1
|
Foley KG, Lahaye MJ, Thoeni RF, Soltes M, Dewhurst C, Barbu ST, Vashist YK, Rafaelsen SR, Arvanitakis M, Perinel J, Wiles R, Roberts SA. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:3358-3368. [PMID: 34918177 PMCID: PMC9038818 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Main recommendations Primary investigation of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder should be with abdominal ultrasound. Routine use of other imaging modalities is not recommended presently, but further research is needed. In centres with appropriate expertise and resources, alternative imaging modalities (such as contrast-enhanced and endoscopic ultrasound) may be useful to aid decision-making in difficult cases. Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. Cholecystectomy is recommended in patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder measuring 10 mm or more, providing the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to assess perceived individual risk of malignancy. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. Cholecystectomy is suggested for patients with a polypoid lesion and symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder if no alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms is demonstrated and the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. The patient should be counselled regarding the benefit of cholecystectomy versus the risk of persistent symptoms. Strong recommendation, low-quality evidence. If the patient has a 6–9 mm polypoid lesion of the gallbladder and one or more risk factors for malignancy, cholecystectomy is recommended if the patient is fit for, and accepts, surgery. These risk factors are as follows: age more than 60 years, history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), Asian ethnicity, sessile polypoid lesion (including focal gallbladder wall thickening > 4 mm). Strong recommendation, low–moderate quality evidence. If the patient has either no risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 6–9 mm, or risk factors for malignancy and a gallbladder polypoid lesion 5 mm or less, follow-up ultrasound of the gallbladder is recommended at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. Follow-up should be discontinued after 2 years in the absence of growth. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If the patient has no risk factors for malignancy, and a gallbladder polypoid lesion of 5 mm or less, follow-up is not required. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion grows to 10 mm, then cholecystectomy is advised. If the polypoid lesion grows by 2 mm or more within the 2-year follow-up period, then the current size of the polypoid lesion should be considered along with patient risk factors. Multidisciplinary discussion may be employed to decide whether continuation of monitoring, or cholecystectomy, is necessary. Moderate strength recommendation, moderate-quality evidence. If during follow-up the gallbladder polypoid lesion disappears, then monitoring can be discontinued. Strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence.
Source and scope These guidelines are an update of the 2017 recommendations developed between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery–European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A targeted literature search was performed to discover recent evidence concerning the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. The changes within these updated guidelines were formulated after consideration of the latest evidence by a group of international experts. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Key Point • These recommendations update the 2017 European guidelines regarding the management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran G Foley
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK.
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruedi F Thoeni
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco Medical School, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marek Soltes
- 1st Department of Surgery LF UPJS a UNLP, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Catherine Dewhurst
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- 4th Surgery Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Yogesh K Vashist
- Clinics of Surgery, Department General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Goslar, Germany
| | - Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Cancer Centre, Vejle Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Rebecca Wiles
- Department of Radiology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Partelli S, Sclafani F, Barbu ST, Beishon M, Bonomo P, Braz G, de Braud F, Brunner T, Cavestro GM, Crul M, Trill MD, Ferollà P, Herrmann K, Karamitopoulou E, Neuzillet C, Orsi F, Seppänen H, Torchio M, Valenti D, Zamboni G, Zins M, Costa A, Poortmans P. European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102208. [PMID: 34238640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) are written by experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care in Europe. They give patients, health professionals, managers and policymakers a guide to essential care throughout the patient journey. Pancreatic cancer is an increasing cause of cancer mortality and has wide variation in treatment and care in Europe. It is a major healthcare burden and has complex diagnosis and treatment challenges. Care must be carried out only in pancreatic cancer units or centres that have a core multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an extended team of health professionals detailed here. Such units are far from universal in European countries. To meet European aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Partelli
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO); IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Sclafani
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- Pancreatic Cancer Europe (PCE); Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Marc Beishon
- Cancer World, European School of Oncology (ESO), Milan, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Flims Alumni Club (FAC); Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Graça Braz
- European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS); Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Brunner
- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO); Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Giulia Martina Cavestro
- European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG); IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirjam Crul
- European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP); Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Netherlands
| | - Maria Die Trill
- International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS); ATRIUM: Psycho-Oncology & Clinical Psychology, Madrid, Spain
| | - Piero Ferollà
- International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance (INCA); Umbria Regional Cancer Network, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ken Herrmann
- European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM); University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva Karamitopoulou
- European Society of Pathology (ESP); Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Franco Orsi
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Hanna Seppänen
- Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL); Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martina Torchio
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Danila Valenti
- European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC); Palliative Care Network, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Zamboni
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI); University Hospital Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marc Zins
- European Society of Radiology (ESR); Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France
| | | | - Philip Poortmans
- European Cancer Organisation (ECCO); Iridium Kankernetwerk and University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wiles R, Thoeni RF, Barbu ST, Vashist YK, Rafaelsen SR, Dewhurst C, Arvanitakis M, Lahaye M, Soltes M, Perinel J, Roberts SA. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps : Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery - European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Eur Radiol 2017; 27:3856-3866. [PMID: 28185005 PMCID: PMC5544788 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4742-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2016] [Revised: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps on radiological examinations is contentious. The incidental radiological finding of a gallbladder polyp can therefore be problematic for the radiologist and the clinician who referred the patient for the radiological examination. To address this a joint guideline was created by the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery – European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Methods A targeted literature search was performed and consensus guidelines were created using a series of Delphi questionnaires and a seven-point Likert scale. Results A total of three Delphi rounds were performed. Consensus regarding which patients should have cholecystectomy, which patients should have ultrasound follow-up and the nature and duration of that follow-up was established. The full recommendations as well as a summary algorithm are provided. Conclusions These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidance when a gallbladder polyp is encountered in clinical practice. Key Points • Management of gallbladder polyps is contentious • Cholecystectomy is recommended for gallbladder polyps >10 mm • Management of polyps <10 mm depends on patient and polyp characteristics • Further research is required to determine optimal management of gallbladder polyps
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Wiles
- Department of Radiology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, L78XP, UK.
| | - Ruedi F Thoeni
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- 4th Surgery Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Yogesh K Vashist
- Section for Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.,Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Søren Rafael Rafaelsen
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Cancer Centre, Vejle Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Catherine Dewhurst
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Max Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marek Soltes
- 1st Department of Surgery LF UPJS a UNLP, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zarnescu NO, Barbu ST, Zarnescu Vasiliu EC, Costea R, Neagu S. Management of Acute Pancreatitis in the Early Stage. Maedica (Bucur) 2015; 10:257-263. [PMID: 28261363 PMCID: PMC5327838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potential fatal disease with an overall mortality around 5%. The current treatment for AP relies on supportive medical therapy, sometimes associated with endoscopic procedures and/or surgical interventions. In this review we discuss the recent concepts regarding the fluid therapy, pain management, antibiotic prophylaxis, apheresis for hypertriglyceridemia-induced AP, timing and indications for ERCP and cholecystectomy in biliary AP. For each component, the importance and the impact of early phase treatment is presented in terms of benefits and risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sorin Traian Barbu
- 4th Department of Surgery, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Radu Costea
- Second Department of Surgery, Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Stefan Neagu
- Second Department of Surgery, Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dumitraşcu T, Barbu ST, Ionescu M, Popescu I. POSSUM, a potentially useful tool for prediction of morbidity in patients undergoing central pancreatectomy. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2012; 107:447-453. [PMID: 23025110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
AIM Central pancreatectomy is a pancreas-sparing alternative to standard pancreatic resections, and it is associated with substantial morbidity. The aim of the present study is to assess the utility of the POSSUM scoring system in the prediction of the postoperative complications after central pancreatectomy, which would help identify the patients who are at the highest risk of developing complications. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 24 patients who underwent central pancreatectomies (2002-2010) was performed. The POSSUM score was calculated for each patient and was correlated with observed morbidity. RESULTS The mean POSSUM score was 32, thus predicting morbidity in 9 out of 24 patients. This risk assessment proved to be quite accurate, as 13 patients (54%) actually developed postoperative complications (chi-squared = 3.2101, p = 0.073). The predictive value of the POSSUM was strongest for the < or = 20%, 60-80% and > or = 80% morbidity risk cohorts (O/E ratio 1). CONCLUSIONS The identification of a scoring system to predict the development of severe complications after central pancreatectomy may stratify the patients' risk and lead to a tailored approach of this surgical procedure. Although POSSUM seems to predict morbidity after central pancreatectomy, further studies involving larger numbers of patients should be conducted to confirm this effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Dumitraşcu
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Florea M, Barbu ST, Crisan M, Silaghi H, Butnaru A, Lupsor M. Spontaneous external fistula of a hydatid liver cyst in a diabetic patient. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2008; 103:695-698. [PMID: 19274917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The liver is the most common site of hydatid disease. Complications like cyst rupture and infection may occur, sites of rupture including: bile ducts, gastrointestinal tract, bronchi, peritoneal and pleural cavity. Rupture into the subcutaneous tissue followed by external fistula is an extremely rare complication. CASE REPORT A 71-year-old diabetic woman was referred for a progressive growing mass in the right hypochondrium, with a central fistula draining clear liquid with cystic elements and white membranes. No history of fever or jaundice was present. Abdominal ultrasound (followed by CT scan) revealed a liver hydatid cyst in the right lobe, in contact with the anterior abdominal wall, and a parietal fistula track. Cystic fluid exam showed protoscolices and serological ELISA test was positive for hydatid disease. At surgery, the lesion was approached through an incision starting from the fistula site. Partial cystectomy and external drainage of the residual cavity were performed. The fistula track was totally resected. After an uneventful recovery and six months of anti - parasitic treatment, the patient is symptoms- free (3 years after surgery). CONCLUSIONS Spontaneous cyst-cutaneous fistula is an extremely rare complication of hydatid liver cyst, usually occurring silently, in elder people. Surgery is required to achieve complete evacuation of the cyst contents and resolution of the residual cavity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the seventh case published, and the first one in the Romanian literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Florea
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barbu ST, Vlad C, Cazacu M. [Natural history of alcoholic chronic pancreatitis in north-western Romania]. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2008; 112:662-668. [PMID: 20201249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
AIM To describe the natural history of alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP) patients form north-western Romania. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis and a subsequent prospective follow-up (mean = 7.3 years) of 99 patients with ACP. Average duration of ACP was 15.6 years. RESULTS Patients were mostly men (93%), with a mean age of 42.9 years at the time of operation and 35.7 years at the disease onset. Indications for surgery were: intractable pain (12%), complications (83%) and suspicion of malignancy (5%). During the evolution, 35 patients needed two to four surgical procedures. Calcifications developed in 63.6% of patients, steatorrhea in 41.4% and secondary diabetes in 43.4%. CONCLUSION ACP in north-western Romania is characterized by early onset of the disease and a severe evolution with multiple complications needing repeated surgery. The "burnout" of the disease, with calcifications, secondary diabetes and marked exocrine insufficiency leads to lasting pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S T Barbu
- Facultatea de Medicină, Clinica Chirurgicală IV, Universitatea de Medicină si Farmacie "I. Haţieganu" Cluj-Napoca
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barbu ST, Rednic N, Cazacu M. [Ultrasound guided percutaneous drainage in the treatment of local septic complications of chronic pancreatitis]. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2008; 112:119-125. [PMID: 18677915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate results of ultrasound guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for local septic complications of chronic pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHOD Between 1999 and 2002, PCD was used in 19 patients with chronic pancreatitis for 6 infected acute pseudocysts, 3 post-necrotic abscesses, 3 abscesses following pancreatic resections, 6 abscesses with none of the precipitating factors present (no acute episode or recent surgical/endoscopic interventions) and a tuberculous peritoneal empyema. In 17 patients, collections were unilocular. RESULTS Trocar technique was used in 14 patients and Seldinger technique in 5. Sixteen patients were successfully treated with PCD alone (mean drainage duration = 32 days) without abscess recurrence during the follow-up period (mean = 35.6 month). Surgical treatment was necessary in 3 patients. Pseudocyst recurrence occurred in another patient after 9 months. CONCLUSION PCD should be considered as the initial therapy for chronic pancreatitis local septic complications. Surgery is reserved for patients in whom PCD fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S T Barbu
- Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie I. Haţieganu Cluj-Napoca, Facultatea de Medicină, Clinica Chirurgicală IV
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barbu ST, Zărnescu NO, Andrén-Sandberg T. [Report from the 37th annual meeting of the "European Pancreatic Club." Graz, Austria, 6-8 July 2005]. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2006; 101:209-11. [PMID: 16752690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S T Barbu
- Clinica Chirurgie IV, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca
| | | | | |
Collapse
|