1
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Contieri R, Mertens LS, Claps F, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LALM, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. Second TURB, restaging TURB or repeat TURB in primary T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: impact on prognosis? Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1323-1333. [PMID: 37980689 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03867-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A re-transurethral resection of the bladder (re-TURB) is a well-established approach in managing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for various reasons: repeat-TURB is recommended for a macroscopically incomplete initial resection, restaging-TURB is required if the first resection was macroscopically complete but contained no detrusor muscle (DM) and second-TURB is advised for all completely resected T1-tumors with DM in the resection specimen. This study assessed the long-term outcomes after repeat-, second-, and restaging-TURB in T1-NMIBC patients. METHODS Individual patient data with tumor characteristics of 1660 primary T1-patients (muscle-invasion at re-TURB omitted) diagnosed from 1990 to 2018 in 17 hospitals were analyzed. Time to recurrence, progression, death due to bladder cancer (BC), and all causes (OS) were visualized with cumulative incidence functions and analyzed by log-rank tests and multivariable Cox-regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS Median follow-up was 45.3 (IQR 22.7-81.1) months. There were no differences in time to recurrence, progression, or OS between patients undergoing restaging (135 patients), second (644 patients), or repeat-TURB (84 patients), nor between patients who did or who did not undergo second or restaging-TURB. However, patients who underwent repeat-TURB had a shorter time to BC death compared to those who had second- or restaging-TURB (multivariable HR 3.58, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Prognosis did not significantly differ between patients who underwent restaging- or second-TURB. However, a worse prognosis in terms of death due to bladder cancer was found in patients who underwent repeat-TURB compared to second-TURB and restaging-TURB, highlighting the importance of separately evaluating different indications for re-TURB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Alemany
- Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Pešl
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Pathology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Urology, Royal Free London-NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Pathology, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
- European Association of Urology, Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
- Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Juan Fita MJ, Anido Herranz U, Mendez-Vidal MJ, Gironés-Sarrió R, Muñoz-Langa J, Sepúlveda-Sánchez J, Mellado B, Alvarez-Fernandez C, Heras López L, López-Guerrero JA, García-Casado Z, Calatrava A, Ángel Climent M. Phase II Trial Evaluating Olaparib Maintenance in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Responsive or Stabilized on Docetaxel Treatment: SOGUG-IMANOL Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5223. [PMID: 37958398 PMCID: PMC10649956 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The SOGUG-IMANOL trial was a phase 2, uncontrolled, Spanish multicenter study to assess the effect of maintenance treatment with olaparib on radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who achieved partial or complete response or disease stabilization on docetaxel treatment and had a documented germline/somatic mutation in any of the homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Patients received olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily. From the screened population (n = 134), 26 (19.4%) somatic mutations were found, and 14 patients were included in the study. The median radiographic PFS was 11.1 (95%CI, 5.7 to 16.5) months. The median PSA-PFS was 3.5 (95%CI, 1.0 to 6.0) months, and the median clinical PFS was 14.7 (95%CI, 1.8 to 27.5 months). Clinical benefit was observed in 12 patients (85.7%, 95%CI 67.4% to 100%), including two patients with partial response and 10 with stable disease. Six patients reported grade 3-5 adverse events: asthenia (n = 3), anemia (n = 2) and neutropenia (n = 1). In this setting, olaparib has been shown to be an efficacious maintenance treatment in terms of radiographic PFS and clinical benefit, becoming a therapeutic option for some patients harboring an HRR gene mutation and in scenarios where further investigation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María José Juan Fita
- Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Carrer del Professor Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Urbano Anido Herranz
- Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - María José Mendez-Vidal
- Medical Oncology, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (HURS), 14004 Córdoba, Spain;
| | | | - José Muñoz-Langa
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, 46015 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Juan Sepúlveda-Sánchez
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Begoña Mellado
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Alvarez-Fernandez
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain;
| | - Lucía Heras López
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Unidad de Sarcomas, Melanoma y Genitourinario, Institut Català d’Oncologia, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain;
| | - José Antonio López-Guerrero
- Laboratory of Molecuar Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain or (J.A.L.-G.); (Z.G.-C.)
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of València, 46001 Valencia, Spain
| | - Zaida García-Casado
- Laboratory of Molecuar Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain or (J.A.L.-G.); (Z.G.-C.)
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Servicio Anatomía Patológica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Miguel Ángel Climent
- Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Carrer del Professor Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neves RPD, Chagoyen M, Martinez-Lorente A, Iñiguez C, Calatrava A, Calabuig J, Iborra FJ. Each Cellular Compartment Has a Characteristic Protein Reactive Cysteine Ratio Determining Its Sensitivity to Oxidation. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023; 12:1274. [PMID: 37372004 DOI: 10.3390/antiox12061274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Signaling and detoxification of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are important patho-physiologcal processes. Despite this, we lack comprehensive information on individual cells and cellular structures and functions affected by ROS, which is essential to build quantitative models of the effects of ROS. The thiol groups from cysteines (Cys) in proteins play a major role in redox defense, signaling, and protein function. In this study, we show that the proteins in each subcellular compartment contain a characteristic Cys amount. Using a fluorescent assay for -SH in thiolate form and amino groups in proteins, we show that the thiolate content correlates with ROS sensitivity and signaling properties of each compartment. The highest absolute thiolate concentration was found in the nucleolus, followed by the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm whereas protein thiolate groups per protein showed an inverse pattern. In the nucleoplasm, protein reactive thiols concentrated in SC35 speckles, SMN, and the IBODY that accumulated oxidized RNA. Our findings have important functional consequences, and explain differential sensitivity to ROS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Pires das Neves
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, CIBB-Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal
- IIIUC-Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, University of Coimbra, 3030-789 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Mónica Chagoyen
- Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CSIC, Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Martinez-Lorente
- Unidad de Investigación, Innovación y Docencia Médica, Hospital Universitario Vinalopó, 03293 Elx, Spain
- Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), 46020 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Biotecnology, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
| | - Carlos Iñiguez
- Department of Biotecnology, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, 46009 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Francisco J Iborra
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, CSIC, Jaime Roig 11, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), Primo Yufera 3, 46012 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lozano R, Castro E, Lopez-Campos F, Thorne H, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Aragon IM, Cendón-Florez Y, Gutierrez-Pecharroman A, Salles DC, Romero-Laorden N, Lorente D, González-Peramato P, Calatrava A, Alonso C, Anido U, Arévalo-Lobera S, Balmaña J, Chirivella I, Juan-Fita MJ, Llort G, y Cajal TR, Almagro E, Alameda D, López-Casas PP, Herrera B, Mateo J, Pritchard CC, Antonarakis ES, Lotan TL, Rubio-Briones J, Sandhu S, Olmos D. Impact of concurrent tumor events on the prostate cancer outcomes of germline BRCA2 mutation carriers. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:105-118. [PMID: 36972661 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have reported the association of germline BRCA2 (gBRCA2) mutations with poor clinical outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa), but the impact of concurrent somatic events on gBRCA2 carriers survival and disease progression is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS To ascertain the role of frequent somatic genomic alterations and histology subtypes in the outcomes of gBRCA2 mutation carriers and non-carriers, we correlated the tumour characteristics and clinical outcomes of 73 gBRCA2 and 127 non-carriers. Fluorescent in-situ hybridisation and next-generation sequencing were used to detect copy number variations in BRCA2, RB1, MYC and PTEN. Presence of intraductal and cribriform subtypes was also assessed. The independent impact of these events on cause-specific survival (CSS), metastasis-free survival and time to castration-resistant disease was assessed using cox-regression models. RESULTS Somatic BRCA2-RB1 co-deletion (41% versus 12%, p < 0.001) and MYC amplification (53.4% versus 18.8%, p < 0.001) were enriched in gBRCA2 compared to sporadic tumours. Median CSS from diagnosis of PCa was 9.1 versus 17.6 years in gBRCA2 carriers and non-carriers, respectively (HR 2.12; p = 0.002), Median CSS in gBRCA2 carriers increased to 11.3 and 13.4 years in the absence of BRCA2-RB1 deletion or MYC amplification, respectively. Median CSS of non-carriers decreased to 8 and 2.6 years if BRCA2-RB1 deletion or MYC amplification were detected. CONCLUSIONS gBRCA2-related prostate tumours are enriched for aggressive genomic features, such as BRCA2-RB1 co-deletion and MYC amplification. The presence or absence of these events modify the outcomes of gBRCA2 carriers.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sylvester RJ, Rodríguez O, Hernández V, Turturica D, Bauerová L, Max Bruins H, Bründl J, van der Kwast TH, Brisuda A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Hentschel AE, Kusuma VRM, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Volanis D, Cussenot O, Subiela Henríquez JD, de la Peña E, Pisano F, Pešl M, van der Heijden AG, Herdegen S, Zlotta AR, Hacek J, Calatrava A, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Ashabere D, Haitel A, Côté JF, El Sheikh S, Lunelli L, Algaba F, Alemany I, Soria F, Runneboom W, Breyer J, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Llorente C, Molinaro L, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Evert M, Kiemeney LALM, N'Dow J, Plass K, Čapoun O, Soukup V, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Cohen D, Palou J, Gontero P, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Mostafid AH, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M, Compérat EM, Babjuk M, van Rhijn BWG. Erratum to "European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel" [Eur. Urol. 79(4) (2021) 480-488]. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e140-e141. [PMID: 36841687 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Amir Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Claps F, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LALM, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. Prognosis of Primary Papillary Ta Grade 3 Bladder Cancer in the Non-muscle-invasive Spectrum. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:214-221. [PMID: 36670042 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a relatively rare diagnosis with an ambiguous character owing to the presence of an aggressive G3 component together with the lower malignant potential of the Ta component. The European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC guidelines recently changed the risk stratification for Ta G3 from high risk to intermediate, high, or very high risk. However, prognostic studies on Ta G3 carcinomas are limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of categorizing Ta G3 compared to Ta G2 and T1 G3 carcinomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta-T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals were analyzed. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Time to recurrence and time to progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox-regression models with interaction terms stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Ta G3 represented 7.5% (387/5170) of Ta-T1 carcinomas of which 42% were classified as intermediate risk. Time to recurrence did not differ between Ta G3 and Ta G2 (p = 0.9) or T1 G3 (p = 0.4). Progression at 5 yr occurred for 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-4.8%) of Ta G2, 13% (95% CI 9.3-17%) of Ta G3, and 20% (95% CI 17-23%) of T1 G3 carcinomas. Time to progression for Ta G3 was shorter than for Ta G2 (p < 0.001) and longer than for T1 G3 (p = 0.002). Patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) had worse prognosis and a similar time to progression as for patients with T1 G3 NMIBC with CIS (p = 0.5). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS The prognosis of Ta G3 tumors in terms of progression appears to be in between that of Ta G2 and T1 G3. However, patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant CIS have worse prognosis that is comparable to that of T1 G3 with CIS. Our results support the recent EAU NMIBC guideline changes for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 tumors because many of these patients have better prognosis than previously thought. PATIENT SUMMARY We used data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada to assess the prognosis for patients with stage Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Time to cancer progression for Ta G3 cancer differed from both Ta G2 and T1 G3 tumors. Our results support the recent change in the European Association of Urology guidelines for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 NMIBC because many patients with this tumor have better prognosis than previously thought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Claps
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Deaprtment of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beijert IJ, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Subiela Henríquez JD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Maxim Bruins H, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VRM, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Masson-Lecomte A, Liedberg F, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, El Sheikh S, Volanis D, Côté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, A L M Kiemeney L, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Ribal MJ, van der Kwast TH, Babjuk M, Sylvester RJ, van Rhijn BWG. T1G1 Bladder Cancer: Prognosis for this Rare Pathological Diagnosis Within the Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Spectrum. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1627-1634. [PMID: 35577750 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathological existence and clinical consequence of stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer are the subject of debate. Even though the diagnosis of T1G1 is controversial, several reports have consistently found a prevalence of 2-6% G1 in their T1 series. However, it remains unclear if T1G1 carcinomas have added value as a separate category to predict prognosis within the non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) spectrum. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value of T1G1 carcinomas compared to TaG1 and T1G2 carcinomas within the NMIBC spectrum. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta and T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals in Europe and Canada were analyzed. Transurethral resection (TUR) was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Time to recurrence and progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS T1G1 represented 1.9% (99/5170) of all carcinomas and 5.3% (99/1859) of T1 carcinomas. According to primary TUR dates, the proportion of T1G1 varied between 0.9% and 3.5% per year, with similar percentages in the early and later calendar years. We found no difference in time to recurrence between T1G1 and TaG1 (p = 0.91) or between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Time to progression significantly differed between TaG1 and T1G1 (p < 0.001) but not between T1G1 and T1G2 (p = 0.30). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS The relative prevalence of T1G1 diagnosis was low and remained constant over the past three decades. Time to recurrence of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for other stage/grade NMIBC combinations. Time to progression of T1G1 NMIBC was comparable to that for T1G2 but not for TaG1, suggesting that treatment and surveillance of T1G1 carcinomas should be more like the approaches for T1G2 NMIBC in accordance with the intermediate and/or high risk categories of the European Association of Urology NMIBC guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY Although rare, stage T1 grade 1 (T1G1) bladder cancer is still diagnosed in daily clinical practice. Using individual patient data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada, we found that time to progression of T1G1 cancer was comparable to that for T1G2 but not TaG1 cancer. Therefore, our results suggest that primary T1G1 bladder cancers should be managed with more aggressive treatment and more frequent follow-up than for low-risk bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene J Beijert
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC no. 5, Oncotype-Uro, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Maria J Ribal
- European Association of Urology, Guidelines Office Board, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Claps F, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Mascaros J, Gomez-Ferrer A, Marenco J, Collado-Serra A, Casanova J, Calatrava A, Trombetta C, Rubio-Briones J. Reimagining pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy: insights from a large series of fuorescence-guided procedures. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(21)01014-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
9
|
Fiorella D, Marenco JL, Mascarós JM, Borque-Fernando Á, Esteban LM, Calatrava A, Pastor B, López-Guerrero JA, Rubio-Briones J. Role of PCA3 and SelectMDx in the optimization of active surveillance in prostate cancer. Actas Urol Esp 2021; 45:439-446. [PMID: 34148844 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES A not negligible percentage of patients included in active surveillance (AS) for low and very low risk prostate cancer (PCa) are reclassified in the confirmatory biopsy or have disease progression during follow-up. Our aim is to evaluate the role of PCA3 and SelectMDx, in an individual and combined way, in the prediction of pathological progression (PP) in a standard AS program. MATERIALS & METHODS Prospective and observational study comprised of 86 patients enrolled in an AS program from 2009 to 2019, with results for PCA3 and SelectMDx previous to PCa diagnosis or during their confirmatory period. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to correlate PCA3 and SelectMDx scores as well as clinical and pathological variables with PP-free survival (PPFS). The most reliable cut-offs for both biomarkers in the context of AS were defined. RESULTS SelectMDx showed statistically significant differences related to PPFS (HR 1.035, 95%CI: 1.012-1.057) (p = 0.002) with a C-index of 0.670 (95%CI: 0.529-0.810) and AUC of 0.714 (95%CI: 0.603-0.825) at 5 years. In our series, the most reliable cut-off point for SelectMDx was 5, with a sensitivity and specificity for PP of 69.8% and 67.4%, respectively. Same figure for PCA3 was 65, with a sensitivity and specificity for PP of 51.16% and 74.42%, respectively. The combination of both biomarkers did not improve the prediction of PP, C-index 0.630 (95%CI: 0.455-0.805). CONCLUSIONS In the context of low or very low risk PCa, SelectMDx > 5 predicted 5 years PP free survival with a moderate discrimination ability outperforming PCA3. The combination of both tests did not improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Fiorella
- Departamento de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - J L Marenco
- Departamento de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - J M Mascarós
- Departamento de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Á Borque-Fernando
- Departamento de Urología, IIS-Aragón, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - L M Esteban
- Departamento de Matemáticas Aplicadas, Escuela Universitaria Politécnica de La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, La Almuniade Doña Godina, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - A Calatrava
- Departamento de Patología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - B Pastor
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - J A López-Guerrero
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; IVO-CIPF Joint Research Unit of Cancer, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), Valencia, Spain; Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Rubio-Briones
- Departamento de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Valiquette A, Marchioni M, Rubio-Briones J, Wong A, Gomez-Ferrer A, Collado Serra A, Marenco J, Casanova Ramon-Borja J, Ramirez Backhaus M, Dominguez J, Sanchez Aparisi E, Calatrava A, Mir M. Utility of ex vivo confocal fluorescence microscopy for renal mass biopsy optimization. Eur Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(21)00976-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Fiorella D, Marenco J, Mascarós J, Borque-Fernando A, Esteban L, Calatrava A, Pastor B, López-Guerrero J, Rubio-Briones J. Role of PCA3 and SelectMDx in the optimization of active surveillance in prostate cancer. Actas Urol Esp 2021. [PMID: 33926745 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES A not negligible percentage of patients included in active surveillance (AS) for low and very low risk prostate cancer (PCa) are reclassified in the confirmatory biopsy or have disease progression during follow-up. Our aim is to evaluate the role of PCA3 and SelectMDx, in an individual and combined way, in the prediction of pathological progression (PP) in a standard AS program. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prospective and observational study comprised of 86 patients enrolled in an AS program from 2009 to 2019, with results for PCA3 and SelectMDx previous to PCa diagnosis or during their confirmatory period. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to correlate PCA3 and SelectMDx scores as well as clinical and pathological variables with PP-free survival (PPFS). The most reliable cut-offs for both biomarkers in the context of AS were defined. RESULTS SelectMDx showed statistically significant differences related to PPFS (HR: 1.035; 95%CI: 1.012-1.057) (P=.002) with a C-index of 0.670 (95%CI: 0.529-0.810) and AUC of 0.714 (95%CI: 0.603-0.825) at 5years. In our series, the most reliable cut-off point for SelectMDx was 5, with a sensitivity and specificity for PP of 69.8% and 67.4%, respectively. Same figure for PCA3 was 65, with a sensitivity and specificity for PP of 51.16% and 74.42%, respectively. The combination of both biomarkers did not improve the prediction of PP, C-index 0.630 (95%CI: 0.455-0.805). CONCLUSIONS In the context of low or very low risk PCa, SelectMDx >5 predicted 5years PP free survival with a moderate discrimination ability outperforming PCA3. The combination of both tests did not improved outcomes.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sylvester RJ, Rodríguez O, Hernández V, Turturica D, Bauerová L, Bruins HM, Bründl J, van der Kwast TH, Brisuda A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Hentschel AE, Kusuma VRM, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Volanis D, Cussenot O, Subiela Henríquez JD, de la Peña E, Pisano F, Pešl M, van der Heijden AG, Herdegen S, Zlotta AR, Hacek J, Calatrava A, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Ashabere D, Haitel A, Côté JF, El Sheikh S, Lunelli L, Algaba F, Alemany I, Soria F, Runneboom W, Breyer J, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Llorente C, Molinaro L, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Evert M, Kiemeney LALM, N'Dow J, Plass K, Čapoun O, Soukup V, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Cohen D, Palou J, Gontero P, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Mostafid AH, Shariat SF, Rouprêt M, Compérat EM, Babjuk M, van Rhijn BWG. European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2021; 79:480-488. [PMID: 33419683 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are used to provide recommendations for patient treatment after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). They do not, however, take into account the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading classification and are based on patients treated in the 1980s. OBJECTIVE To update EAU prognostic factor risk groups using the WHO 1973 and 2004/2016 grading classifications and identify patients with the lowest and highest probabilities of progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data for primary NMIBC patients were collected from the institutions of the members of the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel. INTERVENTION Patients underwent TURBT followed by intravesical instillations at the physician's discretion. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were fitted to the primary endpoint, the time to progression to muscle-invasive disease or distant metastases. Patients were divided into four risk groups: low-, intermediate-, high-, and a new, very high-risk group. The probabilities of progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 3401 patients treated with TURBT ± intravesical chemotherapy were included. From the multivariable analyses, tumor stage, WHO 1973/2004-2016 grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ, number of tumors, tumor size, and age were used to form four risk groups for which the probability of progression at 5 yr varied from <1% to >40%. Limitations include the retrospective collection of data and the lack of central pathology review. CONCLUSIONS This study provides updated EAU prognostic factor risk groups that can be used to inform patient treatment and follow-up. Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and 1973 grading classifications, a new, very high-risk group has been identified for which urologists should be prompt to assess and adapt their therapeutic strategy when necessary. PATIENT SUMMARY The newly updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide an improved basis for recommending a patient's treatment and follow-up schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Oscar Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginia Hernández
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Turturica
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Lenka Bauerová
- Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Theo H van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antonin Brisuda
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anouk E Hentschel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Venkata R M Kusuma
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Nicolai Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliette Cotte
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Volanis
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Enrique de la Peña
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Pisano
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Michael Pešl
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Sonja Herdegen
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jaromir Hacek
- Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Ashabere
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Andrea Haitel
- Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean-François Côté
- Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Soha El Sheikh
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Alemany
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Willemien Runneboom
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Breyer
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Llorente
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Otakar Čapoun
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Viktor Soukup
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jose L Dominguez-Escrig
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Cohen
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joan Palou
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Gontero
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Amir Hugh Mostafid
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Eva M Compérat
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Marko Babjuk
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Claps F, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Maresma M, Gomez-Ferrer A, Mascaros J, Collado-Serra A, Marenco J, Dominguez-Escrig J, Casanova J, Calatrava A, Trombetta C, Rubio-Briones J. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a real-time lymphangiography with transperineal injection of indocyanine green: Results from a prospective study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)35364-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
14
|
Marenco J, Calatrava A, Casanova J, Claps F, Mascaros J, Wong A, Barrios M, Martin I, Rubio J. Evaluation of Fluorescent Confocal Microscopy for Intraoperative Analysis of Prostate Biopsy Cores. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 7:1254-1259. [PMID: 32912840 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis of prostate cancer is based on histopathological evaluation, which is time-consuming. Fluorescent confocal microscopy (FCM) is a novel technique that allows rapid tissue analysis. OBJECTIVE To determine if FCM could be used for real-time diagnosis of prostate cancer and evaluate concordance with traditional analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From January 2019 to March 2020, 182 magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy cores from 57 consecutive biopsy-naïve men with suspected prostate cancer were taken. These were intraoperatively stained with acridine orange for analysis using FCM (VivaScope; MAVIG, Munich, Germany) and subsequently sent for traditional haematoxylin-eosin histopathological (HEH) examination. Two expert uropathologists analysed the FCM and HEH cores blinded to the counterpart results in a single institution. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Agreement between FCM and HEH analysis in terms of the presence of cancer was analysed at biopsy core and region of interest (ROI) levels, considering HEH as the reference test. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS FCM allowed intraoperative assessment of prostate biopsy cores with strong histopathological evaluation agreement: Cohen's κ for agreement was 0.81 at the biopsy core level and 0.69 for the ROI level. Positive predictive values (85% and 83.78%) and negative predictive values (95.1% and 85.71%) were high at the biopsy core and ROI levels. These initial results are encouraging, but given the single-centre and preliminary nature of the study, further confirmation is required. CONCLUSIONS FCM allowed rapid evaluation of prostate biopsy cores. This technique is feasible and achieves rapid closure with a reliable diagnosis, parallel to the gold standard analysis. Initial results are promising but further studies are needed to validate and define the role of this technique. PATIENT SUMMARY A novel microscopic technique reduces the time needed to obtain a prostate cancer diagnosis by speeding up biopsy processing. Although the initial results are promising; this development needs to be confirmed in further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Marenco
- Urology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Pathology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Casanova
- Urology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Francesco Claps
- Urology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Mascaros
- Urology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Augusto Wong
- Urology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Barrios
- Radiology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Isabel Martin
- Radiology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose Rubio
- Urology Department, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hentschel AE, van Rhijn BW, Bründl J, Compérat EM, Plass K, Rodríguez O, Henríquez JDS, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Alemany I, Turturica D, Pisano F, Soria F, Čapoun O, Bauerová L, Pešl M, Bruins HM, Runneboom W, Herdegen S, Breyer J, Brisuda A, Scavarda-Lamberti A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Seles M, Mannweiler S, Bosschieter J, Kusuma VR, Ashabere D, Huebner N, Cotte J, Mertens LS, Cohen D, Lunelli L, Cussenot O, Sheikh SE, Volanis D, Coté JF, Rouprêt M, Haitel A, Shariat SF, Mostafid AH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Zigeuner R, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Hacek J, Zlotta AR, Burger M, Evert M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van der Heijden AG, Kiemeney LA, Soukup V, Molinaro L, Gontero P, Llorente C, Algaba F, Palou J, N'Dow J, Babjuk M, van der Kwast TH, Sylvester RJ. Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUN-LMP): Still a meaningful histo-pathological grade category for Ta, noninvasive bladder tumors in 2019? Urol Oncol 2020; 38:440-448. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
16
|
Rubio-Briones J, Borque-Fernando A, Esteban LM, Mascarós JM, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Casanova J, Collado A, Mir C, Gómez-Ferrer A, Wong A, Aragón F, Calatrava A, López-Guerrero JA, Groskopf J, Schalken J, Van Criekinge W, Domínguez-Escrig J. Validation of a 2-gene mRNA urine test for the detection of ≥GG2 prostate cancer in an opportunistic screening population. Prostate 2020; 80:500-507. [PMID: 32077525 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A 2-gene urine-based molecular test that targets messenger RNAs known to be overexpressed in aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) has been described as a helpful method for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (grade group [GG] ≥2). We performed an external validation of this test in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy (Bx) within a Spanish opportunistic screening scenario. METHODS We analyzed archived samples from 492 men who underwent prostate Bx in an opportunistic screening scenario, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 3 to 10 ng/mL and/or suspicious digital rectal exploration (DRE) and without previous multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Urinary biomarker measurements were combined with clinical risk factors to determine a risk score, and accuracy for GG ≥ 2 PCa detection was compared with PCA3, European randomized screening in prostate cancer (ERSPC), and prostate biopsy collaborative group (PBCG) risk calculators in a validation workup that included calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility analysis. RESULTS In our cohort, the detection rates for GG1 and GG ≥ 2 PCa were 20.3% and 14.0%, respectively. The median PSA level was 3.9 ng/mL and 13.4% of subjects had suspicious DRE findings. The median risk score for men with GG ≥ 2 PCa was 21 (interquartile range: 14-28), significantly higher than benign+GG1 PCa (10, 6-18), P < .001, achieving the highest area under the curve among the models tested, 0.749 (95% confidence interval: 0.690-0.807). The urine test was well-calibrated, while ERSPC showed a slight underestimation and PBCG a slight overestimation of risk. Assuming a GG2 non-detection rate of 11% without using mpMRI, use of the urinary biomarker-based clinical model could have helped avoid 37.2% of excess biopsies while delaying the diagnosis of eight patients (1.6% of the entire cohort) with GG ≥ 2 PCa. CONCLUSIONS In this first evaluation in an opportunistic screening population, the urinary biomarker-based test improved the detection of clinically significant PCa. Facing men with elevated PSA and/or suspicious DRE, it could be a useful tool to help avoid excess initial Bx and to identify patients most likely to benefit from Bx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Angel Borque-Fernando
- Department of Urology, IIS-Aragón, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Luis M Esteban
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Universitary Politecnic School of La Almunia, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan M Mascarós
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Juan Casanova
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Argimiro Collado
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Augusto Wong
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fuensanta Aragón
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose A López-Guerrero
- Department of Urology, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jack Groskopf
- Department of Research in Biomarkers, MDxHealth, Irvine, California
| | - Jack Schalken
- Department of Experimental Urology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mir MC, Bancalari B, Calatrava A, Casanova J, Dominguez Escrig JL, Ramirez-Backhaus M, Gomez-Ferrer A, Collado A, Wong A, Iborra I, Sanmarti O, Rubio-Briones J. Ex-vivo confocal fluorescence microscopy for rapid evaluation of renal core biopsy. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 72:109-113. [PMID: 31833726 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03627-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Small renal mass incidentally diagnosed are common findings nowadays due to the widespread of imaging. Renal mass biopsy is still underutilized by urologists due to its non-diagnostic rates. Confocal microscopy allows for rapid imaging of fresh tissue samples. We report the feasibility of using confocal technology for determining the quality of the renal core at renal mass biopsy on 4 consecutive cases at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain -
| | - Bernardo Bancalari
- Department of Dermatology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Casanova
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Alvaro Gomez-Ferrer
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Argimiro Collado
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Augusto Wong
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Immaculada Iborra
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Onofre Sanmarti
- Department of Dermatology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rubio-Briones J, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Gómez-Ferrer A, Mir C, Domínguez-Escrig J, Collado A, Iborra I, Casanova J, Solsona E, Mascarós J, Calatrava A. Long-term oncological results of treatment for high-risk prostate cancer using radical prostatectomy in a cancer hospital. Actas Urol Esp 2018; 42:507-515. [PMID: 29631913 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2018.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyse the most relevant oncologic results of treatment using radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) in a specialist cancer hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS A descriptive retrospective study of RP was conducted at our centre from 1986 to 2017 on HRPC whose primary objective was to determine overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The study's secondary objectives were to determine biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), rescue therapy-free survival (RTFS), hormone therapy-free survival (HTFS) and the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer. We performed a Cox regression analysis to establish predictive models and to better understand the weight of each variable that defines high risk. RESULTS A total of 2093 RPs were performed, 480 (22.9%) of which were for HRPC. The median follow-up for the overall series was 79.57 months (P25-75 37.92-135.16). Lymphadenectomy was not performed in 6.5% of the cases. The lymphadenectomy was of the obturator type in 51.2% of the cases and extended in 42.3%. Overall survival at 5, 10 and 15 years was 89.8% (95% CI 86.7-92.9%), 73.3% (95% CI 68-78.6%) and 51.4% (95% CI 43.8-59%), respectively. CSS at 5, 10 and 15 years was 94.8% (95% CI 92.4-97.2%), 84.0% (95% CI 79.3-88.7%) and 75.5% (95% CI 68.8-82.2%), respectively. MFS at 5, 10 and 15 years was 87.4% (95% CI 84.1-90.7%), 72.2% (95% CI 66.7-77.7%) and 61.7% (95% CI 54.3-69.1%), respectively. A total of 120 patients of 477 analysed (25.1%) required rescue radiation therapy, and 293/477 never required hormone therapy (61.4%). Of the 93 pN1 patients, 33 (35.5%) did not require hormone therapy. The time from RP to biochemical progression was the variable with the greatest prognostic weight for MFS, CSS and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS RP plus extended lymphadenectomy should be the first therapeutic manoeuvre when feasible within a multimodal strategy. A longer follow-up of the series is needed to validate the hypothesis of better oncologic results based on the earlier implementation of rescue radiation therapy, extended lymphadenectomy and drugs that prolong survival in the CRPC phase.
Collapse
|
19
|
Borque-Fernando Á, Rubio-Briones J, Esteban LM, Dong Y, Calatrava A, Gómez-Ferrer Á, Gómez-Gómez E, Gil Fabra JM, Rodríguez-García N, López González PÁ, García-Rodríguez J, Rodrigo-Aliaga M, Herrera-Imbroda B, Soto-Villalba J, Martínez-Breijo S, Hernández-Cañas V, Soto-Poveda AM, Sánchez-Rodríguez C, Carrillo-George C, Hernández-Martínez YE, Okrongly D. Role of the 4Kscore test as a predictor of reclassification in prostate cancer active surveillance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2018; 22:84-90. [PMID: 30108375 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0074-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of active surveillance (AS) in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients could be improved with new biomarkers, such as the 4Kscore test. We analyze its ability to predict tumor reclassification by upgrading at the confirmatory biopsy at 6 months. METHODS Observational, prospective, blinded, and non-randomized study, within the Spanish National Registry on AS (AEU/PIEM/2014/0001; NCT02865330) with 181 patients included after initial Bx and inclusion criteria: PSA ≤10 ng/mL, cT1c-T2a, Grade group 1, ≤2 cores, and ≤5 mm/50% length core involved. Central pathological review of initial and confirmatory Bx was performed on all biopsy specimens. Plasma was collected 6 months after initial Bx and just before confirmatory Bx to determine 4Kscore result. In order to predict reclassification defined as Grade group ≥2, we analyzed 4Kscore, percent free to total (%f/t) PSA ratio, prostate volume, PSA density, family history, body mass index, initial Bx, total cores, initial Bx positive cores, initial Bx % of positive cores, initial Bx maximum cancer core length and initial Bx cancer % involvement. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, non-parametric trend test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate established differences between groups of reclassification. RESULTS A total of 137 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients (13.1%) were reclassified at confirmatory Bx. The %f/t PSA ratio and 4Kscore showed differences between the groups of reclassification (Yes/No). Using 7.5% as cutoff for the 4Kscore, we found a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 29%, with no reclassifications to Grade group 3 for patients with 4Kscore below 7.5% and 2 (6%) missed Grade group 2 reclassified patients. Using this threshold value there is a biopsy reduction of 27%. Additionally, 4Kscore was also associated with changes in tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary findings suggest that the 4Kscore may be a useful tool in the decision-making process to perform a confirmatory Bx in active surveillance management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángel Borque-Fernando
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet. IIS Aragon., Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis M Esteban
- Escuela Universitaria Politécnica La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Yan Dong
- OPKO Diagnostics, Woburn, MA, USA
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Jesús M Gil Fabra
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet. IIS Aragon., Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Miguel Rodrigo-Aliaga
- Department of Urology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón de La Plana, Spain
| | | | - Juan Soto-Villalba
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Sara Martínez-Breijo
- Department of Urology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Herrero-Vicent C, Guerrero A, Gavilá J, Gozalbo F, Hernández A, Sandiego S, Algarra MA, Calatrava A, Guillem-Porta V, Ruiz-Simón A. Predictive and prognostic impact of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ecancermedicalscience 2017; 11:759. [PMID: 28900472 PMCID: PMC5574654 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In locally and locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) only induces a pCR in 30-35% of patients. Clinical and pathological factors are not enough to distinguish the patients who have no chance of a pCR or not. The tumour microenvironment is critical for cancer and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). Moreover, the NAC scenario is the perfect setting to study possible changes in TIL levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using our prospective maintained breast cancer (BC) database, we identified 164 TNBC patients treated with NAC between 1998 and 2015 with enough samples of diagnostic biopsy and after surgery. Evaluation of TILs before and after NAC followed a standardised methodology for visual assessment on haematoxylin-eosin sections and the amounts of TILs were quantitated in deciles. We categorised lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer cutoff according to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. We categorised LPBC as involving > 40% lymphocytic infiltration tumour stroma. The primary end point was predictive value of TILs to NAC, and the secondary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). DFS was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the groups were compared with a long-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to generate hazard ratios for determining associations between variables such as TIL after NAC and DFS. RESULTS A total of 164 TNBC patients were treated with NAC and surgery. The main patients' characteristics are listed in Table 1. We identify different pathological complete response to anthracycline and taxane-based NAC; LPBC subgroup 51 from 58 patients (88%) pCR versus non- lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) subgroup 10 from 106 (9%) pCR, p = 0.001. At a median follow-up of 78 months, LPBC was associated with better DFS; the three-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for DFS were 2% and 30 % for patients with LPBC and non-LPBC, respectively, p = 0.01. Univariate and multivariate analysis confirmed TIL to be an independent prognostic marker of DFS. CONCLUSIONS Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes could be routinely used in locally advanced TNBC treated with anthracycline and taxane, such as biomarker, to be enabled the identification of different two subgroups: LPBC patients have a very high response to NAC pCR 88%, meanwhile non-LPBC patients only achieve 9%. Moreover, non-LPBC patients have a worse prognosis than LPBC patients. This data verified the predictive and prognostic value of TIL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angel Guerrero
- Medical Oncology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology, 46008 Valencia, Spain
| | - Joaquin Gavilá
- Medical Oncology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology, 46008 Valencia, Spain
| | - Francisco Gozalbo
- Pathology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology, 46008 Valencia, Spain
| | - Abraham Hernández
- Medical Oncology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology, 46008 Valencia, Spain
| | - Sergio Sandiego
- Medical Oncology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology, 46008 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Ana Calatrava
- Pathology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology, 46008 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Amparo Ruiz-Simón
- Medical Oncology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology, 46008 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mancarella C, Casanova-Salas I, Calatrava A, García-Flores M, Garofalo C, Grilli A, Rubio-Briones J, Scotlandi K, López-Guerrero JA. Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor affects the survival of primary prostate cancer patients depending on TMPRSS2-ERG status. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:367. [PMID: 28545426 PMCID: PMC5445474 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3356-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is characterized by clinical and biological heterogeneity and has differential outcomes and mortality rates. Therefore, it is necessary to identify molecular alterations to define new therapeutic strategies based on the risk of progression. In this study, the prognostic relevance of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system was examined in molecular subtypes defined by TMPRSS2-ERG (T2E) gene fusion within a series of patients with primary localized PCa. Methods A cohort of 270 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) primary PCa samples from patients with more than 5 years’ follow-up was collected. IGF-1R, IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and INSR expression was analyzed using quantitative RT-PCR. The T2E status and immunohistochemical ERG findings were considered in the analyses. The association with both biochemical and clinical progression-free survival (BPFS and PFS, respectively) was evaluated for the different molecular subtypes using the Kaplan-Meier proportional risk log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results An association between IGF-1R overexpression and better BPFS was found in T2E-negative patients (35.3% BPFS, p-value = 0.016). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that IGF-1R expression constitutes an independent variable in T2E-negative patients [HR: 0.41. CI 95% (0.2–0.82), p = 0.013]. These data were confirmed using immunohistochemistry of ERG as subrogate of T2E. High IGF-1 expression correlated with prolonged BPFS and PFS independent of the T2E status. Conclusions IGF-1R, a reported target of T2E, constitutes an independent factor for good prognosis in T2E-negative PCa. Quantitative evaluation of IGF-1/IGF-1R expression combined with molecular assessment of T2E status or ERG protein expression represents a useful marker for tumor progression in localized PCa. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3356-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Mancarella
- CRS Development of Biomolecular Therapies, Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Irene Casanova-Salas
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria García-Flores
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cecilia Garofalo
- CRS Development of Biomolecular Therapies, Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Grilli
- CRS Development of Biomolecular Therapies, Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain
| | - Katia Scotlandi
- CRS Development of Biomolecular Therapies, Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
| | - José Antonio López-Guerrero
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Herrero-Vicent C, Guerrero A, Gavilá J, Gozalbo F, Blanch S, Hernández A, Sandiego S, Calatrava A, Guillem V, Ruiz A. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw363.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
Fuentes-Pastor J, Pellejero P, Ortiz I, Ramírez-Backhaus M, de Gracia A, Marrugo C, Gomez-Ferrer A, Calatrava A, Rubio-Briones J, Rodriguez-Torreblanca C, Solsona-Narbón E. Association between late-onset hypogonadism syndrome plus metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer and its aggressiveness. Actas Urol Esp 2016; 40:440-5. [PMID: 27091367 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2015] [Revised: 02/07/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between prostate cancer (PC) and the presence of metabolic syndrome and late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHOD A retrospective study was conducted on 686 patients who underwent prostate biopsy. We analysed the demographic variables, clinical data and biopsy results. To diagnose metabolic syndrome, we employed the criteria of the American Heart Association. For the diagnosis of LOH syndrome, we employed the Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male questionnaire and testosterone levels (TT). We evaluated the relationship between free testosterone (FT) and bioavailable testosterone (BT) on one hand and PC and its aggressiveness on the other, as well as the usefulness of the TT to prostate specific antigen (TT/PSA) ratio in the PC diagnosis. RESULTS The patient's median age was 65 years. Metabolic syndrome is not associated with PC (39.4% vs. 35%; P=.1) but is associated with a PC Gleason score >7 (50.4% vs. 29.44%; P=.002). LOH, low FT and low BT are associated with an increased presence of PC (51% vs. 35%, P=.02; 44.86% vs. 33.33%, P=.03; and 46.46% vs. 33.08%, P=.01, respectively) and with an increased probability of a PC Gleason score >7 (61.54% vs. 37.5%, P=.02; 54.17% vs. 34.12%, P=.02; 54.35% vs. 34.48%, P=.02, respectively). Additionally, the median TT/PSA ratio was significantly lower in patients with positive biopsies (P=.022). CONCLUSIONS Metabolic syndrome was not associated with the probability of having PC but was associated with a PC Gleason score >7. Moreover, LOH syndrome had a higher percentage of PC and a greater presence of PC Gleason scores >7, as did low levels of FT and low levels of BT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Fuentes-Pastor
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Marqués de Valdecilla (HUMV), Santander, España
| | - P Pellejero
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, España
| | - I Ortiz
- Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Universidad de Almería, Almería, España
| | - M Ramírez-Backhaus
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, España.
| | - A de Gracia
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, España
| | - C Marrugo
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, España
| | - A Gomez-Ferrer
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, España
| | - A Calatrava
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, España
| | - J Rubio-Briones
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, España
| | | | - E Solsona-Narbón
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ramírez-Backhaus M, Fernández-Serra A, Rubio-Briones J, Cruz Garcia P, Calatrava A, Garcia Casado Z, Casanova Salas I, Rubio L, Solsona E, López-Guerrero J. External validation of FXYD3 and KRT20 as predictive biomarkers for the presence of micrometastasis in muscle invasive bladder cancer lymph nodes. Actas Urol Esp 2015; 39:473-81. [PMID: 25920992 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2014] [Revised: 02/09/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent studies have proposed that FXYD3 and KRT20 mRNA quantified by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in paraffin could be biomarkers to detect lymph nodes with micrometastases that avoid detection by conventional analysis with hematoxylin-eosin (HE). A validation study was conducted on the lymph nodes of patients who underwent radical cystectomy. OBJECTIVE To classify the adenopathic state of a sample of patients who underwent cystectomy, based on the lymph node expression of FXYD3 and KRT20. The secondary objective was to assess whether there is a differential oncologic evolution for the patients, depending on the lymph node expression of these proteins. MATERIAL AND METHOD The study included lymph nodes from 64 patients who underwent cystectomy for infiltrating bladder tumor: The model was developed using metastatic lymph nodes from 15 patients and lymph nodes from 4 patients with no known tumor. Genetic expression was measured using real-time qRT-PCR. We calculated (using qRT-PCR) the median expression of FXYD3 and KRT20 mRNA in the lymph node tissue. We then analyzed the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, according to the function y=0.1400+0.250FXYD3-2.532. The cutoff was established using an ROC curve. The formula was applied to the remaining lymph node tissue, based on the previously established cutoff. The sample was classified into 4 subgroups: HE- qRT-PCR-, HE- qRT-PCR+, HE+ qRT-PCR+ y HE+, qRT-PCR-. A descriptive, comparative analysis was performed, as well as a metastatic progression-free survival analysis, calculating the Kaplan and Meyer curves for the 3 established subgroups. The test results were considered statistically significant at P<.05. RESULTS Using qRT-PCR, we verified that there were differences in the median expression of FXYD3 (P=.05) and KRT20 (P=.009) between the lymph node tissues of patients with benign prostate hyperplasia and those of patients with lymph node metastasis. A cutoff was assigned to 0.377. The sample was classified as follows: 37.5% of the patients were pN0 by HE and pN0 by qRT-PCR (-HE -qRT-PCR), 39.1% were pN0 by HE but metastatic by qRT-PCR (-HE +qRT-PCR), and 15 patients (23.4%) were metastatic by both techniques (+HE +qRT-PCR). The Kaplan and Meyer curves showed poorer metastatic progression-free survival for the patients who were +HE and +qRT-PCR than for the other subgroups, with no significant differences between -HE +qRT-PCR and -HE -qRT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS According to our results, 39.1% of the patients with infiltrating vesical tumors overexpressed the FXYD3 and KRT20 biomarkers and were N0 by HE. We observed no differential clinical behavior among the patients who underwent cystectomy according to their expression of FXYD3 and KRT20 when they were N0 by HE.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ramírez-Backhaus M, Fernández-Serra A, Rubio-Briones J, Cruz Garcia P, Calatrava A, Garcia Casado Z, Casanova Salas I, Rubio L, Solsona E, López-Guerrero J. External validation of FXYD3 and KRT20 as predictive biomarkers for the presence of micrometastasis in muscle invasive bladder cancer lymph nodes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2015.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
26
|
Rubio-Briones J, Borque A, Esteban LM, Casanova J, Fernandez-Serra A, Rubio L, Casanova-Salas I, Sanz G, Domínguez-Escrig J, Collado A, Gómez-Ferrer A, Iborra I, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Martínez F, Calatrava A, Lopez-Guerrero JA. Optimizing the clinical utility of PCA3 to diagnose prostate cancer in initial prostate biopsy. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:633. [PMID: 26362197 PMCID: PMC4567811 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1623-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PCA3 has been included in a nomogram outperforming previous clinical models for the prediction of any prostate cancer (PCa) and high grade PCa (HGPCa) at the initial prostate biopsy (IBx). Our objective is to validate such IBx-specific PCA3-based nomogram. We also aim to optimize the use of this nomogram in clinical practice through the definition of risk groups. Methods Independent external validation. Clinical and biopsy data from a contemporary cohort of 401 men with the same inclusion criteria to those used to build up the reference’s nomogram in IBx. The predictive value of the nomogram was assessed by means of calibration curves and discrimination ability through the area under the curve (AUC). Clinical utility of the nomogram was analyzed by choosing thresholds points that minimize the overlapping between probability density functions (PDF) in PCa and no PCa and HGPCa and no HGPCa groups, and net benefit was assessed by decision curves. Results We detect 28 % of PCa and 11 % of HGPCa in IBx, contrasting to the 46 and 20 % at the reference series. Due to this, there is an overestimation of the nomogram probabilities shown in the calibration curve for PCa. The AUC values are 0.736 for PCa (C.I.95 %:0.68–0.79) and 0.786 for HGPCa (C.I.95 %:0.71–0.87) showing an adequate discrimination ability. PDF show differences in the distributions of nomogram probabilities in PCa and not PCa patient groups. A minimization of the overlapping between these curves confirms the threshold probability of harboring PCa >30 % proposed by Hansen is useful to indicate a IBx, but a cut-off > 40 % could be better in series of opportunistic screening like ours. Similar results appear in HGPCa analysis. The decision curve also shows a net benefit of 6.31 % for the threshold probability of 40 %. Conclusions PCA3 is an useful tool to select patients for IBx. Patients with a calculated probability of having PCa over 40 % should be counseled to undergo an IBx if opportunistic screening is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Angel Borque
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Luis M Esteban
- Escuela Universitaria Politécnica de La Almunia, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Juan Casanova
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | - Luis Rubio
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Irene Casanova-Salas
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Gerardo Sanz
- Department of Statistical Methods, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - Jose Domínguez-Escrig
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Argimiro Collado
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Alvaro Gómez-Ferrer
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Inmaculada Iborra
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, C/ Prof. Beltrán Báguena 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Jose A Lopez-Guerrero
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ramírez-Backhaus M, González-Tampán J, Ortiz-Rodríguez IM, Gómez-Ferrer Á, Rubio-Briones J, Collado-Serra A, Calatrava A, Rodríguez-Torreblanca C, Solsona-Narbón E. Urinary tract symptoms and erectile function in patients at risk of prostate cancer. Actas Urol Esp 2015; 39:360-6. [PMID: 25704504 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2014] [Revised: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE We estimate that more tan 63000 prostate biopsies are performed in our country each year. There are no functional status data of those patients and if there is a relationship between biopsy result and functional status. In order to solve that question we have performed this study. MATERIAL AND METHOD 1,128 prostate biopsies were included. Patients fill in the IPSS, IIEF-5 and ICIQ-SF questionnaires before the prostate biopsy was performed. A prospective data collection of clinical, pathological and questionnaires results was done. A descriptive analysis was carried out. IPSS and IIEF-5 results were categorized. Results were compared depending on the biopsy result. In the subgroup of patients with prostate cancer, questionnaires results were stratify according to the clinical risk group. RESULTS The mean age of the sample was 65. Prostate cancer detection rate was 32,71%, 52,2% of the sample had mild lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and 13,4% had severe LUTS at the time of the biopsy. Regarding the impact of LUTS on quality of life (QOL), only 12,6% showed a perfect QOL. More than 50 percent of patients suffered from some degree of erectile dysfunction at the time of the biopsy. According to ICIQ-SF, 24% of the sample experienced some kind of urinary incontinence, although it is true that most of them classified it as small amount. Patients with a positive biopsy had a lower IPSS and IIEF-5 average score. There were no differences in the prostate cancer detection rate stratified by the severity of LUTS. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing prostate biopsy have, with a high probability, LUTS. Approximately 50% suffer from some degree of erectile dysfunction and 24% had some kind of urinary leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ramírez-Backhaus
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Urología (FIVO), Valencia, España.
| | - J González-Tampán
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Urología (FIVO), Valencia, España
| | - I M Ortiz-Rodríguez
- Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad de Almería, Almería, España
| | - Á Gómez-Ferrer
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Urología (FIVO), Valencia, España
| | - J Rubio-Briones
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Urología (FIVO), Valencia, España
| | - A Collado-Serra
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Urología (FIVO), Valencia, España
| | - A Calatrava
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, FIVO, Valencia, España
| | - C Rodríguez-Torreblanca
- Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad de Almería, Almería, España
| | - E Solsona-Narbón
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Urología (FIVO), Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Casanova-Salas I, Masiá E, Armiñán A, Calatrava A, Mancarella C, Rubio-Briones J, Scotlandi K, Vicent MJ, López-Guerrero JA. MiR-187 Targets the Androgen-Regulated Gene ALDH1A3 in Prostate Cancer. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0125576. [PMID: 25969992 PMCID: PMC4430273 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
miRNAs are predicted to control the activity of approximately 60% of all protein-coding genes participating in the regulation of several cellular processes and diseases, including cancer. Recently, we have demonstrated that miR-187 is significantly downregulated in prostate cancer (PCa) and here we propose a proteomic approach to identify its potential targets. For this purpose, PC-3 cells were transiently transfected with miR-187 precursor and miRNA mimic negative control. Proteins were analyzed by a two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) and defined as differentially regulated if the observed fold change was ±1.06. Then, MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed after protein digestion and low abundance proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS. Peptides were identified by searching against the Expasy SWISS PROT database, and target validation was performed both in vitro by western blot and qRT-PCR and in clinical samples by qRT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and ELISA. DIGE analysis showed 9 differentially expressed spots (p<0.05) and 7 showed a down-regulated expression upon miR-187 re-introduction. Among these targets we identified aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 (ALDH1A3). ALDH1A3 expression was significantly downregulated in PC3, LNCaP and DU-145 cells after miR-187 re-introduction. Supporting these data, the expression of ALDH1A3 was found significantly (p<0.0001) up-regulated in PCa samples and inversely correlated (p<0.0001) with miR-187 expression, its expression being directly associated with Gleason score (p = 0.05). The expression of ALDH1A3 was measured in urine samples to evaluate the predictive capability of this biomarker for the presence of PCa and, at a signification level of 10%, PSA and also ALDH1A3 were significantly associated with a positive biopsy of PCa. In conclusion, our data illustrate for the first time the role of ALDH1A3 as a miR-187 target in PCa and provide insights in the utility of using this protein as a new biomarker for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Casanova-Salas
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Esther Masiá
- Polymer Therapeutics Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Armiñán
- Polymer Therapeutics Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Caterina Mancarella
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Katia Scotlandi
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Jesús Vicent
- Polymer Therapeutics Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fernandez-Serra A, Casanova-Salas I, Rubio L, Calatrava A, García-Flores M, García-Casado Z, López-Guerrero JA, Rubio-Briones J. [Update on the diagnosis of PCa in urine. The current role of urine markers]. ARCH ESP UROL 2015; 68:240-249. [PMID: 25948797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is still a main health issue, in fact it is responsible for 10% of cancer deaths across Europe. The morphology of the prostate gland makes urine an ideal sample, non invasive, for determination both diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. We use urinary PCA3 levels to indicate a prostate biopsy, and it is the only urinary biomarkers in PCa with FDA approval for clinical use. Many other biomarkers based on the expression of specific genes of PCa are being studied and validated, for instance the fusion gene TMPRSS2-ERG with a commercial kit available, while another approach is to test the expression of a panel of genes. An emerging focus of research, which deserves attention, is miRNAs. Other newer approaches such as epigenetics, proteomics and metabolomics also would be very useful in the future for the development and validation of new biomarkers. In this paper we review the state of the art in the field of urinary biomarkers in PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fernandez-Serra
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular.Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología.Valencia. España
| | - I Casanova-Salas
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular.Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología.Valencia. España
| | - L Rubio
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular.Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología.Valencia. España
| | - A Calatrava
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica. Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología.Valencia. España
| | - M García-Flores
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular.Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología.Valencia. España
| | - Z García-Casado
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular.Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología.Valencia. España
| | - J A López-Guerrero
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular.Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología.Valencia. España
| | - J Rubio-Briones
- Servicio de Urología de la Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología. Valencia. España
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rubio-Briones J, Iborra I, Ramírez M, Calatrava A, Collado A, Casanova J, Domínguez-Escrig J, Gómez-Ferrer A, Ricós JV, Monrós JL, Dumont R, López-Guerrero JA, Salas D, Solsona E. Obligatory information that a patient diagnosed of prostate cancer and candidate for an active surveillance protocol must know. Actas Urol Esp 2014; 38:559-65. [PMID: 24636075 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2014] [Accepted: 02/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To know the necessary information to reproduce the results found in the literature on active surveillance (AS) in prostate cancer (PCa) in our own center so that the information would be objective and correctly given to the patients. We have aimed to study the percentage of candidates for AS chosen in our setting, and the data on infrastaging, subgrading and prediction of insignificant PCa, debugging the predictive value of clinical variables to improve our selection criteria and finally to analyze the results of our patients enrolled in AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retro- and prospective review of our data bases was performed. A one-year period was analyzed to know AS candidates. Analysis of our radical prostatectomy specimens for infrastaging, subgrading and prediction of insignificant PCa (Epstein's criteria) was made as well as a uni/multivariate analysis of clinical variables in patients with insignificant PCa in the specimen. A prospective validation was performed with overall survival and survival free of active treatment (SFAT) as endpoints in patients enrolled in AS. RESULTS Between October-2010/October-2011, 44.7% of our PCa were candidates for AS, but only 11.2% choose it. The percentages found for infrastaging, subgrading and prediction of insignificant PCa were 14%, 31.4% and 55.7%, respectively. However, only just 6 patients (6.97%) had≥pT3a+Gleason≥7+volume>0.5cc PCa. The multivariate analysis showed that PSA density and number of affected cores were independent predictors of insignificant PCa. With a mean follow-up of 36±39months, 63 out of 232 patients enrolled in AS went on to active treatment (27.1%), with only 13 due to anxiety without pathologic progression. Median time of SFAT was 72.7 months (CI 95% 30.9-114.4). SFAT at 24 months was 76.4% (69.7-83.1%) and at 48 months 58.1% (48.8-67.4%). Only 10 patients died (4.3%), 9 due to causes different of PCa. Estimated overall survival at 5 years was 92.8% (CI 95% 86.7-98.9%). CONCLUSIONS It should be mandatory to have the exact knowledge of the local data of each Center in order to objectively inform patients about prostate biopsy efficiency, and if percentages of infrastaging, subgrading and prediction of insignificant PCa are in accordance with the literature. At 3 years, we reproduced the results of the longest series of AS, so we have ascertained that our AS protocol can be implemented with increasingly more patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Rubio-Briones
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España.
| | - I Iborra
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - M Ramírez
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - A Calatrava
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - A Collado
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - J Casanova
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - J Domínguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - A Gómez-Ferrer
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - J V Ricós
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - J L Monrós
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - R Dumont
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - J A López-Guerrero
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| | - D Salas
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Consellería de Sanidad, Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, España
| | - E Solsona
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Casanova-Salas I, Rubio-Briones J, Calatrava A, Mancarella C, Masiá E, Casanova J, Fernández-Serra A, Rubio L, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Armiñán A, Domínguez-Escrig J, Martínez F, García-Casado Z, Scotlandi K, Vicent MJ, López-Guerrero JA. Identification of miR-187 and miR-182 as Biomarkers of Early Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol 2014; 192:252-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Casanova-Salas
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Service of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Caterina Mancarella
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Esther Masiá
- Polymer Therapeutics Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Casanova
- Service of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Fernández-Serra
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Rubio
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Ana Armiñán
- Polymer Therapeutics Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Zaida García-Casado
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Katia Scotlandi
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - María J. Vicent
- Polymer Therapeutics Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Casanova-Salas I, Masía E, Armiñán A, Calatrava A, Mancarella C, Rubio-Briones J, Scotlandi K, Vicent M, López-Guerrero J. 680: miR-187 targets the androgen-regulated gene ALDH1A3 in prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(14)50599-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
33
|
Custodio A, Moreno-Rubio J, Aparicio J, Gallego-Plazas J, Yaya R, Maurel J, Rodríguez-Salas N, Burgos E, Ramos D, Calatrava A, Andrada E, Díaz-López E, Sánchez A, Madero R, Cejas P, Feliu J. Pharmacogenetic Predictors of Outcome in Patients with Stage II and III Colon Cancer Treated with Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther 2014; 13:2226-37. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-13-1109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
34
|
López-Guerrero JA, Casanova-Salas I, Fernández-Serra A, Rubio L, Calatrava A, García-Flores M, García-Casado Z, Rubio-Briones J. [New biomarkers to optimize the selection and follow up of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance]. ARCH ESP UROL 2014; 67:462-472. [PMID: 24914846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Identification of biomarkers that, at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), are associated with presence of disease or a more aggressive behavior will transform the clinical management of this disease. If both patients and clinicians would have reproducible and valid tools to estimate the specific risk of morbidity associated with PCa, then many patients would opt to and join active surveillance (AS) protocols, and consequently costs and comorbidities associated with the current overtreatment of prostate cancer would be reduced. Thus, a biomarker, or a panel of biomarkers, with high specificity to identify patients at risk for progression in AS protocols, would identify those men who could benefit from less intensive AS protocols with less repeated biopsies, so reducing the risk and cost of these invasive procedures. In this review we try to offer an overview of the new markers identified by genomic techniques and to discuss their potential role in an AS context. Moreover, the AS protocol offers an adequate setting for validation of biomarkers associated to disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose A López-Guerrero
- Laboratorio de Biología Molecular. Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología. Valencia. España
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Borque Á, Rubio-Briones J, Esteban LM, Sanz G, Domínguez-Escrig J, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Calatrava A, Solsona E. Implementing the use of nomograms by choosing threshold points in predictive models: 2012 updated Partin Tables vs a European predictive nomogram for organ-confined disease in prostate cancer. BJU Int 2014; 113:878-86. [PMID: 24529282 DOI: 10.1111/bju.12532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To implement the use of nomograms in clinical practice showing how to choose thresholds in nomograms' predictions to select risk groups. To validate and compare the predictive ability and clinical utility of the Hospital Universitario 'Miguel Servet' (HUMS) and the updated Partin Tables 2012 (PT-2012) nomograms to predict organ-confined disease (OCD) after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Cohort of 1285 patients with prostate cancer treated with RP at Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO) between 1986 and 2011. The predictive value of the nomograms was assessed by means of calibration curves, discrimination ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and probability density functions). The clinical utility was evaluated through Vickers' decision curves and thresholds were chosen through probability density functions. RESULTS The calibration curves showed a minimal underestimation in low probabilities (<20%), a minimal overestimation in high probabilities (>50%) in the HUMS nomogram and a regular minimal overestimation in the PT-2012. Their AUC of 0.7285 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7010-0.7559) and 0.7288 (95%CI 0.7013-0.7562) respectively, show an adequate discrimination ability for both predictive models in the IVO cohort. The decision curves show similar net benefits for both models. In this study we advocate for a threshold of 53% for the identification of OCD. CONCLUSIONS The HUMS-nomogram and the PT-2012 predictions of OCD confirm their utility in a contemporary cohort of patients. Patients with a probability of OCD >53% should be classified as OCD, helping physicians to better counsel their patients. A selection of adequate thresholds, as presented in this paper, makes nomograms more accessible tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángel Borque
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 'Miguel Servet', Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Custodio A, Moreno-Rubio J, Aparicio J, Gallego-Plazas J, Yaya R, Maurel J, Higuera O, Burgos E, Ramos D, Calatrava A, Andrada E, López R, Moreno V, Madero R, Cejas P, Feliu J. Pharmacogenetic predictors of severe peripheral neuropathy in colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a GEMCAD group study. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:398-403. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
37
|
Casanova-Salas I, Rubio-Briones J, Fernandez-Serra A, Calatrava A, Casanova J, Rubio-Martinez L, Garcia-Casado Z, Dominguez J, Ramirez M, Lopez-Guerrero J. 819 MiRNA Profiling in the Screening of Potential Biomarkers for PCa Diagnosis and Prognosis. Eur J Cancer 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(12)71452-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
38
|
Machado I, Santos J, Calatrava A, Cruz J, Martínez F, Maia de Alcántara F, Barrasa A, Yaya R, Fernandez-Martos C, Mengual JL, Estevan R. [Hepatic cyst in a patient with anorectal cloacogenic carcinoma: metastasis or benign liver disease?]. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 35:52-3. [PMID: 22177268 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2011.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2011] [Accepted: 09/10/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
39
|
Rubio-Briones J, Calatrava A, Fernández-Serra A, Ramos Ruiz R, Iborra I, García-Casado Z, Rubio L, Trassierra M, Collado A, Casanova J, Gómez-Ferrer A, Solsona E, López-Guerrero J. Expresión inmunohistoquímica de la densidad microvascular y de la anhidrasa carbónica IX en carcinoma renal: Relación con el tipo histológico y con la progresión tumoral. Actas Urol Esp 2011. [DOI: 10.4321/s0210-48062011000200004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
40
|
Hörndler C, Gallego R, García-Albeniz X, Alonso-Espinaco V, Alonso V, Escudero P, Jimeno M, Ortego J, Codony-Servat J, Fernández-Martos C, Calatrava A, Marín-Aguilera M, Muñoz J, Castellví-Bel S, Castells A, Rubini M, Gascón P, Maurel J. Co-expression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) and phosphorylated insulin growth factor receptor I (pIGF-1R) correlates with poor prognosis in patients with wild-type KRAS treated with cetuximab or panitumumab: a GEMCAD study. Cancer Biol Ther 2011; 11:177-83. [PMID: 21099348 DOI: 10.4161/cbt.11.2.13839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND By transactivacion, phosphorylated insulin growth factor receptor I (IGF-1R) can activate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). MMP-7, produced by colorectal cancer cells, also can activate IGF-1R by degrading IGFBP-3 and releasing IGF-I. METHODS A cohort of patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), under second- or third-line treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab, was tested using immunohistochemistry for expression of the activated form of IGF-1R (p-IGF-1R) and MMP-7. KRAS and BRAF mutation status was determined by sequencing and allelic discrimination analysis, respectively. Analyses were performed in primary CRC tumor samples or metastases, and the association of immunohistochemistry findings, mutational results, and treatment outcomes was investigated in both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Expression of activated IGF-1R and MMP-7 was observed in 51 and 49% of pts, respectively. Co-expression of MMP-7 and pIGF-1R (double positivity, DP) was observed in 28 pts (25%). There was no association between KRAS or BRAF mutational status and DP (p=0.52). Pts with DP responded more poorly to first-line chemotherapy (p=0.005) and to anti-EGFR treatment (p=0.01) than non-DP pts. In wild type (WT) KRAS pts, those with DP have poorer PFS (2.7 months vs. 3.5m, p=0.036; HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.05-3.75) and OS (6.4 months vs. 8.6 m, p=0.010; HR 2.33, 95%CI 1.23-4.43) in the adjusted multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that concomitant expression of MMP-7 and activation of p-IGF-1R (DP) correlates with poor prognosis in WT KRAS pts treated with anti-EGFR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Hörndler
- Pathology Department, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rubio-Briones J, Fernández-Serra A, Calatrava A, García-Casado Z, Rubio L, Bonillo MA, Iborra I, Solsona E, López-Guerrero JA. Clinical implications of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion expression in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010; 183:2054-61. [PMID: 20303538 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2009] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular prognostic factors may be useful tools for prostate cancer that complement classic clinicopathological factors. Genetic rearrangements between TMPRSS2 and ETS have been described for prostate cancer but their clinical significance is still unclear. We analyzed the association of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene with prostate cancer outcome in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed prostate cancer samples from 226 patients treated with radical prostatectomy from 1996 to 2002 with a median followup of 84 months (range 9 to 153). TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene expression was determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Clinicopathological and molecular variables were related to biochemical and clinical progression-free survival by the Kaplan-Meier proportional risk log rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model using stepwise selection was used to identify independent predictors of poor outcome. RESULTS TMPRSS2-ERG fusion was detected in 114 cases (50.4%). We noted no association between fusion gene status and prostate cancer clinicopathological characteristics. However, when patients were grouped by TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene status, different clinicopathological prognostic factors defined each group for biochemical and clinical progression-free survival. Prostate specific antigen, specimen Gleason score and margin status were independent prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer expressing the fusion gene. In the nonexpressing TMPRSS2-ERG group the prognostic factors were cT, Gleason score and margins. CONCLUSIONS TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene status classifies patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy into groups defined by different prognostic factors. This could be the basis for designing more refined treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Garcia-Casado Z, Guerrero-Zotano A, Llombart-Cussac A, Calatrava A, Fernandez-Serra A, Ruiz-Simon A, Gavila J, Climent MA, Almenar S, Cervera-Deval J, Campos J, Albaladejo CV, Llombart-Bosch A, Guillem V, Lopez-Guerrero JA. A polymorphism at the 3'-UTR region of the aromatase gene defines a subgroup of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with poor response to neoadjuvant letrozole. BMC Cancer 2010; 10:36. [PMID: 20144226 PMCID: PMC2830181 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2009] [Accepted: 02/09/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aromatase (CYP19A1) regulates estrogen biosynthesis. Polymorphisms in CYP19A1 have been related to the pathogenesis of breast cancer (BC). Inhibition of aromatase with letrozole constitutes the best option for treating estrogen-dependent BC in postmenopausal women. We evaluate a series of polymorphisms of CYP19A1 and their effect on response to neoadjuvant letrozole in early BC. METHODS We analyzed 95 consecutive postmenopausal women with stage II-III ER/PgR [+] BC treated with neoadjuvant letrozole. Response to treatment was measured by radiology at 4th month by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Three polymorphisms of CYP19A1, one in exon 7 (rs700519) and two in the 3'-UTR region (rs10046 and rs4646) were evaluated on DNA obtained from peripheral blood. RESULTS Thirty-five women (36.8%) achieved a radiological response to letrozole. The histopathological and immunohistochemical parameters, including hormonal receptor status, were not associated with the response to letrozole. Only the genetic variants (AC/AA) of the rs4646 polymorphism were associated with poor response to letrozole (p = 0.03). Eighteen patients (18.9%) reported a progression of the disease. Those patients carrying the genetic variants (AC/AA) of rs4646 presented a lower progression-free survival than the patients homozygous for the reference variant (p = 0.0686). This effect was especially significant in the group of elderly patients not operated after letrozole induction (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Our study reveals that the rs4646 polymorphism identifies a subgroup of stage II-III ER/PgR [+] BC patients with poor response to neoadjuvant letrozole and poor prognosis. Testing for the rs4646 polymorphism could be a useful tool in order to orientate the treatment in elderly BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaida Garcia-Casado
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Solsona E, Climent MA, Iborra I, Collado A, Rubio J, Ricós JV, Casanova J, Calatrava A, Monrós JL. Bladder preservation in selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer by complete transurethral resection of the bladder plus systemic chemotherapy: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 nonrandomized comparative trial with radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 55:911-9. [PMID: 18722046 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2008] [Accepted: 08/06/2008] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many phase 2 bladder-sparing programmes using transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) plus chemotherapy or radio-chemotherapy have been undertaken, but some controversies remain. OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of complete TURB plus three cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A phase 2 nonrandomized trial was designed that included patients with MIBC who underwent complete TURB with positive biopsies of the tumour bed. Patients with negative biopsies of the tumour bed, with macroscopically residual tumour, with hydronephrosis, or with distant metastasis were excluded from this trial. Patients included in this trial were offered three cycles of systemic chemotherapy or radical cystectomy (RC). Clinical response (cR) was denoted by either no tumour or the presence of Ta1-Tis bladder tumour at 3-mo evaluation; clinical non-response (cNR) was denoted by cases of muscle-invasive tumour or distant metastasis. Of 146 patients who entered this trial, 75 choose the bladder-sparing programme and 71 chose RC. MEASUREMENTS At 5 yr and 10 yr, the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 64.5% and 59.8%, respectively, with no significant difference compared to the RC arm (p=0.544). The progression-free survival with bladder preserved was 52.6% and 34.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, cR was the only predictive factor for survival (p=0.001) and bladder preservation (p=0.000). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS This was not a randomized trial, and patients were included over 16 yr. However, no modifications were made to the therapy schedule except from chemotherapy schemes considered standard at the time. CONCLUSIONS Patients with microscopic residual cancer after complete TURB seem to be good candidates for the bladder-sparing programme using three cycles of systemic chemotherapy, with CSS comparable to RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Solsona
- Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nagore E, Monteagudo C, Pinazo MI, Botella-Estrada R, Oliver V, Bañuls J, Moragón M, Valcuende F, Calatrava A, Mayol-Belda MJ, Lázaro R, Niveiro M, Guillén C. [Protocol proposal for the histological report of the primary tumor in patients with cutaneous melanoma from the Task Force for Cutaneous Melanoma of the Valencian Community]. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007; 98:459-65. [PMID: 17669299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
This text compiles a histological protocol proposal for cutaneous melanoma agreed by the Task Force for Cutaneous Melanoma of the Valencian Community. It brings together the protocol itself and, in addition, includes a description of each of the proposed variables that has shown to have a greater prognostic impact in previous works.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Nagore
- Servicio de Dermatología, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, España.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nagore E, Monteagudo C, Pinazo M, Botella-Estrada R, Oliver V, Bañuls J, Moragón M, Valcuende F, Calatrava A, Mayol-Belda M, Lázaro R, Niveiro M, Guillén C. Propuesta de protocolo para el informe histológico del tumor primario de los pacientes con un melanoma cutáneo del Grupo de Trabajo para el Melanoma Cutáneo de la Comunidad Valenciana. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s0001-7310(07)70108-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
46
|
Ruiz N, Fernandez-Martos C, Romero I, Pla A, Maiquez J, Calatrava A, Guillem V. Invasive Fungal Infection and Nasal Septum Perforation With Bevacizumab-Based Therapy in Advanced Colon Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:3376-7. [PMID: 17664487 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.12.0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Ruiz
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lopez-Guerrero JA, Garcia-Casado Z, Guerrero-Zotano AL, Calatrava A, Ruiz-Sauri A, Fernandez-Serra A, Ruiz A, Llombart-Bosch A, Guillem-Porta V, Llombart-Cussac A. Corroboration of polymorphisms in the aromatase (CYP19A1) gene with response to neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole in postmenopausal women with stages II-II ER/PgR-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
602 Background: Aromatase (CYP19A1) is the main enzyme implicated in estrogen biosynthesis. Polymorphisms in CYP19A1 can affect both aromatase expression and activity leading to changes in the estrogen levels. These changes have been previously associated with pathogenesis of estrogen-dependent diseases, including breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the genotype of CYP19A1 can have an effect on the response to endocrine therapy with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole (L). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a series of 58 postmenopausal women with stage II-III ER/PgR[+] breast cancer treated with L as neoadjuvant therapy. Response was evaluated by radiology (mammogram or ultrasound) at four months L (OMS) and data was available in 56 cases. A total of ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning the gene, a TCT insertion/deletion and a (TTTA)n repeat were evaluated. The (TTTA)n repeat was analyzed by using GeneScan to detect polymorphism length, TCT Ins/Del by direct sequencing and SNPs by allelic discrimination using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems). Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the most accurate predictive model for response to therapy. Results: Median age of our series was 77 years (range: 68 to 90). Twenty women (36%) responded to 4 months L, while 38 (67%) did not (2 PD and 36 EE). Allelic frequencies were determined for each polymorphism and the global genotype data was evaluated in a logistic regression analysis. In a first step, the analysis with the genetic information for the 12 polymorphisms resulted in a model that predicted radiological response to L with an accuracy of 80% (85% specifity, 69% sensibility). However, a reduction to 4 informative polymorphisms generated a simpler predictive model with an accuracy of 76% (76.5% specifity, 75% sensibility). Conclusions: Polymorphism analysis of CYP19A1 could predict for response to neoadjuvant therapy with L. A validation of this predictive model in an independent series is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. A. Lopez-Guerrero
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Z. Garcia-Casado
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - A. L. Guerrero-Zotano
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - A. Calatrava
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - A. Ruiz-Sauri
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - A. Fernandez-Serra
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - A. Ruiz
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - A. Llombart-Bosch
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - V. Guillem-Porta
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - A. Llombart-Cussac
- Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain; University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Arnau de Villanova, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Alfaro-Rubio A, Botella-Estrada R, Calatrava A, Requena C, Serra-Guillén C, Hueso L, Martorell A, Sanmartín O, Nagore E, Llombart B, Guillén C. [Benign epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma]. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007; 98:136-8. [PMID: 17397605 DOI: 10.1016/s0001-7310(07)70036-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
49
|
Nagore E, Monteagudo C, Pinazo M, Botella-Estrada R, Oliver V, Bañuls J, Moragón M, Valcuende F, Calatrava A, Mayol-Belda M, Lázaro R, Niveiro M, Guillén C. Protocol Proposal for the Histological Report of the Primary Tumor in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma From the Task Force for Cutaneous Melanoma of the Valencian Community. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition) 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s1578-2190(07)70488-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
50
|
Alfaro-Rubio A, Botella-Estrada R, Calatrava A, Requena C, Serra-Guillén C, Hueso L, Martorell A, Sanmartín O, Nagore E, Llombart B, Guillén C. Benign Epitheliod Fibrous Histiocytoma. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition) 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s1578-2190(07)70416-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|