Postreplication repair defects in mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

The DNA polymerases of Drosophila melanogaster

DNA synthesis during replication or repair is a fundamental cellular process that is catalyzed by a set of evolutionary conserved polymerases. Despite a large body of research, the DNA polymerases of Drosophila melanogaster have not yet been systematically reviewed, leading to inconsistencies in their nomenclature, shortcomings in their functional (Gene Ontology, GO) annotations and an under-appreciation of the extent of their characterization. Here, we describe the complete set of DNA polymerases in D. melanogaster, applying nomenclature already in widespread use in other species, and improving their functional annotation. A total of 19 genes encode the proteins comprising three replicative polymerases (alpha-primase, delta, epsilon), five translesion/repair polymerases (zeta, eta, iota, Rev1, theta) and the mitochondrial polymerase (gamma). We also provide an overview of the biochemical and genetic characterization of these factors in D. melanogaster. This work, together with the incorporation of the improved nomenclature and GO annotation into key biological databases, including FlyBase and UniProtKB, will greatly facilitate access to information about these important proteins.

The Drosophila mus 308 gene product, implicated in tolerance of DNA interstrand crosslinks, is a nuclear protein found in both ovaries and embryos

mus 308 designates one of over 30 mutagen sensitivity loci found in Drosophila. It is predicted to code for a 229-kDa polypeptide. Published sequence analyses of others indicate that this polypeptide would have helicase motifs near its N-terminus, and similarities to bacterial DNA polymerase I-like enzymes near its C-terminus. In our studies, two different and highly specific antibodies were prepared and used for identification as well as characterization of the mus 308 gene product. Western blot analyses reveal a single reactive polypeptide in both ovaries and embryos as well as in two Drosophila embryo tissue culture cell lines; it is nearly absent in homozygous mus 308 mutants. This polypeptide is about 229 kDa in size, and indirect immunofluorescence shows that the mus 308 gene product localizes throughout nuclei in wild-type cells but appears to be absent in a mus 308 mutant. Immunoblot analyses throughout development suggest greatest abundance at the end of embryogenesis, immediately before hatching of first instar larvae. They also showed a smaller ( approximately 100 kDa) antigenically and genetically related polypeptide found only in adult males. Immunoprecipitation, a highly effective method of specific purification, suggests that the mus 308 protein has DNA polymerase activity that is NEM-sensitive but largely aphidicolin-resistant. In addition, the immunoprecipitated material has DNA-dependent ATPase but lacks detectable helicase.

DNA repair defects and other (mus)takes in Drosophila melanogaster

Preservation of the structural integrity of DNA in any organism is crucial to its health and survival. Such preservation is achieved by an extraordinary cellular arsenal of damage surveillance and repair functions, many of which are now being defined at the gene and protein levels. Mutants hypersensitive to the killing effects of DNA-damaging agents have been instrumental in helping to identify DNA repair-related genes and to elucidate repair mechanisms. In Drosophila melanogaster, such strains are generally referred to as mutagen-sensitive (mus) mutants and currently define more than 30 genetic loci. Whereas most mus mutants have been recovered on the basis of hypersensitivity to the monofunctional alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate, they nevertheless constitute a phenotypically diverse group, with many mutants having effects beyond mutagen sensitivity. These phenotypes include meiotic dysfunctions, somatic chromosome instabilities, chromatin abnormalities, and cell proliferation defects. Within the last few years numerous mus and other DNA repair-related genes of Drosophila have been molecularly cloned, providing new insights into the functions of these genes. This article outlines strategies for isolating mus mutations and reviews recent advances in the Drosophila DNA repair field, emphasizing mutant analysis and gene cloning.

Search for DNA repair pathways in Drosophila melanogaster

The knowledge about the existence of different pathways for the repairing of DNA lesions has made possible a better understanding of mutation processes. The double mutant method has been shown to be useful for grouping rad mutants in yeast. Through this method, three different groups of repair mechanisms were found: (a) RAD3 group corresponding to the excision repair of UV lesions, (b) RAD6 group corresponding to the translesion type of post-replication repair and (c) RAD52 group corresponding to the recombination type of post-replication repair. In this work, a search for a classification of Drosophila mus mutants in groups analogous to yeast RAD groups is done. Information obtained by double mutant studies was integrated with that obtained by biochemical, recombination, DNA damaging agent sensitivity and mutation studies. The following groups were found: (a) group of mei9 and mus201, analogous to RAD3, (b) group of mei41 and mus302 analogous to RAD52 and, (c) group of mus104 and mus101 analogous to RAD6. In addition, there are mutants that belong to a group corresponding to pre-replication repair of MMS lesions such as mus103, mus306 and mus207. As a peculiarity of Drosophila, it was found that interaction between pre- and post-replication repair mechanisms is indifferent and not synergistic as was found in yeast. A possible explanation could be a weaker control of post-replication repair mechanisms in Drosophila than in yeast. It is expected that this research could help for a better understanding of repair mechanisms in complex organisms.

Molecular cloning of Drosophila mus308, a gene involved in DNA cross-link repair with homology to prokaryotic DNA polymerase I genes

Mutations in the Drosophila mus308 gene confer specific hypersensitivity to DNA-cross-linking agents as a consequence of defects in DNA repair. The mus308 gene is shown here to encode a 229-kDa protein in which the amino-terminal domain contains the seven conserved motifs characteristic of DNA and RNA helicases and the carboxy-terminal domain shares over 55% sequence similarity with the polymerase domains of prokaryotic DNA polymerase I-like enzymes. This is the first reported member of this family of DNA polymerases in a eukaryotic organism, as well as the first example of a single polypeptide with homology to both DNA polymerase and helicase motifs. Identification of a closely related gene in the genome of Caenorhabditis elegans suggests that this novel polypeptide may play an evolutionarily conserved role in the repair of DNA damage in eukaryotic organisms.

The hypermutability conferred by the mus308 mutation of Drosophila is not specific for cross-linking agents

The hypersensitivity of the mus308 mutant of D. melanogaster to cross-linking agents has been suggested to be the consequence of a possible defect of this mutant in DNA cross-link repair. Moreover, the mus308 mutation has been proposed as an animal model for the study of Fanconi's anemia. In order to obtain more information about the function controlled by this locus, we have measured the mutability of the mus308 mutant to several mutagens with different modes of action using the sex-linked recessive lethal test. We show that this mutation confers hypermutability not only to the cross-linking agents tested, hexamethylphosphoramide and hexamethylmelamine, but to the point mutagen N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea as well, whereas the response to methyl methanesulfonate was normal. The results suggest that the mus308 locus is not defective in a repair pathway specific for cross-links but is rather involved in a step of a more general post-replication repair process responsible for the removal of non-excised adducts.

Molecular cloning of mei-41, a gene that influences both somatic and germline chromosome metabolism of Drosophila melanogaster

The mei-41 gene of Drosophila melanogaster plays an essential role in meiosis, in the maintenance of somatic chromosome stability, in postreplication repair and in DNA double-strand break repair. This gene has been cytogenetically localized to polytene chromosome bands 14C4-6 using available chromosomal aberrations. About 60 kb of DNA sequence has been isolated following a bidirectional chromosomal walk that extends over the cytogenetic interval 14C1-6. The breakpoints of chromosomal aberrations identified within that walk establish that the entire mei-41 gene has been cloned. Two independently derived mei-41 mutants have been shown to carry P insertions within a single 2.2 kb fragment of the walk. Since revertants of those mutants have lost the P element sequences, an essential region of the mei-41 gene is present in that fragment. A 10.5 kb genomic fragment that spans the P insertion sites has been found to restore methyl methanesulfonate resistance and female fertility of the mei-41D3 mutants. The results demonstrate that all the sequences required for the proper expression of the mei-41 gene are present on this genomic fragment. This study provides the foundation for molecular analysis of a function that is essential for chromosome stability in both the germline and somatic cells.

Re-evaluation of excision repair in the mus304, mus306 and mus308 mutants of Drosophila

The excision repair capacity of the third chromosomal mus mutations of Drosophila has been re-evaluated. A partial deficiency in the excision repair of pyrimidine dimers originally observed in the mus304 mutants is now attributed to the presence of a secondary phr mutation in that stock. Since the mus306 and mus308 stocks also carry secondary phr mutations, their partial deficiency in repair of pyrimidine dimers may also be the result of that secondary mutation. Accordingly, the Drosophila mutations that are now definitively associated with defects in the incision step of pyrimidine dimers removal are mei-9, mus201 and phr. The genes mus302 and mus310 appear to play a role in later stages of excision repair.

Mutant alleles of the meiotic locus, mei-9, differ in degree of effects on rod chromosome magnification and ring chromosome transmission in Drosophila

Two mutant alleles of the meiotic locus, mei-9, have been examined for their effect on magnification of a rod Xbb chromosome and transmission of a ring Xbb chromosome under magnifying conditions. Our results indicate that the effects of these two mutations are allele-specific: mei-9a strongly inhibits both rod chromosome magnification and ring chromosome loss under magnifying conditions, while mei-9b has a smaller inhibitory effect on rod chromosome magnification and on the transmission of ring chromosomes under magnifying conditions. These observations can be explained by a difference in leakiness between the two alleles. Our results demonstrate that mutants defective in excision repair and repair replication inhibit ribosomal gene magnification. This suggests that a component of the excision repair pathway is involved in the process of magnification.

A cell-cycle stage-related chromosomal X-ray hypersensitivity in larval neuroblasts of Drosophila mei-9 and mei-41 mutants suggesting defective DNA double-strand break repair

We have examined the chromosomal X-ray hypersensitivity in relation to the cell cycle in larval neuroblasts of the mutagen-sensitive and excision repair-defective mutant mei-9 and of the mutagen-sensitive and post-replication repair-defective mutant mei-41 of Drosophila melanogaster. When compared to wild-type cells, cells bearing the mei-9L1 allele produced unusually high levels in particular of chromatid deletions and to a lesser extent also of isochromatid deletions, but virtually no exchange aberrations. The chromosomal hypersensitivity is apparent at M1 when cells are irradiated in S or G2 but not when irradiated in G1. On the other hand, following irradiation cells bearing the mei-41D5 allele predominantly produce chromosome deletions. Also dicentric and chromatid exchange formation is enhanced with a moderate increase in chromatid deletions. The phases of major sensitivity are the S and G1. Mei-9 and mei-41 mutants have been classified to date as proficient in DNA double-strand break repair. The data presented in this paper revealed an S-independent clastogenic hypersensitivity of mei-9 and mei-41 cells. They are interpreted as indicative evidence for the presence of impaired DNA double-strand break repair. The cell-cycle-related difference in the ratio of chromatid- versus chromosome-type deletions in both mutants suggests repair defects at partially different phases of the cell cycle in mei-9 and mei-41 mutant cells.

Isolation and characterization of second chromosome mutagen-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster

We have undertaken the study of a collection of 32 Drosophila melanogaster mus strains selected on the basis of developmental sensitivity to the DNA-damaging agents, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene (AAF), nitrogen mustard (HN2), and gamma-radiation. In total, 18 of these strains are sensitive to MMS. In turn, 14 of these exhibit unconditional MMS sensitivity (one of the latter mutants is lethal at 29 degrees C), whereas the other 4 are sensitive to MMS only at higher temperatures. Detailed analysis of the 7 strongest MMS-sensitive strains reveals that they identify 4 new second chromosome mus loci. Two mus loci are each represented by two alleles. One mutant (mus205B1) is allelic to a previously characterized mus locus. Different MMS-sensitive mutants display patterns of mutagen cross-sensitivity (to AAF, HN2, benzo[a]pyrene (BP), and gamma-rays) that parallel the range of responses seen in previously recovered X-linked and autosomal mus loci. In general, mutations that are strongly sensitive to MMS are also sensitive to one or both of the procarcinogens, AAF and BP, as opposed to HN2 and gamma-radiation. In contrast, the moderately MMS-sensitive mutations are sensitive to HN2 and gamma-rays, but not to AAF or BP. Of the 14 mus strains that are not sensitive to MMS, 5 are sensitive to AAF, another 5 are sensitive to HN2, and the remaining 4 are sensitive to gamma-rays.

Mutations at the mei-41, mus(1)101, mus(1)103, mus(2)205 and mus(3)310 loci of Drosophila exhibit differential UDS responses with different DNA-damaging agents

5 mutagen-sensitive mutants of Drosophila melanogaster, reported to perform normal or only slightly reduced excision repair of UV damage, were examined by an unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay. This assay measures the ability of cultured primary cells, derived from each mutant, to perform the resynthesis step in the excision repair pathway, following damage to cellular DNA by direct-acting alkylating agents, UV or X-irradiation. 2 mutants, classified as completely or partially proficient for both excision and postreplication repair of UV damage, mus(1)103 and mus(2)205, were found to give positive UDS responses only for UV damage. These mutants exhibit no measurable UDS activity following DNA damage by several different alkylating agents and X-rays. 3 mutants, classified as having no defect in excision repair, but measurable defects in postreplication repair of UV damage, mei-41, mus(1)101, and mus(3)310 exhibit 3 different response patterns when tested with the battery of agents in the UDS assay. The mutant mei-41 exhibits a highly positive UDS response following damage by all agents, consistent with its prior classification as excision-repair-proficient, but postreplication-repair-deficient for UV damage. The mutant mus(1)101, however, exhibits a strong positive UDS response following only UV damage and appears to be blocked in the excision repair of damage produced by both alkylating agents and X-irradiation. Finally, mus(3)310 exhibits no UDS response to alkylation, X-ray or UV damage. This is not consistent with its previous classification. Results obtained with the quantitative in vitro UDS assay are entirely consistent with the results from two separate in vivo measures of excision repair deficiency following DNA damage, larval hypersensitivity to killing and hypermutability in the sex-linked recessive lethal test.

Hypersensitivity of Drosophila mei-41 mutants to hydroxyurea is associated with reduced mitotic chromosome stability

6 mutant alleles of the mei-41 locus in Drosophila melanogaster are shown to cause hypersensitivity to hydroxyurea in larvae. The strength of that sensitivity is directly correlated with the influence of the mutant alleles on meiosis in that: alleles exhibiting a strong meiotic effect (mei-41D2, mei-41D5, mei-41D7) are highly sensitive; alleles with negligible meiotic effects (mei-41(104)D1, mei-41(104)D2) are moderately sensitive and an allele which expresses meiotic effects only under restricted conditions (mei-41D9) has an intermediate sensitivity. This sensitivity is not a general feature of strong postreplication repair-deficient mutants, because mutants with that phenotype from other loci do not exhibit sensitivity (mus(2)205A1, mus(3)302D1, mus(3)310D1). The observed lethality is not due to hypersensitivity of DNA synthesis in mei-41 larvae to hydroxyurea as assayed by tritiated thymidine incorporation. Lethality is, however, potentially attributable to an abnormal enhancement of chromosomal aberrations by hydroxyurea in mutant mei-41 larvae. Both in vivo and in vitro exposure of neuroblast cells to hydroxyurea results in an increase in 3 types of aberrations which is several fold higher in mei-41 tissue. Since hydroxyurea disrupts DNA synthesis, these results further implicate the mei-41 locus in DNA metabolism and provide an additional tool for an elucidation of its function. The possible existence of additional genes of this nature is suggested by a more modest sensitivity to hydroxyurea which has been detected in two stocks carrying mutagen-sensitive alleles of alternate genes.

Repair-defect mutations inhibit rDNA magnification in Drosophila and discriminate between meiotic and premeiotic magnification

We have examined rDNA magnification in Drosophila melanogaster males carrying one of 11 recombination- or repair-defective mutations representing seven loci. We show that mutations defined by a defect in postreplication repair (mus-101, mei-41, and mus-108) are also defective in rDNA magnification, whereas mutations that do not affect postreplication repair have little or no effect on magnification. mei-41 inhibits only premeiotic magnification events, while mus-108 blocks both premeiotic and meiotic events. This suggests that meiotic and premeiotic events share some but not all functions. A molecular analysis of rDNA magnification reveals that in mus-108 males, changes in the rDNA restriction pattern can occur within one or a few generations under magnifying conditions. We interpret these data in terms of the role of DNA repair systems in rDNA magnification and in terms of stable maintenance of tandemly repeated genes.

The giant (gt) mutants of Drosophila melanogaster alter DNA metabolism

Abnormalities in DNA metabolism have been found in third-instar females of Drosophila melanogaster that are heteroallelic or homoallelic for X-chromosomal giant (gt) mutations. Analysis of DNA metabolism in larval brain ganglia was carried out using alkaline sucrose gradient centrifugation, incorporation assays and a neutral filter elution assay. These analyses show that gt stocks synthesize DNA of a reduced molecular weight, have an unusually high frequency of spontaneous single and double-strand breaks, and exhibit a reduction in the normal inhibition of DNA synthesis following treatment with UV and the carcinogen AAAF. These phenomena are not associated with a defect in the repair of X-ray induced DNA breaks nor are they accompanied by any alterations in chromosome stability. Analysis of homozygous 1(2)gl larvae also reveal that these phenomena are specific to the gt locus and are thus not attributable solely to an extended developmental program. These findings strengthen the suggestion that the genetic instability associated with gt is related to perturbations in chromosome metabolism (Green 1982).

Drosophila mutations at the mei-9 and mus(2)201 loci which block excision of thymine dimers also block induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis by methyl methanesulfonate, ethyl methanesulfonate, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, UV light and X-rays

The mei-9 and mus(2)201 mutants of Drosophila melanogaster were identified as mutagen-sensitive mutants on the basis of larval hypersensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate and characterized as excision repair-deficient on the basis of a greatly reduced capacity to excise thymine dimers from cellular DNA. The high degree of larval cytotoxicity observed with a variety of other chemical and physical agents indicated that these mutants may be unable to excise other important classes of DNA adducts. We have measured the ability of the single mutants and the double mutant combination mei-9;mus(2)201 to perform the resynthesis step in excision repair by means of an autoradiographic analysis of unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) induced in a mixed population of primary cells in culture. The 3 strains exhibit no detectable UDS activity in response to applied doses of 1.5-6.0 mM methyl methanesulfonate, 1.0-4.5 mM N-methyl-N-nitrosourea or 10-40 J/m2 254-nm UV light, dose ranges in which control cells exhibit a strong dose-dependent UDS response. The mei-9 and mei-9;mus(2)201 mutants also have no detectable UDS response to X-ray doses of 300-1800 rad, whereas the mus(2)201 mutant exhibits a reduced, but dose-dependent, response over this range. These data correlate well with the degree of larval hypersensitivity of the strains and suggest that mutations at both loci block the excision repair of a wide variety of DNA damage prior to the resynthesis step.