1
|
Spiekman IAC, Geurts BS, Zeverijn LJ, de Wit GF, van der Noort V, Roepman P, de Leng WWJ, Jansen AML, Kusters B, Beerepoot LV, de Vos FYFL, de Groot DJA, de Groot JWB, Hoeben A, Buter J, Gelderblom HAJ, Voest EE, Verheul HMW. Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab in Patients With RAF/RAS-Wild-Type Glioblastoma: Results From the Drug Rediscovery Protocol. Oncologist 2024; 29:431-440. [PMID: 38109296 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of malignant primary high-grade brain tumors, predominantly glioblastomas, is poor despite intensive multimodality treatment options. In more than 50% of patients with glioblastomas, potentially targetable mutations are present, including rearrangements, altered splicing, and/or focal amplifications of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by signaling through the RAF/RAS pathway. We studied whether treatment with the clinically available anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab provides clinical benefit for patients with RAF/RAS-wild-type (wt) glioblastomas in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). METHODS Patients with progression of treatment refractory RAF/RASwt glioblastoma were included for treatment with panitumumab in DRUP when measurable according to RANO criteria. The primary endpoints of this study are clinical benefit (CB: defined as confirmed objective response [OR] or stable disease [SD] ≥ 16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon-like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1 and up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1 in 8 patients had CB in stage 1. RESULTS Between 03-2018 and 02-2022, 24 evaluable patients were treated. CB was observed in 5 patients (21%), including 2 patients with partial response (8.3%) and 3 patients with SD ≥ 16 weeks (12.5%). After median follow-up of 15 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 1.7 months (95% CI 1.6-2.1 months) and 4.5 months (95% CI 2.9-8.6 months), respectively. No unexpected toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS Panitumumab treatment provides limited CB in patients with recurrent RAF/RASwt glioblastoma precluding further development of this therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse A C Spiekman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit S Geurts
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurien J Zeverijn
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs F de Wit
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Benno Kusters
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Laurens V Beerepoot
- Department of Internal Medicine, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Filip Y F L de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Derk-Jan A de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ann Hoeben
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW School of Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Buter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VuMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans A J Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam,The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vreeburg MTA, de Vries HM, van der Noort V, Horenblas S, van Rhijn BWG, Hendricksen K, Graafland N, van der Poel HG, Brouwer OR. Penile cancer care in the Netherlands: increased incidence, centralisation, and improved survival. BJU Int 2024; 133:596-603. [PMID: 38403729 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) incidence and centralisation trends in the Netherlands over the past three decades, as well as the effect of centralisation of PSCC care on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the Netherlands PSCC care is largely centralised in one national centre of expertise (Netherlands Cancer Institute [NCI], Amsterdam). For this study, the Netherlands Cancer Registry, an independent nationwide cancer registry, provided per-patient data on age, clinical and pathological tumour staging, follow-up, and vital status. Patients with treatment at the NCI were identified and compared to patients who were treated at all other centres. The age-standardised incidence rate was calculated with the European Standard Population. The probability of death due to PSCC was estimated using the relative survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of survival. RESULTS A total of 3160 patients were diagnosed with PSCC between 1990 and 2020, showing a rising incidence (P < 0.001). Annual caseload increased at the NCI (1% in 1990, 65% in 2020) and decreased at other (regional) centres (99% to 35%). Despite a relatively high percentage of patients with T2-4 (64%) and N+ (33%) at the NCI, the 5-year relative survival was higher (86%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 82-91%) compared to regional centres (76%, 95% CI 73-80%, P < 0.001). Patients with a pathological T2 tumour were treated with glans-sparing treatment more often at the reference centre than at the regional centres (16% vs 5.0%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, histological grading, T-stage, presence of lymph node involvement and year of diagnosis, treatment at regional centres remained a predictor for worse survival (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.39; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION The incidence of PSCC in the Netherlands has been gradually increasing over the past three decades, with a noticeable trend towards centralisation of PSCC care and improved relative survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon T A Vreeburg
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hielke-Martijn de Vries
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels Graafland
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spiekman IAC, Zeverijn LJ, Geurts BS, Verkerk K, Haj Mohammad SF, van der Noort V, Roepman P, de Leng WWJ, Jansen AML, Gootjes EC, de Groot DJA, Kerver ED, van Voorthuizen T, Roodhart JML, Valkenburg-van Iersel LBJ, Gelderblom H, Voest EE, Verheul HMW. Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab for HER2-amplified advanced colorectal cancer: Results from the drug rediscovery protocol (DRUP). Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:113988. [PMID: 38471288 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2-5% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) is amplified or overexpressed. Despite prior evidence that anti-HER2 therapy confers clinical benefit (CB) in one-third of these patients, it is not approved for this indication in Europe. In the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients are treated with off-label drugs based on their molecular profile. Here, we present the results of the cohort 'trastuzumab/pertuzumab for treatment-refractory patients with RAS/BRAF-wild-type HER2amplified metastatic CRC (HER2+mCRC)'. METHODS Patients with progressive treatment-refractory RAS/BRAF-wild-type HER2+mCRC with measurable disease were included for trastuzumab plus pertuzumab treatment. Primary endpoints of DRUP are CB (defined as confirmed objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) ≥ 16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon-like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1 and 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB. To identify biomarkers for response, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on pre-treatment biopsies. RESULTS CB was observed in 11/24 evaluable patients (46%) with HER2+mCRC, seven patients achieved an OR (29%). Median duration of response was 8.4 months. Patients had undergone a median of 3 prior treatment lines. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 months (95% CI 1.9-10.3) and 8.2 months (95% CI 7.2-14.7), respectively. No unexpected toxicities were observed. WGS provided potential explanations for resistance in 3/10 patients without CB, for whom WGS was available. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confirm a clinically significant benefit of trastuzumab plus pertuzumab treatment in patients with HER2+mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse A C Spiekman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien J Zeverijn
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit S Geurts
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karlijn Verkerk
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Soemeya F Haj Mohammad
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Elske C Gootjes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Derk-Jan A de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Emile D Kerver
- Department of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Liselot B J Valkenburg-van Iersel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW school of Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geurts BS, Zeverijn LJ, Leek LVM, van Berge Henegouwen JM, Hoes LR, van der Wijngaart H, van der Noort V, van de Haar J, van Ommen-Nijhof A, Kok M, Roepman P, Jansen AML, de Leng WWJ, de Jonge MJA, Hoeben A, van Herpen CML, Westgeest HM, Wessels LFA, Verheul HMW, Gelderblom H, Voest EE. Efficacy of pembrolizumab and biomarker analysis in patients with WGS-based intermediate to high tumor mutational load: results from the Drug Rediscovery Protocol. Clin Cancer Res 2024:743079. [PMID: 38630551 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate efficacy of pembrolizumab across multiple cancer types harboring different levels of Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS)-based tumor mutational load (TML; total of non-synonymous mutations across the genome) in patients included in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (NCT02925234). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with solid, treatment-refractory, microsatellite-stable tumors were enrolled in cohort A: breast cancer TML 140-290, cohort B: tumor-agnostic cohort TML 140-290, and cohort C: tumor-agnostic cohort TML >290. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every three weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (CB: objective response or stable disease (SD) ≥16 weeks). Pre-treatment tumor biopsies were obtained for WGS and RNA-sequencing. RESULTS Seventy-two evaluable patients with 26 different histotypes were enrolled. CB rate was 13% in cohort A (3/24 with partial response (PR)), 21% in cohort B (3/24 with SD, 2/24 with PR), and 42% in cohort C (4/24 with SD, 6/24 with PR). In cohort C, neoantigen burden estimates and expression of inflammation and innate immune biomarkers were significantly associated with CB. Similar associations were not identified in cohort A and B. In cohort A, CB was significantly associated with mutations in the chromatin remodeling gene PBRM1, while in cohort B, CB was significantly associated with expression of MICA/MICB and butyrophilins. CB and clonal TML were not significantly associated. CONCLUSION While in cohort A pembrolizumab lacked activity, cohort B and cohort C met the study's primary endpoint. Further research is warranted to refine selection of patients with tumors harboring lower TMLs and may benefit from a focus on innate immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Louisa R Hoes
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joris van de Haar
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | - Marleen Kok
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ann Hoeben
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Emile E Voest
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Ruiter JC, van der Noort V, van Diessen JNA, Smit EF, Damhuis RAM, Hartemink KJ. The optimal treatment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer: minimally invasive lobectomy versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy - a nationwide cohort study. Lung Cancer 2024; 191:107792. [PMID: 38621343 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the Early-Stage LUNG cancer (ESLUNG) study was to compare outcomes after minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL) and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (according to TNM7), treated in 2014-2016 with MIL or SABR, were included. 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated and compared between patients treated with MIL and a propensity score (PS)-weighted SABR population with characteristics comparable to those of the MIL group. RESULTS 1211 MIL and 972 SABR patients were included. Nodal upstaging occurred in 13.0 % of operated patients. 30-day mortality was 1.0 % after MIL and 0.2 % after SABR. After SABR, the 5-year regional recurrence rate (18.1 versus 14.2 %; HR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.58-0.94) and distant metastasis rate (26.2 versus 20.2 %; HR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.59-0.88) were significantly higher than after MIL, with similar local recurrence rate (13.1 versus 12.1 %; HR 0.90, 95 % CI 0.68-1.19). Unadjusted 5-year OS and RFS were 70.2 versus 40.3 % and 58.0 versus 25.1 % after MIL and SABR, respectively. PS-weighted, multivariable analyses showed no significant difference in OS (HR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.65-1.20) and better RFS after MIL (HR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.49-0.99). CONCLUSION OS was not significantly different between stage I NSCLC patients treated with MIL and the PS-weighted population of patients treated with SABR. For operable patients with stage I NSCLC, SABR could therefore be an alternative treatment option with comparable OS outcome. However, RFS was better after MIL due to fewer regional recurrences and distant metastases. Future studies should focus on optimization of patient selection for MIL or SABR to further reduce postoperative mortality and morbidity after MIL and nodal failures after SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julianne Cynthia de Ruiter
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judi Nani Annet van Diessen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Egbert Frederik Smit
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald Alphons Maria Damhuis
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koen Johan Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Verkerk K, Geurts BS, Zeverijn LJ, van der Noort V, Verheul HM, Haanen JB, van der Veldt AA, Eskens FA, Aarts MJ, van Herpen CM, Jalving M, Gietema JA, Devriese LA, Labots M, Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Smit EF, Bloemendal HJ. Cemiplimab in locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: prospective real-world data from the DRUG Access Protocol. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024; 39:100875. [PMID: 38464480 PMCID: PMC10924203 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Background The DRUG Access Protocol provides patients with cancer access to registered anti-cancer drugs that are awaiting reimbursement in the Netherlands and simultaneously collects prospective real-world data (RWD). Here, we present RWD from PD-1 blocker cemiplimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (laCSCC; mCSCC). Methods Patients with laCSCC or mCSCC received cemiplimab 350 mg fixed dose every three weeks. Primary endpoints were objective clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) at 16 weeks, physician-assessed CBR, defined as clinician's documentation of improved disease or SD based on evaluation of all available clinical parameters at 16 weeks, objective response rate (ORR), and safety, defined as grade ≥ 3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) occurring up to 30 days after last drug administration. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Findings Between February 2021 and December 2022, 151 patients started treatment. Objective and physician-assessed CBR were 54.3% (95% CI, 46.0-62.4) and 59.6% (95% CI, 51.3-67.5), respectively. ORR was 35.1% (95% CI, 27.5-43.3). After a median follow-up of 15.2 months, median DoR was not reached. Median PFS and OS were 12.2 (95% CI, 7.0-not reached) and 24.2 months (95% CI, 18.8-not reached), respectively. Sixty-eight TRAEs occurred in 29.8% of patients. Most commonly reported TRAE was a kidney transplant rejection (9.5%). Interpretation Cemiplimab proved highly effective and safe in this real-world cohort of patients with laCSCC or mCSCC, confirming its therapeutic value in the treatment of advanced CSCC in daily clinical practice. Funding The DRUG Access Protocol is supported by all participating pharmaceutical companies: Bayer, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn Verkerk
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Birgit S. Geurts
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien J. Zeverijn
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Henk M.W. Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John B.A.G. Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Oncology, LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Head of Melanoma Clinic, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Astrid A.M. van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ferry A.L.M. Eskens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maureen J.B. Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla M.L. van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jourik A. Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lot A. Devriese
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division Beeld & Oncologie, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mariette Labots
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Egbert F. Smit
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Haiko J. Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muller M, Best MG, van der Noort V, Hiltermann TJN, Niemeijer ALN, Post E, Sol N, In 't Veld SGJG, Nogarede T, Visser L, Schouten RD, van den Broek D, Hummelink K, Monkhorst K, de Langen AJ, Schuuring E, Smit EF, Groen HJM, Wurdinger T, van den Heuvel MM. Blood platelet RNA profiles do not enable for nivolumab response prediction at baseline in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol 2024; 46:S327-S340. [PMID: 37270827 DOI: 10.3233/tub-220037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), though the response rates remain low. Pre-treatment response prediction may improve patient allocation for immunotherapy. Blood platelets act as active immune-like cells, thereby constraining T-cell activity, propagating cancer metastasis, and adjusting their spliced mRNA content. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether platelet RNA profiles before start of nivolumab anti-PD1 immunotherapy may predict treatment responses. METHODS We performed RNA-sequencing of platelet RNA samples isolated from stage III-IV NSCLC patients before treatment with nivolumab. Treatment response was scored by the RECIST-criteria. Data were analyzed using a predefined thromboSeq analysis including a particle-swarm-enhanced support vector machine (PSO/SVM) classification algorithm. RESULTS We collected and processed a 286-samples cohort, separated into a training/evaluation and validation series and subjected those to training of the PSO/SVM-classification algorithm. We observed only low classification accuracy in the 107-samples validation series (area under the curve (AUC) training series: 0.73 (95% -CI: 0.63-0.84, n = 88 samples), AUC evaluation series: 0.64 (95% -CI: 0.51-0.76, n = 91 samples), AUC validation series: 0.58 (95% -CI: 0.45-0.70, n = 107 samples)), employing a five-RNAs biomarker panel. CONCLUSIONS We concluded that platelet RNA may have minimally discriminative capacity for anti-PD1 nivolumab response prediction, with which the current methodology is insufficient for diagnostic application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte Muller
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Myron G Best
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam and Liquid Biopsy Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - T Jeroen N Hiltermann
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna-Larissa N Niemeijer
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edward Post
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam and Liquid Biopsy Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nik Sol
- Cancer Center Amsterdam and Liquid Biopsy Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjors G J G In 't Veld
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam and Liquid Biopsy Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke Nogarede
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne Visser
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam and Liquid Biopsy Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert D Schouten
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn Hummelink
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus J de Langen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Egbert F Smit
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wurdinger
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam and Liquid Biopsy Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel M van den Heuvel
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Buma S, van Klinken M, van der Noort V. A Targeted Discharge Pathway to Reduce Hospital Readmission and Dying in Hospital in Cancer Patients at the End of Life. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151506. [PMID: 37813728 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a need for better information exchange between primary and secondary care healthcare professionals in cancer patients with limited life expectancy, most of whom prefer to be at home but are admitted frequently at the end of life (EoL). We conducted a file search to assess this among our patients and developed a discharge pathway to decrease readmission rate and dying in hospital. DATA SOURCES We performed an in-depth file search among 150 patients who died within 1 month after hospital admission (July 2013 to January 2014); 60 were admitted once, and 90 were admitted twice or more. Mean time spent in hospital at EoL was 12 days; 37% died in hospital, and 49% died at home. We included 31 admitted cancer patients at the EoL in whom home-discharge was planned for the intervention (February 2017 to December 2018). Median survival was 24 days, time spent in hospital decreased from 15.5 to 2.5 days, and number of readmissions fell from 2.8 to 0.57. One patient (3.1%) died in hospital, and 77% died at home. And 78% of general practitioners found the provided information useful. CONCLUSION A proactive discharge pathway may reduce hospital readmission rates, time spent in hospital, and in-hospital death. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Ever more patients with complex care needs at the EoL are being discharged early. Being informed about patients' wishes, preferences, and treatment options for symptom management at home is essential for doctors and nurses in primary care. A systematic discharge pathway can be useful for information transfer when admitted patients are discharged home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Merel van Klinken
- Specialist nurse Palliative Care, MSc, Research Nurse. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Statistician PhD. Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Douma LAH, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, Monkhorst K, Smesseim I, Baas P, Schilder B, Vermeulen M, Burgers JA, de Gooijer CJ. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in second-line and third-line patients with pleural mesothelioma (PEMMELA): a single-arm phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1219-1228. [PMID: 37844598 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00446-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and lenvatinib, an antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor, shows synergistic activity in preclinical and clinical studies in solid tumours. We assessed the clinical activity of this combination therapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma who progressed after platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. METHODS In this single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study, done at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with pleural mesothelioma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progression after chemotherapy (no previous immunotherapy), and measurable disease according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (mRECIST) for mesothelioma version 1.1. Patients received 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab once every 3 weeks plus 20 mg oral lenvatinib once per day for up to 2 years or until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate identified by a local investigator according to mRECIST version 1.1. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04287829, and is recruiting for the second cohort. FINDINGS Between March 5, 2021, and Jan 31, 2022, 42 patients were screened, of whom 38 were included in the primary endpoint and safety analyses (median age 71 years [IQR 65-75], 33 [87%] male and five [13%] female) . At data cutoff (Jan 31, 2023), with a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 13·8-19·4), 22 (58%; 95% CI 41-74) of 38 patients had an objective response. The independent review showed an objective response in 17 (45%; 95% CI 29-62) of 38 patients. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in ten (26%) patients, including one treatment-related death due to myocardial infarction. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (eight patients [21%]) and anorexia and lymphopenia (both four patients [11%]). In 29 (76%) of 38 patients, at least one dose reduction or discontinuation of lenvatinib was required. INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed promising anti-tumour activity in patients with pleural mesothelioma with considerable toxicity, similar to that in previous studies. Available evidence from the literature suggests a high starting dose of lenvatinib for optimal anti-tumour activity. This, however, demands a high standard of supportive care. The combination therapy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib warrants further investigation in pleural mesothelioma. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Anne H Douma
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ferry Lalezari
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeltje F de Vries
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Illaa Smesseim
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bodien Schilder
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marrit Vermeulen
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zeverijn LJ, Looze EJ, Thavaneswaran S, van Berge Henegouwen JM, Simes RJ, Hoes LR, Sjoquist KM, van der Wijngaart H, Sebastian L, Geurts BS, Lee CK, de Wit GF, Espinoza D, Roepman P, Lin FP, Jansen AML, de Leng WWJ, van der Noort V, Leek LVM, de Vos FYFL, van Herpen CML, Gelderblom H, Verheul HMW, Thomas DM, Voest EE. Limited clinical activity of palbociclib and ribociclib monotherapy in advanced cancers with cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations in the Dutch DRUP and Australian MoST trials. Int J Cancer 2023; 153:1413-1422. [PMID: 37424386 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
The Dutch Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) and the Australian Cancer Molecular Screening and Therapeutic (MoST) Program are similar nonrandomized, multidrug, pan-cancer trial platforms that aim to identify signals of clinical activity of molecularly matched targeted therapies or immunotherapies outside their approved indications. Here, we report results for advanced or metastatic cancer patients with tumors harboring cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib or ribociclib. We included adult patients that had therapy-refractory solid malignancies with the following alterations: amplifications of CDK4, CDK6, CCND1, CCND2 or CCND3, or complete loss of CDKN2A or SMARCA4. Within MoST, all patients were treated with palbociclib, whereas in DRUP, palbociclib and ribociclib were assigned to different cohorts (defined by tumor type and alteration). The primary endpoint for this combined analysis was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed objective response or stable disease ≥16 weeks. We treated 139 patients with a broad variety of tumor types; 116 with palbociclib and 23 with ribociclib. In 112 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 0% and clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks was 15%. Median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI: 3-5 months), and median overall survival 5 months (95% CI: 4-6 months). In conclusion, only limited clinical activity of palbociclib and ribociclib monotherapy in patients with pretreated cancers harboring cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations was observed. Our findings indicate that monotherapy use of palbociclib or ribociclib is not recommended and that merging data of two similar precision oncology trials is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurien J Zeverijn
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora J Looze
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Subotheni Thavaneswaran
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J Maxime van Berge Henegouwen
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Simes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louisa R Hoes
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katrin M Sjoquist
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hanneke van der Wijngaart
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucille Sebastian
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Birgit S Geurts
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chee K Lee
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gijsbrecht F de Wit
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Espinoza
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Lin
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lindsay V M Leek
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Filip Y F L de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla M L van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David M Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emile E Voest
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ottenhof SR, de Vries HM, Doodeman B, Vrijenhoek GL, van der Noort V, Donswijk ML, de Feijter JM, Schaake EE, Horenblas S, Brouwer OR, van der Heijden MS, Pos FJ. A Prospective Study of Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Treatment in Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Penile Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:139-147. [PMID: 37030606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for locoregionally advanced penile carcinoma (LAPSCC) is associated with severe toxicity and a 1-year survival probability of ∼50%. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the primary treatment for LAPSCC and the association of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with the outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm study of CRT in LAPSCC, defined as a large/inoperable primary tumor, large palpable nodes, suspicion of extranodal extension or pelvic nodal involvement, and no distant metastases. CRT consisted of 49.5 Gy (33 × 1.5 Gy) on affected inguinal and pelvic areas combined with intravenous mitomycin C on day 1 and capecitabine on radiation days. Primary tumors and positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive deposits received a boost of 59.4 Gy (33 × 1.8 Gy). The response was evaluated by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. If feasible, patients with residual/recurrent disease underwent salvage surgery. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), reached when 1-year PFS was ≥50%. Other endpoints were 2-year PFS, overall survival, and toxicity rates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included: 29 (88%) with stage IV disease (T4 any-N M0 and/or any-T N3 M0) and 8 (24%) with hrHPV-positive disease. Median follow-up was 41 months. Thirty-two completed CRT. Eleven (33%) experienced ≥1 grade 3 treatment-related adverse event. There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events. Twenty-four patients (73%) responded, including 13 (39%) complete responses. Nine patients (27%) underwent salvage surgery, and an additional 8 patients underwent later surgery (together 52%). One- and 2-year PFS were 34% and 31%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival were 73% and 46%, respectively. No significant difference between patients with hrHPV-positive and -negative tumors was observed. CONCLUSIONS CRT is a viable treatment option for LAPSCC with acceptable toxicity. CRT can result in an enduring response. If patients have residual tumor, salvage surgery is feasible. HrHPV status was not associated with outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Barry Doodeman
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maarten Lucas Donswijk
- Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eva Eline Schaake
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Departments of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Floris Jop Pos
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Geurts BS, Battaglia TW, van Berge Henegouwen JM, Zeverijn LJ, de Wit GF, Hoes LR, van der Wijngaart H, van der Noort V, Roepman P, de Leng WWJ, Jansen AML, Opdam FL, de Jonge MJA, Cirkel GA, Labots M, Hoeben A, Kerver ED, Bins AD, Erdkamp FGL, van Rooijen JM, Houtsma D, Hendriks MP, de Groot JWB, Verheul HMW, Gelderblom H, Voest EE. Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis of durvalumab in patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumours. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:205. [PMID: 36870947 PMCID: PMC9985217 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10663-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab across various mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). This is a clinical study in which patients are treated with drugs outside their labeled indication, based on their tumour molecular profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours who had exhausted all standard of care options were eligible. Patients were treated with durvalumab. The primary endpoints were clinical benefit ((CB): objective response (OR) or stable disease ≥16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1, up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB in stage 1. At baseline, fresh frozen biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses. RESULTS Twenty-six patients with 10 different cancer types were included. Two patients (2/26, 8%) were considered as non-evaluable for the primary endpoint. CB was observed in 13 patients (13/26, 50%) with an OR in 7 patients (7/26, 27%). The remaining 11 patients (11/26, 42%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5 months (95% CI, 2-not reached) and 14 months (95% CI, 5-not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. We found a significantly higher structural variant (SV) burden in patients without CB. Additionally, we observed a significant enrichment of JAK1 frameshift mutations and a significantly lower IFN-γ expression in patients without CB. CONCLUSION Durvalumab was generally well-tolerated and provided durable responses in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours. High SV burden, JAK1 frameshift mutations and low IFN-γ expression were associated with a lack of CB; this provides a rationale for larger studies to validate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial registration: NCT02925234. First registration date: 05/10/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit S Geurts
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas W Battaglia
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J Maxime van Berge Henegouwen
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien J Zeverijn
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs F de Wit
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Louisa R Hoes
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van der Wijngaart
- Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy W J de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Cancer Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M L Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Cancer Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frans L Opdam
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Mariette Labots
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ann Hoeben
- Department of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Emile D Kerver
- Department of Medical Oncology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan D Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frans G L Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Hospital, Sittard-Geelen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan M van Rooijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Danny Houtsma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | | | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. .,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Barros HA, Duin JJ, Mulder D, van der Noort V, Noordzij MA, Wit EM, Pos FJ, Vogel WV, Schaake EE, van Leeuwen FW, van Leeuwen PJ, Grivas N, van der Poel HG. Sentinel Node Procedure to Select Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Patients with Occult Nodal Metastases for Whole Pelvis Radiotherapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:80-89. [PMID: 36874598 PMCID: PMC9975002 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate identification of men who harbor nodal metastases is necessary to select patients who most likely benefit from whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT). Limited sensitivity of diagnostic imaging approaches for the detection of nodal micrometastases has led to the exploration of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Objective To evaluate whether SLNB can be used as a tool to select pathologically node-positive patients who likely benefit from WPRT. Design setting and participants We included 528 clinically node-negative primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients with an estimated nodal risk of >5% treated between 2007 and 2018. Intervention A total of 267 patients were directly treated with prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT; non-SLNB group), while 261 patients underwent SLNB to remove lymph nodes directly draining from the primary tumor prior to radiotherapy (SLNB group); pN0 patients were treated with PORT, while pN1 patients were offered WPRT. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and radiological recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were compared using propensity score weighted (PSW) Cox proportional hazard models. Results and limitations The median follow-up was 71 mo. Occult nodal metastases were found in 97 (37%) SLNB patients (median metastasis size: 2 mm). Adjusted 7-yr BCRFS rates were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77-86%) in the SLNB group and 49% (95% CI 43-56%) in the non-SLNB group. The corresponding adjusted 7-yr RRFS rates were 83% (95% CI 78-87%) and 52% (95% CI 46-59%), respectively. In the PSW multivariable Cox regression analysis, SLNB was associated with improved BCRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.59, p < 0.001) and RRFS (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, p < 0.001). Limitations include the bias inherent to the study's retrospective nature. Conclusions SLNB-based selection of pN1 PCa patients for WPRT was associated with significantly improved BCRFS and RRFS compared with (conventional) imaging-based PORT. Patient summary Sentinel node biopsy can be used to select patients who will benefit from the addition of pelvis radiotherapy. This strategy results in a longer duration of prostate-specific antigen control and a lower risk of radiological recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda A. de Barros
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 205 121 543; Fax: +31 205 122 459.
| | - Jan J. Duin
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Mulder
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Arjen Noordzij
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M.K. Wit
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J. Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V. Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva E. Schaake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heirman AN, van der Noort V, van Son R, Petersen JF, van der Molen L, Halmos GB, Dirven R, van den Brekel MWM. Does Prophylactic Replacement of Voice Prosthesis Make Sense? A Study to Predict Prosthesis Lifetime. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:429-434. [PMID: 35917180 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221116815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Voice prosthesis leakage significantly affects the quality of life of patients undergoing laryngectomy, causing insecurity and frequent unplanned hospital visits and costs. In this study, the concept of prophylactic voice prosthesis replacement was explored to prevent leakages. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary hospital. METHODS This study included all patients who underwent laryngectomy between 2000 and 2012 in the Netherlands Cancer Institute. Device lifetimes and voice prosthesis replacements of a retrospective cohort were used to calculate the number of needed voice prostheses per patient per year to prevent 70% of the leakages by prophylactic replacement. Various strategies for the timing of prophylactic replacement were considered: adaptive strategies based on the individual patient's history of replacement and fixed strategies based on the results of patients with similar voice prosthesis or treatment characteristics. RESULTS Patients used a median 3.4 voice prostheses per year (range, 0.1-48.1). We found high inter- and intrapatient variability in device lifetime. When prophylactic replacement is applied, this would become a median 9.4 voice prostheses per year, which means replacement every 38 days, implying >6 additional voice prostheses per patient per year. The individual adaptive model showed that preventing 70% of the leakages was impossible for most patients and only a median 25% can be prevented. Monte-Carlo simulations showed that prophylactic replacement is not feasible due to the high coefficient of variation (SD/mean) in device lifetime. CONCLUSION Based on our simulations, prophylactic replacement of voice prostheses is not feasible due to high inter- and intrapatient variation in device lifetime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne N Heirman
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics and Statistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rob van Son
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center of Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Japke F Petersen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisette van der Molen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gyorgy B Halmos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Richard Dirven
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel W M van den Brekel
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center of Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Almekinders CAM, Konings IRHM, van der Noort V, van den Berg SM, Bos MEMM, Dezentjé VO. Abstract OT2-01-08: SEQUence of Endocrine therapy in advanced Luminal Breast cancer (SEQUEL-Breast): A phase 2 study on fulvestrant beyond progression in combination with alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, HR+ HER2- advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot2-01-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Goal To investigate the efficacy of alpelisib added to fulvestrant beyond progression in patients with HR+ HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). Background The SOLAR-1 study (Andre et al, 2019) has shown that the addition of alpelisib, an alpha-specific PI3K-inhibitor to fulvestrant led to a PFS-benefit of 5.3 months in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ HER2- ABC. In this study, patients were fulvestrant-naive, and only 6% of this population was previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Nowadays, most patients have been treated with a CDK4/6i, either combined with an aromatase-inhibitor (AI) in 1st line, or with fulvestrant in the 1st or 2nd line setting. Results of the ongoing Dutch SONIA-trial (NCT03425838) will show whether the addition of CDK4/6i to an AI in 1st line is superior to the addition of CDK4/6i to fulvestrant in 2nd line. Patients who have progressed on a CDK4/6i in either line and fulvestrant may be treated with fulvestrant and alpelisib. However, the efficacy of fulvestrant beyond progression combined with alpelisib is unknown. Aim of this study The aim is to determine if treatment with fulvestrant beyond progression and alpelisib results in a clinically meaningful median PFS of ≥6 months. Primary endpoint: Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints: ‘On treatment’ PFS Overall survival Objective Response Rate Clinical Benefit Rate Duration of response Safety Risk factors for alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia Quality of life Pharmacokinetics Prognostic value of ctDNA Mechanisms of resistance Trial design The SEQUEL-Breast trial is a nationwide Dutch investigator-initiated phase 2 trial. 25 centers are expected to participate in the SEQUEL-Breast. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05392608 Intervention: fulvestrant beyond progression combined with alpelisib. Population Patients must be adults with HR+ HER2- ABC with an activating PIK3CA-mutation. Prior treatment with an AI and fulvestrant is mandatory, as well as prior treatment with a CDK4/6i in either line. Patients must have progressed on fulvestrant (+/- CDK4/6i), and fulvestrant must be the most recent line of therapy. Patients with ECOG performance score 0,1 or 2 are eligible, as well as those with controlled (HbA1C < 8.4%) diabetes mellitus type 2. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, visceral crisis, symptomatic CNS metastases or clinically relevant heart disease are ineligible. Patients with diseases or previous surgery that might affect the bioavailability of alpelisib, those in need to use CYP3A4 inhibitors or BRCP inhibitors, as well as patients with any other conditions that would put them at particular risk when partaking in the study, are also ineligible. Accrual Start: June 2022 Accrual, June 27: 3 patients Target: 105 patients (minimum) to 130 patients (maximum) Estimated accrual time: 2-3 years Statistical considerations For sample size calculation, H1 (median PFS≥6 months) is weighed against H0 (median PFS≤4 months) in a one sample log rank test. α=0.05 β=0.1. 71 events are needed. We estimated that inclusion of 79 patients is required to reach 71 events, given an accrual time of 36 months and a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. To ensure that also PFS ‘on treatment’ has the desired accuracy, we accounted for 25% non-persistance due to toxicity, hence 105 patients. On top of these 105 patients, another 25 patients may be included, if they harbor rare PIK3CA mutations. Further information Corresponding author: sequel@nki.nl BOOG Study Center acts as sponsor for this trial. This trial is funded by Novartis.
Citation Format: Cornelia AM Almekinders, Inge RHM Konings, Vincent van der Noort, Susan M van den Berg, Monique EMM Bos, Vincent O Dezentjé. SEQUence of Endocrine therapy in advanced Luminal Breast cancer (SEQUEL-Breast): A phase 2 study on fulvestrant beyond progression in combination with alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, HR+ HER2- advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-01-08.
Collapse
|
16
|
Severson TM, Zhu Y, Prekovic S, Schuurman K, Nguyen HM, Brown LG, Hakkola S, Kim Y, Kneppers J, Linder S, Stelloo S, Lieftink C, van der Heijden M, Nykter M, van der Noort V, Sanders J, Morris B, Jenster G, van Leenders GJLH, Pomerantz M, Freedman ML, Beijersbergen RL, Urbanucci A, Wessels L, Corey E, Zwart W, Bergman AM. Enhancer profiling identifies epigenetic markers of endocrine resistance and reveals therapeutic options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. medRxiv 2023:2023.02.24.23286403. [PMID: 36865297 PMCID: PMC9980263 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.24.23286403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Androgen Receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors, including enzalutamide, are treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but resistance inevitably develops. Using metastatic samples from a prospective phase II clinical trial, we epigenetically profiled enhancer/promoter activities with H3K27ac chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing, before and after AR-targeted therapy. We identified a distinct subset of H3K27ac-differentially marked regions that associated with treatment responsiveness. These data were successfully validated in mCRPC patient-derived xenograft models (PDX). In silico analyses revealed HDAC3 as a critical factor that can drive resistance to hormonal interventions, which we validated in vitro . Using cell lines and mCRPC PDX tumors in vitro , we identified drug-drug synergy between enzalutamide and the pan-HDAC inhibitor vorinostat, providing therapeutic proof-of-concept. These findings demonstrate rationale for new therapeutic strategies using a combination of AR and HDAC inhibitors to improve patient outcome in advanced stages of mCRPC.
Collapse
|
17
|
Hagens MJ, Stelwagen PJ, Veerman H, Rynja SP, Smeenge M, van der Noort V, Roeleveld TA, van Kesteren J, Remmers S, Roobol MJ, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. External validation of the Rotterdam prostate cancer risk calculator within a high-risk Dutch clinical cohort. World J Urol 2023; 41:13-18. [PMID: 36245015 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04185-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to externally validate the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (RPCRC)-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI within a Dutch clinical cohort. METHODS Men subjected to prostate biopsies, between 2018 and 2021, due to a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) were retrospectively included. The performance of the RPCRC-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI was analyzed in terms of discrimination, calibration and net benefit. In addition, the need for recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds for referral was investigated. Clinically significant (cs) PCa was defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4. RESULTS A total of 1575 men were included in the analysis. PCa was diagnosed in 63.2% (996/1575) of men and csPCa in 41.7% (656/1575) of men. Use of the RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 37.3% (587/1575) of all MRIs within this cohort, thereby missing 18.3% (120/656) of csPCa diagnoses. After recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds to 20% for PCa and 10% for csPCa, use of the recalibrated RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 15.1% (238/1575) of all MRIs, resulting in 5.3% (35/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed. The performance of the RPCRC-MRI was good; use of this risk calculator could have prevented 10.7% (169/1575) of all biopsies, resulting in 1.2% (8/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed. CONCLUSION The RPCRC-3/4 underestimates the probability of having csPCa within this Dutch clinical cohort, resulting in significant numbers of csPCa diagnoses being missed. For optimal performance of a risk calculator in a specific cohort, evaluation of its performance within the population under study is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinus J Hagens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Piter J Stelwagen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Veerman
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sybren P Rynja
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Smeenge
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Hospital St Jansdal, Harderwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton A Roeleveld
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien van Kesteren
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Veerman H, Donswijk M, Bekers E, Bodar YJ, Meijer D, van Moorselaar RA, Oprea‐Lager DE, van der Noort V, van Leeuwen PJ, Vis AN, van der Poel HG. The oncological characteristics of non-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-expressing primary prostate cancer on preoperative PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography. BJU Int 2022; 130:750-753. [PMID: 36117468 PMCID: PMC9828411 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Veerman
- Department of UrologyNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Department of UrologyAmsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU Medical CentreAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Prostate Cancer Network NetherlandsAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Maarten Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear MedicineNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Elise Bekers
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Yves J.L. Bodar
- Department of UrologyAmsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU Medical CentreAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Prostate Cancer Network NetherlandsAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Department of UrologyAmsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU Medical CentreAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Prostate Cancer Network NetherlandsAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar
- Department of UrologyAmsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU Medical CentreAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Prostate Cancer Network NetherlandsAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea‐Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU Medical CentreAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of BiometricsNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of UrologyNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Prostate Cancer Network NetherlandsAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of UrologyAmsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU Medical CentreAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Prostate Cancer Network NetherlandsAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of UrologyNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Department of UrologyAmsterdam University Medical Centres, Location VU Medical CentreAmsterdamthe Netherlands,Prostate Cancer Network NetherlandsAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hummelink K, van der Noort V, Muller M, Schouten RD, Lalezari F, Peters D, Theelen WS, Koelzer VH, Mertz KD, Zippelius A, van den Heuvel MM, Broeks A, Haanen JB, Schumacher TN, Meijer GA, Smit EF, Monkhorst K, Thommen DS. PD-1T TILs as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Benefit to PD-1 Blockade in Patients with Advanced NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4893-4906. [PMID: 35852792 PMCID: PMC9762332 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Durable clinical benefit to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently limited to a small fraction of patients, underlining the need for predictive biomarkers. We recently identified a tumor-reactive tumor-infiltrating T lymphocyte (TIL) pool, termed PD-1T TILs, with predictive potential in NSCLC. Here, we examined PD-1T TILs as biomarker in NSCLC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN PD-1T TILs were digitally quantified in 120 baseline samples from advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade. Primary outcome was disease control (DC) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were DC at 12 months and survival. Exploratory analyses addressed the impact of lesion-specific responses, tissue sample properties, and combination with other biomarkers on the predictive value of PD-1T TILs. RESULTS PD-1T TILs as a biomarker reached 77% sensitivity and 67% specificity at 6 months, and 93% and 65% at 12 months, respectively. Particularly, a patient group without clinical benefit was reliably identified, indicated by a high negative predictive value (NPV) (88% at 6 months, 98% at 12 months). High PD-1T TILs related to significantly longer progression-free (HR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.24-0.63, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (HR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.28-0.76, P < 0.01). Predictive performance was increased when lesion-specific responses and samples obtained immediately before treatment were assessed. Notably, the predictive performance of PD-1T TILs was superior to PD-L1 and tertiary lymphoid structures in the same cohort. CONCLUSIONS This study established PD-1T TILs as predictive biomarker for clinical benefit to PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced NSCLC. Most importantly, the high NPV demonstrates an accurate identification of a patient group without benefit. See related commentary by Anagnostou and Luke, p. 4835.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlijn Hummelink
- Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostic Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirte Muller
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert D. Schouten
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ferry Lalezari
- Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis Peters
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willemijn S.M.E. Theelen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Viktor H. Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kirsten D. Mertz
- Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Alfred Zippelius
- Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michel M. van den Heuvel
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John B.A.G. Haanen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ton N. Schumacher
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostic Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Egbert F. Smit
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostic Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Corresponding Authors: Daniela S. Thommen, Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, the Netherlands. E-mail: ; and Kim Monkhorst,
| | - Daniela S. Thommen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Corresponding Authors: Daniela S. Thommen, Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, the Netherlands. E-mail: ; and Kim Monkhorst,
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gijtenbeek RG, van der Noort V, Aerts JG, Staal-van den Brekel JA, Smit EF, Krouwels FH, Wilschut FA, Hiltermann TJN, Timens W, Schuuring E, Janssen JD, Goosens M, van den Berg PM, de Langen AJ, Stigt JA, van den Borne BE, Groen HJ, van Geffen WH, van der Wekken AJ. Randomised controlled trial of first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) versus intercalated TKI with chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00239-2022. [PMID: 36267895 PMCID: PMC9574558 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00239-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Previous studies have shown interference between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in the cell cycle, thus reducing efficacy. In this randomised controlled trial we investigated whether intercalated erlotinib with chemotherapy was superior compared to erlotinib alone in untreated advanced EGFR-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods Treatment-naïve patients with an activating EGFR mutation, ECOG performance score of 0-3 and adequate organ function were randomly assigned 1:1 to either four cycles of cisplatin-pemetrexed with intercalated erlotinib (day 2-16 out of 21 days per cycle) followed by pemetrexed and erlotinib maintenance (CPE) or erlotinib monotherapy. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival, objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity. Results Between April 2014 and September 2016, 22 patients were randomised equally into both arms; the study was stopped due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 64 months. Median PFS was 13.7 months (95% CI 5.2-18.8) for CPE and 10.3 months (95% CI 7.1-15.5; hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.25-1.57) for erlotinib monotherapy; when compensating for number of days receiving erlotinib, PFS of the CPE arm was superior (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.83; p=0.02). ORR was 64% for CPE versus 55% for erlotinib monotherapy. Median overall survival was 31.7 months (95% CI 21.8-61.9 months) for CPE compared to 17.2 months (95% CI 11.5-45.5 months) for erlotinib monotherapy (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.22-1.41 months). Patients treated with CPE had higher rates of treatment-related fatigue, anorexia, weight loss and renal toxicity. Conclusion Intercalating erlotinib with cisplatin-pemetrexed provides a longer PFS compared to erlotinib alone in EGFR-mutated NSCLC at the expense of more toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolof G.P. Gijtenbeek
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Dept of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim G.J.V. Aerts
- Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Egbert F. Smit
- Dept of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H. Krouwels
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Frank A. Wilschut
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - T. Jeroen N. Hiltermann
- Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Timens
- Dept of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Dept of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost D.J. Janssen
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven/Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Goosens
- Dept of Pulmonary Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Zutphen, The Netherlands
| | | | - A. Joop de Langen
- Dept of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos A. Stigt
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harry J.M. Groen
- Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter H. van Geffen
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Anthonie J. van der Wekken
- Dept of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Disselhorst MJ, Lubeck Y, van der Noort V, Quispel-Janssen J, Seignette IM, Sanders J, Peters D, Hooijberg E, Baas P. Immune cells in mesothelioma microenvironment simplistic marker of response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab? Lung Cancer 2022; 173:49-52. [PMID: 36122471 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a malignant disease of the pleura which recently can be treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). To optimize this treatment, a better understanding of the tumor micro environment is needed. We investigated subgroups of immune cells in subsequent tumor biopsies of patients treated with ICI. METHODS Biopsies from MPM patients included in two clinical ICI trials (nivolumab alone and an ipilimumab/nivolumab combination) were examined. At baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment, pleural biopsies were taken to examine the tumor microenvironment (CD20+, CD4+, CD8+, FoxP3+ and PD-1+ ). Cell density was defined as the number of marker positive cells per mm2. Radiological responses were evaluated as partial response, stable disease or progressive disease according to modified RECIST criteria. RESULTS Thirty-four and 36 patients were included in the nivolumab and ipiliumumab/nivolumab trial respectively. In the nivolumab trial, no significant differences in cell densities were seen in baseline biopsies of patients with partial response versus progressive disease. In contrast, in the ipilimumab/nivolumab trial, a higher cell density of CD4+, CD8+, FoxP3+ and PD-1+ cells at baseline was significantly correlated with partial responses. On-treatment biopsies of both trials did not show significant changes when compared to baseline biopsies. CONCLUSION Biopsies from patients responding to nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment show a significant higher cell density of CD4+, CD8+, FoxP3+ and PD-1+ cells, without a change after 6 weeks of treatment. This observation is a first step in exploring the tumor microenvironment as predictor of response in ICI treatment in MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J Disselhorst
- Department of Thoracic Oncology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Yoni Lubeck
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Biometrics Department. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Josine Quispel-Janssen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris M Seignette
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis Peters
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Hooijberg
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rohaan MW, Stahlie EHA, Franke V, Zijlker LP, Wilgenhof S, van der Noort V, van Akkooi ACJ, Haanen JBAG. Neoadjuvant nivolumab + T-VEC combination therapy for resectable early stage or metastatic (IIIB-IVM1a) melanoma with injectable disease: study protocol of the NIVEC trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:851. [PMID: 35927710 PMCID: PMC9351098 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09896-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trials investigating neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with melanoma have shown high clinical and pathologic response rates. Treatment with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a modified herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1), is approved for patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma and has the potential to make tumors more susceptible for ICI. Combination ICI and intralesional T-VEC has already been investigated in patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV disease, however, no data is available yet on the potential benefit of this combination therapy in neoadjuvant setting. Methods This single center, single arm, phase II study aims to show an improved major pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, either pCR or near-pCR, up to 45% in 24 patients with resectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma upon neoadjuvant combination treatment with intralesional T-VEC and systemic nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody). Patients will receive four courses of T-VEC up to 4 mL (first dose as seroconversion dose) and three doses of nivolumab (240 mg flatdose) every 2 weeks, followed by surgical resection in week nine. The primary endpoint of this trial is pathologic response rate. Secondary endpoints are safety, the rate of delay of surgery and event-free survival. Additionally, prognostic and predictive biomarker research and health-related quality of life evaluation will be performed. Discussion Intralesional T-VEC has the capacity to heighten the immune response and to elicit an abscopal effect in melanoma in combination with ICI. However, the potential clinical benefit of T-VEC plus ICI in the neoadjuvant setting remains unknown. This is the first trial investigating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment of T-VEC and nivolumab followed by surgical resection in patients with stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, with the potential of high pathologic response rates and acceptable toxicity. Trial registration This trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT- number: 2019–001911-22) and the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (NL71866.000.19) on 4th June 2020. Secondary identifying number: NCT04330430.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje W Rohaan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma H A Stahlie
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Viola Franke
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne P Zijlker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sofie Wilgenhof
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John B A G Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Samsom KG, Schipper LJ, Roepman P, Bosch LJ, Lalezari F, Klompenhouwer EG, de Langen AJ, Buffart TE, Riethorst I, Schoenmaker L, Schout D, van der Noort V, van den Berg JG, de Bruijn E, van der Hoeven JJ, van Snellenberg H, van der Kolk LE, Cuppen E, Voest EE, Meijer GA, Monkhorst K. Feasibility of whole genome sequencing based tumor diagnostics in routine pathology practice. J Pathol 2022; 258:179-188. [PMID: 35792649 PMCID: PMC9546477 DOI: 10.1002/path.5988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The current increase in number and diversity of targeted anticancer agents poses challenges to the logistics and timeliness of molecular diagnostics (MolDx), resulting in underdiagnosis and treatment. Whole‐genome sequencing (WGS) may provide a sustainable solution for addressing current as well as future diagnostic challenges. The present study therefore aimed to prospectively assess feasibility, validity, and value of WGS in routine clinical practice. WGS was conducted independently of, and in parallel with, standard of care (SOC) diagnostics on routinely obtained tumor samples from 1,200 consecutive patients with metastatic cancer. Results from both tests were compared and discussed in a dedicated tumor board. From 1,200 patients, 1,302 samples were obtained, of which 1,216 contained tumor cells. WGS was successful in 70% (854/1,216) of samples with a median turnaround time of 11 days. Low tumor purity (<20%) was the main reason for not completing WGS. WGS identified 99.2% and SOC MolDx 99.7% of the total of 896 biomarkers found in genomic regions covered by both tests. Actionable biomarkers were found in 603/848 patients (71%). Of the 936 associated therapy options identified by WGS, 343 were identified with SOC MolDx (36.6%). Biomarker‐based therapy was started in 147 patients. WGS revealed 49 not previously identified pathogenic germline variants. Fresh‐frozen, instead of formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded, sample logistics were easily adopted as experienced by the professionals involved. WGS for patients with metastatic cancer is well feasible in routine clinical practice, successfully yielding comprehensive genomic profiling for the vast majority of patients. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris G. Samsom
- Department of Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Luuk J. Schipper
- Department of Molecular Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute 1066 CX Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Office Jaarbeurs Innovation Mile (JIM) Jaarbeursplein 6 3521 AL Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park, 1098 XH Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Linda J.W. Bosch
- Department of Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ferry Lalezari
- Department of Radiology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Adrianus J. de Langen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Tineke E. Buffart
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute 1066 CX Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Immy Riethorst
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park, 1098 XH Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Schoenmaker
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park, 1098 XH Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Daoin Schout
- Department of Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics Netherlands Cancer Institute 1066 CX Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Jose G. van den Berg
- Department of Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ewart de Bruijn
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park, 1098 XH Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lizet E. van der Kolk
- Family Cancer Clinic Netherlands Cancer Institute 1066 CX Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Cuppen
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park, 1098 XH Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Center for Molecular Medicine University Medical Centre Utrecht 3584 CX Heidelberglaan 100 Utrecht The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Office Jaarbeurs Innovation Mile (JIM) Jaarbeursplein 6 3521 AL Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Emile E. Voest
- Department of Molecular Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute 1066 CX Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute 1066 CX Plesmanlaan 121 Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Office Jaarbeurs Innovation Mile (JIM) Jaarbeursplein 6 3521 AL Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A. Meijer
- Department of Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vessies DC, Schuurbiers MM, van der Noort V, Schouten I, Linders TC, Lanfermeijer M, Ramkisoensing KL, Hartemink KJ, Monkhorst K, van den Heuvel MM, van den Broek D. Combining variant detection and fragment length analysis improves detection of minimal residual disease in post‐surgery circulating tumour
DNA
of stage
II‐IIIA NSCLC
patients. Mol Oncol 2022; 16:2719-2732. [PMID: 35674097 PMCID: PMC9297781 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Stage II–IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receive adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery as standard‐of‐care treatment, even though only approximately 5.8% of patients will benefit. Identifying patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) after surgery using tissue‐informed testing of postoperative plasma circulating cell‐free tumour DNA (ctDNA) may allow adjuvant therapy to be withheld from patients without MRD. However, the detection of MRD in the postoperative setting is challenging, and more sensitive methods are urgently needed. We developed a method that combines variant calling and a novel ctDNA fragment length analysis using hybrid capture sequencing data. Among 36 stage II–IIIA NSCLC patients, this method distinguished patients with and without recurrence of disease in a 20 times repeated 10‐fold cross validation with 75% accuracy (P = 0.0029). In contrast, using only variant calling or only fragment length analysis, no signification distinction between patients was shown (P = 0.24 and P = 0.074 respectively). In addition, a variant‐level fragmentation score was developed that was able to classify variants detected in plasma cfDNA into tumour‐derived or white‐blood‐cell‐derived variants with 84% accuracy. The findings in this study may help drive the integration of various types of information from the same data, eventually leading to cheaper and more sensitive techniques to be used in this challenging clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan C.L. Vessies
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of laboratory medicine Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent van der Noort
- 3Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital biometrics department Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Irene Schouten
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of thoracic oncology Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Theodora C. Linders
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of laboratory medicine Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Mirthe Lanfermeijer
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of laboratory medicine Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Kalpana L. Ramkisoensing
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of laboratory medicine Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Koen J. Hartemink
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of surgery Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of pathology Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | | | - Daan van den Broek
- Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital department of laboratory medicine Amsterdam the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rohaan MW, Zijlker LP, Stahlie EH, Franke V, Wilgenhof S, van der Noort V, Van Akkooi ACJ, Haanen JBAG. Neo-adjuvant T-VEC plus nivolumab combination therapy for resectable early-stage or metastatic (IIIB-IVM1a) melanoma with injectable disease: The NIVEC trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps9607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS9607 Background: The prognosis of patients with melanoma is significantly correlated with disease stage and has greatly improved with the introduction of the currently approved therapies. Trials investigating neo-adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown high pathologic response rates up to 25-80%, however, still a large group of patients derive no (durable) clinical benefit. Treatment with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a modified herpes simplex virus type-1, is approved for patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, with high and durable response rates and a mild toxicity profile. Earlier trials have suggested that T-VEC has the capacity to heighten the immune response and to elicit an abscopal effect in melanoma when given in combination with ICI. Combination ICI and intralesional T-VEC has already been investigated in patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV disease, however, no data is available yet on the potential benefit of this combination therapy in neo-adjuvant setting. This is the first trial investigating the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuvant treatment of T-VEC in combination with nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody), followed by surgical resection in patients with resectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, with the potential of high pathologic response rates and acceptable toxicity. Methods: In this single center, single arm, phase II study, a total of 24 patients ≥18 years of age and a good clinical performance score with treatment naïve, stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma (AJCC 8th edition) with injectable disease and resectable (sub)cutaneous satellite or in-transit metastases and/or tumor positive lymph nodes, will be included. Patients will receive four courses of T-VEC up to 4mL (first dose as seroconversion dose) and three doses of nivolumab (240mg flatdose) every two weeks, followed by surgical resection in week nine. The primary endpoint of this trial is pathologic response rate, with the aim to show a high major pathologic (near-complete or complete) response rate up to 45%. Secondary endpoints are safety according to CTCAE v5.0, the rate of delay of surgery and event free survival. Additionally, prognostic and predictive biomarker research and health-related quality of life evaluation will be performed. Enrollment started in June 2020 in the Netherlands Cancer Institute, with currently 13 of the 24 planned patients treated. Clinical trial information: NCT04330430.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje W. Rohaan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lisanne P. Zijlker
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emma H.A. Stahlie
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Viola Franke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sofie Wilgenhof
- Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - John B. A. G. Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hoes LR, van Berge Henegouwen JM, van der Wijngaart H, Zeverijn LJ, van der Velden DL, van de Haar J, Roepman P, de Leng WJ, Jansen AM, van Werkhoven E, van der Noort V, Huitema AD, Gort EH, de Groot JWB, Kerver ED, de Groot DJ, Erdkamp F, Beerepoot LV, Hendriks MP, Smit EF, van der Graaf WT, van Herpen CM, Labots M, Hoeben A, Morreau H, Lolkema MP, Cuppen E, Gelderblom H, Verheul HM, Voest EE. Patients with Rare Cancers in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) Benefit from Genomics-Guided Treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1402-1411. [PMID: 35046062 PMCID: PMC9365364 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with rare cancers (incidence less than 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year) commonly have less treatment opportunities and are understudied at the level of genomic targets. We hypothesized that patients with rare cancer benefit from approved anticancer drugs outside their label similar to common cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancers harboring an actionable molecular profile are matched to FDA/European Medicines Agency-approved targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Patients are enrolled in parallel cohorts based on the histologic tumor type, molecular profile and study drug. Primary endpoint is clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, stable disease ≥ 16 weeks). RESULTS Of 1,145 submitted cases, 500 patients, including 164 patients with rare cancers, started one of the 25 available drugs and were evaluable for treatment outcome. The overall clinical benefit rate was 33% in both the rare cancer and nonrare cancer subgroup. Inactivating alterations of CDKN2A and activating BRAF aberrations were overrepresented in patients with rare cancer compared with nonrare cancers, resulting in more matches to CDK4/6 inhibitors (14% vs. 4%; P ≤ 0.001) or BRAF inhibitors (9% vs. 1%; P ≤ 0.001). Patients with rare cancer treated with small-molecule inhibitors targeting BRAF experienced higher rates of clinical benefit (75%) than the nonrare cancer subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive molecular testing in patients with rare cancers may identify treatment opportunities and clinical benefit similar to patients with common cancers. Our findings highlight the importance of access to broad molecular diagnostics to ensure equal treatment opportunities for all patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa R. Hoes
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jade M. van Berge Henegouwen
- Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van der Wijngaart
- Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien J. Zeverijn
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne L. van der Velden
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris van de Haar
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Roepman
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy J. de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M.L. Jansen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik van Werkhoven
- Biometrics Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alwin D.R. Huitema
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eelke H. Gort
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Emile D. Kerver
- Department of Medical Oncology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Derk Jan de Groot
- Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Hospital, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | - Laurens V. Beerepoot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Egbert F. Smit
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Carla M.L. van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mariette Labots
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ann Hoeben
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P. Lolkema
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Edwin Cuppen
- Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk M.W. Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E. Voest
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Corresponding Author: Emile E. Voest, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands. Phone: 312-0512-9111; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Joosten PJM, Dickhoff C, van der Noort V, Smeekens M, Numan RC, Klomp HM, van Diessen JNA, Belderbos JSA, Smit EF, Monkhorst K, Oosterhuis JWA, van den Heuvel MM, Dahele M, Hartemink KJ. Importance of tumour volume and histology in trimodality treatment of patients with Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer-results from a retrospective analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 34:566-575. [PMID: 34734237 PMCID: PMC8972331 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter J M Joosten
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Chris Dickhoff
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Smeekens
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Rachel C Numan
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Houke M Klomp
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judi N A van Diessen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jose S A Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Egbert F Smit
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Michel M van den Heuvel
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Max Dahele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen J Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Joosten SEP, Wellenstein M, Koornstra R, van Rossum A, Sanders J, van der Noort V, Ferrandez MC, Harkes R, Mandjes IAM, Rosing H, Huitema A, Beijnen JH, Wesseling J, van Diest PJ, Horlings HM, Linn SC, Zwart W. IHC-based Ki67 as response biomarker to tamoxifen in breast cancer window trials enrolling premenopausal women. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:138. [PMID: 34671036 PMCID: PMC8528844 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00344-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Window studies are gaining traction to assess (molecular) changes in short timeframes. Decreased tumor cell positivity for the proliferation marker Ki67 is often used as a proxy for treatment response. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based Ki67 on tissue from neo-adjuvant trials was previously reported to be predictive for long-term response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer in postmenopausal women, but none of these trials enrolled premenopausal women. Nonetheless, the marker is being used on this subpopulation. We compared pathologist assessed IHC-based Ki67 in samples from pre- and postmenopausal women in a neo-adjuvant, endocrine therapy focused trial (NCT00738777), randomized between tamoxifen, anastrozole, or fulvestrant. These results were compared with (1) IHC-based Ki67 scoring by AI, (2) mitotic figures, (3) mRNA-based Ki67, (4) five independent gene expression signatures capturing proliferation, and (5) blood levels for tamoxifen and its metabolites as well as estradiol. Upon tamoxifen, IHC-based Ki67 levels were decreased in both pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer patients, which was confirmed using mRNA-based cell proliferation markers. The magnitude of decrease of Ki67 IHC was smaller in pre- versus postmenopausal women. We found a direct relationship between post-treatment estradiol levels and the magnitude of the Ki67 decrease in tumors. These data suggest IHC-based Ki67 may be an appropriate biomarker for tamoxifen response in premenopausal breast cancer patients, but anti-proliferative effect size depends on estradiol levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey E P Joosten
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rutger Koornstra
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Rijnstate hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Annelot van Rossum
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria C Ferrandez
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf Harkes
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A M Mandjes
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Rosing
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alwin Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Muller M, Hoogendoorn R, Moritz RJG, van der Noort V, Lanfermeijer M, Korse CM, van den Broek D, Ten Hoeve JJ, Baas P, van Rossum HH, van den Heuvel MM. Erratum to: Validation of a clinical blood-based decision aid to guide immunotherapy treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol 2021; 43:281. [PMID: 34657868 DOI: 10.3233/tub-219007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
30
|
de Gooijer CJ, van der Noort V, van den Broek D, Baas P, Burgers JA. Prognostic value of CYFRA 21.1 in malignant mesothelioma: A brief report of the randomized phase II trial NVALT19. Lung Cancer 2021; 161:197-199. [PMID: 34607698 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cornedine J de Gooijer
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Witlox WJA, Ramaekers BLT, Lacas B, Pechoux CL, Sun A, Wang SY, Hu C, Redman M, van der Noort V, Li N, Guckenberger M, van Tinteren H, Groen HJM, Joore MA, De Ruysscher DKM. Association of different fractionation schedules for prophylactic cranial irradiation with toxicity and brain metastases-free survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from three randomized trials. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:163-166. [PMID: 34619235 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We assessed the impact of different PCI fractionation schedules (30 Gy in 10 versus 15 fractions) on brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and toxicity in stage III NSCLC. Our results suggest that 30 Gy in 10 fractions is associated with increased toxicity, while no conclusive evidence of improving BMFS was seen with this schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem J A Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands.
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Cecile Le Pechoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexander Sun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Si-Yu Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Hu
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, United States; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Mary Redman
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Trial and Data Center, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk K M De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Berger DMS, van den Berg NS, van der Noort V, van der Hiel B, Valdés Olmos RA, Buckle TA, KleinJan GH, Brouwer OR, Vermeeren L, Karakullukçu B, van den Brekel MWM, van de Wiel BA, Nieweg OE, Balm AJM, van Leeuwen FWB, Klop WMC. Technologic (R)Evolution Leads to Detection of More Sentinel Nodes in Patients with Melanoma in the Head and Neck Region. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1357-1362. [PMID: 33637591 PMCID: PMC8724899 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB) has proven to be a valuable tool for staging melanoma patients. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, this procedure has undergone several technologic refinements, including the introduction of SPECT/CT, as well as radioguidance and fluorescence guidance. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of this technologic evolution on SNB in the head and neck region. The primary endpoint was the false-negative (FN) rate. Secondary endpoints were number of harvested SNs, overall operation time, operation time per harvested SN, and postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective database was queried for cutaneous head and neck melanoma patients who underwent SNB at The Netherlands Cancer Institute between 1993 and 2016. The implementation of new detection techniques was divided into 4 groups: 1993-2005, with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative use of both a γ-ray detection probe and patent blue (n = 30); 2006-2007, with addition of preoperative road maps based on SPECT/CT (n = 15); 2008-2009, with intraoperative use of a portable γ-camera (n = 40); and 2010-2016, with addition of near-infrared fluorescence guidance (n = 192). Results: In total, 277 patients were included. At least 1 SN was identified in all patients. A tumor-positive SN was found in 59 patients (21.3%): 10 in group 1 (33.3%), 3 in group 2 (20.0%), 6 in group 3 (15.0%), and 40 in group 4 (20.8%). Regional recurrences in patients with tumor-negative SNs resulted in an overall FN rate of 11.9% (group 1, 16.7%; group 2, 0%; group 3, 14.3%; group 4, 11.1%). The number of harvested nodes increased with advancing technologies (P = 0.003), whereas Breslow thickness and operation time per harvested SN decreased (P = 0.003 and P = 0.017, respectively). There was no significant difference in percentage of tumor-positive SNs, overall operation time, and complication rate between the different groups. Conclusion: The use of advanced detection technologies led to a higher number of identified SNs without an increase in overall operation time, possibly indicating an improved surgical efficiency. Operation time per harvested SN decreased; the average FN rate remained 11.9% and was unchanged over 23 y. There was no significant change in postoperative complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique M S Berger
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Nynke S van den Berg
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernies van der Hiel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Renato A Valdés Olmos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa A Buckle
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs H KleinJan
- Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lenka Vermeeren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baris Karakullukçu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel W M van den Brekel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart A van de Wiel
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia and Central Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alfons J M Balm
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W Martin C Klop
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Buma AIG, Muller M, de Vries R, Sterk PJ, van der Noort V, Wolf-Lansdorf M, Farzan N, Baas P, van den Heuvel MM. eNose analysis for early immunotherapy response monitoring in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2021; 160:36-43. [PMID: 34399166 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Exhaled breath analysis by electronic nose (eNose) has shown to be a potential predictive biomarker before start of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). We hypothesized that the eNose could also be used as an early monitoring tool to identify responders more accurately at early stage of treatment when compared to baseline. In this proof-of-concept study we aimed to definitely discriminate responders from non-responders after six weeks of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective observational study in patients with advanced NSCLC eligible for anti-PD-1 treatment. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 at 3-month follow-up. We analyzed SpiroNose exhaled breath data of 94 patients (training cohort n = 62, validation cohort n = 32). Data analysis involved signal processing and statistics based on Independent Samples T-tests and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) followed by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS In the training cohort, a specificity of 73% was obtained at a 100% sensitivity level to identify objective responders. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.95 (CI: 0.89-1.00). In the validation cohort, these results were confirmed with an AUC of 0.97 (CI: 0.91-1.00). CONCLUSION Exhaled breath analysis by eNose early during treatment allows for a highly accurate, non-invasive and low-cost identification of advanced NSCLC patients who benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mirte Muller
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rianne de Vries
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Breathomix B.V. (www.breathomix.com), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Peter J Sterk
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Niloufar Farzan
- Breathomix B.V. (www.breathomix.com), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Muller M, Hoogendoorn R, Moritz RJG, van der Noort V, Lanfermeijer M, Korse CM, van den Broek D, Ten Hoeve JJ, Baas P, van Rossum HH, van den Heuvel MM. Validation of a clinical blood-based decision aid to guide immunotherapy treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol 2021; 43:115-127. [PMID: 34219680 DOI: 10.3233/tub-211504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The widespread introduction of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to durable responses but still many patients fail and are treated beyond progression. OBJECTIVE This study investigated whether readily available blood-based tumor biomarkers allow accurate detection of early non-responsiveness, allowing a timely switch of therapy and cost reduction. METHODS In a prospective, observational study in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, five serum tumor markers were measured at baseline and every other week. Six months disease control as determined by RECIST was used as a measure of clinical response. Patients with a disease control < 6 months were deemed non-responsive. For every separate tumor marker a criterion for predicting of non-response was developed. Each marker test was defined as positive (predictive of non-response) if the value of that tumor marker increased at least 50% from the value at baseline and above a marker dependent minimum value to be determined. Also, tests based on combination of multiple markers were designed. Specificity and sensitivity for predicting non-response was calculated and results were validated in an independent cohort. The target specificity of the test for detecting non-response was set at > 95%, in order to allow its safe use for treatment decisions. RESULTS A total of 376 patients (training cohort: 180, validation cohort: 196) were included in our analysis. Results for the specificity of the single marker tests in the validation set were CEA: 98·3% (95% CI: 90·9-100%), NSE: 96·5% (95% CI: 87·9-99·6%), SCC: 96·5% (95% CI: 88·1-99·6%), Cyfra21·1 : 91.8% (95% CI: 81·9-97·3%), and CA125 : 86·0% (95% CI: 74·2-93·7%). A test based on the combination of Cyfra21.1, CEA and NSE accurately predicted non-response in 32.3% (95% CI 22.6-43.1%) of patients 6 weeks after start of immunotherapy. Survival analysis showed a significant difference between predicted responders (Median PFS: 237 days (95% CI 184-289 days)) and non-responders (Median PFS: 58 days (95% CI 46-70 days)) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Serum tumor marker based tests can be used for accurate detection of non-response in NSCLC, thereby allowing early and safe discontinuation of immunotherapy in a significant subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte Muller
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Hoogendoorn
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben J G Moritz
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirthe Lanfermeijer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Catharina M Korse
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle J Ten Hoeve
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Huub H van Rossum
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel M van den Heuvel
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Respiratory Diseases, Radboud Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van der Zande K, van der Noort V, Busard M, Hamberg P, Ras - van Spijk S, De Feijter J, Dezentjé VO, Tascilar M, Houtsma D, Beeker A, van den Berg HP, ten Oever D, Oving IM, Zwart W, Bergman AM. First results from a randomized phase II study of cabazitaxel (CBZ) versus an androgen receptor targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with poor-prognosis castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5059 Background: In the OSTRICh trial, poor-prognosis mCRPC patients were randomized between CBZ and ARTA, following progression on docetaxel (DOC) treatment. Methods: The OSTRICh trial is an open label, multicenter, phase IIb study. Patients with poor-prognosis mCRPC (visceral metastases AND/OR < 12 months responsive to androgen deprivation AND/OR progressing during or within 6 months after DOC completion), were randomized 1:1 between CBZ (25 mg/m2 IV Q3W and prednisone 2 d 5 mg PO) and ARTA (daily abiraterone 1000 mg and prednisone 2 d 5 mg PO OR enzalutamide 160 mg PO). Life prolonging therapy between DOC and randomization was not allowed. Primary endpoint was to establish the Clinical Benefit Rate (no radiotherapy, no ECOG PS increase ≥2, no change of therapy AND no radiological progression) at 12 weeks (CBR) in the study arms, while formal comparison of the CBR was a secondary endpoint. A Fisher Exact test was used to assess differences in rates and a log rank test to assess differences in progression free and overall survival. All time to event endpoints were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and censored at last follow-up. Results: A total of 106 patients were randomized, 53 in each arm. Baseline median age was 70 (IQR 67-75) years and PSA 79.4 (IQR 29.0 - 160) ng/ml. ECOG PS score was 0/1 in 99 (93%) and 2 in 7 (7%) patients. Al patients fulfilled the criteria for poor-prognosis disease. Thirty-six (34%) patients received DOC in the metastatic hormone sensitive stage, while 41 (39%) previously received ARTA. Twenty-six of 43 evaluable patients in the CBZ arm had clinical benefit at 12 weeks (CBR: 60%, 95% CI: 44%-75%) and 20 of 39 (CBR: 51%, 95% CI: 35%-68%) in the ARTA arm (p = 0.50). At 12 weeks, 30 of 34 (88%, 95% CI: 73% - 97%) patients in the CBZ arm and 24 of 36 (67%, 95% CI: 49% - 81%) patients in the ARTA arm had no radiological progression (p = 0.046). After a median follow-up of 16.4 months (95% CI: 13.6–27.8), a serum PSA decrease ≥50% from baseline was established in 12 (23%, 95% CI: 12% - 36%) and 26 (49%, 95% CI: 35% - 63%)(p = 0.008) patients treated with CBZ and ARTA, respectively. Median radiological progression free survival (rPFS) was 6.0 months (95%CI: 4.11-14.5) in the CBZ arm and 5.8 months (95% CI: 5.22-10.2) months in the ARTA arm (p = 0.5), while median overall survival (OS) was 15.3 months (95%CI 9.49-22.4) and 13.8 months (95%CI 11.7-16.4) in CBZ and ARTA treated patients, respectively (p = 0.8). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 15 (29%) and 8 (15%) of patients treated with CBZ and ARTA, respectively. Conclusions: No significant difference in CBR was established between CBZ and ARTA treated patients. However, at 12 weeks significantly more CBZ treated patients had no radiological progression, while ≥50% PSA response rates were higher in ARTA treated patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03295565.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Milou Busard
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Hamberg
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeantine De Feijter
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Vincent O. Dezentjé
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wilbert Zwart
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Andre M. Bergman
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Berger DMS, Verver D, van der Noort V, Grünhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Al-Mamgani A, Zuur CL, van Akkooi ACJ, Balm AJM, Klop WMC. Therapeutic neck dissection in head and neck melanoma patients: Comparing extent of surgery and clinical outcome in two cohorts. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2454-2459. [PMID: 33867173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent of surgical management of regional lymph nodes in the treatment of cutaneous head and neck melanoma on and anterior to O'Brien's watershed line is controversial. By comparing patients' cohorts of two separate melanoma expert centers we investigate the effectiveness of comprehensive versus (super-) selective neck dissection approach. METHODS Sixty patients with macroscopic (palpable) neck node metastases (N2b) from anterior scalp and face melanoma were retrospectively studied. Forty therapeutic modified radical neck dissections (MRND; levels I-V) combined with elective parotidectomy from The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NCI) were compared with 16 (super-) selective neck dissections [(S)SND; 3-4 levels] and 4 solely MRNDs from Erasmus Medical Center (EMC). Cohorts were analyzed for site of recurrence, overall survival (OS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Clinical characteristics of patients were equal in both groups. In the NCI cohort 62.5% (n = 25) of patients recurred versus 65% (n = 13) in the EMC cohort. None of the NCI recurrences affected the parotid gland in contrast to 3 patients in the EMC group. Survival characteristics were not different between the two groups: OS (p = 0.56), MSS (p = 0.98), DFS (p = 0.92). CONCLUSION This study does not support to continue the practice of routine elective parotidectomy and MRND in melanoma patients undergoing a lymph node dissection for macroscopic (palpable) nodal disease and justifies (S)SND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danique M S Berger
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Danielle Verver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Zuur
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alfons J M Balm
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W Martin C Klop
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vessies DCL, Linders TC, Lanfermeijer M, Ramkisoensing KL, van der Noort V, Schouten RD, Meijer GA, van den Heuvel MM, Monkhorst K, van den Broek D. An Automated Correction Algorithm (ALPACA) for ddPCR Data Using Adaptive Limit of Blank and Correction of False Positive Events Improves Specificity of Mutation Detection. Clin Chem 2021; 67:959-967. [PMID: 33842952 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bio-Rad droplet-digital PCR is a highly sensitive method that can be used to detect tumor mutations in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of patients with cancer. Correct interpretation of ddPCR results is important for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Despite its widespread use, no standardized method to interpret ddPCR data is available, nor have technical artifacts affecting ddPCR results been widely studied. METHODS False positive rates were determined for 6 ddPCR assays at variable amounts of input DNA, revealing polymerase induced false positive events (PIFs) and other false positives. An in silico correction algorithm, known as the adaptive LoB and PIFs: an automated correction algorithm (ALPACA), was developed to remove PIFs and apply an adaptive limit of blank (LoB) to individual samples. Performance of ALPACA was compared to a standard strategy (no PIF correction and static LoB = 3) using data from commercial reference DNA, healthy volunteer cfDNA, and cfDNA from a real-life cohort of 209 patients with stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumor and cfDNA had been molecularly profiled. RESULTS Applying ALPACA reduced false positive results in healthy cfDNA compared to the standard strategy (specificity 98 vs 88%, P = 10-5) and stage IV NSCLC patient cfDNA (99 vs 93%, P = 10-11), while not affecting sensitivity in commercial reference DNA (70 vs 68% P = 0.77) or patient cfDNA (82 vs 88%, P = 0.13). Overall accuracy in patient samples was improved (98 vs 92%, P = 10-7). CONCLUSIONS Correction of PIFs and application of an adaptive LoB increases specificity without a loss of sensitivity in ddPCR, leading to a higher accuracy in a real-life cohort of patients with stage IV NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan C L Vessies
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Theodora C Linders
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirthe Lanfermeijer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Robert D Schouten
- Department of Pulmonology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ottenhof SR, Djajadiningrat RS, Versleijen MWJ, Donswijk ML, van der Noort V, Brouwer OR, Graafland NM, Vegt E, Horenblas S. F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography Has High Diagnostic Value for Pelvic and Distant Staging in Patients with High-risk Penile Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:98-104. [PMID: 33685842 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For penile cancer patients with pelvic metastases, multimodal treatment is advised, but pelvic lymph node metastases are often found upon surgical resection only. Early selection for multimodal treatment requires reliable noninvasive staging. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for staging pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases in high-risk penile cancer patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS FDG-PET/CT scans performed in patients with clinically overt inguinal lymph node metastases and/or high-risk primary tumors (bulky T3 or T4) were retrospectively analyzed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All scans were reviewed by two independent nuclear medicine physicians staging the pelvic nodes and distant metastases. FDG-PET/CT findings were compared with histology after node dissection if available, or with positive imaging or follow-up of at least 1 yr. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between 2006 and 2016, 61 patients met the inclusion criteria. For staging of pelvic nodes, sensitivity was 85% (specificity 75%, negative predictive value [NPV] 90%, and positive predictive value [PPV] 65%). For the detection of distant metastases, FDG-PET/CT had a PPV of 93%. Results are limited by the retrospective design and the lack of direct comparison with CT scanning alone. CONCLUSIONS FDG-PET/CT has high sensitivity and a high NPV for staging of pelvic lymph nodes in high-risk penile cancer. It also has a high PPV for the detection of distant metastases, which were found in 23% of patients. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT enables early selection for multimodal treatment of patients with pelvic metastases and may help avoid futile treatment of patients with distant metastases. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied whether positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans in patients with advanced penile cancer can detect metastases before lymph node surgery is done. PET/CT scans can detect or rule out pelvic lymph node metastases, and can detect distant metastases. This helps in making timely treatment decisions (before surgery).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Ottenhof
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Oscar R Brouwer
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niels M Graafland
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Witlox WJA, Ramaekers BLT, Lacas B, Le Pechoux C, Pignon JP, Sun A, Wang SY, Hu C, Redman M, van der Noort V, Li N, Guckenberger M, van Tinteren H, Groen HJM, Joore MA, De Ruysscher DKM. Individual patient data meta-analysis of prophylactic cranial irradiation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:40-47. [PMID: 33587968 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was compared to observation in several randomized trials (RCTs), and a reduction greater than 50% was shown regarding the incidence of brain metastases (BM). However, none of these studies showed an improvement of overall survival (OS), possibly related to relatively small sample sizes and short follow-up. The aim of this meta-analysis was therefore to assess the impact of PCI on long term OS for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to observation based on the pooled updated individual patient RCT data. METHODS Seven RCTs were eligible, and data from the four most recent trials (924 patients) could be retrieved. The log-rank observed minus expected number of events and its variance were used to calculate individual and overall pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) with a fixed effects model. Inter-trial heterogeneity was studied using the I2 test. In addition, the 5-year absolute survival difference between arms was calculated for all endpoints. The pre-specified toxicities were reported descriptively. RESULTS The median follow-up was 97 months (74-108). Compared to observation, no statistically significant impact of PCI on OS was observed (HR 0.90 [0.76-1.07] p = 0.23, 5-year absolute difference 1.8% [-5.2-8.8]). PCI significantly prolonged progression-free survival (HR 0.77 [0.66-0.91] p = 0.002) and BM-free survival (HR 0.82 [0.69-0.97] p = 0.02). The number of patients with high-grade (≥3) toxicity was 6.4% (21/330) for PCI. CONCLUSION No OS benefit by PCI was observed, but PCI prolonged the progression-free survival and BM-free survival at an increased risk of late memory impairment and fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem J A Witlox
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands.
| | - Bram L T Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Cecile Le Pechoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexander Sun
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Si-Yu Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Hu
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, United States; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Mary Redman
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), The Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk K M De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center(+), GROW Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Joosten PJM, Dickhoff C, van der Noort V, Klomp HM, van Diessen JNA, Dahele M, Bahce I, Veenhof AAFA, Smit EF, Hartemink KJ. Is pneumonectomy justifiable for patients with a locoregional recurrence or persistent disease after curative intent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer? Lung Cancer 2020; 150:209-215. [PMID: 33220611 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Locoregional recurrence and persistent/progressive disease after curative-intent definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is challenging to manage, as salvage options are limited. Selected patients might be candidates for resection. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients after salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence, focusing specifically on morbidity and mortality after salvage pneumonectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included patients from 2 tertiary referral hospitals who underwent salvage pulmonary resection for locoregional recurrence or disease persistence/progression >12 weeks after completion of curative intent high dose (>60 Gy) CRT. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and the influence of patient and treatment characteristics on these endpoints was assessed. RESULTS A total of 30 patients treated between 2015-2017 were identified with a median age of 60 years (range 42-72 years), 67 % were male. Median follow-up was 47 months (95 % CI 46-NR). Pneumonectomy was performed in 13/30 (43 %) patients and lobectomy in 17/30 (57 %). Median DFS and OS after pneumonectomy/lobectomy were 14/6 and NR/17 months, respectively. 30 and 90-day mortality for pneumonectomy/lobectomy were 0/12 % and 0/24 % respectively. More favorable survival was seen after pathologically radical resection, i.e. R0, and when surgery was performed more than 12 months after completion of CRT. CONCLUSION Salvage surgery, including pneumonectomy is associated with acceptable outcomes in selected patients with recurrent or persistent/progressive NSCLC after curative-intent high dose CRT. Patients should be assessed for the probability of an R0 resection, and patients with a locoregional recurrence more than 12 months after treatment with CRT may benefit most from salvage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter J M Joosten
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chris Dickhoff
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Houke M Klomp
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judi N A van Diessen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Max Dahele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Idris Bahce
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander A F A Veenhof
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Egbert F Smit
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen J Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Arends CR, Petersen JF, van der Noort V, Timmermans AJ, Leemans CR, de Bree R, van den Brekel MW, Stuiver MM. Optimizing Survival Predictions of Hypopharynx Cancer: Development of a Clinical Prediction Model. Laryngoscope 2020; 130:2166-2172. [PMID: 31693181 PMCID: PMC7496756 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate a clinical prediction model (CPM) for survival in hypopharynx cancer, thereby aiming to improve individualized estimations of survival. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of hypopharynx cancer patients. We randomly split the cohort into a derivation and validation dataset. The model was fitted on the derivation dataset and validated on the validation dataset. We used a Cox's proportional hazard model and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) selection. Performance (discrimination and calibration) of the CPM was tested. RESULTS The final model consisted of gender, subsite, TNM classification, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 score (ACE27), body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin, albumin, and leukocyte count. Of these, TNM classification, ACE27, BMI, hemoglobin, and albumin had independent significant associations with survival. The C Statistic was 0.62 after validation. The model could significantly identify clinical risk groups. CONCLUSIONS ACE27, BMI, hemoglobin, and albumin are independent predictors of overall survival. The identification of high-risk patients can be used in the counseling process and tailoring of treatment strategy or follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2166-2172, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coralie R. Arends
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Japke F. Petersen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Adriana J. Timmermans
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - C. René Leemans
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Michiel W.M. van den Brekel
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute of Phonetic SciencesAmsterdam Center of Language and Communication, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAcademic Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Martijn M. Stuiver
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and BioinformaticsAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Brouns AJWM, Hendriks LEL, van der Noort V, van de Borne BEEM, Schramel FMNH, Groen HJM, Biesma B, Smit HJM, Dingemans AMC. Efficacy of Ibandronate Loading Dose on Rapid Pain Relief in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Cancer Induced Bone Pain: The NVALT-9 Trial. Front Oncol 2020; 10:890. [PMID: 32670872 PMCID: PMC7326766 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Approximately 80% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with bone metastases have cancer induced bone pain (CIBP). Methods: The NVALT-9 was an open-label, single arm, phase II, multicenter study. Main inclusion criterion: bone metastasized NSCLC patients with uncontrolled CIBP [brief pain inventory [BPI] ≥ 5 over last 7 days]. Patients were treated with six milligram ibandronate intravenously (day 1–3) once a day. Main exclusion criteria: active secondary malignancy, systemic anti-tumor treatment and radiotherapy ≤4 weeks before study start, previous bisphosphonate treatment. Statistics: Simon's Optimal two-stage design with a 90% power to declare the treatment active if the pain response rate is ≥ 80% and 95% confidence to declare the treatment inactive if the pain response rate is ≤ 60%. If pain response is observed in ≤ 12 of the first 19 patients further enrollment will be stopped. Primary endpoint: bone pain response, defined as 25% decrease in worst pain score (PSc) over a 3-day period (day 5–7) compared to baseline PSc with maximum of 25% increase in mean analgesic consumption during the same period. Secondary endpoints: BPI score, quality of life, toxicity and World Health Organization Performance Score. Results: Of the 19 enrolled patients in the first stage, 18 were evaluable for response. All completed ibandronate treatment according to protocol. In 4 (22.2%), a bone pain response was observed. According to the stopping rule, further enrollment was halted. Discussion: Ibandronate loading doses lead to insufficient pain relief in NSCLC patients with CIBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita J W M Brouns
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Harry J M Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bonne Biesma
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Hans J M Smit
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kruger DT, Opdam M, Sanders J, van der Noort V, Boven E, Linn SC. Hierarchical clustering of PI3K and MAPK pathway proteins in breast cancer intrinsic subtypes. APMIS 2020; 128:298-307. [PMID: 31976581 PMCID: PMC7317370 DOI: 10.1111/apm.13026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase (PI3K) and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways are frequently activated in breast cancer. We recently demonstrated the importance of analyzing multiple proteins as read‐out for pathway activation in ER+/HER2− breast cancer, since single proteins are known to provide insufficient information. Here, we determined pathway activation in other primary breast cancer intrinsic subtypes derived from postmenopausal patients. Tumor blocks were recollected, and immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against PTEN, p‐AKT(Thr308), p‐AKT(Ser473), p‐p70S6K, p‐4EBP1, p‐S6RP(Ser235/236) and p‐ERK1/2, followed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. In 32 ER+/HER2+, 37 ER−/HER2+ and 74 triple‐negative breast cancer patients, subgroups were identified with preferentially activated (A) and preferentially not activated (N) proteins. These subgroups likely reflect tumors with differences in biological behavior as well as treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinja T Kruger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Opdam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Division of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Epie Boven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Badrising SK, Louhanepessy RD, van der Noort V, Coenen JLLM, Hamberg P, Beeker A, Wagenaar N, Lam MGEH, Celik F, Loosveld OJL, Oostdijk A, Zuetenhorst H, Haanen JB, Vegt E, Zwart W, Bergman AM. A prospective observational registry evaluating clinical outcomes of Radium-223 treatment in a nonstudy population. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1143-1151. [PMID: 31875956 PMCID: PMC7383569 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The ALSYMPCA study established a 3.6 month Overall Survival (OS) benefit in metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with Radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) over placebo. Here we report clinical outcomes of Ra-223 treatment in a nonstudy population. In this prospective registry, patients from 20 Dutch hospitals were included prior to Ra-223 treatment. Clinical parameters collected included previous treatments and Adverse Events. Primary outcome was 6 months Symptomatic Skeletal Event (SSE)-free survival, while secondary outcomes included Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Of the 305 patients included, 300 were evaluable. The mean age was 73.6 years, 90% had ≥6 bone metastases and 74.1% were pretreated with Docetaxel, 19.5% with Cabazitaxel and 80.5% with Abiraterone and/or Enzalutamide. Of all patients, 96.7% were treated with Ra-223 and received a median of 5 cycles. After a median follow-up of 13.2 months, 6 months SSE-free survival rate was 83%, median PFS was 5.1 months and median OS was 15.2 months. Six months SSE-free survival rate and OS were comparable with those reported in ALSYMPCA. "Previous Cabazitaxel treatment" and "bone-only metastases" were independent predictors of a shorter and longer PFS, respectively, while above-median LDH and "bone-only metastases" were independent predictors of shorter and longer OS, respectively. Toxicity was similar as reported in the ALSYMPCA trial. These results suggest that in a nonstudy population, Ra-223 treatment is well-tolerated, equally effective as in the ALSYMPCA population and that patients not previously treated with Cabazitaxel benefit most from Ra-223.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushil K Badrising
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca D Louhanepessy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Paul Hamberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart Beeker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Nils Wagenaar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Filiz Celik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf J L Loosveld
- Department or Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Ad Oostdijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Zuetenhorst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - John B Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Oncogenomics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vredevoogd DW, Kuilman T, Ligtenberg MA, Boshuizen J, Stecker KE, de Bruijn B, Krijgsman O, Huang X, Kenski JCN, Lacroix R, Mezzadra R, Gomez-Eerland R, Yildiz M, Dagidir I, Apriamashvili G, Zandhuis N, van der Noort V, Visser NL, Blank CU, Altelaar M, Schumacher TN, Peeper DS. Augmenting Immunotherapy Impact by Lowering Tumor TNF Cytotoxicity Threshold. Cell 2020; 180:404-405. [PMID: 31978349 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
46
|
Kruger DT, Alexi X, Opdam M, Schuurman K, Voorwerk L, Sanders J, van der Noort V, Boven E, Zwart W, Linn SC. IGF-1R pathway activation as putative biomarker for linsitinib therapy to revert tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:2348-2359. [PMID: 31490549 PMCID: PMC7065127 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical studies indicate that activated IGF-1R can drive endocrine resistance in ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer, but its clinical relevance is unknown. We studied the effect of IGF-1R signaling on tamoxifen benefit in patients and we searched for approaches to overcome IGF-1R-mediated tamoxifen failure in cell lines. Primary tumor blocks from postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients randomized between adjuvant tamoxifen versus nil were recollected. Immunohistochemistry for IGF-1R, p-IGF-1R/InsR, p-ERα(Ser118), p-ERα(Ser167) and PI3K/MAPK pathway proteins was performed. Multivariate Cox models were employed to assess tamoxifen efficacy. The association between p-IGF-1R/InsR and PI3K/MAPK pathway activation in MCF-7 and T47D cells was analyzed with Western blots. Cell proliferation experiments were performed under various growth-stimulating and -inhibiting conditions. Patients with ER+, IGF-1R-positive breast cancer without p-IGF-1R/InsR staining (n = 242) had tamoxifen benefit (HR 0.41, p = 0.0038), while the results for p-IGF-1R/InsR-positive patients (n = 125) were not significant (HR 0.95, p = 0.3). High p-ERα(Ser118) or p-ERα(Ser167) expression was associated with less tamoxifen benefit. In MCF-7 cells, IGF-1R stimulation increased phosphorylation of PI3K/MAPK proteins and ERα(Ser167) regardless of IGF-1R overexpression. This could be abrogated by the dual IGF-1R/InsR inhibitor linsitinib, but not by the IGF-IR-selective antibody 1H7. In MCF-7 and T47D cells, stimulation of the IGF-1R/InsR pathway resulted in cell proliferation regardless of tamoxifen. Abrogation of cell growth was regained by addition of linsitinib. In conclusion, p-IGF-1R/InsR positivity in ER+ breast cancer is associated with reduced benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients. In cell lines, stimulation rather than overexpression of IGF-1R is driving tamoxifen resistance to be abrogated by linsitinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinja T Kruger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Xanthippi Alexi
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Opdam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karianne Schuurman
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Voorwerk
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Division of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Epie Boven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, The National Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Theelen WSME, Peulen HMU, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, Aerts JGJV, Dumoulin DW, Bahce I, Niemeijer ALN, de Langen AJ, Monkhorst K, Baas P. Effect of Pembrolizumab After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Alone on Tumor Response in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the PEMBRO-RT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5:1276-1282. [PMID: 31294749 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 567] [Impact Index Per Article: 113.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immunotherapy show primary resistance. High-dose radiotherapy can lead to increased tumor antigen release, improved antigen presentation, and T-cell infiltration. This radiotherapy may enhance the effects of checkpoint inhibition. Objective To assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy on a single tumor site preceding pembrolizumab treatment enhances tumor response in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, randomized phase 2 study (PEMBRO-RT) of 92 patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled between July 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Data analysis was of the intention-to-treat population. Interventions Pembrolizumab (200 mg/kg every 3 weeks) either alone (control arm) or after radiotherapy (3 doses of 8 Gy) (experimental arm) to a single tumor site until confirmed radiographic progression, unacceptable toxic effects, investigator decision, patient withdrawal of consent, or a maximum of 24 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Improvement in overall response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks from 20% in the control arm to 50% in the experimental arm with P < .10. Results Of the 92 patients enrolled, 76 were randomized to the control arm (n = 40) or the experimental arm (n = 36). Of those, the median age was 62 years (range, 35-78 years), and 44 (58%) were men. The ORR at 12 weeks was 18% in the control arm vs 36% in the experimental arm (P = .07). Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.7-6.9 months) vs 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.0-14.6 months) (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-1.18; P = .19), and median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.0-13.9 months) vs 15.9 months (95% CI, 7.1 months to not reached) (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.37-1.18; P = .16). Subgroup analyses showed the largest benefit from the addition of radiotherapy in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. No increase in treatment-related toxic effects was observed in the experimental arm. Conclusions and Relevance Stereotactic body radiotherapy prior to pembrolizumab was well tolerated. Although a doubling of ORR was observed, the results did not meet the study's prespecified end point criteria for meaningful clinical benefit. Positive results were largely influenced by the PD-L1-negative subgroup, which had significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival. These results suggest that a larger trial is necessary to determine whether radiotherapy may activate noninflamed NSCLC toward a more inflamed tumor microenvironment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02492568.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heike M U Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ferry Lalezari
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | | | | | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne W Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Idris Bahce
- Department of Pulmonology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vredevoogd DW, Kuilman T, Ligtenberg MA, Boshuizen J, Stecker KE, de Bruijn B, Krijgsman O, Huang X, Kenski JCN, Lacroix R, Mezzadra R, Gomez-Eerland R, Yildiz M, Dagidir I, Apriamashvili G, Zandhuis N, van der Noort V, Visser NL, Blank CU, Altelaar M, Schumacher TN, Peeper DS. Augmenting Immunotherapy Impact by Lowering Tumor TNF Cytotoxicity Threshold. Cell 2019; 178:585-599.e15. [PMID: 31303383 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
New opportunities are needed to increase immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) benefit. Whereas the interferon (IFN)γ pathway harbors both ICB resistance factors and therapeutic opportunities, this has not been systematically investigated for IFNγ-independent signaling routes. A genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen to sensitize IFNγ receptor-deficient tumor cells to CD8 T cell elimination uncovered several hits mapping to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) pathway. Clinically, we show that TNF antitumor activity is only limited in tumors at baseline and in ICB non-responders, correlating with its low abundance. Taking advantage of the genetic screen, we demonstrate that ablation of the top hit, TRAF2, lowers the TNF cytotoxicity threshold in tumors by redirecting TNF signaling to favor RIPK1-dependent apoptosis. TRAF2 loss greatly enhanced the therapeutic potential of pharmacologic inhibition of its interaction partner cIAP, another screen hit, thereby cooperating with ICB. Our results suggest that selective reduction of the TNF cytotoxicity threshold increases the susceptibility of tumors to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Vredevoogd
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Kuilman
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten A Ligtenberg
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julia Boshuizen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kelly E Stecker
- Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Beaunelle de Bruijn
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oscar Krijgsman
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Xinyao Huang
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Juliana C N Kenski
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ruben Lacroix
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Mezzadra
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raquel Gomez-Eerland
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mete Yildiz
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ilknur Dagidir
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Georgi Apriamashvili
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nordin Zandhuis
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Division of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nils L Visser
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian U Blank
- Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten Altelaar
- Proteomics Facility, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ton N Schumacher
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel S Peeper
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Oncode Institute, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fransen van de Putte EE, Pos F, Doodeman B, van Rhijn BWG, van der Laan E, Nederlof P, van der Heijden MS, Bloos-van der Hulst J, Sanders J, Broeks A, Kerst JM, van der Noort V, Horenblas S, Bergman AM. Concurrent Radiotherapy and Panitumumab after Lymph Node Dissection and Induction Chemotherapy for Invasive Bladder Cancer. J Urol 2019; 201:478-485. [PMID: 30321552 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this prospective study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy and panitumumab following neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy and pelvic lymph node dissection as a bladder preserving therapy for invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with cT1-4N0-2M0 bladder cancer were treated with pelvic lymph node dissection and 4 cycles of platinum based induction chemotherapy followed by a 6½-week schedule of weekly panitumumab (2.5 mg/kg) and concurrent radiotherapy to the bladder (33 × 2 Gy). As the primary objective we compared concurrent radiotherapy and panitumumab toxicity to a historical control toxicity rate of concurrent cisplatin/radiotherapy (less than 35% of patients with Grade 3-5 toxicity). A sample size of 31 patients was estimated. Secondary end points included complete remission at 3-month followup, the bladder preservation rate, EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) expression and RAS mutational status. RESULTS Of the 38 cases initially included in this study 34 were staged cN0. After pelvic lymph node dissection 7 cases (21%) were up staged to pN+. Of the 38 patients 31 started concurrent radiotherapy and panitumumab. During concurrent radiotherapy and panitumumab 5 patients (16%, 95% CI 0-31) experienced systemic or local grade 3-4 toxicity. Four patients did not complete treatment due to adverse events. Complete remission was achieved in 29 of 31 patients (94%, 95% CI 83-100). At a median followup of 34 months 4 patients had local recurrence, for which 3 (10%) underwent salvage cystectomy. Two tumors showed EGFR or RAS mutation while 84% showed positive EGFR expression. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent radiotherapy and panitumumab following induction chemotherapy and pelvic lymph node dissection has a safety profile that is noninferior to the historical profile of concurrent cisplatin/radiotherapy. The high complete remission and bladder preservation rates are promising and warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barry Doodeman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elsbeth van der Laan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Nederlof
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Petersen JF, Pézier TF, van Dieren JM, van der Noort V, van Putten T, Bril SI, Janssen L, Dirven R, van den Brekel MW, de Bree R. Dilation after laryngectomy: Incidence, risk factors and complications. Oral Oncol 2019; 91:107-112. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|