1
|
Lahaye MJ, Lambregts DMJ, Aalbers AGJ, Snaebjornsson P, Beets-Tan RGH, Kok NFM. Imaging in the era of risk-adapted treatment in Colon cancer. Br J Radiol 2024:tqae061. [PMID: 38648743 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment landscape for patients with colon cancer is continuously evolving. Risk-adapted treatment strategies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy, are slowly finding their way into clinical practice and guidelines. Radiologists are pivotal in guiding clinicians toward the most optimal treatment for each colon cancer patient. This review provides an overview of recent and upcoming advances in the diagnostic management of colon cancer and the radiologist's role in the multidisciplinary approach to treating colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max J Lahaye
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Niels F M Kok
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rijsemus CJV, Kok NFM, Aalbers AGJ, Grotenhuis BA, Berardi E, Snaebjornsson P, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Lahaye MJ. Investigating locations of recurrences with MRI after CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Eur J Radiol 2024; 175:111478. [PMID: 38677041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are at high risk of recurrent disease. Understanding where and why recurrences occur is the first step in finding solutions to reduce recurrence rates. Although diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI is not routinely used in the follow-up of CRC patients, it has a clear advantage over CT in detecting the location and spread of (recurrent) PM. This study aimed to identify common locations of recurrence in CRC patients after CRS-HIPEC with MRI. METHOD This was a single-centre retrospective study of patients with recurrent PM after CRS-HIPEC performed between January 2016 and August 2020. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had both an MRI preoperatively (MRI1) and at the time of recurrent disease (MRI2). Two abdominal radiologists reviewed in consensus and categorized recurrences according to their location on MRI2 and in correlation with previous disease location on prior imaging (MRI1) and the surgical report of the CRS-HIPEC. RESULTS Thirty patients were included, with a median surgical PCI of 7 (range 3-21) at the time of primary CRS-HIPEC. In total, 68 recurrent metastases were detected on MRI2, of which 14 were extra-peritoneal. Of the remaining 54 PM, 42 (78%) occurred where the peritoneum was damaged due to earlier resections or other surgical procedures (e.g. inserted surgical abdominal drains). Most recurrent metastases were found in the mesentery, lower abdomen/pelvis and abdominal wall (87%). CONCLUSIONS Most recurrent PMs appeared in the mesentery, lower abdomen/pelvis and abdominal wall, especially where the peritoneum was previously damaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J V Rijsemus
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology - University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B A Grotenhuis
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Berardi
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine - University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology - University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El Khababi N, Beets-Tan RGH, Tissier R, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Curvo-Semedo L, Dresen RC, van Griethuysen JJM, Nougaret S, Beets GL, van Triest B, Taylor SA, Lambregts DMJ. Outcomes and potential impact of a virtual hands-on training program on MRI staging confidence and performance in rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:1746-1754. [PMID: 37646807 PMCID: PMC10873460 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10167-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the potential impact of a dedicated virtual training course on MRI staging confidence and performance in rectal cancer. METHODS Forty-two radiologists completed a stepwise virtual training course on rectal cancer MRI staging composed of a pre-course (baseline) test with 7 test cases (5 staging, 2 restaging), a 1-day online workshop, 1 month of individual case readings (n = 70 cases with online feedback), a live online feedback session supervised by two expert faculty members, and a post-course test. The ESGAR structured reporting templates for (re)staging were used throughout the course. Results of the pre-course and post-course test were compared in terms of group interobserver agreement (Krippendorf's alpha), staging confidence (perceived staging difficulty), and diagnostic accuracy (using an expert reference standard). RESULTS Though results were largely not statistically significant, the majority of staging variables showed a mild increase in diagnostic accuracy after the course, ranging between + 2% and + 17%. A similar trend was observed for IOA which improved for nearly all variables when comparing the pre- and post-course. There was a significant decrease in the perceived difficulty level (p = 0.03), indicating an improved diagnostic confidence after completion of the course. CONCLUSIONS Though exploratory in nature, our study results suggest that use of a dedicated virtual training course and web platform has potential to enhance staging performance, confidence, and interobserver agreement to assess rectal cancer on MRI virtual training and could thus be a good alternative (or addition) to in-person training. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Rectal cancer MRI reporting quality is highly dependent on radiologists' expertise, stressing the need for dedicated training/teaching. This study shows promising results for a virtual web-based training program, which could be a good alternative (or addition) to in-person training. KEY POINTS • Rectal cancer MRI reporting quality is highly dependent on radiologists' expertise, stressing the need for dedicated training and teaching. • Using a dedicated virtual training course and web-based platform, encouraging first results were achieved to improve staging accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and interobserver agreement. • These exploratory results suggest that virtual training could thus be a good alternative (or addition) to in-person training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Biostatistics Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luís Curvo-Semedo
- Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar E Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Raphaëla C Dresen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Medical Imaging Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (U1194), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for oncology and reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Willemse JRJ, Lahaye MJ, Kok NFM, Grotenhuis BA, Aalbers AGJ, Beets GL, Rijsemus C, Maas M, van Golen LW, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and CT in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:290-299. [PMID: 38145899 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to explore how findings of whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DW-MRI) compared to the routine diagnostic workup with CT and/or 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD This was an exploratory retrospective analysis of 55 patients with a clinical suspicion of recurrent CRC who underwent DW-MRI following CT and/or FDG-PET/CT. Two readers in consensus interpreted all clinical imaging reports and converted each described lesion into a confidence score (1 = definitely benign to 5 = definitely malignant). DW-MRI findings were compared to the most recent previous CT or PET/CT. Any discrepant or additional DW-MRI findings were documented and compared with histology and/or clinical follow-up (if available). RESULTS Whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DW-MRI) resulted in discrepant/additional findings in 26/55 (47%) cases; 23/37 (62%) compared to previous CT and 3/18 (17%) compared to previous PET/CT. These included 10 cases where DW-MRI converted previously inconclusive CT (n = 8) or PET/CT (n = 2) findings into a conclusive diagnosis, one where it contradicted a previous CT diagnosis of recurrence, five where DW-MRI diagnosed recurrent disease not previously reported on CT and 10 cases where DW-MRI detected additional lesions compared to CT (n = 9) or PET/CT (n = 1). Eighty-eight per cent of cases with discrepant/additional findings concerned patients with recurrent/metachronous peritoneal metastases. In total, DW-MRI resulted in 42 discrepant/additional lesions; the DW-MRI diagnosis was correct in 76% of these lesions and incorrect (false positive) in 7%. In the remaining 17%, no standard of reference was available. CONCLUSIONS This explorative study suggests that DW-MRI may be of added value to patients with a clinical suspicion for recurrent CRC, in particular to identify patients with peritoneal metastases. DW-MRI mainly has potential as a 'problem-solver' in patients with inconclusive or negative findings on previous imaging (in particular CT) and to detect additional disease sites in patients already diagnosed with recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen R J Willemse
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brechtje A Grotenhuis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Rijsemus
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Larissa W van Golen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schurink NW, van Kranen SR, van Griethuysen JJM, Roberti S, Snaebjornsson P, Bakers FCH, de Bie SH, Bosma GPT, Cappendijk VC, Geenen RWF, Neijenhuis PA, Peterson GM, Veeken CJ, Vliegen RFA, Peters FP, Bogveradze N, El Khababi N, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. Development and multicenter validation of a multiparametric imaging model to predict treatment response in rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:8889-8898. [PMID: 37452176 PMCID: PMC10667134 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09920-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate a multiparametric model to predict neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer at baseline using a heterogeneous multicenter MRI dataset. METHODS Baseline staging MRIs (T2W (T2-weighted)-MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) / apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)) of 509 patients (9 centres) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were collected. Response was defined as (1) complete versus incomplete response, or (2) good (Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) 1-2) versus poor response (TRG3-5). Prediction models were developed using combinations of the following variable groups: (1) Non-imaging: age/sex/tumor-location/tumor-morphology/CRT-surgery interval (2) Basic staging: cT-stage/cN-stage/mesorectal fascia involvement, derived from (2a) original staging reports, or (2b) expert re-evaluation (3) Advanced staging: variables from 2b combined with cTN-substaging/invasion depth/extramural vascular invasion/tumor length (4) Quantitative imaging: tumour volume + first-order histogram features (from T2W-MRI and DWI/ADC) Models were developed with data from 6 centers (n = 412) using logistic regression with the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operator (LASSO) feature selection, internally validated using repeated (n = 100) random hold-out validation, and externally validated using data from 3 centers (n = 97). RESULTS After external validation, the best model (including non-imaging and advanced staging variables) achieved an area under the curve of 0.60 (95%CI=0.48-0.72) to predict complete response and 0.65 (95%CI=0.53-0.76) to predict a good response. Quantitative variables did not improve model performance. Basic staging variables consistently achieved lower performance compared to advanced staging variables. CONCLUSIONS Overall model performance was moderate. Best results were obtained using advanced staging variables, highlighting the importance of good-quality staging according to current guidelines. Quantitative imaging features had no added value (in this heterogeneous dataset). CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Predicting tumour response at baseline could aid in tailoring neoadjuvant therapies for rectal cancer. This study shows that image-based prediction models are promising, though are negatively affected by variations in staging quality and MRI acquisition, urging the need for harmonization. KEY POINTS This multicenter study combining clinical information and features derived from MRI rendered disappointing performance to predict response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Best results were obtained with the combination of clinical baseline information and state-of-the-art image-based staging variables, highlighting the importance of good quality staging according to current guidelines and staging templates. No added value was found for quantitative imaging features in this multicenter retrospective study. This is likely related to acquisition variations, which is a major problem for feature reproducibility and thus model generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels W Schurink
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon R van Kranen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Roberti
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans C H Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Shira H de Bie
- Department of Radiology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Schalkhaar, The Netherlands
| | - Gerlof P T Bosma
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent C Cappendijk
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Remy W F Geenen
- Department of Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Cornelis J Veeken
- Department of Radiology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Roy F A Vliegen
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Femke P Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nino Bogveradze
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Acad. F. Todua Medical Center, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shkurti J, van den Berg K, van Erning FN, Lahaye MJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Nederend J. Diagnostic accuracy of CT for local staging of colon cancer: A nationwide study in the Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113314. [PMID: 37729742 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based staging in selecting high-risk colon cancer patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy while avoiding overtreatment. METHODS Data of adult patients diagnosed with non-metastatic primary colon cancer in 2005-2020, who underwent surgical resection without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were retrospectively collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Agreement between clinical and pathological evaluation for each T and N stage was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were conducted to predict T3-T4 and N1-N2 stages, with histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS Data from 44,471 patients (median age, 71 years, 50% female) were evaluated. We included 38,915 patients with complete T stage and 39,565 patients with complete N stage for analyses. The overall clinical-pathological agreement for T stage was 59% and for N stage 57%. The sensitivity and specificity of CT to detect T3-T4 tumours were 80% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79, 0.80) and 76% (95% CI: 0.75, 0.77), respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% (95% CI: 0.92, 0.92). The sensitivity and specificity of CT to detect N1-N2 category were 62% (95% CI: 0.61, 0.63) and 70% (95% CI: 0.69, 0.71), respectively, with PPV 60% (95% CI: 0.59, 0.60). CONCLUSION CT-based staging shows limited accuracy in selecting colon cancer patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant therapy without risking overtreatment. Detection of lymph node metastases with CT remains unreliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jona Shkurti
- Department of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Kim van den Berg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Diagnostic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløwsvej 19,3, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
el Khababi N, Beets-Tan RG, Curvo-Semedo L, Tissier R, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Lambregts DM. Pearls and pitfalls of structured staging and reporting of rectal cancer on MRI: an international multireader study. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230091. [PMID: 38696592 PMCID: PMC10546463 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate uniformity and pitfalls in structured radiological staging of rectal cancer. METHODS Twenty-one radiologists (12 countries) staged 75 rectal cancers on MRI using a structured reporting template. Interobserver agreement (IOA) was calculated as the percentage agreement between readers (categorical variables) and Krippendorff's α (continuous variables). Agreement with an expert consensus served as a surrogate standard of reference to estimate diagnostic accuracy. Polychoric correlation coefficients were used to assess correlations between diagnostic confidence and accuracy (=agreement with expert consensus). RESULTS Uniformity to diagnose high-risk (≥cT3 ab) versus low-risk (≤cT3 cd) cT-stage, cN0 versus cN+, lateral nodes and tumour deposits, MRF and sphincter involvement, and solid versus mucinous tumours was high with IOA > 80% in the majority of cases (and >80% agreement with expert consensus). Results for assessing extramural vascular invasion, cT-stage (cT1-2/cT3/cT4a/cT4b), cN-stage (cN0/N1/N2), relation to the peritoneal reflection, extent of sphincter involvement (internal/intersphincteric/external) and morphology (solid/annular/semi-annular) were considerably poorer. IOA was high (α = 0.72-0.84) for tumour height/length and extramural invasion depth, but low for tumour-MRF distance and number of (suspicious) nodes (α = 0.05-0.55). There was a significant positive correlation between diagnostic confidence and accuracy (=agreement with expert consensus) (p < 0.001-p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS - Several staging items lacked sufficient reproducibility.- Results for cT- and N-staging g improved when using a dichotomized stratification.- Considering the significant correlation between diagnostic confidence and accuracy, a confidence level may be incorporated into structured reporting for specific items with low reproducibility. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Although structured reporting aims to achieve uniformity in reporting, several items lack sufficient reproducibility and might benefit from dichotomized assessment and incorporating confidence levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luís Curvo-Semedo
- Department of Medical Imaging, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra EPE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Biostatistics Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
El Khababi N, Beets-Tan RGH, Tissier R, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Curvo-Semedo L, Dresen RC, Nougaret S, Beets GL, Lambregts DMJ. Predicting response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer via visual morphologic assessment and staging on baseline MRI: a multicenter and multireader study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3039-3049. [PMID: 37358604 PMCID: PMC10480283 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03961-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pre-treatment knowledge of the anticipated response of rectal tumors to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could help to further optimize the treatment. Van Griethuysen et al. proposed a visual 5-point confidence score to predict the likelihood of response on baseline MRI. Aim was to evaluate this score in a multicenter and multireader study setting and compare it to two simplified (4-point and 2-point) adaptations in terms of diagnostic performance, interobserver agreement (IOA), and reader preference. METHODS Twenty-two radiologists from 14 countries (5 MRI-experts,17 general/abdominal radiologists) retrospectively reviewed 90 baseline MRIs to estimate if patients would likely achieve a (near-)complete response (nCR); first using the 5-point score by van Griethuysen (1=highly unlikely to 5=highly likely to achieve nCR), second using a 4-point adaptation (with 1-point each for high-risk T-stage, obvious mesorectal fascia invasion, nodal involvement, and extramural vascular invasion), and third using a 2-point score (unlikely/likely to achieve nCR). Diagnostic performance was calculated using ROC curves and IOA using Krippendorf's alpha (α). RESULTS Areas under the ROC curve to predict the likelihood of a nCR were similar for the three methods (0.71-0.74). IOA was higher for the 5- and 4-point scores (α=0.55 and 0.57 versus 0.46 for the 2-point score) with best results for the MRI-experts (α=0.64-0.65). Most readers (55%) favored the 4-point score. CONCLUSIONS Visual morphologic assessment and staging methods can predict neoadjuvant treatment response with moderate-good performance. Compared to a previously published confidence-based scoring system, study readers preferred a simplified 4-point risk score based on high-risk T-stage, MRF involvement, nodal involvement, and EMVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Biostatistics Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luís Curvo-Semedo
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Raphaëla C Dresen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Medical Imaging Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (U1194), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
El Khababi N, Beets-Tan RGH, Tissier R, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Curvo-Semedo L, Dresen RC, Nougaret S, Beets GL, Lambregts DMJ. Sense and nonsense of yT-staging on MRI after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:1878-1887. [PMID: 37545140 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this work was to investigate the value of rectal cancer T-staging on MRI after chemoradiotherapy (ymrT-staging) in relation to the degree of fibrotic transformation of the tumour bed as assessed using the pathological tumour regression grade (pTRG) of Mandard as a standard of reference. METHOD Twenty two radiologists, including five rectal MRI experts and 17 'nonexperts' (general/abdominal radiologists), evaluated the ymrT stage on the restaging MRIs of 90 rectal cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy. The ymrT stage was compared with the final ypT stage at histopathology; the percentages of correct staging (ymrT = ypT), understaging (ymrT < ypT) and overstaging (ymrT > ypT) were calculated and compared between patients with predominant tumour at histopathology (pTRG4-5) and patients with predominant fibrosis (pTRG1-3). Interobserver agreement (IOA) was computed using Krippendorff's alpha. RESULTS Average ymrT/ypT stage concordance was 48% for the experts and 43% for the nonexperts; ymrT/ypT stage concordance was significantly higher in the pTRG4-5 subgroup (58% vs. 41% for the pTRG1-3 group; p = 0.01), with the best results for the MRI experts. Overstaging was the main source of error, especially in the pTRG1-3 subgroup (average overstaging rate 38%-44% vs. 13%-55% in the pTRG4-5 subgroup). IOA was higher for the expert versus nonexpert readers (α = 0.67 vs. α = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS ymrT-staging is moderately accurate; accuracy is higher in poorly responding patients with predominant tumour but low in good responders with predominant fibrosis, resulting in significant overstaging. Radiologists should shift their focus from ymrT-staging to detecting gross residual (and progressive) disease, and identifying potential candidates for organ preservation who would benefit from further clinical and endoscopic evaluation to guide final treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Biostatistics Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luís Curvo-Semedo
- Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Raphaëla C Dresen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Medical Imaging Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (U1194), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Kooten JP, de Gooijer CJ, von der Thüsen JH, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Albers AGJ, Lahaye MJ, Monkhorst K, Burgers JA, Aerts JGJV, Verhoef C, Madsen EVE. Impact of centralization of care for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A historical cohort study from the Dutch mesothelioma expert centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:611-618. [PMID: 36610896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive cancer that has a poor prognosis. An earlier population-based study found that the majority of Dutch patients do not receive anti-cancer treatment. In 2015, Dutch Malignant Mesothelioma care was centralized in two expert centers. We reviewed treatment patterns at these centers, to assess the impact of centralization of MPM care in the Netherlands. METHODS Data from all patients referred to the Dutch MPM expert centers from 2014 to 2020, were retrospectively collected. Descriptive statistics regarding referrals, patient and tumor characteristics, and treatment patterns were provided. Population-based incidence rates were provided by the Netherlands Cancer Registry. RESULTS From 2014 to 2020, 78 patients were referred to the Dutch Mesothelioma expert centers, of whom 32 were female (41%). From 2014 to 2017, 27 patients were referred, whereas 51 patients were referred from 2018 to 2020. This represents about 24% and 61% of the estimated population incidence, respectively. Treatment patterns were comparable between both periods. Between 2014 and 2018, 33% of patients underwent surgery, 44% systemic therapy, and 22% received best supportive care (BSC), while this was 29%, 37%, and 33% respectively from 2018 to 2020. CONCLUSION Centralization of care for patients with MPM resulted in an increase of annual referrals to the Dutch mesothelioma expert centers. While population-based incidence did not change during the study period, the absolute number of patients receiving treatment at our centers did increase. This might be considered a first important step towards better treatment for patients with this fatal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Job P van Kooten
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Cornedine J de Gooijer
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandra R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Albers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bogveradze N, Maas M, El Khababi N, Schurink NW, Lahaye MJ, Bakers FC, Tanis PJ, Kusters M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM. Pelvic CT in addition to MRI to differentiate between rectal and sigmoid cancer on imaging using the sigmoid take-off as a landmark. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:467-472. [PMID: 35404168 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221091209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sigmoid take-off (STO) is a recently established landmark to discern rectal from sigmoid cancer on imaging. STO-assessment can be challenging on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to varying axial planes. PURPOSE To establish the benefit of using computed tomography (CT; with consistent axial planes), in addition to MRI, to anatomically classify rectal versus sigmoid cancer using the STO. MATERIAL AND METHODS A senior and junior radiologist retrospectively classified 40 patients with rectal/rectosigmoid cancers using the STO, first on MRI-only (sagittal and oblique-axial views) and then using a combination of MRI and axial CT. Tumors were classified as rectal/rectosigmoid/sigmoid (according to published STO definitions) and then dichotomized into rectal versus sigmoid. Diagnostic confidence was documented using a 5-point scale. RESULTS Adding CT resulted in a change in anatomical tumor classification in 4/40 cases (10%) for the junior reader and in 6/40 cases (15%) for the senior reader. Diagnostic confidence increased significantly after adding CT for the junior reader (mean score 3.85 vs. 4.27; P < 0.001); confidence of the senior reader was not affected (4.28 vs. 4.25; P = 0.80). Inter-observer agreement was similarly good for MRI only (κ=0.77) and MRI + CT (κ=0.76). Readers reached consensus on the classification of rectal versus sigmoid cancer in 78%-85% of cases. CONCLUSION Availability of a consistent axial imaging plane - in the case of this study provided by CT - in addition to a standard MRI protocol with sagittal and oblique-axial imaging views can be helpful to more confidently localize tumors using the STO as a landmark, especially for more junior readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nino Bogveradze
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, 5211University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, 5211University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels W Schurink
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, 5211University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Ch Bakers
- Department of Radiology, 199236Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, 6993Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, 1209University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, 5211University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina Gh Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, 5211University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Doenja Mj Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bogveradze N, Snaebjornsson P, Grotenhuis BA, van Triest B, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. MRI anatomy of the rectum: key concepts important for rectal cancer staging and treatment planning. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:13. [PMID: 36652149 PMCID: PMC9849549 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01348-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
A good understanding of the MRI anatomy of the rectum and its surroundings is pivotal to ensure high-quality diagnostic evaluation and reporting of rectal cancer. With this pictorial review, we aim to provide an image-based overview of key anatomical concepts essential for treatment planning, response evaluation and post-operative assessment. These concepts include the cross-sectional anatomy of the rectal wall in relation to T-staging; differences in staging and treatment between anal and rectal cancer; landmarks used to define the upper and lower boundaries of the rectum; the anatomy of the pelvic floor and anal canal, the mesorectal fascia, peritoneum and peritoneal reflection; and guides to help discern different pelvic lymph node stations on MRI to properly stage regional and non-regional rectal lymph node metastases. Finally, this review will highlight key aspects of post-treatment anatomy, including the assessment of radiation-induced changes and the evaluation of the post-operative pelvis after different surgical resection and reconstruction techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nino Bogveradze
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,Department of Radiology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brechtje A. Grotenhuis
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J. Lahaye
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L. Beets
- grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Doenja M. J. Lambregts
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
El Khababi N, Beets-Tan RGH, Tissier R, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Curvo-Semedo L, Dresen RC, Nougaret S, Beets GL, Lambregts DMJ. Comparison of MRI response evaluation methods in rectal cancer: a multicentre and multireader validation study. Eur Radiol 2022; 33:4367-4377. [PMID: 36576549 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09342-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare four previously published methods for rectal tumor response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy on MRI. METHODS Twenty-two radiologists (5 rectal MRI experts, 17 general/abdominal radiologists) retrospectively reviewed the post-chemoradiotherapy MRIs of 90 patients, scanned at 10 centers (with non-standardized protocols). They applied four response methods; two based on T2W-MRI only (MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG); split-scar sign), and two based on T2W-MRI+DWI (modified-mrTRG; DWI-patterns). Image quality was graded using a 0-6-point score (including slice thickness and in-plane resolution; sequence angulation; DWI b-values, signal-to-noise, and artefacts); scores < 4 were classified below average. Mixed model linear regression was used to calculate average sensitivity/specificity/accuracy to predict a complete response (versus residual tumor) and assess the impact of reader experience and image quality. Group interobserver agreement (IOA) was calculated using Krippendorff's alpha. Readers were asked to indicate their preferred scoring method(s). RESULTS Average sensitivity/specificity/accuracy was 57%/64%/62% (mrTRG), 36%/79%/66% (split-scar), 40%/79%/67% (modified-mrTRG), and 37%/82%/68% (DWI-patterns); mrTRG showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity and accuracy (p < 0.001) compared to the other methods. IOA was lower for the split scar method (0.18 vs. 0.39-0.43). Higher reader experience had a significant positive effect on diagnostic performance and IOA (except for the split scar sign); below-average imaging quality had a significant negative effect on diagnostic performance. DWI pattern was selected as the preferred method by 73% of readers. CONCLUSIONS Methods incorporating DWI showed the most favorable results when combining diagnostic performance, IOA, and reader preference. Reader experience and image quality clearly impacted diagnostic performance emphasizing the need for state-of-the-art imaging and dedicated radiologist training. KEY POINTS • In a multireader study comparing 4 MRI methods for rectal tumor response evaluation, those incorporating DWI showed the best results when combining diagnostic performance, IOA, and reader preference. • The most preferred method (by 73% of readers) was the "DWI patterns" approach with an accuracy of 68%, high specificity of 82%, and group IOA of 0.43. • Reader experience level and MRI quality had an evident effect on diagnostic performance and IOA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luís Curvo-Semedo
- Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Raphaëla C Dresen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Medical Imaging Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute (U1194), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1106, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Stein RM, Engbersen MP, Stolk T, Lopez-Yurda M, Lahaye MJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Lok CAR, Sonke GS, Van Driel WJ. Peroperative extent of peritoneal metastases affects the surgical outcome and survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:269-276. [PMID: 36088169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determining whether cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is feasible in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and whether extensive surgery is justified is challenging. Accurate patient selection for CRS based on pre- and peroperative parameters will be valuable. The aim of this study is to assess the association between the extent of peritoneal metastases as determined during surgery and completeness of interval CRS and survival. METHODS This single-center observational cohort study included consecutive patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent interval CRS. The 7 Region Count (7RC) was recorded during surgical exploration to systematically quantify the extent of peritoneal metastases. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict surgical outcomes, and Cox regression analysis was done for survival outcomes. RESULTS A total of 316 patients were included for analyses. The median 7RC was 4 (interquartile range: 2-6). Complete CRS was performed in 58%, optimal CRS in 30%, and incomplete CRS in 12% of patients. A higher 7RC was independently associated with lower odds of complete or optimal CRS in multivariable analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.63, p < 0.001). Similarly, a higher 7RC was independently associated with worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.26, p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.25, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION The extent of peritoneal metastases, as expressed by the 7RC during surgery, is an independent predictor for completeness of CRS and has independent prognostic value for progression-free survival and overall survival in addition to completeness of CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M van Stein
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M P Engbersen
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T Stolk
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Lopez-Yurda
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C A R Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J Van Driel
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lambregts DMJ, Bogveradze N, Blomqvist LK, Fokas E, Garcia-Aguilar J, Glimelius B, Gollub MJ, Konishi T, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, Nilsson PJ, Perez RO, Snaebjornsson P, Taylor SA, Tolan DJM, Valentini V, West NP, Wolthuis A, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH. Current controversies in TNM for the radiological staging of rectal cancer and how to deal with them: results of a global online survey and multidisciplinary expert consensus. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4991-5003. [PMID: 35254485 PMCID: PMC9213337 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08591-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To identify the main problem areas in the applicability of the current TNM staging system (8th ed.) for the radiological staging and reporting of rectal cancer and provide practice recommendations on how to handle them.
Methods
A global case-based online survey was conducted including 41 image-based rectal cancer cases focusing on various items included in the TNM system. Cases reaching < 80% agreement among survey respondents were identified as problem areas and discussed among an international expert panel, including 5 radiologists, 6 colorectal surgeons, 4 radiation oncologists, and 3 pathologists.
Results
Three hundred twenty-one respondents (from 32 countries) completed the survey. Sixteen problem areas were identified, related to cT staging in low-rectal cancers, definitions for cT4b and cM1a disease, definitions for mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement, evaluation of lymph nodes versus tumor deposits, and staging of lateral lymph nodes. The expert panel recommended strategies on how to handle these, including advice on cT-stage categorization in case of involvement of different layers of the anal canal, specifications on which structures to include in the definition of cT4b disease, how to define MRF involvement by the primary tumor and other tumor-bearing structures, how to differentiate and report lymph nodes and tumor deposits on MRI, and how to anatomically localize and stage lateral lymph nodes.
Conclusions
The recommendations derived from this global survey and expert panel discussion may serve as a practice guide and support tool for radiologists (and other clinicians) involved in the staging of rectal cancer and may contribute to improved consistency in radiological staging and reporting.
Key Points
• Via a case-based online survey (incl. 321 respondents from 32 countries), we identified 16 problem areas related to the applicability of the TNM staging system for the radiological staging and reporting of rectal cancer.
• A multidisciplinary panel of experts recommended strategies on how to handle these problem areas, including advice on cT-stage categorization in case of involvement of different layers of the anal canal, specifications on which structures to include in the definition of cT4b disease, how to define mesorectal fascia involvement by the primary tumor and other tumor-bearing structures, how to differentiate and report lymph nodes and tumor deposits on MRI, and how to anatomically localize and stage lateral lymph nodes.
• These recommendations may serve as a practice guide and support tool for radiologists (and other clinicians) involved in the staging of rectal cancer and may contribute to improved consistency in radiological staging and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nino Bogveradze
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Lennart K Blomqvist
- Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Benno C. Schmidt Chair in Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Division of Coloproctology, Pelvic Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rodrigo O Perez
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz & Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Damian J M Tolan
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rijsemus CJV, Kok NFM, Aalbers AGJ, Buffart TE, Fijneman RJA, Snaebjornsson P, Engbersen M, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Lahaye MJ. Diagnostic performance of MRI for staging peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol 2022; 149:110225. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
17
|
Engbersen MP, Nerad E, Rijsemus CJV, Buffart T, Beets-Tan RGH, Aalbers AGJ, Kok NFM, Lahaye MJ. Differences in the distribution of peritoneal metastases in right- versus left-sided colon cancer on MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:530-537. [PMID: 34894278 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03366-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Right-sided colon tumors with peritoneal metastases (PM) are associated with a poorer prognosis than left-sided tumors. We hypothesized that a different pattern of spread could be characterized with abdominopelvic MRI. The objective of this study was to explore the spread of PM in relation to the primary tumor location on MRI. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with PM from colon cancer referred to be considered for CRS-HIPEC at a single tertiary referral center. Patients with colon cancer were eligible if they had undergone an abdominopelvic MRI scan following a clinical diagnosis of PM. The frequency of affected PCI regions on MRI (MRI-PCI) was assessed and compared between tumor sidedness. RESULTS One hundred eighteen patients were included with a median age of 65 (IQR: 56-72). 46% percent were male. The median MRI-PCI was 10 (IQR: 5-16) and 8 (IQR: 4-11) for right- and left-sided tumors, respectively (p = 0.39), and the median number of affected regions was 4 (IQR: 2-7 for right-sided and IQR 2-5 for left-sided tumors). PM was most frequently found close to the primary tumor. The odds ratio of patients with PM of left sided to be affected with PM in the upper abdominal regions was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.20-0.90) and with PM on the small bowels or mesentery was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.19-0.92) over a patient with PM of right-sided colon cancer. CONCLUSION MRI can help to assess the spread of PM in colonic cancer. In right-sided tumors, the small bowel and upper abdominal regions are more frequently affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurits P Engbersen
- Department of Radiology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elias Nerad
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte J V Rijsemus
- Department of Radiology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke Buffart
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bogveradze N, El Khababi N, Schurink NW, van Griethuysen JJM, de Bie S, Bosma G, Cappendijk VC, Geenen RWF, Neijenhuis P, Peterson G, Veeken CJ, Vliegen RFA, Maas M, Lahaye MJ, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. Evolutions in rectal cancer MRI staging and risk stratification in The Netherlands. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:38-47. [PMID: 34605966 PMCID: PMC8776669 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03281-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To analyze how the MRI reporting of rectal cancer has evolved (following guideline updates) in The Netherlands. Methods Retrospective analysis of 712 patients (2011–2018) from 8 teaching hospitals in The Netherlands with available original radiological staging reports that were re-evaluated by a dedicated MR expert using updated guideline criteria. Original reports were classified as “free-text,” “semi-structured,” or “template” and completeness of reporting was documented. Patients were categorized as low versus high risk, first based on the original reports (high risk = cT3-4, cN+, and/or cMRF+) and then based on the expert re-evaluations (high risk = cT3cd-4, cN+, MRF+, and/or EMVI+). Evolutions over time were studied by splitting the inclusion period in 3 equal time periods. Results A significant increase in template reporting was observed (from 1.6 to 17.6–29.6%; p < 0.001), along with a significant increase in the reporting of cT-substage, number of N+ and extramesorectal nodes, MRF invasion and tumor-MRF distance, EMVI, anal sphincter involvement, and tumor morphology and circumference. Expert re-evaluation changed the risk classification from high to low risk in 18.0% of cases and from low to high risk in 1.7% (total 19.7%). In the majority (17.9%) of these cases, the changed risk classification was likely (at least in part) related to use of updated guideline criteria, which mainly led to a reduction in high-risk cT-stage and nodal downstaging. Conclusion Updated concepts of risk stratification have increasingly been adopted, accompanied by an increase in template reporting and improved completeness of reporting. Use of updated guideline criteria resulted in considerable downstaging (of mainly high-risk cT-stage and nodal stage). Graphic abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nino Bogveradze
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Acad. F. Todua Medical Center, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Najim El Khababi
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels W Schurink
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Shira de Bie
- Department of Radiology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Gerlof Bosma
- Department of Radiology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent C Cappendijk
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Remy W F Geenen
- Department of Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Neijenhuis
- Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - Gerald Peterson
- Department of Radiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J Veeken
- Department of Radiology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Roy F A Vliegen
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Foley KG, Lahaye MJ, Thoeni RF, Soltes M, Dewhurst C, Barbu ST, Vashist YK, Rafaelsen SR, Arvanitakis M, Perinel J, Wiles R, Roberts SA. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:3358-3368. [PMID: 34918177 PMCID: PMC9038818 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Main recommendations Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.
Source and scope These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Key Point • These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran G Foley
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruedi F Thoeni
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco Medical School, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marek Soltes
- 1st Department of Surgery LF UPJS a UNLP, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Catherine Dewhurst
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- 4th Surgery Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Yogesh K Vashist
- Clinics of Surgery, Department General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Goslar, Germany
| | - Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Cancer Centre, Vejle Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Rebecca Wiles
- Department of Radiology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Min LA, Castagnoli F, Vogel WV, Vellenga JP, van Griethuysen JJM, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. A decade of multi-modality PET and MR imaging in abdominal oncology. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20201351. [PMID: 34387508 PMCID: PMC9328040 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate trends observed in a decade of published research on multimodality PET(/CT)+MR imaging in abdominal oncology, and to explore how these trends are reflected by the use of multimodality imaging performed at our institution. METHODS First, we performed a literature search (2009-2018) including all papers published on the multimodality combination of PET(/CT) and MRI in abdominal oncology. Retrieved papers were categorized according to a structured labelling system, including study design and outcome, cancer and lesion type under investigation and PET-tracer type. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and evolutions over time were plotted graphically. Second, we performed a descriptive analysis of the numbers of MRI, PET/CT and multimodality PET/CT+MRI combinations (performed within a ≤14 days interval) performed during a similar time span at our institution. RESULTS Published research papers involving multimodality PET(/CT)+MRI combinations showed an impressive increase in numbers, both for retrospective combinations of PET/CT and MRI, as well as hybrid PET/MRI. Main areas of research included new PET-tracers, visual PET(/CT)+MRI assessment for staging, and (semi-)quantitative analysis of PET-parameters compared to or combined with MRI-parameters as predictive biomarkers. In line with literature, we also observed a vast increase in numbers of multimodality PET/CT+MRI imaging in our institutional data. CONCLUSIONS The tremendous increase in published literature on multimodality imaging, reflected by our institutional data, shows the continuously growing interest in comprehensive multivariable imaging evaluations to guide oncological practice. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The role of multimodality imaging in oncology is rapidly evolving. This paper summarizes the main applications and recent developments in multimodality imaging, with a specific focus on the combination of PET+MRI in abdominal oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Min
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wouter V Vogel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jisk P Vellenga
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Faculty or Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Keikes L, Kos M, Verbeek XAAM, Van Vegchel T, Nagtegaal ID, Lahaye MJ, Méndez Romero A, De Bruijn S, Verheul HMW, Rütten H, Punt CJA, Tanis PJ, Van Oijen MGH. Conversion of a colorectal cancer guideline into clinical decision trees with assessment of validity. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6184988. [PMID: 33760073 PMCID: PMC8023581 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The interpretation and clinical application of guidelines can be challenging and time-consuming, which may result in noncompliance to guidelines. The aim of this study was to convert the Dutch guideline for colorectal cancer (CRC) into decision trees and subsequently implement decision trees in an online decision support environment to facilitate guideline application. Methods The recommendations of the Dutch CRC guidelines (published in 2014) were translated into decision trees consisting of decision nodes, branches and leaves that represent data items, data item values and recommendations, respectively. Decision trees were discussed with experts in the field and published as interactive open access decision support software (available at www.oncoguide.nl). Decision tree validation and a concordance analysis were performed using consecutive reports (January 2016–January 2017) from CRC multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs) at Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC. Results In total, we developed 34 decision trees driven by 101 decision nodes based on the guideline recommendations. Decision trees represented recommendations for diagnostics (n = 1), staging (n = 10), primary treatment (colon: n = 1, rectum: n = 5, colorectal: n = 9), pathology (n = 4) and follow-up (n = 3) and included one overview decision tree for optimal navigation. We identified several guideline information gaps and areas of inconclusive evidence. A total of 158 patients’ MTB reports were eligible for decision tree validation and resulted in treatment recommendations in 80% of cases. The concordance rate between decision tree treatment recommendations and MTB advices was 81%. Decision trees reported in 22 out of 24 non-concordant cases (92%) that no guideline recommendation was available. Conclusions We successfully converted the Dutch CRC guideline into decision trees and identified several information gaps and areas of inconclusive evidence, the latter being the main cause of the observed disagreement between decision tree recommendations and MTB advices. Decision trees may contribute to future strategies to optimize quality of care for CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Keikes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, Utrecht 3511 DT, Netherlands
| | - Milan Kos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, Utrecht 3511 DT, Netherlands
| | - Xander A A M Verbeek
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, Utrecht 3511 DT, Netherlands
| | - Thijs Van Vegchel
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, Utrecht 3511 DT, Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1066 CX, Netherlands
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015 GD, Netherlands
| | - Sandra De Bruijn
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Reinier de Graafweg 5, Delft, Zuid-Holland, 2625 AD, Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Heidi Rütten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525 GA, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Martijn G H Van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105 AZ, Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, Utrecht 3511 DT, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rovers KP, Bakkers C, Nienhuijs SW, Burger JWA, Creemers GJM, Thijs AMJ, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Madsen EVE, van Meerten E, Tuynman JB, Kusters M, Versteeg KS, Aalbers AGJ, Kok NFM, Buffart TE, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Los M, de Reuver PR, Bremers AJA, Verheul HMW, Kruijff S, de Groot DJA, Witkamp AJ, van Grevenstein WMU, Koopman M, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Kranenburg O, Fijneman RJA, van 't Erve I, Snaebjornsson P, Hemmer PHJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Punt CJA, Tanis PJ, de Hingh IHJT. Perioperative Systemic Therapy vs Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Alone for Resectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:710-720. [PMID: 34009291 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance To date, no randomized clinical trials have investigated perioperative systemic therapy relative to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) alone for resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of perioperative systemic therapy in patients with resectable CPM and the response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants An open-label, parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial in all 9 Dutch tertiary centers for the surgical treatment of CPM enrolled participants between June 15, 2017, and January 9, 2019. Participants were patients with pathologically proven isolated resectable CPM who did not receive systemic therapy within 6 months before enrollment. Interventions Randomization to perioperative systemic therapy or CRS-HIPEC alone. Perioperative systemic therapy comprised either four 3-week neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin), six 2-week neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), or six 2-week neoadjuvant cycles of FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) and either four 3-week adjuvant cycles of capecitabine or six 2-week adjuvant cycles of fluorouracil with leucovorin. Bevacizumab was added to the first 3 (CAPOX) or 4 (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity. Key secondary outcomes were centrally assessed rates of objective radiologic and major pathologic response of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment. Analyses were done modified intention-to-treat in patients starting neoadjuvant treatment (experimental arm) or undergoing upfront surgery (control arm). Results In 79 patients included in the analysis (43 [54%] men; mean [SD] age, 62 [10] years), experimental (n = 37) and control (n = 42) arms did not differ significantly regarding the proportions of macroscopic complete CRS-HIPEC (33 of 37 [89%] vs 36 of 42 [86%] patients; risk ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.23; P = .74) and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity (8 of 37 [22%] vs 14 of 42 [33%] patients; risk ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31-1.37; P = .25). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Objective radiologic and major pathologic response rates of CPM to neoadjuvant treatment were 28% (9 of 32 evaluable patients) and 38% (13 of 34 evaluable patients), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized phase 2 trial in patients diagnosed with resectable CPM, perioperative systemic therapy seemed feasible, safe, and able to induce response of CPM, justifying a phase 3 trial. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02758951.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Anna M J Thijs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther van Meerten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kathelijn S Versteeg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas J A Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Derk Jan A de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris van 't Erve
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
van't Erve I, Rovers KP, Constantinides A, Bolhuis K, Wassenaar ECE, Lurvink RJ, Huysentruyt CJ, Snaebjornsson P, Boerma D, van den Broek D, Buffart TE, Lahaye MJ, Aalbers AGJ, Kok NFM, Meijer GA, Punt CJA, Kranenburg O, de Hingh IHJT, Fijneman RJA. Detection of tumor-derived cell-free DNA from colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases in plasma and peritoneal fluid. J Pathol Clin Res 2021; 7:203-208. [PMID: 33635598 PMCID: PMC8073000 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Tumor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an emerging biomarker for guiding the personalized treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). While patients with CRC liver metastases (CRC-LM) have relatively high levels of plasma cfDNA, little is known about patients with CRC peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). This study evaluated the presence of tumor-derived cfDNA in plasma and peritoneal fluid (i.e. ascites or peritoneal washing) in 20 patients with isolated CRC-PM and in the plasma of 100 patients with isolated CRC-LM. Among tumor tissue KRAS/BRAF mutation carriers, tumor-derived cfDNA was detected by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in plasma of 93% of CRC-LM and 20% of CRC-PM patients and in peritoneal fluid in all CRC-PM patients. Mutant allele fraction (MAF) and mutant copies per ml (MTc/ml) were lower in CRC-PM plasma than in CRC-LM plasma (median MAF = 0.28 versus 18.9%, p < 0.0001; median MTc/ml = 21 versus 1,758, p < 0.0001). Within patients with CRC-PM, higher cfDNA levels were observed in peritoneal fluid than in plasma (median MAF = 16.4 versus 0.28%, p = 0.0019; median MTc/ml = 305 versus 21, p = 0.0034). These data imply that tumor-derived cfDNA in plasma is a poor biomarker to monitor CRC-PM. Instead, cfDNA detection in peritoneal fluid may offer an alternative to guide CRC-PM treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris van't Erve
- Department of PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of SurgeryCatharina Cancer InstituteEindhovenThe Netherlands
| | - Alexander Constantinides
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and CancerUMC UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical OncologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of SurgeryCatharina Cancer InstituteEindhovenThe Netherlands
| | - Clément J Huysentruyt
- Department of PathologyLaboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology (PAMM)EindhovenThe Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of SurgerySt. Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory MedicineThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Tineke E Buffart
- Department of Gastrointestinal OncologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of RadiologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Arend GJ Aalbers
- Department of SurgeryThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Niels FM Kok
- Department of SurgeryThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Cornelis JA Punt
- Department of Medical OncologyAmsterdam University Medical CentersAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary CareUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Imaging and CancerUMC UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Utrecht Platform for Organoid TechnologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ignace HJT de Hingh
- Department of SurgeryCatharina Cancer InstituteEindhovenThe Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW‐School for Oncology and Developmental BiologyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Remond JA Fijneman
- Department of PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Engbersen MP, Rijsemus CJV, Nederend J, Aalbers AGJ, de Hingh IHJT, Retel V, Lambregts DMJ, Van der Hoeven EJRJ, Boerma D, Wiezer MJ, De Vries M, Madsen EVE, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Van Koeverden S, De Reuver PR, Beets-Tan RGH, Kok NFM, Lahaye MJ. Dedicated MRI staging versus surgical staging of peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer patients considered for CRS-HIPEC; the DISCO randomized multicenter trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:464. [PMID: 33902498 PMCID: PMC8077799 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08168-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Selecting patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCPM) who might benefit from cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is challenging. Computed tomography generally underestimates the peritoneal tumor load. Diagnostic laparoscopy is often used to determine whether patients are amenable for surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown to be accurate in predicting completeness of CRS. The aim of this study is to determine whether MRI can effectively reduce the need for surgical staging. Methods The study is designed as a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of colorectal cancer patients who are deemed eligible for CRS-HIPEC after conventional CT staging. Patients are randomly assigned to either MRI based staging (arm A) or to standard surgical staging with or without laparoscopy (arm B). In arm A, MRI assessment will determine whether patients are eligible for CRS-HIPEC. In borderline cases, an additional diagnostic laparoscopy is advised. The primary outcome is the number of unnecessary surgical procedures in both arms defined as: all surgeries in patients with definitely inoperable disease (PCI > 24) or explorative surgeries in patients with limited disease (PCI < 15). Secondary outcomes include correlations between surgical findings and MRI findings, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life (QOL) analysis. Conclusion This randomized trial determines whether MRI can effectively replace surgical staging in patients with CRCPM considered for CRS-HIPEC. Trial registration Registered in the clinical trials registry of U.S. National Library of Medicine under NCT04231175.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Engbersen
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - C J V Rijsemus
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - V Retel
- Department of Psychosocial research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E J R J Van der Hoeven
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M De Vries
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E V E Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A R M Brandt-Kerkhof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Van Koeverden
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - P R De Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Engbersen MP, Lahaye MJ, Lok CAR, Koole SN, Sonke GS, Beets-Tan RGH, Van Driel WJ. Peroperative scoring systems for predicting the outcome of cytoreductive surgery in advanced-stage ovarian cancer - A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1856-1861. [PMID: 33814239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The extent of peritoneal metastases (PM) largely determines the possibility of complete or optimal cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. An objective scoring system to quantify the extent of PM can help clinicians to decide whether or not to embark on CRS. Therefore several scoring systems have been developed by different research teams and this review summarizes their performance in predicting a complete or optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A systematic search in the MEDLINE database revealed 19 articles that described a total of five main scoring systems to predict the completeness of CRS in patients with FIGO stage III-IV ovarian cancer based on the surgical exploration of the abdominal cavity; PCI, PIV, Eisenkop, Espada, and Kasper. The Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and the Predictive Index Value (PIV) were mentioned most frequently and showed AUCs of 0.69-0.92 and 0.66-0.98, respectively. Due to the use of different cut-offs sensitivities and specificities greatly varied. Therefore with the current data, no scoring system could be identified as best. An objective measure of the extent of disease can be of great clinical use for identifying ovarian cancer patients for which a complete (or optimal) CRS is achievable, however due to local differences in treatment strategies and surgical policy a widely adopted objective scoring system with a standard cut-off value is not feasible. Nevertheless, objective scoring systems can play an important role to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Engbersen
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C A R Lok
- Center of Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek- Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S N Koole
- Center of Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek- Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek- Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - W J Van Driel
- Center of Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek- Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 900203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stokkel LE, Stokkel MPM, Donswijk ML, Lahaye MJ, Bekers EM, van Rhijn BWG, Mertens LS. The Diagnostic Value of FDG-PET/CT for Urachal Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:373-380. [PMID: 33858788 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare malignancy that often presents at an advanced stage with metastases in up to a quarter of patients. There is no consensus on the optimal form of staging for patients with UrC. In the present study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emitted tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for UrC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 40 consecutive patients who were staged for urachal cancer between 2010 and 2020. They underwent a total of 62 FDG-PET/CTs (40 for primary staging, and 22 during follow-up), which were compared with standard-of-care contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). The metabolic detection of primary tumors, lymph node metastases (LNMs), peritoneal metastases (PMs), distant metastases (DMs), and local recurrence by FDG-PET/CT was evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated compared with CECT. Histopathology or follow-up imaging was the reference standard. RESULTS Of all 40 patients, 33 patients (83%) had urachal adenocarcinoma-26 (65%) with a mucinous component and 7 (17%) with invasive urothelial carcinoma. All local UrC tumors could be visualized on CT, and 80% showed increased FDG uptake. At initial staging, FDG-PET/CT detected FDG-avid LNMs, PMs, and DMs in 50%, 17%, and 25% of patients, respectively. These metastases were also visualized on CECT. During follow up, FDG-PET/CT revealed FDG-avid local recurrences that were not seen on CT in two out of eight patients (25%). CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates that most UrC can be visualized on FDG-PET/CT. At initial diagnosis, FDG-PET/CT does not seem to yield additional information compared with CECT; however, FDG-PET/CT may be helpful during follow-up. This is a small study, and the findings should be corroborated with larger series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Stokkel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise M Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rovers KP, Wassenaar ECE, Lurvink RJ, Creemers GJM, Burger JWA, Los M, Huysentruyt CJR, van Lijnschoten G, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Deenen MJ, Wiezer MJ, Nienhuijs SW, Boerma D, de Hingh IHJT. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (Oxaliplatin) for Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial (CRC-PIPAC). Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5311-5326. [PMID: 33544279 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09558-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its increasing use, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC-OX) has never been prospectively investigated as a palliative monotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases in clinical trials. This trial aimed to assess the safety (primary aim) and antitumor activity (key secondary aim) of PIPAC-OX monotherapy in patients with unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases. METHODS In this two-center, single-arm, phase II trial, patients with isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases in any line of palliative treatment underwent 6-weekly PIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2). Key outcomes were major treatment-related adverse events (primary outcome), minor treatment-related adverse events, hospital stay, tumor response (radiological, biochemical, pathological, ascites), progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Twenty enrolled patients underwent 59 (median 3, range 1-6) PIPAC-OX procedures. Major treatment-related adverse events occurred in 3 of 20 (15%) patients after 5 of 59 (8%) procedures (abdominal pain, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, iatrogenic pneumothorax, transient liver toxicity), including one possibly treatment-related death (sepsis of unknown origin). Minor treatment-related adverse events occurred in all patients after 57 of 59 (97%) procedures, the most common being abdominal pain (all patients after 88% of procedures) and nausea (65% of patients after 39% of procedures). Median hospital stay was 1 day (range 0-3). Response rates were 0% (radiological), 50% (biochemical), 56% (pathological), and 56% (ascites). Median progression-free and overall survival were 3.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5-5.7) and 8.0 months (IQR 6.3-12.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing PIPAC-OX monotherapy, some major adverse events occurred and minor adverse events were common. The clinical relevance of observed biochemical, pathological, and ascites responses remains to be determined, especially since radiological response was absent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Emma C E Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Deenen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. .,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Huizing DMV, Aalbersberg EA, Versleijen MWJ, Tesselaar MET, Walraven I, Lahaye MJ, de Wit-van der Veen BJ, Stokkel MPM. Early response assessment and prediction of overall survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:57. [PMID: 32778165 PMCID: PMC7418334 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00335-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be evaluated using anatomical imaging (CT/MRI), somatostatin receptor imaging ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT), and serum Chromogranin-A (CgA). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the role of these response evaluation methods and their predictive value for overall survival (OS). Methods Imaging and CgA levels were acquired prior to start of PRRT, and 3 and 9 months after completion. Tumour size was measured on anatomical imaging and response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake was quantified in both target lesions depicted on anatomical imaging and separately identified PET target lesions, which were either followed over time or newly identified on each scan with PERCIST-based criteria. Response evaluation methods were compared with Cox regression analyses and Log Rank tests for association with OS. Results A total of 44 patients were included, with median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 26–36 months) and median OS of 39 months (IQR 32mo-not reached)d. Progressive disease after 9 months (according to RECIST 1.1) was significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 9.04 (95% CI 2.10–38.85)], however not compared to patients with partial response. According to Choi criteria, progressive disease was also significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 6.10 (95% CI 1.38–27.05)] and compared to patients with partial response [HR 22.66 (95% CI 2.33–219.99)]. In some patients, new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging. After 3 months, new lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT which were not visible on anatomical imaging, were detected in 4/41 (10%) patients and in another 3/27 (11%) patients after 9 months. However, no associations between change in uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT or serum CgA measurements and OS was observed. Conclusions Progression on anatomical imaging performed 9 months after PRRT is associated with worse OS compared to stable disease or partial response. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake, and serum CgA after PRRT were not predictive for OS in this cohort with limited number of patients and follow-up time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne M V Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Else A Aalbersberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle W J Versleijen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mentink MG, Bakers FCH, Mihl C, Lahaye MJ, Rennenberg RJMW, Latten BGH, Kubat B, Hofman PAM. Introduction of postmortem CT increases the postmortem examination rate without negatively impacting the rate of traditional autopsy in daily practice: an implementation study. J Clin Pathol 2020; 74:177-181. [PMID: 32675309 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this implementation study was to assess the effect of postmortem CT (PMCT) and postmortem sampling (PMS) on (traditional) autopsy and postmortem examination rates. Additionally, the feasibility of PMCT and PMS in daily practice was assessed. METHODS For a period of 23 months, PMCT and PMS were used as additional modalities to the autopsy at the Department of Internal Medicine. The next of kin provided consent for 123 postmortem examinations. Autopsy rates were derived from the Dutch Pathology Registry, and postmortem examination rates were calculated for the period before, during and after the study period, and the exclusion rate, table time, time interval to informing the referring clinicians with results and the time interval to the Multidisciplinary Mortality Review Board (MMRB) meeting were objectified to assess the feasibility. RESULTS The postmortem examination rate increased (from 18.8% to 32.5%, p<0.001) without a decline in the autopsy rate. The autopsy rate did not change substantially after implementation (0.2% decrease). The exclusion rate was 2%, the table time was 23 min, and a median time interval of 4.1 hours between PMCT and discussing its results with the referring clinicians was observed. Additionally, more than 80% of the MMRB meetings were held within 8 weeks after the death of the patient. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that the implementation of a multidisciplinary postmortem examination is feasible in daily practice and does not adversely affect the autopsy rate, while increasing the postmortem examination rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max G Mentink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans C H Bakers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Casper Mihl
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roger J M W Rennenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart G H Latten
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Netherlands Forensic Institute, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Bela Kubat
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Netherlands Forensic Institute, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Paul A M Hofman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Engbersen MP, Aalbers AGJ, Van't Sant-Jansen I, Velsing JDR, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Kok NFM, Lahaye MJ. Extent of Peritoneal Metastases on Preoperative DW-MRI is Predictive of Disease-Free and Overall Survival for CRS/HIPEC Candidates with Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3516-3524. [PMID: 32239338 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08416-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether the extent of peritoneal metastases (PMs) on preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) can be used as a biomarker of disease-free and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer who are considered for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). METHODS For this retrospective cohort study, patients with PMs considered for CRS/HIPEC who underwent DW-MRI for preoperative staging in 2016-2017 were included. The DW-MRI protocol consisted of diffusion-weighted, T2-weighted, and pre- and post-gadolinium T1-weighted imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. DW-MRI images were evaluated by two independent readers to determine the extent of PMs represented by the Peritoneal Cancer Index (MRI-PCI), as well as extraperitoneal metastases. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the prognostic value of DW-MRI for overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were included. CRS/HIPEC was planned for 53 patients and completed in 50 patients (60.5%). Median follow-up after DW-MRI was 23 months (interquartile range 13-24). The MRI-PCI of both readers showed prognostic value for overall survival, independently of whether R1 resection was achieved (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06-1.08; p < 0.05). For the patients who received successful CRS/HIPEC, the MRI-PCI also showed independent prognostic value for disease-free survival for both readers (HR 1.09-1.10; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The extent of PMs on preoperative DW-MRI is an independent predictor of overall and disease-free survival and should therefore be considered as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurits P Engbersen
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Van't Sant-Jansen
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen D R Velsing
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Haak HE, Maas M, Lahaye MJ, Boellaard TN, Delli Pizzi A, Mihl C, van der Zee D, Fabris C, van der Sande ME, Melenhorst J, Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL, Lambregts DMJ. Selection of Patients for Organ Preservation After Chemoradiotherapy: MRI Identifies Poor Responders Who Can Go Straight to Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2732-2739. [PMID: 32172333 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08334-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can accurately identify poor responders after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) who will need to go straight to surgery, and to evaluate whether results are reproducible among radiologists with different levels of expertise. METHODS Seven independent readers with different levels of expertise retrospectively evaluated the restaging MRIs (T2-weighted + diffusion-weighted imaging [T2W + DWI]) of 62 patients and categorized them as (1) poor responders - highly suspicious of tumor; (2) intermediate responders - tumor most likely; and (3) good - potential (near) complete responders. The reference standard was histopathology after surgery (or long-term follow-up in the case of a watch-and-wait program). RESULTS Fourteen patients were complete responders and 48 had residual tumor. The median percentage of patients categorized by the seven readers as 'poor', 'intermediate', and 'good' responders was 21% (range 11-37%), 50% (range 23-58%), and 29% (range 23-42%), respectively. The vast majority of poor responders had histopathologically confirmed residual tumor (73% ypT3-4), with a low rate (0-5%) of 'missed complete responders'. Of the 14 confirmed complete responders, a median percentage of 71% were categorized in the MR-good response group and 29% were categorized in the MR-intermediate response group. CONCLUSIONS Radiologists of varying experience levels should be able to use MRI to identify the ± 20% subgroup of poor responders who will definitely require surgical resection after CRT. This may facilitate more selective use of endoscopy, particularly in general settings or in centers with limited access to endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hester E Haak
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Delli Pizzi
- ITAB Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Casper Mihl
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cristina Fabris
- Department of Radiology, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marit E van der Sande
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jarno Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schurink NW, Min LA, Berbee M, van Elmpt W, van Griethuysen JJM, Bakers FCH, Roberti S, van Kranen SR, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. Value of combined multiparametric MRI and FDG-PET/CT to identify well-responding rectal cancer patients before the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:2945-2954. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06638-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
33
|
Rovers KP, Lurvink RJ, Wassenaar EC, Kootstra TJ, Scholten HJ, Tajzai R, Deenen MJ, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Huysentruyt CJ, van 't Erve I, Fijneman RJ, Constantinides A, Kranenburg O, Los M, Thijs AM, Creemers GJM, Burger JW, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC) with oxaliplatin as a palliative monotherapy for isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a Dutch, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (CRC-PIPAC). BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030408. [PMID: 31352425 PMCID: PMC6661551 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Repetitive electrostatic pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (ePIPAC-OX) is offered as a palliative treatment option for patients with isolated unresectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in several centres worldwide. However, little is known about its feasibility, safety, tolerability, efficacy, costs and pharmacokinetics in this setting. This study aims to explore these parameters in patients with isolated unresectable colorectal PM who receive repetitive ePIPAC-OX as a palliative monotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study is performed in two Dutch tertiary referral hospitals for the surgical treatment of colorectal PM. Eligible patients are adults who have histologically or cytologically proven isolated unresectable PM of a colorectal or appendiceal carcinoma, a good performance status, adequate organ functions and no symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction. Instead of standard palliative treatment, enrolled patients receive laparoscopy-controlled ePIPAC-OX (92 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA)) with intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m2 BSA) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 BSA) every 6 weeks. Four weeks after each procedure, patients undergo clinical, radiological and biochemical evaluation. ePIPAC-OX is repeated until disease progression, after which standard palliative treatment is (re)considered. The primary outcome is the number of patients with major toxicity (grade ≥3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0) up to 4 weeks after the last ePIPAC-OX. Secondary outcomes are the environmental safety of ePIPAC-OX, procedure-related characteristics, minor toxicity, postoperative complications, hospital stay, readmissions, quality of life, costs, pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin, progression-free survival, overall survival, and the radiological, histopathological, cytological, biochemical and macroscopic tumour response. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is approved by an ethics committee, the Dutch competent authority and the institutional review boards of both study centres. Results are intended for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and for presentation to patients, healthcare professionals and other stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03246321, Pre-results; ISRCTN89947480, Pre-results; NTR6603, Pre-results; EudraCT: 2017-000927-29, Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J Lurvink
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Ce Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Jm Kootstra
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Harm J Scholten
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Rudaba Tajzai
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Deenen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris van 't Erve
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remond Ja Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Mj Thijs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jacobus Wa Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace Hjt de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rovers KP, Bakkers C, Simkens GAAM, Burger JWA, Nienhuijs SW, Creemers GJM, Thijs AMJ, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Madsen EVE, Ayez N, de Boer NL, van Meerten E, Tuynman JB, Kusters M, Sluiter NR, Verheul HMW, van der Vliet HJ, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Wassenaar ECE, Los M, Hunting CB, Aalbers AGJ, Kok NFM, Kuhlmann KFD, Boot H, Chalabi M, Kruijff S, Been LB, van Ginkel RJ, de Groot DJA, Fehrmann RSN, de Wilt JHW, Bremers AJA, de Reuver PR, Radema SA, Herbschleb KH, van Grevenstein WMU, Witkamp AJ, Koopman M, Haj Mohammad N, van Duyn EB, Mastboom WJB, Mekenkamp LJM, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Snaebjornsson P, Verhoef C, van Laarhoven HWM, Zwinderman AH, Bouma JM, Kranenburg O, van 't Erve I, Fijneman RJA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hemmer PHJ, Punt CJA, Tanis PJ, de Hingh IHJT. Perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC versus upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study (CAIRO6). BMC Cancer 2019; 19:390. [PMID: 31023318 PMCID: PMC6485075 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5545-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard treatment for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in the Netherlands. This study investigates whether addition of perioperative systemic therapy to CRS-HIPEC improves oncological outcomes. Methods This open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study is performed in nine Dutch tertiary referral centres. Eligible patients are adults who have a good performance status, histologically or cytologically proven resectable PM of a colorectal adenocarcinoma, no systemic colorectal metastases, no systemic therapy for colorectal cancer within six months prior to enrolment, and no previous CRS-HIPEC. Eligible patients are randomised (1:1) to perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC (experimental arm) or upfront CRS-HIPEC alone (control arm) by using central randomisation software with minimisation stratified by a peritoneal cancer index of 0–10 or 11–20, metachronous or synchronous PM, previous systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, and HIPEC with oxaliplatin or mitomycin C. At the treating physician’s discretion, perioperative systemic therapy consists of either four 3-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX), six 2-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), or six 2-weekly neoadjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by four 3-weekly (capecitabine) or six 2-weekly (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) adjuvant cycles of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Bevacizumab is added to the first three (CAPOX) or four (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles. The first 80 patients are enrolled in a phase II study to explore the feasibility of accrual and the feasibility, safety, and tolerance of perioperative systemic therapy. If predefined criteria of feasibility and safety are met, the study continues as a phase III study with 3-year overall survival as primary endpoint. A total of 358 patients is needed to detect the hypothesised 15% increase in 3-year overall survival (control arm 50%; experimental arm 65%). Secondary endpoints are surgical characteristics, major postoperative morbidity, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, health-related quality of life, costs, major systemic therapy related toxicity, and objective radiological and histopathological response rates. Discussion This is the first randomised study that prospectively compares oncological outcomes of perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC with upfront CRS-HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal PM. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov/NCT02758951, NTR/NTR6301, ISRCTN/ISRCTN15977568, EudraCT/2016–001865-99.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Geert A A M Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602, Eindhoven, ZA, Netherlands
| | - Anna M J Thijs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602, Eindhoven, ZA, Netherlands
| | | | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, Netherlands
| | - Ninos Ayez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, Netherlands
| | - Nadine L de Boer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, Netherlands
| | - Esther van Meerten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUMC, PO Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUMC, PO Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - Nina R Sluiter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUMC, PO Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUMC, PO Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - Hans J van der Vliet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VUMC, PO Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430, Nieuwegein, EM, Netherlands
| | - Djamila Boerma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430, Nieuwegein, EM, Netherlands
| | - Emma C E Wassenaar
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430, Nieuwegein, EM, Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430, Nieuwegein, EM, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis B Hunting
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430, Nieuwegein, EM, Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Henk Boot
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, RB, Netherlands
| | - Lukas B Been
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, RB, Netherlands
| | - Robert J van Ginkel
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, RB, Netherlands
| | - Derk Jan A de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, Groningen, RB, Netherlands
| | - Rudolf S N Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, Groningen, RB, Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands
| | - Andreas J A Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands
| | - Philip R de Reuver
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands
| | - Sandra A Radema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands
| | - Karin H Herbschleb
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, Netherlands
| | - Eino B van Duyn
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, 7500, Enschede, KA, Netherlands
| | - Walter J B Mastboom
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, 7500, Enschede, KA, Netherlands
| | - Leonie J M Mekenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO Box 50000, 7500, Enschede, KA, Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602, Eindhoven, ZA, Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000, Rotterdam, CA, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100, Amsterdam, DD, Netherlands
| | - Aeilko H Zwinderman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100, Amsterdam, DD, Netherlands
| | - Jeanette M Bouma
- Clinical Trial Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501, Utrecht, DB, Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, Netherlands
| | - Iris van 't Erve
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, Amsterdam, BE, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100, Amsterdam, DD, Netherlands
| | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, RB, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100, Amsterdam, DD, Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, PO Box 22660, 1100, Amsterdam, DD, Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nerad E, Delli Pizzi A, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Wadhwani S, Bakers FCH, van den Bosch HCM, Beets-Tan RGH, Lahaye MJ. The Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) is a useful biomarker in predicting metastatic colon cancer using the ADC-value of the primary tumor. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0211830. [PMID: 30721268 PMCID: PMC6363286 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the role of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a potential imaging biomarker to predict metastasis (lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis) in colon cancer based on the ADC-value of the primary tumor. Methods Thirty patients (21M, 9F) were included retrospectively. All patients received a 1.5T MRI of the colon including T2 and DWI sequences. ADC maps were calculated for each patient. An expert reader manually delineated all colon tumors to measure mean ADC and histogram metrics (mean, min, max, median, standard deviation (SD), skewness, kurtosis, 5th-95th percentiles) were calculated. Advanced colon cancer was defined as lymph node mestastasis (N+) or distant metastasis (M+). The student Mann Whitney U-test was used to assess the differences between the ADC means of early and advanced colon cancer. To compare the accuracy of lymph node metastasis (N+) prediction based on morpholigical criteria versus ADC-value of the primary tumor, two blinded readers, determined the lymph node metastasis (N0 vs N+) based on morphological criteria. The sensitivity and specificity in predicting lymph node metastasis was calculated for both readers and for the ADC-value of the primary tumor, with histopathology results as the gold standard. Results There was a significant difference between the mean ADC-value of advanced versus early tumors (p = 0.002). The optimal cut off value was 1179 * 10−3 mm2/s with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 and a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 86% respectively to predict advanced tumors. Histogram analyses did not add any significant additional value. The sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of lymph node metastasis based on morphological criteria were 40% and 63% for reader 1 and 30% and 88% for reader 2 respectively. The primary tumor ADC-value using 1.179 * 10−3 mm2/s as threshold had a 100% sensitivity and specificity in predicting lymph node metastasis. Conclusion The ADC-value of the primary tumor has the potential to predict advanced colon cancer, defined as lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis, with lower ADC values significantly associated with advanced tumors. Furthermore the ADC-value of the primary tumor increases the prediction accuracy of lymph node metastasis compared with morphological criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Nerad
- University of Maastricht and GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge University Hospitals NHS trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Andrea Delli Pizzi
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technology (ITAB), Gabriele d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sharan Wadhwani
- Department of radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Birmingham Hospitals NHS trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Frans C. H. Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
- University of Maastricht and GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J. Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van 't Sant I, van Eden WJ, Engbersen MP, Kok NFM, Woensdregt K, Lambregts DMJ, Shanmuganathan S, Beets-Tan RGH, Aalbers AGJ, Lahaye MJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI assessment of the peritoneal cancer index before cytoreductive surgery. Br J Surg 2018; 106:491-498. [PMID: 30353920 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with limited peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer may be candidates for an aggressive surgical approach including cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Selection is based on surgical inspection during laparoscopy or laparotomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) can be used to select patients for CRS-HIPEC. METHODS This was a prospective study at a tertiary referral centre. Patients with confirmed or suspected colorectal peritoneal metastases scheduled for exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy were eligible. Two radiologists assessed the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) on CT (CT-PCI) and DW-MRI (MRI-PCI). The reference standard was PCI at surgery. Radiologists were blinded to the surgical PCI and to each other's findings. The main outcome was the accuracy of DW-MRI in predicting whether patients had resectable disease (PCI less than 21) or not. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were included in the study, of whom 49 could be evaluated. The mean(s.d.) PCI at surgery was 11·27(7·53). The mean MRI-PCI was 10·18(7·07) for reader 1 and 8·59(7·08) for reader 2. Readers 1 and 2 correctly staged 47 of 49 and 44 of 49 patients respectively (accuracy 96 and 90 per cent). Both readers detected all patients with resectable disease with a PCI below 21 at surgery (sensitivity 100 per cent). No patient was overstaged. The intraclass correlation (ICC) between readers was excellent (ICC 0·91, 95 per cent c.i. 0·77 to 0·96). MRI-PCI had a stronger correlation with surgical PCI (ICC 0·83-0·88) than did CT-PCI (ICC 0·39-0·44). CONCLUSION DW-MRI is a promising non-invasive tool to guide treatment selection in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I van 't Sant
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W J van Eden
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P Engbersen
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Woensdregt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S Shanmuganathan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lambregts DMJ, Delli Pizzi A, Lahaye MJ, van Griethuysen JJM, Maas M, Beets GL, Bakers FCH, Beets-Tan RGH. A Pattern-Based Approach Combining Tumor Morphology on MRI With Distinct Signal Patterns on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess Response of Rectal Tumors After Chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61:328-337. [PMID: 29369900 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diffusion-weighted imaging is increasingly used in rectal cancer MRI to assess response after chemoradiotherapy. Certain pitfalls (eg, artefacts) may hamper diffusion-MRI assessment, leading to suboptimal diagnostic performance. Combining diffusion-weighted MRI with the underlying morphology on standard (T2-weighted) MRI may help overcome these pitfalls. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a pattern-based approach combining tumor morphology on T2-weighted MRI with distinct diffusion-weighted imaging signal patterns to assess response after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. DESIGN Response to chemoradiotherapy was scored according to 4 patterns: 1) cases with either a clear residual mass with corresponding high-diffusion signal (A+) or completely normalized wall without diffusion signal (A-); 2) cases with circular and/or irregular fibrosis with (B+) or without (B-) small foci of diffusion signal scattered throughout the fibrosis; 3) cases with semicircular fibrosis with (C+) or without (C-) high diffusion signal at the inner margin of the fibrosis; and 4) polypoid tumors showing regression of the polyp and fibrosis at the site of the stalk with (D+) or without (D-) focal high-diffusion signal in the stalk. A total of 75 cases were rescored by an independent second reader to study interobserver variations. Standard of reference was histopathology or long-term outcome. SETTINGS The study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS A total of 222 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnostic performance to discriminate between a complete response and residual tumor was measured. RESULTS The pattern-based approach resulted in a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 77%, positive predictive value of 88%, negative predictive value of 87%, and overall accuracy of 88% to differentiate between tumor versus complete response. Accuracies per pattern were 100% (A), 74% (B), 86% (C), and 92% (D). Interobserver agreement was good (κ = 0.75). LIMITATIONS The study included no comparison with routine (nonpattern) diffusion-MRI assessment. CONCLUSIONS A pattern-based approach combining tumor morphology with distinct diffusion-weighted imaging patterns results in good diagnostic performance to assess response. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A433.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Delli Pizzi
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, Gabriele d'Annunzio University, SS Annunziate Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans C H Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM, Lambregts DMJ, Lahaye MJ, Parmar C, Bakers FCH, Peters NHGM, Beets-Tan RGH, Aerts HJWL. Author Correction: Deep Learning for Fully-Automated Localization and Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on Multiparametric MR. Sci Rep 2018; 8:2589. [PMID: 29396399 PMCID: PMC5797196 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20029-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Trebeschi
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chintan Parmar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Frans C H Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicky H G M Peters
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, location Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
van Griethuysen JJM, Bus EM, Hauptmann M, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Ter Beek LC, Beets GL, Bakers FCH, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. Gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on diffusion-weighted MRI of the rectum at 1.5 T - Effect of applying a micro-enema to improve image quality. Eur J Radiol 2017; 99:131-137. [PMID: 29362144 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assess whether application of a micro-enema can reduce gas-induced susceptibility artefacts in Single-shot Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the rectum at 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of n = 50 rectal cancer patients who each underwent multiple DWI-MRIs (1.5 T) from 2012 to 2016 as part of routine follow-up during a watch-and-wait approach after chemoradiotherapy. From March 2014 DWI-MRIs were routinely acquired after application of a preparatory micro-enema (Microlax®; 5 ml; self-administered shortly before acquisition); before March 2014 no bowel preparation was given. In total, 335 scans were scored by an experienced reader for the presence/severity of gas-artefacts (on b1000 DWI), ranging from 0 (no artefact) to 5 (severe artefact). A score ≥3 (moderate-severe) was considered a clinically relevant artefact. A random sample of 100 scans was re-assessed by a second independent reader to study inter-observer effects. Scores were compared between the scans performed without and with a preparatory micro-enema using univariable and multivariable logistic regression taking into account potential confounding factors (age/gender, acquisition parameters, MRI-hardware, rectoscopy prior to MRI). RESULTS Clinically relevant gas-artefacts were seen in 24.3% (no micro-enema) vs. 3.7% (micro-enema), odds ratios were 0.118 in univariable and 0.230 in multivariable regression (P = 0.0005 and 0.0291). Mean severity score (±SD) was 1.19 ± 1.71 (no-enema) vs 0.32 ± 0.77 (micro-enema), odds ratios were 0.321 (P < 0.0001) and 0.489 (P = 0.0461) in uni- and multivariable regression, respectively. Inter-observer agreement was excellent (κ0.85). CONCLUSION Use of a preparatory micro-enema shortly before rectal EPI-DWI examinations performed at 1.5 T MRI significantly reduces both the incidence and severity of gas-induced artefacts, compared to examinations performed without bowel preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elyse M Bus
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leon C Ter Beek
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans C H Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM, Lambregts DMJ, Lahaye MJ, Parmar C, Bakers FCH, Peters NHGM, Beets-Tan RGH, Aerts HJWL. Deep Learning for Fully-Automated Localization and Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on Multiparametric MR. Sci Rep 2017; 7:5301. [PMID: 28706185 PMCID: PMC5509680 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05728-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can provide detailed information of the physical characteristics of rectum tumours. Several investigations suggest that volumetric analyses on anatomical and functional MRI contain clinically valuable information. However, manual delineation of tumours is a time consuming procedure, as it requires a high level of expertise. Here, we evaluate deep learning methods for automatic localization and segmentation of rectal cancers on multiparametric MR imaging. MRI scans (1.5T, T2-weighted, and DWI) of 140 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included in our analysis, equally divided between discovery and validation datasets. Two expert radiologists segmented each tumor. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on the multiparametric MRIs of the discovery set to classify each voxel into tumour or non-tumour. On the independent validation dataset, the CNN showed high segmentation accuracy for reader1 (Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC = 0.68) and reader2 (DSC = 0.70). The area under the curve (AUC) of the resulting probability maps was very high for both readers, AUC = 0.99 (SD = 0.05). Our results demonstrate that deep learning can perform accurate localization and segmentation of rectal cancer in MR imaging in the majority of patients. Deep learning technologies have the potential to improve the speed and accuracy of MRI-based rectum segmentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Trebeschi
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M van Griethuysen
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chintan Parmar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Frans C H Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicky H G M Peters
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, location Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Heeswijk MM, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Lahaye MJ, Ayas Z, Slenter JMGM, Beets GL, Bakers FCH, Beets-Tan RGH. Measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient in primary rectal tumors: is there a benefit in performing histogram analyses? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:1627-1636. [PMID: 28160039 PMCID: PMC5486825 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1062-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a potential prognostic imaging marker in rectal cancer. Typically, mean ADC values are used, derived from precise manual whole-volume tumor delineations by experts. The aim was first to explore whether non-precise circular delineation combined with histogram analysis can be a less cumbersome alternative to acquire similar ADC measurements and second to explore whether histogram analyses provide additional prognostic information. Methods Thirty-seven patients who underwent a primary staging MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI; b0, 25, 50, 100, 500, 1000; 1.5 T) were included. Volumes-of-interest (VOIs) were drawn on b1000-DWI: (a) precise delineation, manually tracing tumor boundaries (2 expert readers), and (b) non-precise delineation, drawing circular VOIs with a wide margin around the tumor (2 non-experts). Mean ADC and histogram metrics (mean, min, max, median, SD, skewness, kurtosis, 5th–95th percentiles) were derived from the VOIs and delineation time was recorded. Measurements were compared between the two methods and correlated with prognostic outcome parameters. Results Median delineation time reduced from 47–165 s (precise) to 21–43 s (non-precise). The 45th percentile of the non-precise delineation showed the best correlation with the mean ADC from the precise delineation as the reference standard (ICC 0.71–0.75). None of the mean ADC or histogram parameters showed significant prognostic value; only the total tumor volume (VOI) was significantly larger in patients with positive clinical N stage and mesorectal fascia involvement. Conclusion When performing non-precise tumor delineation, histogram analysis (in specific 45th ADC percentile) may be used as an alternative to obtain similar ADC values as with precise whole tumor delineation. Histogram analyses are not beneficial to obtain additional prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam M van Heeswijk
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology- Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Z Ayas
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos M G M Slenter
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology- Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frans C H Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology- Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lambregts DMJ, van Heeswijk MM, Delli Pizzi A, van Elderen SGC, Andrade L, Peters NHGM, Kint PAM, Osinga-de Jong M, Bipat S, Ooms R, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Bakers FCH, Beets-Tan RGH. Diffusion-weighted MRI to assess response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: main interpretation pitfalls and their use for teaching. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:4445-4454. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4830-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Revised: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
43
|
Lodewick TM, Arnoldussen CW, Lahaye MJ, van Mierlo KM, Neumann UP, Beets-Tan RG, Dejong CH, van Dam RM. Fast and accurate liver volumetry prior to hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:764-72. [PMID: 27593594 PMCID: PMC5011086 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Volumetric assessment of the liver is essential in the prevention of postresectional liver failure after partial hepatectomy. Currently used methods are accurate but time-consuming. This study aimed to test a new automated method for preoperative volumetric liver assessment. METHODS Patients who underwent a contrast enhanced portovenous phase CT-scan prior to hepatectomy in 2012 were included. Total liver volume (TLV) and future remnant liver volume (FRLV) were measured using TeraRecon Aquarius iNtuition(®) (autosegmentation) and OsiriX(®) (manual segmentation) software by two observers for each software package. Remnant liver volume percentage (RLV%) was calculated. Time needed to determine TLV and FRLV was measured. Inter-observer variability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were included. There were no significant differences in measured volumes between OsiriX(®) and iNtuition(®). Moreover, there were significant correlations between the OsiriX(®) observers, the iNtuition(®) observers and between OsiriX(®) and iNtuition(®) post-processing systems (all R(2) > 0.97). The median time needed for complete liver volumetric analysis was 18.4 ± 4.9 min with OsiriX(®) and 5.8 ± 1.7 min using iNtuition(®) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Both OsiriX(®) and iNtuition(®) liver volumetry are accurate and easily applicable. However, volumetric assessment of the liver with iNtuition(®) auto-segmentation is three times faster compared to manual OsiriX(®) volumetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toine M. Lodewick
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center & NUTRIM School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Division of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Aachen, Germany,Correspondence Toine M. Lodewick, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 43 3881547, +31 43 3875473.Department of SurgeryMaastricht UniversityPO Box 616Maastricht6200 MDThe Netherlands
| | | | - Max J. Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim M.C. van Mierlo
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center & NUTRIM School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P. Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center & NUTRIM School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Division of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Aachen, Germany
| | - Regina G. Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H.C. Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center & NUTRIM School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Division of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ronald M. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center & NUTRIM School of Nutrition & Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Division of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Heijnen LA, Lambregts DMJ, Lahaye MJ, Martens MH, van Nijnatten TJA, Rao SX, Riedl RG, Buijsen J, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH. Good and complete responding locally advanced rectal tumors after chemoradiotherapy: where are the residual positive nodes located on restaging MRI? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:1245-52. [PMID: 26814499 PMCID: PMC4912594 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0640-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of persistent mesorectal lymph node metastases on restaging MRI in patients with a good or complete response of their primary tumor (ypT0-2) after CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS Two hundred and twenty eight locally advanced rectal cancer patients underwent CRT, which resulted in a good response (downstaging to yT0-2) in 144 patients. Forty-nine patients were excluded (no surgery/insufficient follow-up or lacking lesion-by-lesion histology results). This resulted in a final study group of 95 yT0-2 patients. For the patients with a yN(+)-status, a detailed lesion-by-lesion comparison between restaging MRI and histology was performed to evaluate the characteristics and distribution of the individual N(+)-nodes. RESULTS 7/95 patients (7%) had a yT0-2N(+) status (11/880 (1%) N(+) nodes): no N(+) were found below the tumor level, 55% of the N(+) nodes were located at the level of the tumor, and 45% proximal to the tumor (at a median distance of 1.4 cm above the tumor level). In axial plane, 82% of the nodes were located at the ipsilateral circumference of the tumor, at a median distance of 0.9 cm from the tumor/rectal wall. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of persistent metastatic mesorectal nodes after CRT in patients with a good tumor response after CRT is very low. No N(+) nodes are found below the tumor level. All N(+) nodes are located at the level of or proximal to the primary tumor, of which the majority very close to the tumor/lumen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc A Heijnen
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Milou H Martens
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sheng-Xiang Rao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert G Riedl
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Buijsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lahaye MJ, Lambregts DMJ, Mutsaers E, Essers BAB, Breukink S, Cappendijk VC, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH. Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:1464-70. [PMID: 25591748 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3531-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether mandatory imaging is an effective strategy in suspected appendicitis for reducing unnecessary surgery and costs. METHODS In 2010, guidelines were implemented in The Netherlands recommending the mandatory use of preoperative imaging to confirm/refute clinically suspected appendicitis. This retrospective study included 1,556 consecutive patients with clinically suspected appendicitis in 2008-2009 (756 patients/group I) and 2011-2012 (800 patients/group II). Imaging use (none/US/CT and/or MRI) was recorded. Additional parameters were: complications, medical costs, surgical and histopathological findings. The primary study endpoint was the number of unnecessary surgeries before and after guideline implementation. RESULTS After clinical examination by a surgeon, 509/756 patients in group I and 540/800 patients in group II were still suspected of having appendicitis. In group I, 58.5% received preoperative imaging (42% US/12.8% CT/3.7% both), compared with 98.7% after the guidelines (61.6% US/4.4% CT/ 32.6% both). The percentage of unnecessary surgeries before the guidelines was 22.9%. After implementation, it dropped significantly to 6.2% (p<0.001). The surgical complication rate dropped from 19.9% to 14.2%. The average cost-per-patient decreased by 594 <euro> from 2,482 to 1,888 <euro> (CL:-1081; -143). CONCLUSION Increased use of imaging in the diagnostic work-up of patients with clinically suspected appendicitis reduced the rate of negative appendectomies, surgical complications and costs. KEY POINTS • The 2010 Dutch guidelines recommend mandatory imaging in the work-up of appendicitis. • This led to a considerable increase in the use of preoperative imaging. • Mandatory imaging led to reduction in unnecessary surgeries and surgical complications. • Use of mandatory imaging seems to reduce health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Heijnen LA, Maas M, Lahaye MJ, Lalji U, Lambregts DMJ, Martens MH, Riedl RG, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH. Value of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI and multiplanar reformatting for selecting good responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:1845-52. [PMID: 24898096 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3231-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2013] [Revised: 04/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to evaluate diagnostic performance of gadofosveset T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T1W MRI) for discriminating between ypT0-2 and ypT3-4 tumours after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer compared with T2W MRI for a general and expert reader. Second objectives included assessing the value of multiplanar reformatting (MPR) and interobserver agreement. METHODS A general and expert reader evaluated 49 patients for likelihood of ypT0-2 tumour after CRT on T2W, gadofosveset T1W MRI, and gadofosveset T1W MRI + T2W MRI. The general reader scored with and without MPR. Confidence level scores were used to construct receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Area under the curve (AUC) values and diagnostic parameters were calculated and compared. RESULTS Gadofosveset T1W MRI + T2W MRI showed slightly superior sensitivity than T2W MRI for the general but not the expert reader. Specificity was higher for the expert on gadofosveset T1W MRI only compared with T2W MRI only (100% vs. 82%). MPR did not increase diagnostic performance. Interobserver agreement was highest for the combination of gadofosveset-enhanced T1W imaging plus T2W MRI. CONCLUSIONS The sole use or addition of gadofosveset-enhanced T1W MRI to T2W MRI did not increase significantly diagnostic performance for assessing ypT0-2 tumours. Adding gadofosveset-enhanced T1W MRI slightly increased sensitivity for the general reader and specificity for the expert reader, but this increase was not significant for more accurate clinical decision making. MPR did not improve diagnostic performance. KEY POINTS • ycT restaging with MRI in rectal cancer is challenging. • Gadofosveset-enhanced T1W MRI has shown promise for nodal restaging. • Gadofosveset-enhanced T1W MRI did not significantly increase diagnostic performance for assessing ypT0-2-tumours. • Addition of the gadofosveset sequence to T2W MRI slightly increased sensitivity for the general reader. • MPR did not improve diagnostic performance of ycT staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc A Heijnen
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Arnoldussen CWKP, Strijkers RHW, Lambregts DMJ, Lahaye MJ, de Graaf R, Wittens CHA. Feasibility of identifying deep vein thrombosis characteristics with contrast enhanced MR-Venography. Phlebology 2014; 29:119-124. [DOI: 10.1177/0268355514529697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the feasibility of identifying deep vein thrombosis characteristics with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance venography. Materials and Methods A total of 53 cases of deep vein thrombosis extending in and/or above the common femoral vein were evaluated by 4 independent observers (2 expert, 2 novice) using pre-determined characteristics to determine the thrombosis present to be acute, sub-acute or old. If present, chronic remnants of a previous deep vein thrombosis were reported. Additionally these image qualifications were compared to the reported duration of complaints. Results In all cases all observers were able to qualify the thrombosis. The interobserver agreement between the experts was excellent (kappa 0.97) and good between expert and novice (kappa 0.82). Thrombosis identified as acute had an average duration of complaints of 6,5 (2–13) days, sub‐acute 13 (8–18) days and old 22 (15–32) days. Conclusion Qualification of thrombosis as acute, sub-acute or old and identification of chronic remnants of DVT with CE-MRV using routinely identifiable characteristics is feasible and reproducible with good to excellent interobserver agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CWKP Arnoldussen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Viecuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - RHW Strijkers
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - DMJ Lambregts
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - MJ Lahaye
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - R de Graaf
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - CHA Wittens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Uniklinik, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Engelen SME, Maas M, Lahaye MJ, Leijtens JWA, van Berlo CLH, Jansen RLH, Breukink SO, Dejong CHC, van de Velde CJH, Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL. Modern multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer based on staging with magnetic resonance imaging leads to excellent local control, but distant control remains a challenge. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49:2311-20. [PMID: 23571146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2012] [Revised: 02/01/2013] [Accepted: 03/03/2013] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this multicenter cohort study was to evaluate whether a differentiated treatment of primary rectal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reduce the number of incomplete resections and local recurrences and improve recurrence-free and overall survival. METHODS From February 2003 until January 2008, 296 patients with rectal cancer underwent preoperative MRI using a lymph node specific contrast agent to predict circumferential resection margin (CRM), T- and N-stage. Based on expert reading of the MRI, patients were stratified in: (a) low risk for local recurrence (CRM>2mm and N0 status), (b) intermediate risk and (c) high risk (close/involved CRM, N2 status or distal tumours). Mainly based on this MRI risk assessment patients were treated with (a) surgery only (TME or local excision), (b) preoperative 5 × 5 Gy+TME and (c) a long course of chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery after a 6-8 week interval. RESULTS Overall 228 patients underwent treatment with curative intent: 49 with surgery only, 86 with 5 × 5 Gy and surgery and 93 with chemoradiation and surgery. The number of complete resections (margin>1mm) was 218 (95.6%). At a median follow-up of 41 months the three-year local recurrence rate, disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate is 2.2%, 80% and 84.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION With a differentiated multimodality treatment based on dedicated preoperative MR imaging, local recurrence is no longer the main problem in rectal cancer treatment. The new challenges are early diagnosis and treatment, reducing morbidity of treatment and preferably prevention of metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M E Engelen
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Maas M, Lambregts DMJ, Lahaye MJ, Beets GL, Backes W, Vliegen RFA, Osinga-de Jong M, Wildberger JE, Beets-Tan RGH. T-staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3.0 Tesla MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 37:475-81. [PMID: 21674192 PMCID: PMC3345180 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9770-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not accurate in discriminating T1-2 from borderline T3 rectal tumors. Higher resolution on 3 Tesla-(3T)-MRI could improve diagnostic performance for T-staging. The aim of this study was to determine whether 3T-MRI compared with 1.5 Tesla-(1.5T)-MRI improves the accuracy for the discrimination between T1-2 and borderline T3 rectal tumors and to evaluate reproducibility. Methods 13 patients with non-locally advanced rectal cancer underwent imaging with both 1.5T and 3T-MRI. Three readers with different expertise evaluated the images and predicted T-stage with a confidence level score. Receiver operator characteristics curves with areas under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic parameters were calculated. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated with quadratic kappa-weighting. Histology was the reference standard. Results Seven patients had pT1-2 tumors and six had pT3 tumors. AUCs ranged from 0.66 to 0.87 at 1.5T vs. 0.52–0.82 at 3T. Mean overstaging rate was 43% at 1.5T and 57% at 3T (P = 0.23). Inter-observer agreement was κ 0.50–0.71 at 1.5T vs. 0.15–0.68 at 3T. Intra-observer agreement was κ 0.71 at 1.5T and 0.76 at 3T. Conclusions This is the first study to compare 3T with 1.5T MRI for T-staging of rectal cancer within the same patients. Our results showed no difference between 3T and 1.5T-MRI for the distinction between T1-2 and borderline T3 tumors, regardless of expertise. The higher resolution at 3T-MRI did not aid in the distinction between desmoplasia in T1-2-tumors and tumor stranding in T3-tumors. Larger studies are needed to acknowledge these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Doenja M. J. Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max J. Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L. Beets
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Walter Backes
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roy F. A. Vliegen
- Department of Radiology, Atrium Medical Center, Postbus 4446, 6401 CX Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Osinga-de Jong
- Department of Radiology, Orbis Medical Center, Postbus 5500, 6130 MB Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim E. Wildberger
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Postbus 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lobbes MBI, Cleutjens JPM, Lima Passos V, Frotscher C, Lahaye MJ, Keymeulen KBMI, Beets-Tan RG, Wildberger J, Boetes C. Density is in the eye of the beholder: visual versus semi-automated assessment of breast density on standard mammograms. Insights Imaging 2012; 3:91-9. [PMID: 22696002 PMCID: PMC3292640 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-011-0139-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2011] [Accepted: 10/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Visual inspection is generally used to assess breast density. Our study aim was to compare visual assessment of breast density of experienced and inexperienced readers with semi-automated analysis of breast density. METHODS Breast density was assessed by an experienced and an inexperienced reader in 200 mammograms and scored according to the quantitative BI-RADS classification. Breast density was also assessed by dedicated software using a semi-automated thresholding technique. Agreement between breast density classification of both readers as well as agreement between their assessment versus the semi-automated analysis as reference standard was expressed as the weighted kappa value. RESULTS Using the semi-automated analysis, agreement between breast density measurements of both breasts in both projections was excellent (ICC >0.9, P < 0.0001). Reproducibility of the semi-automated analysis was excellent (ICC >0.8, P < 0.0001). The experienced reader correctly classified the BI-RADS breast density classification in 58.5% of the cases. Classification was overestimated in 35.5% of the cases and underestimated in 6.0% of the cases. Results of the inexperienced reader were less accurate. Agreement between the classification of both readers versus the semi-automated analysis was considered only moderate with weighted kappa values of 0.367 (experienced reader) and 0.232 (inexperienced reader). CONCLUSION Visual assessment of breast density on mammograms is inaccurate and observer-dependent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O.Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|