Structural and functional characterisation of the signal recognition particle-specific 54 kDa protein (SRP54) of tomato

SRPassing Co-translational Targeting: The Role of the Signal Recognition Particle in Protein Targeting and mRNA Protection

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is an RNA and protein complex that exists in all domains of life. It consists of one protein and one noncoding RNA in some bacteria. It is more complex in eukaryotes and consists of six proteins and one noncoding RNA in mammals. In the eukaryotic cytoplasm, SRP co-translationally targets proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum and prevents misfolding and aggregation of the secretory proteins in the cytoplasm. It was demonstrated recently that SRP also possesses an earlier unknown function, the protection of mRNAs of secretory proteins from degradation. In this review, we analyze the progress in studies of SRPs from different organisms, SRP biogenesis, its structure, and function in protein targeting and mRNA protection.

Heat shock inhibits release of the signal recognition particle from the endoplasmic reticulum in barley aleurone layers

When barley (Hordeum vulgare) aleurone layers are subjected to heat shock there is a selective degradation of the normally stable mRNAs encoding secreted proteins. Messages for nonsecreted proteins are not degraded. The synthesis of heat shock proteins is not required for this selective message degradation. Our hypothesis explaining this phenomenon is that a component of the early steps in the synthesis of secreted proteins is damaged by heat shock, resulting in a selective halt in translation on secretory mRNAs, which may in turn lead to degradation of those messages. The first committed step in the synthesis of secreted proteins is the binding of the nascent signal sequence to the signal recognition particle. We have obtained cDNA clones and antibodies for the barley 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle. In cell fractionation experiments, more signal recognition particle was bound to the endoplasmic reticulum membranes and less was in the free particle fraction following a heat shock. The results suggest that heat shock inhibits the release of the signal recognition particle from the endoplasmic reticulum. This would, in turn, inhibit the resumption of translation and may be the underlying cause of the secretory message degradation.

Transport of proteins in eukaryotic cells: more questions ahead

Some newly synthesized proteins contain signals that direct their transport to their final location within or outside of the cell. Targeting signals are recognized by specific protein receptors located either in the cytoplasm or in the membrane of the target organelle. Specific membrane protein complexes are involved in insertion and translocation of polypeptides across the membranes. Often, additional targeting signals are required for a polypeptide to be further transported to its site of function. In this review, we will describe the trafficking of proteins to various cellular organelles (nucleus, chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes) with emphasis on transport to and through the secretory pathway.

Identification of a region of Bacillus subtilis Ffh, a homologue of mammalian SRP54 protein, that is essential for binding to small cytoplasmic RNA

Bacillus subtilis Ffh and scRNA are homologues of mammalian SRP54 and SRP RNA, respectively, which are components of the eukaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP). Ffh (446 amino acids) interacts with scRNA to form a stable complex in vivo. Here, we identified an RNA-binding domain of Ffh. The results obtained using a series of deletion mutants show that amino acid positions 364 to 432 in the C-terminal region of Ffh correlates with its ability to bind RNA. The amino acid sequence of this region is well conserved among members of the SRP54 protein family. This sequence contains two hydrophobic regions (h2, 364 to 391, and h3, 416 to 435), separated by the positively charged amino acid motif, 398RRKRIAKGSG407. Among the basic amino acid residues in this region, Arg-401 was essential for binding to scRNA, but Arg-399 and Lys-400 were not. The co-existence of Arg-398 and Lys-404 was necessary for the same affinity as wild type Ffh. The two glycine residues of the 405GSG407 were also essential. MH23 peptide (91 amino acids) encompassing from 356 to 446, consisting of h2-RRKRIAKGSG-h3, bound scRNA with the same affinity as wild type Ffh, whereas a 24-amino acid synthetic peptide 392DIINASRRKRIAKGSGTSVQEVNR415 did not. The region containing two hydrophobic segments separated by the positively charged motif is the minimal requirement of Ffh for RNA binding.

Comparative analysis of tertiary structure elements in signal recognition particle RNA

BACKGROUND

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein complex that associates with ribosomes to promote co-translational translocation of proteins across biological membranes. We have used comparative analysis of a large number of bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic SRP RNA sequences to derive shared tertiary SRP RNA structure elements.

RESULTS

A representative three-dimensional model of the human SRP RNA is shown that includes single-stranded intrahelical and interhelical RNA loops and incorporates data from enzymatic and chemical modification, electron microscopy, and site-directed mutagenesis. Properties of the SRP RNA model are an overall extended dumbbell-shaped structure (260 A x 70 A) with a pseudoknot in the small SRP domain (a pairing of 12-UGGC-15 with 33-GCUA-36), and a tertiary interaction in the large SRP domain (198-GA-199 with 232-GU-233).

CONCLUSIONS

The RNA 'knuckle' formed in helix 8 of SRP RNA appears to constitute the binding site for protein SRP54 or its bacterial equivalent, protein P48. A dynamic property of this feature may explain the hierarchial assembly of proteins SRP19 and SRP54 in the large SRP domain. Furthermore, the human SRP RNA model serves as a framework to understand details of the structure and function of SRP in all organisms and is presented to stimulate further experimentation in this area.

Isolation and characterization of a cDNA encoding the SecA protein from spinach chloroplasts. Evidence for azide resistance of Sec-dependent protein translocation across thylakoid membranes in spinach

Thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts in higher plants harbor different pathways for the translocation of proteins. One of these routes is related to the prokaryotic Sec pathway, which mediates the secretion of particular proteins into the periplasmic space and involves the SecA protein as an essential component. We have isolated a full size cDNA of 3739 nucleotides encoding the SecA homologue from spinach. It contains an open reading frame of 1036 codons corresponding to a polypeptide with a calculated mass of 117 kDa. The deduced amino acid sequence shows between 43 and 49% identity to SecA proteins from bacteria and lower algae and 62% identity to SecA of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC7942. Compared with the Escherichia coli protein, spinach SecA carries an amino-terminal extension of approximately 80 residues. In organello experiments performed with the protein made in vitro by transcription of the cDNA and cell-free translation of the resulting RNA showed that this extension comprises a transit peptide that mediates the import of the protein into the chloroplast. The processed product of approximately 107 kDa accumulates predominantly in the stroma and to a lower extent associates with the thylakoid membrane. Comparably to E. coli, in which SecA activity can be inhibited by sodium azide, thylakoid translocation of a subset of lumenal proteins is sensitive to sodium azide in pea but not in spinach chloroplasts, suggesting that the latter contain an azide-resistant SecA variant.

Signal recognition particle (SRP), a ubiquitous initiator of protein translocation

In higher eukaryotes, most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesised by ribosomes which are attached to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). This allows the proteins to be translocated across that membrane already during their synthesis. The ribosomes are directed to the RER membrane by a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle, the signal recognition particle (SRP). SRP fulfills its task by virtue of three distinguishable activities: the binding of a signal sequence which, being part of the nascent polypeptide to be translocated, is exposed on the surface of a translating ribosome; the retardation of any further elongation; and the SRP-receptor-mediated binding of the complex of ribosome, nascent polypeptide and SRP to the RER membrane which results in the detachment of SRP from the signal sequence and the ribosome and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the membrane. Evidence is accumulating that SRP is not restricted to eukaryotes: SRP-related particles and SRP-receptor-related molecules are found ubiquitously and may function in protein translocation in every living organism. This review focuses on the mammalian SRP. A brief discussion of its overall structure is followed by a detailed description of the structures of its RNA and protein constituents and the requirements for their assembly into the particle. Homologues of SRP components from organisms other than mammals are mentioned to emphasize the components' conserved or less conserved features. Subsequently, the functions of each of the SRP constituents are discussed. This sets the stage for a presentation of a model for the mechanism by which SRP cyclically assembles and disassembles with translating ribosomes and the RER membrane. It may be expected that similar mechanisms are used by SRP homologues in organisms other than mammals. However, the mammalian SRP-mediated translocation mechanism may not be conserved in its entirety in organisms like Escherichia coli whose SRP lack components required for the function of the mammalian SRP. Possible translocation pathways involving the rudimentary SRP are discussed in view of the existence of alternative, chaperone-mediated translocation pathways with which they may intersect. The concluding two sections deal with open questions in two areas of SRP research. One formulates basic questions regarding the little-investigated biogenesis of SRP. The other gives an outlook over the insights into the mechanisms of each of the known activities of the SRP that are to be expected in the short and medium-term future.