Herrmann T, Hofmann K, Nagel NE, Asmuss A, Hünig T, Wonigeit K. Differential CD4/CD8 subset-specific expression of highly homologous rat Tcrb-V8 family members suggests a role of CDR2 and/or CDR4 (HV4) in MHC class-specific thymic selection.
Int Immunol 1999;
11:435-44. [PMID:
10221655 DOI:
10.1093/intimm/11.3.435]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Different rat Tcrb haplotypes express either TCR beta variable segment (Tcrb-V) 8.2l or 8.4a. Both V segments bind the mAb R78 but differ by one conservative substitution (L14V) and clusters of two and four substitutions in the complementarity-determining region (CDR) 2 and CDR4 [hypervariable loop 4 (HV4)]. Independently of MHC alleles numbers of R78+ CD4+ cells are lower in Tcrb-V8.2l-expressing than in Tcrb-V8.4a-expressing strains. Expression of R78+ TCR during T cell development, analysis of backcross populations and generation of a Tcrb congenic strain [LEW.TCRB(AS)] define two mechanisms how Tcrb haplotypes affect the frequency of R78+ cells, one acting prior to thymic selection leading to up to 2-fold higher frequency of Tcrb-V8.4a versus Tcrb-V8.2l in unselected thymocytes and another occurring between the TCRlow and the CD4/CD8 single-positive stage. The latter leads to a 50% reduction of frequency of Tcrb-V8.4a CD8+ cells but not CD4+ cells and does not affect either subset of Tcrb-V8.2l cells. A comparison of rat classical class I MHC (RT1.A) sequences and current models of TCR-MHC-peptide interaction suggests that this reduction in frequency of Tcrb-V8.4a CD8 cells may be a consequence of differential selection of Tcrb-V8.2l versus Tcrb-V8.4a TCR by differential binding of CDR2beta to highly conserved areas of C-terminal parts of the alpha helices of class I MHC molecules.
Collapse