1
|
Heeling E, van de Kamer JB, Methorst M, Bruining A, van de Meent M, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Lok CAR, van der Ploeg IMC. The Safe Use of 125I-Seeds as a Localization Technique in Breast Cancer during Pregnancy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3229. [PMID: 37370839 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Some aspects of the treatment protocol for breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) have not been thoroughly studied. This study provides clarity regarding the safety of the use of 125I-seeds as a localization technique for breast-conserving surgery in patients with PrBC. METHODS To calculate the exposure to the fetus of one 125I-seed implanted in a breast tumor, we developed a model accounting for the decaying 125I-source, time to surgery, and the declining distance between the 125I-seed and the fetus. The primary outcome was the maximum cumulative fetal dose of radiation at consecutive gestational ages (GA). RESULTS The cumulative fetal dose remains below 1 mSv if a single 125I-seed is implanted at a GA of 26 weeks. After a GA of 26 weeks, the fetal dose can be at a maximum of 11.6 mSv. If surgery takes place within two weeks of implantation from a GA of 26 weeks, and one week above a GA of 32 weeks, the dose remains below 1 mSv. CONCLUSION The use of 125I-seeds is safe in PrBC. The maximum fetal exposure remains well below the threshold of 100 mSv, and therefore, does not lead to an increased risk of fetal tissue damage. Still, we propose keeping the fetal dose as low as possible, preferably below 1 mSv.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Heeling
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen B van de Kamer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Methorst
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mette van de Meent
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris M C van der Ploeg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zijlker LP, Bakker M, van der Hiel B, Bruining A, Klop WMC, Zuur CL, Wouters MWJM, van Akkooi ACJ. Baseline ultrasound and FDG-PET/CT imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:841-847. [PMID: 36573839 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous tumor with a high tendency to metastasize, and a significant proportion of patients have metastases at first presentation. This study aims to determine the value of baseline ultrasound (US) and 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 FDG-PET/CT) imaging in both patients with clinically localized MCC (Stage I/II) and patients who present with palpable lymph nodes (Stage III). METHODS This retrospective cohort included 135 MCC patients who underwent baseline US (with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)) and/or FDG-PET/CT imaging between 2015 and 2021. RESULTS Of the 104 patients with clinically localized disease, 48% were upstaged to Stage III and 3% to Stage IV by imaging or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). FDG-PET/CT imaging identified regional metastases in 23%, while US with FNAC identified regional metastases in 19%. SLNB was performed in 56 patients, of whom 57% were upstaged to Stage III. Of the 31 patients who presented with palpable lymph nodes, 16% were upstaged to Stage IV by FDG-PET/CT imaging. CONCLUSION Baseline imaging frequently upstages Stage I/II MCC patients to Stage III, both by US and FDG-PET/CT, Stage IV disease is rarely identified. Patients who present with palpable nodes are frequently upstaged to Stage IV by FDG-PET/CT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne P Zijlker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Max Bakker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernies van der Hiel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Martin C Klop
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Zuur
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Melanoma Surgery, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Central Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zijlker L, Bakker M, van der Hiel B, Bruining A, Klop M, Zuur C, Wouters M, van Akkooi A. Baseline ultrasound and FDG-PET/CT imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
|
4
|
Versluis JM, Menzies AM, Sikorska K, Rozeman EA, Saw RPM, van Houdt WJ, Eriksson H, Klop WMC, Ch'ng S, van Thienen JV, Mallo H, Gonzalez M, Torres Acosta A, Grijpink-Ongering LG, van der Wal A, Bruining A, van de Wiel BA, Scolyer RA, Haanen JBAG, Schumacher TN, van Akkooi ACJ, Long GV, Blank CU. Survival update of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma in the OpACIN and OpACIN-neo trials. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:420-430. [PMID: 36681299 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab has yielded high response rates in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma. These response rates translated to high short-term survival rates. However, data on long-term survival and disease recurrence are lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS In OpACIN, 20 patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized to ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w four cycles of adjuvant or split two cycles of neoadjuvant and two adjuvant. In OpACIN-neo, 86 patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized to arm A (2× ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w; n = 30), arm B (2× ipilimumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg q3w; n = 30), or arm C (2× ipilimumab 3 mg/kg q3w plus 2× nivolumab 3 mg/kg q2w; n = 26) followed by surgery. RESULTS The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in either trial. After a median follow-up of 69 months for OpACIN, 1/7 patients with a pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy had disease recurrence. The estimated 5-year RFS and OS rates for the neoadjuvant arm were 70% and 90% versus 60% and 70% for the adjuvant arm. After a median follow-up of 47 months for OpACIN-neo, the estimated 3-year RFS and OS rates were 82% and 92%, respectively. The estimated 3-year RFS rate for OpACIN-neo was 95% for patients with a pathologic response versus 37% for patients without a pathologic response (P < 0.001). In multiple regression analyses, pathologic response was the strongest predictor of disease recurrence. Of the 12 patients with distant disease recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy, 5 responded to subsequent anti-PD-1 and 8 to targeted therapy, although 7 patients showed progression after the initial response. CONCLUSIONS Updated data confirm the high survival rates after neoadjuvant combination checkpoint inhibition in macroscopic stage III melanoma, especially for patients with a pathologic response. Pathologic response is the strongest surrogate marker for long-term outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Versluis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E A Rozeman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, Sydney; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - W J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Eriksson
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Department of Oncology/Skin Cancer Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - W M C Klop
- Departments of, Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, Sydney; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J V van Thienen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Mallo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Gonzalez
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney
| | - A Torres Acosta
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - A van der Wal
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bruining
- Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B A van de Wiel
- Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - J B A G Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - T N Schumacher
- Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - G V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - C U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reijers SJM, Gennaro N, Bruining A, van Boven H, Snaebjornsson P, Bekers EM, van Coevorden F, Scholten AN, Schrage Y, van der Graaf WTA, Haas RLM, van Houdt WJ. Correlation of radiological and histopathological response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:25-32. [PMID: 36637511 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2166427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the association between radiological and histopathological response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS), as well as the prognostic value of the different response evaluation methods on the oncological outcome. METHODS A retrospective cohort of patients with localized STS of the extremity and trunk wall, treated with nRT followed by resection were included. The radiological response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 (RECIST) and MR-adapted Choi (Choi), histopathologic response was evaluated according to the EORTC-STBSG recommendations. Oncological outcome parameters of interest were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS For 107 patients, complete pre- and postoperative pathology and imaging datasets were available. Most tumors were high-grade (77%) and the most common histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma/not otherwise specified (UPS/NOS, 40%), myxoid liposarcoma (MLS, 21%) and myxofibrosarcoma (MFS, 16%). When comparing RECIST to Choi, the response was differently categorized in 58%, with a higher response rate (CR + PR) with Choi. Radiological responders showed a significant lower median percentage of viable cells (RECIST p = .050, Choi p = .015) and necrosis (RECIST p < .001), and a higher median percentage of fibrosis (RECIST p = .005, Choi p = .008), compared to radiological non-responders (SD + PD). RECIST, Choi, fibrosis, and viable cells were not significantly associated with altered oncological outcome, more necrosis was associated with poorer OS (p = .038). CONCLUSION RECIST, Choi and the EORTC-STBSG response score show incongruent results in response evaluation. The radiological response was significantly correlated with a lower percentage of viable cells and necrosis, but a higher percentage of fibrosis. Apart from necrosis, radiological nor other histopathological parameters were associated with oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie J M Reijers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolò Gennaro
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester van Boven
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise M Bekers
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frits van Coevorden
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid N Scholten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Schrage
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rick L M Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Einerhand SM, Voskuilen CS, van de Putte EEF, Donswijk ML, Bruining A, van der Heijden MS, Mertens LS, Hendricksen K, Vegt E, van Rhijn BW. Prospective Evaluation of FDG-PET/CT for On-treatment Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant or Induction Chemotherapy in Invasive Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2022. [DOI: 10.3233/blc-220036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy (NAIC) improves survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). On-treatment response assessment may aid in decisions to continue or cease NAIC. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) could predict response to NAIC and compared to contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT). METHODS: We prospectively included 83 patients treated for MIBC (i.e. high-risk cT2-4N0M0 or cT1-4N+M0-1a) between 2014 and 2018. Response to NAIC was assessed after 2-3 cycles with FDG-PET/CT (Peter-Mac and EORTC criteria) and CECT (RECIST1.1 criteria). We assessed prediction of complete pathological response (pCR; ypT0N0), complete pathological down-staging (pCD;≤ypT1N0), any down-staging from baseline (ypTN < cTN) and progression (inoperable tumor/ypN+/M+). The reference standard was histopathological assessment or clinical follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: Pathological response rates were 21% for pCR, 29% for pCD, and 10% progressed. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and 61 patients also underwent CECT (73%). Accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for prediction of pCR, pCD, and progression were 73%, 48%, and 73%, respectively. Accuracy of CECT for prediction of pCR, pCD, and progression were 78%, 65%, and 67%, respectively. Specificity of CECT was significantly higher than FDG-PET/CT for prediction of pCD and any down-staging (p = 0.007 and p = 0.022). In all other analyses, no significant differences between FDG-PET/CT and CECT were found. CONCLUSIONS: Routine FDG-PET/CT has insufficient predictive power to aid in response assessment compared to CECT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M.H. Einerhand
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, TheNetherlands
| | - Charlotte S. Voskuilen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, TheNetherlands
| | | | - Maarten L. Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel S. van der Heijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, TheNetherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, TheNetherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W.G. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, TheNetherlands
- Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zawaideh JP, Freeman S, Smith J, Bruining A, Sadler T, Carmisciano L, Addley HC. Placental MRI: identification of radiological features to predict placental attachment disease regardless of reader expertise. Eur J Radiol 2022; 149:110203. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
8
|
Sharma AK, de la Torre J, IJzerman NS, Sutton TL, Zhao B, Khan TM, Banerjee S, Cui C, Nguyen V, Alkhuziem M, Snaebjornsson P, van Boven H, Bruining A, Tang CM, Yoon H, De la Fuente A, Kato S, Patel H, Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Horgan S, Burgoyne AM, Fanta P, Mesirov JP, Blakely AM, Davis JL, Mayo SC, van Houdt WJ, Steeghs N, Sicklick JK. Location of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in the Stomach Predicts Tumor Mutation Profile and Drug Sensitivity. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5334-5342. [PMID: 34326133 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) commonly arise in different regions of the stomach and are driven by various mutations (most often in KIT, PDGFRA, and SDHx). We hypothesized that the anatomic location of gastric GIST is associated with unique genomic profiles and distinct driver mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We compared KIT versus non-KIT status with tumor location within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for 2,418 patients with primary gastric GIST. Additionally, we compiled an international cohort (TransAtlantic GIST Collaborative, TAGC) of 236 patients and reviewed sequencing results, cross-sectional imaging, and operative reports. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumors located proximally versus distally. Risk factors for KIT versus non-KIT tumors were identified using multivariate regression analysis. A random forest machine learning model was then developed to determine feature importance. RESULTS Within the NCDB cohort, non-KIT mutants dominated distal tumor locations (P < 0.03). Proximal GIST were almost exclusively KIT mutant (96%) in the TAGC cohort, whereas 100% of PDGFRA and SDH-mutant GIST occurred in the distal stomach. On multivariate regression analysis, tumor location was associated with KIT versus non-KIT mutations. Using random forest machine learning analysis, stomach location was the most important feature for predicting mutation status. CONCLUSIONS We provide the first evidence that the mutational landscape of gastric GIST is related to tumor location. Proximal gastric GIST are overwhelmingly KIT mutant, irrespective of morphology or age, whereas distal tumors display non-KIT genomic diversity. Anatomic location of gastric GIST may therefore provide immediate guidance for clinical treatment decisions and selective confirmatory genomic testing when resources are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwyn K Sharma
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jorge de la Torre
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Nikki S IJzerman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas L Sutton
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Beiqun Zhao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Tahsin M Khan
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sudeep Banerjee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christina Cui
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Vi Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Maha Alkhuziem
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hester van Boven
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chih-Min Tang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Hyunho Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Alexa De la Fuente
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Shumei Kato
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Hitendra Patel
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Michael C Heinrich
- Department of Medical Oncology, Portland VA Health Care System and Oregon Health and Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Christopher L Corless
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Adam M Burgoyne
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Paul Fanta
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Jill P Mesirov
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.,Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jason K Sicklick
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. .,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sahin H, Smith J, Zawaideh JP, Shakur A, Carmisciano L, Caglic I, Bruining A, Jimenez-Linan M, Freeman S, Addley H. Diagnostic interpretation of non-contrast qualitative MR imaging features for characterisation of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210115. [PMID: 34111973 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the value of non-contrast MRI features for characterisation of uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and differentiation from atypical benign leiomyomas. METHODS This study included 57 atypical leiomyomas and 16 LMS which were referred pre-operatively for management review to the specialist gynaeoncology multidisciplinary team meeting. Non-contrast MRIs were retrospectively reviewed by five independent readers (three senior, two junior) and a 5-level Likert score (1-low/5-high) was assigned to each mass for likelihood of LMS. Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative MRI features was done using uni- and multivariable regression analysis. Inter-reader reliability for the assessment of MRI features was calculated by using Cohen's κ values. RESULTS In the univariate analysis, interruption of the endometrial interface and irregular tumour shape had the highest odds ratios (ORs) (64.00, p < 0.001 and 12.00, p = 0.002, respectively) for prediction of LMS. Likert score of the mass was significant in prediction (OR, 3.14; p < 0.001) with excellent reliability between readers (ICC 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.92). The post-menopausal status, interruption of endometrial interface and thickened endometrial stripe were the most predictive independent variables in multivariable estimation of the risk of leiomyosarcoma with an accuracy of 0.88 (95%CI, 0.78-0.94). CONCLUSION At any level of expertise as a radiologist reader, the loss of the normal endometrial stripe (either thickened or not seen) in a post-menopausal patient with a myometrial mass was highly likely to be LMS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This study demonstrates the potential utility of non-contrast MRI features in characterisation of LMS over atypical leiomyomas, and therefore influence on optimal management of these cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilal Sahin
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Janette Smith
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeries Paolo Zawaideh
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amreen Shakur
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luca Carmisciano
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Biostatistics section, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Iztok Caglic
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mercedes Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sue Freeman
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helen Addley
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Einerhand S, Voskuilen C, Fransen Van De Putte E, Donswijk M, Bruining A, Van Der Heijden M, Mertens L, Hendricksen K, Vegt E, Van Rhijn B. Prospective study on fdg-pet/ct for on-treatment assessment of response to neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)01204-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
11
|
Stahlie EHA, van der Hiel B, Bruining A, van de Wiel B, Schrage YM, Wouters MWJM, van Houdt WJ, van Akkooi ACJ. The value of lymph node ultrasound and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT in stage IIB/C melanoma patients prior to SLNB. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1157-1162. [PMID: 33353826 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stage IIB/IIC (8th AJCC) melanoma patients are known to have high-risk primary tumors, however they follow the same routine to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as more low risk tumors. Guidelines are not conclusive regarding the use of preoperative imaging for these patients. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the value of ultrasound (US) and 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) and SLNB for stage IIB/C melanoma patients. METHODS From 2019-04 till 2020-01, all stage IIB/C melanoma patients underwent US of the regional lymph nodes and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT before their planned LSG and SLNB. Suspected metastases were confirmed with fine needle aspiration (FNA), prior to surgery. RESULTS In total 23 patients were screened: six had metastases detected by imaging, two by US, one by 18F-FDG PET/CT and three were detected by both imaging modalities. All metastases were nodal and therefore treatment was altered to lymph node dissection and all but one also received adjuvant therapy. Eight (47%) of the 17 patients without macroscopic disease, still had a positive SN. Sensitivity, specificity and false negative rate for US and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 36%, 89%, 64% and 29%, 100% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION Preoperative negative imaging does not exclude the presence of SN metastases, therefore SLNB cannot be foregone. However, US detected metastases in 22% of patients, altering their treatment, which suggests it is effective in the work-up of stage IIB/C melanoma. Staging with 18F-FDG PET/CT is not of added value prior to LSG and SLNB and should therefore not be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E H A Stahlie
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B van der Hiel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B van de Wiel
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Y M Schrage
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W J M Wouters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gennaro N, Reijers S, Bruining A, Messiou C, Haas R, Colombo P, Bodalal Z, Beets-Tan R, van Houdt W, van der Graaf WTA. Imaging response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcomas: Where do we stand? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 160:103309. [PMID: 33757836 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a broad family of rare tumours for which surgery with radiotherapy represents first-line treatment. Recently, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy has been increasingly used in high-risk patients in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. An adequate understanding of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies would optimise patient care, allowing a tailored approach. Although response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is the most common imaging method to assess tumour response, Choi criteria and functional and molecular imaging (DWI, DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET) seem to outperform it in the discrimination between responders and non-responders. Moreover, the radiologic-pathology correlation of treatment-related changes remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the imaging assessment of tumour response in STS undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, including conventional imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and advanced imaging analysis. Future directions will be presented to shed light on potential advances in pre-surgical imaging assessments that have clinical implications for sarcoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Gennaro
- Humanitas Research and Cancer Center, Dept. of Radiology, Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas University, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sophie Reijers
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christina Messiou
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Dept. Of Radiology Sarcoma Unit, Sutton, United Kingdom; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Rick Haas
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | | | - Zuhir Bodalal
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Regina Beets-Tan
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Radiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle University Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Winan van Houdt
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Winette T A van der Graaf
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Dept. of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dept. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Voskuilen CS, van Gennep EJ, Einerhand SMH, Vegt E, Donswijk ML, Bruining A, van der Poel HG, Horenblas S, Hendricksen K, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. Staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Changes Treatment Recommendation in Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:366-369. [PMID: 33583752 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Given the high risk of systemic relapse following initial therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), improved pretreatment staging is needed. We evaluated the incremental value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) after standard conventional staging, in the largest cohort of MIBC patients to date. This is a retrospective analysis of 711 consecutive patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer who underwent staging contrast-enhanced CT (chest and abdomen) and FDG-PET/CT in a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. We recorded the clinical stage before and after FDG-PET/CT and treatment recommendation based on the stage before and after FDG-PET/CT. Clinical stage changed after FDG-PET/CT in 184/711 (26%) patients. Consequently, the recommended treatment strategy based on imaging changed in 127/711 (18%) patients. In 65/711 (9.1%) patients, potential curative treatment changed to palliative treatment because of the detection of distant metastases by FDG-PET/CT. Fifty (7.0%) patients were selected for neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy based on FDG-PET/CT. Moreover, FDG-PET/CT detected lesions suspicious for second primary tumors in 15%; a second primary malignancy was confirmed in 28/711 (3.9%), leading to treatment change in ten (1.4%) patients. Contrarily 57/711 (8.1%) had false positive secondary findings. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT provides important incremental staging information, which potentially influences clinical management in 18% of MIBC patients, but leads to false positive results as well. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we investigated the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scanning on treatment of bladder cancer patients. We found that FDG-PET/CT potentially influences the treatment of almost one-fifth of patients. We therefore suggest performing FDG-PET/CT as part of bladder cancer staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte S Voskuilen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J van Gennep
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah M H Einerhand
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ursprung S, Beer L, Bruining A, Woitek R, Stewart GD, Gallagher FA, Sala E. Radiomics of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in renal cell carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:3558-3566. [PMID: 32060715 PMCID: PMC7248043 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06666-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To assess the methodological quality of radiomics studies investigating histological subtypes, therapy response, and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and (2) to determine the risk of bias in these radiomics studies. METHODS In this systematic review, literature published since 2000 on radiomics in RCC was included and assessed for methodological quality using the Radiomics Quality Score. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool and a meta-analysis of radiomics studies focusing on differentiating between angiomyolipoma without visible fat and RCC was performed. RESULTS Fifty-seven studies investigating the use of radiomics in renal cancer were identified, including 4590 patients in total. The average Radiomics Quality Score was 3.41 (9.4% of total) with good inter-rater agreement (ICC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.98). Three studies validated results with an independent dataset, one used a publically available validation dataset. None of the studies shared the code, images, or regions of interest. The meta-analysis showed moderate heterogeneity among the included studies and an odds ratio of 6.24 (95% CI 4.27-9.12; p < 0.001) for the differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from RCC. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics algorithms show promise for answering clinical questions where subjective interpretation is challenging or not established. However, the generalizability of findings to prospective cohorts needs to be demonstrated in future trials for progression towards clinical translation. Improved sharing of methods including code and images could facilitate independent validation of radiomics signatures. KEY POINTS • Studies achieved an average Radiomics Quality Score of 10.8%. Common reasons for low Radiomics Quality Scores were unvalidated results, retrospective study design, absence of open science, and insufficient control for multiple comparisons. • A previous training phase allowed reaching almost perfect inter-rater agreement in the application of the Radiomics Quality Score. • Meta-analysis of radiomics studies distinguishing angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma show moderate diagnostic odds ratios of 6.24 and moderate methodological diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Ursprung
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lucian Beer
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Grant D Stewart
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stahlie EH, Van Der Hiel B, Bruining A, Wouters MW, Schrage Y, van Houdt WJ, Van Akkooi ACJ. The value of lymph node ultrasound and whole body PET/CT in stage IIB/C patients prior to SLNB. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e22079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e22079 Background: Stage IIB/IIC (pT3b-T4N0) patients are known to have high-risk primary tumors, even higher risk than some stage IIIA/B melanomas (AJCC Staging System 8th edition), however they follow the same routine to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as more low-risk tumors. A priori the risk of finding SLNB or other metastases is much higher for these thick and/or ulcerated primary melanomas compared to the thinner ones. Guidelines are not conclusive regarding the use of preoperative imaging in these cases. Recently, a trend to more frequently use cross-sectional imaging has been noticed. However, others have previously shown that preoperative ultrasound was the most sensitive. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the value of ultrasound (US) and Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography (PET/CT) prior to SLNB for stage IIB/C (pT3b-T4N0) melanoma patients. Methods: Starting 2019-04, all patients with a pT3b melanoma or higher (8th AJCC) were included. All patients underwent US and PET/CT before their planned lymphoscintigraphy and routine SLNB. Suspected metastases were confirmed with cytologic puncture. Results: A total of 20 patients were screened. Seven patients (35%) had metastases detected by imaging: one by PET/CT, three by US and three by both imaging modalities. Three of these metastases were detected by US as well as PET/CT. All metastases were nodal. For all seven patients treatment was altered to lymph node dissection with adjuvant therapy. Of the 13 patients in whom no metastases were identified by imaging, six (46%) still had a positive sentinel node (SN). Conclusions: This study showed that this select group of patients had a high risk of metastases prior to SLNB and that all recurrences except one, were detected by ultrasound. This suggests that nodal staging with US is sufficient and can replace the need for SLNB when metastases is proven with cytology. Despite negative imaging, SLNB cannot be foregone for pT3b-pT4N0 melanoma patients, as many still have an involved SN. Cross-sectional imaging can be reserved for patients after positive cytology or SN to confirm the absence of distant visceral metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bernies Van Der Hiel
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michel W.J.M. Wouters
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Schrage
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Blank C, Versluis J, Reijers I, Sikorska K, van Houdt W, van Thienen J, Adriaansz S, Mallo H, van Tinteren H, van de Wiel B, Grijpink-Ongering L, Bruining A, Haanen JBAG, van Akkooi A, Schumacher T, Rozeman E. 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and long-term toxicity of (neo)adjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) + nivolumab (NIVO) in macroscopic stage III melanoma (OpACIN trial). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz255.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
17
|
Bruining A, Heijmink SWTPJ. [Radiological assessment of lymph nodes in the inguinal region]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2019; 163:D4105. [PMID: 31361417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
In this commentary, the radiological aspects of ultrasonography of lymph nodes in the inguinal region and the various differential diagnoses are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemarie Bruining
- Nederlands Kanker Instituut-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, afd. Radiologie, Amsterdam
| | - Stijn W T P J Heijmink
- Nederlands Kanker Instituut-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, afd. Radiologie, Amsterdam
- Contact: S.W.T.P.J. Heijmink
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schütz K, Alecsandru D, Grimbacher B, Haddock J, Bruining A, Driessen G, de Vries E, van Hagen PM, Hartmann I, Fraioli F, Milito C, Mitrevski M, Quinti I, Serra G, Kelleher P, Loebinger M, Litzman J, Postranecka V, Thon V, Babar J, Condliffe AM, Exley A, Kumararatne D, Screaton N, Jones A, Bondioni MP, Lougaris V, Plebani A, Soresina A, Sirignano C, Spadaro G, Galal N, Gonzalez-Granado LI, Dettmer S, Stirling R, Chapel H, Lucas M, Patel S, Farber CM, Meyts I, Banerjee AK, Hackett S, Hurst JR, Warnatz K, Gathmann B, Weidemann J, Berthold D, Baumann U. Correction to: Imaging of Bronchial Pathology in Antibody Deficiency: Data from the European Chest CT Group. J Clin Immunol 2019; 39:225-227. [PMID: 30905051 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-019-00609-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In the original version of this article unfortunately two authors were missing: Dr. Jürgen Weidemann and Dr. Daniel Berthold. The correct list of authors is presented above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schütz
- Paediatric Immunology Unit, Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Diana Alecsandru
- Primary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Pediatrics, Hospital 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bodo Grimbacher
- Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Centre for Chronic Immunodeficiency, University Medical Center of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Annemarie Bruining
- Dutch Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Gertjan Driessen
- Paediatric Immunology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Paediatrics, Juliana Children's Hospital/Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Esther de Vries
- Jeroen Bosch Academy, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.,Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M van Hagen
- Immunology and Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ieneke Hartmann
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Radiology, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cinzia Milito
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Milica Mitrevski
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Quinti
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Goffredo Serra
- Radiology, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter Kelleher
- Immunology Section Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Loebinger
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jiri Litzman
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vera Postranecka
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vojtech Thon
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.,RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Judith Babar
- Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Alison Jones
- Paediatric Immunology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Vassilios Lougaris
- Pediatrics Clinic and Institute for Molecular Medicine A. Nocivelli, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Plebani
- Pediatrics Clinic and Institute for Molecular Medicine A. Nocivelli, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Cesare Sirignano
- Radiology, IBB-CNR University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sabine Dettmer
- Diagnostic Radiology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Robert Stirling
- Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Chapel
- Primary Immunodeficiency Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mary Lucas
- Primary Immunodeficiency Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Smita Patel
- Primary Immunodeficiency Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Isabelle Meyts
- Paediatric Immunology and Pulmonology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Scott Hackett
- Paediatric Immunology Department, Heartlands Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John R Hurst
- UCL Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Klaus Warnatz
- Centre for Chronic Immunodeficiency, University Medical Center of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Gathmann
- ESID Registry Working Party, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weidemann
- Paediatric Radiology and Sonographics, Children's Hospital auf der Bult, Hanover, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Baumann
- Paediatric Immunology Unit, Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schermers B, Franke V, Rozeman EA, van de Wiel BA, Bruining A, Wouters MW, van Houdt WJ, Ten Haken B, Muller SH, Bierman C, Ruers TJM, Blank CU, van Akkooi ACJ. Surgical removal of the index node marked using magnetic seed localization to assess response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma. Br J Surg 2019; 106:519-522. [PMID: 30882901 PMCID: PMC6593699 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This pilot study explored the value of localized index node removal after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma, for use as a response indicator to guide the extent of completion lymph node dissection. Promising technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Schermers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,MIRA Institute, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - V Franke
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E A Rozeman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B A van de Wiel
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W Wouters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Ten Haken
- MIRA Institute, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - S H Muller
- Department of Clinical Physics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Bierman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T J M Ruers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,MIRA Institute, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - C U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schütz K, Alecsandru D, Grimbacher B, Haddock J, Bruining A, Driessen G, de Vries E, van Hagen PM, Hartmann I, Fraioli F, Milito C, Mitrevski M, Quinti I, Serra G, Kelleher P, Loebinger M, Litzman J, Postranecka V, Thon V, Babar J, Condliffe AM, Exley A, Kumararatne D, Screaton N, Jones A, Bondioni MP, Lougaris V, Plebani A, Soresina A, Sirignano C, Spadaro G, Galal N, Gonzalez-Granado LI, Dettmer S, Stirling R, Chapel H, Lucas M, Patel S, Farber CM, Meyts I, Banerjee AK, Hackett S, Hurst JR, Warnatz K, Gathmann B, Baumann U. Imaging of Bronchial Pathology in Antibody Deficiency: Data from the European Chest CT Group. J Clin Immunol 2018; 39:45-54. [PMID: 30547383 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-018-0577-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Studies of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary antibody deficiency syndromes (ADS) suggest a broad range of bronchial pathology. However, there are as yet no multicentre studies to assess the variety of bronchial pathology in this patient group. One of the underlying reasons is the lack of a consensus methodology, a prerequisite to jointly document chest CT findings. We aimed to establish an international platform for the evaluation of bronchial pathology as assessed by chest CT and to describe the range of bronchial pathologies in patients with antibody deficiency. Ffteen immunodeficiency centres from 9 countries evaluated chest CT scans of patients with ADS using a predefined list of potential findings including an extent score for bronchiectasis. Data of 282 patients with ADS were collected. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) comprised the largest subgroup (232 patients, 82.3%). Eighty percent of CVID patients had radiological evidence of bronchial pathology including bronchiectasis in 61%, bronchial wall thickening in 44% and mucus plugging in 29%. Bronchiectasis was detected in 44% of CVID patients aged less than 20 years. Cough was a better predictor for bronchiectasis than spirometry values. Delay of diagnosis as well as duration of disease correlated positively with presence of bronchiectasis. The use of consensus diagnostic criteria and a pre-defined list of bronchial pathologies allows for comparison of chest CT data in multicentre studies. Our data suggest a high prevalence of bronchial pathology in CVID due to late diagnosis or duration of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schütz
- Paediatric Immunology Unit, Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Diana Alecsandru
- Primary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Pediatrics, Hospital 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bodo Grimbacher
- Clinical Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for Chronic Immunodeficiency, University Medical Center of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Annemarie Bruining
- Dutch Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Gertjan Driessen
- Paediatric Immunology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Paediatrics, Juliana Children's Hospital/Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Esther de Vries
- Jeroen Bosch Academy, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M van Hagen
- Immunology and Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ieneke Hartmann
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Radiology, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cinzia Milito
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Milica Mitrevski
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Quinti
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Goffredo Serra
- Radiology, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter Kelleher
- Immunology Section Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Loebinger
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jiri Litzman
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vera Postranecka
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vojtech Thon
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
- RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Judith Babar
- Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Alison Jones
- Paediatric Immunology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Vassilios Lougaris
- Pediatrics Clinic and Institute for Molecular Medicine A. Nocivelli, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Plebani
- Pediatrics Clinic and Institute for Molecular Medicine A. Nocivelli, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Cesare Sirignano
- Radiology, IBB-CNR University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sabine Dettmer
- Diagnostic Radiology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Robert Stirling
- Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Chapel
- Primary Immunodeficiency Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mary Lucas
- Primary Immunodeficiency Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Smita Patel
- Primary Immunodeficiency Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Isabelle Meyts
- Paediatric Immunology and Pulmonology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Scott Hackett
- Paediatric Immunology Department, Heartlands Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John R Hurst
- UCL Respiratory Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Klaus Warnatz
- Centre for Chronic Immunodeficiency, University Medical Center of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Gathmann
- ESID Registry Working Party, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Baumann
- Paediatric Immunology Unit, Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rozeman E, Sikorska K, van de Wiel B, Fanchi L, Krijgsman O, van Thienen H, Pronk L, Broeks A, Grijpink-Ongering L, Ter Meulen S, Bruining A, Klop W, van Tinteren H, Peeper D, Haanen J, van Akkooi A, Schumacher T, Blank C. 30 months relapse-free survival, overall survival, and long-term toxicity update of (neo)adjuvant ipilimumab (ipi) + nivolumab (nivo) in macroscopic stage III melanoma (OPACIN trial). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy511.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
22
|
Verver D, Oude Ophuis CMC, Koppert LB, de Monyé C, van Deurzen CHM, Koljenović S, Bruining A, van der Hiel B, Ter Meulen S, van Akkooi ACJ, Verhoef C, Grünhagen DJ. Gamma probe and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of the sentinel node (GULF) trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:1926-1933. [PMID: 29700573 PMCID: PMC6132503 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4014-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was introduced as a minimally invasive technique for nodal staging. Since associated morbidity is not negligible, it is highly relevant to pursue a more minimally invasive alternative. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the sensitivity of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with combined gamma probe and ultrasound (US) guidance in comparison with the gold standard histology of the sentinel node (SN) after SLNB for detecting metastasis. METHODS The study was designed as a prospective, multicentre, open-label, single-arm trial enrolling patients with newly diagnosed cutaneous melanoma or breast cancer between May 2015 and August 2017. Sample radioactivity was measured using a Mini 900 scintillation monitor. After FNAC, all patients underwent SLNB. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated. RESULTS Accrual was terminated early following an unplanned interim analysis indicating that a FNAC sensitivity of at least 80% could not be achieved. In total 58 patients of the originally planned 116 patients underwent FNAC with gamma probe and US guidance. There were no true-positive FNAC results, 14 false-negative results and one false-positive result, and thus the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of FNAC were 0%, 98%, 0% and 75%, respectively. At least 75% of the FNAC samples had a radioactivity signal higher than the background signal. CONCLUSION FNAC with gamma probe and US guidance is not able to correctly detect metastases in the SN and is therefore not able to replace SLNB. Gamma probe-guided US is a highly accurate method for correctly identifying the SN, which offers possibilities for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniëlle Verver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlotte M C Oude Ophuis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile de Monyé
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carolien H M van Deurzen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Senada Koljenović
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernies van der Hiel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvia Ter Meulen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Groene Hilledijk 301, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|