookson MS, Jacobson NE, Montgomery JS, Vasdev N, Yu EY, Xylinas E, Kassouf W, Dall'Era MA, Sridhar SS, McGrath JS, Aning J, Shariat SF, Wright JL, Thorpe AC, Morgan TM, Holzbeierlein JM, Bivalacqua TJ, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Grivas P, Garcia JA, Stephenson AJ, Shah JB, Daneshmand S, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Spiess PE, van Rhijn BWG, Black PC, Mertens LS. Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2022; 40:2707-2715. [PMID: 36169695 PMCID: PMC10874219 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04160-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, up to 50% of patients are cisplatin ineligible. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after ≥ 3 cycles of preoperative gemcitabine-carboplatin (gem-carbo) versus gemcitabine-cisplatin (gem-cis). METHODS We identified 1865 patients treated at 19 centers between 2000 and 2013. Patients were included if they had received ≥ 3 cycles of neoadjuvant (cT2-4aN0M0) or induction (cTanyN + M0) gem-carbo or gem-cis followed by RC. RESULTS We included 747 patients treated with gem-carbo (n = 147) or gem-cis (n = 600). Patients treated with gem-carbo had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.016) and more clinically node-positive disease (32% versus 20%; p = 0.013). The complete pathological response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate did not significantly differ between gem-carbo and gem-cis (20.7% versus 22.1%; p = 0.73). Chemotherapeutic regimen was not significantly associated with pCR (OR 0.99 [95%CI 0.61-1.59]; p = 0.96), overall survival (OS) (HR 1.20 [95%CI 0.85-1.67]; p = 0.31), or cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 1.35 [95%CI 0.93-1.96]; p = 0.11). Median OS of patients treated with gem-carbo and gem-cis was 28.6 months (95%CI 18.1-39.1) and 45.1 months (95%CI 32.7-57.6) (p = 0.18), respectively. Median CSS of patients treated with gem-carbo and gem-cis was 28.8 months (95%CI 9.8-47.8) and 71.0 months (95%CI median not reached) (p = 0.02), respectively. Subanalyses of the neoadjuvant and induction setting did not show significant survival differences. CONCLUSION Our results show that a subset of cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC achieve pCR on gem-carbo and that survival outcomes seem comparable to gem-cis provided patients are able to receive ≥ 3 cycles and undergo RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M H Einerhand
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Adrian S Fairey
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria C Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | | | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc A Dall'Era
- Department of Urology, David Medical Center, University of California at David, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan S McGrath
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Jonathan Aning
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew C Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeff M Holzbeierlein
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Scott North
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jorge A Garcia
- Department of Medicine, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, USA
| | | | - Jay B Shah
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Maxim Bruins H, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, A L M Kiemeney L, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. T1G1 Bladder Cancer: Prognosis for this Rare Pathological Diagnosis Within the Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Spectrum. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1627-1634. [PMID: 35577750 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathological existence and clinical consequence of stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer are the subject of debate. Even though the diagnosis of T1G1 is controversial, several reports have consistently found a prevalence of 2-6% G1 in their T1 series. However, it remains unclear if T1G1 carcinomas have added value as a separate category to predict prognosis within the non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) spectrum. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of T1G1 carcinomas compared to TaG1 and T1G2 carcinomas within the NMIBC spectrum. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta and T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals in Europe and Canada were analyzed. Transurethral resection (TUR) was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Time to recurrence and progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS T1G1 represented 1.9% (99/5170) of all carcinomas and 5.3% (99/1859) of T1 carcinomas. According to primary TUR dates, the proportion of T1G1 varied between 0.9% and 3.5% per year, with similar percentages in the early and later calendar years. We found no difference in time to recurrence between T1G1 and TaG1 (p = 0.91) or between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Time to progression significantly differed between TaG1 and T1G1 (p < 0.001) but not between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS The relative prevalence of T1G1 diagnosis was low and remained constant over the past three decades. Time to recurrence of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for other stage/grade NMIBC combinations. Time to progression of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for T1G2 but not for TaG1, suggesting that treatment and surveillance of T1G1 carcinomas should be more like the approaches for T1G2 NMIBC in accordance with the intermediate and/or high risk categories of the European Association of Urology NMIBC guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY Although rare, stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer is still diagnosed in daily clinical practice. Using individual patient data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada, we found that time to progression of T1G1 cancer was comparable to that for T1G2 but not TaG1 cancer. Therefore, our results suggest that primary T1G1 bladder cancers should be managed with more aggressive treatment and more frequent follow-up than for low-risk bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rai BP, Luis Dominguez Escrig J, Vale L, Kuusk T, Capoun O, Soukup V, Bruins HM, Yuan Y, Violette PD, Santesso N, van Rhijn BWG, Hugh Mostafid A, Imran Omar M. Systematic Review of the Incidence of and Risk Factors for Urothelial Cancers and Renal Cell Carcinoma Among Patients with Haematuria. Eur Urol 2022; 82:182-192. [PMID: 35393159 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The current impact of haematuria investigations on health care organisations is significant. There is currently no consensus on how to investigate patients with haematuria. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence of bladder cancer, upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) among patients undergoing investigation for haematuria and identify any risk factors for bladder cancer, UTUC, and RCC (BUR). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Medline, Embase, and Cochrane controlled trials databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for all relevant publications from January 1, 2000 to June 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies with a minimum population of 50 patients with haematuria were considered for the review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 44 studies were included. The total number of participants was 229701. The pooled incidence rate for urothelial bladder cancer was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-20%) for visible haematuria (VH) and 3.3% (95% CI 2.45-4.3%) for nonvisible haematuria (NVH). The pooled incidence rate for RCC was 2% (95% CI 1-2%) for VH and 0.58% (95% CI 0.42-0.77%) for NVH. The pooled incidence rate for UTUC was 0.75% (95% CI 0.4-1.2%) for VH and 0.17% (95% CI 0.081-0.299%) for NVH. On sensitivity analysis, the proportions of males (risk ratio [RR] 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.17 for VH; 1.54, 95% CI 1.34-1.78 for NVH; p < 0.00001; moderate certainty evidence) and individuals with a smoking history (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.24-1.61 for VH; 1.53, 95% CI 1.36-1.72 for NVH; p < 0.00001; moderate certainty evidence) appeared to be higher in BUR than in non-BUR groups. CONCLUSIONS Male gender and smoking history are risk factors for BUR cancer in haematuria, with bladder cancer being the commonest cancer. The incidence of RCC and UTUC in NVH is low. The review serves as a reference standard for future policy-making on investigation of haematuria by global organisations. PATIENT SUMMARY Our review shows that male gender and smoking history are risk factors for cancers of the bladder, kidney, and ureter. The review also provides information on the proportion of patients who have cancer when they have blood in their urine (haematuria) and will allow policy-makers to decide on the most appropriate method for investigating haematuria in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | | | - Luís Vale
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospital Universitário S. João, Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Teele Kuusk
- Department of Urology, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, Dartford, UK
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Harman M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen-Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe D Violette
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy Santesso
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Einerhand SMH, van Dijk N, van der Heijden MS, van Rhijn BWG. Reply to: Comments on "Neoadjuvant/Induction Combination Immunotherapy versus Combination Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced (Stage III) Urothelial Cancer.". Int J Cancer 2022; 151:1849-1850. [PMID: 35815942 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M H Einerhand
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nick van Dijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Dijk N, Gil-Jimenez A, Silina K, van Montfoort ML, Einerhand S, Jonkman L, Voskuilen CS, Peters D, Sanders J, Lubeck Y, Broeks A, Hooijberg E, Vis DJ, van den Broek M, Wessels LFA, van Rhijn BWG, van der Heijden MS. The Tumor Immune Landscape and Architecture of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Urothelial Cancer. Front Immunol 2022; 12:793964. [PMID: 34987518 PMCID: PMC8721669 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.793964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Candidate immune biomarkers have been proposed for predicting response to immunotherapy in urothelial cancer (UC). Yet, these biomarkers are imperfect and lack predictive power. A comprehensive overview of the tumor immune contexture, including Tertiary Lymphoid structures (TLS), is needed to better understand the immunotherapy response in UC. We analyzed tumor sections by quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence to characterize immune cell subsets in various tumor compartments in tumors without pretreatment and tumors exposed to preoperative anti-PD1/CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors (NABUCCO trial). Pronounced immune cell presence was found in UC invasive margins compared to tumor and stroma regions. CD8+PD1+ T-cells were present in UC, particularly following immunotherapy. The cellular composition of TLS was assessed by multiplex immunofluorescence (CD3, CD8, FoxP3, CD68, CD20, PanCK, DAPI) to explore specific TLS clusters based on varying immune subset densities. Using a k-means clustering algorithm, we found five distinct cellular composition clusters. Tumors unresponsive to anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 immunotherapy showed enrichment of a FoxP3+ T-cell-low TLS cluster after treatment. Additionally, cluster 5 (macrophage low) TLS were significantly higher after pre-operative immunotherapy, compared to untreated tumors. We also compared the immune cell composition and maturation stages between superficial (submucosal) and deeper TLS, revealing that superficial TLS had more pronounced T-helper cells and enrichment of early TLS than TLS located in deeper tissue. Furthermore, superficial TLS displayed a lower fraction of secondary follicle like TLS than deeper TLS. Taken together, our results provide a detailed quantitative overview of the tumor immune landscape in UC, which can provide a basis for further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick van Dijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alberto Gil-Jimenez
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Karina Silina
- Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Sarah Einerhand
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lars Jonkman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte S Voskuilen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dennis Peters
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yoni Lubeck
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erik Hooijberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Vis
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stokkel LE, van de Kamp MW, Schaake EE, Boellaard TN, Hendricksen K, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. Robot-Assisted Partial Cystectomy versus Open Partial Cystectomy for Patients with Urachal Cancer. Urol Int 2022; 106:840-847. [PMID: 35134799 DOI: 10.1159/000521605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Localized urachal cancer (UrC) can be treated with an open partial cystectomy (OPC) with en bloc resection of the urachal remnant and umbilicus. Robot-assisted partial cystectomy (RAPC) is an alternative approach, of which its safety and efficacy for UrC remains to be determined. In the present study, we analyze these outcomes after RAPC, compared with OPC. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 55 cN0M0 UrC patients who underwent RAPC (n = 8) or OPC (n = 47) between 1994 and 2020. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Positive surgical margins (PSM), port-site recurrences (PSR) versus wound recurrences were compared. Complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS Median follow-up was 40 months (IQR 21-95). Two-year OS and RFS for RAPC were 73% (95% confidence intervals (CI); 56-89 months) and 60% (95% CI; 42-78 months), respectively, versus 90% (95% CI; 85-95 months) and 66% (95% CI; 59-73 months) for OPC. PSM rate was 13% in both groups. PSR occurred in 2/8 (25%) patients after RAPC. No wound recurrences occurred after OPC. Postoperative complications occurred in 2/8 (25%) patients after RAPC, versus 5/47 (11%) after OPC (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION Both RAPC and OPC seem feasible surgical modalities to treat localized UrC with comparable survival. The PSR rate of 25% after RAPC should prompt us to be cautious to recommend RAPC as no such recurrences were seen using OPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Stokkel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva E Schaake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mertens LS, Claps F, Mayr R, Bostrom PJ, Shariat SF, Zwarthoff EC, Boormans JL, Abas C, van Leenders GJLH, Götz S, Hippe K, Bertz S, Neuzillet Y, Sanders J, Broeks A, Peters D, van der Heijden MS, Jewett MAS, Stöhr R, Zlotta AR, Eckstein M, Soorojebally Y, van der Schoot DKE, Wullich B, Burger M, Otto W, Radvanyi F, Sirab N, Pouessel D, van der Kwast TH, Hartmann A, Lotan Y, Allory Y, Zuiverloon TCM, van Rhijn BWG. Prognostic markers in invasive bladder cancer: FGFR3 mutation status versus P53 and KI-67 expression: a multi-center, multi-laboratory analysis in 1058 radical cystectomy patients. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:110.e1-110.e9. [PMID: 34906411 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the association between the FGFR3 mutation status and immuno-histochemistry (IHC) markers (p53 and Ki-67) in invasive bladder cancer (BC), and to analyze their prognostic value in a multicenter, multi-laboratory radical cystectomy (RC) cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 1058 cN0M0, chemotherapy-naive BC patients who underwent RC with pelvic lymph-node dissection at 8 hospitals. The specimens were reviewed by uro-pathologists. Mutations in the FGFR3 gene were examined using PCR-SNaPshot; p53 and Ki-67 expression were determined by standard IHC. FGFR3 mutation status as well as p53 (cut-off>10%) and Ki-67 (cut-off>20%) expression were correlated to clinicopathological parameters and disease specific survival (DSS). RESULTS pT-stage was <pT2 in 80, pT2 in 266, pT3 in 513 and pT4 in 199 patients, respectively. Cancer-positive nodes were found in 410 (39%) patients. An FGFR3 mutation was detected in 107 (10%) and aberrant p53 and Ki-67 expression in 718 (68%) and 581(55%) tumors, respectively. The FGFR3 mutation was associated with lower pT-stage (P<0.001), lower grade (P<0.001), pN0 (P=0.001) and prolonged DSS (P<0.001). Aberrant Ki-67 and p53 expression were associated with higher pT-stage and G3-tumors, but not with pN-stage or worse DSS, even if these IHC-biomarkers were combined (P=0.81). Significant predictors for DSS in multivariable analysis were pT-stage (HR1.5, 95%CI:1.3-1.6; P<0.001), lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) (HR1.4, 95%CI:1.2-1.7; P=0.001), pN-stage (HR1.9, 95%CI:1.6-2.4; P<0.001) and FGFR3 mutation status (HR1.6, 95%CI:1.1-2.2; P=0.011). CONCLUSION The FGFR3 mutation selectively identified patients with favorable BC at RC while p53 and Ki-67 were only associated with adverse tumor characteristics. Our results suggest that, besides tumor-stage, nodal-status and LVI, the oncogenic FGFR3 mutation may represent a valuable tool to guide adjuvant treatment and follow-up strategies after RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Mertens
- Dept. Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Dept. Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Dept. Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter J Bostrom
- Dept. Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dept. Urology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Dept. Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ellen C Zwarthoff
- Dept. of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Dept. Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cheno Abas
- Dept. of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert J L H van Leenders
- Dept. of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Götz
- Dept. Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Hippe
- Dept. Pathology, University Medical Center - Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simone Bertz
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Dept. Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Peters
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobank, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Dept. Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Dept. Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Dept. Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yanish Soorojebally
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Dept. Urology & Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Dept. Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Dept. Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - François Radvanyi
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Nanour Sirab
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Dept. Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Dept. Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yair Lotan
- Dept. Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical center, Dallas, TX
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology team, PSL Research University, Paris, France; Dept. Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Tahlita C M Zuiverloon
- Dept. of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Dept. Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Dept. Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Dept. Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Dept. Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van Dorp J, van Montfoort ML, van Dijk N, Hofland I, de Feijter JM, Bergman AM, Hendricksen K, van der Poel HG, van Rhijn BWG, van der Heijden MS. A Serendipitous Preoperative Trial of Combined Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab for Localized Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:e173-e179. [PMID: 35016887 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen van Dorp
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits L van Montfoort
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nick van Dijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid Hofland
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeantine M de Feijter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michiel S van der Heijden
- Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Dominguez Escrig JL, Gontero P, Liedberg F, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid AH, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Seisen T, Soukup V, Sylvester RJ. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol 2021; 81:75-94. [PMID: 34511303 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 466] [Impact Index Per Article: 155.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) has released an updated version of the guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). OBJECTIVE To present the 2021 EAU guidelines on NMIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of the NMIBC guidelines since the 2020 version was performed. Databases covered by the search included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and the level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Tumours staged as Ta, T1 and carcinoma in situ (CIS) are grouped under the heading of NMIBC. Diagnosis depends on cystoscopy and histological evaluation of tissue obtained via transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) for papillary tumours or via multiple bladder biopsies for CIS. For papillary lesions, a complete TURB is essential for the patient's prognosis and correct diagnosis. In cases for which the initial resection is incomplete, there is no muscle in the specimen, or a T1 tumour is detected, a second TURB should be performed within 2-6 wk. The risk of progression may be estimated for individual patients using the 2021 EAU scoring model. On the basis of their individual risk of progression, patients are stratified as having low, intermediate, high, or very high risk, which is pivotal to recommending adjuvant treatment. For patients with tumours presumed to be at low risk and for small papillary recurrences detected more than 1 yr after a previous TURB, one immediate chemotherapy instillation is recommended. Patients with an intermediate-risk tumour should receive 1 yr of full-dose intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy or instillations of chemotherapy for a maximum of 1 yr. For patients with high-risk tumours, full-dose intravesical BCG for 1-3 yr is indicated. For patients at very high risk of tumour progression, immediate radical cystectomy should be considered. Cystectomy is also recommended for BCG-unresponsive tumours. The extended version of the guidelines is available on the EAU website at https://uroweb.org/guideline/non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer/. CONCLUSIONS These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology has released updated guidelines on the classification, risk factors, diagnosis, prognostic factors, and treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The recommendations are based on the literature up to 2020, with emphasis on the highest level of evidence. Classification of patients as having low, intermediate, or and high risk is essential in deciding on suitable treatment. Surgical removal of the bladder should be considered for tumours that do not respond to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment and tumours with the highest risk of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Daniel Cohen
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Claps F, van de Kamp MW, Mayr R, Bostrom PJ, Boormans JL, Eckstein M, Mertens LS, Boevé ER, Neuzillet Y, Burger M, Pouessel D, Trombetta C, Wullich B, van der Kwast TH, Hartmann A, Allory Y, Lotan Y, Shariat SF, Zuiverloon TCM, Mir MC, van Rhijn BWG. Risk factors associated with positive surgical margins' location at radical cystectomy and their impact on bladder cancer survival. World J Urol 2021; 39:4363-4371. [PMID: 34196758 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03776-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the risk factors associated with positive surgical margins' (PSMs) location and their impact on disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS We analyzed a large multi-institutional cohort of patients treated with upfront RC for non-metastatic (cT1-4aN0M0) BCa. Multivariable binomial logistic regression analyses were used to assess the risk of PSMs at RC for each location after adjusting for clinicopathological covariates. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DSS stratified by margins' status and location. Log-rank statistics and Cox' regression models were used to determine significance. RESULTS A total of 1058 patients were included and 108 (10.2%) patients had PSMs. PSMs were located at soft-tissue, ureter(s), and urethra in 57 (5.4%), 30 (2.8%) and 21 (2.0%) patients, respectively. At multivariable analysis, soft-tissue PSMs were independently associated with pathological stage T4 (pT4) (Odds ratio (OR) 6.20, p < 0.001) and lymph-node metastases (OR 1.86, p = 0.04). Concomitant carcinoma-in-situ (CIS) was an independent risk factor for ureteric PSMs (OR 6.31, p = 0.003). Finally, urethral PSMs were independently correlated with pT4-stage (OR 5.10, p = 0.01). The estimated 3-years DSS rates were 58.2%, 32.4%, 50.1%, and 40.3% for negative SMs, soft-tissue-, ureteric- and urethral PSMs, respectively (log-rank; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS PSMs' location represents distinct risk factors' patterns. Concomitant CIS was associated with ureteric PSMs. Urethral and soft-tissue PSM showed worse DSS rates. Our results suggest that clinical decision-making paradigms on adjuvant treatment and surveillance might be adapted based on PSM and their location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Urological Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Maaike W van de Kamp
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Mayr
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Peter J Bostrom
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Egbert R Boevé
- Department of Urology, St Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France.,Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Center (IUCT) Oncopole, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Urological Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yves Allory
- Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR144, Molecular Oncology Team, PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tahlita C M Zuiverloon
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. .,Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Claps F, Rai S, Mir MC, van Rhijn BWG, Mazzon G, Davis LE, Valadon CL, Silvestri T, Rizzo M, Ankem M, Liguori G, Celia A, Trombetta C, Pavan N. Prognostic value of preoperative albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR) in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:835.e9-835.e17. [PMID: 34049782 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prognostic role of albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR) for the prediction of oncological outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort of bladder cancer (BC) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter cohort of patients treated with upfront RC for localized (cT1-4aN0M0) BC. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the ability of AFR to predict non-organ confined (NOC) disease and lymph-node involvement (LNI) at time of RC. Multivariable Cox' regression models were performed to evaluate the prognostic effect of AFR on Time-to-Progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS A cut-off value to discriminate between low and high AFR was determined by calculating the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve was 0.73 with an optimal cut-off at 9.53. Data were available for 246 patients (91 with low AFR, 155 with high AFR). Low AFR was associated with characteristics of tumor aggressiveness and independently predicted NOC (OR 2.11, P = 0.02) and LNI (OR 1.58, P = 0.04) at final pathological report. On multivariable Cox' regression analyses, preoperative low AFR was independently associated with worse TTP (HR 2.21, P = 0.02), OS (HR 2.24, P = 0.03), and CSS (HR 2.70, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION Preoperative low AFR is a prognostic biomarker for worse TTP, OS, CSS, and is independently associated with adverse tumor pathological features in BC patients undergoing RC. Our results suggest that especially patients with low AFR may be considered for neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, Valencia, Spain; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Samarpit Rai
- Department of Urology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, Valencia, Spain
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Mazzon
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | | | | | - Tommaso Silvestri
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Michele Rizzo
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Murali Ankem
- Department of Urology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Giovanni Liguori
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Antonio Celia
- Department of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sylvester RJ, Rodríguez O, Hernández V, Turturica D, Bauerová L, Bruins HM, Bründl J, van der Kwast TH, Brisuda A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Hentschel AE, Kusuma VRM, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Volanis D, Cussenot O, Subiela Henríquez JD, de la Peña E, Pisano F, Pešl M, van der Heijden AG, Herdegen S, Zlotta AR, Hacek J, Calatrava A, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Ashabere D, Haitel A, Côté JF, El Sheikh S, Lunelli L, Algaba F, Alemany I, Soria F, Runneboom W, Breyer J, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Llorente C, Molinaro L, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Evert M, Kiemeney LALM, N'Dow J, Plass K, Čapoun O, Soukup V, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Cohen D, Palou J, Gontero P, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Mostafid AH, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M, Compérat EM, Babjuk M, van Rhijn BWG. European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2021; 79:480-488. [PMID: 33419683 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are used to provide recommendations for patient treatment after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). They do not, however, take into account the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading classification and are based on patients treated in the 1980s. OBJECTIVE To update EAU prognostic factor risk groups using the WHO 1973 and 2004/2016 grading classifications and identify patients with the lowest and highest probabilities of progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for primary NMIBC patients were collected from the institutions of the members of the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel. INTERVENTION Patients underwent TURBT followed by intravesical instillations at the physician's discretion. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were fitted to the primary endpoint, the time to progression to muscle-invasive disease or distant metastases. Patients were divided into four risk groups: low-, intermediate-, high-, and a new, very high-risk group. The probabilities of progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 3401 patients treated with TURBT ± intravesical chemotherapy were included. From the multivariable analyses, tumor stage, WHO 1973/2004-2016 grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ, number of tumors, tumor size, and age were used to form four risk groups for which the probability of progression at 5 yr varied from <1% to >40%. Limitations include the retrospective collection of data and the lack of central pathology review. CONCLUSIONS This study provides updated EAU prognostic factor risk groups that can be used to inform patient treatment and follow-up. Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and 1973 grading classifications, a new, very high-risk group has been identified for which urologists should be prompt to assess and adapt their therapeutic strategy when necessary. PATIENT SUMMARY The newly updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide an improved basis for recommending a patient's treatment and follow-up schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Amir Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stokkel LE, Stokkel MPM, Donswijk ML, Lahaye MJ, Bekers EM, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. The Diagnostic Value of FDG-PET/CT for Urachal Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:373-380. [PMID: 33858788 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare malignancy that often presents at an advanced stage with metastases in up to a quarter of patients. There is no consensus on the optimal form of staging for patients with UrC. In the present study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emitted tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for UrC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 40 consecutive patients who were staged for urachal cancer between 2010 and 2020. They underwent a total of 62 FDG-PET/CTs (40 for primary staging, and 22 during follow-up), which were compared with standard-of-care contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). The metabolic detection of primary tumors, lymph node metastases (LNMs), peritoneal metastases (PMs), distant metastases (DMs), and local recurrence by FDG-PET/CT was evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated compared with CECT. Histopathology or follow-up imaging was the reference standard. RESULTS Of all 40 patients, 33 patients (83%) had urachal adenocarcinoma-26 (65%) with a mucinous component and 7 (17%) with invasive urothelial carcinoma. All local UrC tumors could be visualized on CT, and 80% showed increased FDG uptake. At initial staging, FDG-PET/CT detected FDG-avid LNMs, PMs, and DMs in 50%, 17%, and 25% of patients, respectively. These metastases were also visualized on CECT. During follow up, FDG-PET/CT revealed FDG-avid local recurrences that were not seen on CT in two out of eight patients (25%). CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates that most UrC can be visualized on FDG-PET/CT. At initial diagnosis, FDG-PET/CT does not seem to yield additional information compared with CECT; however, FDG-PET/CT may be helpful during follow-up. This is a small study, and the findings should be corroborated with larger series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Stokkel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise M Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Grotenhuis AJ, Cha EK, Malats N, Di Stasi S, Joniau S, Cai T, van Rhijn BWG, Irani J, Karnes J, Varkarakis J, Baniel J, Palou J, Babjuk M, Spahn M, Ardelt P, Colombo R, Serretta V, Dalbagni G, Gontero P, Bartoletti R, Larré S, Malmstrom PU, Sylvester R, Shariat SF. Association of patients' sex with treatment outcomes after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy for T1G3/HG bladder cancer. World J Urol 2021; 39:3337-3344. [PMID: 33713162 PMCID: PMC8510956 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03653-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the association of patients’ sex with recurrence and disease progression in patients treated with intravesical bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) for T1G3/HG urinary bladder cancer (UBC). Materials and methods We analyzed the data of 2635 patients treated with adjuvant intravesical BCG for T1 UBC between 1984 and 2019. We accounted for missing data using multiple imputations and adjusted for covariate imbalance between males and females using inverse probability weighting (IPW). Crude and IPW-adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of patients’ sex with HG-recurrence and disease progression. Results A total of 2170 (82%) males and 465 (18%) females were available for analysis. Overall, 1090 (50%) males and 244 (52%) females experienced recurrence, and 391 (18%) males and 104 (22%) females experienced disease progression. On IPW-adjusted Cox regression analyses, female sex was associated with disease progression (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.01–1.56, p = 0.04) but not with recurrence (HR 1.06, 95%CI 0.92–1.22, p = 0.41). A total of 1056 patients were treated with adequate BCG. In these patients, on IPW-adjusted Cox regression analyses, patients’ sex was not associated with recurrence (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.80–1.24, p = 0.96), HG-recurrence (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.78–1.29, p = 0.99) or disease progression (HR 1.12, 95%CI 0.78–1.60, p = 0.55). Conclusion Our analysis generates the hypothesis of a differential response to BCG between males and females if not adequately treated. Further studies should focus on sex-based differences in innate and adaptive immune system and their association with BCG response. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03653-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, University of the Studies of Turin, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, Turin, Italy
| | - Anne J Grotenhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eugene K Cha
- Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell, University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nuria Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Savino Di Stasi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Tor Vergata-University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Steven Joniau
- Oncologic and Reconstructive Urology, Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tommaso Cai
- Department of Urology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaques Irani
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Milétrie, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | - John Varkarakis
- Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jack Baniel
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Motol Hospital, University of Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Spahn
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuertzburg, Germany
| | - Peter Ardelt
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Departement of Urology, Università Vita Salute, Ospedale S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Serretta
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, University of the Studies of Turin, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Per-Uno Malmstrom
- Department of Urology, Academic Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Richard Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell, University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Voskuilen CS, van Gennep EJ, Einerhand SMH, Vegt E, Donswijk ML, Bruining A, van der Poel HG, Horenblas S, Hendricksen K, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. Staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Changes Treatment Recommendation in Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:366-369. [PMID: 33583752 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Given the high risk of systemic relapse following initial therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), improved pretreatment staging is needed. We evaluated the incremental value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) after standard conventional staging, in the largest cohort of MIBC patients to date. This is a retrospective analysis of 711 consecutive patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer who underwent staging contrast-enhanced CT (chest and abdomen) and FDG-PET/CT in a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. We recorded the clinical stage before and after FDG-PET/CT and treatment recommendation based on the stage before and after FDG-PET/CT. Clinical stage changed after FDG-PET/CT in 184/711 (26%) patients. Consequently, the recommended treatment strategy based on imaging changed in 127/711 (18%) patients. In 65/711 (9.1%) patients, potential curative treatment changed to palliative treatment because of the detection of distant metastases by FDG-PET/CT. Fifty (7.0%) patients were selected for neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy based on FDG-PET/CT. Moreover, FDG-PET/CT detected lesions suspicious for second primary tumors in 15%; a second primary malignancy was confirmed in 28/711 (3.9%), leading to treatment change in ten (1.4%) patients. Contrarily 57/711 (8.1%) had false positive secondary findings. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT provides important incremental staging information, which potentially influences clinical management in 18% of MIBC patients, but leads to false positive results as well. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scanning on treatment of bladder cancer patients. We found that FDG-PET/CT potentially influences the treatment of almost one-fifth of patients. We therefore suggest performing FDG-PET/CT as part of bladder cancer staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte S Voskuilen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J van Gennep
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah M H Einerhand
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
van Rhijn BWG, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Hernández V, Čapoun O, Bruins HM, Cohen D, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Burger M, Soukup V, Gontero P, Palou J, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ. Prognostic Value of the WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 Classification Systems for Grade in Primary Ta/T1 Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:182-191. [PMID: 33423944 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the current European Association of Urology (EAU) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) guideline, two classification systems for grade are advocated: WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016. OBJECTIVE To compare the prognostic value of these WHO systems. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5145 primary Ta/T1 NMIBC patients from 17 centers were collected between 1990 and 2019. The median follow-up was 3.9 yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariate and multivariable analyses of WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 stratified by center were performed for time to recurrence, progression (primary endpoint), cystectomy, and duration of survival, taking into account age, concomitant carcinoma in situ, gender, multiplicity, tumor size, initial treatment, and tumor stage. Harrell's concordance (C-index) was used for prognostic accuracy of classification systems. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median age was 68 yr; 3292 (64%) patients had Ta tumors. Neither classification system was prognostic for recurrence. For a four-tier combination of both WHO systems, progression at 5-yr follow-up was 1.4% in low-grade (LG)/G1, 3.8% in LG/G2, 7.7% in high grade (HG)/G2, and 18.8% in HG/G3 (log-rank, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses with WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 as independent variables, WHO1973 was a significant prognosticator of progression (p < 0.001), whereas WHO2004/2016 was not anymore (p = 0.067). C-indices for WHO1973, WHO2004, and the WHO systems combined for progression were 0.71, 0.67, and 0.73, respectively. Prognostic analyses for cystectomy and survival showed results similar to those for progression. CONCLUSIONS In this large prognostic factor study, both classification systems were prognostic for progression but not for recurrence. For progression, the prognostic value of WHO1973 was higher than that of WHO 2004/2016. The four-tier combination (LG/G1, LG/G2, HG/G2, and HG/G3) of both WHO systems proved to be superior, as it divides G2 patients into two subgroups (LG and HG) with different prognoses. Hence, the current EAU-NMIBC guideline recommendation to use both WHO classification systems remains correct. PATIENT SUMMARY At present, two classification systems are used in parallel to grade non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors. Our data on a large number of patients showed that the older classification system (WHO1973) performed better in terms of assessing progression than the more recent (WHO2004/2016) one. Nevertheless, we conclude that the current guideline recommendation for the use of both classification systems remains correct, since this has the advantage of dividing the large group of WHO1973 G2 patients into two subgroups (low and high grade) with different prognoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas W G van Rhijn
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Royal Free London - NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Richters A, Ripping TM, Kiemeney LA, Leliveld AM, van Rhijn BWG, Oddens JR, van Moorselaar RJA, Goossens-Laan CA, Meijer RP, Boormans JL, Witjes JA, Aben KKH. Hospital volume is associated with postoperative mortality after radical cystectomy for treatment of bladder cancer. BJU Int 2021; 128:511-518. [PMID: 33404154 PMCID: PMC8519083 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective To contribute to the debate regarding the minimum volume of radical cystectomies (RCs) that a hospital should perform by evaluating the association between hospital volume (HV) and postoperative mortality. Patients and Methods Patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018 were retrospectively identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. To create a calendar‐year independent measure, the HV of RCs was calculated per patient by counting the RCs performed in the same hospital in the 12 months preceding surgery. The relationship of HV with 30‐ and 90‐day mortality was assessed by logistic regression with a non‐linear spline function for HV as a continuous variable, which was adjusted for age, tumour, node and metastasis (TNM) stage, and neoadjuvant treatment. Results The median (interquartile range; range) HV among the 9287 RC‐treated patients was 19 (12–27; 1–75). Of all the included patients, 208 (2.2%) and 518 (5.6%) died within 30 and 90 days after RC, respectively. After adjustment for age, TNM stage and neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative mortality slightly increased between an HV of 0 and an HV of 25 RCs and steadily decreased from an HV of 30 onwards. The lowest risks of postoperative mortality were observed for the highest volumes. Conclusion This paper, based on high‐quality data from a large nationwide population‐based cohort, suggests that increasing the RC volume criteria beyond 30 RCs annually could further decrease postoperative mortality. Based on these results, the volume criterion of 20 RCs annually, as recently recommended by the European Association of Urology Guideline Panel, might therefore be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Richters
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Theodora M Ripping
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jorg R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Albers LF, Tillier CN, van Muilekom E, van Werkhoven E, Elzevier HW, van Rhijn BWG, van der Poel HG, Hendricksen K. Sexual Satisfaction in Men Suffering From Erectile Dysfunction After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: An Observational Study. J Sex Med 2020; 18:339-346. [PMID: 33358558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preservation of erectile function is an important postoperative quality of life concern for patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. Although erectile function may recover, many men continue to suffer from erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM This study aims to determine whether satisfaction with sexual life improves in patients with ED after RARP and which factors are associated with satisfaction during follow-up. METHODS A review was carried out of a prospectively maintained database of patients with prostate cancer who underwent a RARP between 2006 and 2019. The "International Index of Erectile Function" questionnaire was used to describe ED (range 5-25), overall satisfaction with sexual life and sexual desire (range for both: 2-10). Patients with ED due to RARP were compared with those without ED after RARP. Mixed effect model was used to test differences in satisfaction over time. Mann-Whitney U tests and multiple logistic regression were used to assess factors associated with being satisfied at 24 and 36 months. OUTCOMES The main outcomes of this study are the overall satisfaction with sexual life score over time and factors which influence sexual satisfaction. RESULTS Data of 2808 patients were reviewed. Patients whose erectile function was not known (n = 643) or who had ED at the baseline (n = 1281) were excluded. About 884 patients were included for analysis. They had an overall satisfaction score of 8.4. Patients with ED due to RARP had mean overall satisfaction scores of 4.8, 4.8, 4.9, and 4.6 at 6 mo, 12 mo, 24 mo, and 36 mo. These scores were significantly lower than those of patients without ED at every time point. In multiple regression analysis, higher overall satisfaction score at the baseline and higher sexual desire at 24 and 36 months' follow-up were associated with satisfaction with sexual life at 24 and 36 months' follow-up. No association was found for erectile function. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Interventions focusing on adjustment to the changes in sexual functioning might improve sexual satisfaction; especially for those men who continue to suffer from ED. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS Strengths of this study are the large number of patients, time of follow-up, and use of multiple validated questionnaires. Our results must be interpreted within the limits of retrospectively collected, observational data. CONCLUSION Satisfaction with sexual life in men with ED due to RARP may take a long time to improve. One could counsel patients that sexual satisfaction is based on individual baseline sexual satisfaction and the return of sexual desire after RARP. Albers LF, Tillier CN, van Muilekom HAM, et al. Sexual Satisfaction in Men Suffering From Erectile Dysfunction After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: An Observational Study. J Sex Med 2021;18:339-346.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonore F Albers
- Department of Urology and Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Corinne N Tillier
- Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik van Muilekom
- Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik van Werkhoven
- Biometrics Department, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk W Elzevier
- Department of Urology and Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|