RNA editing of the coI mRNA throughout the life cycle of Physarum polycephalum

RNA editing in Physarum mitochondria: assays and biochemical approaches

Mitochondrial RNAs in the myxomycete Physarum polycephalum differ from the templates from which they are transcribed in defined ways. Most transcripts contain nucleotides that are not present in their respective genes. These "extra" nucleotides are added during RNA synthesis by an unknown mechanism. Other differences observed between Physarum mitochondrial RNAs and the mitochondrial genome include nucleotide deletions, C to U changes, and the replacement of one nucleotide for another at the 5' end of tRNAs. All of these alterations are remarkably precise and highly efficient in vivo. Many of these editing events can be replicated in vitro, and here we describe both the in vitro systems used to study editing in Physarum mitochondria and the assays that have been developed to assess the extent of editing of RNAs generated in these systems at individual sites.

Rewriting the information in DNA: RNA editing in kinetoplastids and myxomycetes

RNA editing has a major impact on the genes and genomes that it modifies. Editing by insertion, deletion and base conversion exists in nuclear, mitochondrial and viral genomes throughout the eukaryotic lineage. Editing was first discovered in kinetoplastids, and recent work has resulted in the characterization of some components of the editing machinery. Two proteins with ligase activity have been identified in Trypanosoma brucei, and other proteins in the editosome complex are yielding to the probe of research. A second group of protists, myxomycetes, are unique in their use of four different types of editing within a single transcript. Phylogenetic analysis of editing in representative myxomycetes revealed a different history of the four types of editing in this lineage. Development of a soluble in vitro editing system has provided further support for the co-transcriptional nature of editing in Physarum polycephalum, and will certainly provide future opportunities for understanding this mysterious process.

Editing site recognition and nucleotide insertion are separable processes in Physarum mitochondria

Insertional RNA editing in Physarum polycephalum is a complex process involving the specific addition of non-templated nucleotides to nascent mitochondrial transcripts. Since all four ribonucleotides are substrates for the editing activity(s), both the site of insertion and the identity of the nucleotide to be added at a particular position must be specified, but the signals for these events have yet to be elucidated. Here we report the occurrence of sporadic errors in RNAs synthesized in vitro. These mistakes, which include omission of encoded nucleotides as well as misinsertions, occur only on templates that support editing. The pattern of these misediting events indicates that editing site recognition and nucleotide addition are separable events, and that the recognition step involves features of the mitochondrial template that are required for editing. The larger deletions lack all templated nucleotides between editing sites, suggesting that the transcription/editing apparatus can "jump" from one insertion site to another, perhaps mediated by interactions with editing determinants, while smaller omissions most likely reflect misalignment of the transcript upon resumption of templated RNA synthesis.

Non-templated addition of nucleotides to the 3' end of nascent RNA during RNA editing in Physarum

RNAs in Physarum: mitochondria contain extra nucleotides that are not encoded by the mitochondrial genome, at least in the traditional sense. While it is known that insertion of non-encoded nucleotides is linked to RNA synthesis, the exact nature of this relationship remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that the efficiency of editing is sensitive not only to the concentration of the nucleotide that is inserted, but also to the concentration of the nucleotide templated just downstream of an editing site. These data strongly support a co-transcriptional mechanism of Physarum: RNA editing in which non-encoded nucleotides are added to the 3' end of nascent RNAs. These results also suggest that transcription elongation and nucleotide insertion are competing processes and that recognition of editing sites most likely involves transient pausing by the Physarum: mitochondrial RNA polymerase. In addition, the pattern of nucleotide concentration effects, the context of editing sites and the accuracy of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase argue that the mechanism of Physarum: editing is distinct from that of other co-transcriptional editing systems.

Functions and mechanisms of RNA editing

RNA editing can be broadly defined as any site-specific alteration in an RNA sequence that could have been copied from the template, excluding changes due to processes such as RNA splicing and polyadenylation. Changes in gene expression attributed to editing have been described in organisms from unicellular protozoa to man, and can affect the mRNAs, tRNAs, and rRNAs present in all cellular compartments. These sequence revisions, which include both the insertion and deletion of nucleotides, and the conversion of one base to another, involve a wide range of largely unrelated mechanisms. Recent advances in the development of in vitro editing and transgenic systems for these varied modifications have provided a better understanding of similarities and differences between the biochemical strategies, regulatory sequences, and cellular factors responsible for such RNA processing events.

Mitochondrial RNAs of myxomycetes terminate with non-encoded 3' poly(U) tails

We examined the 3' ends of edited RNAs from the myxomycetes Stemonitis flavogenita and Physarum polycephalum using a modified anchor PCR approach. Surprisingly, we found that poly(A) tails are missing from the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 mRNA (coI) from both species and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 mRNA (cox3) from P. polycephalum. Instead, non-encoded poly(U) tails of varying length were discovered at the 3' ends of these transcripts. These are the first described examples of 3' poly(U) tails on mature mRNAs in any system.

Editing of cytochrome b mRNA in physarum mitochondria

The reading frame in the mRNA for the cytochrome b apoprotein in mitochondria of Physarum polycephalum is created by the insertion of 43 nucleotides in the mRNA relative to the mtDNA sequence encoding it (RNA editing). Most of these insertions (31) are single cytidines; however, single uridines are inserted at six sites, and the dinucleotides, CU and GC, are inserted at two sites and one site, respectively. These insertions create a 392-codon reading frame in the mature mRNA. The amino acid sequence inferred from this reading frame has similarity to cytochrome b apoproteins encoded by other mtDNAs. The insertions are quite evenly distributed throughout the length of the reading frame with an average spacing of 27 nucleotides. This mRNA has the highest percentage (23%) of noncytidine insertions of any Physarum RNA characterized to date. cDNAs corresponding to partially edited RNAs can be enriched by selective amplification. Some cDNAs that lack the GC dinucleotide insertion are fully edited at sites flanking the GC dinucleotide insertion site. Similarly some cDNAs lack the CT dinucleotide insertion or have a CC or TT insertion flanked by a fully edited sequence. These results imply that dinucleotide editing occurs by a process separate from the global insertion of cytidines.

Insertional editing of mitochondrial tRNAs of Physarum polycephalum and Didymium nigripes

tRNAs encoded on the mitochondrial DNA of Physarum polycephalum and Didymium nigripes require insertional editing for their maturation. Editing consists of the specific insertion of a single cytidine or uridine relative to the mitochondrial DNA sequence encoding the tRNA. Editing sites are at 14 different locations in nine tRNAs. Cytidine insertion sites can be located in any of the four stems of the tRNA cloverleaf and usually create a G. C base pair. Uridine insertions have been identified in the T loop of tRNALys from Didymium and tRNAGlu from Physarum. In both tRNAs, the insertion creates the GUUC sequence, which is converted to GTPsiC (Psi = pseudouridine) in most tRNAs. This type of tRNA editing is different from other, previously described types of tRNA editing and resembles the mRNA and rRNA editing in Physarum and Didymium. Analogous tRNAs in Physarum and Didymium have editing sites at different locations, indicating that editing sites have been lost, gained, or both since the divergence of Physarum and Didymium. Although cDNAs derived from single tRNAs are generally fully edited, cDNAs derived from unprocessed polycistronic tRNA precursors often lack some of the editing site insertions. This enrichment of partially edited sequences in unprocessed tRNAs may indicate that editing is required for tRNA processing or at least that RNA editing occurs as an early event in tRNA synthesis.

Insertional editing of nascent mitochondrial RNAs in Physarum

Maturation of Physarum mitochondrial RNA involves the highly specific insertion of nonencoded nucleotides at multiple locations. To investigate the mechanism(s) by which this occurs, we previously developed an isolated mitochondrial system in which run-on transcripts are accurately and efficiently edited by nucleotide insertion. Here we show that under limiting concentrations of exogenous nucleotides the mitochondrial RNA polymerases stall, generating a population of nascent RNAs that can be extended upon addition of limiting nucleotide. Several of these RNA species have been characterized and were found to be fully edited, indicating that nascent RNA is a substrate for nucleotide insertion in isolated Physarum mitochondria. Remarkably, these RNAs are edited at positions located within 14-22 nucleotides of the polymerase active site, suggesting that insertional editing may be physically or functionally associated with transcription. The absence of unedited RNA in these experiments indicates that large tracts of RNA downstream of editing sites are not required for nucleotide addition, and argues that insertional editing in Physarum occurs with a 5' to 3' polarity. These data also provide strong evidence that insertional editing in Physarum is mechanistically distinct from editing in kinetoplastid systems.