Colorectal neoplasms detected colonoscopically in at-risk members of colorectal cancer families stratified by the demonstration of DNA microsatellite instability

Lessons from Lynch syndrome: a tumor biology-based approach to familial colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) develops within precursor lesions in the single-celled epithelial lining of the gut. The two most common epithelial lesions are the adenoma and the serrated polyp. CRC is also one of the most familial of the common cancers, and just as there are syndromes associated with increased risk of CRC arising in adenomas, there are also syndromes with increased CRC risk associated with serrated polyps. In this article, we describe the features of such a syndrome, familial serrated neoplasia, which distinguish it from the well-characterized condition Lynch syndrome (or hereditary nonpolyposis CRC), and show that the molecular pathology of tumors forms the basis for this distinction. Lynch syndrome CRC arises almost exclusively within adenomatous precursor lesions, in contrast with familial serrated neoplasia where at least half of the cancers develop in serrated polyps. Finally, rare families exist in which both conditions segregate independently, producing a difficult diagnostic picture.

Differences between familial and sporadic forms of colorectal cancer with DNA microsatellite instability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is observed in approximately 13% of colorectal cancers. Genes containing a mononucleotide microsatellite in the coding sequence are particularly prone to inactivation in MSI tumourigenesis, and much work has been conducted to identify genes with high repetitive tract mutation rates in these tumours. MSI caused by deficient DNA mismatch-repair functions is a hallmark of cancers associated with the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome but is also found in about 15% of all sporadic tumours.

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: The rise and fall of a confusing term

The term Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is a poor descriptor of the syndrome described by Lynch. Over the last decade, the term has been applied to heterogeneous groups of families meeting limited clinical criteria, for example the Amsterdam criteria. It is now apparent that not all Amsterdam criteria-positive families have the Lynch syndrome. The term HNPCC has also been applied to clinical scenarios in which CRCs with DNA microsatellite instability are diagnosed but in which there is no vertical transmission of an altered DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene. A term that has multiple, mutually incompatible meanings is highly problematic, particularly when it may influence the management of an individual family. The Lynch syndrome is best understood as a hereditary predisposition to malignancy that is explained by a germline mutation in a DNA MMR gene. The diagnosis does not depend in an absolute sense on any particular family pedigree structure or age of onset of malignancy. Families with a strong family history of colorectal cancer that do not have Lynch syndrome have been grouped as ‘Familial Colorectal Cancer Type-X’. The first step in characterizing these cancer families is to distinguish them from Lynch syndrome. The term HNPCC no longer serves any useful purpose and should be phased out.

What's new in hereditary colorectal cancer?

Precancerous polyposes other than classic familial adenomatous polyposis and the condition hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, or Lynch syndrome, continue to present major diagnostic challenges for the anatomic pathologist. This editorial highlights the practical significance of novel insights and clinical guidelines in the recent literature, as well as in 4 contributions to this edition of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. The first section will address attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis and a newly recognized type of autosomal-recessive adenomatous polyposis associated with the DNA repair gene MYH. The remainder of the editorial discusses the role of the revised Bethesda guidelines in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and concludes with the recently identified serrated pathway syndrome.

Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes

Colorectal cancer is one of the major causes of cancer deaths in both men and women. It is estimated that approximately 5% to 10% of patients with colorectal cancer have an inherited germline mutation that predisposes them to cancer. Clinically, hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes can be divided into those associated with colonic polyposis (familial adenomatous polyposis, attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis, and MYH-associated polyposis) and those not associated with colonic polyposis (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer). Treatment options for these patients include multiple aggressive screening regimens, chemopreventive medications, and prophylactic surgery. Selection of the appropriate management approach is best made using information obtained from the patient's clinical examination, the family medical history, and genetic evaluation. Compliance is improved when patients completely understand their disease and participate fully in the formulation of the treatment plan. Although not proved, it seems reasonable that this approach may prevent the poor outcomes so frequently associated with inherited cancer syndromes.

Distinction between familial and sporadic forms of colorectal cancer showing DNA microsatellite instability

Attempts to classify colorectal cancer into subtypes based upon molecular characterisation are overshadowed by the classical stepwise model in which the adenoma-carcinoma sequence serves as the morphological counterpart. Clarity is achieved when cancers showing DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) are distinguished as sporadic MSI-low (MSI-L), sporadic MSI-high (MSI-H) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Divergence of the 'methylator' pathway into MSI-L and MSI-H is at least partly determined by the respective silencing of MGMT and hMLH1. Multiple differences can be demonstrated between sporadic and familial (HNPCC) MSI-H colorectal cancer with respect to early mechanisms, evolution, molecular characterisation, demographics and morphology. By acknowledging the existence of multiple pathways, rapid advances in the fields of basic and translational research will occur and this will lead to improved strategies for the prevention, early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability

Cancer with high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is the hallmark of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, and MSI-H occurs in approximately 15% of sporadic colorectal carcinomas that have improved prognosis. We examined the utility of histopathology for the identification of MSI-H cancers by evaluating the features of 323 sporadic carcinomas using specified criteria and comparing the results to MSI-H status. Coded hematoxylin and eosin sections were evaluated for tumor features (signet ring cells; mucinous histology; cribriforming, poor differentiation, and medullary-type pattern; sponge-like mucinous growth; pushing invasive margin) and features of host immune response (Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction, intratumoral lymphocytic infiltrate, and intraepithelial T cells by immunohistochemistry for CD3 with morphometry). Interobserver variation among five pathologists was determined. Subjective interpretation of histopathology as an indication for MSI testing was recorded. We found that medullary carcinoma, intraepithelial lymphocytosis, and poor differentiation were the best discriminators between MSI-H and microsatellite-stable cancers (odds ratio: 37.8, 9.8, and 4.0, respectively; P = 0.000003 to < 0.000001) with high specificity (99 to 87%). The sensitivities, however, were very low (14 to 38%), and interobserver agreement was good only for evaluation of poor differentiation (kappa, 0.69). Mucinous histopathological type and presence of signet ring cells had low odds ratios of 3.3 and 2.7 (P = 0.005 and P = 0.02) with specificities of 95% but sensitivities of only 15 and 13%. Subjective interpretation of the overall histopathology as suggesting MSI-H performed better than any individual feature; the odds ratio was 7.5 (P < 0.000001) with sensitivity of 49%, specificity of 89%, and moderate interobserver agreement (kappa, 0.52). Forty intraepithelial CD3-positive lymphocytes/0.94 mm2, as established by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, resulted in an odds ratio of 6.0 (P < 0.000001) with sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 67%. Our findings indicate that histopathological evaluation can be used to prioritize sporadic colon cancers for MSI studies, but morphological prediction of MSI-H has low sensitivity, requiring molecular analysis for therapeutic decisions.

Microsatellite alterations and TP53 mutations in plasma DNA of small-cell lung cancer patients: follow-up study and prognostic significance

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), one of the major types of lung cancer, is associated with many different somatic molecular genetic changes. These alterations, observed in tumor DNA, have also been identified in the plasma DNA of patients. We undertook the present study to make a prospective investigation into the correlation between abnormal plasma DNA and patient survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients with SCLC were selected after histological diagnosis. Polymorphic markers (ACTBP2, UT762 and AR) were chosen for their reported high rate of alterations in SCLC and analyzed in tumor tissue, normal blood cells and plasma DNA. Furthermore, we looked for mutations of the TP53 gene in tumor and plasma DNA.

RESULTS

In 25 patients (71%) at least one molecular change precisely matching that of the primary tumor was detected in the plasma DNA. No difference in survival was observed between patients with aberrant plasma DNA and patients without plasma DNA alterations. However, patients with microsatellite modifications and TP53 mutations concomitantly, showed a significant difference (P = 0.02) in survival compared with patients bearing only one of these molecular changes. In 15 cases it was possible to find a correlation either between tumor response and disappearance of abnormal plasma DNA, or tumor progression and persistence of plasma DNA alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Free plasma DNA with molecular alterations is present to a high degree in plasma DNA of SCLC patients and may have a role as a prognostic factor.

Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes (MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, PMS2, and MSH6) cause susceptibility to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. We assessed the prevalence of MSH2 and MLH1 mutations in families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and evaluated whether clinical findings can predict the outcome of genetic testing.

METHODS

We used denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to identify MSH2 and MLH1 mutations in 184 kindreds with familial clustering of colorectal cancer or other cancers associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Information on the site of cancer, the age at diagnosis, and the number of affected family members was obtained from all families.

RESULTS

Mutations of MSH2 or MLH1 were found in 47 of the 184 kindreds (26 percent). Clinical factors associated with these mutations were early age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer, the occurrence in the kindred of endometrial cancer or tumors of the small intestine, a higher number of family members with colorectal or endometrial cancer, the presence of multiple colorectal cancers or both colorectal and endometrial cancers in a single family member, and fulfillment of the Amsterdam criteria for the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (at least three family members in two or more successive generations must have colorectal cancer, one of whom is a first-degree relative of the other two; cancer must be diagnosed before the age of 50 in at least one family member; and familial adenomatous polyposis must be ruled out). Multivariate analysis showed that a younger age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer, fulfillment of the Amsterdam criteria, and the presence of endometrial cancer in the kindred were independent predictors of germ-line mutations of MSH2 or MLH1. These results were used to devise a logistic model for estimating the likelihood of a mutation in MSH2 and MLH1.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of clinical findings can improve the rate of detection of mutations of DNA mismatch-repair genes in families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Familial and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: issues relevant for surgical practice

About 15% of patients with colorectal cancer report a family history of this disease. An estimated 1%-5% of patients have hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Recently, DNA mismatch repair genes associated with this syndrome were identified. For about 50% of families in which HNPCC occurs, DNA-based diagnosis and presymptomatic DNA testing are now feasible. Diagnosis of a hereditary tumour syndrome is relevant for both the patient with cancer and his or her close relatives. The complexities of family studies warrant the forming of a multidisciplinary team which may choose to work within a specialized cancer family clinic.

Diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

The term hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) was introduced initially to encompass autosomal dominant syndromes predisposing to colorectal cancer other than the polyposes. The term is a poor descriptor and is often applied to families on the basis of inadequate information. It is suggested that 'hereditary mismatch repair deficiency syndrome' (HMRDS) should replace the term HNPCC for describing the specific autosomal dominant condition which predisposes to cancer displaying the mutator phenotype. Population-based studies have shown that HMRDS probably accounts for no more than 2% of bowel cancer. A working diagnosis of HMRDS can be made on the basis of clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics. The histopathologist has an important role to play in the recognition and diagnosis of HMRDS. The characteristic morphology of colorectal cancer in HMRDS is reviewed and the diagnostic utility of 'field changes' and adenomas is discussed critically.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an update

Sporadic cancer develops approximately at 65 years of age. Epidemiologic data suggest that dietary factors probably are the most influential in colorectal carcinogenesis. In contrast, individuals who have relatives with colorectal neoplasia have an increased risk of these tumors themselves, which will appear earlier in life. The actual incidence of hereditary colorectal cancer is unknown. However, the incidence is much higher compared with well-known hereditary colorectal diseases, such as familial adenomatous polyposis.

OBJECTIVE

An overview of the recent progress in the field of both clinical and basic research on hereditary colorectal cancer must be made.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two family pedigrees were analyzed at Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, including the largest family pedigree in Japan, which contained 24 cases of colorectal cancer occurring over five generations. In 1995, when the International Symposium on Hereditary Cancer was held in Hamamatsu, 4,109 family pedigrees were investigated and analyzed, including 394 cases in 109 family pedigrees that met the Amsterdam Minimum Criteria. Information was collected by sending questionnaires to major hospitals in Japan. Basic updated data presented at the eighth and ninth International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Colorectal Cancer were also quoted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Because of the discovery of mismatch repair genes as that responsible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, modification of the Amsterdam Criteria is necessary. Replication error, as a mutator phenotype of mismatch repair genes, is a useful predictor of second primary malignancies. Surveillance or prophylactic surgery is still a controversial issue.