A linearly decreasing deterministic annealing algorithm for the multi-vehicle dial-a-ride problem

Dial a ride problem (DARP) is a complex version of the pick-up and delivery problem with many practical applications in the field of transportation. This study proposes an enhanced deterministic annealing algorithm for the solution of large-scale multi-vehicle DARPs. The proposed method always explores the feasible search space; therefore, a feasible solution is guaranteed at any point of termination. This method utilises advanced local search operators to accelerate the search for optimal solutions and it relies on a linearly decreasing deterministic annealing schedule to limit poor jumps during the course of search. This study puts forward a systematic series of experiments to compare the performance of solution methods from various angles. The proposed method is compared with the most efficient methods reported in the literature i.e., the Adaptive Large Neighbourhood Search (ALNS), Evolutionary Local Search (ELS), and Deterministic Annealing (DA) using standard benchmarks. The results suggest that the proposed algorithm is on average faster than the state-of-the-art algorithms in reaching competitive objective values across the range of benchmarks.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 2.2024

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the systemic therapy options for patients with advanced RCC and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer.

Acquired Radiation Resistance Induces Thiol-dependent Cisplatin Cross-resistance

Resistance to radiation remains a significant clinical challenge in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). It is therefore important to identify the underlying molecular and cellular features that drive acquired resistance. We generated genetically matched NSCLC cell lines to investigate characteristics of acquired resistance. Murine Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) and human A549 cells acquired an approximate 1.5-2.5-fold increase in radiation resistance as compared to their parental match, which each had unique intrinsic radio-sensitivities. The radiation resistance (RR) was reflected in higher levels of DNA damage and repair marker γH2AX and reduced apoptosis induction after radiation. Morphologically, we found that radiation resistance A549 (A549-RR) cells exhibited a greater nucleus-to-cytosol (N/C) ratio as compared to its parental counterpart. Since the N/C ratio is linked to the differentiation state, we next investigated the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype and cellular plasticity. We found that A549 cells had a greater radiation-induced plasticity, as measured by E-cadherin, vimentin and double-positive (DP) modulation, as compared to LLC. Additionally, migration was suppressed in A549-RR cells, as compared to A549 cells. Subsequently, we confirmed in vivo that the LLC-RR and A549-RR cells are also more resistance to radiation than their isogenic-matched counterpart. Moreover, we found that the acquired radiation resistance also induced resistance to cisplatin, but not carboplatin or oxaliplatin. This cross-resistance was attributed to induced elevation of thiol levels. Gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase inhibitor buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) sensitized the resistant cells to cisplatin by decreasing the amount of thiols to levels prior to obtaining acquired radiation resistance. By generating radiation-resistance genetically matched NSCLC we were able to identify and overcome cisplatin cross-resistance. This is an important finding arguing for combinatorial treatment regimens including glutathione pathway disruptors in patients with the potential of improving clinical outcomes in the future.

A Comprehensive Review of Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination, Novel Antibodies, Cellular Therapies, and Vaccines

Urothelial cancer is an immune-responsive cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibition. Currently, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the combination of pembrolizumab with the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin are approved to treat patients with metastatic UC (mUC). Approval of first-line nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin is expected imminently. Many treatment approaches are being investigated to better harness the immune system to fight mUC. In this review, we summarize the landmark clinical trials of ICIs that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for mUC. We further discuss recent and ongoing clinical trials in mUC, which are investigating ICIs in combination with other agents, including chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Lastly, we review novel approaches utilizing bispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and vaccines. The landscape of immunotherapy for mUC is rapidly evolving and will hopefully lead to better outcomes for patients.

Emerging Immunotherapy Approaches for Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

The most common subtype of renal cell carcinoma is clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). While localized ccRCC can be cured with surgery, metastatic disease has a poor prognosis. Recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach for advanced ccRCC. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving immunotherapeutic landscape for metastatic ccRCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors have demonstrated clinical efficacy as monotherapies and in combination regimens. Combination immunotherapies pairing ICIs with antiangiogenic agents, other immunomodulators, or novel therapeutic platforms such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are areas of active research. Beyond the checkpoint blockade, additional modalities including therapeutic vaccines, cytokines, and oncolytic viruses are also being explored for ccRCC. This review discusses the mechanisms, major clinical trials, challenges, and future directions for these emerging immunotherapies. While current strategies have shown promise in improving patient outcomes, continued research is critical for expanding and optimizing immunotherapy approaches for advanced ccRCC. Realizing the full potential of immunotherapy will require elucidating mechanisms of response and resistance, developing predictive biomarkers, and rationally designing combination therapeutic regimens tailored to individual patients. Advances in immunotherapy carry immense promise for transforming the management of metastatic ccRCC.

A Phase 2 Study of Sitravatinib in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) has demonstrated survival benefits in urothelial carcinoma (UC); however, not all patients benefit from CPI due to resistance. Combining sitravatinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK (TAM) receptors and VEGFR2, with CPI may improve antitumor responses. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC.

METHODS

The 516-003 trial (NCT03606174) is an open-label, multicohort phase 2 study evaluating sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC enrolled in eight cohorts depending on prior treatment with CPI, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Overall, 244 patients were enrolled and treated with sitravatinib plus nivolumab (median follow-up 14.1-38.2 mo). Sitravatinib (free-base capsules 120 mg once daily [QD] or malate capsule 100 mg QD) plus nivolumab (240 mg every 2 wk/480 mg every 4 wk intravenously).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. The Predictive probability design and confidence interval methods were used. Among patients previously treated with PBC, ORR, and median PFS were 32.1% and 3.9 mo in CPI-naïve patients (n = 53), 14.9% and 3.9 mo in CPI-refractory patients (n = 67), and 5.4% and 3.7 mo in CPI- and ADC-refractory patients (n = 56), respectively. Across all cohorts, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 51.2% patients and grade 4 in 3.3%, with one treatment-related death (cardiac failure). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 50.4% patients. TRAEs led to sitravatinib/nivolumab discontinuation in 6.1% patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Sitravatinib plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile but did not result in clinically meaningful ORRs in patients with advanced/metastatic UC in the eight cohorts studied.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, the combination of two anticancer drugs, sitravatinib and nivolumab, resulted in manageable side effects but no meaningful responses in patients with bladder cancer.

Clinical guideline highlights for the hospitalist: Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

GUIDELINE TITLE

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update RELEASE DATE: November 1, 2021 PRIOR VERSION(S): February 14, 2018 DEVELOPER: American Society of Clinical Oncology FUNDING SOURCE: American Society of Clinical Oncology TARGET POPULATION: Adult patients with cancer receiving treatment with immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors alone.

Emerging Immunotherapy Approaches for Treating Prostate Cancer

Immunotherapy has emerged as an important approach for cancer treatment, but its clinical efficacy has been limited in prostate cancer compared to other malignancies. This review summarizes key immunotherapy strategies under evaluation for prostate cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific T cell-engaging antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, therapeutic vaccines, and cytokines. For each modality, the rationale stemming from preclinical studies is discussed along with outcomes from completed clinical trials and strategies to improve clinical efficacy that are being tested in ongoing clinical trials. Imperative endeavors include biomarker discovery for patient selection, deciphering resistance mechanisms, refining cellular therapies such as CAR T cells, and early-stage intervention were reviewed. These ongoing efforts instill optimism that immunotherapy may eventually deliver significant clinical benefits and expand treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Outcomes of Second-Line Therapies in Patients With Metastatic de Novo and Treatment-Emergent Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study

BACKGROUND

De novo neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) and treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (T-NEPC) are rare diseases with a poor prognosis. After first-line platinum chemotherapy, there is no consensus on second-line treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of de novo NEPC or T-NEPC between 2000 and 2020 who received first-line platinum and any second-line systemic therapy were selected and standardized clinical data was collected via the electronic health record at each institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) based on second-line therapy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) to second-line therapy, PSA response, and time on treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (32 de novo NEPC, 26 T-NEPC) from 8 institutions were included. At de novo NEPC or T-NEPC diagnosis, the overall cohort had a median age of 65.0 years (IQR 59.2-70.3) and median PSA of 3.0 ng/dL (IQR 0.6-17.9). Following first-line platinum chemotherapy, 21 patients (36.2%) received platinum chemotherapy, 10 (17.2%) taxane monotherapy, 11 (19.0%) immunotherapy, 10 (17.2%) other chemotherapy, and 6 (16.2%) other systemic therapy. Among 41 evaluable patients, the ORR was 23.5%. The mOS after start of second-line therapy was 7.4 months (95% CI 6.1-11.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, patients with de novo NEPC or T-NEPC who received second-line therapy were treated with wide variety of treatment regimens, reflecting the lack of consensus in this setting. Most patients received chemotherapy-based treatments. Overall prognosis was poor and ORR was low in the second line regardless of treatment choice.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas and other sites-a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a heterogenous disease with poor 5-year overall survival (OS) at 14%. Patients with mRCC to endocrine organs historically have prolonged OS. Pancreatic metastases are uncommon overall, with mRCC being the most common etiology of pancreatic metastases. In this study, we report the long-term outcomes of patients with mRCC to the pancreas in two separate cohorts.

Methods

We performed a multicenter, international retrospective cohort study of patients with mRCC to the pancreas at 15 academic centers. Cohort 1 included 91 patients with oligometastatic disease to the pancreas. Cohort 2 included 229 patients with multiples organ sites of metastases including the pancreas. The primary endpoint for Cohorts 1 and 2 was median OS from time of metastatic disease in the pancreas until death or last follow up.

Findings

In Cohort 1, the median OS (mOS) was 121 months with a median follow up time of 42 months. Patients who underwent surgical resection of oligometastatic disease had mOS of 100 months with a median follow-up time of 52.5 months. The mOS for patients treated with systemic therapy was not reached. In Cohort 2, the mOS was 90.77 months. Patients treated with first-line (1L) VEGFR therapy had mOS of 90.77 months; patients treated with IL immunotherapy (IO) had mOS of 92 months; patients on 1L combination VEGFR/IO had mOS of 74.9 months.

Interpretations

This is the largest retrospective cohort of mRCC involving the pancreas. We confirmed the previously reported long-term outcomes in patients with oligometastatic pancreas disease and demonstrated prolonged survival in patients with multiple RCC metastases that included the pancreas. In this retrospective study with heterogeneous population treated over 2 decades, mOS was similar when stratified by first-line therapy. Future research will be needed to determine whether mRCC patients with pancreatic metastases require a different initial treatment strategy.

Funding

Statistical analyses for this study were supported in part by the University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant from the NIH/NCI, P30CA046934-30.

Characterization of FOLH1 expression in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

713

Background: The FOLH1 gene encodes prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein that is highly expressed in prostate cancer cells and on endothelial cells in the neovasculature of solid tumors, including RCC. PSMA has been used as a target for diagnostic imaging and therapeutic radioligand therapy. We utilized a database of molecularly profiled RCC tumors to evaluate associations with FOLH1 expression. Methods: NextGen sequencing of DNA (592-gene/whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome) was performed for RCC patient specimens (n=1765) through Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). FOLH1-High/Low expression were defined as ≥75th/<25th-percentile of RNA transcripts per million (TPM). Angiogenic, T-effector, and Myeloid expression signatures were calculated using previously defined gene sets (McDermott, 2018). Immune cell infiltration in tumor microenvironments (TMEs) was estimated using MCP-Counter (Becht, 2016). Tumor cell PD-L1+ expression (≥2+, ≥%5; SP142) was assessed by IHC. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated from time of tissue collection or therapy start. Results: FOLH1 expression was similar between sexes (71% male/29% female, 11.2 vs. 11.3 median TPM, p=0.54) and was not correlated with patient age at time of profiling (median 63 years, range 1-90+, spearman = 0.02, P=0.42). FOLH1 expression was significantly higher in clear cell RCC (ccRCC; 71.1% prevalence) compared to non-ccRCC tumors (19.0 vs 3.3 TPM, P<0.001). FOLH1 expression varied by specimen site (45% kidney/55% metastatic, 13.6 vs. 9.9 TPM, P<0.001), with notably lower expression in lymph nodes (5.3 TPM, P<0.001, 8.2% prevalence). FOLH1 expression was strongly correlated with angiogenic gene expression compared to T-effector and myeloid signatures (spearman = 0.76 vs 0.33 and 0.20, respectively, each P<0.001), with similar correlation strength observed for endothelial cell abundance in TMEs (spearman = 0.76 vs. 0.04-0.50 for immune cell types, P<0.001). PD-L1+ IHC frequency was numerically lower yet not significantly different in FOLH1-High compared to -Low tumor among ccRCC (10 vs. 17%, P=0.07), but was similar among non-ccRCC (31 vs 32%, P=0.95). For patients stratified by median FOLH1 expression, no difference in overall survival from time of tissue sampling was observed for ccRCC (HR 1.2, P=0.57) or non-ccRCC cohorts (HR 0.77, P=0.59), while FOLH1-High was associated with numerically longer cabozantinib time-on-treatment (223 vs. 61 days, HR 0.60, P=0.08). Conclusions: We observed differential patterns of FOLH1 expression by histology and tumor site. FOLH1 expression was strongly correlated with angiogenic gene expression and distinct differences in TME composition, including endothelial cell abundance . FOLH1 gene expression was positively correlated with increased duration of anti-angiogenic treatment. Additional studies are needed to test the efficacy of PSMA-based diagnostics/therapeutics in RCC.

Phase I/II study of ipilimumab plus nivolumab combined with sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma

521

Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 27% and median overall survival (OS) of 10.5 months (Mo) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients (pts) progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy and PD1/L1 inhibitor, which led to accelerated US FDA approval in this setting. The combination of SG and pembrolizumab is safe and active following platinum-based chemotherapy. Nivolumab (NIVO) 1mg/kg plus Ipilimumab (IPI) 3mg/kg has shown promising activity in post-platinum mUC pts. Given the potential synergism between immunogenic cell death induced by SG and IPI-NIVO, we hypothesized that the combination of SG and IPI-NIVO would be safe and active as a frontline treatment for cisplatin ineligible mUC. Methods: 3+ 3 design was used for the phase I dose escalation of SG at 8 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg dose levels. IPI and NIVO were given at 3mg/kg and1mg/kg (I3+N1) intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks x 4 cycles followed by NIVO 360 mg IV day 1 every 3 weeks. SG was given IV at days 1,8 every 3 weeks The primary endpoint was safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on dose limiting toxicity (DLTs) observed in cycle 1; key secondary endpoints include ORR, DOR, PFS and OS. Key inclusion criteria were ECOG-PS 0-1, cisplatin-ineligibility, treatment naïve, no prior PD1/L1 inhibitor except >3 months earlier for non-metastatic disease. Results: The study has completed the phase I dose escalation after enrolling a total of 9 patients (8 men, 1-woman, median age: 74 years). 6 patients were enrolled at SG 8 mg/kg with 1 DLT, and 3 patients at 10 mg/kg with 2 DLTs. DLTs included grade 3 skin rash (n=2) and grade 3 pneumonitis (n=1). The RP2D of SG was determined to be 8 mg/kg with I3+N1. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAE) included anemia (66.6%) neutropenia (66.6%), pruritus (66.6%), fatigue (66.6%), diarrhea (66.6%) and lymphopenia (55.5%). 2 patients developed grade 2 infusion reactions to SG. Other grade ≥ 3 TRAE included neutropenia (55.5%), anemia (33.3%), arthralgia (11.1%), and elevated amylase/lipase (11.1%). Both grade 2 pneumonitis and myositis were seen in 1 patient. Of the 9 pts, 6 pts (4 pts at SG dose of 8mg/kg and 2 pts at 10 mg/kg) were considered evaluable for response of whom 4 responded (ORR 66.6%) with 1 complete response and 3 partial responses. Median DOR was 9.2 Mo (range 4.6-12.0); mPFS was 8.8 Mo (95% CI 3.8-NR) and mOS was not reached. Conclusions: The RP2D of SG was identified as 8mg/kg in combination with Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg+ Nivolumab 1 mg/kg as first-line therapy for cisplatin-ineligible mUC. Early signals of promising activity were observed in a small cohort of evaluable pts. The Phase 2 trial is ongoing coupled with exploratory biomarker analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT04863885 .

Multi-center, retrospective study of first-line systemic therapy ± immune checkpoint inhibition for metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract

467

Background: Neuroendocrine, small cell, or large cell carcinoma originating from the urothelium (uro-NE/SCC/LCC) is rare. Outcomes for metastatic disease are dismal. Treatment is extrapolated from small cell lung cancer, for which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have modest activity. Preliminary activity has been reported with ICI for uro-NE. We aimed to compare real-world progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between ICI-containing and non-ICI-containing regimens in the first line (1L) metastatic setting for uro-NE/SCC/LCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective study at 11 cancer centers. Patients (pts) who received systemic therapy (2011-2021) for biopsy confirmed metastatic uro-NE/SCC/LCC were included. Pts with metastasis within 6 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) (n=16) were excluded from 1L analyses. Results: 102 pts with metastatic uro-NE/SCC/LCC were evaluable. 17 (16.7%) had NE histology, 81 (79.4%) SCC, and 4 (3.9%) LCC. NE/SCC/LCC was mixed with urothelial histology in 19 (18.6%). Primary tumors were most often in the bladder (84.3%, n=86), less frequently upper tract (11.8%, n=12) or urethra (3.9%, n=4). 42 pts (41.2%) were previously treated for localized disease, the rest were de novo metastatic (n=60, 58.8%). Pts who received an ICI in any line (n=61) had significantly longer OS (p=0.038) than pts that never received an ICI (n=41). As shown in the table, in the 1L, ICI-containing regimens (n=33) resulted in significantly longer PFS, but not OS or ORR compared to non-ICI regimens (n=53). Subdividing 1L regimens into ICI without CT (n=14), CT without ICI (n=53), or ICI + CT (n=19), both PFS and OS were significantly different with similar ORR. ICI w/o CT had the longest median PFS and OS with an ORR 57.1% comparable to CT regimens. Of 61 pts that received ICI in any line, 14 (23.0%) had an immune-related adverse event of any grade; 11 (18.0%) received steroids. Conclusions: This is the largest ever report of ICI for metastatic uro-NE/SCC/LCC. ICIs were associated with improved outcomes with expected added toxicity. Further prospective investigation of ICI regimens is warranted. [Table: see text]

Clinical outcomes of patients with bone-predominant metastatic renal cell carcinoma

703

Background: Bone-predominant metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is associated with aggressive biology and poor prognosis. The optimal management of these patients (pts) remains not well-established. While contemporary trials showed the superiority of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared to vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), these pts were often excluded due to non-measurable disease. mRCC bone metastases show an enhanced angiogenesis gene signature suggesting the potential for greater responses to TKI. We test this hypothesis in a retrospective study comparing treatment outcomes for the first line (1L) TKI versus ICI in pts with bone-predominant mRCC. Methods: Pts with mRCC who received care at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center from 1/1/2008 to 6/1/2021 were identified through retrospective chart review. Bone-predominant metastasis was defined as the number of bone metastases > extra-osseous metastases. Pts who had ≥1 cycle of treatment and follow-up scans were evaluated for treatment responses per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparisons were made between TKI and ICI cohorts, and the significance was determined by logrank test. Pt who received ICI-TKI in 1L were excluded from the survival analysis due to limited N. Results: A total of 335 pts with mRCC were identified, of which 45 (13.4%) had bone-predominant metastasis. Most of the pts (44/45) had clear cell histology. TKI was the 1L intervention for 21 (47%) while 20 (44%) pts received ICI, and 4 (9%) pts received TKI-ICI. TKI and ICI cohorts were similar for International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) Risk (Table). In the TKI cohort, 19 pts had evaluable responses with ORR of 15.7% and SD of 42%. The mPFS was 5.9 months (95% CI 2.8–9), and mOS was 30.4 months (95% CI 3.3–57.6). In the ICI cohort, 16 had evaluable responses with ORR of 6% and SD of 43.8%. The mPFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 0–8.2), and mOS was 19.3 months (95% CI 14.9–23.7). The hazard ratio was 0.58 for PFS and 0.54 for OS, favoring TKI over ICI, although statistical significance was not reached due to the small sample size (p=0.10 and 0.12, respectively). Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective study, pts with bone-predominant mRCC who received TKI compared to ICI as 1L therapy showed improved ORR, PFS, and OS. These results warrant further investigation in larger studies comparing TKI-containing regimen vs ICI doublet. [Table: see text]

Impact of systemic therapy (ST) on deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) perioperative outcomes: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis

650

Background: Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is highly individualized and often involves cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and systemic therapy (ST). The optimal sequencing of CN and ST is uncertain. A difference in perioperative outcomes based on sequence of CN and ST could influence decision-making. We conducted this NSQIP analysis to assess whether preoperative systemic therapy adversely impacted perioperative outcomes in patients receiving deferred CN. Methods: This analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Participant Use Data File for years 2019 and 2020. These years were selected because data on receipt of preoperative therapy is only available since 2019. Inclusion criteria were i) CPT code consistent with nephrectomy, ii) urologist operating surgeon & iii) presence of disseminated cancer. All cases with ICD-10 diagnosis codes not consistent with mRCC were excluded. Groups were stratified by their receipt of preoperative systemic therapy within 90 days before CN and we assessed 46 preoperative and perioperative outcomes. Results: The study cohort included 505 patients with 115 (23%) who received preoperative ST. No differences were noted in perioperative outcomes (Table). Patients receiving preoperative ST were more likely to be on steroids (23% vs. 7%, p<0.01) and develop urinary tract infections (4.3% vs. 0.5%, p<0.01). There were no significant differences noted in other related variables like surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, sepsis, septic shock, pneumonia, cardiovascular complications, preoperative hypertension, or preoperative diabetes (p>0.05). Conclusions: Because preoperative ST did not have an appreciable impact on deferred CN perioperative outcomes, decision making for ST and CN sequencing should not be influenced by perioperative outcomes. Those who undergo deferred CN are unlikely to experience delayed time to surgery or perioperative complications from their ST. [Table: see text]

A multicenter study assessing survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with and without cytoreductive nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was called into question following the publication of the CARMENA trial. While previous retrospective studies have supported CN alongside targeted therapies, there is minimal research establishing its role in conjunction with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between CN and oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with immunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2000 and 2020 who were treated at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and The Ohio State University and who were treated with ICI systemic therapy (ST) at any point in their disease course. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier analyses. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations with mortality.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 367 patients (CN+ST n = 232, ST alone n = 135). Among patients undergoing CN, 30 were deferred. Median survivor follow-up was 28.4 months. ICI therapy was first-line in 28.1%, second-line in 17.4%, and third or subsequent line (3L+) in 54.5% of patients. Overall, patients who underwent CN+ST had longer median OS (56.3 months IQR 50.2-79.8) compared to the ST alone group (19.1 months IQR 12.8-23.8). Multivariable analyses demonstrated a 67% reduction in risk of all-cause mortality in patients who received CN+ST vs. ST alone (P < 0.0001). Similar results were noted when first-line ICI therapy recipients were examined as a subgroup. Upfront and deferred CN did not demonstrate significant differences in OS.

CONCLUSIONS

CN was independently associated with longer OS in patients with mRCC treated with ICI in any line of therapy. Our data support consideration of CN in well selected patients with mRCC undergoing treatment with ICI.

Biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant atezolizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

4584

Background: We previously reported the clinical outcomes of a positive multi-center phase II trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (C) plus atezolizumab (A) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Funt, et al. JCO 2022). In this and another trial of neoadjuvant GC with pembrolizumab (Rose et al, JCO 2021), PD-L1 positivity by immunohistochemistry was not predictive of non–muscle-invasive downstaging ( < pT2N0). Therefore, we investigated other pre-treatment tissue-based genomic and gene expression biomarkers of response and resistance. Methods: 36 pts had pre-treatment tissue available for genomic analysis. We performed targeted hybridization capture DNA sequencing using the CLIA-certified MSK-IMPACT platform and whole transcriptome RNA sequencing. We examined genomic and gene expression biomarkers which have been previously investigated in the context of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy or anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy for MIBC, including tumor mutation burden (TMB), a DNA damage response (DDR) 9-gene panel (NCT03609216) associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and an 8-gene cytotoxic T cell transcriptional signature associated with response to neoadjuvant A (tGE8; Powles et al, Nature Medicine 2019). We also evaluated TGF-β pathway activation, which was associated with resistance to A in pts with metastatic BC (Mariathasan et al, Nature 2018). Putative biomarkers were assessed for correlation with < pT2N0, the trial’s primary endpoint. Results: DNA was available from all 36 pts, and RNA met quality control metrics for 29 pts. TMB was significantly higher in pts with < pT2N0 (median 16 mut/Mb, IQR 12-25) versus ≥ pT2N0 (median 10 mut/ Mb, IQR 8-10; p < 0.01). A single patient had a TMB > 200 Mut/Mb with a POLE hotspot mutation and achieved pT0N0; TMB was still significantly higher in responders after omission of this patient (p < 0.01). Nine of 25 pts (36%) with < pT2N0 had a deleterious DDR mutation versus 1 of 10 pts (10%) with ≥ pT2N0 (p = 0.13). While tGE8 was significantly increased in patients with < pT2N0 compared to those without (p = 0.01), TGF-β pathway activation was not increased in pts with ≥ pT2N0 (p = 0.99). Conclusions: TMB and the tGE8 cytotoxic T cell transcriptional signature were associated with response to combination GC+A in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. More detailed molecular analyses will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT02989584.

Outcomes of second-line therapies in patients with metastatic de novo small cell prostate cancer (SCPC) and treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (tNEPC)

e17022

Background: De novo SCPC and tNEPC in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are rare, aggressive cancers with a poor prognosis. After first-line (1L) platinum chemotherapy (PLT), there is no consensus on 2L treatments. This multi-institutional, retrospective study examines practice patterns among clinicians and evaluates the outcomes of patients (pts) with SCPC or tNEPC in the 2L setting. Methods: After IRB approval, pts with a pathologic diagnosis of SCPC or tNEPC (any % of SC or NE histology defined by institutional review) were identified. Pts diagnosed between 2000-2020 who received 1L PLT and any 2L systemic therapy (tx) for SCPC or tNEPC were included. Standardized data collection templates containing demographic, clinical, and pathologic variables were collected. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) to 2L tx. Secondary endpoints included PSA response, time on 2L treatment, and overall survival (OS) from time of 2L tx. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Forty-two pts (21 SCPC, 21 tNEPC) from 6 institutions were included. At SCPC/tNEPC diagnosis, the overall cohort had a median age of 65.0 years (IQR 60.5, 68.0) and median PSA of 3.0 ng/dL (IQR 0.5, 21.8). The most common sites of metastasis included lymph node (78.6%), bone (54.8%), and liver (52.4%). For 1L tx, 37 pts (88.1%) received PLT and 5 (11.9%) had PLT + immunotherapy (IMM). For treatment to the prostate, 21 (51.2%) had none, 7 (17.1%) radiation (RT), 9 (22.0%) surgery, 3 (7.3%) RT + surgery, and 1 (2.4%) brachytherapy alone. Concurrent ADT was given to 32 pts (76.2%) in the 1L and 2L. At last follow-up, 34 pts (81.0%) were dead, 4 (9.5%) were alive, and 4 (9.5%) were lost to follow-up/censored. For 2L tx, 10 pts (23.8%) received PLT, 8 (19.0%) taxane monotherapy (TAX), 10 (23.8%) IMM, 8 (19.0%) other chemotherapy (CHX), and 6 (14.3%) other tx. Among 38 pts evaluable for response, the ORR was 15.8% (6 pts with PR: 4 PLT, 1 IMM, 1 CHX). PSA response ≥ 50% to 2L tx was seen in 5 of 29 pts with PSA data (17.2%). Other outcomes data are reported in Table. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, pts with SCPC or tNEPC who reached 2L tx received a wide variety of treatment regimens, reflecting the lack of consensus in this tx setting. ORR was low and overall prognosis was poor in the 2L regardless of tx choice. Pts on 2L immunotherapy seemed to have the shortest mOS. [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is standard for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). On the basis of the activity of atezolizumab (A) in metastatic BC, we tested neoadjuvant GC plus A for MIBC.

METHODS

Eligible patients with MIBC (cT2-T4aN0M0) received a dose of A, followed 2 weeks later by GC plus A every 21 days for four cycles followed 3 weeks later by a dose of A before RC. The primary end point was non-muscle-invasive downstaging to < pT2N0.

RESULTS

Of 44 enrolled patients, 39 were evaluable. The primary end point was met, with 27 of 39 patients (69%) < pT2N0, including 16 (41%) pT0N0. No patient with < pT2N0 relapsed and four (11%) with ≥ pT2N0 relapsed with a median follow-up of 16.5 months (range: 7.0-33.7 months). One patient refused RC and two developed metastatic disease before RC; all were considered nonresponders. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (n = 16; 36%). Grade 3 immune-related AEs occurred in five (11%) patients with two (5%) requiring systemic steroids. The median time from last dose of chemotherapy to surgery was 7.8 weeks (range: 5.1-17 weeks), and no patient failed to undergo RC because of AEs. Four of 39 (10%) patients had programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors and were all < pT2N0. Of the patients with PD-L1 low or negative tumors, 23 of 34 (68%) achieved < pT2N0 and 11 of 34 (32%) were ≥ pT2N0 (P = .3 for association between PD-L1 and < pT2N0).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant GC plus A is a promising regimen for MIBC and warrants further study. Patients with < pT2N0 experienced improved relapse-free survival. The PD-L1 positivity rate was low compared with published data, which limits conclusions regarding PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker.

Cabozantinib plus Nivolumab Phase I Expansion Study in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Refractory to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

PURPOSE

This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) that progressed on checkpoint inhibition (CPI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A phase I expansion cohort of patients with mUC who received prior CPI was treated with cabozantinib 40 mg/day and nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary goal was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v.1.1. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine out of 30 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Median follow-up was 22.2 months. Most patients (86.7%) received prior chemotherapy and all patients received prior CPI (median seven cycles). ORR was 16.0%, with one complete response and three partial responses (PR). Among 4 responders, 2 were primary refractory, 1 had a PR, and 1 had stable disease on prior CPI. Median DoR was 33.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.7-33.5], median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.1-5.5), and median OS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 5.8-19.5). CaboNivo decreased immunosuppressive subsets such as regulatory T cells (Tregs) and increased potential antitumor immune subsets such as nonclassical monocytes and effector T cells. A lower percentage of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSC) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs, lower CTLA-4 and TIM-3 expression on Tregs, and higher effector CD4+ T cells at baseline were associated with better PFS and/or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

CaboNivo was clinically active, well tolerated, and favorably modulated peripheral blood immune subsets in patients with mUC refractory to CPI.

The association of FDG PET/CT and NaF PET/CT with survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic genitourinary malignancies (mGU) treated with cabozantinib + nivolumab +/- ipilimumab (CaboNivo +/- Ipi)

452

Background: This study determined the association of functional imaging parameters obtained on FDG PET/CT and NaF PET/CT with OS for pts with mGU malignancies treated on a phase I study with CaboNivo +/- Ipi. Methods: Pts on this phase I study underwent sequential (1-hour apart) FDG PET/CT and NaF PET/CT imaging at baseline and at first-restaging (8 weeks follow up). Scan semi-quantitative parameters measures included: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) for FDG and MTV for NaF. Total lesion number was captured for all scans. The association of imaging parameters and survival was determined with Kaplan-Meier curves. Baseline values and percent change values were calculated. Results: 81 pts were included in the analysis. 67 (83%) were males; Median age was 63 (range 25-86); Histologically, 30 pts had urothelial carcinoma, 15 clear cell renal cell carcinoma, 9 germ cell tumors, 8 urachal/adenocarcinoma, 8 prostate cancer, 3 penile cancer, 3 squamous cell carcinoma, 3 renal medullary carcinoma, and 2 small cell (1 bladder, 1 prostate). All 81 had a baseline FDG PET scan, 78 pts received baseline NaF PET scans; 66 received both FDG PET and NaF PET baseline and follow up scans. 957 total lesions were detected on FDG PET across all histologies, 87 liver (9%), 252 lung (26%), 152 bone (16%), 411 lymph node (43%), and 55 other visceral metastases (6%). 414 total lesions were detected on NaF imaging. Low vs high baseline FDG MTV (31 vs 11 months, p = 0.0002), TLG (30 vs 11 months, p = 0.0004), Lesion number (49 vs 15 months, p = 0.0005), and SUVmax (25 vs 12 months, p = 0.025), FDG lesion number decrease or no change vs increase (24 vs 12 months, p = 0.0068), and low vs high baseline NaF MTV (26 vs 16 months, p = 0.007), and lesion number (26 vs 16 months, p = 0.007) showed the strongest associations with OS. A multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that baseline FDG MTV (HR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.62-5.08, p = 0.0003) and FDG lesion number percent change (HR = 2.71, 95% CI 1.40-5.24, p = 0.0031) were jointly associated with OS. Conclusions: Baseline functional imaging parameters and percent change seen on follow imaging with FDG PET and NaF PET are prognostic in mGU pts treated with CaboNivo +/- ipi. Additional parameters and histologic subsets will be presented.

Initial results of a phase II study of nivolumab(N) and ipilimumab(I) in genitourinary malignancies with neuroendocrine differentiation

569

Background: Patients with metastatic genitourinary malignancies with neuroendocrine have limited therapeutic options following platinum therapy. Given encouraging results in initial cohort analysis for small cell urinary tract carcinoma, a cohort of any genitourinary malignancy with neuroendocrine differentiation was added to a multicenter, single arm, multi-cohort phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of N and I in this setting. (NCT 03333616) Methods: Eligible patients had metastatic or locally advanced genitourinary malignancy with neuroendocrine differentiation with an ECOG performance status of 0-2; they may have received any line of prior therapy excluding prior immunotherapy. Patients underwent baseline biopsy and received treatment with N 3 mg/kg and I 1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles with continued maintenance of N 480 mg IV every 4 weeks. Imaging was performed at 12 weeks and then every 8 weeks through month 6 and then every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled between 06/27/2018 and 06/21/2021, 10 (37%) had urinary tract cancer and 17 (63%) had prostate cancer (19 in expansion cohort, 3 urinary tract and 5 prostate cancer from earlier cohorts). The majority (n=25, 93%) patients received prior systemic therapy. Nine (33%) patients received all 4 doses of N and I during the induction period. Nine (33%) patients (7 of whom received 4 cycles N+I) received N maintenance (median number of cycles 9 (range, 2-37)). Median follow-up was 6.8 (range, 0.9-37.3) months. Objective response was achieved in 8 (30%, 80% CI 18%-44%) patients (Table). Median duration of response was not reached with 4 patients maintaining response >9 months. Median progression-free survival time was 2.6 (95% CI 1.8-6.5) months At time of analysis, 13 (48%) death events were reported due to progressive disease, in which 3 were bladder and 10 were prostate cancer. 8 (30%) patients developed treatment-related grade 3 or higher toxicities; one grade 5 toxicity was deemed treatment-unrelated. Conclusions: In this study we demonstrate N+I resulted in objective responses in patients with genitourinary malignancy with neuroendocrine differentiation. ORR of 50% in small cell carcinoma is bladder cancer is noteworthy and will be evaluated further in ongoing expansion cohort of bladder or upper tract carcinoma with variant histology. Clinical trial information: NCT03333616. [Table: see text]

Abstract P3-09-09: Serial circulating tumor DNA from patients with metastatic breast cancer with and without BRCA1/2 mutations

Background: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) over time allows non-invasive evaluation of tumor genomic evolution. We characterize changes in tumor fraction (TFx), somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), and somatic mutations over time in patients (pts) with and without BRCA1/2 mutations and metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who received a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) or platinum chemotherapy. Specifically, we seek to identify the frequency of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations. Methods: Pts with mBC and germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were identified on a banking protocol of prospectively-collected serial samples of blood and plasma. Control pts without a BRCA1/2 mutation were matched 2:1 by age and hormone receptor (HR) status. Ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing (ULPWGS) with 0.1x depth was performed on all plasma samples (n=103) and the ichorCNA algorithm was used to determine TFx and SCNAs. Targeted panel sequencing (TPS) of 402 cancer-related genes was performed at 10,000x depth on plasma samples, and one blood sample per pt. The panel includes BRCA1/2 and 38 other DNA damage repair (DDR) genes. Somatic mutations were identified by joint calling with Mutect2 across plasma timepoints with paired pt normal blood. Germline variant calling from TPS on blood with HaplotypeCaller was used to confirm germline mutations in BRCA1/2. Results: We identified 10 pts with mBC with a germline (n=7) or somatic (n=3) BRCA1 (n=2) or BRCA2 (n=8) mutation and banked blood and plasma samples at 2-9 timepoints at a median of 8 weeks apart (range 1-43). The control cohort of 20 pts with mBC and wildtype BRCA1/2 was well matched by age and HR status. All pts with BRCA1/2 mutations received a PARPi and/or platinum chemotherapy at some point during sample collection. Half of control pts received platinum chemotherapy. Germline BRCA1/2 mutations were confirmed in all 7 pts with known germline mutations. Somatic BRCA2 mutations were confirmed in ctDNA in 2 of 3 patients. Among all samples, median TFx was 0.05 (range 0-0.80) with 35% of samples having TFx &gt;0.10. There was no significant difference in TFx by age, receptor status, or active treatment with a PARPi or platinum. There was no significant change in the percent of genome with a SCNA over time. A reversion mutation of a germline BRCA2 mutation, restoring the open reading frame of BRCA2, was discovered at the last timepoint from 1 pt while receiving carboplatin. She had radiographic progression 4 weeks later. A germline BRCA1/2 reversion mutation in this cohort occurred in 2.3% of samples, 14.3% of pts. The somatic mutation landscape and clonal evolution of TPS using PyClone will be presented. Clonal evolution can show emerging and responding clusters of variants. For pts with available tissue specimens, somatic variants in ctDNA will be compared to somatic mutations detected in tissue with TPS. Conclusions: Evaluation of serial ctDNA samples for TFx, SCNAs, and somatic mutations from banked plasma and blood from pts with mBC is feasible. SCNAs were stable over time. The frequency of reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 was low, suggesting that either their incidence is low or ctDNA TPS is not sensitive enough to detect them.

Citation Format: Katharine A Collier, David Tallman, Zachary T. Weber, Marcy Haynam, Elizabeth J. Adams, Janet Jenison, Sarah Asad, Maryam Lustberg, Mathew Cherian, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Sagar Sardesai, Nicole Williams, Robert Wesolowski, Jeffrey Vandeusen, Margaret E. Gatti-Mays, Ashley Pariser, Amir Mortazavi, Daniel G. Stover. Serial circulating tumor DNA from patients with metastatic breast cancer with and without BRCA1/2 mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-09.

Management of adverse events associated with cabozantinib plus nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma: A review

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been successfully developed in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), further advancing treatment. While safety profiles are generally manageable with combination regimens, overlapping adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs can make treatment more complex. The CheckMate 9ER study evaluated the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in combination with the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody nivolumab in patients with previously untreated advanced RCC. Cabozantinib + nivolumab demonstrated superiority over sunitinib for progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. These outcomes supported the approval of cabozantinib + nivolumab as a first-line therapy for advanced RCC. The safety profile was manageable with prophylaxis, supportive care, dose holds and reductions for cabozantinib, and dose holds and immunosuppressive therapy for nivolumab. This review discusses the safety results of CheckMate 9ER and provides guidance on managing some of the more clinically relevant AEs with a focus on overlapping AEs, including diarrhea, elevated amylase/lipase, hepatotoxicity, dermatologic reactions, fatigue, endocrine disorders, and nephrotoxicity. We discuss AE management strategies (prophylaxis, supportive care, dose modification, and immunosuppressive therapy), and provide recommendations for identifying the causative agent of overlapping AEs and for consulting specialists about organ-specific immune-related AEs. Optimizing AE management can maintain tolerability and should be a priority with cabozantinib + nivolumab treatment.

Kidney Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC typically undergo surgery and/or receive systemic therapy. Tumor histology and risk stratification of patients is important in therapy selection. The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer stratify treatment recommendations by histology; recommendations for first-line treatment of ccRCC are also stratified by risk group. To further guide management of advanced RCC, the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel has categorized all systemic kidney cancer therapy regimens as "Preferred," "Other Recommended Regimens," or "Useful in Certain Circumstances." This categorization provides guidance on treatment selection by considering the efficacy, safety, evidence, and other factors that play a role in treatment selection. These factors include pre-existing comorbidities, nature of the disease, and in some cases consideration of access to agents. This article summarizes surgical and systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC.

Clinical Activity and Safety of Cabozantinib for Brain Metastases in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma

Importance

Patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been underrepresented in clinical trials, and effective systemic therapy is lacking. Cabozantinib shows robust clinical activity in metastatic RCC, but its effect on brain metastases remains unclear.

Objective

To assess the clinical activity and toxic effects of cabozantinib to treat brain metastases in patients with metastatic RCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic RCC and brain metastases treated in 15 international institutions (US, Belgium, France, and Spain) between January 2014 and October 2020. Cohort A comprised patients with progressing brain metastases without concomitant brain-directed local therapy, and cohort B comprised patients with stable or progressing brain metastases concomitantly treated by brain-directed local therapy.

Exposures

Receipt of cabozantinib monotherapy at any line of treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Intracranial radiological response rate by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and toxic effects of cabozantinib.

Results

Of the 88 patients with brain metastases from RCC included in the study, 33 (38%) were in cohort A and 55 (62%) were in cohort B; the majority of patients were men (n = 69; 78%), and the median age at cabozantinib initiation was 61 years (range, 34-81 years). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 2-74 months). The intracranial response rate was 55% (95% CI, 36%-73%) and 47% (95% CI, 33%-61%) in cohorts A and B, respectively. In cohort A, the extracranial response rate was 48% (95% CI, 31%-66%), median time to treatment failure was 8.9 months (95% CI, 5.9-12.3 months), and median overall survival was 15 months (95% CI, 9.0-30.0 months). In cohort B, the extracranial response rate was 38% (95% CI, 25%-52%), time to treatment failure was 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-13.2 months), and median overall survival was 16 months (95% CI, 12.0-21.9 months). Cabozantinib was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxic effects or neurological adverse events reported. No treatment-related deaths were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, cabozantinib showed considerable intracranial activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with RCC and brain metastases. Support of prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of cabozantinib for brain metastases in patients with RCC is critical.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis from First-in-Human Data for HDAC Inhibitor, REC-2282 (AR-42), in Patients with Solid Tumors and Hematologic Malignancies: A Case Study for Evaluating Flat vs. Body Size Normalized Dosing

Background and Objectives

REC-2282 is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo models of malignancy.  The aims of this study were to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of REC-2282 (AR-42) from the first-in-human (NCT01129193) and phase I acute myeloid leukemia trials (NCT01798901) and to evaluate potential sources of variability. Additionally, we sought to understand alternate body size descriptors as sources of inter-individual variability (IIV), which was significant for dose-normalized maximum observed concentration and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC).

Methods

Datasets from two clinical trials were combined, and population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM and R softwares; patient demographics were tested as covariates.

Results

A successful population pharmacokinetic model was constructed. The pharmacokinetics of REC-2282 were best described by a two-compartment model with one transit compartment for absorption, first-order elimination and a proportional error model. Fat-free mass (FFM) was retained as a single covariate on clearance (CL), though it explained < 3% of the observed variability on CL. Tumor type and formulation were retained as covariates on lag time, and a majority of variability, attributed to absorption, remained unexplained. Computed tomography (CT)-derived lean body weight estimates were lower than estimated lean body weight and fat-free mass measures in most patients. Analysis of dose-normalized AUC vs. body size descriptors suggests flat dosing is most appropriate for REC-2282.

Conclusions

FFM was identified as a significant covariate on CL; however, it explained only a very small portion of the IIV; major factors contributing significantly to REC-2282 pharmacokinetic variability remain unidentified.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13318-021-00722-z.

Effect of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine With or Without Berzosertib in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Preclinical studies suggest that inhibition of single-stranded DNA repair by ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 (ATR) may enhance the cytotoxicity of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and other chemotherapeutic agents. Cisplatin with gemcitabine remains the standard up-front therapy for treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of the selective ATR inhibitor, berzosertib, could augment the activity of cisplatin with gemcitabine.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, 87 patients across 23 centers in the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network were randomized to receive either cisplatin with gemcitabine alone (control arm) or cisplatin with gemcitabine plus berzosertib (experimental arm). Key eligibility criteria included confirmed metastatic urothelial cancer, no prior cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease, 12 months or more since perioperative therapy, and eligibility for cisplatin receipt based on standard criteria. The study was conducted from January 27, 2017, to December 15, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

In the control arm, cisplatin, 70 mg/m2, was given on day 1 and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In the experimental arm, cisplatin, 60 mg/m2, was given on day 1; gemcitabine, 875 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8; and berzosertib, 90 mg/m2, on days 2 and 9 of a 21-day cycle.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival. The analysis was on all patients who started therapy.

RESULTS

Of the total of 87 patients randomized, 41 patients received cisplatin with gemcitabine alone and 46 received cisplatin with gemcitabine plus berzosertib. Median age was 67 (range, 32-84) years, and 68 patients (78%) were men. Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months for both arms (Bajorin risk-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.72-2.08). Median overall survival was shorter with cisplatin with gemcitabine plus berzosertib compared with cisplatin with gemcitabine alone (14.4 vs 19.8 months; Bajorin risk-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.76-2.68). Higher rates of grade 3 vs grade 4 thrombocytopenia (59% vs 39%) and neutropenia (37% vs 27%) were observed with cisplatin with gemcitabine and berzosertib compared with cisplatin with gemcitabine alone; consequently, more dose reductions were needed in the experimental arm. Patients in the experimental arm received a median cisplatin dose of 250 mg/m2, which was significantly lower than the median dose of 370 mg/m2 in the control arm (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The addition of berzosertib to cisplatin with gemcitabine did not prolong progression-free survival relative to cisplatin with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer, and a trend toward inferior survival was observed with this combination. Berzosertib plus cisplatin with gemcitabine was associated with significantly higher hematologic toxicities despite attenuated dosing of cisplatin with gemcitabine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02567409.

Early phase clinical studies of AR-42, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, for neurofibromatosis type 2-associated vestibular schwannomas and meningiomas

OBJECTIVES

Two pilot studies of AR-42, a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in human neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), vestibular schwannomas (VS), and meningiomas are presented. Primary endpoints included safety, and intra-tumoral pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD).

METHODS

Pilot 1 is a subset analysis of a phase 1 study of AR-42 in solid tumors, which included NF2 or sporadic meningiomas. Tumor volumes and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) are reported (NCT01129193).Pilot 2 is a phase 0 surgical study of AR-42 assessing intra-tumoral PK and PD. AR-42 was administered for 3 weeks pre-operatively. Plasma and tumor drug concentrations and p-AKT expression were measured (NCT02282917).

RESULTS

Pilot 1: Five patients with NF2 and two with sporadic meningiomas experienced a similar incidence of TRAEs to the overall phase I trial. The six evaluable patients had 15 tumors (8 VS, 7 meningiomas). On AR-42, tumor volume increased in six, remained stable in eight, and decreased in one tumor. The annual percent growth rate decreased in eight, remained stable in three, and increased in four tumors. Pilot 2: Four patients with sporadic VS and one patient with meningioma experienced no grade 3/4 toxicities. Expression of p-AKT decreased in three of four VS. All tumors had higher AR-42 concentrations than plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

AR-42 is safe. Tumor volumes showed a mixed response, but most slowed growth. On a 40-mg regimen, drug concentrated in tumors and growth pathways were suppressed in most tumors, suggesting this may be a well-tolerated and effective dose. A phase 2 study of AR-42 for NF2-associated tumors appears warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1b, 4.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced urological cancers with pre-existing autoimmune disorders: a retrospective international multicenter study

BACKGROUND

There is limited experience regarding the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in patients with autoimmune disorders (AD) and advanced urological cancers as they are generally excluded from clinical trials due to risk of exacerbations.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) and urothelial cancer (UC) with pre-existing AD treated with CPI catalogued the incidence of AD exacerbations, new immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and clinical outcomes. Competing risk models estimated cumulative incidences of exacerbations and new irAEs at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients with AD (58 RCC, 48 UC) from 10 centers, 35 (33%) had grade 1/2 clinically active AD of whom 10 (9%) required corticosteroids or immunomodulators at baseline. Exacerbations of pre-existing AD occurred in 38 (36%) patients with 17 (45%) requiring corticosteroids and 6 (16%) discontinuing CPI. New onset irAEs occurred in 40 (38%) patients with 22 (55%) requiring corticosteroids and 8 (20%) discontinuing CPI. Grade 3/4 events occurred in 6 (16%) of exacerbations and 13 (33%) of new irAEs. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Median follow-up was 15 months. For RCC, objective response rate (ORR) was 31% (95% CI 20% to 45%), median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7 months (95% CI 4 to 10) and 12-month overall survival (OS) was 78% (95% CI 63% to 87%). For UC, ORR was 40% (95% CI 26% to 55%), median TTF was 5.0 months (95% CI 2.3 to 9.0) and 12-month OS was 63% (95% CI 47% to 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RCC and UC with well-controlled AD can benefit from CPI with manageable toxicities that are consistent with what is expected of a non-AD population. Prospective study is warranted to comprehensively evaluate the benefits and safety of CPI in patients with AD.

Salvage immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

e16567

Background: ICI/TKI combinations are a new standard of care for the initial treatment (tx) of mRCC. Efficacy and toxicity of such combination regimens beyond the first-line (1L) setting remain unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts for adult patients (pts) receiving an ICI/TKI combination in any line of tx for mRCC of any histology at one of two academic centers as of May 1, 2020. ICIs included pembrolizumab (Pm), nivolumab (Ni), ipilimumab (Ip), or avelumab (Av); TKIs included sunitinib (Su), axitinib (Ax), pazopanib (Pz), lenvatinib (Ln), or cabozantinib (Ca). Clinical data including pt demographics, histology, International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group, tx history, and ICI/TKI tx and toxicity details were recorded. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and safety, analyzed via descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 85 pts, 69 (81%) were male and 67 (79%) had clear cell histology. IMDC risk was favorable (24%), intermediate (54%), poor (20%), and unknown (2%). 39% had ICI/TKI tx in the 1L setting. ICI/TKI regimens included Pm/Ax (33%), Ni/Ca (25%), Ni/Ax (20%), Av/Ax (11%), Ni/Ip/Ca (8%), Ni/Su (2%), and Ni/Ln (1%). ORR and mPFS stratified by line of tx and prior tx are shown in the table. Of 52 pts who received ICI/TKI tx as salvage (after 1L), 52% had a grade 3 or higher (≥G3) adverse event (AE), of which the most common were anorexia (13.5%), diarrhea and hypertension (11.5% each), and fatigue (9.6%). 65% of pts on salvage ICI/TKI tx stopped tx for progression/death, while 16% stopped tx for ≥G3 AE. ≥G3 AE rates by line of tx were 62.5% (2L), 50% (3L), and 45% (≥4L). Conclusions: ICI/TKI combination therapy is effective and safe beyond the 1L setting. Prior tx history appears to impact efficacy but has less of an effect on safety/tolerability. These observations will need to be confirmed in prospective studies.[Table: see text]

Serial circulating tumor DNA samples from patients with metastatic breast cancer and BRCA1/2 mutations

1025

Background: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) over time allows non-invasive evaluation of tumor genomic evolution. We characterize changes in tumor fraction (TFx), somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), and somatic mutations (muts) over time in patients (pts) with BRCA1/2 muts and metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who received a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) or platinum chemotherapy. Specifically, we seek to identify the frequency of BRCA1/2 reversion muts. Methods: Pts with mBC and germline or somatic BRCA1/2 muts were identified on a banking protocol of prospectively-collected serial samples of blood and plasma. Control pts without a BRCA1/2 mut were matched 2:1 by age and hormone receptor (HR) status. Ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing (ULPWGS) with 0.1x depth was performed on all plasma samples (n = 103) and the ichorCNA algorithm was used to determine TFx and SCNAs. Targeted panel sequencing (TPS) of 402 cancer-related genes was performed at 10,000x depth on plasma samples, and one blood sample per pt. The panel includes BRCA1/2 and 38 other DNA damage repair (DDR) genes. Somatic muts were identified by joint calling with Mutect2 across plasma timepoints with paired pt normal blood. Germline variant calling from TPS on blood with HaplotypeCaller was used to confirm germline muts in BRCA1/2.Results: We identified 10 pts with mBC with a germline (n = 7) or somatic (n = 3) BRCA1 (n = 2) or BRCA2 (n = 8) mut and banked blood and plasma samples at 3-9 timepoints at a median of 8 weeks apart (range 1-43). The control cohort of 20 pts with mBC and wildtype BRCA1/2 was well matched by age and HR status. All pts with BRCA1/2 muts received a PARPi and/or platinum chemotherapy at some point during sample collection. Half of control pts received platinum chemotherapy. Germline BRCA1/2 muts were confirmed in all 7 pts with known germline muts. Among the BRCA1/2 mut cohort, median TFx was 0.04 (range 0-0.57) with 20% of samples having TFx > 0.10. A median of 1.5 (range 0-39) somatic muts per pt were found in DDR genes. Four pts (40%) had secondary non-reversion muts in BRCA1/2. A reversion mut of a germline BRCA2 mut, restoring the open reading frame of BRCA2, was discovered at the last timepoint from 1 pt while receiving carboplatin. A germline BRCA1/2 reversion mut in this cohort occurred in 2.3% of samples, 14.3% of pts. There was no significant difference in the percent of genome with a SCNA between the first and last time point, nor before and after PARPi/platinum. The somatic mut landscape and clonal evolution of TPS using PyClone will be presented. Conclusions: Evaluation of serial ctDNA samples for TFx, SCNAs, and somatic muts from banked plasma and blood from pts with mBC is feasible. The frequency of reversion muts in BRCA1/2 was low, suggesting that either their incidence is low or ctDNA TPS is not sensitive enough to detect them. Secondary non-reversion muts in BRCA1/2 and other somatic DDR muts were more common. SCNAs were stable over time.

Neoadjuvant atezolizumab (A) with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial

4517

Background: Neoadjuvant GC is standard for pts with MIBC and can result in pathologic downstaging to non-MIBC ( < pT2N0) at radical cystectomy (RC), which correlates with improved survival. Based on the known activity of A in metastatic BC (mBC), we tested the combination of GC+A as neoadjuvant therapy for MIBC in a phase II trial (NCT02989584). Methods: Eligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4aN0M0) received a single dose of A (1200 mg IV) and, two weeks later, began C (as either 70mg/m2 IV on D1 or 35 mg/m2 on D1,D8), G (1000 mg/m2 on D1,D8), and A (1200 mg IV on D8) every 21 days for 4 cycles followed by RC. Pts were also able to receive one additional dose of A 3 weeks after the last dose of A and prior to RC. The primary endpoint was proportion of pts with < pT2N0. Pts were considered not evaluable for the primary endpoint if they received less than 2 cycles due to withdrawal of consent or unrelated adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included the proportion of pts with pT0N0, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and safety. We prespecified null and alternate < pT2N0 rates of 35% and 55%, respectively, with the null being rejected if at least 19 of 39 pts achieved < pT2N0. Pretreatment tumors underwent centralized PD-L1 staining (SP142; positive if ≥5% of immune cells). Results: Between Feb 2018 and May 2020, 44 pts were enrolled from five institutions. Five pts were not evaluable (withdrawal of consent before C3, n = 4; unrelated AEs during C1, n = 1). Of the 39 evaluable pts (cT2N0 79%, cT3N0 18%, cT4N0 3%), 1 pt refused surgery and was considered a non-responder. The primary endpoint was met, with 27 of 39 pts (69%) < pT2N0 at RC, including 15 (38%) pT0N0. All pts achieving < pT2N0 are alive and disease free. The median RFS was not reached with a median follow-up of 16.7 months (range: 7.7-33.2). The median time from last dose of chemotherapy to RC was 7.8 weeks (range 5.1 – 17). The most common grade 3-4 treatment related AEs were due to chemotherapy and were neutropenia (36%), lymphopenia (16%), and anemia (11%). Possible grade 3-4 immune related AEs included 2 pts with asymptomatic grade 3 pancreatic enzyme elevation, 1 pt with grade 3 pancreatitis, and 1 pt with hepatitis requiring steroids. Only 4 of 39 (10%) pts had PD-L1 positive tumors, which is low compared to mBC (25% positive; Powles et al. Lancet 2017) and MIBC (40% positive; Powles et al. Nature Med 2019) cohorts also tested with the SP142 clone. All 4 pts with PD-L1 positive tumors achieved < pT2N0. Twelve of 12 (100%) non-responding pts were PD-L1 negative and 23 of 27 (85%) responding pts were PD-L1 negative (p = 0.3). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant GC+A is an effective and safe regimen for the treatment of pts with MIBC. The PD-L1 positivity rate was low compared with other studies and was not predictive of pathologic downstaging. Additional interrogation of the genomic and host immune factors mediating response and resistance to GC+A is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02989584.

Treatment outcomes in renal cell carcinoma patients with metastases to the pancreas and other sites

4557

Background: Metastatic RCC (mRCC) involving the pancreas is distinct from RCC involving other metastatic sites and is characterized by an indolent clinical course, heightened angiogenesis, and an inflamed stroma (PMID: 32271170). We previously reported on outcomes of RCC patients (pts) with pancreatic oligometastasis (ASCO GU 2020). We now report on outcomes in pts with mRCC involving the pancreas in conjunction with other metastases (mets). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional study of mRCC pts with mets to the pancreas and other sites. Data on pt demographics, tumor characteristics, systemic therapy, and outcomes were collected. Pts were classified based on treatment category: immunotherapy (IO) or vascular endothelial growth factor/receptor inhibitors (VEGFI). Outcomes measured included objective response rates (ORR), time-on-treatment (TOT), and overall survival (OS). Results: The analysis included 229 pts from 9 institutions, diagnosed between 1985-2020. Of these, 211 (92%) had clear-cell histology; 131 (57%) had nephrectomy; 41 (18%) had local pancreas-directed therapy; 111 (48%) had synchronous presentation of disease in the pancreas and other sites at time of mets. IMDC risk was favorable in 33%, intermediate in 41%, poor in 11%, and unknown in 15% pts. Median lines of therapy was 2 (range 0-9). Of 219 pts who received first-line (1L) therapy, 151 (69%) had VEGFI therapy, 41 (19%) had IO, and 18 (8%) had VEGFI/IO combination (Table). The IO group included 21 pts on checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), 16 pts on HD-IL2, 4 pts on other IO. 1L ORR was 39.7% for VEGFI (95% CI 31.8-48.0) and 31.7% for IO (95% CI 18.1-48.1) and was not statistically significant (NS, OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.65-3.23, p = 0.371). Median TOT for 1L therapy was 11.6m for VEGFI and 6.5m for IO (p = 0.0106). With a median follow-up of 51.5m, the median OS (mOS) for all pts from time of metastatic disease was 7.7 years (y) (95% CI 6.3-10.3). The mOS for pts who received 1L VEGFI was 7.6y (95% CI 5.5-9.5) and was not reached (NR) for those who got 1L IO (95%CI 6.5-NR); this difference was significant with an unadjusted p-value of 0.029. The pair-wise comparison between mOS of the 1L CPI subgroup compared to that of the 1L VEGFI group was significant (p = 0.0148). Conclusions: Consistent with the literature, mRCC pts with involvement of the pancreas in this study have prolonged OS compared to historical OS for the standard mRCC population. Additionally, our findings suggest that the choice of first-line therapy may impact outcomes. Additional analyses will be presented.[Table: see text]

A randomized phase II study comparing cisplatin and gemcitabine with or without berzosertib in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

4507

Background: Cisplatin with gemcitabine (CG) remains the standard upfront chemotherapy regimen for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Preclinical synergy was noted between cisplatin and berzosertib, a selective ATR inhibitor. The current study sought to determine if the combination of berzosertib and CG could improve clinical outcomes in mUC. Methods: An open-label, randomized study was conducted across 23 centers in the United States through the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network of the National Cancer Institute. Key eligibility criteria included confirmed mUC, no prior cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease, ≥ 12 months since perioperative therapy and eligibility for cisplatin based on standard criteria. Patients (pts) were randomized to receive either CG alone (control arm) or CG plus berzosertib (experimental arm). In the control arm, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin was given on day 1 and gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In the experimental arm, 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin was given on day 1, gemcitabine at 875 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and berzosertib at 90 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including response rate (RR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: A total of 87 pts (median age 67; M:F 68:19) were randomized; 41 pts received CG alone while 46 received CG with berzosertib. Visceral metastases were present in 49% of pts and 52%, 45% and 3% of pts were Bajorin risk 0, 1 and 2, respectively. Median PFS was 8.0 months for both arms (Bajorin risk adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-2.08). RR was 54%(4 CR, 21 PR) in the CG with berzosertib arm and 63% (4 CR, 22 PR) in CG alone arm (P = 0.66). Median OS was shorter with CG with berzosertib as compared to CG alone (14.4 versus 19.8 months; Bajorin risk adjusted HR 1.42, 95%CI 0.76-2.68). Notably higher rates of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (59% vs 39%) and neutropenia (37% vs 27%) were observed with CG plus berzosertib compared to CG alone. Higher rates of toxicity-related discontinuation were seen in the experimental arm (24% vs 15%), and the median cumulative cisplatin dose in the experimental arm was 250 mg/m2, as compared to 370 mg/m2 in the control arm (P < 0.001). Conclusions: No improvement in PFS was observed with the addition of berzosertib to CG, and a trend towards inferior survival was observed. These results suggest caution in reducing the starting dose of cytotoxic therapy to accommodate addition of a myelosuppressive agent, as in the experimental arm of this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02567409.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With Bevacizumab or Placebo in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results of CALGB 90601 (Alliance)

PURPOSE

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) is a standard therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Based on data that angiogenesis plays a role in urothelial carcinoma growth and progression, a randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed with the primary objective of testing whether patients treated with GC and bevacizumab (GCB) have superior overall survival (OS) than patients treated with GC and placebo (GCP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2009 and December 2014, 506 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and no neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months were randomly assigned to receive either GCB or GCP. The primary end point was OS, with secondary end points of progression-free survival, objective response, and toxicity.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 76.3 months among alive patients, the median OS was 14.5 months for patients treated with GCB and 14.3 months for patients treated with GCP (hazard ratio for death = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.05; two-sided stratified log-rank P = .14). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months for GCB and 6.7 months for GCP (hazard ratio = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.95; P = .016). The proportion of patients with grade 3 or greater adverse events did not differ significantly between both arms, although increased bevacizumab-related toxicities such as hypertension and proteinuria occurred in the bevacizumab-treated arm.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to GC did not result in improved OS. The observed median OS of about 14 months is consistent with prior phase III trials of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Calcitriol-mediated hypercalcemia as an immune-related adverse event in a patient receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, case report

BACKGROUND

Severe hypercalcemia is often associated with uncontrolled malignancy through several mechanisms. However, calcitriol-mediated hypercalcemia is a rare etiology for advanced solid tumors.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of calcitriol-mediated hypercalcemia secondary to immune checkpoint inhibition in a responder with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In this case, a 68 year old male with metastatic ccRCC to the liver within 4 months of right radical nephrectomy went on to develop hypercalcemia (12.8 mg/dL) shortly following 2 cycles of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Additional testing showed an elevated calcitriol level (142 pg/mL), low parathyroid hormone (PTH) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) levels, and a normal 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. FDG-PET imaging showed hypermetabolic mediastinal, hilar, and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy, however the subsequent lymph node biopsy only showed reactive lymphoid cells without malignancy or granuloma. The hypercalcemia was resistant to initial therapy with calcitonin, hydration, and zoledronic acid but quickly responded to high-dose prednisone (1 mg/kg), followed by normalization of calcitriol levels. The patient was rechallenged with nivolumab and ipilimumab which provided a partial response after 4 cycles. He was maintained on low dose prednisone (10 mg daily) leading to a sustained resolution of his hypercalcemia.

CONCLUSION

This case suggests calcitriol-mediated hypercalcemia as a novel immune-related adverse event.

Risk Factors for Emergency Room and Hospital Care Among Patients With Solid Tumors on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being increasingly used across cancer types. Emergency room (ER) and inpatient (IP) care, common in patients with cancer, remain poorly defined in this specific population, and risk factors for such care are unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts for patients with solid tumors who received >1 ICI dose at 1 of 2 sites from January 1, 2011 to April 28, 2017. Demographics, medical history, cancer diagnosis/therapy/toxicity details, and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive data detailing ER/IP care at the 2 associated hospitals during ICI therapy (from first dose to 3 mo after last dose) were collected. The Fisher exact test and multivariate regression analysis was used to study differences between patients with versus without ER/IP care during ICI treatment.

RESULTS

Among 345 patients studied, 50% had at least 1 ER visit during ICI treatment and 43% had at least 1 IP admission. Six percent of ER/IP visits eventually required intensive care. A total of 12% of ER/IP visits were associated with suspected or confirmed immune-related adverse events. Predictors of ER care were African-American race (odds ratio [OR]: 3.83, P=0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 3.12, P=0.007), and coronary artery disease (OR: 2.43, P=0.006). Predictors of IP care were African-American race (OR: 2.38, P=0.024), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 2.29, P=0.045), chronic kidney disease (OR: 3.89, P=0.006), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker medication use (OR: 0.44, P=0.009), and liver metastasis (OR: 2.32, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding demographic and clinical risk factors for ER/IP care among patients on ICIs can help highlight disparities, prospectively identify high-risk patients, and inform preventive programs aimed at reducing such care.

Co-occurrence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 and spinal neurofibromatosis: a case report

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN) type 4 is a rare genetic condition that results from variants of the CDKN1B gene and predisposes individuals to develop endocrine tumors. Spinal neurofibromatosis (SNF) is an uncommon subtype of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) characterized by bilateral neurofibromas of all spinal roots. Here we report a case of the co-occurrence of these syndromes, which has not yet been described in the literature. A male in his 60s presented with Gleason 5 + 4 localized prostate adenocarcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy. Two years later, he developed liver and bone metastasis consistent with trans-differentiation into small cell carcinoma. He developed hypercalcemia due to primary hyperparathyroidism from a parathyroid adenoma treated surgically. His family history was significant for a first-degree relative with a clinical diagnosis of NF1 and several second-degree relatives with multiple café-au-lait macules. Spine MRI showed multiple bilateral neurofibromas. Germline genetic testing showed a pathogenic variant in the CDKN1B gene, a variant in the NF1 gene, and a normal MEN1 gene. In this rare case of MEN4 and SNF, the patient was asymptomatic for much of his life. In addition to parathyroid adenoma and spinal neurofibromas, he had prostate adenocarcinoma with trans-differentiation into metastatic small cell cancer. Whether this diagnosis was coincidental or related to an emerging phenotype remains to be elucidated.

Final results from a phase I trial and expansion cohorts of cabozantinib and nivolumab (CaboNivo) alone or with ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) for metastatic genitourinary tumors

3

Background: CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi showed promising efficacy and safety in a dose-escalation phase I study in patients (pts) with metastatic genitourinary (mGU) tumors. We now report the final results from a pooled analysis of the phase I dose-finding and 7 subsequent expansion cohorts. Methods: Pts with mGU tumors in the phase I cohort received 8 escalating doses of CaboNivo or CaboNivoIpi. In the 7 expansion cohorts, pts received the recommended phase II dose for CaboNivo (cabo 40mg qd + nivo 3mg/kg q2wks in 28-day cycles) and for CaboNivoIpi (CaboNivo same dose + ipi 1mg/kg q3wks in 21-day cycles x 4 cycles followed by CaboNivo). The CaboNivo expansion cohorts included pts with urothelial carcinoma (UC); clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bladder adenocarcinoma (BlaAdeno), and other rare mGU tumors. The CaboNivoIpi expansion cohorts included, UC, RCC, and penile carcinoma (penile). The objectives of the study were to determine the clinical activity, safety and tolerability of both combinations. A secondary objective was the detection of EpCAM+ circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Biomarker correlatives of plasma VEGFA/VEGFR2, PIGF, and inflammatory cytokines will be presented. Results: A total of 120 pts (median age 59; range 20-82) were enrolled: 54 in the phase I and 66 in the dose expansion cohorts. 64 pts received CaboNivo and 56 CaboNivoIpi. Median follow-up was 40.4 months (range 2.2-62.2 months). The ORR for 108 evaluable pts was 38% (95% CI: 28.8-47.8%) with 12 complete responses (CRs) (11.1%) and 29 partial responses (26.9%). The ORRs for the following mGU tumors were: UC 42.4% (n=33) with CR=21.2%; RCC 62.5% (n=16); prostate cancer 11.1% (n=9); germ cell tumor no responses (n=6); BlaAdeno 20% (n=15); penile 44.4% (n=9); bladder squamous 85.7 (n=7); renal medullary 50% (n=2); bladder small cell 33.1 (n=3). The median overall survival for the entire population was 15.9 months (95% CI: 11.6-23.9); 24.9 months (95% CI: 11.8-41.6) for pts with UC (n=39); and 38.6 months (95% CI: 19.4-not estimable) for RCC (n=16). Median duration of response was 22.8 months (95% CI: 18.3-40.1 months) for all pts, 32.1 months [95% CI: 20.3-NE)] for the UC pts and 20.1 months (95% CI: 5.8-NE) for RCC pts. Grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 84% and 80% of pts treated with CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi pts respectively, and included hypophosphatemia (25% and 16%), lipase elevation (20% and 20%), fatigue (20% and 18%), ALT elevation (5% and 14%), AST elevation (9% and 11%), diarrhea (9% and 11%), and thromboembolic event (11% and 4%). One pt had Grade 5 pneumonitis on CaboNivoIpi. Baseline EpCAM+ CTC count of < 5 vs. > 5, was associated with longer median OS (24.3 vs. 12.3 months p=0.037). Conclusions: CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi demonstrated promising clinical activity and manageable safety in many mGU histologies including rare tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02496208.

A phase 1 trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor AR-42 in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2-associated tumors and advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

Given clinical activity of AR-42, an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, in hematologic malignancies and preclinical activity in solid tumors, this phase 1 trial investigated the safety and tolerability of AR-42 in patients with advanced solid tumors, including neurofibromatosis type 2-associated meningiomas and schwannomas (NF2). The primary objective was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives included determining pharmacokinetics and clinical activity.

METHODS

This phase I trial was an open-label, single-center, dose-escalation study of single-agent AR-42 in primary central nervous system and advanced solid tumors. The study followed a 3 + 3 design with an expansion cohort at the MTD.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were enrolled with NF2 (n = 5), urothelial carcinoma (n = 3), breast cancer (n = 2), non-NF2-related meningioma (n = 2), carcinoma of unknown primary (n = 2), small cell lung cancer (n = 1), Sertoli cell carcinoma (n = 1), and uveal melanoma (n = 1). The recommended phase II dose is 60 mg three times weekly, for 3 weeks of a 28-day cycle. DLTs included grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 psychosis. The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytopenias, fatigue, and nausea. The best response was stable disease in 53% of patients (95% CI 26.6-78.7). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months (95% CI 1.2-9.1). Among evaluable patients with NF2 or meningioma (n = 5), median PFS was 9.1 months (95% CI 1.9-not reached).

CONCLUSION

Single-agent AR-42 is safe and well tolerated. Further studies may consider AR-42 in a larger cohort of patients with NF2 or in combination with other agents in advanced solid tumors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01129193, registered 5/24/2010.

Circulating Tumor Cell Subtypes and T-cell Populations as Prognostic Biomarkers to Combination Immunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Genitourinary Cancer

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are under investigation as a minimally invasive liquid biopsy that may improve risk stratification and treatment selection. CTCs uniquely allow for digital pathology of individual malignant cell morphology and marker expression. We compared CTC features and T-cell counts with survival endpoints in a cohort of patients with metastatic genitourinary cancer treated with combination immunotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Markers evaluated included pan-CK/CD45/PD-L1/DAPI for CTCs and CD4/CD8/Ki-67/DAPI for T cells. ANOVA was used to compare CTC burden and T-cell populations across timepoints. Differences in survival and disease progression were evaluated using the maximum log-rank test.

RESULTS

From December 2016 to January 2019, 183 samples from 81 patients were tested. CTCs were found in 75% of patients at baseline. CTC burden was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) at baseline (P = 0.022), but not on-therapy. Five morphologic subtypes were detected, and the presence of two specific subtypes with unique cellular features at baseline and on-therapy was associated with worse OS (0.9-2.3 vs. 28.2 months; P < 0.0001-0.013). Increasing CTC heterogeneity on-therapy had a trend toward worse OS (P = 0.045). PD-L1⁺ CTCs on-therapy were associated with worse OS (P < 0.01, cycle 2). Low baseline and on-therapy CD4/CD8 counts were also associated with poor OS and response category.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter survival may be associated with high CTC counts at baseline, presence of specific CTC morphologic subtypes, PD-L1⁺ CTCs, and low %CD4/8 T cells in patients with metastatic genitourinary cancer. A future study is warranted to validate the prognostic utility of CTC heterogeneity and detection of specific CTC morphologies.

Alterations of DNA damage response genes correlate with response and overall survival in anti-PD-1/PD-L1-treated advanced urothelial cancer

DNA damage response (DDR) gene alterations in cancer are associated with a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) and may impact clinical outcomes of urothelial cancer (UC). Here, we explore the prognostic role of DDR alterations in advanced UC treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. The study included 53 patients who had FoundationOne genomic sequencing and received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Fisher exact test and trend test were used to assess differences in objective response rate (ORR). Overall survival (OS) was measured from the time of initial UC diagnosis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The cohort had a median age of 66 with 64% receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. DDR alterations (including ATM) were associated with a non-significantly higher ORR to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade (41% vs. 21%, p = 0.136). Patients with DDR alterations (excluding ATM) had non-significantly longer OS, likely due to a small sample size (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.20-1.38, p = 0.19). ATM alterations were associated with a non-significantly higher ORR (40% vs. 29%, p = 0.6), but also with significantly shorter OS (HR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.65-19.74, p = 0.006). Patients with ≥ 3 DDR alterations (including ATM) had substantially higher TMB (p = 0.01) and higher ORR (80%) with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade versus 24% ORR in patients with <3 DDR alterations. In summary, DDR alterations were associated with non-significantly higher ORR and longer OS for patients with advanced UC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. ATM alterations were associated with shorter OS.

Results of a multicenter, phase 2 study of nivolumab and ipilimumab for patients with advanced rare genitourinary malignancies

BACKGROUND

In this multicenter, single-arm, multicohort, phase 2 trial, the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab was evaluated in patients with advanced rare genitourinary cancers, including bladder and upper tract carcinoma of variant histology (BUTCVH), adrenal tumors, platinum-refractory germ cell tumors, penile carcinoma, and prostate cancer of variant histology (NCT03333616).

METHODS

Patients with rare genitourinary malignancies and no prior immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure were enrolled. Patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab at 1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, and this was followed by 480 mg of nivolumab intravenously every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled at 6 institutions between April 2018 and July 2019 in 3 cohorts: BUTCVH (n = 19), adrenal tumors (n = 18), and other tumors (n = 18). The median follow-up was 9.9 months (range, 1 to 21 months). Twenty-eight patients (51%) received 4 doses of nivolumab and ipilimumab; 25 patients received nivolumab maintenance for a median of 4 cycles (range, 1-18 cycles). The ORR for the entire study was 16% (80% confidence interval, 10%-25%); the ORR in the BUTCVH cohort, including 2 complete responses, was 37%, and it was 6% in the other 2 cohorts. Twenty-two patients (40%) developed treatment-related grade 3 or higher toxicities; 24% (n = 13) required high-dose steroids (≥40 mg of prednisone or the equivalent). Grade 5 events occurred in 3 patients; 1 death was treatment related.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in objective responses in a subset of patients with rare genitourinary malignancies, especially those with BUTCVH. An additional cohort exploring their activity in genitourinary tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation is ongoing.

LAY SUMMARY

Patients with rare cancers are often excluded from studies and have limited treatment options. Fifty-five patients with rare tumors of the genitourinary system were enrolled from multiple sites and were treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab, a regimen used for kidney cancer. The regimen showed activity in some patients, particularly those with bladder or upper tract cancers of unusual or variant histology; 37% of those patients responded to therapy. Additional studies are ongoing to better determine who benefits the most from this combination.

Phase I Study of Cabozantinib and Nivolumab Alone or With Ipilimumab for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and Other Genitourinary Tumors

PURPOSE

We assessed the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib and nivolumab (CaboNivo) and CaboNivo plus ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and other genitourinary (GU) malignances.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received escalating doses of CaboNivo or CaboNivoIpi. The primary objective was to establish a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled at eight dose levels with a median follow-up time of 44.6 months; data cutoff was January 20, 2020. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75% and 87% of patients treated with CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi, respectively, and included fatigue (17% and 10%, respectively), diarrhea (4% and 7%, respectively), and hypertension (21% and 10%, respectively); grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs included hepatitis (0% and 13%, respectively) and colitis (0% and 7%, respectively). The RP2D was cabozantinib 40 mg/d plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg for CaboNivo and cabozantinib 40 mg/d, nivolumab 3 mg/kg, and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg for CaboNivoIpi. ORR was 30.6% (95% CI, 20.0% to 47.5%) for all patients and 38.5% (95% CI, 13.9% to 68.4%) for patients with mUC. Median DoR was 21.0 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 24.1 months) for all patients and not reached for patients with mUC. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 6.9 months) for all patients and 12.8 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 24.1 months) for patients with mUC. Median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 18.8 months) for all patients and 25.4 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 41.6 months) for patients with mUC.

CONCLUSION

CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi demonstrated manageable toxicities with durable responses and encouraging survival in patients with mUC and other GU tumors. Multiple phase II and III trials are ongoing for these combinations.

Usage of stem cells in oral and maxillofacial region

Malformations of the maxillofacial region has disturbing psychosocial effects and causes enormous socioeconomic concerns. The management of maxillofacial defects caused by congenital anomalies, trauma, osteoporotic fractures, periodontitis, or cancer treatment is challenging for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Numerous approaches have been recommended for the managing of these deficiencies. The traditional treatment for maxillofacial defects or their repair is an intricate process by autologous bone grafts from the scapula, ribs, fibula, or iliac crest origins. Regenerative medicine is well thought-out as a perfect substitute approach for autologous bone grafts to renovate bone deficiencies. The use of stem cells has improved results and offered a technique to reconstruct craniofacial bone defects. The field of tissue engineering for the regeneration of maxillofacial needs integration of biochemical and biomaterial engineering aspects with cell transplantation to generate better-quality biomimetic scaffolds, prevascularize three-dimensional (3D) tissue structures, and engineer the composite interface of diverse facial tissues. In this review, we have discussed the application of different adult stem cells to repair oral and maxillofacial defects in animal models and clinical trials.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 1.2021

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the guidelines, including changes to certain systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC. They also discuss the addition of a new section to the guidelines that identifies and describes the most common hereditary RCC syndromes and provides recommendations for genetic testing, surveillance, and/or treatment options for patients who are suspected or confirmed to have one of these syndromes.

A randomized phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab and acalabrutinib in patients with platinum-resistant metastatic urothelial cancer

Background

Inhibition of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) pathway has demonstrated clinical benefit in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, response rates of 15% to 26% highlight the need for more effective therapies. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition may suppress myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and improve T‐cell activation.

Methods

The Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Acalabrutinib and Pembrolizumab Immunotherapy Dual Checkpoint Inhibition in Platinum‐Resistant Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (RAPID CHECK; also known as ACE‐ST‐005) was a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab with or without the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib for patients with platinum‐refractory mUC. The primary objectives were safety and objective response rates (ORRs) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Immune profiling was performed to analyze circulating monocytic MDSCs and T cells.

Results

Seventy‐five patients were treated with pembrolizumab (n = 35) or pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib (n = 40). The ORR was 26% with pembrolizumab (9% with a complete response [CR]) and 20% with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib (10% with a CR). The grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) that occurred in ≥15% of the patients were anemia (20%) with pembrolizumab and fatigue (23%), increased alanine aminotransferase (23%), urinary tract infections (18%), and anemia (18%) with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib. One patient treated with pembrolizumab plus acalabrutinib had high MDSCs at the baseline, which significantly decreased at week 7. Overall, MDSCs were not correlated with a clinical response, but some subsets of CD8+ T cells did increase during the combination treatment.

Conclusions

Both treatments were generally well tolerated, although serious AE rates were higher with the combination. Acalabrutinib plus pembrolizumab did not improve the ORR, PFS, or OS in comparison with pembrolizumab alone in mUC. Baseline and on‐treatment peripheral monocytic MDSCs were not different in the treatment cohorts. Proliferating CD8+ T‐cell subsets increased during treatment, particularly in the combination cohort. Ongoing studies are correlating these peripheral immunome findings with tissue‐based immune cell infiltration.

In this randomized phase 2 study of metastatic urothelial cancer, a combination of pembrolizumab and a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (acalabrutinib) does not improve clinical outcomes in comparison with pembrolizumab alone. Comprehensive flow cytometry is used to evaluate circulating immune cells during treatment.