Outcome of craniocerebral trauma in infants and children

Critical score of Glasgow Coma Scale for pediatric traumatic brain injury

The aim of this study is to determine the predictive critical value of the Glasgow Coma Scale for use as a determinant of outcome for children with traumatic brain injuries. A total of 309 children, aged 2-10 years, were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent the following assessments: Glasgow Coma Scale; clinical data; brain computed tomography; and Glasgow Outcome Scale assessments. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that a critical point of the Glasgow Coma Scale set at 5 was most strongly correlated with outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Subarachnoid hemorrhage with brain swelling and edema, subdural, intracerebral hemorrhage, and basal ganglion lesions were associated with severe injury and poor outcome (P < 0.05). However, cortical lesions did not affect injury severity and outcome. In injuries associated with traumatic brain injuries, only chest trauma had a tendency to be associated with poor outcome (P < 0.05). Of the factors analyzed, the score of the Glasgow Coma Scale was the most effective predictor for outcome in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, the predictive critical score of the Glasgow Coma Scale should be set at 5 for pediatric traumatic brain injury. The computed tomographic findings also were important in determining injury severity and predicting outcome.

Computerized tomography and prognosis in paediatric head injury

The authors have analysed the computerized tomography (CT) findings and their correlation with the clinical state, early and late outcome in children and adolescents with head injuries (HI). This study represents clinical and CT data of 82 consecutive HI patients under 18 years of age. Among them 51 (62%) were boys and 31 (38%) girls. The application of CT to the evaluation of the morphologic manifestations of HI in children has shown some differences in forms and mechanisms of injury and in outcome compared to adults. In the paediatric HI the most frequent finding was diffuse brain swelling with CT evidence of ventricular and cisternal compression or obliteration. Prognostically the most unfavourable findings were shearing injury, intracerebral and subdural haematomas combined with brain swelling and parenchymal damage. According to the Lidcombe impairment scale, outcome from severe paediatric HI was determined in the 3rd and 6th months, one year and 2 years after the injury. The outcome two years after severe HI varied to a great extent and was better in children than in adults. Although there was long-term disruption of the patient's quality of life, our data show that as there are no predictors of individual outcomes in child HI, no child should be excluded from early and long-term rehabilitation.

Dystonia following head trauma: a report of nine patients and review of the literature

We report nine patients who developed dystonia following head trauma. The most frequent form was hemidystonia only (six patients). One patient presented with hemidystonia plus torticollis, one with bilateral hemidystonia and one with torticollis only. Seven patients sustained a severe head injury, and two had a mild head injury. At the time of injury, six were younger than 10 years, two were adolescents, and the patient with torticollis only was an adult. Except in the patient with torticollis only, the onset of dystonia varied considerably from months to years. All patients with hemidystonia had posthemiplegic dystonia of delayed onset. Seven out of 8 patients with hemidystonia had lesions involving the contralateral caudate or putamen, as demonstrated by CT and MR. The patient with hemidystonia plus torticollis had no lesion to the basal ganglia, but a contralateral pontomesencephalic lesion. Response to medical treatment was generally poor. Functional stereotactic operations were performed in seven patients. A variety of factors may be responsible for the vascular or nonvascular posttraumatic basal ganglia lesions, which may lead to dystonia. The pathophysiology seems to be more complex than thought previously. We believe that dystonia following head injury is not as rare as is assumed. Awareness of its characteristics and optimized diagnostic procedures will lead to wider recognition of this entity.