Interference in thyrotropin (TSH) determination: falsely elevated TSH values in a transplanted patient

False-Positive Light Chain Clonal Restriction by Flow Cytometry in Patients Treated With Alemtuzumab: Potential Pitfalls for the Misdiagnosis of B-Cell Neoplasms

Objectives

To increase awareness of potential diagnostic test interference associated with alemtuzumab, which is a therapeutic immunoglobulin G1 κ monoclonal antibody used in hematologic malignancies, autoimmune diseases, and transplant-related disorders.

Methods

Bone marrow and blood from patients with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia treated with alemtuzumab were evaluated by flow cytometry. Healthy donor blood was analyzed with or without in vitro treatment with alemtuzumab for comparison.

Results

Immunophenotypic analysis of bone marrow collected 4 weeks after alemtuzumab treatment demonstrated artifactual surface κ light chain restriction in CD19+ B cells and CD3+ T cells. Similar findings were observed in blood from another patient in a specimen collected 3 days after alemtuzumab treatment. These findings were recapitulated in healthy donor blood incubated with alemtuzumab.

Conclusions

Alemtuzumab can produce direct interference during flow cytometry analysis, resulting in false-positive evidence of light chain clonality. Clinicians and laboratorians should be cognizant of this risk to avoid misdiagnosis of B-cell neoplasms.

The interference of monoclonal antibodies with laboratory diagnosis: clinical and diagnostic implications

Diagnostic test interference is due to the presence of material that falsely changes an analytic test result. The development of monoclonal antibodies is discussed with focus on their extensive use as both therapeutic and diagnostic agents. In this review the interference of monoclonal antibodies with laboratory test methods and the potential impact on clinical care is addressed. Recognition of the types of interference, endogenous and exogenous, and the varied mechanisms by which monoclonal antibodies may cause interference are discussed in this report. Review of the literature identifies cases which exemplify the issues facing laboratorians and clinicians and describe the impact on patients. Approaches to reducing and eliminating sources of interference are also addressed. Education of ordering clinicians concerning the possibility of interference in at-risk patients is key in limiting the impact on care. Laboratorians and medical practitioners should be cognizant of the risk of interference to avoid incorrect management of patients.

Macro-thyrotropin: a case report and review of literature

CONTEXT

Isolated elevation of TSH in the absence of thyroid symptoms can be very rarely caused by a macromolecule formed between TSH and Ig (macro-TSH), confounding the interpretation of thyroid function test results.

OBJECTIVE

We described the use of several commonly available laboratory-based approaches to investigate an isolated TSH elevation [232 mIU/liter; free T(4), 10 pmol/liter (reference interval, 10.0-23.0 pmol/liter), Vitros platform] in a clinically euthyroid elderly gentleman, which led to the diagnosis of macro-TSH.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TSH concentration of the patient was significantly lower (122 mIU/liter) when measured on the Advia Centaur platform. Serial dilution of the patient's sample showed a nonlinear increase in TSH recovery at increasing dilution (nonlinearity). Polyethylene glycol precipitation and mixing the patient's sample with a hypothyroid patient sample showed reduced TSH recovery, suggesting the presence of a high molecular weight interfering substance and excess TSH binding capacity, respectively. Heterophile blocking tube studies and rheumatoid factors were negative. Gel filtration chromatography demonstrated a TSH peak fraction that approximated the molecular size of IgG; together with the excess TSH binding capacity, this indicated the presence of TSH-IgG macro-TSH. A review of 12 macro-TSH case reports showed that samples with macro-TSH produce over-recovery with dilution, return negative results on anti-animal and anti-heterophile blocking studies, and commonly have recovery of less than 20% when subjected to polyethylene glycol precipitation.

CONCLUSION

Macro-TSH is an underrecognized laboratory interference. Routine laboratory techniques described above can help diagnose this rare entity. A close dialogue between the physician and the laboratory is important in approaching such cases.